-
UCLACivilRightsProject/ProyectoDerechosCiviles,August16,2019www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu
1
ConfrontingtheEquityIssuesinDualLanguageImmersionPrograms:Asummaryofthe2018UCLAForumonEquityandDLEducation
December7-8,2018
PatriciaGándara,UCLAandRobertSlater,AmericanCouncilsResearch
Section1.RationaleandOrganizationofForum
DualLanguageImmersion(DLI)representsaneducationstrategythatoffersthe
promiseofaccesstoqualityeducationforstudentsfromdiversebackgrounds,especially
formarginalizedor“minoritized”ethnicandlinguisticpopulations.Althoughthereisno
currentcensusofDLIprograms,programtypes,orenrollment,theevidenceofexpansionis
considerable.Arecentreport(Gross,2016)citedanestimated2,000DLIprograms
nationwide.Recenttrendssuggestthatestimateisdramaticallyunderstatedwith
considerableproliferationinstatesincludingCalifornia,Delaware,NorthCarolina,Texas,
andUtah.NewYorkCity,in2018-19added48newduallanguageprogramstothealready
morethan175alreadyexistingprograms.DLIprogramsoperateindozensoflanguages
acrossthecountry.Thegreatestdemand,byfar,isforSpanish-Englishprograms,giventhat
morethanthree-quarters(77%)ofEnglishlearnersintheU.S.arespeakersofSpanish
(USED,2017)andthegrowingappealtomonolingualEnglishspeakerstogaincompetence
inSpanishforitseconomicvalue.
OurfocusisonTwo-WayDLI(TWDLI)programswhichrequirethatbothnative
speakersofEnglishandspeakersofthe“partner”language(e.g.Spanish)areeducated
togetherinbothlanguages.Studentshavebothmodelsofnativespeechaswellas
companionswithwhomtousethelanguagetheyarelearningina“naturalsetting.”
Throughtwo-wayprograms,DLIoffersthepromisenotonlytoleveltheplayingfieldfor
studentsbuttotransformschoolsandschooldistrictsthrough“purposefulintegration”of
-
UCLACivilRightsProject/ProyectoDerechosCiviles,August16,2019www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu
2
partnerlanguagespeakers(immigrantandU.S.-born)andEnglishspeakers(Ariasand
Markos,2018),perhapsevenshiftingpopulationsthatmighthelpreversetrendsthat
includeincreasedsegregationofLatinxandimmigrantpopulations.
AlongwiththeavailableresearchdemonstratingthesuccessesofDLIareconcerns
aboutpracticesandcontextsfordifferentgroupsofstudents.Therearepotentially
significanteducationalachievementopportunitiesaffordedbyDLIprogramsasresearch
evidencehasdemonstrated.Butthereisalsosignificantrisktoachievingthepromiseof
DLIwhenstudentsandfamilieswithdifferentlanguageexperiences,cultures,
socioeconomicstatus,andotherdemographicandpersonalhistorycharacteristicsdonot
realizethepotentialfullbenefitsofDLI.Indeed,manyoftherisksareassociatedwiththe
aspirationsofastrategythathasemergedsoquicklyandinsomanywayspushedthe
boundariesofcurricularinnovation,teacherandadministratordevelopmentand
preparation,alongwiththecapacityofschooldistrictstomakeeffectivedecisions
regardingDLIschoolplacementandrulesofenrollment.Itisimportanttoassessdual
languageprogramsinthecontextofchangingandevolvingtheoriesandpracticein
education.
OurgoalintheForumonEquityandDualLanguageEducationwastointroduce
toduallanguageeducationaninformedandmoresystematicdialogueamongacademics,
researchersandpractitionersabouttherelationshipsbetweenissuesofequityanddual
languagepractices.Ourhopewastocreateopportunitiesforconstructiveengagement
amongduallanguagepractitioners(schooladministrators,teachers)andeducationequity
experts.
-
UCLACivilRightsProject/ProyectoDerechosCiviles,August16,2019www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu
3
WefocusedontheaccumulatingevidenceforDLprogramstonarrowthe
achievementgapforstudentsfromdifferentraces,ethnicities,socio-economicstatusand
languagebackgrounds.DLorientsschoolstoward“additivebilingualism”and
multiculturalismwherebothlanguagesandtheirculturesarevalued.Equitably
implementedDLentailslearningasaconstructiveandsocialprocessandemphasizes
instructionalpracticesinanenvironmentthatvaluesallstudents.Yet,therearemany
potentialequitypitfallsintheimplementationofsuchprogramsandimportantquestions
thatouragendawilladdress:
(1) TheidealTWDLImodelisabalanceof50%Englishand50%partnerlanguage
speakers.TheefforttoenrollandappeaseparentsofEnglishspeakersbyallowing
programstobecomeunbalanced(Dorner,2011),orthepracticeoftippingthe
enrollmentbalancetowardspeakersofthepartner(e.g.Spanish)language
significantlyimpactsthepowerofthetwo-waymodel.
(2) DecisionsaboutwheretolocateDLandwhetherDLwillbewholeschoolor
“strand”canhaveamajorimpact(sometimesunintended)onneighborhoodand
schooldemographics.Itcanalsoexacerbatetransportationissues.
(3) OftenmorepowerfulparentsofEnglish-speakingstudentscanpressureteachers
toresponddisproportionatelytotheneedsoftheirchildren,resultingin
potentially“watereddown”partnerlanguageinstructioninordertoaccommodate
Englishspeakers.Thisunderminesdevelopmentofstrongprimarylanguageskills
ofthepartnerlanguage(Valdes,1997).
(4) Shortagesofteacherswithproficiencyinpartnerlanguageshaveledto
“importing”teachersfromothercountries.Whiletheseteachersostensiblyspeak
-
UCLACivilRightsProject/ProyectoDerechosCiviles,August16,2019www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu
4
thesamelanguage,theymaydisparagethelocalidiomandlackconnectionto
studentsduetovastlydifferentsocialandculturalbackgrounds(Cervantes-Soon,
2017).
(5) Thechoiceofpartnerlanguagemaybedeterminedbytheschooldistrictrather
thantheneedsanddesiresofthelocalcommunity.Deprivingstudentsaccessto
primarylanguagedevelopmentintheirnativelanguagecannullifythepotentially
positiveimpactofDLprograms(Cheung,2017).
(6) InadequateorunevenstandardsforDLprogramsrestrictthecapacitytoknow
howwellstudentsarebeingtaughtinbothlanguages.Thisisexacerbatedbythe
factthatnostaterequiresregularassessmentofthepartnerlanguagefor
accountabilitypurposes.
SectionII:TheStructureoftheForum
AnorganizingcommitteecomposedofDr.PatriciaGándara(UCLA),Dr.Robert
Slater(AmericanCouncilsResearchCenter),Mr.GreggRoberts(AmericanCouncils
ResearchCenter),andDr.DonnaChristian(CenterforAppliedLinguistics)metseveral
timesbyphonetodeterminethebestmodeforenablingdiscussionattheforum,identify
criticaltopicsforpapers,androlesforpaperdiscussants.Weundertookabriefliterature
reviewtoidentifynamesandtopicsthatwereprominentintherecentjournalliterature.
Theteamsoughtasmuchgeographicdiversityaspossibleaswellindividualswhohada
solidrecordofscholarship,nottheleasttoensurethatthecommissionedpaperswouldbe
thoroughandcompletedinatimelyfashion.Itwasdecidedthatcommentators/reviewers
wouldreceivethepapersatleasttwoweeksbeforetheconferenceandprovidefeedbackto
-
UCLACivilRightsProject/ProyectoDerechosCiviles,August16,2019www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu
5
theauthorass/hewished,andpreparea20-30minutesresponsetothepaper,including
thepointstheyfeltweremostcriticaltoinsertinthediscussion.
Thepapertopicsandauthorsanddiscussantswere:
• RobertSlater,DonnaChristian,RichardBrecht,”Overviewofthefieldofduallanguageinstruction.”
• KathrynLindholm-Leary,SanJoseState,“Duallanguageprogramplanningandequity”Discussant:AnaHernandez,CSUSanMarcos
• ClaudiaCervantes-Soon,ArizonaState,“Race,socialjusticeandpowerequity.”Discussant:NelsonFlores,Penn
• MagalyLavadenz,LMU,“RecruitingandPreparingtherightteachers.”Discussant:ShellySpiegel-Coleman,CaliforniansTogether
• DeborahPalmer,UTAustin,“Equityandduallanguageimmersion.”DiscussantLisaDorner,UofMissouri
Theagendafortheforumwasbuiltaroundthefivepapersandasmuchaspossible,during
adayandone-halfmeeting,webuiltintimeforopendiscussion.Inadditiontothepaper
presentersanddiscussantsweinvitedarepresentativegroupofresearchersand
practitioners.Welimitedthetotalto40participantsinadditiontotheorganizing
committeeandthreestudentnotetakersinanefforttomaximizeconversationand
discussion.Itisnotablethatthiswasthefirsttimemanyoftheseparticipantshadmet.A
copyoftheforumagendaisincludedintheappendix.
-
UCLACivilRightsProject/ProyectoDerechosCiviles,August16,2019www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu
6
PaperOverviews
Slateretal.Overviewofthefieldofduallanguage:
Thegoalofthispaperwastolayafoundationforthediscussionofequityissuesby
summarizingsomeofthemorerecentresearch(andidentifyingsomecriticalgaps)that
mightinformourunderstanding.Thepaperfocusedonthreekeyareasofresearch:(1)
Academicoutcomes;(2)Biliteracyandbilingualism;(3)Socialandbehavioral
development.Thepaperalsoincludedareportontheresultsofanunscientificsurveyof
DLIadministratorsundertakeninSeptemberandOctober2018.Thegoalofthissurvey
wastoidentifyissuesandareasofconcernacrossschooldistrictsthatwouldhelpguidethe
equityconversation.
AcademicOutcomes.Thereislimitedbutgrowingevidencethatsupportsthe
argumentthatinstructionintwolanguagesfromearlygradesproduceshigheracademic
achievementincoreacademiccontent(e.g.languagearts,mathematics,andscience)tested
inEnglish,especiallyforEnglishlanguagelearners.Sincemosttestingiscarriedoutin
English,itisdifficulttoassesstheroleofproficiencyinthepartnerlanguage,otherthanby
assumingadegreeofbilingualismbasedonthecurriculumoffered.Thepaperdiscussesat
somelengththefindingsfromanumberofrecentresearchefforts.
Thereremainsomeseriousgapsandflawsinresearchonacademicoutcomes.
Manystudies,particularlythosefromthe1990sandearly2000s,weresuspectbecauseofa
failuretoadjustforselectionbias.DLIprogramshavenotbeenparticularlyattentiveto
collectingsystematicdataonDLIstudentsmakingitdifficultforresearcherstoinvestigate
longitudinaldata.Wehaveverylimitedresearchthatisabletocontrolforthedifferential
effectsbyrace,ethnicity,orotherfactorssuchaspoverty.Itisalsoimportantto
-
UCLACivilRightsProject/ProyectoDerechosCiviles,August16,2019www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu
7
understandwhetherbenefitsholdacrossracial/ethnicgroups.Notably,AfricanAmerican
studentpopulationshavebeenabsentfrommostresearch,perhapsbecausemanyDLI
programsstruggletoincludethem.Duallanguageeducationresearchershavecalledfor
suchresearchtoexaminetheeffectsofdemographicfactorsandwaysofproviding
effectiveandequitableDLIforallstudents.
BilingualismandBiliteracy.ItisclearthatthefuturesuccessofDLIdependsupon
accommodatingrace,ethnicity,class,andsocialandeconomicstatusofitsstudents.The
focusonproficiencyandusage/exposureprovidesmeasurablevariableswithin“core
programelements”thattietocognitiveadvantagesproventoaffecteducational
achievement.Understandingtherelationshipofdocumentablevariablesofproficiencyand
usagewithrace,ethnicity,classandSESenablesbetterunderstandingofthedifferent
cadresofstudentswhomustbeaccommodatedinDLIprogramming--whichstudentsare
succeedingbytheseexplicitcriteriaandwhicharenot--andtodevelopappropriate
curriculaandresponsivestaff,criticalstepsforwardinsocialjusticegoals.
Theseconsiderationsraiseadditionalimportantquestionsthathavenotbeen
addressedbyresearch:HowmuchDLIisenoughtoensuredesiredlevelsofbilingualismas
definedtoincludebothproficiencyandusage/exposure?Whatistheeffectoftime-on-task
anditsapportionmentforthetwolanguagesinclass(50/50vs.90/10,lengthofprogram)
andoutofclass?DoeffectspersistoratrophyafterexitfromDLI?Doessubsequentcontact
withoneorbothlanguagesmatter?HowdoesDLIprogramstudentmotivationandusage
opportunities?Mostrelevanttoequity,doallDLIstudentsprofitanddotheyprofitequally
intheirdevelopmentoflanguageproficiency?Ofcourse,inordertoanswerthese
-
UCLACivilRightsProject/ProyectoDerechosCiviles,August16,2019www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu
8
questionsitiscriticaltoincludeassessmentofthetargetnon-Englishlanguageinthe
accountabilitystructurefortheseprograms.
Social-EmotionalDevelopment.ConcurrentwithDLIexpansionistheemerging
consensusthateffectivesocialandemotionalskillsareessentialtoachild’sdevelopment
andsuccessasanadult.Social-emotionallearning(SEL)“istheprocessthroughwhich
childrenandadultsacquireandeffectivelyapplytheknowledge,attitudes,andskills
necessarytounderstandandmanageemotions,setandachievepositivegoals,feeland
showempathyforothers,establishandmaintainpositiverelationships,andmake
responsibledecisions.Evidencesuggeststhattheuseofachild’shomelanguageinthe
classroomencouragescloserrelationshipsbetweenteachersandstudents,promoting
betterbehaviorsintheclassroom.Thereisalsoconsistentevidencethatwhendifferent
racialorlanguagegroupsarebroughttogetherinaclassroomunderequalstatus
conditions,itcanresultinenhancedintergrouprelations.Givenincreasingconcernsabout
equityininstructionalpracticesthepaperarguesthatgettingabetterhandleonsocial-
emotionaldevelopmentwillguideDLIprogramsinfocusingmoreattentiononthose
marginalizedstudents.
Wedonotknowalotaboutthesocialandbehavioraldevelopmentofstudents
enrolledinDLI.Itisarelativelynewfieldofempiricalstudyandhighlysubjectiveand
inconsistenteffortsto“measure”andevaluatesocial-emotionaldevelopmenthavelimited
ourunderstanding.Studiesalsosufferfrom(1)failuretotracklearners’social-emotional
developmentovertime;(2)lackofsystematicdefinitionofDLLsacrossdatasets;(3)lackof
differentiationamonglearnersfromnon-English-speakingbackgroundsbyassuming
homogeneitywithinlanguagegroups(e.g.,allSpanishspeakersarethesame);and(4)
-
UCLACivilRightsProject/ProyectoDerechosCiviles,August16,2019www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu
9
inconsistenciesinapproachestoSELmeasurement.Withareenergizedefforttomore
systematicallymeasureandanalyzeSELweshouldbebetterabletoassesstherolethat
DLImightplayinthesocial,behavioralandidentitydevelopmentparticularlyofyoung
children.
SurveyofDualLanguageImmersionAdministrators.Inordertoreflectperspectives
fromthefieldandgainsomeadditionalawarenessofhowpractitionersunderstandthe
equityissue,theauthorsconductedabriefopen-endedsurveyduringSeptember/October
2018.Eighty-twoDLIadministrators(notteachers)fromschools,districtsandstates
acrosstheU.S.wereidentifiedandsent,viaSurveyMonkey,sevenbasicquestionsabout
definingequityandidentifyingkeyequityissuesintheirschoolsandschooldistricts.Thirty
-tworesponseswerereceivedfromadministratorsacross23states.
Ingeneral,wewouldsaythattheresponseswerereflectiveofthestateoftheDLI
fieldwithabroadrecognitionofthecriticalimportanceofequity,butalsoadegreeof
uncertaintyastothedepthandbreadthofequityissuesandtheirpotentialimpactonDLI
programs.Insomecases,respondentsindicatedtherewerenotsignificantequityissues
becausetheirdistrictsarelocatedinpredominantlyEnglishspeakingandnon-immigrant
communities.Itisclearatleastfromthe32respondentsthatasagrouptheyarewell
awareoftheimportantequityissuesconfrontingDLIalthoughtheircharacterizationsof
eachissuevaryandtheirapproachesandsolutionsrangefromsimplistictocomplex.
KathrynLindholm-Leary,Duallanguageprogramplanningandequity
Thispaperwasorganizedaroundfourmainthemes:administrativeequity,
programmaticequity,schools,andparentsandcommunity.Thepaperwasdesignedto
addressthekeyissuesinestablishingandoperatinganequitableduallanguageprogram
-
UCLACivilRightsProject/ProyectoDerechosCiviles,August16,2019www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu
10
fromamaterialandmanagerialperspective.Lindholm-Learytouchedatleastbrieflyon
almostalloftheequityissuesthatwouldberaisedlaterbyotherauthorsandparticipants,
yetfocusedherdiscussionatthelevelofthoseadministeringtheprograms.
UnderadministrativeequityLindholm-Learyraisedtheneedtoensurethatthere
isstrongsupportfortheprogramupanddownthechainofcommandinthedistrictsothat
programsaresustainable.Resourcesmustbeavailabletodevelopandpurchase
curriculum,materialsandassessmentinbothEnglishandthepartnerlanguage.Lindholm-
Learyraisedtheissueofassessmentinthepartnerlanguageasthisisaweaknessofmany
programsasinmostprogramspartnerlanguageassessmentisnotpartofany
accountabilitysystemandweknowthatwhatismeasuredisvalued.Shealsonotesthe
importanceofhigh-qualityprofessionaldevelopment,includingforspecialeducation
teachers,anothercategoryofindividualsthatarefrequentlyoverlooked.Finally,under
administrativeequityshepointstothecriticalissueofwhetherinplanningfortheprogram
bothgroupsofstudents’(nativeEnglishandnon-nativeEnglishspeakers)needsare
consideredequallyinplanningfortheprogram.
UnderprogrammaticconcernsLindholm-Learynotesthatschoolsneedtothink
aboutequityinsupportofdifferentprogramsservingtheneedsofEls,including
transitionalanddevelopmentalbilingualprogramsinadditiontoDLI,andwhetherthe
programswilladopta90-10or50-50approach,somethingthatneedstobediscussedby
thecommunity.Althoughmanybilingualeducatorsconsider90/10tobetheideal,
Lindholm-Learynotesthatthismustbeadecisionoftheparentsandcommunityiftheyare
tobesupportiveoftheprogram.Ofcourse,thepartnerlanguage(s)mustalsobedecidedin
anequitableway.ThereisadefaultnotionthatDLIprogramswillallbeSpanish/English,
-
UCLACivilRightsProject/ProyectoDerechosCiviles,August16,2019www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu
11
butdifferentlanguagecommunitiesneedtobeconsideredwherethereisgreaterdiversity
oflanguagesandcultures.
AcriticalissueinfosteringequitywithinDLIprogramsisdeterminingtheschool
site.Thiscaneasilymakeorbreaktheprogramandresultinunequitableschoolingifnot
thoughtthroughcarefully.Lindholm-Learyposesseveralquestions:Whatistheprofileof
theneighborhood?Isitaccessibletoallgroups?Istransportationprovidedand/or
available?Whatisthesocio-economicstatusoftheneighborhood;willallparentsfeel
comfortablesendingtheirchildrentotheneighborhood?Areparentsconsultedinmaking
thechoiceoflocation?OneofthethorniestproblemsinsettingupDLIschoolsorprograms
istheselectionofstudents.Itiscommontohavelonglistsofstudentswantingtoenroll
andnotenoughspacetoaccommodatethem.Itisalsocommontoexperiencechallengesin
enrollingsufficientnumbersofnativespeakersofthepartnerlanguage,yettheprogram
cannotbeequitablewithoutanequitabledistributionofstudents.So,thesitingofthe
schoolcanbekeyinattractingbothgroupsofstudentsinsomethinglikeequalnumbers.
Finally,whatwillhappentostudentsastheytransitiontomiddleandhighschool?Isthere
anappropriateandaccessibleschoolavailablewhenstudentscompleteelementaryschool?
Parentswillweighthisindeterminingiftheywanttoenrolltheirchildren.
Doprogramplannersconsiderthefullrangeofdiversityinthedistrictandprovide
equitableopportunitiesforallofthesestudents?Underthetopicofstudentsand
families,Lindholm-Learydrillsdownintotheselectionprocessintermsofrecruitment.
Doestheschoolrecruitfromallcommunities?ArediversenativeEnglishspeakers
recruitedandaccepted?Doestheprogramacceptstudentswhodonotspeakeitherofthe
languagesbeingtaught?Arespecialeducationstudentsenrolled?Withrespecttofamilies
-
UCLACivilRightsProject/ProyectoDerechosCiviles,August16,2019www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu
12
therehasbeenaconcernthatmoresavvy,middleclassparentstendtowield
disproportionatedecision-makingpower.Areparentsfromthefullrangeofcultural,
linguisticandsocio-economicgroupsrepresentedindecisionmaking?
RosaMolina,PresidentoftheAssociationofTwo-wayandDualLanguageEducation
(ATDLE),steppedinforKathrynwhohadamedicalemergencyatthelastminute.Molina
presentedthepaperthatKathrynhadwrittenbutprovidedherownemphasisaswell.She
emphasizedtheimportanceofthestudentsandparentsbeingatthecenterofdecision
making—“it’stheirprogramnottheschool’s”--butalsocalledattentiontothepolitical
natureofstudentselection.Shepointedoutthatdiversityintheprogramsisastrength
andtheprogramsshouldendeavortoincorporateIFEPs,specialeducation,anddiverse
Englishspeakersaswellasthosestudentswhospeakthetargetlanguage.Theissueof
IFEPsisanimportantoneasoftentheyareoverlookedwhenprogramsarelookingto
includespeakersofthepartnerlanguage(whichisinterpretedasEnglishlearners)and
nativespeakersofEnglish(whichisinterpretedasEnglishonlyspeakers).Thestudent
thatspeaksbothisanassetintheclassroom.Shealsoemphasizedtheimportanceof
carefulplanningbeforelaunching,otherwiseprogramsfail.
AnaHernandezresponsetoKathrynLindholm-Leary
AnaHernandezprovidedcommentaryonthepaperandpresentation.Shechoseto
emphasizepointsinthepaperthatsheconsideredespeciallyimportant,including:
• TheimportanceofaligningothercurricularofferingswiththeDLI
programs,suchaSTEAMcoursesandotherstudentinterests.Hernández
cautionedusthat“Wetendtosetthestructures,aswellasthelimits,to
-
UCLACivilRightsProject/ProyectoDerechosCiviles,August16,2019www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu
13
accesswhenequityisweakenedbyourownconfiningvisionsandlow
expectationsforstudentpotential.”
• Two-thirdsofbilingualteachershavereceivedtheircredentialsthrough
examinationandnotthroughastrongprogramthatprovidedguided
experienceintheclassroomandintensivepreparation.Sheurgedthat
professionaldevelopmentattendtothisweaknessinthepreparationof
manyDLIteachers.
• Hernándezcalledout“society’sbiasforthelanguageofprestigein
education[whichis]compoundedbyaweakideologicalstanceon
bilingualismandbiliteracy.”Thisleadstowardabiasfor50/50versus
90/10instruction,whichnotonlyshortchangesthenativelanguage
educationofELstudentsbuthasbeenshowntohaveweakeroutcomes
forall.ShealsourgedanemphasisonDLIpre-schooleducationascritical
forstudents’identityandnativelanguagedevelopment.
• Hernándezurgedadministratorstoattendtobuildingcommunity
especiallyinschoolswhereonlyastrandisdedicatedtoDLIandfeelings
ofneglectorunfairadvantagecanoccur,dividingfacultyandreducing
supportfortheprogram.
ClaudiaCervantes-Soon,Race,SocialJustice,andPowerEquityinDualLanguageEducation
Cervantes-Soontakesonwhatiseffectivelytheelephantintheroom:socialjustice
inprogramsthataredesignedtoattract“advantaged”mainstreamEnglishspeakerswhile
alsoprovidingastrongeducationforimmigrantand“minoritized”students.Sheargues
that,fromanhistoricalperspective,thelanguageminority(LM)studentsshouldbethefirst
-
UCLACivilRightsProject/ProyectoDerechosCiviles,August16,2019www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu
14
priorityforanytwo-wayprogram.Itisthey,sheasserts,whomostneedanddeservea
strongprogramthatservestheirinterestsastheyhavebeenhistoricallyundervaluedand
underservedbytheeducationsystem.Shearguesthatbilingualeducationhaseffectively
been“hijacked”byDualLanguageprogramsthatoftenservetheinterestsofthepowerful
majoritystudentsattheexpenseoftheminoritizedstudents.Shenotes“thewaysinwhich
neoliberalpolicies,globaleconomicinterests,andemphasisondevelopinghumancapital
havebecomethemoralcompassguidingtheseprograms.”Thatis,theyhavelosttheir
moralcompassandtradeditinforalinguisticcommodity.
Cervantes-SoonfirstnotedtheequitableoutcomesthatLMstudentsaresupposed
toderivefromDLIprograms,includingincreasedacademicachievement,decreased
segregation,additivebilingualism,strengthenedsenseofidentityandgreaterengagement
offamiliesinstudents’learning.Shethenarguesthattheseoutcomesoftendonot
materializebecauseofhegemonicWhitenessandthedominanceofEnglishthroughoutthe
society.TheunrealizedpromiseofDLEisdescribedlargelyasaresultofpoor
implementationofprogramsthatdonotincorporatestrategiesdesignedtocounterthe
inherentbiasinfavorofmajoritywhitestudents.Forexample,programsthatmayseekto
desegregatestudentsbutlackstrategiesforcreatingequalstatuslearningopportunities;
studentsallowedtore-segregatewithintheclassroom.ButCervantes-Soonseesthe
problemasbeingmorethanafailuretoimplementequitablestrategies,shefindsthetotal
lackofasocialjusticeorientationtobeacriticalfactorintheinequitybuiltintomany
programs.
Cervantes-Soonconcedesthatthesocietyasawholeisnotlikelytochangeradically
inthenearfutureandtheseprogramswillhavetocontinuetoexistwithinasocialcontext
-
UCLACivilRightsProject/ProyectoDerechosCiviles,August16,2019www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu
15
thatisfundamentallyunjustinmanyways.Giventhisreality,shearguesfora“fourth
pillar”ofDLE—criticalconsciousness.Thatis,educatorsmustlearntoconstantlyreflect
ontheirpracticeandquestiontheiractionsthroughasocialjusticelens.Beingawareofthe
injusticesthatcanoccurintheDLEclassroomisthefirststep.Thenextstepistohonestly
confrontthewaysinwhichonemaycontributetotheseinequitiesandseektochangeone’s
ownbehaviorinfavorofcreatingamoresociallyjustclassroom.
NelsonFlores,ResponsetoCervantes-Soon
Floreshighlightedthepoliticalnatureoftwo-wayduallanguageprogramsand
critiquedthepresumedneedforwhitestudentstoparticipateintheseprograms,drawinga
parallelwithBrownvBoardofEducationandstrugglesfordesegregation.Hearguedthat
thetwopoliciesaresimilarinthattheyrelyonageneralizedbeliefabouttheminoritized
studentsbeingpsychologicallydamaged,withtheonlycureforthisdamagebeingtomix
themwithwhitestudents.HisprimarythesisappearstobethatLMcommunitiesshould
havethecontrolovertheirownlanguageprogramswithoutconcernfortheparticipation
of“white”students(whichmustbeastandinforanyadvantagedstudents).Heconcludes
thattwo-wayprograms(can)sufferfromneo-liberalideologythatdefinesLMstudentsas
inferiorandneedingtheassistanceofnativeEnglishspeakers.However,totheextentthey
doexistheasserts,asdoesCervantes-Soon,thatitisessentialtodevelopacritical
consciousnesswithinthem.
DeborahPalmer,EquityandDualLanguageImmersion:Curriculum
Palmeropensherpaperwiththestatementthatshewouldaddress“thewaysin
whichboth“whatweteach”and“howweteach”inaTWBEclassroomneedtochangein
ordertobemoreequitable.”Continuingonthethemeofcriticalconsciousnessintroduced
-
UCLACivilRightsProject/ProyectoDerechosCiviles,August16,2019www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu
16
byCervantes-Soon,Palmerarguesthat“TWBEcurriculamustexplicitlyteachcritical
awarenessofoppressionandhegemony,”andcenterthestoriesofmarginalizedgroups
withinthecurriculum.Palmeralsoassertsthatanothertermforcriticalconsciousnessis
“ideologicalclarity,”suggestingthattheeducatorisawareofhisorherownideological
leaningsandthepracticesthatflowfromthesebeliefsorattitudes.Palmermakesthree
recommendationsatthetopofherpaper:
• Equitablecurriculumwithintwo-wayduallanguageprogramsshould
includecontentthatreflectsthestoriesandexperiencesoftheLMstudents.
• Structuringandvaluingtheparticipationofallstudentsintheclassroom
and“centeringoftenmarginalizedinteractionalanddiscoursepatterns”of
minoritizedstudents.(This,bytheway,isnotverydifferentfromthework
ofElizabethCohenandRachelLotan,2004,whodevelopedpedagogical
strategiesfor“equalstatus”classroompracticesandLotan’sextensive
workintheareaofequalstatusforLMstudents.)
• Deliberatelanguageuse,whichincorporatesstudents’everydayuseof
language,suchastranslanguagingandtheuseoflanguagesseparatelyand
together.
Palmerfaultsmonoglossicpractices–therigiduseofonlyonelanguagein
multilingualcontexts,includingassessmentinEnglish--asbeingamajorculpritin
inequitableeducationofLMstudents.Alsonamedasafactorininequitablecurriculumis
thehistoryofbilingualeducationinwhicheducatorswere--andare—oftenforcedintoa
transitionalcurriculuminwhichtheactualgoalwasandisEnglish(monolingualism).Dual
languageprogramscaninterruptthisideologybutthecosttotheLMstudentscanstillbe
-
UCLACivilRightsProject/ProyectoDerechosCiviles,August16,2019www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu
17
highiftheirlanguageisnotgiventhesamevalueasEnglishandthisisnotexplicitinthe
curriculum.
Palmeroffersadiscussionof“translanguaging,”apedagogythathasgainedsome
tractioninbilingualandduallanguageprogramsbuthasalsofosteredagreatdealof
controversyandconfusionaboutwhatismeantbytheterm.AsPalmernotes,itshouldnot
bealanguage“free-for-all”butalongwithdesignatingcertaininstructionalperiodsor
topicstobe“Spanishfocus”and“Englishfocus,”schoolsmightexplicitlydesignatea
“translanguaging”or“bilingualfocus”timeduringtheschoolday.Thenotionbehindit,as
explainedbyPalmer,isthatstudentswhoarealreadyusingtwolanguagesintheirdaily
lives,asisincreasinglythesituationinduallanguageandbilingualprograms,shouldnotbe
madetofeelthattheirlinguisticrepertoiresorthattheirdualidentitiesareunacceptable
orinferior.Itiscriticaltocommunicatetostudentsthatallkindsoflanguagepracticesare
legitimateandappropriatefordifferentsituations.Hencethecurriculumshouldbe
designedwiththisinmind.
Finally,Palmeradvocatesforeliminatinghighstakesstandardizedtestsineither
languagebecausetheycannotfullyaccountfortheuniquelybilingualuseoflanguageof
studentsinduallanguageprograms.Shearguesthatassessmentfortheseprogramsmust
bere-thoughttoinclude“alternativeandenrichingformsofassessment,suchasportfolios,
studentrunconferencesandculminatingpresentations.”Thisisacriticalissueforthe
field.
LisaDorner,UncoveringtheHiddenCurriculum:ResponsetoPalmer
ProfessorDorner’sresponsetothePalmerpaperwasprimarilytoreassertthe
importanceofcriticalconsciousnessonthepartofDLIeducatorssothattheirpedagogy
-
UCLACivilRightsProject/ProyectoDerechosCiviles,August16,2019www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu
18
wasoneofempowermentofLMstudents.Hersecondpointwastheimportanceofusing
CriticalDiscourseAnalysis(CDA)tolookforthe“hidden”inthecurriculumandshe
suggestedthatthisshouldbedonewitheveryoneinvolvedintheseprograms,from
administratorstoparents.Whileitwasnotclearhowthiswouldbeconductedinmost
cases(whoinitiates,whodocuments,whotrainseducators,etc),shesuggestedthat
dinnerswithparentsinwhichtheirstoriescouldbetoldandtheirexpectationsofthe
programcouldbeuncoveredwouldbeoneimportantwaytoengageparents.
DorneralsorecommendedBelovedCommunity(https://www.wearebeloved.org),
whichfocusesonhelpingorganizationstoaligntheirpracticestosupportdiversity.The
CEO,RhondaBroussard,waspresentatthemeeting.
MagalyLavadenz,PreparingandSupportingBilingualTeachersforEquityinTwoWayDualLanguageImmersionPrograms:ABilingualEpistemologicalFrameworkforTeaching,ResearchandPolicy
Afterprovidingabriefintroductiontoahistoryofbilingualeducation,uptoand
includingthepassageofProposition58in2016inCalifornia,whichremovedthegeneral
prohibitiononbilingualeducationinCaliforniaandencouragedcommunitiestomount
bilingualandduallanguageprograms,Lavadenzfocusedonthecertificationofteachersfor
bilingualprograms.Shefoundthat“analysisofcurrentstatebilingualcertification
requirementsrevealsthattwenty-threeoutofthefiftystatesandtheDistrictofColumbia
offerbilingualcertification.Ofcourse,thatmeansthatthemajorityofstatesdonotyet
offerthiscertification.Adeeperexamination,however,showsthatstatesdifferbroadlyin
thecriteriarequiredfortheauthorization“includingsomestatesthatsimplyapplyatestof
unknownvaliditytocredentialteachers”withorwithoutanyformaltraininginbilingual
education.
-
UCLACivilRightsProject/ProyectoDerechosCiviles,August16,2019www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu
19
WhileLavadenzarguesthatthereisnoconsensusinthefieldabouthowexactlyto
bestpreparebilingualteacherstoaddresstheburgeoningneed,shenotesthat“advancing
allstudents’capacitiestosucceedinthe21stcenturywillrequirespecialattentionto
closingtheachievementgapandaddressingequityissues.Itwillalsorequireanexpanded
repertoireofliteracyandacademicskillsincludingtechnology,intercultural
communicationandcriticalinquiry.”AmajorproblemLavadenzidentifiesinarrivingat
consensusstandardsorcompetenciesforbilingualteachersisthewithdrawaloffederal
fundsforpreparingbilingualpersonnelinIHE’swhomightconducttherequiredresearch
tobeabletoknowwhichofthesecompetenciesaremostcritical.Thisfundingwas
providedaspartoftheBilingualEducationActuntilitsdisappearanceunderNCLB.
Lavadenzthenassertsthatthebestapproachtounderstandingwhatteachersneed
toknowandbeabletodotosuccessfullyandequitablyeducateLMstudentsshould
borrowfromtheworkofLeeShulmanonPedagogicalContentKnowledge(PCK).PCK
includes“(1)knowledgeofrepresentationsofsubjectmatter(contentknowledge);(2)
understandingofstudents’conceptionsofthesubjectandthelearningandteaching
implicationsthatwereassociatedwiththespecificsubjectmatter;and(3)general
pedagogicalknowledge(orgeneralizedteachingstrategies);(4)curriculumknowledge;(5)
knowledgeofeducationalcontexts;and(6)knowledgeofthepurposesofeducation.”
Lavadenzproposesa7thelement,thatofMultilingualPedagogicalContextKnowledge.
Addingtothissheincludesmultiliteracycompetencies—theabilitytoeffectivelyusetools
suchasmetalinguisticawareness.
InthefinalsectionofthepaperLavadenzdescribesaseriesofinterviews,analysis
ofclassroomobservationsandartifactswith11bilingualteachersoverathree-yearperiod
-
UCLACivilRightsProject/ProyectoDerechosCiviles,August16,2019www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu
20
todemonstratecriticalissuesrelatedtoknowledgeinpractice,orbilingual
epistemologies.Shedescribeshowteachersusecross-culturalknowledgetoadvocate
fortheirstudents,understandingtheirparticularcircumstances.Shedescribeshow
bilingualteachersusetranslinguisticrepertoiresforteachingandstrategiestobring
nativelanguagein“fromthemargins”ofclassroominstruction,includingtheusecognates
asbridgesbetweenEnglishandSpanish.Shethendescribestheuseoftranslanguagingin
theclassroomtorespecttheactualwaysinwhichstudentsusemorethanonelanguagein
naturalcommunication—unlikethemorerigidformsofinstructionthatrequirestrict
separationoflanguages.(Thisisanareaofbilingualpedagogythatisstillunder
considerablediscussion.)Lavadenzalsoprovidesmultipleexamplesofbilingualteachers’
criticalagencyinwhichtheseteachersidentifiedunjustpracticesandbeliefsystemsand
acted,ofteninconcertwiththeirstudents,toaddresstheseinjustices.Inonecasethe
teacherandherclassroombeganacampaigntoincludeacriticaleventinMexican
Americanhistorythathadbeenomittedfromtheirhistorybooks.Thisultimatelyresulted
inalegislativebillthatchangedthestatecurriculum.
Lavadenzendsonanoteabouttheimportanceofpreparingbilingualteachersto
havecriticalconsciousnessabouttheirwork“especiallyinthistime”whensomany
injusticesarebeingexperiencedbystudentsfromimmigrantcommunities.
ShellySpiegel-Coleman,ResponsetoLavadenz
Spiegel-Colemandirectsaconsortiumthatiscomprisedonapproximately20
individualprogressiveorganizationsinCaliforniathatareprimarilyengagedinpromoting
educationalequity.HercommentstoProfessorLavadenz’spaperfocusedonwaysin
whichitcouldbestrengthenedbyincorporatingadditionalconversations,suchas
-
UCLACivilRightsProject/ProyectoDerechosCiviles,August16,2019www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu
21
providingmorediscussionabouttheissueoftranslanguaginginactualpractice.Spiegel-
Colemanquestionstheconclusionthatfailingtorespecttranslanguagingintheclassroom
leadstodenigrationofstudents’identities,orweakerlearning.InherpresentationSpiegel-
ColemanarguedthatthecriticalissueforDLIistherecruitmentandpreparationofhighly
qualifiedbilingualteachersandpointedtowardCalifornia’sTogetherpolicybriefon
BilingualTeacherShortageinCalifornia.Shepointedoutthatthebrief,basedonsurveysof
dozensofdistricts,notesthattherearethousandsofteacherswhocouldqualifyas
bilingualteachersbutthattheyneed–bytheirownadmission—intensiveprofessional
developmenttobereadytoentertheclassroom.This,Spiegel-Colemanarguesiswhere
oureffortsshouldbefocusedasqualityofinstructionisthemostimportantissueforDLI.
SectionIII
Thepaperssucceededinprovokingdiscussionamongparticipants.Itwasclear,
however,thatdiscussionoftheequityininstructionalpracticesintheclassroom
overwhelmedtheconversationandtendedtolimitdialogueonotherequityissues,
particularlythoseraisedbyLindholm-Leary’spaper.Ascanhappeninuncomfortable
conversationsaboutequityandinjustice,somevoicesareheardmoreloudlyand
consistentlythanothers,andsomeappeartobesilenced.Duringtheconcludingdiscussion
weidentifiedanuneasinessamonganumberofparticipantsthatimportantequityissues
hadbeenignored.Forthisreason,weendedthetwo-daymeetingwithanappealto
participantstocompleteaveryshortsurveyexpressingtheiropinionsonafewkey
questionstobemailedoutshortlyaftertheconference.Ourappealwastocaptureall
voicesandensurethatallperspectiveswereultimatelyincorporatedinthefinalreportand
workthatwouldcontinue.Afterseveralgentleremindersvirtuallyallparticipants
-
UCLACivilRightsProject/ProyectoDerechosCiviles,August16,2019www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu
22
responded.Belowisasnapshotoftheresponses,whichrangedfromasinglesentenceto
morethanapage.
1. Inorderofimportance,whatdoyouconsidertobemostimportantandurgentissuesinvolvingequityintwo-wayduallanguageprograms?
Thesingleissuemostoftenraisedbyrespondentswasequityinaccess.Yetall
respondentsdidnotmeanthesamethingbythis.Manyworriedaboutsufficientaccessby
Englishlearners,thatmiddleclassEnglishspeakershavegreateraccesstotheprograms.
Somenotedother“minoritizedstudents,”specialeducationstudents,speakersofother
languages,studentswhowereheritagelanguagespeakersandalsoEnglishspeakers
(IFEPs),andparticularlyAfricanAmericanstudents.Thisconcernwasexpressedbyone
respondentaschangingthenarrativethatallEnglishspeakersarewhite.Buttherewere
alsoconcernsexpressedthatequitableaccessneededtofocusonstudentsfromdifferent
backgrounds(andnotsimplyminoritizedstudents)gainingcross-culturalcompetence.
Otherissuesthatwereraisedbymultiplerespondentsasimportantandurgent
were(1)therecruitmentandpreparationofteachersforwhatisaverycomplexjob;(2)
assessmentthatalignswiththeduallanguagenatureoftheprogramsandthatdoesnot
simplyfocusontheacquisitionofEnglish;(3)participationofallparents,whichrequires
thatprogramsprovideadequateinformationtoallparents.Therewasnotalotmentioned
aboutthemethodsforselectingstudentswhentherearelonglistsofstudentswanting
access.Weknowthistobeachallengeforpractitioners.
2. Whydoyouthinktheissue(s)you’vementionedaresocritical?
Theconcernaboutwhogetsaccesstotheseprogramswasdrivenbycompeting
notionsofgood:“manyofourDLIprogramsarecovetedbymainstreamwhiteEnglish
dominantculture....andshiftstomeettheinterestsofthosestudents”versus
-
UCLACivilRightsProject/ProyectoDerechosCiviles,August16,2019www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu
23
“MultilingualismforALLisamessagethatIbelieveisheretostay.Wecannotreturntothe
daysofbilingualeducationforsome.”Ifbi/multilingualismistobeforall(which,bythe
way,isinherentinCalifornia’snewGlobal2030policy),andthereisalimitedsupply,then
whodeservesitmost?Howdoweequitablyallocatealimitedresource?Thesearethe
questionslurkingbeneaththeconcernsaboutequitableaccessexpressedbyrespondents.
Testingthatdrivespedagogy(especiallystandardizedtestinginEnglishonly)was
namedbyseveralrespondentsasakeyimpedimenttoprovidingequitableeducationforall
students.Assessmentandaccountabilityneedtoreflectthecoredifferencesinthese
programsversusmonolingualEnglishinstruction.
3. Dobestpracticescurrentlyexistthatmighthelpaddresstheseissues?Ifso,pleasedescribethesebestpractices.
Alargenumberofrespondentswereeitherunsureofwhatthesepracticesmightbe
orwereconcernedabouthowwidelyapplicabletheymightbeacrossdifferentcontexts.
However,withrespecttoequityofaccess,severalpeoplementionedlotteriesforadmission
andholdingacertainnumberofseatsforELs.OnerespondentnotedthatCaliforniapolicy
istoadmitnofewerthan40%ELand40%Englishdominantinordertomaintainagood
balanceofthetwogroups.Ofcourse,itisnotclearwherethebilingualstudentfitsintothis
paradigmorwhetherrace/ethnicityshouldbetakenintoaccount,ornot.
Intermsofotherurgentissues,somerespondentsnotedtheimportantresearchon
culturallysustainingpedagogiesandtheopportunitytopressstatesforsomethinglikea
Spanish-Englishteacherlicensureexam.Anotherpracticementionedbymorethanone
respondentwasbetteroutreachto“minority”communitiesandfamilies.Itwasmentioned
thatorganizationsinthestatessuchasCaliforniaAssociationforBilingualEducation
(CABE)offerworkshopsforpractitionersonplanningDLIprograms.Anotherrespondent
-
UCLACivilRightsProject/ProyectoDerechosCiviles,August16,2019www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu
24
offeredthatacompilationofbestpracticesintheliteraturewouldbeausefulcontribution
tothefield.Onerespondentreplied“Ofcoursetherearebestpracticesbutthereisno
consensusaboutwhattheyare.”
4. Whatequityissueswerenotraisedduringtheforumthatshouldhavebeen?
Manyrespondentscouldnotthinkofanimportantissuethatwasnotraised,
howeveramongthosethatofferedanissue,theseincluded:
• Raceandthecriticalroleitplaysinallofeducation,inparticularwithrespect
toduallanguageeducation
• Transportation(thiswasnotelaboratedonbutisknowntobeamajorissue
inequityofaccesstoanykindofmagnetprogram)
• RuralschoolsattemptingtoestablishDLIprograms
• Theimpactofimmigrationenforcementontheseprograms
• LatearrivingELsandaccesstotheseprograms
• Funding,e.g.,howtousefederalfundsfortheseprograms
• ResearchonculturallyresponsiveDLIprogramsforAfricanAmericansand
other“globalmajority”students
TheissueofDLIasatoolfordesegregation,whileraisedbysome,wasnotdiscussedinany
depthduringtheforum,somethingthatsurprisedtheorganizerswhohadseenthisasa
keyissueandpotentiallypowerfuloutcome.Noonementioneditasnumber1or2urgent
orimportantissues.
-
UCLACivilRightsProject/ProyectoDerechosCiviles,August16,2019www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu
25
5. Whatdoyouseeascriticalworkthatneedstobedonebyresearchersandpractitionerstoaddressthemostimportantissues?
Twomajorthemeswerementionedinresponsetothisquestion:(1)Morefine-
grainedandlongitudinalresearchonavarietyofoutcomesfortheseprogramsandbetter
understandingofbestpracticeswithdiversestudentsandcontexts;and(2)researchon
bestpracticesforpreparingteachersforDLIprograms.Withrespecttotheformer
respondentsarticulatedaneedforcasestudyresearchtounderstandprocessesaswellas
longitudinaldatacollectiononavarietyofoutcomes,notjusttestscores.Onerespondent
alsosuggestedtyingthisresearchtoothernationalstudiesthatexaminedoutcomesfor
ESSA,forexample.Severalrespondentsmentionedtheneedtohavebetterunderstanding
ofstudents’needsbeyondthearchtypesofLatinoELand“white”Englishspeakers.
Inherentinanumberofresponsesthroughoutthesurveywastheneedtogaina
consensusonthecriticalcompetenciesforDLIteachersbeforeitwillbepossibletodefine
bestpracticesforteacherpreparation.Someworkexistsnowinthisarena(e.g.,Faltis&
Valdés,2016;Menken&Antuñez,2001),butthisislargelyreviewsofexpertopinionsand
perspectivesratherthanempiricalstudies.Empiricalresearchoncriticalcompetenciesfor
thesub-fieldofduallanguagelearningwithinthebroadercontextofbilingualeducation
couldmovethefieldforward.
6. Therewasdiscussionofwhattocallspeakersofotherlanguages(ELs).Doyouhavepreferredterminology?
Thereappearstobeagrowingconsensusthatitistimetocomeupwithabetter
wayofdescribingstudentslearningintwolanguagesthantheterm“EnglishLearners,’
whichonlydescribeswhattheydonotpossess—English—ratherthanamoreassets-
basedtermthatreflectswhattheyDOhave—atleastoneotherlanguageinadditionto
-
UCLACivilRightsProject/ProyectoDerechosCiviles,August16,2019www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu
26
theonetheyarelearning.Thisisespeciallytrueforstudentswhoareindeedlearning
intwolanguages.However,therewasnoconsensusatallonabetterlabel.Asmany
respondentsrepliedtheyhadnoideasinthisregardasofferedasuggestion.Many
statedforbureaucraticpurposesitwassimplyeasiertostickwithEL,whileanequal
numbersuggestedtermssuchasbilinguallearner,multilinguallearner,emergent
bilingual,duallanguagelearner(whichhasbeenwidelyadoptedamongpre-school
practitioners).ItwouldappearthatthefieldwillprobablystickwithELforthetime
being,untilabroaderconsensusformsaroundsomenewterminology.Butlabelscan
bepowerfulinframingbeliefsystemsandthisshouldremainanareaofactivedebate
asitcanchangecommonperceptionsofthevalueofmultilingualismandthe
individualswhopracticeit.
SectionIV:Conclusions
Thereasonableexpectationisthatthefirsttwo-daynationalforumonequityand
duallanguagewouldintroduceandinitiateconstructivediscussionofthechallenges
inherentincreatingequitabletwo-wayduallanguageprogramsforstudentsofwidely
varyingbackgroundsattendingschoolsinverydiversecontexts.Fromallaccountsthe
Forumsuccessfullyaddressedthisexpectation.Mostparticipantsnotedthattheyfeltit
representedanimportantfirststepandthatsucheffortsshouldcontinueastheyprovidea
venueforairingconcernsandjointlyaddressingamoresystematicresearchand
implementationagenda.Guidedbysubstantialevidencefromresearcher-practitioner
partnerships,weunderscoretheimportanceoflong-term,mutuallybeneficial
collaborationsthatbridgethegapbetweenresearch,policyandpractice.Therewasa
distinctsenseamongsomeoftheparticipants,includinganumberofpractitioners,thattoo
-
UCLACivilRightsProject/ProyectoDerechosCiviles,August16,2019www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu
27
muchtimewasspenton“whitehegemony”and/ornotenoughtimewasspentonanumber
ofpracticalissuesinvolvedinbuildingequitableprograms:howtoimplementthe
programsinawaythat“doesn’toverplayourhandandresultinlosingsupporters.”Butthe
organizersareinagreementthatthismustbeaprocess,startingwithsettingthetableand
acknowledgingthedebatesthatexist.
Movingforward,weareconfidentthattheforuminitiatedanimportantstepinthe
processofaddressingequityissuesinDLI.Toooftenthereisadisconnectbetween
academicresearchersandpractitioners.AsDLIcontinuestoexpanditwillbechallengedby
anumberofcriticalequityissuesanditisimportantthatthesebevettedinaproductive
andopenenvironment.Consequently,itisourbeliefthatnextstepsmustfollowfromthis
forum:
1. Thereisaneedforacensusonhowmany,ofwhatkind,andwherethese
programsexist.Thereispresentlynosuchinformationavailable,makingit
difficulttoknowtheirvariationortheirimpact.
2. TeacherDevelopment.Perhapsthemostseriousthreattothelong-term
viabilityofDLIisteacherrecruitment,preparationandprofessional
development.UniversityteacherprogramsmustworkmorecloselywithDLI
programstoidentifyapproachestoteacherpreparationthatmitigatesomeof
theissuesinherentinteachingaculturally,racially,andlinguisticallydiverse
classroom.
3. Giventhehugedemandfortheseprogramsacrossthecountryitwouldbevery
usefultocreateanetworkthatcanbeaclearinghouseofinformationontopicsof
equityinDLIthatcanbeeasilyaccessedasprogramsareunderdevelopment.
-
UCLACivilRightsProject/ProyectoDerechosCiviles,August16,2019www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu
28
4. EqualAccesstoPrograms.DLIprogramsstruggletobalancethedemandsfrom
advantagedanddisadvantagedparentsforaccesstoprograms.Bestpractices
needtobedevelopedtoensurethatprogramsremainbalancedandthataccess
byminoritizedstudentsisprotected.
5. SchoolandSchoolDistrictIntegration.Thedecisionmadebyaschooldistrictto
developandimplementTWDLIprogramsrepresentsaconsciousintentto
addressinclusiveness.WhereTWDLIprogramsaredeveloped,wheretheyare
placedandhowtheyarestructuredhasamajorimpactonschool,districtand
neighborhooddemographics.DLIremainsapowerfultooltohelpreversea
serioustrendtowardsegregationofournation’spublicschools,primarilyamong
LatinxbutalsoAfrica-Americanchildren.Muchtoolittleisknownabouthow
DLIcanandhasimpacteddemographicsandhowitcanbeeffectivelyappliedto
createmoreinclusiveanddiverseschools.
-
UCLACivilRightsProject/ProyectoDerechosCiviles,August16,2019www.civilrightsproject.ucla.edu
29
References
Cohen,E.G.&Lotan,R.(2004)EquityinHeterogeneousClassrooms,inBanksand
Banks(Eds.),HandbookforMulticulturalEducation,SecondEdition,Jossey-Bass.Pp.736-
750.
Faltis,C.&Valdés,G.(2016).Preparingteacherstoteachinandadvocatefor
linguisticallydiverseclassrooms:Avademecumforteachereducators.InD.H.Gitomer&
C.A.Bell(Eds.),Handbookofresearchonteaching(5thed.,pp.549–592).Washington,DC:
AmericanEducationalResearchAssociation.
Menken,K.,&Antuñez,B.(2001).Anoverviewofthepreparationandcertificationof
teachersworkingwithlimitedEnglishproficient(LEP)students.Washing,D.C.:National
ClearinghouseforBilingualEducation