Transcript
Page 1: ADA Discussion  Paper Series ADA Discussion Paper No.2

[email protected] www.e-mfp.eu

ADA Discussion Paper Series

ADA Discussion Paper No.2 It looks at 7 top MIVs and their outstanding amounts

to MFIs in the years 2007, 2008, 2009 It finds a concentration of funds in the larger,

older and more mature MFIs It discusses the possible consequences of this

concentration for the microfinance sector

Page 2: ADA Discussion  Paper Series ADA Discussion Paper No.2

[email protected] www.e-mfp.eu

The average outstanding amount of the 7 top MIVs lay at 2.63 million USD in 2007, at 3.10 million USD in 2008 and at 2.78 million USD in 2009.

2007 2008 2009

Number of MFIs funded 405 508 574

Total outstanding amount to MFIs (in thousand USD)

1,066,296 1,573,240 1,597,321

Average outstanding amount to MFIs (in thousand USD)

2,633 3,097 2,783

Page 3: ADA Discussion  Paper Series ADA Discussion Paper No.2

[email protected] www.e-mfp.eu

In each year, about 86% of the total outstanding amounts went to the first 250 MFIs, 10% to the next 150 MFIs and only 4% to the remaining MFIs.

Years

To

tal o

uts

tan

din

g a

mo

un

ts

(in

th

ou

san

d U

SD

)

86.13%

86.83% 85.35%

9.56%9.59% 9.78%

4.31% 3.58% 4.87%

Page 4: ADA Discussion  Paper Series ADA Discussion Paper No.2

[email protected] www.e-mfp.eu

Past performance and future potential of large and more mature MFIs is easier and cheaper to evaluate.

Funding of smaller and less mature MFIs seems,and often is, more risky.

Larger, more mature MFIs might grow even faster, but might also become less strict in their analysis and follow-up of projects (riskier loans, consumer loans, loans for other non-productive purposes > over-indebtedness).

There remain less opportunities for smaller, less mature MFIs to grow and to become more competitive.

Page 5: ADA Discussion  Paper Series ADA Discussion Paper No.2

[email protected] www.e-mfp.eu

Approach of MFIs with different criteria

Establishment of more MIVs with a structure that allows for a better risk management (one class of shares guaranteeing another classes of shares) and which allows for the taking of more risks

Facilitation of the access to ratings for high potential newcomers, fostering of co-funding initiatives (investors paying for information contained in the ratings?)

Complementation of financial support, especially of the smaller, less mature MFIs, by technical support or capacity building measures


Top Related