Academic Planning
Town Hall Meeting
April 20, 2004
WOO-HOO!
University of Cincinnati:Leading in the 21st Century
Lawrence Johnson, Dean,College of Education, Criminal
Justice and Human Services
Input Session OutputInput Session Output
Summary of Input Session dataSummary of Input Session data
83 input sessions have been completed as of today– 56 1st round input sessions– 27 2nd round input sessions
Over 2,400 individuals have participated in input sessions (students, alumni, faculty, administrators, community leaders)– 1,817 1st round– 583 2nd round
Summary of Input Session data Summary of Input Session data (continued)(continued)
Over 325 individuals have provided written feedback
More than 24,200 page views on the academic planning Web site
Over 800 pages of notes and feedback generated
TH Scores Items 1 and 2
2.22.32.42.52.62.72.82.9
33.13.23.33.4
Overall Rating Facilit/Arrange.
Scor
eTH 2
TH 3
TH 4
TH 5
TH 6
TH 7
4 Point Scale – 1= Poor; 2 = Satisfactory; 3 = Very Good; and 4 = Outstanding
TH and IS Scores Items 1 and 2
2.22.32.42.52.62.72.82.9
33.13.23.33.4
Overall Rating Facilit/Arrange.
Scor
e TH Overall
IS Round 1
IS Round 2
4 Point Scale – 1= Poor; 2 = Satisfactory; 3 = Very Good; and 4 = Outstanding
TH Scores Items 3 - 7
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
Item 3 Item 4 Item 5 Item 6 Item 7
Scor
e
TH 2
TH 3
TH 4
TH 5
TH 6
TH 7
3. Activity appropriate given stage of process; 4. Comfort in expressing ideas; 5. Ideas accurately incorporated; 6. Facilitator evaluation; 7. The CAP Process is progressing as I expected
6 Point Scale – 1 = Strongly Disagree; 6 = Strongly Agree
TH and IS Scores Items 3 - 7
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
Item 3 Item 4 Item 5 Item 6 Item 7
Scor
e TH Overall
IS Round 1
IS Round 23. Activity appropriate given stage of process; 4. Comfort in expressing ideas; 5. Ideas accurately incorporated; 6. Facilitator evaluation; 7. The CAP Process is progressing as I expected
6 Point Scale – 1 = Strongly Disagree; 6 = Strongly Agree
Overall Aggregate Score: Items 3 - 7
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
TH 2 TH 3 TH 4 TH 5 TH 6 TH 7
Sco
re
6 Point Scale – 1 = Strongly Disagree; 6 = Strongly Agree
Overall Aggregate Score: Items 3 - 7
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
IS Round 1 IS Round 2
Sco
re
6 Point Scale – 1 = Strongly Disagree; 6 = Strongly Agree
James Tucker, Vice President for Administrative
& Business Services
Quick Wins/Stupid PoliciesQuick Wins/Stupid Policies
UCUC Quick Wins HighlightsQuick Wins Highlights
Quick Wins + Stupid Policies Inclusive Process
– Solicited and received suggestions from across the institution, from all levels
– Received suggestions from Action Teams– Over 200 submittals
UCUC Quick Wins HighlightsQuick Wins Highlights
Criteria for evaluating suggestions:– Result would positively impact key
stakeholder groups– Could be resolved or action steps taken by
May 2004– Would result in a positive Return on
Investment
Connections to Action Teams and QSI
Student-Centered Quick WinsStudent-Centered Quick Wins
You See Problems UC Solutions
1. Improve priority registration Early/Continuous Registration; real time (4/04)
2. We don’t do enough for the best students 4.0 Club (6/04)
3. Degree audits are process and paper intensive Degree Progress Audits on Web (6/30/04)
Student-Centered Quick WinsStudent-Centered Quick Wins
You See Problems UC Solutions4. We need more women students in research
Support for Women in Science and Engineering (in progress)
5. Safety on and off campus Extended door-to-door service and late night parking (completed)
6. Streamline fee process for thesis/dissertation publication Single fee (in progress)
Student-Centered Quick WinsStudent-Centered Quick Wins
You See Problems UC SolutionsLonger-term:
Make services and processes for students easier, more convenient, paperless Web posting of grades
Credit card payment
Real-time bills
Other Web enhancements
Research/Academic Excellence Research/Academic Excellence Quick WinsQuick Wins
You See Problems UC Solutions
1. Center for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning lacks home CET&L space in Langsam Library (5/04)
2. We need to do more to recruit and retain best talent UC Advantage Program (5/04)
Community/Partnership Quick WinsCommunity/Partnership Quick Wins
You See Problems UC Solutions1. Public does not know extent of UC’s
community involvement, nor whom to contact UC Community Connections searchable database (5/04)
2. Find way to extend relationship with alumni Grads retain UC email address (TBD)
3. Many units not prepared or resourced to manage community events, meetings UC “Hospitality” Office (TBD)
Infrastructure Quick WinsInfrastructure Quick Wins
You See Problems UC Solutions1. University organization unclear to many
employees Organizational chart online; link from president’s office (completed)
2. University needs easy, consistent way to handle all elections Web-based Election Center (in progress)
Infrastructure Quick WinsInfrastructure Quick Wins
You See Problems UC Solutions
3. Frequently requested HR forms are only available in paper HR Forms Online (5/04)
4. Make it easier to place and check status of work orders Work Orders Online (Summer 04)
5. Human resources functions need to be streamlined and consolidated HR Service Center; one-stop model (in progress)
Quick Wins ImplementationQuick Wins Implementation
UC Quick Wins: Some completed; some in progress; some
need further study Some will be handled by action teams Ongoing QSI support
What Happens Next: TimelineWhat Happens Next: Timeline
ActionBegins
ActionTeams
ActionTeams
May June July August September
PublicPresentation
ActionTeams
Review Refine Plan Execute
What Happens Next: This SummerWhat Happens Next: This Summer
“Document” written and editedLarry Johnson and Marianne
Kunnen-Jones will serve as editorsAction Team co-chairs will assist in
writingOther communicators will be asked to
be “second, third set” of eyesPublish on Web by August
What Happens Next: This SummerWhat Happens Next: This Summer
Form a committee to manage UC|21 going forward
Retreat with Cabinet, Deans in September
Ships: Our Value Statement
Clusters/Standard of Excellence: Our Goals
Inauguration: UC|21 BrochureInauguration: UC|21 Brochure