-
INFORMATION TO USERS
This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer.
The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction.
In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
ProQuest Information and Learning 300 North Zeeb Road. Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 USA
800-521-0600
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
NOTE TO USERS
Copyrighted materials in this document have not been filmed at the request of the author. They are
available for consultation at the authors university library.
Appendices A through F Pages 95*118
This reproduction is the best copy available.
UMI'
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
A Study of Situational Leadership Theory in a Distribution Corporation
ByCorinne A. D. Patrick
A DISSERTATION
Submitted to School of Business and Entrepreneurship
Nova Southeastern University
in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
DOCTOR OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
2002
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
UMI Number: 3058557
Copyright 2002 by Patrick, Corinne Angela Deborah
All rights reserved.
__ _
UMIUMI Microform 3058557
Copyright 2002 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company. All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against
unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code.
ProQuest Information and Learning Company 300 North Zeeb Road
P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
A Dissertation entitled
A Study of Situational Leadership Theory in a Distribution Corporation
By
Corinne A. D. Patrick
We hereby certify that this Dissertation submitted by Corinne A. D. Patrick conforms to acceptable standards, and as such is fully adequate in scope and quality. It is therefore approved as the fulfillment of the Dissertation requirements for the degree of Doctor of Public Administration.
Approved:
Edward Pierce, D.B.A. Chairperson
?//&/>vs#Date
William Hahn, D.B.A. Committee Member
Date
PedroF .Pellet, Ph.D. Committee Member
Mte-
Joseph l/. Balloun; Ph.D. Date 7L .
tctplt of Doctoral Research
I'iM jJ. /Breston Jones, D.B.A. DateAssociate Dfeen, The Wayne Huizenga Graduate School of Business and Entrepreneurship
Nova Southeastern University 2002
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
ABSTRACT
A STUDY OF SITUATIONAL LEADERSHIP THEORY IN A DISTRIBUTION CORPORATION
by
Corinne A. D. Patrick
The focus of this research is an analysis in a distribution corporation of supervisors and managers in a third party logistics company. Specific goals of the study were to (a) determine the primary leadership style, (b) to determine the secondary leadership style, (c) determine the style adaptability levels compared to the support and operations groups, (d) determine the style adaptability and compare to the leader vs. the his/hers peers, subordinates and superiors, and (e) to determine style adaptability compared with subordinates in the two groups, support and operations.
The LEAD Self (Hersey & Blanchard, 1996) was used to measure self-perception of four aspects of leader behavior,(a) primary style, (b) secondary style, (c) style range, and (d) style adaptability. The LEAD-Others was used to measure the others-perception of four aspects of leader behavior (a) primary style, (b) secondary style, (c) style range, and (d) style adaptability as perceived by the leaders peers, subordinates, and superiors.
There were 160 LEAD Other surveys issued to subordinates, peers, and superiors. There were 41 LEAD Self surveys, issued to the leaders (13 managers and 28 supervisors). There were seven managers and 11 supervisors from the support function, and six managers and 17 supervisors from the operation group. The findings of the survey show that over 75% of the personnel surveyed fell into the two categories.
According to Situational Leadership Theory, leaders whose scores place the majority of their responses in Styles 1 and 2 tend to be able to raise and lower their relationship behavior but often feel uncomfortable unless they are "calling the shots." These leaders often project in interviews that "no one can do things as well as I can," which often becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. Leader
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
CERTIFICATION STATEMENT
I hereby certify that this paper constitutes my own
product, that where the language of others is set forth,
quotation marks so indicate, and that appropriate credit is
given where I have used the language, ideas, expressions or
writing of another.
SignedCorinne A. D. Patrick
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I want to express my sincere appreciation to all of those who participated in and provided support to me through this academic endeavor. A special thanks goes to my husband, Michael Patrick Sr., for the support and love that he has shown during this process.
I want to thank my chair, Dr. Edward Pierce, for offering initial encouragement, inspiration, technical support, and competence and for being available to me. I would also like to thank Dr. William Hahn and Dr. Pedro Pellet for their insightful comments, cooperation, and support throughout this study.
I would like to acknowledge my co-workers and upper management for their support and patience in completing the survey used for this study. I want to express my heartfelt appreciation to my manager, Richard Dombroski; without his constant support and encouragement, this would not have been possible.
Finally, I would like to acknowledge my family and friends for supporting and encouraging me to undertake and fulfill this educational endeavor.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
TABLE OF CONTENTS
List of Tables........................................... vii
List of Figures......................................... viii
Chapter
I INTRODUCTION............................................. 1
Background...............................................1Purpose of the Study.................................... 5Theory to be Tested..................................... 6Limitations of the Study................................7Preliminary Research Questions..........................8Significance of the Research............................9Definition of Terms.................................... 10
II LITERATURE REVIEW...................................... 16
Ohio State Leadership Studies..........................18University of Michigan Leadership Studies............. 19Two Independent Dimension of Leadership............... 213-D Management Style Theory............................22Contingency Theory..................................... 28Path-Goal Theory....................................... 31Immaturity - Maturity Theory..........................32Situational Leadership Theory..........................34
Basic C o n c e p t s ...............................35The Basic Model................................39
Research Testing the T h e o r y ......................... 42Summary................................................ 54
III METHODOLOGY........................................... 56
Research Variables..................................... 56Conceptual Framework................................... 57Research Questions and Hypotheses..................... 58Demographic Data....................................... 61Instruments............................................ 62Situational Leadership Theory..........................64Research Domain........................................ 65Population and Sample Size.............................66Data Gathering Instrument and Technique............... 67
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
Table of Contents (Continued)
Page
IV ANALYSIS AND PRESENTATION OF FINDINGS................. 69
Composite Profile & Style/Readiness............... 69Research Variables................................. 72Response Rate...................................... 72Conceptual Framework...............................73
Hypothesis testing..................................... 75
V SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS................................. 85
Results of Hypotheses Testing..........................86Discussion..............................................91
Limitations of Study...............................91Implications for Future Study..........................92
Appendix...................................................94
A. LEAD Self Survey.....................................95B. LEAD Other Survey.....................................99C. The Style Readiness Matrix.......................... 103D. LEAD Directions...................................... 105E. The SLT Model........................................ 113F. 360-Degree Leadership Style Feedback/Composite
Profile/Interpreting your Results.................. 115G. Analysis of Variables............................... 118H. Additional Hypotheses Tables ...................... 120I. Authorization to use LEAD Self & Other Survey. . . 124
REFERENCES................................................125
BIBLIOGRAPHY........................................... 130
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1. Cluster Membership.............................. 77
2. Pearson Correlation............................ 7 9
3. Whitney-Mann Test............................... 81
4. Test Statistics..................................81
5. Whitney-Mann Test............................... 83
6. Krus leal-Wall is Ranks by Distance................83
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page
1. The Ohio State University Leadership Quadrants . 19
2. Reddin's Complete 3-D Leadership Style............ 27
3. Leadership Style appropriate for various readiness levels.................................. 31
4. Four Levels of Readiness in the Situational Leadership Theory................................. 64
5. Four Levels of Readiness in the Situational Leadership Theory................................. 75
viii
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
Background
Throughout history, people have been captivated with
the ways in which leaders persuade groups of people,
organizations, and even governments to fulfill certain
objectives and to meet specific goals. This captivation
increased researchers' desire to understand effective
leadership, which resulted in a vast amount of literature
on the subject. This research has continually defined and
redefined effective leadership in many ways throughout the
years (Podsakoff, Niehoff, MacKenzie, & Williams, 1993).
In the 1940s, research on leadership concentrated
primarily on the personality characteristics of the
individual. Toward the late 1950s and 1960s, physical
attributes and the behavior of leaders were also considered
as focal points for leadership. Using this focus,
researchers identified different dimensions of leadership.
These dimensions include examinations of distinguishable
1
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
2behavior, leadership training, reward and punishment, and
charismatic and transformational leadership behaviors.
In the 1970s and 1980s, the situational and
contingency approaches of the 1960s brought about a
comprehensive approach in which traits or personality
variables, task orientations and structure, leader-follower
relationships, and situational contexts were all measurable
variables through which a leader's effectiveness could be
examined (Podsakoff, Niehoff, MacKenzie, & Williams, 1993).
Contemporary approaches to leadership research have
concentrated on a blend of variables compiled throughout
the years. Now, not only does this research emphasize the
cognitive effects of leaders on their followers but also
their influence on the organization as a whole through
structural, multicultural, and performance measures.
For the present study, leadership can be defined as a
process of noncoercive social influence, whereby a leader
guides the activities and members of a group toward shared
objectives and goals in an organization. Simply put, the
key to being an efficient manager is effective leadership
(Hersey, Blanchard, & Johnson 1996). The concepts of
behavioral science are well intended but often fall short
of the mark. While many researchers have brought forth
good ideas, many have had difficulty in putting the ideas
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
3into practice. When studying leader influence, the
behavior of others should not be thought of as a single
event. There is no single formula to apply in every
situation; like any other skill, leadership effectiveness
increases the more one understands and engages in
leadership skills.
Managerial leadership is an interactive relationship
between a leader and a follower in which the leader
attempts to influence the follower to accomplish an
organizational goal or perform a task (Bass & Stodgill,
1990) . Leadership is any attempt to influence the behavior
of another individual or group according to Hersey et al.
(1996) . Hersey et al. refer to leadership as the function
of accomplishing tasks and reaching goals through the
efforts of other people, whereas management is working with
and through others to accomplish organizational goals.
Leadership is considered a much broader concept than
management. According to Hersey et al. (1996), "one can
have a different objective in mind when one attempts to
influence other people" (p.229). Since management is a
special form of leadership that involves the goals of an
organization, consideration should be given to the impact
on the people being influenced. Hersey et al. explain that
in management, the difference between successful and
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
4effective leadership attempts often explains why many
supervisors can get results when they are right there
looking over the worker's shoulder. However, as soon as
they leave, output declines, and often such things as
horseplay and scrap loss increase.
According to Hersey, Blanchard, and Johnson, (2001)
"to bridge the gap between one-time success and long-term
effectiveness, one needs to develop three skills in working
with people" (p. 124). These three skills often determine
whether leadership attempts will be successful or
unsuccessful, effective or ineffective. Understanding what
motivates people, predicting how people will behave in
response to leadership attempts, and directing peoples'
behavior are all necessary conditions for effective
leadership to occur.
Leadership takes place in an organization or a group
of two persons or more. It is a process of interaction.
The leader uses a variety of ways to influence group
members to devote themselves to a given goal. Overall,
effectiveness depends upon understanding, predicting, and
influencing the behavior of other people.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
5Purpose of the Study
This research looks at the influence of the match (if
any) of manager leadership style and subordinate
associates' perceptions of the leader. The sample for this
research consists of managers, supervisors, and their
subordinates in a distribution corporation. A stratified
random sampling procedure is used. The study focuses on
determining the extent that variations in levels of
leadership can be explained by the variables historically
used by researchers to describe the Situational Leadership
Theory constructs, maturity and readiness. The constructs,
maturity and readiness, are often used interchangeably. In
explaining the change from maturity to readiness, Hersey et
al. (1996) state "during the 1960s the term, maturity, in
reference to assessing people did not seem offensive; it
does now" (p. 585).
The role of leadership in business is significant.
The purpose of this study is to attempt to understand the
impact of leadership style and the adaptability of the
leader. The process for achieving this aim includes
testing the Situational Leadership Theory. If this is a
valid theory that can be used in the distribution
organization, it will be a useful tool for other
organizations to use to understand the role of leadership
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
6in their organizations and to develop strategies to improve
leadership style.
Theory to be Tested
The theory tested in this study is the Situational
Leadership Theory. The original model for this approach
was suggested by Reddin (1967) and later adapted by Hersey,
Blanchard, and Johnson (2001). Reddin's (1967) 3-
Dimensional Management Style Theory attempts to match one
of three leadership styles to certain work environments
with the goal of increasing employee output. He identifies
two leadership orientations, relationship orientation and
task orientation. The combination of styles suggests the
existence of two different orientations, which are adapted
by leaders according to the work environment. Hersey et
al. (1996) modify this concept of orientations by
suggesting that leadership styles change with a leader's
readiness, as well as with the readiness of an organization
and its work force. By looking at such components as task
and relationship factors and combining the relative
importance of task and relationship with the level of
readiness, Hersey et al. (1996) developed their four-factor
theory of Situational Leadership.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
7The Hersey et al. (1996) model suggests that effective
leaders are those who can accurately diagnose the essential
variables in each leadership situation and adjust their
leadership style to fit the existing conditions. As the
diversity of leadership situations encountered increases,
the leader must possess more sophisticated diagnostic
skills and a broader range of styles.
Limitations of the Study
The study examines the leaders and followers at the
group level. Variations in individual levels of readiness
and leader behavior may be obscured by the generalized
perception of the group's perspective.
The LEAD-Self and LEAD-Other are questionnaires. The
LEAD-Self is used to evaluate the leadership behaviors used
when the leader is engaged in attempts to influence the
actions and attitudes of others. The information gathered
with the LEAD-Self provides insight into the current
strengths of the leader and areas for his or her leadership
skill development. This supplies information about which
leadership behaviors one may use and the extent to which
those behaviors meet the needs of others.
The LEAD-Other is used to profile the leadership
behaviors of a person's perception of the leader. The
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
8information gathered with the LEAD-Other provides insight
into the perception of a leader's attempts to influence.
It supplies information about which leadership behaviors
are used and the extent to which these behaviors match the
needs of others.
Preliminary Research Question
There are three preliminary research questions for
this study. The questions ask: (a) What is the leader's
primary leadership style and what is his or her leadership
adaptability in the distribution corporation? (b) is there
a higher leadership style adaptability score among
subordinates when there is a match of manager leadership
style? and (c) is there a tendency of over-leadership or
under-leadership according to the Readiness Matrix in the
distribution corporation?
The specific research questions are as follows:
1. What is the primary leadership style in a
distribution corporation?
2. What is the secondary leadership style in a
distribution corporation?
3. What is the perception of the leader's
leadership style adaptability in the
distribution corporation?
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
94. Is there a difference between the support
section and the operations section in their
perception of the overall leadership style
adaptability in the distribution
corporation?
5. Is there a difference in the perception of
the followers' leadership style adaptability
between the support section and operations
section?
Significance of the Research
The findings of this study further the understanding
of organizational leadership in a distribution
organization. The research on situational leadership is
limited; this study provides support for the application of
the Situational Leadership Theory in identifying effective
managers in general and in a distribution organization.
This study has special significance in that it focuses on
the culture of the organization and can be expected to
influence significantly the applicability or non
applicability of the Situational Leadership Theory to
organizations. The identification of effective managers is
a critical task facing all organizations, and any tools
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
10
that can be identified and used to facilitate this process
should apply to other organizations.
The theory is often cited as a basis for decision
making. Efforts to validate the study have been limited in
scope and have been, for the most part, largely
inconclusive. In accordance with Hersey et al. (2001),
"Situational Leadership suggests that the higher the level
of task-relevant readiness of an individual or group, the
higher the probability that participation will be an
effective management technology" (p.371).
Definition of Terms
The following terms are defined for the purpose of the
study:
Ability: Ability is the knowledge, experience, or
skill, or all three that an individual or group brings to a
particular task or activity.
Charismatic Leadership: A leader is perceived as
charismatic when followers make attributions of heroic or
extraordinary leadership abilities upon observing certain
behaviors.
Commitment: This demonstrated duty to perform a task.
Confidence: This demonstrated assurance in the
ability to perform a task.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
11
Conscientiousness: Conscientiousness a personality
dimension that describes someone who is responsible,
dependable, persistent, and achievement oriented.
Consideration: This is the extent to which a leader
is likely to have job relationships characterized by mutual
trust, respect for subordinates' ideas, and regard for
their feelings.
Distribution corporation: An organization that
logistically distributes products for a customer.
Experience: This is a demonstrated ability gained
from performing a task.
High probability match: Numbers that appear inside
this diagonal row indicate the leadership style selected
that best matches the readiness level in the situation.
Initiating structure: The extent to which a leader is
likely to define and structure his or her role and those of
the subordinates in the search for goal attainment.
Job readiness: The skills and ability to effectively
perform a job (Hersey et al., 1996).
Job maturity: The skills and ability to effectively
perform a job (Hersey et al., 1996).
Knowledge: This is demonstrated understanding of a
task.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
12
LEAD: The LEAD-Self and LEAD-Other are instruments
developed at the Center for Leadership Studies and designed
to measure three aspects of leadership behavior: (a) style,
(b) flexibility and (c) adaptability.
Leader-member relations: The degrees of confidence,
trust and respect subordinates have in their leader.
Leadership: Bass & Stodgill (1990) define leadership
as the method or process employed by a leader of a group or
organization to influence the group to establish and
subsequently obtain the goals of the group or organization.
Leadership style: This refers to a behavior pattern
an individual uses when trying to influence the activities
of others.
Life Cycle Theory of Leadership: This is the original
name given to Situational Leadership (Hersey & Blanchard,
1969).
Management Style: The supervisor's or manager's
approach to influencing the subordinate to do a specific
job is called management style (Hersey et al. 1997).
Maturity: Maturity is the situational ability and
willingness of the worker to perform the task required
(Hersey et al. 1996).
Match: Match in this research means the match of
leadership style to maturity. The process of matching used
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
13
in this study will mimic the process used in the
Situational Leadership Theory.
Motivation: This is a demonstrated desire to perform
a task.
Over-leadership: This occurs when too much guidance
or direction is provided to followers with higher readiness
levels.
Primary leadership style: This is the behavior
pattern used most often when attempting to influence the
activities of others.
Psychological readiness: Psychological readiness is
the willingness to effectively do a job (Hersey et al.,
2001).
Relationship behavior: The extent to which a leader
leads by communicating with a subordinate, exchanging ideas
with a subordinate, and sharing responsibility for goal
accomplishment.
Relationship-oriented: Leaders tend to perform best
in situations that are intermediate in favorableness.
Secondary leadership style: This is a style that a
leader uses occasionally.
Self-efficacy: The perception of the skill level that
people perceive they have to accomplish a specific task is
described as self-efficacy.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
14
Situational Leadership Theory (SLT): SLT is a
contingency theory that focuses on followers' readiness.
Skill: Demonstrated proficiency in a task is a skill.
Structure: An aspect of leadership in which the
leader initiates structure for subordinates by assigning
tasks, establishing procedures, clarifying expectations,
and scheduling work is considered structure.
Style range: The total number of quadrants in the SLT
model in appendix F which there are two or more responses.
Style adaptability: The degree to which one is able
to vary his or her style appropriately to the readiness
level of a follower in a specific situation.
Subordinate readiness: This refers to the skills and
ability as well as the willingness to effectively do a job
(Hersey et al., 2001).
Task behavior: This is the extent to which a leader
dictates what each follower is to do, where he or she is to
do it, and how it is to be done.
Task-oriented: Leaders tend to perform best in group
situations that are either very favorable or very
unfavorable to the leader.
Under-leadership: This occurs when use of a
participating or delegating leadership style is used with
followers at low levels of readiness.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
15
Willingness: The extent to which an individual or
group has the confidence and commitment is considered
willingness.
Chapter Two reviews the literature. It also covers
the various theories that are used to build the Situational
Leadership Model.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
CHAPTER II
LITERATURE REVIEW
Situational Leadership Theory (SLT) shows the various
stages of development between a leader and a subordinate in
a controlled environment with variable situations that are
crucial to subordinate readiness levels. Leaders must be
able to effectively navigate various situations while
maintaining a steadfast course toward accomplishing
required goals. Thus, they have become quite accustomed to
using much noncoercive influence to guide members of
workgroups toward shared objectives and common goals within
an organization.
Leaders often boost subordinate workers' feelings of
personal ownership and responsibility for the particular
service or product they help provide or produce. This sort
of leadership has become effective as more and more workers
find themselves in job situations that require them to be
self-directed. Because of the need for the more self
motivated type worker, many leaders have had to evaluate
their leadership skills and abilities.
16
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
17
The importance of leadership in the private and public
sector has resulted in a large volume of research, which
attempts to understand and explain leadership. In a review
of literature, Gibb (1969) identifies almost 1,000 studies
on effective leadership, and the field has continued to
grow during the last 30 years. A more recent review
(Hogan, Curphy, & Hogan, 1994) includes some 100 articles
published since 1969.
The study of leadership has been and continues to be a
dominant part of the literature on management and
organization behavior. A review of scholarly research
introduces multiple variations of leadership patterns
varying from individual traits; behaviors; interaction
patterns; role relationships; follower perceptions;
influence over followers; influence on task goals; as
well as influence on the organizations' culture as a
whole. These approaches to leadership are each
embedded with conceptual weaknesses and a dearth of
cogent empirical evidence (Yuki, 1989, p. 87).
Although an understanding of leadership has been
evasive, significant progress has been made in the study of
leadership traits, behavior, power, and situational factors
(Yuki, 1989) . Leadership styles are now being examined
with an emphasis on keeping the variable situations that
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
18
must be overcome in mind, while simultaneously meeting
required goals. This means that leadership has to be
viewed as a multi-faceted responsibility where a leader's
power, influence, and behavior are used favorably and
simultaneously, yet intermittently, as the studies below
well indicate.
Ohio State Leadership Studies
The Ohio State University leadership studies focus
specifically on leadership behaviors. The studies
initiated in 1945 by the Bureau of Business Research at
Ohio State University found that leadership styles vary
considerably among leaders (Hersey, et al. 1996). These
leadership studies are responsible for isolating two
independent dimensions of leadership behavior referred to
as initiating structure and consideration. These two
dimensions were identified from a series of 150 questions
that attempted to describe how a leader behaves (Korman,
1966). The questionnaire is entitled the Leader Behavior
Description Questionnaire (LBDQ) (Korman, 1966). Figure 1
shows the quadrants that were developed for initiating
structure and consideration.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
19
tII2 2 o u AC CD
io
High Relationship
And
Low Task
High Task
and
High Relationship
Low Relationship
And
Low Task
High Task
and
Low Relationship
(low) Task Behavior (high)
Figure 1: The Ohio State University Leadership Quadrants
Source: J.K. Hemphill, Leader Behavior Description (Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University Press, 1950)
University of Michigan Leadership Studies
The Survey Research Center at the University of
Michigan attempts to approach the study of leadership by
locating clusters of characteristics that seem to be
related to each other and to various indicators of
effectiveness. The studies identify two concepts called
the employee centered leadership style and the job-centered
leadership style (Hersey et al., 1996). Leaders who are
described as employee-centered emphasize the relationship
aspect of their job. This type of leader places importance
on relationships in conjunction with job effectiveness
(Reddin, 1967). He or she believes that it is important to
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
20
take an interest in everyone, respecting his or her
individuality and personal needs. Job-centered leaders
emphasize production and the technical aspects of the job.
They tend to relate task orientation and technical skill
with job effectiveness; employees are seen as tools to
accomplish the goals of the organization (Hersey et al.,
2001).
The conclusions of the University of Michigan
leadership studies are that more effective leaders: (a)
tend to give employees support and satisfy employees'
needs; (b) adopt the methods of group supervision and
strategy, and (c) tend to set behavior-oriented goals.
Considering the drawbacks of these conclusions, this
research does not consider situational variables. There is
no evidence to show that leader behavior does change in
different situations (Hersey et al., 2001).
Behavioral theories use leader behavior as a dependent
variable and study its relationship with organizational
effectiveness and task satisfaction. The common problem in
Ohio State University and University of Michigan leadership
studies is the lack of concern for situational factors.
Effective leadership takes place in certain situations or
environments; therefore, situational variables are
necessary factors to consider. Because of the
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
21
methodological weakness of behavioral theories, situational
leadership theories emerged during the 1960s (Hersey et
al., 2001).
Two Independent Dimensions of Leadership
Initiation structure concerns planning as well as
organizing the work and tasks of others (Reddin, 1970) .
This factor is descriptive of the extent to which a leader
goes in initiating and organizing the activities of a group
to define the way the work is to be done. Initiation
structure includes insisting that the group maintains
performance standards, establishes timetables for
accomplishment of tasks, and meets deadlines. The leader
decides in explicit detail what needs to be done and how it
should be done. The leader establishes a chain of command
with clear lines of communication and clear patterns of
work organization. The support provided by the leader is
directed towards defining and structuring the efforts of
subordinates (Bass & Stodgill, 1990).
Consideration is concerned with the leader
establishing and maintaining relationships (Reddin, 1970).
This factor describes the extent to which a leader displays
concern for the welfare of the other members of the group.
This includes expressing appreciation for good work,
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
22
stressing the importance of job satisfaction, maintaining
and strengthening the self-esteem of subordinates by
treating them as equals, making special efforts to help
subordinates feel at ease, being easy to approach, putting
subordinates' suggestions into operation, and obtaining
subordinates' approval on important matters before going
ahead. This leader focuses on building relationships,
establishing friendships, building mutual trust, and
demonstrating interpersonal warmth (Bass & Stodgill, 1990).
3-D Management Style Theory
Reddin (1970) developed his 3-Dimensional Theory of
Leadership Effectiveness (3-D Theory) from the two central
elements of leadership behavior produced by the Ohio State
University Leadership Studies. Reddin developed a four
style typology of task and relationship orientation from
these two elements of behavior. The essence of 3-D Theory
is that the two main elements of leader behavior are tasks
to be accomplished and the relationships with the people
who carry out the tasks. In coordinating tasks, leaders
may emphasize task or relationship behavior in small or
large amounts. Additional aspects of the 3-D Theory are
(a) separated style, (b) dedicated style, (c) related
style, and (d) integrated style.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
23
Separated style consists of low task and low
relationship orientation. Thus, it is separated from both
task orientation and relationship orientation. The
dedicated style describes leaders that use high task
orientation, but low relationship orientation. The related
style describes high relationship orientation and low task
orientation, and the integrated style combines a high
amount of task and relationship orientation.
According to Reddin (1967) neither task nor
relationship orientation can be considered effective or
ineffective until the third dimension, behavior demands of
the given situation, is added. The effectiveness of the
leader is determined by the appropriateness of the leader's
task and relationship orientation to the demands of the
situation. Thus, a leader that displays a no task or
relationship orientation style could be considered
effective if that is what the situation requires. This is
true for each of the four typologies identified. Each
style could be effective or ineffective depending on the
situation. As a result, Reddin expands the four basic
styles of typology to 12 by adding four task and
relationship behaviors that are considered less effective
and four that are considered more effective based on their
appropriateness to the situation (Reddin, 1970).
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
24
The effectiveness of the leader's task and
relationship orientation is based on the leader's ability
to adjust the level of task and relationship behavior to
the demands of the situation (Reddin, 1967). No discrete
combination of task and relationship orientation is
considered more effective than another. Reddin posits that
the effectiveness of any task and relationship behavior is
dependent on the appropriateness of behavior to the demands
of the situation (Reddin, 1970). According to Reddin, to
be effective, a leader needs to know how to read
situations. A situation is comprised of five independent,
all-inclusive elements consisting of organization,
information, technology, subordinates, and superiors
(Reddin, 1970). Though he does not list the leader as one
of the situational elements, the leader is part of the
situation. It is the appropriateness of the leader's
behavior to the situational demands that determines the
effectiveness of the leader's task and relationship style.
Three-D Theory is considered a situational theory that
focuses on both the leader and the follower (Reddin, 1970).
Hersey, Blanchard, and Johnson (1969), in their life
theory of leadership, extend Reddin's leadership findings
by suggesting that leader effectiveness is dependent upon
the readiness level of the follower. "Situational
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
25
leadership is based on an interplay among (1) the amount of
guidance and direction (task behavior) a leader gives; (2)
the amount of socioemotional support (relationship
behavior) a leader provides; and (3) the readiness level
that followers exhibit in performing a specific task,
function, or objective" (Hersey et al., 1996 p. 442). The
authors concur that all situational elements are
significant in influencing the leader's behavior. However,
emphasis is directed toward the leader's behavior with his
or her followers (Hersey et al., 1996). Leader and
follower relationships should not focus solely on
hierarchical relationships (superior and subordinate) but
should include all organizational relationships (superiors,
subordinates, and coworkers) (Hersey et al., 1996). In the
domain of the psychology of power, these hierarchical
relationships can often weaken an organization as the
desire for short-term gains can tend to dominate the
consideration of long-term benefits (Kets de Vries, Loper,
and Doyle, 1994).
Since situational theory reasons no one best way to
influence people exists, Hersey and Blanchard (2001) infer
that the leadership style that should be applied to a given
situation is dependent upon the readiness level of the
follower (Hersey et al., 1996). The authors define
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
26
leadership style as "the behavior of the leader as
perceived by the follower" (Hersey et al., 1996, p. 166).
Hersey, Blanchard, and Johnson (1996) examine leader
behavior using the two separate and distinctive dimensions
previously developed from the Ohio State leadership studies
and expanded by Reddin's (1967) 3-D Theory.
Hersey, Blanchard, and Johnson (1996) created a model
(Figure 2) that resembles the four quadrants advanced by
the Ohio State University studies. They used the term,
task behavior, to represent the initiation of structure
dimension and the term, relationship behavior, to represent
consideration dimension. The four quadrants represent one
of four leadership styles. Each leadership style describes
a behavior pattern that a person will use when attempting
to influence another.
The four basic leadership styles are labeled high task
and high relationship, high task and low relationship, low
task and high relationship, and low task and low
relationship.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
27
Developer Executive
Bureaucrat Benevolentautocrat
More Effective
Related Integrated
DedicatedSeparated
Less Effective
Missionary Compromiser
Deserter Autocrat
Figure 2: Reddin's complete 3-D Leadership Style
Source: Adapted from William J. Reddin (1970) Managerial Effectiveness McGraw Hill Publishers New York.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
28
Contingency Theory
Fiedler (1967) and Fiedler, Chemers, and Mahar (1977)
agree that an effective leader will manage both employee
relations and task requirements of the organization.
Fiedler (1967) developed the contingency theory of
leadership effectiveness suggesting that the performance of
a group is dependent on the interaction of leadership style
and situational favorableness. He defines the
favorableness of a situation as "the degree to which the
situation enables the leader to exert his influence over
this group" (Fiedler, 1967, p.13). There are three major
situational variables, which seem to determine whether a
given situation is favorable to leaders. These include (a)
the leader's personal relationship with the member of the
group, (b) the amount of structure that the group has been
given, and (c) the power and authority that the position
provides (Fiedler, 1967).
Fiedler operationalizes the measurement of leader
behavior through an instrument he calls the Least Preferred
Co-Worker Scale (LPC). Using this instrument, respondents
are asked to describe one person with whom they have worked
very well, as well as one person with whom they have worked
very poorly. The questionnaire asks respondents to rank
the relationships on several polar scales. A total of all
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
29
of the scale scores equals the LPC score. A manager who
exhibits a low LPC score represents an individual with a
task orientation while a high LPC score indicative of a
person who is relationship-oriented (Fiedler, 1967).
The theory attempts to provide an understanding of the
relationship that exists between an effective leadership
style and the readiness level of the group. Readiness is
the ability the follower has to take responsibility for his
or her actions. Subordinate readiness moderates the two
primary aspects of leadership, task and relationship, with
leader effectiveness (Blank, Weitzel, & Green, 1990).
According to contingency theory, as the level of readiness
of the follower continues to increase, the demand for
structure facilitation on the part of the leader decreases,
as does the need for the leader to interact with the group
for socio-emotional support (Blank, Weitzel, & Green,
1990).
Another element labeled, subordinate readiness, also
must be taken into account. Readiness is defined as the
extent to which a follower has the ability and willingness
to accomplish a specific task (Hersey et al., 1996). It is
the responsibility of the leader to assess not only the
readiness of the individual followers, but also of the
group as a whole. All persons tend to be in varying states
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
30
of readiness. So, the leader must possess the skills to
assess the readiness level of the individual follower and
assign responsibilities accordingly, so that the entire
group accomplishes all required assignments (Nadler &
Tushman, 1990) . These skills include setting goals,
establishing standards, defining roles, and assigning
responsibilities. The skills needed to set goals,
establish standards, define roles, and assign
responsibilities are considered structuring skills and are
fundamental to effective leadership (Hersey et al., 1996).
Figure 3 illustrates appropriate leadership styles
corresponding to the four levels of readiness, according to
Hersey's, Blanchard's, and Johnson's (2001) Situational
Leadership Model. The four levels of follower readiness
are matched to the four situational leadership styles
required by the followers.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
31
READINESS LEVEL APPROPRIATE STYLE
R1Low readinessUnable and unwilling or insecure
SITellingHigh task and low relationship behavior
R2Low to Moderate readiness Unable but willing or confidant
S2SellingHigh task and high relationship behavior
R3Moderate to high readiness Able but unwilling or insecure
S3ParticipatingHigh relationship and low task behavior
R4High readinessAble competent and willing confidant
S4DelegatingLow relationship and low task behavior
R1 SI high S2 2nd S3 3rd S4 low probability
R2 S2 high SI 2nd S3 2nd S4 low probability
R3 S3 high s2 2nd S4 2nd SI low probability
R4 S4 high S3 2nd S2 3 rd SI low probability
Figure 3; Leadership styles appropriate for various
Readiness Levels.
Source: Adapted from Paul Hersey and Ken Blanchard, LEAD Questionnaires and Manual (2001).
Path-Goal Theory
According to the Path-Goal Theory (House & Mitchell,
1974), a leader influences a follower's work-goal
accomplishment through "...delegating and assigning tasks
(initiating structure) and being supportive and considerate
of followers' needs (possessing an empathic understanding)"
(p. 81). Before a follower completes a task, the follower
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
32
naturally considers the "...path instrumentality concerning
the rewards forthcoming as a result of work-goal
accomplishment" (House, 1971, p. 322) . When a follower
"...projects that engaging in certain behavior will result
in a desired reward [he or she] will indeed engage in that
behavior" (House, 1971, p. 325). The follower's
performance is further influenced by the follower's
"...ability to accomplish the task, environmental barriers
to completing the task, and the support necessary from
others to complete the task" (House, 1971, p. 325) . The
leader is the one who determines the extent to which work-
goal (task) accomplishment will be "...recognized and
rewarded with such intrinsic and external rewards as
financial increases, promotion, assignment of more
interesting tasks or opportunities for personal growth and
development" (House, 1971, p. 330).
According to House (1971), the level of task clarity
moderates the amount of leader initiating structure and
consideration. The more ambiguous the task is, the greater
is the amount of structure the leader should exhibit.
Immaturity-Maturity Theory
While Chris Argyris was at Yale, he examined
industrial organizations to determine what affect
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
33
management practices have had on individual behavior and
personal growth within the work environment. Argyris (1957)
studied personality trait growth from childhood to
adulthood. He finds that there are seven characteristics
of personality trait growth. These are:
1. People approach an active state of adulthood from a
passive state of childhood.
2. People approach an independent state of adulthood
from a dependent state of childhood.
3. People approach a flexible state of adulthood from
an inflexible state of childhood.
4. People approach ever-lasting and stable interests in
adulthood from capricious and shallow interests in
childhood.
5. People approach a broad mind of adulthood from a
narrow mind of childhood.
6. People approach equal status with others in
adulthood from the subordinate status in family and
society in childhood.
7. People approach self-understanding and self-control
in adulthood from a lack of rational self-
understanding in childhood.
In Argyris research the characteristics discussed
above from Immaturity Maturity (IM) readiness to readiness
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
34
are healthy and on a continuum. They are inhibited and
limited by culture and norms. Argyris states most people
who develop adult-level performance skills or abilities are
unable to be developed to full readiness (Hersey et al.
2001).
Hersey et al., (2001) develop the readiness concepts
of Situational Leadership Theory from Argyris' Maturity-IM
Readiness Theory. They define readiness as the extent to
which a follower demonstrates the ability and willingness
to take responsibility to accomplish a specific task.
According to Zander, Thomas, and Natsoulas (1960) the
quality of readiness includes (a) high and achieved goals,
(b) concern for completion of the task rather than for
rewards, and (c) expectation of feedback from the task
rather than from the attitude. The degree of
accomplishment-task, relative readiness influences follower
willingness to be engaged in a challenging task at a
medium-high level (Hersey et al., 2001).
Situational Leadership Theory
Hersey, Blanchard, and Johnson (1996, 2001) initially
proposed a Life Cycle Theory of Leadership and later
changed the name to Situational Leadership Theory. The
theory is an expanded combination of the Managerial Grid
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
35
Model (Blake & Mouton, 1984), the 3-D Theory of Management
(Reddin, 1970), and the Readiness-IM Theory (Argyris,
1957). Situational Leadership Theory emphasizes the
importance of employee characteristics when a leader
chooses a leadership style. Its basic concepts, the model,
and readiness elements are discussed below.
Basic Concepts
After Hersey and Blanchard (1996) reviewed the Ohio
State University studies of task and relationship-oriented
leadership behavior, they argue that in the future,
researchers not only should recognize these determinant
environmental factors, but they should develop a systematic
model of environmental differences related to leadership
behavior. At the same time, Hersey and Blanchard argue
that there is a curvilinear rather than linear relationship
between leader task and relationship-oriented behavior and
other variables. Situational Leadership Theory exhibits a
curvilinear relationship based on task oriented leader
behavior, relationship-oriented leader behavior, and
readiness (Hersey et al., 2001).
Hersey and Blanchard (1996) add the follower readiness
level to the two leader behavior dimensions of task
orientation and relationship orientation to construct a
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
36
three-dimensional theory. They state that the readiness
level of group members is an effective and important factor
that determines leadership style. Readiness level does not
mean readiness characteristics of an individual or groups
required for task accomplishment. The leader evaluates the
individual and group readiness levels. For example, a
manager may find that one of the subordinates in his or her
department has advanced to a particular level of readiness,
while another subordinate has achieved a different
readiness level. The manager should then adopt different
leadership styles to work with the two subordinates. When
handing over tasks to a subordinate with low readiness, the
manager should have clarified structure, instructed
carefully and specifically, and provided supervision.
Working with a subordinate who is shy and insecure, the
manager should adopt a relationship-oriented leader
behavior. This emphasizes good interaction with the
follower, supporting and helping him or her to develop a
good interpersonal relationship with his or her group, to
be concerned with and to take care of personnel needs. If
the leadership style and readiness level matches,
organizational effectiveness is achieved (Hersey et al.,
2001).
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
37
Hersey and Blanchard (1996) use task behavior and
relationship behavior to describe concepts similar to
initiating structure and consideration in the Ohio State
University studies. These two behaviors make up four
leadership styles:
1. Sl-Telling: This leadership style is characterized
by above-average amounts of task behavior and below-
average amounts of relationship behavior.
2. S2-Selling: This leadership style is characterized
by above-average amounts of both task and
relationship behavior.
3. S3-Participating: This leadership style is
characterized by above-average amounts of
relationship behavior and below-average amounts of
task behavior.
4. S4-Delegating: This leadership style is
characterized by below-average amounts of both
relationship behavior and task behavior (Hersey et
al., 2001).
Readiness levels consist of different combinations of
ability and willingness that people bring to each task.
Responsibility consists of willingness and ability and can
be divided into four levels. Each level represents a
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
38
different combination of follower ability and willingness.
The four levels are defined below:
1. Unable and unwilling to take responsibility: The
follower is unable, insecure, and lacks commitment
and motivation.
2. Unable but willing to take responsibility: The
follower lacks ability but is motivated and works
hard.
3. Able but unwilling to take responsibility: The
follower has the ability to perform a task but is
not willing to use that ability.
4. Able and willing to take responsibility: The
follower has the ability to perform and is committed
or able and confident (Hersey et al., 2001, p. 177).
Task-related readiness includes two factors:
1. Job readiness: This relates to the techniques,
knowledge, and ability necessary for the work in
which a person engages, and
2. Psychological readiness: This relates to a person's
self-confidence and self-respect. When people have
high low job-related readiness, it means that they
have high low-job readiness and high low-
psychological readiness (Hersey et al., 2001).
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
39
The concept of readiness used in the Situational
Leadership Theory refers to job-related readiness. Hersey,
Blanchard, and Johnson (2001) divide readiness into four
levels where (a) R1 equals low job readiness and low
psychological readiness, (b) R2 equals low job readiness
but high psychological readiness, (c) R3 equals high job
readiness and low psychological readiness, and (d) R4
equals high job readiness and high psychological readiness.
The Basic Model
The Situational Leadership Model uses a combination of
four different job-related readiness levels and four basic
leadership styles. The model can be used to assess
follower behavior and to select the most effective
leadership style. For example, two groups of followers
with readiness for accomplishing tasks are at two extremes
respectively. One group has the necessary knowledge,
techniques, confidence, and the dedication to being the R4
level, but another group does not; they belong at the R1
level. When a leader faces R4 followers who have high
ability and willingness to engage in a task, the leader
does not have to give them instruction or use supportive
behavior. They are able and willing to accomplish the
task; the leader may leave them alone. The only thing the
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
40
leader should do is to supervise on a regular basis to make
sure that everything is under control. The followers need
comments from the leader to make sure that their devotion
has been noticed and appreciated (Hersey et al., 2001).
When a leader has R1 followers who have no ability and
willingness to engage in a task, the leader should clearly
tell them what, when, how, and where to accomplish the
task. This does not mean that the leader does not need to
use relationship-oriented leader behavior. The leader
still needs to be supportive and to engage in two-way
communication in order to help followers understand
instructions. The most successful leadership style is when
a high amount of task-oriented behavior and a low amount of
relationship-oriented behavior is exhibited. This is
equivalent to the SI leadership style (Hersey et al.,
2001).
The job-related readiness of some people falls between
the two extremes and is labeled unable but willing (R2).
These people are not capable; they need leader guidance and
instruction. Because they are trying and working hard, the
leader should support their determination. In this case,
the most successful leadership style is a high amount of
task-oriented behavior and relationship-oriented behavior,
using the S2 leadership style (Hersey et al., 2001).
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
41
Readiness level 3 followers are well-equipped with the
necessary knowledge and techniques to accomplish the task
but lack confidence or motivation. They do not need a lot
of guidance and instruction, because they know how to
complete the task. What they do need is encouragement to
build their confidence or discussions with the leader to
work things out or both. In this case, the most successful
leadership style is a low amount of task-oriented behavior
and high amount of relationship-oriented behavior or the S3
leadership style (Hersey et al., 2001).
The complete Situational Leadership Model developed by
Hersey and Blanchard in the late 1960s consists of four
job-related readiness levels and four leadership styles.
These are listed below:
1. Leadership Style 1 (high task and low relationship-
oriented behavior) matched with low readiness.
2. Leadership Style 2 (high task and high
relationship-oriented behavior) matched with low and
medium readiness.
3. Leadership Style 3 (low task and high relationship-
oriented behavior) matched with medium and high
readiness.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
42
4. Leadership Style 4 (low task and low relationship-
oriented behavior) matched with high readiness
(Hersey et al., 2001, p. 182).
Research Testing the Theory
Hambleton and Gumpert (1982) conducted a survey of the
leadership styles used by 159 managers (leaders) as rated
by their subordinate (followers). According to Hambleton
and Gumpert (1982) the results show that 90% of the
managers who were considered high performers were rated by
subordinates as using a selling (high consideration and
high task) or participating (high consideration and low
task) leadership style. This study supports that Hersey's,
Blanchard's, and Johnson's (1996) Situational Leadership
Theory (SLT) when applied correctly results in significant
gain in job performance (Hambleton & Gumpert, 1982).
However, the leader style-follower readiness level only
matched 29% of the time (Hambleton & Gumpert, 1982).
Hambleton and Gumpert (1982) suggest that "little is known
about the requirements for effective leadership" (p.238)
and that the results of Hersey's and Blanchard's (1988) SLT
are promising. They also encourage further research to try
to replicate the findings.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
43
Graeff (1983) examine Hersey's, Blanchard's and
Johnson's (1988) Leader Effectiveness Adaptability
Description "...diagnostic instrument for measuring leader
style, style range, and effectiveness"(p. 289) and
concludes that the instrument is replete with a
contradiction that significantly diminishes the predictive
utility of the instrument. The issue of a reliable
diagnostic instrument is a recurring problem in testing
SLT. Graeff (1983) identifies existing inconsistencies or
contradictions in Hersey's and Blanchard's (1988) LEAD
Instrument for measuring leader style. These
inconsistencies contribute to the model's lack of utility
(Graeff, 1983). Further research of the theory should
include use of reliable diagnostic instruments.
Vecchio (1987) conducts one of the "...first
comprehensive tests of the principles of Situational
Leadership Theory"(p.448). Vecchio studied 303 high school
teachers (followers) and 14 high school principals
(leaders) and found partial support for the SLT. The study
provides strong support for SLT in the area of low follower
readiness requiring high levels of task direction from the
leader (Vecchio, 1987). This is particularly valid for
newly hired teachers. The findings also indicate that
followers at higher levels of readiness respond well to
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
44
moderate levels of task direction and higher amounts of
consideration (Vecchio, 1987). For teachers at the highest
level of readiness the theory is not predictive, as the
amount of task direction is appropriate. However, there is
a need for greater consideration than the leaders exhibited
(Vecchio, 1987) .
From the findings, Vecchio suggests that another
factor, job category, may be predictive of follower
readiness. In this view, low to high levels of readiness
are representative of low to high levels of job categories
(Vecchio, 1987). Followers with low levels of readiness
held jobs that required less skill. As the degree of skill
increased so did the level of follower readiness. Vecchio
(1987) suggests, "SLT should be studied with an across-jobs
perspective and recognizing that high levels of follower
readiness may obviate the need for supervision rather than
specifying a particular style of supervision" (p. 450).
Goodson, McGee, and Cashman (1989) go one step further
than Vecchio (1987) in testing Hersey's, Blanchard's, and
Johnson's SLT. The purpose of their study is to test the
prescriptions for effective leadership as specified in
Hersey's, Blanchard's, and Johnson's (1988) SLT. In
Goodson's et al. study (1989) interactive effects of
leadership style and follower readiness on employee
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
45
perception and attitude are examined. The specific
prescriptions offered by the SLT regarding best, second-
best, third-best, and least effective styles are tested for
all four levels of subordinate readiness. The interaction
between leader behavior (initiating structure and
consideration) and follower readiness hypothesized by the
SLT is not supported. No support was found for the best,
second, third, or least leadership style, but the findings
are more consistent with results obtained in traditional
leadership research.
Vecchio (1987) only studied the best matches of leader
style and follower readiness and those that Hersey,
Blanchard, and Johnson (1988) state have the highest
probability of success. Goodson, McGee, and Cashman (1989)
tested all four styles for each of the four levels of
follower readiness. Their study of 450 employees
(followers) and 85 store managers (leaders) of a national
retail chain indicates that "regardless of the style
predicted to be best, second-best, third-best, and least at
any level of follower readiness selling and participative
styles were consistently associated with higher levels of
satisfaction, while telling and delegating were associated
with lower levels of satisfaction" (Goodson, McGee, &
Cashman, 1989, p. 450). An interesting aspect of
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
46
Goodson's, McGee's, and Cashman's study is that task
behaviors, when combined with supportive behaviors, produce
more positive outcomes suggesting that "consideration was
appropriate for every level of follower readiness" (p.
450). The study further confirms that adaptive behavior is
a necessary function of effective leadership (Goodson,
McGee, & Cashman, 1989).
Goodson's, McGee's, and Cashman's (1989) findings
suggest that followers may need high amounts of
consideration regardless of their readiness level. They
state that the "...implications of their findings [are]
unique to their own sample and the results may not apply to
employees in other types of organizations" (Goodson, McGee,
& Cashman, 1989, p. 458). This warrants further research.
Blank, Weitzel, and Green (1990) examine Hersey's,
Blanchard's, and Johnson's (1988) SLT variable of follower
readiness to determine whether there is a "...difference in
leader effectiveness based on the prescribed relationship
of leader style and follower readiness" (p.584). Their
study examines the underlying assumptions regarding the
theory prescription that subordinates' readiness moderates
the relationship of leader task and relationship behaviors
with indicators of leader effectiveness. The results of
their study of 27 residential hall directors (leaders) of
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
47
353 residential advisors (subordinates) does not support
the basic underlying assumption of Hersey's and Blanchard's
SLT that the readiness level of the follower is predictive
of the amount of task and relationship behavior that the
leader discharges (Blank, Weitzel, & Green, 1990). Their
results do support that follower readiness is "...an
important situational variable to be considered in
leadership research" (Blank, Weitzel, & Green 1990, p.
588) .
Blank, Weitzel and Green (1990) suggest "more research
is needed to clarify the degree of contribution that SLT
makes to the understanding of leadership" (p.596).
Specifically, the situational variable of follower
readiness is the only variable on which Hersey, Blanchard
and Johnson (1988) focus, but there are other situational
factors such as position power, leader-member relations,
etc. that should be the subject of further research (Blank,
Weitzel, & Green, 1990).
Norris and Vecchio (1992) tested Hersey and Banchard's
SLT using 91 nurses. The results of their study provide
little support for predicting leader behavior founded on
worker readiness levels. However, Norris and Vecchio
introduce that although the elements of structure and
consideration are well established, a problem exists in the
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
48
use of reliable instruments to measure leadership style.
Correspondingly, the measurement of the readiness levels of
workers is equally as difficult since it is not as well
established. Norris and Vecchio (1992) suggest that the
"...best form for testing SLT may be on jobs that have
relatively few tasks and that are highly correlated in
terms of performance" (p.334). In their findings, the
relationship between performance and leader-member
exchange, performance and maturity, and performance and
satisfaction with supervision approximate the correlations
that were reported by subordinates. The results of the
hierarchical regression analyses are presented for each of
the three criteria. The inclusion of the three-way
interaction term did not significantly increase the
proportion of criterion variance that could be accounted
for. In short, none of the criteria provide support for
the hypothesized three-way interaction.
Mike Smith (1991) examined the training of situational
leadership with engineering managers. The study focuses on
18 hours of a leadership course, which consisted of 12
hours of lecture/discussion and six hours of data analysis
and various applications. Seven power bases are identified
as potential means from which a leader can successfully
influence behavior. The engineer managers present examples
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
49
of effective use of each power base (Smith, 1991). As in
the distribution corporation, each manager/supervisor
attended a situational leadership training class. Each
year a four-hour refresher course is conducted to ensure
effectiveness of the training.
Cairns, Hollenback, Preziosi, and Snow (1998) focus on
the interaction of the leader's behavior and follower
readiness and then measure it to determine leader
effectiveness. This study of SLT was conducted in an
actual business environment in contrast to a great deal of
previous leadership studies that use an academic laboratory
setting (Kets de Vries et al., 1994). Cairns' et al. study
consists of senior level leaders and followers in service
and manufacturing businesses of large Fortune 100
companies.
The results of the Cains et al. study provide
significant correlation coefficients, which suggest that
the observed independent variables are consistent with each
other. Additionally, a summary of regression analyses
shows the results of the hierarchical regression analysis
with analysis on variance on the independent variables
(initiating structure, consideration, and follower
readiness) and the resultant examination of the
significance of these three variables on the performance
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
50
criteria. The results of omnibus tests reveal no
statistical differences at the alpha. Finally, results of
partitioned tests indicate statistical differences at the
high readiness level, but the mean differences are in the
opposite direction of SLT. The mean differences at the low
readiness level are in the direction of SLT. The study
provide more understanding about SLT and the concept of
matching.
Vries, Roe, and Taillieu (1998) studied the impact of
supervision leadership effectiveness on organizational
behavior. They focus on two studies of insurance agents in
the Netherlands. Moderated regression analysis shows that
need for supervision moderates the relationship between
task-oriented leadership and work stress but not between
task-oriented leadership and job satisfaction.
Miriam Johnson (1998) explored the SLT on staff
interaction with children and youth in the child care
industry and SLT effectiveness in residential group care
settings. Four leadership styles were used to determine
SLT effectiveness. According to her findings, the model
has been criticized for assuming that each subordinate in
the work group is functioning at the same level. Johnson
suggests that in actual work situations the heterogeneity
of followers' readiness might adversely affect a manager's
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
51
ability to follow the prescriptions of the Situational
Leadership Model. The benefits of the model are: (a)
increased awareness by staff members of their own preferred
leadership style and an interest in learning and practicing
other styles; (b) appreciation of the value of others
preferred styles; (c) increased sensitivity to the changing
needs of clients, both as individuals and as groups; and
(d) increased willingness on the part of staff members to
adjust their behaviors to meet the changing needs of
individual clients, and of client's groups.
York (1996) conducted an empirical examination of
social workers in both leadership and clinical positions in
a variety of social work agencies in two states. The
objectives of his study were (a) to determine the extent to
which social workers placed emphasis upon support and
delegation of responsibility in accordance with the
propositions of the situational model, (b) to determine
whether persons in organizational leadership positions
differed from other social workers on their level of
adherence to the propositions of this model, and (c) to
determine whether persons with higher performance ratings
differ from those with lower performance ratings on their
level of adherence to the SLT model.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
52
Responses to York's (1996) survey tend to embrace the
propositions of SLT model that are related to the
delegation of decision responsibility and to reject the
propositions related to supervisory support. Also, social
workers in both leadership and clinical positions in two
states are found to readily embrace two of the three
propositions of the Situational Leadership Model that deal
with the delegation of decision responsibility. They
embrace, to a lesser extent, the third proposition
regarding decision participation. Strongly supported is
the idea that subordinates with high task readiness should
be delegated more responsibility than those with either
moderate task maturity or low task maturity. Supported to
a lesser extent is the idea that staff with moderate task
readiness should be delegated more responsibility than
those with low task readiness. It was also found that
compliance with the propositions of this model were not
predicted by position level, supervisory performance
rating, or the receipt of an above average pay raise.
Ireh and Bailey (1999) examined the relationships
among school superintendents' leadership styles, style
adaptability, and certain characteristics of school
districts identified in the literature as contributing to
the success or failure of planned change in schools. The
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
53
relationship between leadership style adaptability and
readiness of staff for organizational change are modestly
related to district expenditure per pupil. The analyses
from the first research question show that when acting
singularly and in relationship with other predictor
variables, only district expenditure per pupil is
significantly, positively, and linearly related to
superintendents' leadership style adaptability (Ireh &
Bailey, 1999).
The analysis of results from the second research
question yielded no variables that were statistically
significant related to superintendents' tendency to use as
their predominant leadership style either the telling (SI)
or the selling (S2) leadership style. The results of a
multiple regression indicate that years of experience as an
administrator statistically, significantly contributes to
their tendency to use the participating (S3) style of
leadership. Three variables, years of experience as an
administrator, recruitment status, and type of school
district, make statistically significant contributions to
the prediction of the use the delegating (S4) style of
leadership.
A follow-up analysis was performed to see if selling
and participating superintendents differed significantly
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
54
with respect to 11 continuous and three dichotomous
variables. The results show no statistically significant
difference between selling and participating
superintendents on any of the independent variables.
Superintendents in this study use participating and selling
leadership styles in leading school employees through
change implementation.
Summary
The study of situational leadership factors has and
continues to be the focus of many academic research studies
(Abdul-Raheem, 1994). The review of the literature
demonstrates that Hersey's, Blanchard's, and
Johnson's(1988) SLT has been used extensively as a method
of training managers. However, "more research is necessary
to clarify the degree of contribution that SLT makes to the
understanding of leadership" (Blank, Weitzel, & Green 1990,
p. 589). Situational leadership opens the lines of
communication between subordinate employees and management,
causes feelings of worth (in regard to work environment) in
subordinates, and makes it possible for personal and
organizational goals to be accomplished through mutual
agreement (Blanchard, 1994).
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
55
As the work force continues into the 21st Century,
innovative measures have been taken to allow management to
become increasingly aware of the need to be effective in
managing a smarter, sharper workforce. Public and private
industries are increasingly using SLT to train managers to
effectively manage a changing workforce. Chapter III
covers the methodology used to examine th