19th Ka and 31st AIAA ICSSC Joint ConferenceFlorence, October 2013
A Digital Revisitation of
Analog Beam-Forming TechniquesPiero Angeletti¹, Marco Lisi¹¯²
1) European Space Agency, Noordwijk, The Netherlands2) Special Advisor to the European Commission
1
Summary• The development of multiple beams antennas and of
reconfigurable active arrays is tightly connected to that of Beam-Forming Networks (BFN’s);
• Several analog BFN architectures were developed in the past for radar and satellite applications;
• More recently, digital beam-forming techniques are being developed, in order to achieve higher degrees of reconfigurability and flexibility;
• Some analog BFN topologies can be easily translated into a digital realization. Moreover, by taking advantage of beams and/or elements symmetries, substantial reductions in terms of complexity and power consumption can be achieved.
19th Ka and 31st AIAA ICSSC Joint Conference, Florence, October 2013 2
19th Ka and 31st AIAA ICSSC Joint Conference, Florence, October 2013
Arrays for Space ApplicationsKey features:
• Multi-beam generation: a single aperture can contemporarily generate a multitude of beams
• Modularity/Scalability: building blocks approach (i.e. the radiating elements and its associated T/R module)
• RF Power Pooling: all High Power Amplifiers (HPAs) contribute to each beam (the overall RF power can be dynamically shared among the beams)
• Graceful Degradation: a failure of some elements will not cause the loss of the full antenna function
• Wide angle scanning• Steering/Pointing Agility
3
19th Ka and 31st AIAA ICSSC Joint Conference, Florence, October 2013
Divide/Combine Beamforming Networks
N
M
• The BFN is often the dominant component, the “true hearth” of most multiple beams antennas.
• BFN’s are complex networks used to precisely control the phase and amplitude of RF energy passing through them, which is conveyed to the radiating elements of an antenna array.
4
19th Ka and 31st AIAA ICSSC Joint Conference, Florence, October 2013
Cross-Bar Beamforming Networks • Full equivalence
with a cross-bar topology can be obtained identifying the amplitude/phase weighting and the feed accumulation as a basic cell element.
Single Beam BFN
N
M
5
RF versus IF Beam-Forming
19th Ka and 31st AIAA ICSSC Joint Conference, Florence, October 2013 6
EN
BN 1:BN
EN:1
Beams
Feeds
RF BFN IF BFN NE LNAs NE LNAs
NE RF Power Dividers NE IF Power Dividers
NE xNB RF Phase & Amplitude Controls NE xNB
IF Phase & AmplitudeControls
NB RF Power Combiners NB IF Power Combiners
NB Mixers NE Mixers
ESA Multibeam Array Model (MAM, circa 1980)
19th Ka and 31st AIAA ICSSC Joint Conference, Florence, October 2013 7
S-Band Payload of Japanese Data Relay Satellite (ETS-VI)
19th Ka and 31st AIAA ICSSC Joint Conference, Florence, October 2013 8
The T. Teshirogi Patent (1982)
19th Ka and 31st AIAA ICSSC Joint Conference, Florence, October 2013 9
Butler Matrix Beam-Forming
19th Ka and 31st AIAA ICSSC Joint Conference, Florence, October 2013 10
Nota Bene: an 8x8 Butler matrix requires 12 hybrid couplers and 8 phase shifters. A traditional “divide/combine” BFN would have required 112 hybrid couplers and 64 phase-shifters!
Butler Matrix as Analog Implementationof FFT (and viceversa)
• The complexity reduction of a Butler matrix is equivalent to that obtained, in digital signal processing, by using the Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) algorithm to evaluate the Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT).
19th Ka and 31st AIAA ICSSC Joint Conference, Florence, October 2013 11
19th Ka and 31st AIAA ICSSC Joint Conference, Florence, October 2013
AI1
AQ1
AIm
AQm
AIM
AQM
BI1BQ
1BI
nBQ
nBI
NBQ
N
Digital Beamforming• In digital
beamforming, the operations of phase shifting and amplitude scaling for each antenna element, and summation for receiving, are done digitally.
I,Q samples of the beam signals
Complex Multiplierand Adder
12
Analog vs. Digital Weight Element
19th Ka and 31st AIAA ICSSC Joint Conference, Florence, October 2013 13
19th Ka and 31st AIAA ICSSC Joint Conference, Florence, October 2013
Where does the complexity stand?• The total number of
beamforming weights (i.e. multiplications) plays a key role in defining the processing burden
• To carry out the complex weighting, four real multiplications and two real additions are be required
• Multipliers cost much more than Adders
Operation GatesComp Mul 6000Comp Add 300
IA
QA
I I Q QA E A E
I Q Q IA E A E
ASIC Gates’ count Example(10 bits of word length)
14
19th Ka and 31st AIAA ICSSC Joint Conference, Florence, October 2013
Digital Beamforming in a Processor
Design Example• DRA in Tx (2 sets of 475
radiating elements, for 2 polarizations)
• Two sets of beamformers, for the two polarizations, each one processing 64 user beams with a 250 MHz bandwidth
• Due to the 2 polarizations on user side, there are two sets of output chains (Mx + DAC).
15
RX Digital Beam-Forming Network
19th Ka and 31st AIAA ICSSC Joint Conference, Florence, October 2013 16
FFT and Butler BFN’s (1/2)
19th Ka and 31st AIAA ICSSC Joint Conference, Florence, October 2013 17
• Factorised beamforming matrices (e.g. FFT and Butler Matrices) allow to reduce the BFN complexity
A constituent Radiation Pattern is chosen as prototype beam.
Out-of-nadir Beams are generated from the constituent beam applying the phase scanning.
• The main drawback of the Butler/FFT BFN is related to the limited array geometries and beam lattices to which it can be applied.
FFT and Butler BFN’s (2/2)
19th Ka and 31st AIAA ICSSC Joint Conference, Florence, October 2013 18
• DBF techniques based on Fast-Fourier-Transforms (FFTs) on planar lattices are particularly well suited for periodic active arrays and have been recently implemented, tested and validated in a real-time proof-of-concept demonstrator
(Courtesy of Astrium)
Conclusions
19th Ka and 31st AIAA ICSSC Joint Conference, Florence, October 2013 19
Digital BFN architectures inspired to equivalent analog topologiesand exploiting beams/elements symmetries offer severaladvantages, a non exhaustive list of which includes:
• Use of a unique architecture for several array geometries.• Scalable design, able to support from few to
hundreds/thousand beams and elements.• A high degree of modularity, provided by the decomposition
of the BFN in building blocks.• High efficiency in terms of technology and reduced complexity
(i.e. number of devices, mass, area/volume, power consumption, power dissipation, integration and testing time and cost).
• The solution is applicable both to transmit and receive beamforming.