Florida APA ConferenceSeptember 9, 2011Michael Bomar, PE
Michael Bomar, PETetra Tech
FLORIDA AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION CONFERENCE
September 9, 2011
Florida APA ConferenceSeptember 9, 2011Michael Bomar, PE
IDENTIFY ISSUES FOR
EACH JURISDICTION
DEVELOP POTENTIAL
STRATEGIES
PROVIDE JLUS RECOMMENDATIONS
APPROACH
Florida APA ConferenceSeptember 9, 2011Michael Bomar, PE
Issue Description
Jurisdiction
Highlands Count
y
Avon Park
Sebring
Okeechobee Count
y
Osceola
County
Polk Count
y
Frostproof
Military Operation Areas (MOA) √ √ √ √ √ √ √
Buffer Area √ √ √ √
Low Level Flight Areas √ √ √ √
Aircraft Noise √ √ √ √
Blast Noise √ √ √ √ √ √ √
Outdoor Lighting—Night Vision Training Areas √ √ √ √
Bird / Aircraft Strike Hazards (BASH) √ √ √ √
Conservation Resources √ √ √ √
Transportation Interchanges &/or Corridors √ √ √ √ √ √ √
Public Access √ √ √ √
General Aviation and Military Aircraft Conflicts √ √ √ √ √ √ √
Florida APA ConferenceSeptember 9, 2011Michael Bomar, PE
Design & Construction Standards
Effective Disclosure Measures Lighting Standards Educational Handouts on Radio
Frequency Public Awareness Measures Implement Sound Attenuation
Construction Requirements Identify Military Operations
Areas on Public Documents Military Influence Planning Area
(MIPA) Ordinance Small Area Studies Comprehensive Plan & Land
Development Code Updates Military and Inter-
Governmental Coordination Limit Object Heights Airspace Studies Designate Specific Use
Restrictions to Maintain Compatibility
Voluntary Land or Development Rights Acquisition Program
Additional Noise Study Site Specific R/AICUZ for APAFR
Highlands CountyAvon ParkSebring
Okeechobee County
Osceola County
Polk CountyFrostproof
APAFR
PROVIDE JLUS RECOMMENDATIONS
IDENTIFY ISSUES FOR EACH
JURISDICTION
DEVELOP POTENTIAL
STRATEGIES
Types of Development Near APAFR Boundary
Military Operations Areas (MOAs)
Aircraft Noise Blast Noise Intensity &
Frequency Low Level Flight Area Outdoor Lighting-Night Vision
Goggle Training Bird / Aircraft Strike Hazard
(BASH) Conservation Resources Transportation Corridors &
Study Areas Unrestricted Public Access General Aviation & Military
Aircraft Conflicts
Florida APA ConferenceSeptember 9, 2011Michael Bomar, PE
INTEGRATED ROLES
JLUS Policy Committee
JLUS Technical Working Group
APAFR JLUS
Public
Florida APA ConferenceSeptember 9, 2011Michael Bomar, PE
Florida APA ConferenceSeptember 9, 2011Michael Bomar, PE
Florida APA ConferenceSeptember 9, 2011Michael Bomar, PE
Florida APA ConferenceSeptember 9, 2011Michael Bomar, PE
Florida APA ConferenceSeptember 9, 2011Michael Bomar, PE
APAFR F-35
=JOINT
LAND
USE
STUDY
ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT
STATEMENT
Florida APA ConferenceSeptember 9, 2011Michael Bomar, PE
Jurisdiction
Summary of Recommendations
Continue Ongoing Coordination with FAA
Identify Military Operations and High Noise Areas on Public Documents
Implement Public Awareness Measures
Implement Effective Disclosure Procedures
Implement Lighting Standards to Avoid Glare and Reflection
Evaluate Opportunities to Manage Public Access
Develop Plan For Critical Areas Supporting Military Readiness and /or Environmental Conservation
Continue and Support Ongoing APAFR Environmental Stewardship Program
Seek Funding for Updated Noise Study
Conduct Noise Study
Update JLUS Document With Results from Noise Study
Develop and Distribute BASH Educational Material
Develop Program Exploring Methods to Control Bird and Wildlife Near APAFR
Monitor Land Use at/near Transportation Corridors &/or Hubs
Formulize Policy To Implement Cross-Jurisdictional Collaboration and Coordination
Monitor Recertification of Runway and Seek Funding for the Preparation of APAFR R/AICUZ
Participate & Encourage Public to Participate in Preparation of APAFR R/AICUZ
Update Comp Plan & LDC to Strengthen Uses Compatible to APAFR Missions
Establish MIPA Overlay Districts I, II, and III
Revise Compatible Land Use Ordinance
Implement Noise Attenuation Standards for New Construction in MIPA I and II
Limit Object Heights in MIPA’s
Adopt Resolution Supporting JLUS Recommendations & Implementation
Support CFRPC Continuing As Lead Facilitator of JLUS Implementation Activities
Polk County Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö
Frostproof Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö
Osceola County Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö
Highlands County Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö
Avon Park Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö
Sebring Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö
Okeechobee County Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö
APAFR Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö
Florida APA ConferenceSeptember 9, 2011Michael Bomar, PE
RECOMMENDATIONS
ENVIRONMENTAL
NOISE
LAND USE
COORDINATION
Florida APA ConferenceSeptember 9, 2011Michael Bomar, PE
Florida APA ConferenceSeptember 9, 2011Michael Bomar, PE
Michael Bomar, PETetra Tech
FLORIDA AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION CONFERENCE
September 9, 2011
Florida APA ConferenceSeptember 9, 2011Michael Bomar, PE
RECOMMENDATIONS
Florida APA ConferenceSeptember 9, 2011Michael Bomar, PE
Florida APA ConferenceSeptember 9, 2011Michael Bomar, PE
Military Influence Planning Area
(MIPA) Designation
Geographic Vicinity
3 Mile Buffer
Contains Areas of Moderate Risk
of Blast Noise Complaints
Contains Areas of Low Risk of
Blast Noise Complaints
Low Level Flight
Training Areas
Night Vision Training
Areas
I § § § § §II § § § §III §
MIPA-I: Focused on addressing compatibility issues in a three mile buffer zone around the perimeter of the Range and those areas where a moderate risk of blast noise complaints occur. It also includes a portion of low level flight training areas and areas where night vision training is conducted. MIPA-I’s are focused on limiting density, object height, and nighttime light encroachment. The designation of MIPA-I’s are not recommended for all jurisdictions participating in this study.
MIPA-II: Identified to address compatibility issues related to blast noise, low level flight training and areas where night vision training is conducted. MIPA-II’s are focused on limiting density, object height, and nighttime light encroachment. MIPA-II designations are not recommended for all jurisdictions participating in this study.
MIPA-III: Related to Areas of low risk of blast noise complaints, the presence of civilian aircraft operations and this area’s general proximity to MIPA’s I and II. The distance beyond the Range boundary for MIPA-III’s vary but the MIPA-III areas generally exist in the low level of blast noise risk areas outside MIPA’s I and II.
MILITARY INFLUENCE PLANNING AREAS (MIPAs)