Download - 293 Norwood Road
Proposal Installation for: Solar PV 293 Norwood Road UB24JJ 13.02.2013
Quote No. Page Date
30286/PV 1 of 4 13.02.13
JNL Contractors196 Mitcham RoadTootingSW17 9NN
Dear Jas
Re 293 Norwood Road Southal UB2 4JJ
Please find below my quotation for the installation of a photovoltaic system 3.0 KW peak comprising 12Bisol BMO250 Monocrystalline Black on Black modules mounted in a roof integrated system on the southwest facing roof.
I have simulated the returns for each proposal using both the Standard Assessment Procedure laid out in themcs certification guidelines and also with the aid of dedicated specialist analytical software created by thephotovoltaic department of the University of Geneva PV Syst. I have attached the simulations and thecalculations for the financial returns.
I have summarised the results for your convenience in the table on page 3.
Please be advised that in order to qualify for the feed in tariff the property will need to demonstrate anenergy efficiency level of D or above via an energy performance certificate.
Please also re advised that a roof report by a qualified professional will need to be provided In order to verifythe load bearing capacity of the roof structure. This is a requirement of the MCS process to validate thesystem to qualify for the Feed in Tarrif. Again complete Plumbing can provide this report for our standardfee as detailed in the estimates provided.
Please also be advised that planning permission may be required for this installation. Complete Pluming hasdnot carried out planning enquiries for this installation. Should you wish us to make planning enquiries onyour behalf we shall be able to do so, charges may apply.
Please also be advised that should you wish to proceed we will ask for a 40% deposit and ask you to sign ourstandard custom agreement which we have attached for your attention.
Should you have any queries at all please do not hesitate to contact me.
Yours sincerely,
Nick Cotton
QUOTATION
JNL Contractors196 Mitcham RoadTootingSW17 9NN
ITEM DETAIL COST £
Item 1To supply and install 12 Bisol BMO 250 monocrystalline solarPV modules to be m ounted in a roof integrated system creating aweather proof solar roof
Panels to be mounted on one south west facing roof
String Inverter Samil Solariver 2.3 TL(10 Year Warranty)Elster generation meter Ac and Dc isolators.
To allow for the supply of all works to mount and fix solar pvmodules ac and dc isolators inverter and make connection toexisting consumer unit.
We have not allowed for the provision of high level accessincluding the fabrication of a scaffold for the duration of theworks
To allow for all commissioning electrical installation certificationand provision of MCS certification to allow access to feed intariffs.
£6230 + vat
Labour, parts, materials
+VAT @ 5%
TOTAL
Quote No. Page Date
30286/PV 2 of 4 13.02.13
Energy prices have risen on average 8% a year for the last 5 years. Taking this into account your new systemwill pay for itself In between 8.6 and 8.9 years.
Quote No. Page Date
30286/PV 3 of 4 13.02.13
Size of System No of Panels Calculator Annual predictedoutput
PV Tarrif rate Net financial Gain /Pay Back period
3.0 kwp /South Westfacing
Bisol BMO 250 roofintegrated
12 SAP 2464.8 kwh 0.1544 £596.24/10.44yrs
3.0 kwp /South Westfacing
Bisol BMO 250 roofintegrated
12 PV syst 2 567kwh0.1544
£620.96/10.03 yrs
Kwh stands for kilowatt hours which is the unit electricity usage is measured in. The Feed in tariff pays 15.44p at current levels for each unitgenerated by the system plus 4.5p for half the total generated which is assumed will be fed back to the grid. In addition it is assumed that
half the total will be used in the property and so will yield returns from using your own electricity rather than buying electricity at 13p a unitfrom your electricity supplier.
The performance of solar PV systems is impossible to predict with certainty due to the variabilityin the amount of solar radiation (sunlight) from location to location and from year to year. Thisestimate is based upon the Government's standard assessment procedure for energy rating ofbuildings (SAP) and is given as guidance only. It should not be considered as a guarantee ofperformance."
JNL Contractors196 Mitcham RoadTootingSW17 9NN
1813,60
6786
6786
11647
3300
Norwood2WEIGHT:
A3
SHEET 1 OF 1SCALE:1:100
DWG NO.
TITLE:
REVISIONDO NOT SCALE DRAWING
MATERIAL:
DATESIGNATURENAME
DEBUR AND BREAK SHARP EDGES
FINISH:UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED:DIMENSIONS ARE IN MILLIMETERSSURFACE FINISH:TOLERANCES: LINEAR: ANGULAR:
Q.A
MFG
APPV'D
CHK'D
DRAWN
PV Incentive Comparison Calculator
3.18 kw South West Facing
293 Norwood Road
Renewable Technology Photvoltaic
output rating 3
deemed output kw hours per year 2464.8
rate of tarrif or incentive 0.1544
lifetime of tarrif 20
value of genration tarrif per year (15.44p per kw generated) 380.56512
value of export tarrif (50% of total generated x 4.5p) 55.458
units saved per year ( 50% of total generated) 1232.4
unit cost of input fuel 0.13
value of saving at fuel cost 12p electric 4p gas 160.212
gain per watt output 0.2419
Total financial gain from technology per year 596.23512
Cost of supply and installation
life time of tarrif 20
cost per year 0
cost per watt output 0
gain per watt output 0.2419
nett gain 0.2419
nett gain one year £596.24
nett gain life time of tarrif £11,924.70
Tarriffs are set to deliver an approximate rate of return of 5-8% for well sited installations
As the tarrifs are linked to inflation in nominal terms the rate of return could therefore be
considered to be approximatly 7-10%
In the 2009 pre budget report the chancellor confirmed that households who use renewable technology
to generate electricity mainly for own use will not be subject to income tax on feed in tarrifs.
Department of Energy and Climate Change
February 2010
The performance of solar PV systems is impossible to predict with certainty due to the variability
in the amount of solar radiation (sunlight) from location to location and from year to year. This
estimate is based upon the Government's standard assessment procedure for energy rating of
buildings (SAP) and is given as guidance only. It should not be considered as a guarantee of
performance."
PV Incentive Comparison Calculator
3.18 kw South West Facing
293 Norwood Road
SAP Calculation Appendix M
Electricity Produced by PV Modules = 0.8xkwpxSxZpv
S Annual solar irradiation from Table H2
Zpv Overshading Factor from Table H3
Table H2
Orientation of collector
Horizontal South SE/SW E/W NE/NW North
30 deg 1073 1027 913 785 730
45 deg 1054 997 854 686 640
60 deg 989 927 776 597 500
vertical 746 705 582 440 371
Overshading Factor
Overshading percent of sky blocked by obstacles Overshading Factor
Heavy greater 80% 0.5
Significant 60-80% 0.65
Modest 20-60% 0.8
None or very little less than 20% 1.0
SAP Calculation 0.8*kwp*S*Zs
KWP of array 3
Department of Energy and Climate Change S solar irradiation 1027
Shading factor 1
Annual SAP estimated output 2464.8
The performance of solar PV systems is impossible to predict with certainty due to the variability
in the amount of solar radiation (sunlight) from location to location and from year to year. This
estimate is based upon the Government's standard assessment procedure for energy rating of
buildings (SAP) and is given as guidance only. It should not be considered as a guarantee of
performance."
Page 1/310/02/13PVSYST V5.53
293 Norwood Road3kwp south west faicng no shading Bisol BMO 250 Solarriver 3000TL 2567kwh
Grid-Connected System: Simulation parameters
Project : 293 NorwoodRoad
Geographical Site London Country United Kingdom
Situation Latitude 51.4°N Longitude 0.0°ETime defined as Legal Time Time zone UT+0 Altitude 5 m
Albedo 0.20
Meteo data : London, Synthetic Hourly data
Simulation variant : 3kwp south west faicng no shading Bisol BMO 250 Solarriver 3000TL 2567kwh
Simulation date 10/02/13 10h21
Simulation parameters
Collector Plane Orientation Tilt 15° Azimuth 0°
Horizon Free Horizon
Near Shadings No Shadings
PV Array Characteristics
PV module Si-mono Model BMO-250Manufacturer Bisol d.o.o.
Number of PV modules In series 12 modules In parallel 1 stringsTotal number of PV modules Nb. modules 12 Unit Nom. Power 250 WpArray global power Nominal (STC) 3000 Wp At operating cond. 2746 Wp (50°C)Array operating characteristics (50°C) U mpp 341 V I mpp 8.0 ATotal area Module area 19.6 m² Cell area 17.5 m²
Inverter Model SolarRiver 3000TLManufacturer Samil Power Co., Ltd.
Characteristics Operating Voltage 210-500 V Unit Nom. Power 2.60 kW AC
PV Array loss factorsThermal Loss factor Uc (const) 20.0 W/m²K Uv (wind) 0.0 W/m²K / m/s
=> Nominal Oper. Coll. Temp. (G=800 W/m², Tamb=20°C, Wind=1 m/s.) NOCT 56 °C
Wiring Ohmic Loss Global array res. 681 mOhm Loss Fraction 1.5 % at STCModule Quality Loss Loss Fraction 0.1 %Module Mismatch Losses Loss Fraction 2.0 % at MPPIncidence effect, ASHRAE parametrization IAM = 1 - bo (1/cos i - 1) bo Parameter 0.05
User's needs : Unlimited load (grid)
Page 2/310/02/13PVSYST V5.53
293 Norwood Road3kwp south west faicng no shading Bisol BMO 250 Solarriver 3000TL 2567kwh
Grid-Connected System: Main results
Project : 293 NorwoodRoad
Simulation variant : 3kwp south west faicng no shading Bisol BMO 250 Solarriver 3000TL 2567kwh
Main system parameters System type Grid-ConnectedPV Field Orientation tilt 15° azimuth 0°PV modules Model BMO-250 Pnom 250 WpPV Array Nb. of modules 12 Pnom total 3000 WpInverter Model SolarRiver 3000TL Pnom 2600 W acUser's needs Unlimited load (grid)
Main simulation resultsSystem Production Produced Energy 2567 kWh/year Specific prod. 856 kWh/kWp/year
Performance Ratio PR 82.5 %
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Norm
aliz
ed
Energ
y[k
Wh/k
Wp/d
ay]
Normalized productions (per installed kWp): Nominal power 3000 Wp
Yf : Produced useful energy (inverter output) 2.34 kWh/kWp/dayLs : System Loss (inverter, ...) 0.1 kWh/kWp/dayLc : Collection Loss (PV-array losses) 0.39 kWh/kWp/day
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Perf
orm
ance
Ratio
PR
Performance Ratio PR
PR : Performance Ratio (Yf / Yr) : 0.825
3kwp south west faicng no shading Bisol BMO 250 Solarriver 3000TL 2567kwh
Balances and main results
GlobHor T Amb GlobInc GlobEff EArray E_Grid EffArrR EffSysR
kWh/m² °C kWh/m² kWh/m² kWh kWh % %
January 20.0 5.70 25.6 24.3 65.7 60.8 13.07 12.10
February 34.0 5.50 40.9 39.0 107.4 101.5 13.39 12.66
March 70.0 6.80 80.3 76.9 212.3 203.2 13.48 12.91
April 103.0 8.30 110.7 106.6 292.1 280.7 13.45 12.92
May 138.0 11.50 142.2 137.0 370.7 356.3 13.30 12.78
June 146.0 14.70 148.0 142.8 382.1 367.1 13.17 12.65
July 142.0 17.10 144.7 139.6 368.9 354.7 13.00 12.50
August 124.0 17.10 130.8 125.9 333.1 320.0 12.99 12.48
September 88.0 15.20 98.9 94.9 254.1 244.0 13.10 12.58
October 52.0 11.60 62.5 59.8 162.2 154.8 13.23 12.63
November 26.0 8.20 33.8 32.1 86.3 81.1 13.02 12.24
December 15.0 6.90 19.2 18.2 47.2 43.1 12.57 11.48
Year 958.0 10.75 1037.6 997.1 2682.3 2567.4 13.18 12.62
Legends: GlobHor Horizontal global irradiation
T Amb Ambient Temperature
GlobInc Global incident in coll. plane
GlobEff Effective Global, corr. for IAM and shadings
EArray Effective energy at the output of the array
E_Grid Energy injected into grid
EffArrR Effic. Eout array / rough area
EffSysR Effic. Eout system / rough area
Page 3/310/02/13PVSYST V5.53
293 Norwood Road3kwp south west faicng no shading Bisol BMO 250 Solarriver 3000TL 2567kwh
Grid-Connected System: Loss diagram
Project : 293 NorwoodRoad
Simulation variant : 3kwp south west faicng no shading Bisol BMO 250 Solarriver 3000TL 2567kwh
Main system parameters System type Grid-ConnectedPV Field Orientation tilt 15° azimuth 0°PV modules Model BMO-250 Pnom 250 WpPV Array Nb. of modules 12 Pnom total 3000 WpInverter Model SolarRiver 3000TL Pnom 2600 W acUser's needs Unlimited load (grid)
Loss diagram over the whole year
Horizontal global irradiation958 kWh/m²
+8.3% Global incident in coll. plane
-3.9% IAM factor on global
Effective irradiance on collectors997 kWh/m² * 20 m² coll.
efficiency at STC = 15.31% PV conversion
Array nominal energy (at STC effic.)2995 kWh
-5.5% PV loss due to irradiance level
-2.3% PV loss due to temperature
-0.1% Module quality loss
-2.1% Module array mismatch loss
-0.7% Ohmic wiring loss
Array virtual energy at MPP2688 kWh
-4.3% Inverter Loss during operation (efficiency)
0.0% Inverter Loss over nominal inv. power
-0.2% Inverter Loss due to power threshold
0.0% Inverter Loss over nominal inv. voltage
0.0% Inverter Loss due to voltage threshold
Available Energy at Inverter Output2567 kWh
Energy injected into grid2567 kWh
Comments by previous customers
An excellent service and an excellent product. Professional and objective advice from the start to thecompletion of our engagement plus an on-going support when required.Physical works carried out quickly clearly and safely. Solar panels are technically great and look marvellousdue to the advice I received the maximum amount of ‘from solar panelI’d thoroughly recommend this company and would have them back to work for me again without a secondthought.Huge apologies for the delay! Our panels are great
Roan Willmore BSc (hons) Environmental ScienceEnvironmental and Sustainability ManagerSE19
Thanks for helping out where others couldn’t. It’s a relief to find someone who understands the complexity ofmodern home energy systems and is able and willing to work out best solution for every site.Will AndersonSW2
Installation was completed very helpful and efficient within a couple of days, and my solar panels were up andrunning straight away. Thank you. Your service is brilliantCharmian KennerSW2
Complete Plumbing and Heating Service Ltd played a major part as a sub-contractor. Their standard of workwas very good and included the installation of the Solar and Photo Voltaic panels with related pipework andequipment as well as the more general plumbing work.
The project was completed very satisfactorily within budget and with the submission of a reference manuallisting the work done. On completion the Company provided a briefing explaining the system and the controlmethodology. We were very pleased with the quality work and helpfulness of all involved.
Peter CobleySW4
We asked three companies to provide us with an estimate to install PV panels, CPHS was not only the mostthorough of the three in terms of survey they undertook but they also came up with the most cost effectiveproposal. The installation went pretty smoothly and the system works well.
Richard SeagerManagement ConsultantSE22
Very Happy. Job done professionally. Very high standard of workmanship. Cooperative team of installers.
Found them highly experienced in the field of solar and underfloor heating. I would highly recommend this
company without any doubt. Pleasure to do business with Nick Cotton.
Milan Shah
HA2