I. Title of the CaseMired in Corruption: Kellogg, Brown and Root in NigeriaII. Time ContextYear 2004-2005III. ViewpointHalliburton Top Management IV. Statement of the ProblemHow Halliburton can resolved the corruption issue in Kellogg; a company Halliburton acquired and combined with an existing Halliburton company and renamed Kellogg, Brown and Root?V. ObjectivesTo distant Halliburton from several scandals that had engulf KBRTo be able to identify the root cause of the corruption of KBR

VI. Areas of ConsiderationStrengthWeaknessOpportunitiesThreats

One of the worlds largest general contractors for construction projects in distant the worldHalliburton acquired a company that involves in different corruption systemContract to Nigerian Government to build two Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) plantsOther construction firms can acquire the contract to build the Liquefied Natural Gas plant in Nigerian GovernmentBy 1995, the Nigerias oil minister had a falling out with the countries military dictator, and was replace by Dan Etete. Etete was far less accommodating to the KB consortium, and suddenly the entire deal looked to be in jeopardy

VII. Alternative Course of Action

ACA 1 Identify the people involved in the corruption inside KBR put in into public and give justice to the issueA. Advantages The company can take an action of the issue and bestow corrective act to the people involved in the scandal Clear KBR name and status about the issue

B. Disadvantages Halliburton reputation will suffer due to the information it will released to the public in lieu to the corruption inside KBR Clients may back out because of the issue it involved