IFHP Urban Planning and Design Summer SchoolJyväskylä, Finland 15.8.2011
Antti Poikola (HUB Jyväskylä)[email protected]
Co-creation in urban planning and designCase: , Jyväskylä
Antti PoikolaHUB JyväskyläNetwork facilitator
IFHP Urban Planning and Design Summer SchoolJyväskylä, Finland 15.8.2011
Antti Poikola (HUB Jyväskylä)[email protected]
Co-creation in urban planning
Who: Planners perspective (Other perspectives: politicians, civil cervants, citizens, businesses and other organizations...)
What: Open planning process which involves different stakeholders
Why: Democracy – quality of planning – less complains
How: Few words on methods and general process of participation
When: Earlier, earlier, earlier
Case: Results and methods from the participative urban planning project at Kangas, Jyväskylä, Finland
Open discussion
IFHP Urban Planning and Design Summer SchoolJyväskylä, Finland 15.8.2011
Antti Poikola (HUB Jyväskylä)[email protected]
Who?
- Different people with different roles (politicians, civil cervants, citizens, businesses and other organizations)
- Who is invited to participate and who may participate even if not invited? Open vs. Closed participation
- Behind the roles, participants are all people
- Who has the responsability of participation in urban planning?
- How many participants is enough?
IFHP Urban Planning and Design Summer SchoolJyväskylä, Finland 15.8.2011
Antti Poikola (HUB Jyväskylä)[email protected]
Who?
IFHP Urban Planning and Design Summer SchoolJyväskylä, Finland 15.8.2011
Antti Poikola (HUB Jyväskylä)[email protected]
Image: jurek_durczak (Flickr)
What? - Open and smart city
- How to get the citizens / companies / communities, politicians and civil cervants to collaborate?
- Urban planning as a open process, which involves different stakeholders
- Planning is not same as zoning
- In city development there
are many processes where
collaboration could be usefull
IFHP Urban Planning and Design Summer SchoolJyväskylä, Finland 15.8.2011
Antti Poikola (HUB Jyväskylä)[email protected]
What? - Open and smart city
Image: jurek_durczak (Flickr)
Transparency
Participation
Collaboration
IFHP Urban Planning and Design Summer SchoolJyväskylä, Finland 15.8.2011
Antti Poikola (HUB Jyväskylä)[email protected]
Ideas
© Toni laturi
Transparent City
Elaboration
ImplementationDATA
DATA
DATA
City organizationCivili Society & Companies
IFHP Urban Planning and Design Summer SchoolJyväskylä, Finland 15.8.2011
Antti Poikola (HUB Jyväskylä)[email protected]
Ideas
© Toni laturi
City enabling participation
Planning
ImplementationDATA
DATA
DATA
IFHP Urban Planning and Design Summer SchoolJyväskylä, Finland 15.8.2011
Antti Poikola (HUB Jyväskylä)[email protected]
Ideas
© Toni laturi
Collaborative City
Planning
ImplementationDATA
DATA
DATA
IFHP Urban Planning and Design Summer SchoolJyväskylä, Finland 15.8.2011
Antti Poikola (HUB Jyväskylä)[email protected]
Why?
- Ideal: Open processes enable functional democracy
- Practical approach: Quality of processes get better when more people get involved.
- Monetary motivation: Open process lead to less complains → time and money is saved
- Extra: Some work load can be diveded to the people interested in participation
IFHP Urban Planning and Design Summer SchoolJyväskylä, Finland 15.8.2011
Antti Poikola (HUB Jyväskylä)[email protected]
How? Process view
- Collaboration needs resources and official role in the planning process.
- Challenge is fitting the used methods to the regular planning process
- Can collaboration be outsourced?
IFHP Urban Planning and Design Summer SchoolJyväskylä, Finland 15.8.2011
Antti Poikola (HUB Jyväskylä)[email protected]
Workshops14 facilitated events
Self organized groups
10 visions
Individualsn. 10 visions
Wiki -planning
DigitalStorytelling
NewspapersRadio
Web-site15 000 visitors
TV
LIGHTPARTICIPATION
Kangas arond the clock56 stories
Online forum63 ideas, 166
comments402 registered usersDay at
Kangas40 stories and a
summarizing video
31 VISIONSmore than 353 people
participated in creating these PUBLICITY
How? - Case: Kangas Jyväskylä
More than active 600 participants during two months
IFHP Urban Planning and Design Summer SchoolJyväskylä, Finland 15.8.2011
Antti Poikola (HUB Jyväskylä)[email protected]
How? Methods from Kangas case
- Some methods: Wiki planning, Digital Storytelling, Online forums
Wiki -planning method (Peter Tattersall) 15.3 ja 24.2011
IFHP Urban Planning and Design Summer SchoolJyväskylä, Finland 15.8.2011
Antti Poikola (HUB Jyväskylä)[email protected]
When?
”Jyväskylä listens to the citizens before the architects”
Helsingin Sanomat March 11th 2011
IFHP Urban Planning and Design Summer SchoolJyväskylä, Finland 15.8.2011
Antti Poikola (HUB Jyväskylä)[email protected]
When? Earlier you get more than expected
- Feedback from a outdoor expert - How to build good ”Pitkospuut”?
- Useless detail for a urban planner, but usefull for the one who orders the pitkospuut to the natural parks
IFHP Urban Planning and Design Summer SchoolJyväskylä, Finland 15.8.2011
Antti Poikola (HUB Jyväskylä)[email protected]
• Diversity
• Community and encounters between people
• Incentives for activity and nature
• Mobility
• Lively, active, city of people
Case Kangas: Overall results
IFHP Urban Planning and Design Summer SchoolJyväskylä, Finland 15.8.2011
Antti Poikola (HUB Jyväskylä)[email protected]
VisionsIhana aineisto!
Kaupungin uusi keskus
”Nykyinen keskusta saisi ajan saatossa muokkautua puolestamme vanhaksi kaupungiksi painopisteen siirtyessä lähemmäksi Kangasta.”
Kestävän liikenteen kaupunginosa
”Tilapäinen huoltoliikenne liikkuisi sekaliikennekatuja, jotka pääasiassa olisivat kävely- ja pyöräilykäytössä. Kaikki autopysäköinti olisi järjestetty parkkihallissa alueen laidalla.”
IFHP Urban Planning and Design Summer SchoolJyväskylä, Finland 15.8.2011
Antti Poikola (HUB Jyväskylä)[email protected]
Wiki planning: dream housing blocks
IFHP Urban Planning and Design Summer SchoolJyväskylä, Finland 15.8.2011
Antti Poikola (HUB Jyväskylä)[email protected]
Visualized story (Anne Kalliomäki, Tiina Hoskari and Lasse Saari)
Open story
IFHP Urban Planning and Design Summer SchoolJyväskylä, Finland 15.8.2011
Antti Poikola (HUB Jyväskylä)[email protected]
Online idea forum (Uservoice)
IFHP Urban Planning and Design Summer SchoolJyväskylä, Finland 15.8.2011
Antti Poikola (HUB Jyväskylä)[email protected]
Examples fron the online forum
Harjoitusjäähalli juniorikäyttöön
"Keinojäiden sijoittaminen kankaan alueelle olisi nopein ja edullisin vaihtoehto jääurheilun olosuhteiden parantamiseksi."
Tourujoki pitäisi ehdottomasti päästää vapaaksi!
"Upea koskimaisema keskellä kaupunkia - sellaista ei moneen paikkaan ole mahdollista saada, muttä Kankaalle on!”
Materiaaleina punatiili sekä puu
”Puutalokaupunki alkoi ennen Tourujoen takaa, kunnes se purettiin. Nyt toivoisi Puun palaavan uudessa muodossa rakennuksiin ja uusina innovaatioina Kankaan alueelle.”
IFHP Urban Planning and Design Summer SchoolJyväskylä, Finland 15.8.2011
Antti Poikola (HUB Jyväskylä)[email protected]
Digital storiesDigital Story Telling -workshops (Hanna Mehtonen-Rinne) 4-6.4.2011
IFHP Urban Planning and Design Summer SchoolJyväskylä, Finland 15.8.2011
Antti Poikola (HUB Jyväskylä)[email protected]
Open discussion!
IFHP Urban Planning and Design Summer SchoolJyväskylä, Finland 15.8.2011
Antti Poikola (HUB Jyväskylä)[email protected]
Thanks:
Kangas team: Laura Browne, Antti Poikola ja Asta Ruodemäki (HUn Jyväskylä)
Support group: Lasse Saari (HUB Jyväskylä), Johanna Hytönen ja Ville Keränen (Monkey Business), Esa Toivonen (Pengon), Katriina Lahtinen (Jyväskylän yliopisto), J-P Nousiainen (Aivoteollinen toimisto)
Facilitators and experts: Peter Tattersall (Aalto yliopisto), Hanna Mehtonen-Rinne (Otavan Opisto), Tiina Hoskari (Kuvitellen), Anne Kalliomäki (Tarinakone), Karoliina Jarenko (Aalto yliopisto), Johanna Kerovuori ja Tanja Korvenmaa (Cohousing Suomi)
Jyväskylä city people: Anne Sandelin ja Pirjo Heinänen (Kaupunkirakennepalvelut), Laura Ahonen ja Tuija Hämäläinen (CLIQ -hanke), Mikael Ratschinskij (Verkkotuotanto), Pertti Kuustonen ja Ulla-Maija Valtonen (JYKES Kiinteistöt Oy)
The leaders and participants of all self organized gropus and all the individuals who contributed with visions and commentaries.
The participative planning project was made possibel by: