Transcript
Page 1: 09 Chris Liptak AAPM15 Penn Ohio talk finalchapter.aapm.org/pennohio/2016/FR09 Chris_Liptak_AAPM15_Penn_… · Background 2 Bushberg2011 • Compensatesfor&the&attenuation& difference&between&center&and&

Validation  of  a  Method  for  Characterizing  Scanner-­Specific  Bowtie  Filters  in  CT

Chris  Liptak,  Ashraf  Morgan,Frank  Dong,  Andrew  Primak,  Xiang  Li

Cleveland State UniversityCleveland Clinic

Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc.

Medical  Physics  Graduate  ProgramCleveland  State  University

&  Cleveland  Clinic

Page 2: 09 Chris Liptak AAPM15 Penn Ohio talk finalchapter.aapm.org/pennohio/2016/FR09 Chris_Liptak_AAPM15_Penn_… · Background 2 Bushberg2011 • Compensatesfor&the&attenuation& difference&between&center&and&

Background

2Bushberg 2011

• Compensates  for  the  attenuation  difference  between  center  and  periphery

• Provides  a  more  uniform  x-­ray  fluence  at  the  detector

• Reduces  peripheral  dose  without  loss  of  image  quality

(beam-­shaping  filter)bowtie  filter

Page 3: 09 Chris Liptak AAPM15 Penn Ohio talk finalchapter.aapm.org/pennohio/2016/FR09 Chris_Liptak_AAPM15_Penn_… · Background 2 Bushberg2011 • Compensatesfor&the&attenuation& difference&between&center&and&

Motivation

3

• Monte  Carlo  simulation  is  the  most  frequently  used  technique  for  patient  dose  assessment  in  CT  

• In  Monte  Carlo  simulations,  accurate  knowledge  of  a  CT  system’s  bowtie  filtration  is  essential

• Information  about  bowtie  filtration  is  often  proprietary

• Alternative:  Dose  measurements  can  be  used  to  create  a  bowtie   filter  model

Page 4: 09 Chris Liptak AAPM15 Penn Ohio talk finalchapter.aapm.org/pennohio/2016/FR09 Chris_Liptak_AAPM15_Penn_… · Background 2 Bushberg2011 • Compensatesfor&the&attenuation& difference&between&center&and&

Traditional Method: Step-and-Shoot

4Turner et al., Med. Phys. 36, no. 6 2154-2164 (2009)

θ

integrating dosimeter

probe

bowtie filter

stationary x-ray source

Page 5: 09 Chris Liptak AAPM15 Penn Ohio talk finalchapter.aapm.org/pennohio/2016/FR09 Chris_Liptak_AAPM15_Penn_… · Background 2 Bushberg2011 • Compensatesfor&the&attenuation& difference&between&center&and&

Advantages:• Single  acquisition• No  probe  repositioning

Characterization  of  bowtie  relative  attenuation  (COBRA)Boone., Med. Phys. 37, 40-48 (2010)

Recent Development

http://www.radcal.com/accu-­‐gold-­‐detail

real-­time  dosimeter

5

Page 6: 09 Chris Liptak AAPM15 Penn Ohio talk finalchapter.aapm.org/pennohio/2016/FR09 Chris_Liptak_AAPM15_Penn_… · Background 2 Bushberg2011 • Compensatesfor&the&attenuation& difference&between&center&and&

Purpose

To  perform  a  validation  of  the  COBRA  method   in  terms  of  the  accuracy  of  the  simulated dose  in  circular  and  elliptical  phantoms

6

www.ptw.de

Page 7: 09 Chris Liptak AAPM15 Penn Ohio talk finalchapter.aapm.org/pennohio/2016/FR09 Chris_Liptak_AAPM15_Penn_… · Background 2 Bushberg2011 • Compensatesfor&the&attenuation& difference&between&center&and&

Methods

Page 8: 09 Chris Liptak AAPM15 Penn Ohio talk finalchapter.aapm.org/pennohio/2016/FR09 Chris_Liptak_AAPM15_Penn_… · Background 2 Bushberg2011 • Compensatesfor&the&attenuation& difference&between&center&and&

Simulation of Real-Time Dose Signal

8

SOMATOM  Definition  Flash  (Siemens  Healthcare)  

Tian et al., Radiology 270, 535-547 (2014)Li et al., Phys. Med. Biol. 59, 4525-4548 (2014)

• PENELOPE Monte Carlo program

• The program was extended to output dose as a function of time

Page 9: 09 Chris Liptak AAPM15 Penn Ohio talk finalchapter.aapm.org/pennohio/2016/FR09 Chris_Liptak_AAPM15_Penn_… · Background 2 Bushberg2011 • Compensatesfor&the&attenuation& difference&between&center&and&

Simulated Experimental Setup

9

CTDI100 pencil ion chamber, capable of collecting real-time dose signals

Liptak et al., Med. Phys. 42, no. 6, 3747-3747 (2015)

θ

rotatingx-ray source

real-time dosimeter

probe

Page 10: 09 Chris Liptak AAPM15 Penn Ohio talk finalchapter.aapm.org/pennohio/2016/FR09 Chris_Liptak_AAPM15_Penn_… · Background 2 Bushberg2011 • Compensatesfor&the&attenuation& difference&between&center&and&

Simulation of Real-Time Dose Signal

10

Simulation  parameters:• axial  scans

• 70,  80,  100,  120,  140  kVp

• 38.4  mm  collimation

• 1-­kHz  acquisition  rate

Relative  bowtie  attenuation  profiles  were  extracted  from  simulated  dose  waveforms

Page 11: 09 Chris Liptak AAPM15 Penn Ohio talk finalchapter.aapm.org/pennohio/2016/FR09 Chris_Liptak_AAPM15_Penn_… · Background 2 Bushberg2011 • Compensatesfor&the&attenuation& difference&between&center&and&

Relative Bowtie Attenuation

11

Relative  transmitted  dose  as  a  function  of  the  fan  beam  angle

Page 12: 09 Chris Liptak AAPM15 Penn Ohio talk finalchapter.aapm.org/pennohio/2016/FR09 Chris_Liptak_AAPM15_Penn_… · Background 2 Bushberg2011 • Compensatesfor&the&attenuation& difference&between&center&and&

Basis Decomposition

12

2 2[ ( ) ( , )]n

i

V

VV V

F Vχ θ θ=

= −Γ∑

,( ) ( ) exp( ( ))( , )

( ) ( )

ii i E Al

i i

k E E tV

k E E

µ θθ

Ψ −Γ =

Ψ

experimental  bowtie  attenuation

theoreticalbowtie  attenuation

simulated  

Page 13: 09 Chris Liptak AAPM15 Penn Ohio talk finalchapter.aapm.org/pennohio/2016/FR09 Chris_Liptak_AAPM15_Penn_… · Background 2 Bushberg2011 • Compensatesfor&the&attenuation& difference&between&center&and&

Basis Decomposition

12

2 2[ ( ) ( , )]n

i

V

VV V

F Vχ θ θ=

= −Γ∑

,( ) ( ) exp( ( ))( , )

( ) ( )

ii i E Al

i i

k E E tV

k E E

µ θθ

Ψ −Γ =

Ψ

material  thickness

Page 14: 09 Chris Liptak AAPM15 Penn Ohio talk finalchapter.aapm.org/pennohio/2016/FR09 Chris_Liptak_AAPM15_Penn_… · Background 2 Bushberg2011 • Compensatesfor&the&attenuation& difference&between&center&and&

Basis Decomposition

12

2 2[ ( ) ( , )]n

i

V

VV V

F Vχ θ θ=

= −Γ∑

,( ) ( ) exp( ( ))( , )

( ) ( )

ii i E Al

i i

k E E tV

k E E

µ θθ

Ψ −Γ =

Ψ

attenuation  coefficient  of  aluminum

Page 15: 09 Chris Liptak AAPM15 Penn Ohio talk finalchapter.aapm.org/pennohio/2016/FR09 Chris_Liptak_AAPM15_Penn_… · Background 2 Bushberg2011 • Compensatesfor&the&attenuation& difference&between&center&and&

Basis Decomposition

12

2 2[ ( ) ( , )]n

i

V

VV V

F Vχ θ θ=

= −Γ∑

,( ) ( ) exp( ( ))( , )

( ) ( )

ii i E Al

i i

k E E tV

k E E

µ θθ

Ψ −Γ =

Ψ

photon  energy  fluence(from  manufacturer)

Page 16: 09 Chris Liptak AAPM15 Penn Ohio talk finalchapter.aapm.org/pennohio/2016/FR09 Chris_Liptak_AAPM15_Penn_… · Background 2 Bushberg2011 • Compensatesfor&the&attenuation& difference&between&center&and&

Basis Decomposition

12

2 2[ ( ) ( , )]n

i

V

VV V

F Vχ θ θ=

= −Γ∑

,( ) ( ) exp( ( ))( , )

( ) ( )

ii i E Al

i i

k E E tV

k E E

µ θθ

Ψ −Γ =

Ψ

mass  energy  absorption  coefficient  of  air

Page 17: 09 Chris Liptak AAPM15 Penn Ohio talk finalchapter.aapm.org/pennohio/2016/FR09 Chris_Liptak_AAPM15_Penn_… · Background 2 Bushberg2011 • Compensatesfor&the&attenuation& difference&between&center&and&

Equivalent Bowtie Model

13

aluminum

Page 18: 09 Chris Liptak AAPM15 Penn Ohio talk finalchapter.aapm.org/pennohio/2016/FR09 Chris_Liptak_AAPM15_Penn_… · Background 2 Bushberg2011 • Compensatesfor&the&attenuation& difference&between&center&and&

14

Equivalent Bowtie Filter

ActualBowtie Filter

Compared in terms of simulated phantom dose

Validation of Equivalent Bowtie Model

aluminumgraphite

aluminum

Page 19: 09 Chris Liptak AAPM15 Penn Ohio talk finalchapter.aapm.org/pennohio/2016/FR09 Chris_Liptak_AAPM15_Penn_… · Background 2 Bushberg2011 • Compensatesfor&the&attenuation& difference&between&center&and&

Validation: Phantom Dose Simulation

15

32-­cm  CTDI  phantomcustom-­designed  elliptical  phantom

Simulation  parameters:  single  axial  scans  at  70 and  120  kVp

Page 20: 09 Chris Liptak AAPM15 Penn Ohio talk finalchapter.aapm.org/pennohio/2016/FR09 Chris_Liptak_AAPM15_Penn_… · Background 2 Bushberg2011 • Compensatesfor&the&attenuation& difference&between&center&and&

Results

Page 21: 09 Chris Liptak AAPM15 Penn Ohio talk finalchapter.aapm.org/pennohio/2016/FR09 Chris_Liptak_AAPM15_Penn_… · Background 2 Bushberg2011 • Compensatesfor&the&attenuation& difference&between&center&and&

Phantom Dose at 70 kVp

17

Lateral  holes

Page 22: 09 Chris Liptak AAPM15 Penn Ohio talk finalchapter.aapm.org/pennohio/2016/FR09 Chris_Liptak_AAPM15_Penn_… · Background 2 Bushberg2011 • Compensatesfor&the&attenuation& difference&between&center&and&

Phantom Dose at 120 kVp

18

Page 23: 09 Chris Liptak AAPM15 Penn Ohio talk finalchapter.aapm.org/pennohio/2016/FR09 Chris_Liptak_AAPM15_Penn_… · Background 2 Bushberg2011 • Compensatesfor&the&attenuation& difference&between&center&and&

Conclusion

• First  attempt  to  validate  the  COBRA  method  in  terms  of  the  accuracy  of  the  simulated  phantom  dose

• The  equivalent  bowtie  filter  model  obtained  using  the  COBRA  method  compares  well  with  the  actual  bowtie  filter  in  terms  of  simulated  dose  in  acrylic  phantoms

19

Page 24: 09 Chris Liptak AAPM15 Penn Ohio talk finalchapter.aapm.org/pennohio/2016/FR09 Chris_Liptak_AAPM15_Penn_… · Background 2 Bushberg2011 • Compensatesfor&the&attenuation& difference&between&center&and&

Thank you


Top Related