بسم الله بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم الرحمن الرحيم
Population Covered by DonorPopulation Covered by Donor
USAID 34%ADB 1%
Uncovered23%
Others2%
EC 18%
WB 22%
Action Plan forAction Plan for Evaluation and Evaluation and
Implementation of Implementation of Curriculum Development Curriculum Development
in KMUin KMU
Evaluation of Practical work in Evaluation of Practical work in Biochemistry DepartmentBiochemistry Department
By :By :
Assistant Prof. Wasima SharifiAssistant Prof. Wasima Sharifi
Department of Bio-Chemistry, KMUDepartment of Bio-Chemistry, KMU
December 2006December 2006
BackgroundBackground
Paraclinic subjects are taught in PCB, Paraclinic subjects are taught in PCB, 11stst and 2 and 2ndnd class completely , and class completely , and beside that some subjects in grade beside that some subjects in grade 33rdrd, 4, 4thth, and 5, and 5thth are also included. are also included.
Practical work is an important part of Practical work is an important part of teaching method in Paraclinic (40%)teaching method in Paraclinic (40%)
Evaluation is necessary for feedback Evaluation is necessary for feedback for teachers and future planningfor teachers and future planning
Practical works and Practical works and InstrumentsInstruments
Using Microscopes:Using Microscopes: BiologyBiology Parasitological Parasitological Pathology Pathology Histology Histology MicrobiologyMicrobiology
Chemistry:Chemistry: Chemistry Chemistry BiochemistryBiochemistry
Anatomy Modules:Anatomy Modules: AnatomyAnatomy EmbryologyEmbryology Forensic MedicineForensic Medicine
Others:Others: PhysiologyPhysiology PharmacologyPharmacology Public healthPublic health PhysicsPhysics
Practical work room.
AnatomyModels
Practical work room.
Strengths Strengths EDC/JICA EDC/JICA Initiation of teachers for the task Initiation of teachers for the task Better background for future Planning Better background for future Planning
WeaknessesWeaknesses Absence of evaluation experienceAbsence of evaluation experience Difficulty of skill evaluation factDifficulty of skill evaluation fact
OpportunitiesOpportunities Assistance of JICAAssistance of JICA Eager for better Education system in Eager for better Education system in
KMU KMU A comprehensive and scientific planning A comprehensive and scientific planning
for futurefor future
ThreatsThreats Sustainability of the program?Sustainability of the program? Miss collection and miss interpretationMiss collection and miss interpretation
GoalGoal
Improvement of teaching system Improvement of teaching system
ObjectivesObjectives Standardization of teaching methodStandardization of teaching method Strengthening of weak points Strengthening of weak points
MethodsMethods
Time:Time: May 2007May 2007 Mid semester, 2 Mid semester, 2
weeksweeks Class 2Class 2ndnd students students
Random 20 studentsRandom 20 students Distribution, Distribution,
collection and collection and analysis:analysis: Dr Sharifi, Prof Anwar, Dr Sharifi, Prof Anwar,
Prof AhmadzaiProf Ahmadzai
Items in the Items in the questionnairequestionnaire PunctualityPunctuality SkillSkill KnowledgeKnowledge General impressionGeneral impression
Scoring:Scoring: Satisfactory, fair and not Satisfactory, fair and not
fairfair PercentagePercentage
Arigato GozaimasuArigato Gozaimasu
Thank youThank youSharifiSharifi
Evaluation of Paraclinic Evaluation of Paraclinic lecturers lecturers
By:By:
Associated Prof. Ehsanullah Alimi MDAssociated Prof. Ehsanullah Alimi MD
Head, Department of Forensic Head, Department of Forensic MedicineMedicine
December 2006December 2006
IntroductionIntroduction
Feedback by students for Feedback by students for standardization of education standardization of education
Total no. of lecturers in KMUTotal no. of lecturers in KMU 217217 ClinicClinic 151151 ParaclinicParaclinic 6666
Total no. of departmentsTotal no. of departments 3333 ClinicClinic 1919 ParaclinicParaclinic 1414
Introduction Introduction (cont.)(cont.)
Criteria for selection of lecturersCriteria for selection of lecturers MD and higher degreesMD and higher degrees 75% Scoring in undergraduate period75% Scoring in undergraduate period No failure records in undergraduate No failure records in undergraduate
periodperiod Age ( < 35 )Age ( < 35 ) Recommendation by related DepartmentRecommendation by related Department Academic entrance examAcademic entrance exam Approval of Academic council of KMUApproval of Academic council of KMU Assignment by MOHEAssignment by MOHE
Current SituationCurrent Situation
EDC has already collected evaluation EDC has already collected evaluation data for all lecturers in August 2006data for all lecturers in August 2006
The data has not been analyzed The data has not been analyzed because of unknown reasonbecause of unknown reason
WeaknessesWeaknesses
Some negative reaction from Some negative reaction from lecturers lecturers
Absence of evaluation experienceAbsence of evaluation experience Students will evaluate lecturers in Students will evaluate lecturers in
views of reputation (e.g. Strictness views of reputation (e.g. Strictness will be connected to lower will be connected to lower evaluation)evaluation)
GoalGoal Improvement of teaching system Improvement of teaching system
ObjectivesObjectives Standardization of teaching methodStandardization of teaching method Strengthening of lecturers’ weak points Strengthening of lecturers’ weak points Motivation of lecturersMotivation of lecturers Capacity building for lecturersCapacity building for lecturers
MethodsMethods Modification of the current Modification of the current
questionnairequestionnaire Every end of semester Every end of semester Scoring (Good, Fair and not fair)Scoring (Good, Fair and not fair) Calculation of percentageCalculation of percentage Sampling of studentsSampling of students
Sampling method:Sampling method: 30 students, randomized 30 students, randomized
Example of a LectureExample of a Lecture
Implementation ProcessesImplementation Processes
3 groups of 10 students will be 3 groups of 10 students will be selected arbitrarily from 100 2selected arbitrarily from 100 2ndnd class class studentsstudents
10 lecturers in 4 departments 10 lecturers in 4 departments (biochem, physio, microbio, and (biochem, physio, microbio, and pathology) will be evaluatedpathology) will be evaluated
ResourcesResources Personnel:Personnel:
EDC evaluation committee and administrationEDC evaluation committee and administration Academic Vice ChancellorAcademic Vice Chancellor StudentsStudents
Time:Time: Collection: One week in the end of each Collection: One week in the end of each
semester (July 2007)semester (July 2007) Analysis: Quantitative (percentage) by Drs. Analysis: Quantitative (percentage) by Drs.
Alimi, Stanikzai, and Anwar.Alimi, Stanikzai, and Anwar. Dr. Alimi will report the result to the chancellor, Dr. Alimi will report the result to the chancellor,
EDC and JICA project office in August 2007EDC and JICA project office in August 2007
Suggestion Suggestion
All lecturers should be evaluated All lecturers should be evaluated every year regularlyevery year regularly
Students manual for evaluationStudents manual for evaluation
Arigato GozaimasuArigato Gozaimasu
Thank youThank youAlimiAlimi
Assessment of studentAssessment of student
By:By:
Prof. Mohammad Afzal Anwar MDProf. Mohammad Afzal Anwar MD
Head, Department of HistologyHead, Department of Histology
December 2006December 2006
IntroductionIntroduction
Total no. of studentsTotal no. of students 27452745 FacultiesFaculties 44
CurativeCurative PediatricPediatric StomatologyStomatology NursingNursing
Condition to sit in an examinationCondition to sit in an examination Student attendance Student attendance 75%75%
Evaluation of students in end Evaluation of students in end of semesterof semester
Final Examination
Practical Examination)20%(
Theoretical Examination
)80%(
Current StatusCurrent Status
Different departments have different Different departments have different formats of examination papersformats of examination papers Combination of MCQs, SAQs, Essays, etcCombination of MCQs, SAQs, Essays, etc Distribution of marks to different Distribution of marks to different
sectionssections Different departments show different Different departments show different
failure rates of studentsfailure rates of students
Result of Final ExaminationResult of Final Examination100( absolute score)
Failed Students
Succeeded Students
0
50( in old system)
Failed Student
subject subject subject
Second ChanceFailed Student
(next year)
subjectsubject
Third chanceFailed Student
(next year)
Current System Used for 2nd Class or Upper
(Not the Credit System)
Result of Final ExaminationResult of Final Examination100( absolute score)
Failed Students
Succeeded Students
0
55% in credit system
Introduction Introduction (cont.)(cont.)
Credit system and conditions:Credit system and conditions: Currently used for PCB and 1Currently used for PCB and 1stst class class One chance for examOne chance for exam
If failed, must take tutorialIf failed, must take tutorial Pass score for a subject in credit system Pass score for a subject in credit system
is 55is 55 The average of all subject scores for The average of all subject scores for
credit system is 60credit system is 60
GoalGoal Improvement of examination system Improvement of examination system
ObjectivesObjectives Standardization of teaching methodStandardization of teaching method Detection of examination weak points Detection of examination weak points Improvement of questioning systemImprovement of questioning system
MethodsMethods
Collection of papers from different Collection of papers from different departmentsdepartments Decide which method was used for each Decide which method was used for each
paper (MCQ, SAQ, Essay, etc)paper (MCQ, SAQ, Essay, etc) Collection of dataCollection of data
How many students failedHow many students failed How marks were decided for each How marks were decided for each
questionquestion
ResourcesResources
Personnel:Personnel: Dr. Anwar Dr. Anwar Examination committeeExamination committee KMU administrationKMU administration
Time:Time: End of each semesterEnd of each semester
Arigato GozaimasuArigato Gozaimasu
Thank youThank youProf AnwarProf Anwar
Evaluation for Practical works Evaluation for Practical works in Clinical Educationin Clinical Education
By:By:
Assistant Prof. Ghulam Sakhi Rawan Assistant Prof. Ghulam Sakhi Rawan MDMD
Department of Pediatrics, Maiwand Department of Pediatrics, Maiwand HospitalHospital
December 2006December 2006
BackgroundBackground
Clinical Practical works are taught in class Clinical Practical works are taught in class 33rdrd, 4, 4thth, 5, 5thth, and house job (internship), and house job (internship)
Practical work is an important part of Practical work is an important part of teaching method in clinic (40%)teaching method in clinic (40%)
Evaluation is necessary for feedback for Evaluation is necessary for feedback for teachers and future planningteachers and future planning
practical works:practical works: StudentsStudents 4 hours/day4 hours/day House jobHouse job 7 hours/day for a year7 hours/day for a year
Practical works and Practical works and InstrumentsInstruments
class 3class 3rdrd:: Physical examinationPhysical examination ThermometerThermometer SphygmomanometerSphygmomanometer StethoscopeStethoscope Tongue depressorTongue depressor Performing IM,SC and IV InjectionsPerforming IM,SC and IV Injections
Practical works and Practical works and InstrumentsInstruments
(cont.)(cont.) Class 4Class 4thth : :
Physical examinationPhysical examination ThermometerThermometer SphygmomanometerSphygmomanometer StethoscopeStethoscope FetoscopeFetoscope NG and rectal tubes and folly catheterNG and rectal tubes and folly catheter Reading X-Ray filmsReading X-Ray films History takingHistory taking
Practical works and Practical works and InstrumentsInstruments
(cont.)(cont.) Class 5Class 5thth : :
OtoscopeOtoscope OphthalmoscopeOphthalmoscope LaryngoscopeLaryngoscope BronchoscopeBronchoscope Casting Casting Traction and fixation of fracturesTraction and fixation of fractures PuncturesPunctures History takingHistory taking Introduction of diseases Introduction of diseases
Practical works and Practical works and InstrumentsInstruments
(cont.)(cont.)
Note: Students are able to do some Note: Students are able to do some practical works by themselves but practical works by themselves but they will only observe other works. they will only observe other works.
House Job:House Job: Practical works as junior assistant/every Practical works as junior assistant/every
dept.dept. Skin suturingSkin suturing DressingDressing
Current StatusCurrent Status
Some lecturers lack enough skills to Some lecturers lack enough skills to teachteach
Some lecturers are not punctualSome lecturers are not punctual
GoalGoal Improvement of Practical works in Improvement of Practical works in
Clinical EducationClinical Education
ObjectivesObjectives
Standardization of practical worksStandardization of practical works Strengthening of weak points in Strengthening of weak points in
clinical worksclinical works
MethodsMethods Who: Dr. RawanWho: Dr. Rawan To whom: 5To whom: 5thth class students, 10 class students, 10
groupsgroups When: March-June 2007When: March-June 2007 How:How:
Interview with studentsInterview with students Observation by Dr. RawanObservation by Dr. Rawan
Methods Methods (cont.)(cont.)
Format of interview questionsFormat of interview questions TeachersTeachers
PunctualityPunctuality AttitudeAttitude SkillSkill KnowledgeKnowledge AppearanceAppearance
StudentsStudents AttendanceAttendance
InterestInterest KnowledgeKnowledge AttitudeAttitude skillsskills
Arigato GozaimasuArigato Gozaimasu
Thank youThank you Assistant Prof. RawanAssistant Prof. Rawan