Download - for Economic Education
-
7/27/2019 ... for Economic Education
1/3
ANYTHINGPEACEFUL
Behin d Busin ess CyclesOCTOBER15, 2013 by STEVEPATTERSON
We ve all heard the story: An unregulated free market leads to wild boomsand busts. If cowboy capit alists are left without careful
oversight, the economy is doomed to fluctuate like a roller-coaster. Thats why it is the government s job to tame the business cycle.
Given that financial markets are where a lot of t his unregulated mischief takes place, the central bank has a very special role.
This is the conventional wisdom t hese days. It s the story taught unchallenged in schools, repeated in the news, and generally
accepted as trut h.
Libertarians know better. We argue that, in fact, central bankscause the business cycle; they don t correct it. The United States has
not seen even a mildly unregulated financial market in the last century, so if w e wish to identify what causesour booms and busts, it
cannot be laissez-faire capit alism.
The basic Austrian school explanation is compelling: The central bank artificially lowers interest rates by creating moneyexnihilo,
which causes malinvestment and an unsustainable boom. The market eventually corrects itself when resources, labor, and capit al get
reallocated back into their appropriate sectors. This reallocation process is painful it includes bankruptcy and unemployment but
it isnecessary, like the drug addict who has to go through withdrawal before he is healthy again.
I believe thisnarrative to be true, but it is abstract. And if we want t o understand the concepts more concretely, we need to dig
deeper into specific aspects of t he theory.
For example, just howdoes money creation lead to booms?If banks merely lend out more paper bills, why does that result in
disaster?And does the boom really have to be unsustainable? If so, why?
We can answer these questionsby first understanding how banking works in a free market.As this art icle explains, bankscoordinate
the plans of savers and consumers.
To briefly summarize, when someone saves their money in a bank, it becomes available for an entrepreneur to borrow. But even
though an individual might deposit cash at a bank, this coordination is not about paper changing hands. It s about something deeper.
-
7/27/2019 ... for Economic Education
2/3
When individuals save, they are choosing not to consume goods or services. And, at any given time, there is only a certain amount of
goods and services in the economy. The act of saving allows certain people to consume resources in other people s place.
Banks play the role of a middleman, coordinating who gets access to the finite pool of savings. Accurate coordination is paramount to
a healthy economy, and it is why central banksare the root cause of the business cycle.
The amount of savings providesa natural constraint on the number of projects entrepreneurs can undertake at any given time. If
there were an infinite amount of goodsand services at our disposal, anyone could undertake the grandest, most resource-intensive
project imaginable wit hout caring about the consequences. But we live in a world of scarce resources; some projects can go forward
and othersmust wait, or else the savingsw ould run out before all t he projects could be finished.
For example, imagine that a group of bricklayers thinks they have 10 timest he amount of brickst hey actually have in inventory. What
happens after all t heir projects start? They run out of bricks and probably go bankrupt in the process.
This is what happens when central banksstimulate t he economy by creating new money. Banksare encouraged to make loans not
backed by real savings. In contrast to the free-market system, in which individuals have to refrain from consuming goods in order t o
save them, these new loans are made without any party forgoing their consumption. The pool of savings gets depleted faster than it
is replenished.
This increased economic activity usually gets mistaken for real growth, as the economy transitions into the boom phase of the
business cycle. Unfortunately, the boom carries the seedsof an inevitable bust, for a number of reasons.
Many of the new projects entrepreneurs undertake don t have enough realsavingst o finance them. Thisis especially true of longer-
term projects that would not be profitable at higher interest rates. Those projects are only undertaken because the central bank is
pumping out cheap money.
Tangible wealth also gets destroyed during these artificial booms. For example, the resources and labor poured into the U.S. housing
market prior t o 2008 could have been utilized in other sectors of t he economy. Instead, wealth was diverted into housing projects
that proved worthless but the resourcesw ere now unavailable for anything else. Ludwig von Mises called this phenomenon
malinvestment, or literally, bad investment.
When the housing bubble popped, a huge, painful correction had to take place; capital and labor do not seamlessly tr ansition from
one sector of the economy to another. You can t t urn an empty subdivision into, say, an iPhone factory overnight. Temporary
unemployment and bankruptcy are the inevitable results of malinvestment.
The story of business cyclesw ould be bad enough if it ended there. However, when central banks are involved, it rarely does. Central
banks often view an economic bust as reason for further intervention. Whats their solution?Create more money and lower interest
rates even further.
If this spiral of intervention is not halted, central banks run a much higher risk than causing recessions; they risk destroying a currency
Asmore and more money gets pumped into the system, the value of each monetary unit decreases. And, given the reluctance of
central bankst o quit meddling in the economy, so much money can be created t hat it causeshyperinflation an extremely painful
economic scenario when a currency rapidly loses its purchasing power.
This is not mere speculation check out the long list of countries that have destroyed their currencies through hyperinflation in the
last century.
In fact, the United States central bank is currently pursuing a policy of extreme credit expansion, known as quantitative easing. The
first two rounds of quantitative easing have predictably failed, so the third has started, despite lip service of slowing down. If our
economy is not allowed t o correct itself and liquidate all t he malinvestment currently pervading it, the dollar may soon be added t o
the list of currencies destroyed by hyperinflation.
When central banks destroy the relationship betw een savers and consumers, between the amount of currency and t he amount of rea
savings in an economy, we should expect business cycles as a result. And history seems consistently to back up thistheory. Economic
disaster could be avoided if one principle wasclearly understood: Governments and central banks cannot create wealth by printing
money. Real savings do not come fresh off a printing press.
SHARETHIS
-
7/27/2019 ... for Economic Education
3/3
ABOUT
STEVEPATTERSON
Steve Patt erson is a freelance motion graphics producer and writer. He is the creator ofThe Truth About... educational animation
series.
Copyright 2013 Foundation for Economic
Education. All RightsReserved.