don't just gamble: data driven strategy for the launch of 2 new global analytics products
DESCRIPTION
Price Strategy and Analytics Strategy studies for the launch of 2 new analytics products. Real case study made anonymous (upon written approval of the company involved).TRANSCRIPT
Don’t Just Gamble
Marco De Cesaris http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about
Data
Driven
Strategy
Launching 2 New Global Analytics Products
Data Driven Product Strategy
Product 1 (P1 PRO): price strategy for a new analytics product
Product 2 (P2): implementing a product analytics infrastructure for a new product
Marco De Cesaris http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about
Introduction
• This is a real advisory document that I conceived and produced upon request of a global company.
• I have never received any compensations in any forms for this work.
• In order to make this document publicly available and for respect of the company in object, I got written approval from the company in order to publish this work and I removed any identifiable information for the company in object.
• I replaced the name of the company with a generic name “Client”. • I also replaced the name of the 2 products respectively with
“Product 1 PRO” (or “P1 PRO”), and “Product 2” (or “P2”). • Then replaced the name of the different publishing platforms with
the generic “Platform #”.
• For any information, details, questions, suggestions feel free to contact me directly through my LinkedIn account: http://cn.linkedin.com/in/marcodecesaris/ .
3 http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about Marco De Cesaris
Product 1 PRO (P1 PRO)
Price strategy for a new analytics product
4 http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about Marco De Cesaris
Summary
1. Product description 2. Web survey methodology
– Additional Questions
3. Data analysis 4. Pricing, insights and recommendations
5 http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about Marco De Cesaris
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 6
Product Description
Marco De Cesaris
1
Product Description
• Target audience: smaller publishers
• Features: end-user demographic, integration with customer’s product tracking and crash systems, social media listening, sentiment analysis, etc…
• Price assumption: 15 USD per month
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 7 Marco De Cesaris
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 8
Web Survey Methodology
Marco De Cesaris
2
Web Survey Methodology
• Running period: 1 day
• Explicitly collected data: – Publishing platform, interest in this
product, favorite platforms for this product, five different prices, demo, turnover.
• Sample size: 203 users (called customers from now on)
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 9 Marco De Cesaris
Survey: Strengths & Weaknesses
• Strengths: – Cheap/Free; Fast; Onsite (directly
managed and data owned); Possibility of data matching with existing data and customers behavior; Data integration using existing data for registered customers
• Weaknesses: – Only ran for 1 day; Some key questions
missing (e.g. weighting the different features); see questions list in the backup section.
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 10 Marco De Cesaris
Robustness And Future Research
• See questions list in the backup. – E.g.: Analyzing web traffic and choosing
the right period in order to avoid anomalies and biases; Newbies VS. Long term customers; Level of engagement with current product(s); Survey language; Etc…
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 11 Marco De Cesaris
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 12
Data Analysis
Marco De Cesaris
3
Data Analysis
• Data cleansing • Overview and Insights
13 http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about Marco De Cesaris
Data Cleansing
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 14 Marco De Cesaris
Data Cleansing 1/2
• Main focus of this analysis is pricing. • Several price fields were completely
blanks. • There is a logical order in the price
questions: e.g. defining a “cheap” price = 5 USD, it conflicts with the same user defining a “too expensive” price = 5 USD.
How was it sorted out?
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 15 Marco De Cesaris
Data Cleaning 2/2
1. Removed 48 records where all the 5 price questions were blank; 2. Removed 19 records where:
“too expensive != blank” <= “worth it” “too expensive != blank” <= “cheap” “too expensive != blank” <= “bargain”
3. Removed 6 records where: “bargain != blank” < “cheap”
4. Removed 1 record where: “worth it != blank” < “bargain”
5. Removed 3 outliers (less than 2,5% of total left records, only upper end). Logic: as soon as the “vertical” price double from previous ordered value. Found 2 outliers in “cheap” and 1 outlier in “too expensive”.
ORIGINAL SAMPLE: 203 users FINAL CLEANSED SAMPLE: 126 users
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 16 Marco De Cesaris
Overview And Insights
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 17 Marco De Cesaris
62% customers1 between 26-45
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 18
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
Under 25 26 to 35 36 to 45 46 to 55 56 to 65 Over 65
Age Distribution
Marco De Cesaris
1. Surveyed customers
Gender balance
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 19
51% 45%
4%
Gender Distribution
F
M
(blank)
Marco De Cesaris
$10K-20K is the dominant segment*
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 20
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
Turnover Distribution
*Bear in mind that the last category is the upper end and it includes everything above $300K
Marco De Cesaris
Cross Platform Publishing
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 21
Platform 1 98%
Platform 2 94%
Platform 3 68%
Platform 4 32%
68% of customers publish on 3 platforms: the biggest being Plat 1 and Plat 2, followed by Plat 3.
Q1. Is the platform development’s cost strongly related to the number of platforms launched? Q2. Do we have any strong correlation between maintenance/launch cost and number of platforms?
Marco De Cesaris
Product Differentiation Opportunity?*
• Priority should be given to Plat 2, followed by Plat 1 and then Plat 3. P1 PRO on Plat 4 is not requested.
• Plat 2 seems to be the most popular platform for these new features.
• Maybe there is a feel of lack of analytics on Plat 2 (vs. Plat 1)?
• Are publishers seeking ways of better monetize Plat 2?
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 22
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
On which platform customers want P1
PRO?
*Additional questions in the next survey/research (weighting single features).
Marco De Cesaris
Pla
tfo
rm 3
Pla
tfo
rm 2
Pla
tfo
rm 1
P1 PRO “Users” Publish On All Platfs
• Across customers who are willing to have P1 PRO, almost all of them are already publishing on Plat 1 and Plat 2.
• Plat 3 follows, where 70% of customers who want P1 PRO are publishing.
• Across customers who want P1 PRO, only 33% publish on Plat 4. The number of customers who want P1 PRO on Plat 4 is irrelevant.
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 23
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
TOT
Where P1 PRO potential customers
are publishing
Marco De Cesaris
Pla
tfo
rm 1
Pla
tfo
rm 2
Pla
tfo
rm 3
Pla
t 4
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 24
Pricing, Insights & Recommendations
Marco De Cesaris
4
Price, Insights & Recommendations
• In order to identify the most suitable price we need to understand whether the objective is penetration or revenue optimization.
• Contingency table was built between “worth it” and “acceptable” price1.
• An eye has been kept on the “other” prices’ categories, to make sure there was no conflict with the final recommendation.
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 25
1. Logical assumption (according to the questions in the survey) is that if a user accept price X, but also states that the product is still worth it price Y>X, then will subscribe even for price Y. The other prices’ categories have been used as a limit references.
Marco De Cesaris
15$ Not Necessarily The Best Choice
Worth it Price
Acc
ep
tab
le P
rice
Count
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 26
• Most customers who “accept” a price of 15 USD actually consider the product “worth it” 25 USD.
• Across customers who consider the product “worth it” 25 USD (and would still buy it) there are also several customers who declared to “accept” a price lower than 25 USD.
NEED TO OPTIMIZE THE PRICE
Marco De Cesaris
Pricing Strategy
Price (USD)
# customers subscribing
Monthly Rev
(USD)
% penetration Objective Option
12 Option
22
15 100 1500 93% Penetration - -
20 92 1840 86% Hybrid - 2000
25 78 1950 73% Revenue 2300 2500
30 62 1860 58% - -
35 47 1645 44% - -
40 45 1800 42% - -
Option 1: Unless priority is penetration, we could set an initial price of 20 USD per month, reaching 86% of customers interested in P1 PRO1, and make this as a promotional offer for the first three months, then eventually apply the official price of 25 USD (this price is mathematically accepted by 73% of customers who want P1 PRO).
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 27
Option 2: Promotional price of 15 USD (focus on penetration) and persuade initial subscribers for the official price of 20/25 USD from the third month going on. Option 3: 25 USD, and invest part of this revenue3 in marketing activities. 1. Assumption is that the removed records won’t be interested in subscribing to P1 PRO. This will keep conservative revenue
projection. We could further investigate the removed records (and ask additional questions) in order to understand whether they could be part of the subscribers base.
2. From the third month on. 3. (25$-15$)*(73%)*(# interested customer base). As long as 15 USD is a price that makes Client happy and on balance, we can
use this calculated budget as a “free” budget for marketing activities to increase brand/product perceived value
Marco De Cesaris
Pricing Considerations
Option 1 and 2 in the previous slide (promotional price for the first 3 months) could potentially persuade the early skeptical customers to keep the subscription for a higher price that they wouldn’t accept at the initial stage, but maybe are willing to accept after trying the product.
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 28 Marco De Cesaris
20-30 USD Per Month Is The Price
Cheap (USD) Bargain (USD) Worth it (USD) Too Exp (USD) Acc (USD)
Mean 11.93 23.07 37.02 56.95 26.14
Median 10.00 20.00 30.00 50.00 20.00
Mode 5.00 10.00 50.00 50.00 20.00
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 29
A price of 15 USD could be perceived as a cheap price (too close to Mean and Median for Cheap). A too expensive price would start from 50 USD. Considering the values of Median and Mean for Bargain, Worth it and Acceptable price, a recommended price would fall in between those values. A price between 20 to 30 USD is the right choice (unless penetration is a priority for Client). To be noted in the category “worth it” the “mode” value is higher than both Median and Mean.
Marco De Cesaris
P1 PRO Revenue Projections
S = # smaller publishers 62% S1 = base of customers seriously interested in P1 PRO
Monthly Revenue for P1 PRO =
Monthly price2 * % penetration2 * 62% S
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 30
1. 62% = 126/203, where 126 are the records after cleansed initial sample. The conservative assumption here is the 203-126 records are not interested in P1 PRO.
2. Monthly price and % penetration from the table on slide 27.
Marco De Cesaris
Additional Considerations
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 31 Marco De Cesaris
Focus: 26-35 And 36-45 Years Old
62% of the customers surveyed is between 26-45 years old.
55% of men 26-35 would consider worth it a price higher then 40 USD per month, while only 20% of women in the same age range would agree on it.
71% of women 36-45 would consider worth it a price higher than 40 USD per month, while only 50% of the men in the same age range would agree on it.
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 32
Gender
Age
Pri
ce W
ort
h it
Younger Men and
Older Women would pay
more
Marco De Cesaris
10-20$: Heterogeneous Turnover
Customers with turnover 10-20K USD1 are happy to pay either 10, 30, 50 USD per month. Worth it investigate further. Could lead to a product differentiation (P1 PRO and P1 ENTERPRISE). It could be that the different segments prefer completely different features, hence 2 products with different features could be developed in order to also maximize the revenue for Client and the needs of our customers. Customers with turnover more than 300K USD are heterogeneous as well (but slightly more inclined to higher price): happy to pay 20 or even 50 USD per month.
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 33
Turnover
Pri
ce W
ort
h it
Opportunity for Product
Differentiation: P1 PRO VS. P1 ENTERPRISE
1. Segment 10-20K USD turnover is worth it further investigation, even because it represents 24% of customers who declared their turnover. It is the largest segment.
Marco De Cesaris
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 34
Q&A
Marco De Cesaris
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 35
Product 2 (P2)
Implementing a product analytics infrastructure for a new product.
Tracking, Key Performance Areas & Metrics
Marco De Cesaris
Summary
1. Product description – What is in it for Client – Connecting Ad Networks to Customer’s
Account on Client’s Platform
2. Tracking solution – Key Performance Areas & Metrics – Tracking Systems – Other processes/reports/interfaces – Business decisions supported
3. Some thoughts
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 36 Marco De Cesaris
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 37
Product Description
Marco De Cesaris
1
Product Description
Product 2 (P2) allows users to link their P1 Account with their Ad Network Accounts. Once this is done users are able to dig into their: • Advertising Revenue • Advertising Expense Full picture of customer’s product Revenue is provided (One off Sales + Recurrent Sales + Advertising).
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 38 Marco De Cesaris
What Is In It For Client?
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 39 Marco De Cesaris
What Is In It For Client?
• New generation of Market Intelligence Product.
• Additional Revenue/Customers for Client by providing insights on Ad Revenue/Ad Expense related to customers’ products (Intelligence Product).
• Possibility of combining these data with data from other sources (e.g. Turnover/Ad Revenue; Launch time/Ad Revenue; Ad Expense/Product Ranking; etc…)
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 40 Marco De Cesaris
Connecting Ad Networks To Customer’s Account on Client’s Platform
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 41 Marco De Cesaris
Connecting Ad Networks
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 42
Login Page Logged In Account Management
Ad Network Selection
Ad Networks Credentials
Backend Checking
Error Page
Error Email
Successful Page.
Data Collection Started
Successful Email
Ad Networks Campaigns List
Campaigns Linking
Ready To Use Product 2
Back-end system / Database
Web Page / Web Analytics Tool
Marco De Cesaris
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 43
Tracking Solution
Marco De Cesaris
2
Tracking Solutions
• Key Performance Areas & Metrics • Tracking Systems • Other processes/reports/interfaces • Business decisions supported
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 44 Marco De Cesaris
Key Performance Areas & Metrics
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 45 Marco De Cesaris
Key Performance Areas & Metrics
Measuring P2 Success (Client’s Perspective) Key Performance
Area Metric
Acquisition Awareness: # mentions/pr/articles/searches over a time period New visitors over a period
Activation
Cost Per Activation Net P2 Adds: New P2 Users – P2 Cancelled
P2 Activation: Funnel completion: # completed / # started
P2 Activation: # attempts to success per user
P2 Activation: # error mails / # total mail AND # unique clicks on error link mail/referred successful completions
New Users Activation: # new users referred by P2 / # total new users
# new users acquired / # total visitors over specific time period
P2 Activation: # P2 completion / # Total P1 active users
Retention Engagement: % P2 active users
Engagement: % P1 active users / % P2 active users
Revenue
# P2 Intelligence Customers / # Total Intelligence Customers
P2 # free users who Upgraded to Intelligence Customer / # P2 Users over a time period
# ad networks linked per user / # total ad networks available over spec time period
P2 Intelligence Rev / Total Intelligence Rev
# Intelligence Products Sold per customer over time period
Revenue per customer over a time period
Referrals # Shares over a time period
Users Satisfaction & Product Improvement
Surveys: users suggestions, features needed, dislikes, etc.
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 46 Marco De Cesaris
In Case Of Paid Media
• On top of CPA, also Paid Media performance by channel would need to be taken into account.
• Some example of metrics: – CPA by Channel – % P2 Active Users by Channel
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 47 Marco De Cesaris
Key Performance Areas & Metrics
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 48
Measuring P2 Success (Customer’s Perspective)
Key Performance Area Metric
Activation P2 Activation: # attempts to success per user
Retention
Engagement: % P2 active users
Engagement: # ad networks linked per user / # total ad networks available over spec time period
Engagement: Time spent per user on P2 section / Time spent per user on P1 section
Referrals # Shares over a time period
Users Satisfaction & Product Improvement Surveys: users suggestions, features needed, dislikes, etc.
Marco De Cesaris
Tracking Systems
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 49 Marco De Cesaris
Tracking Systems
1. Web Analytics Tool – As most of the metrics in the previous slides are based
on web pages tracking
2. Internal Database / CRM system – Mainly for PII, for storage of API Keys, Passwords,
Customers Spend for Client’s Products, Account Creation Date, User Declared Information, etc…
3. Business Intelligence Tool – Later on, in order to aggregate all the data from
different sources with the objective of achieving a SCV. Initially this is not needed as most of the tracking/measurement can be monitored through simple Web Analytics UI + Data from Database/CRM (through SQL queries or CRM UI).
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 50 Marco De Cesaris
Other Processes, Reports, Interfaces
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 51 Marco De Cesaris
Processes, Reports, Interfaces
• Usual daily/weekly/monthly reports
• One Special Metric: # New Users by P2 / # Existing P1 Users Upgrades to P2
• Display Real Time Performance Across The World – Display the OMTM on monitors within the different
offices around the world so that everybody within the company knows in real time how P2 is performing in real time and can feel his/her contribution to the achievement (or alternatively feel the immediate need of actions to be taken in order to improve the performance)
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 52 Marco De Cesaris
P2 Performance Display
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 53 Marco De Cesaris
P2 New Users
Yesterday Today
120 198
Business Decisions Supported
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 54 Marco De Cesaris
Few Examples 1/3
• If “unsuccessful” customers are not completing the P2 linking through the error email, then optimize through on site / off site retargeting.
• Is there any drop off point in the P2 funnel? Then optimize accordingly.
• If P2 is not perceived valuable to intelligence customers then highlight the benefits through targeting/pr.
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 55 Marco De Cesaris
Few Examples 2/3
• Is P2 producing additional revenue?
• Is P2 producing additional new intelligence customers?
• Spend more money on New Users Acquisition through P2 promo or Optimizing Existing P1 customers base?
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 56 Marco De Cesaris
Few Examples 3/3
• Which one is the most efficient customer activation channel?
• If P2 customers are not upgrading to intelligence customers, tease them through case studies or targeted campaigns (on/off site)
• If P2 customers have a common profile, then target similar customers/users who are not P2 customers yet
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 57 Marco De Cesaris
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 58
Some Thoughts
Marco De Cesaris
3
Some Thoughts 1/2
• Ad Networks is just part of the Advertising. How about if a customer’s product allows an Advertiser to buy Ad Inventory directly from a Publisher (without any needs to go through an Ad Network)?
• The tracking system mentioned in the previous slides would be beneficial for all the different business units/departments: – Front-end UI/UX -> Test Different Layouts; A/B testing; Path Analysis; – Back-end -> understanding where customers are having problems in connecting/linking the
ad networks; suggestion on identify a better way (automatic way) of linking Ad Network “Campaigns” with customer’s account on Client’s platform; Double check trends of web analytics with internal database data
– Customer Segmentation: Profiling P2 customers and target similar profiles; Channel conversion; Existing P1 customers VS. New customers; etc…
• Customers must spend time manually linking campaigns to individual products: how about we create a smart system that can read and take a “guess” to the most reliable matches between products and “Campaigns”? (to be confirmed with just a click by the customer). We could do that through textual analysis (assuming the “campaigns” are identified through a string of characters leading to meaningful words). Another option could be given by providing recommendations on how to name the different “campaigns” (name and convention) so that whenever new “campaigns” are imported in P2 those are automatically linked to the different products. E.g. campaign-name: id-productname-period-device-size (this would also provide additional data to both customers and Client’s Intelligence Products). Think for example by writing a report about Ad Revenue by Ad Size, on which devices and during which period ( just to mention few extra bit of information).
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 59 Marco De Cesaris
Some Thoughts 2/2
• Relation between products and Ad Networks can be: – 1 to many – Many to 1 – 1 to 1 – Many to many
• On top of it we have 2 ways of linking Ad Networks: Ad Networks as Ad Serving Platforms within the products (producing Revenue for our customers), and Ad Networks as Ad buying Platforms for promoting the products (producing Cost/Ad Expense for our customers). Those can be completely different Ad Networks.
• Additionally Ad Networks include Mobile, Web, Outdoor, TV, and other kinds of Medium. • P2 customers eventually would definitely be interested in the Ad Profit (maybe even by
Device or by kind of Ad Network – e.g. Mobile Ad Network, Web Ad Network). • Will P2 also be available in Client’s App? It could happen that Tablet customers adopt P2
at a higher rate than the Web customers. We should definitely keep an eye on it. Assumption is that customers on tablet are always logged in, while customers on web are not.
• Connecting Ad Networks: The third bullet point states: “Click on the name of an ad network….”. I think would be great and better if we can provide a “SELECT” all the ad networks one off through a tick box and wherever the tick box is ticked we expand the form fields to allow typing in the credential for each ad network ( just on a single web page).
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 60 Marco De Cesaris
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 61
Q&A
Marco De Cesaris
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 62
Backup
Marco De Cesaris
P1 PRO Questions List 1/2
• Was the survey free? • How do you define “smaller” publishers? Is this related to the turnover? Then there is a
risk that you included in the survey also bigger publishers (not sure if you wanted it or not). Is more than $300K turnover considered as a big publisher? Do you want to sell P1 PRO also to big publishers?
• Survey ran only one day. • Which day? • Why that day? • Any campaigns/PRs activities around that period? • Any anomalies in the traffic for that day? • Why not analyzing periodic web traffic and run survey accordingly? • How was the survey taken? Popup? Click on a link? Visibility? Randomly? How did you
build the sample? Specific targeted audience? What was the success completion rate? • How often customers of P1 use the service? How many times per day? Per week? Per
month? • What is the different engagement? • Any trends showing that newbies engage less than long term customers? This could
massively affect price strategy and hugely increase selling price for this service and also revenue.
• Country/Language could affect how users understand the questions. Language used in the survey?
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 63 Marco De Cesaris
P1 PRO Questions List 2/2
• Was there any incentives/promotions to take the survey? Why would a customer take the survey?
• Many records where blanks (price columns). Was there any questions to double check the intentions/interests of these customers? Would the survey stop or proceed accordingly in case customers were not interested in the product? Potentially a further investigation would help in understanding whether these customers don’t mind about price or they are not interested about P1 PRO, or any other cases. This would definitely help also with more accurate revenue projections.
• Any correlations between price-customer engagement? Price-account opening date? • Customers of P1 maybe are not buyer decision makers or influencers; if there was a
present price for P1 it could happen that those customers/users don’t even know that price.
• Some of the information about customers could be double checked against their activity on P1 (e.g. where they publish), rather than just being asked within the survey.
• Were there any segmentations in the surveys between giants customers and indies customers (on top of the information about turnover?).
• Questions to be included in the survey (or as a next step) would be to weight the different features offered within P1 PRO. It could happen that specific segments prefer just specific features and are happy to pay a higher price => We could develop 2 different products for different prices and different audience/needs: “P1 PRO” and “P1 ENTERPRISE”.
• Right sample calculation: http://www.surveysystem.com/sscalc.htm
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 64 Marco De Cesaris
EXPERTISE:
Marketing Technologies, Custom Data Solutions, Advertising, Data Strategy & Planning, Advanced Targeting, Marketing, Smart Advertising,
Innovation, CRM, DSPs, DMPs, Data Enrichment,
Measurement, Online & Social Media,
Insights and Analytics, Optimization.
COMPANIES/CLIENTS I worked for:
About Me
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 65 Marco De Cesaris
http://www.linkedin.com/in/marcodecesaris
Get In Touch
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 66 Marco De Cesaris
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 67 Marco De Cesaris
Credits
Page 67,68: https://www.flickr.com/photos/monana7/324669781/
Page 1: https://www.flickr.com/photos/untitlism/2580067021/sizes/o/
http://www.marcodecesaris.com/about 68 Marco De Cesaris