does happiness have to cost the earth - tufts[1]
TRANSCRIPT
Does Happiness have to cost the Earth?Tufts UniversityBoston16th October 2008
Nic Markscentre for well-being, nef (the new economics foundation)
Who are nef?• An independent UK think-tank (founded 1986)• Inspired by 3 principles
1. Ecological Sustainability2. Social Justice3. People’s Well-being
• Well-being programme set up in 2001 to address question: What would policy look like if people’s well-being was its aim?
• centre for well-being - 2006
Feelings about Life on Earth
FEARANGERDEPRESSION
HAPPINESS(CHALLENGE)OPTIMISM ENGAGEMENT
And statistics: including nef’s Happy Planet Index
Insights from Science of W-B
Evolutionary role of emotions:
So-called negative emotions have been well-understood :
Fear, Anger, Disgust and Depression
but what are positive emotions such as happiness, joy and contentment about?
Evolutionary role of Emotions
Barbara Friedrickson’s theory of BROADEN and BUILD is however revolutionary:
1. Positive emotions BROADEN our thoughts & actions: paying more attention, being more creative & playful, open to relationships, and flexible.
2. Positive emotions BUILD psychological resources: resilience, coping, physical abilities, emotional intelligence, social skills and self mastery.
Role of Emotions at Work
Friedrickson and Losado: Positive teams at work
Study of 60 Strategic Business Unit teams, each of eight people, all from within the same organisation.
The SBUs performance categorised in terms of:– Profitability (SBU profit & loss accounts)– Customer satisfaction (surveys & interviews)– 360’ evaluations of team members
Each “utterance” in meeting was coded in terms of:– Positivity (support, encouragement, appreciation)– Negativity (disapproval, sarcasm, cynicism)
Role of Emotions at Work
Friedrickson and Losado: Positive teams at work
LOW (19)
MEDIUM (26)
HIGH (15)
Positivity / Negativity ratio
Team Performance
Role of Emotions at Work
Friedrickson and Losado: Positive teams at work
0.36LOW (19)
1.86MEDIUM (26)
5.61HIGH (15)
Positivity / Negativity ratio
Team Performance
Role of Emotions at Work
Friedrickson and Losado: Positive teams at work
0.030.050.36LOW (19)
0.620.671.86MEDIUM (26)
0.941.145.61HIGH (15)
Other / Self
Inquiry / Advocacy
Positivity / Negativity ratio
Team Performance
Role of Emotions at WorkHigh performance teams operate in an expanded chaotic (creative) emotional space.
Mid performance teams are still somewhat creative.
Low performance teams ‘collapse’ into a non-inquiring ‘strange attractor’.
Role of Emotions at Work
Friedrickson and Losado: Positive teams at work
Magic RatioPositive : Negative
3 : 1to
8 : 1
Feelings about Life on Earth
FEARANGERDEPRESSION
HAPPINESS(CHALLENGE)OPTIMISM ENGAGEMENT
And statistics: including nef’s Happy Planet Index
We’re consuming too much
< 1 planet living
> 1 planet living
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
12000
14000
16000
1961
1963
1965
1967
1969
1971
1973
1975
1977
1979
1981
1983
1985
1987
1989
1991
1993
1995
1997
1999
2001
Glo
bal h
ecta
res
(mill
ions
)
Global biocapacityGlobal footprint
Life Satisfaction
All things considered, how satisfied are you with your life as a whole nowadays? Extremely
Dissatisfied 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Extremely Satisfied
“A cognitive measure of well-being with some affect components” – Ed Diener
“Someone’s thoughts about their feelings” – Daniel Nettle
“What you feel when you think about your life” – Danny Kahnemann
Happiness in the UK- as measured by life satisfaction
Distribution of Life Satisfaction -UK
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Life Satisfaction Score
% o
f cas
es
-1.25
-1.00
-0.75
-0.50
-0.25
0.00
0.25
-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Years
Cen
tere
d Li
fe S
atis
fact
ion
Year of Widowhood
Micro data: Widowhood and Well-being
-1.25
-1.00
-0.75
-0.50
-0.25
0.00
0.25
-9 -8 -7 -6 -5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Years
Cen
tere
d Li
fe S
atis
fact
ion
Micro data: Divorce and Well-being
Year of Divorce
Micro data: Marriages and Well-being
Marriage Paths of Life Satisfaction
-1
-0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Years of Marriage
Adj
uste
d Li
fe S
atis
fact
ion
Mean Positive GroupNegative Group
GDP and Life SatisfactionA Challenge to the Political Status Quo
UK - GDP and Life Satisfaction 1973 - 2002
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
120%
140%
160%
180%
200%
1973 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001
GDP
Life Satisfaction
Diminishing marginal returnsof well-being to income
Life satisfaction and Household income in the UK
5.00
5.50
6.00
6.50
7.00
7.50
8.00
£0 £20,000
£40,000
£60,000
£80,000
£100,000
£120,000
£140,000
Household total net income
Life
Sat
isfa
ctio
n (0
-10)
Diminishing marginal returnsof well-being to income
Life Satisfaction and Income Quintiles
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
Low Income Low-MediumIncome
MediumIncome
High-MediumIncome
High Income
Life
Sat
isfa
ctio
n (0
-10)
Average Social Connection
Diminishing marginal returnsof well-being to income
Life Satisfaction and Income Quintiles
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
Low Income Low-MediumIncome
MediumIncome
High-MediumIncome
High Income
Life
Sat
isfa
ctio
n (0
-10)
Average Social Connection
Income & Social Connections
Income and Social Connectedness
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
Low Income Low-MediumIncome
MediumIncome
High-MediumIncome
High Income
Life
Sat
isfa
ctio
n (0
-10)
Strong Social ConnectionsAverage Social ConnectionsPoor Social Connections
Income & Social Connections
Income and Social Connectedness
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
Low Income Low-MediumIncome
MediumIncome
High-MediumIncome
High Income
Life
Sat
isfa
ctio
n (0
-10)
Strong Social ConnectionsAverage Social ConnectionsPoor Social Connections
Income & Social Connections
Income and Social Connectedness
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
7.5
8.0
8.5
Low Income Low-MediumIncome
MediumIncome
High-MediumIncome
High Income
Life
Sat
isfa
ctio
n (0
-10)
Strong Social ConnectionsAverage Social ConnectionsPoor Social Connections
The future needs to be …
… Happier
… Fairer
… and lower carbon!
… and here’s how we can measure if we’re getting there
A Happy Planet Index
Launched by nef in July 2006HDI style rank order of nationsMeasure of the “Ecological efficiency with
which human well-being is delivered”Over 1,000,000 downloads to date
What do Indicators Indicate?
Human system
Ecosystem
Culture
Social Capital
Governance
Economy
Education Healthcare
Natural Capital
Biodiversity
CO2emissions
Soil erosion
Water quality Air quality
What do Indicators Indicate?
Human system
Ecosystem
Culture
Social Capital
Governance
Economy
Education Healthcare
Natural Capital
Biodiversity
CO2emissions
Soil erosion
Water quality Air quality
Resource demand
What do Indicators Indicate?
Human system
Ecosystem
Resource demand
Ecosystem well-being
Human well-being
Culture
Social Capital
Governance
Economy
Education Healthcare
Natural Capital
Biodiversity
CO2emissions
Soil erosion
Water quality Air quality
What HPI measures
Human system
Resource demand
Human well-being
Happy and Long Lives
Resource Use
(divided by)
What HPI measures
Human system
Resource demand
Human well-being
(Life Sat) * (Life Exp)
Eco Footprint
(divided by)
Country comparisons
7.1UK
6.9Mexico
7.6Canada
7.4USA
7.5Costa Rica
HPIEco Foot
Life Exp
Life SatCountry
Country comparisons
78.47.1UK
75.16.9Mexico
80.07.6Canada
77.47.4USA
78.27.5Costa Rica
HPIEco Foot
Life Exp
Life SatCountry
Country comparisons
5.478.47.1UK
2.575.16.9Mexico
6.480.07.6Canada
9.577.47.4USA
2.178.27.5Costa Rica
HPIEco Foot
Life Exp
Life SatCountry
Country comparisons
40.3 (108th)5.478.47.1UK
54.4 (38th)2.575.16.9Mexico
39.8 (111th)6.480.07.6Canada
28.8 (150th)9.577.47.4USA
66.0 (3rd)2.178.27.5Costa Rica
HPIEco Foot
Life Exp
Life SatCountry
HPI in Europe over time
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
1961 1966 1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001
% c
hang
e si
nce
1961
HLYFootprintEfficiency
HPI 2050: One Planet Living©
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
1961 1966 1971 1976 1981 1986 1991 1996 2001
%ch
ange
sinc
e19
61
FootprintHLYEfficiency
2050
60 - 80% reduction in CO2 emissions
Life Expectancy 80yrsLife Satisfaction 8/10
Resource efficiency to improve by over 80%
A reason to be optimistic
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Footprint centile group
Life
sat
isfa
ctio
n (0
-10)
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
Ecological Footprint
Mean Life Satisfaction
One planet living
No.
of p
lane
ts (0
-10)
Figure 2: Ecological Footprint andsubjective life satisfaction in the UK
We can do it together…
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
Footprint centile group
Life
sat
isfa
ctio
n (0
-10)
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
8.0
9.0
10.0
Ecological Footprint
Mean Life Satisfaction
One planet living
No.
of p
lane
ts (0
-10)
Figure 2: Ecological Footprint andsubjective life satisfaction in the UK
An experiment
A
B C
Which is more similar to A?
Attention to the detail
Attention to the relationship
What else we are doing?
Well-being at workBuilt environment and well-beingCampaign about children’s well-beingInnovation and well-beingNational Accounts of Well-being
What Nat Accounts measure
Human system
Ecosystem
Resource demand
Ecosystem well-being
Human well-being
Culture
Social Capital
Governance
Economy
Education Healthcare
Natural Capital
Biodiversity
CO2emissions
Soil erosion
Water quality Air quality
What Nat Accounts measure
Human system
Human well-being
Culture
Social Capital
Governance
Economy
Education Healthcare
What Nat Accounts measure
Human system
Human well-being
Culture
Social Capital
Governance
Economy
Education Healthcare
What Nat Accounts measure
Human system
Personal well-being
Culture
Social Capital
Governance
Economy
Education Healthcare
Social
well-being
What Nat Accounts measure
Human system
Personal well-being
Culture
Social Capital
Governance
Economy
Education Healthcare
Social
well-being
Draft Structure of Accounts
Personal well-being
Emotional well-being
Meaning and
purpose
Engage-mentAutonomy+ve Affect -ve Affect
(Physical) Vitality
Positive function-
ing
Satisfying life
Resilience and self-esteem
Self-esteem Optimism Resilience Compet-
ence
Draft Structure of Accounts
Social well-being
Supportive relationships
Sense of community
Family Friends Belonging Trust
Preliminary Results
Well-beings
4.00
4.50
5.00
5.50
6.00
6.50
4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50
Personal
Soci
al
Preliminary Results
Austria
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00health
vitality
-ve affect
+ve affect
lifesat
resources
autonomy
competence
engagement
community
friends
family
Preliminary Results
Spain
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00health
vitality
-ve affect
+ve affect
lifesat
resources
autonomy
competence
engagement
community
friends
family
Austria
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00health
vitality
-ve affect
+ve affect
lifesat
resources
autonomy
competence
engagement
community
friends
family
Preliminary Results
Ukraine
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00health
vitality
-ve affect
+ve affect
lifesat
resources
autonomy
competence
engagement
community
friends
family
UK
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00health
vitality
-ve affect
+ve affect
lifesat
resources
autonomy
competence
engagement
community
friends
family
What can you do?
For a Lasting Happiness – be kinder to yourself and others, invest your effort in activities you are passionate about
For a Contagious Happiness – random and targeted acts of kindness, pro-social activities, generosity/altruism
For a Just Happiness – consider people less fortunate than yourself, become engaged in projects that genuinely impact them, question the dominant economic paradigm.
For a Lighter Happiness – savor the slower life, enjoy the familiarity of home and local spaces, value the quality of your experiences rather than material goods, develop your own good life (don’t buy into the marketing companies’ false promises)
For a Happy Planet – get the report, do the on-line questionnaire, join nef, or even make a career of working towards a happier, fairer and lower carbon world
Happiness doesn’t have to cost the Earth!
Contact Details: Nic [email protected]
Reports downloadable fromwww.neweconomics.orgwww.happyplanetindex.org