dod director defense systems acquiring capabilities … sponsored documents... · ppt file · web...
TRANSCRIPT
1
Acquiring CapabilitiesJuly 15, 2005
Dr. Glenn F. LamartinDirector, Defense SystemsOffice of the Under Secretary of Defense Acquisition, Technology and Logistics
2
Current SituationWhat We Need to Do Better
Requirements• Adapting to changing
conditions• Matching operational needs
with solutions• Overcoming biases of Services
and others• Moving to transform military
Acquisition• Acquiring systems-of-systems• Making system decisions in a joint, mission
context• Transitioning technology• Assessing complexity of new work and
ability to perform it• Controlling schedule and cost• Passing operational tests• Ensuring a robust industrial basePPBES
• Laying analytical foundation for budget
• Aligning budgets with acquisition decisions
Sustainment • Controlling O&S costs• Reducing logistics tails
Personnel and Readiness
• Treating people as a resource
3
A Capabilities Approach to Acquisition
• Extend focus beyond individual system acquisition• Apply a capabilities-based approach
– Make decisions on systems within a capabilities context – Engineer the relationships across the set of systems that
together satisfy the need – Synchronize the interaction among FoS/SoS to satisfy
multiple capabilities • Influence other key Department processes
- Shape strategic guidance- Inform development of joint concepts and requirements- Balance programming guidance
4
DoD End-to-End Capabilities Based Planning Process
• LRIP• FOT&E
• Refined concept
• Analysis of Alternatives
• Technology Strategy
• Systems Engineering Plan
• Affordable military-useful increment
• Technology demonstrated
• Initial KPPs
• Revise KPPs• Detailed
design• System
integration• DT&E/IOT&E
•Capabilities•Tasks•Attributes•Metrics
•Gaps•Shortfalls•Redundancies•Risk areas
• Non-materiel solutions
• Materiel solutions• S+T initiatives• Experimentation
Capabilities Definition
OSD (AT&L)
COCOMs
USMCArmy
Navy
Air Force
DIA
OSD (NII)
OSD (PA&E)
FCB
Capabilities Based AssessmentCapabilities Based Assessment
OSD (AT&L)- led Capability Roadmaps
• LRIP• IOT&E
ConceptDecision
ServicesServices
• FOT&E• Deploy-
ment • Sustain-
ment• Disposal
Full RateProd DRMS “B” MS “C”MS “A”
Technology Development
System Development Producti
onCDD
CPD
Technology Development
System Development Producti
onCDD
CPD
Analysis of Alternatives
Technology Development
System Development ProductionCDD CPD
Functional Area Analysis
Functional Needs Analysis
Functional Solutions Analysis
Capability Based Assessment
Develop Concept ICD
Acquisition and Test
OSD (AT&L, PA&E), Services and OSD (DOT&E), Joint Staff (JROC)
Concept Refinement Opns & Spt
Capability Area Reviews (CARs)
“as is” Roadmaps
SecDef
Strategic Planning Guidance
Strategy
OSD/JCSOSD/JCS
•Strategic Planning Guidance
•Defense Planning Scenarios
•Family of Concepts
•Transformation
Joint Concepts
Joint Requirements Oversight Council
COCOMCOCOM
Incremental Development
Joint Staff / OSD
O&S
5Systems EngineeringSystems Engineering
Systems and Mission IntegrationSystems and Mission Integration Systems AcquisitionSystems Acquisition
Acquisition Engagement
Planning, Programming, Budgeting and Execution
MS “B” MS “C”MS “A”
IncrementalDevelopment
Technology Development
System Development Productio
nCDD
CPD
Technology Development
System Development Productio
nCDD
CPD
Analysis of Alternatives
Technology Development
System Development ProductionCDD CPD
Functional Area Analysis
Functional Needs Analysis
Functional Solutions Analysis
Strategic Planning Guidance
Joint Concepts
COCOMCOCOM
ICD
ConceptDecision
OSD/JCSOSD/JCS
Capabilities Based AssessmentCapabilities Based Assessment
Capability Area Reviews (CARs)Capability Area Reviews (CARs)
OSD (AT&
L)
COCOMs
USMCArmy
Navy
Air Forc
eDIA
OSD (NII)
OSD (PA&E)
FCB
Support Capability Based Assessments
(FAA, FNA, FSA)Define Relationships with
Related Capabilities, Architectures (e.g., GIG)
Identify alternatives; Trade cost, sched, perf
Identify incremental, system specifications
Determine system performance parameters
and verification plans
Develop, Test, and AssessIncrements of Capability
Demonstrate capabilities meet user needs
Assess system performance against
capability needs
Assess portfolio performance (CAR)
Integrate SoS; Assess Cost, Sched, Perf
Integrate and Test
CapabilityBased
Acquisition
ComponentsComponents
EnterpriseEnterprise
SoSSoS
SystemSystem
OperationalOperational
Full RateProd DR
O&S
6
Key Activity: Capability Area Reviews
USD(AT&L), as DAE, leads reviews of select capability areas to:
• Provide mission area context – from a top-down perspective• Implement capability-based methodology on provider side• Link policy, capability generation, acquisition, and budget
processes• Identify joint solutions and added work to be done (across
DOTMLPF)• Reveal need for management, engineering, and testing across an
area• Help align individual program expectations • Provide basis to set metrics and gauge progress over time• Assess the cumulative effect of individual program decisions
But…wide participation is essential
7
Key Activity: Roadmaps and Roadmapping
Roadmaps provide a framework for decision making –prompt discussion, inform decisions, and capture decisions made
• Lay out Department’s strategic plan considering:- Materiel and non-materiel solutions- Capability that only exists at Family/System-of-Systems level- What to expect from each system- Cross-cutting management, engineering, and testing- Network enablers- Affordability
• Nature of Roadmaps will vary by topic• Start with the “as is” and show where we want to go
But… must balance decisions across capability areas
8
Air Complementary Platforms:AH-64UH-60CH-47A2C2S
Ground Complementary PlatformsLand WarriorM-1 TankM-2 BradleyFire SupportStrykerFCS
Key Activity: System Decisions in Context
Replacing:OH-58D
Weapons: .50 cal/7.62 mm Guns 2.75” Rockets Hellfire
ISR: JSTARS AWACS GPS AMPS ABCS DCGS-A GCSSA
Supporting Platforms: C-17A C-130(J)
C-5
Hosting Platforms LHA/D
Net Centric Warfare: IDM BFT Have Quick SATCOM SINCGARS JTRS (Cluster 1) Link-16 (w/JTRS)
Arrow to ARH denotes receiving other program’s technology or capabilityArrow from ARH denotes technology or capability recipients from ARH
SOLID DENOTES CURRENT SYSTEMDASH DENOTES FUTURE SYSTEM
Capability Area: FORCE APPLICATIONRoadmaps: Army Aviation Modernization PlanMOSA Rating: SatisfactoryPerformance issues with interface
Current schedule and performance support fielding
Performance and schedule coordination required for future systems
OSD DAES Rating: C S P Not Rated Fielded(Service rating *)
Armed Reconnaissance Helicopter
9
System-of-Systems (SoS) Systems Acquisition Functions
• Align expectations of AT&L, the Joint Staff and the Services for joint capability to be fielded over time (requirements, etc)
• Synchronize efforts/programs across the Services to produce the desired capabilities (e.g., development activities, testing)
• Conduct systems engineering and integration across Service and joint programs to ensure interoperability
• Develop and execute properly phased and focused test and evaluation plans for SoS components and overall joint capability
• Establish mechanism for allocating resources among component programs and activities – including making needed tradeoffs
• Coordinate activities in all the DOTMLPF areas, to create the enablers associated with fielding a capability in packages (hardware, software, training, spares, etc.)
• Sustain capability over time
10
SoS Example: Integrated Air and Missile Defense Challenges
2010 Joint Engagement Zone Single Integrated Air Picture Combat ID Integrated Fire Control Automated Battle Management Aids
11
As of 1 Apr 04
FY 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
Sensors:JLENSE -2AEGISMRRSE -3E -8E -10MP -RTIP
Weapons:PAC -3 (PATRIOT)MEADSSLAMRAAMF/A -18F -35ERAM/SM6CLAWSF -15F -16F/A -22AIM -120
Battle Management:AMDC2CAC2SAOC
Networks/C2:CECJTRSMIDST -SATGIG -BEDoD TeleportNCES
Critical Asset Defense
Limited Area Defense
Theater Area Defense
(AWACS 30/35 - 40/45)
(JSTARS)
(MIDS)
(Suite 5M)
(C -7)
(F/A -18)
(Block 1)
9/30 9/16
4/30
12/1
8/15 9/30
12/10 9/13
A/C #16Delivered
3/31
MS B DU#16/1
9/30
CDR2/1
9/30
1/1
4/30MC
8/30
12/15
9/30
12/1
FUE6/1
9/30
6/1
3/25 5/30
10/1
9/1
4 th
Qtr4 th
Qtr
1/19/15Cluster 2
8/1 10/3Cluster 3 & 4Cluster 2FUE
Cluster 5 FUE
12/1
10/30 10/1
9/30
9/30
1/1
MS B
MS B7/1
MS C 2/11 st a/c
10/30
AWACS 30/359/30
PDB 69/30
9/30
(40/42)
8/1
AWACS 30/35(GATORS Inc 1)
6/30MS C
9/30FUE
4/30AF
4/15USN
LegendIOC –FOC –Other Key Dates –SIAP Blk 0 Implementation –IFF Mode 5 Implementation –Development Timeline –Kill Chain Ellipse –
LegendIOC –FOC –Other Key Dates –SIAP Blk 0 Implementation –IFF Mode 5 Implementation –Development Timeline –Kill Chain Ellipse –
Notional - for Illu
strative Purposes
*Version 1
Sys
tem
sC
apab
ilitie
sSoS Example: Integrated Air and Missile Defense Roadmap
12
Current Challenges
• Plan for a budget constrained environment and impact on potential solutions – new vs. re-engineered vs. DOTMLPF
• System complexity and interdependency is increasing – Family of Systems and System of Systems interdependencies
• Balancing joint needs with cost and schedule • Demand for network centric capability drives higher levels of
program coordination• Development of capabilities that do not fit well in current
management structures• Effective application of systems engineering to streamline
acquisition process and meet performance objectives• Maintaining an expert workforce, trained for the above
challenges