document title goes here, department of veterans affairs
TRANSCRIPT
VHA Directive:
National Pain Management Strategy
Courtesy of C. Buckenmaier, MD
The Beginning: Battlefield trauma
THE END
CRPS in artist: Injury Vietnam
Courtesy of N. Wiedemer, CRNP
Pain Hurts
Pain affects the whole person
What is pain? THE END
CRPS in artist: Injury Vietnam
Mismanaged chronic pain is often a
personal, biopsychosocial catastrophe!
….and is a huge public health problem.
• Quality of life
– Physical functioning
– Ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs)
– Work
• Social consequences
– Marital/family relations
– Intimacy/sexual activity
– Social role and friendships
• Psychological / CNS
morbidity
– Fear, anger, suffering
– Sleep disorders
– Loss of self-esteem
• Medical comorbidites &
consequences
– Accidents
– Medication effects
– Immune function
– Clinical depression
– Neuroplasticity to pain disease
• Societal consequences- Health care costs
- Disability
- Lost workdays
- Business failures
- Higher taxes
Established (by research) effects of chronic pain
Beginning to End: The Chronic Pain Cycle Pathology:-Muscle atrophy,
weakness;
-Bone loss;
-Immunocomprimise
-Depression / Suicide
Less active
Kinesophobia
Decreased
motivation
Increased
isolation
Role loss
Disability
Pathophysiology of Maintenance:-Radiculopathy
-Neuroma traction
-Myofascial sensitization
-Brain, SC pathology (atrophy, reorganization)
Psychopathology
of maintenance:-Encoded anxiety
dysregulation
- PTSD
-Emotional
allodynia
-Mood disorder Neurogenic
Inflammation:- Glial activation
- Pro-inflammatory
cytokines
- blood-nerve barrier
dysruption
Acute injury
and pain
Peripheral
Sensitization:New Na+ channels
cause lower
threshold
Central
Sensitization-Neuroplastic
changes
Gallagher RM, in Ebert & Kerns, 2010)
If chronic pain is often a personal catastrophe and
is a huge public cost,
how do you deliver clinical care that is driven by
performance based, biopsychosocial outcomes?
1) Start by understanding:
- the causal models of disease
- the mechanisms underlying these models
- the biopsychosocial formulation of these models for each
unique disease population
- the evidence basis for treatment
2) Then develop chronic disease management programs:
- address salient biopsychosocial factors for each disease
population (e.g., low back pain, headache, fibromyalgia)
- guide formulating each individual patient’s chronic pain
- develop a goal-oriented management plan for each patient
How do we deliver clinical care driven by
performance based, biopsychosocial outcomes?
1) Apply evidence-based treatment approaches at a level appropriate to your clinical setting (primary care, pain medicine).
2) Apply chronic disease management principles in a community by utilizing clinical skills cost effectively in a performance based, integrated treatment network that:
- Reduces risk for complications and chronicity
- Relies on a sustainable patient /provider / community
network of support and responsibility
Self-care - meditation
- exercise
- web-training
- social modeling
-social supports
Primary care-Mech. Based Drug Algorithms
-Stepped Behavioral Care
-Physical Therapy
-Office procedures
-CAM
Secondary care: Pain Medicine - Biopsychosocial assessment
** pain generators, mechanisms
** perpetuating factors
- - - peripheral, CNS, psychosocial
- Biopsychosocial Formulation
Tertiary care: PM Subspecialties - Neuroremodeling
- Gene therapies
- Neurostimulation
- Rehabilitation Centers
POPULATION OF PATIENTS IN PAIN
Relative proportion of
pain care, by setting
Primary Care
Specialty, Primary /
secondary prevention
Secondary Care
Specialty, Subspecialty,
Secondary / tertiary
prevention
PAIN
SPECIALTY
-Practice
-Training
- Research
Tertiary Care
Subspecialty, tertiary
prevention
Evidence-based Continuum of Care
Self Care, Community
CarePrimary/secondary
Prevention
Disease Management
(Dubois , Gallagher,
Lippe Pain Med 2009
REQUIRES COMPETENCY
• System competency
– Redesign elements of system to support :
• Case recognition
• Early, evidence-based, integrated intervention
• Adequate workforce numbers, organization and
rewards
• Data based, continuous quality improvement
• Clinician competency
– Adequate training at all levels:
• primary care, pain medicine, rehabilitation
– Integrated teams for disease management
– Continuing education, monitored outcomes
RESEARCH CHALLENGES
Developing causal illness models: Epidemiology research
Developing cost-effective interventions :
Observational studies
Clinical efficacy trials
Comparator studies
Establishing clinical cost-effectiveness
Observational studies
Health services research
VHA Pain Management Strategy
• To develop a comprehensive, integrated
system-wide approach to pain
management.
• To reduce pain and suffering, and improve
quality of life for veterans suffering acute
and chronic pain.
• Stepped Care Model: continuum of
treatment from acute pain to longitundial
management of chronic pain.
Electronic transfer of
information from military to VA
VA screening to identify risk level and needs
Moderate to severe risk
Immediate engagement
and interventionRoutine Scheduling
Minimal risk
Restoration: pain control; community network; physical and
psychosocial function
Pain medicine
clinic consultation
Core primary care pain
management team: PCP,
behavioral medicine, mental
health, social work
Primary
care visit
Pain medicine
specialty
treatment
Continuum of stepped care
PC Stepped
Programs:
- pain school
- pain coping skills
(CBT) groups,
- opioid renewal
clinic
Mental Health
Specialty Programs
Pain and P3 Rehabilitation Programs
1
2
3
Steps
CHALLENGES
TRANSFER OF CLINICAL INFORMATION
TO VHA
- Diagnosis
- History of Pain Condition
- Nature and circumstances of injury
- Co-morbidities
- Prior Treatment
- Adequacy of trial
- Effectiveness
Stepped Care Model: The Steps
Step One: Primary Care
Must develop competent primary care workforce.
Requires availability of system supports:
Family and patient education programs
Collaboration with integrative mental health primary care teams.
Post deployment programs.
HEALTH SERVICES CHALLENGES
Developing adequate workforce:
Primary Care
• Competency through training redesign
• Biopsychosocial pain management
• Integrated teams
• Chronic disease management interventions (e.g.,
Dobscha et al JAMA 2009; Kroenke et al JAMA 2009)
• Re-design RVUs to reward competent longitudinal
care
• Provide systems support for chronic disease
management.
Primary Care
1. Routine screening, assessment,
management, reassessment
Primary Care Competencies
1. Conduct of comprehensive pain assessment
2. Negotiating behaviorally specific and feasible goals
3. Knowledge/use of common metrics for measuring function
4. Optimal patient communication
1. How to provide reassurance
2. How to foster pain self-management
Primary Care Competencies
5. Conduct of routine physical/neurological examinations
6. Judicious use of diagnostic tests/procedures and secondary consultation
7. Assessment of psychiatric/behavioral comorbidities
8. Knowledge of accepted clinical practice guidelines
9. Rational, algorithmic based polypharmacy
10. Opioid management
Numerical Rating Scale:
Monitoring Patient Progress
• Improvement can be monitored
• Gives clinician and patient a consistent
understandable measure with intra-rater
reliability that facilitates discussion regarding:
changes in pain, response to treatment
• Reduction of 2 points represents a clinically
important
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10No pain Worst possible
pain
Adapted from Farrar JT et al. Pain. 2001;94:149-158.
SevereCan’t
function
Excruciating, ER time
ModerateBothersome
Mild, in backgroundJust
Noticeable
Intolerable,
Recognizing Neuropathic Pain
• Persistent burning sensation
• Paroxysmal lancinating pains
• Paresthesias
• Dysesthesias
• Hyperalgesias
• Allodynias
Common signs and symptoms
Galer BS. Neurology. 1995;45(suppl 9):S17-S25; Backonja M-M et al. Neurol Clin.
1998;16:775-789.
Pain Drawing & Neuropathy Types
Boulton AJM et al. Med Clin North Am. 1998;82:909-929; Portenoy RK. Pain Management: Theory and
Practice. 1996:108-113; Katz N. Clin J Pain. 2000;16:S41-S48
Nociceptivepain
Neuropathicpain
Pain condition +depression
Secondary sleepdisturbance
Secondary depression Primary D.
Short-termNSAIDs,
Cox-II (?),opioids
Persists afteradequateanalgesia
Persists afteradequateanalgesia
Evaluate risks
Evaluate risks
Antihistamine,zolpidem,low-dose
benzodiazepine
Trazodone
Low-doseTCA
Lidocaine patch;gabapentin & other AED (Ca+ & Na+
channels); alpha 2 agonists (tizanidine,
clonidine);opioids
Titrate TCAs (Na+ channels and SNRI) : desipramine,
nortriptyline,
SSRI trial
Evaluate risks
SNRIs: venlafaxine, duloxetine
Algorithm for Medication Selection in Chronic Pain
with and without Co-Morbid Depression
Gallagher RM, Verma S. Semin Clin Neurosurgery. 2004This information concerns uses that have not been approved by the US FDA.
Evaluate risks
Opioid Renewal Clinic: A risk management
approach to aberrant behavior in primary care
Wiedemer, et al. Pain Med. 2007;8:573-584.
Negative
UDT
4%
Self-discharged
38%
Referred
13%
Resolved
45%
Aberrant
Behavior
51%
At risk, No
Aberrant
Behavior
49%
ONE YEAR
OUTCOMES,
ABERRANT
BEHAVIOR
N = 171TOTAL REFERRED
Stepped Care Model: The Steps
• Step Two: Secondary Consultation and
collaborative care
• Requires collaboration with community supports and
societal resources (e.g., voc rehab, college education,
etc)
• Requires timely access to competent specialty
consultation / collaboration from:
• Pain medicine and palliative care
• Physical medicine and rehabilitation
• Polytrauma programs, mental health and pain psychology
• Inpatient pain medicine consultations
HEALTH SERVICES CHALLENGES
Developing adequate workforce:
Pain Medicine
• Competency through training redesign• Lengthen and strengthen pain medicine training to establish
standardized skills: 2 year fellowships, residencies (Dubois,
Gallagher, Lippe. Pain Med 2009 10(6)
• Biopsychosocial medicine
• Integrated, interdisciplinary teams
• Chronic disease management / collaborative care
• Re-design RVUs to reward competent
longitudinal care not just procedures
Stepped Care Model: The Steps
• Step Three: Tertiary, Interdisciplinary
Care
–Requires advanced pain medicine
diagnostics and interventions.
–Requires Pain Rehabilitation Facilities
(CARF) for severity / complexity
–Requires collaboration with community
supports and societal resources (e.g.,
voc rehab, college education, etc)
Clinical Competence and Expertise in Pain
Management
• Initial and ongoing education and training of all
clinical staff on principles of pain assessment
and management
– Clearly delineated, specific pain management
responsibilities of each clinician
– Relevant education and training
• VHA standards for pain management will be
communicated by training faculty to all clinical
trainees: medical students and residents, allied
health professional students and interns.
VHA National Pain Management Program Office
• Coordinate system-wide implementation of
the Strategy at facility- and VISN-levels.
• Coordinate system-wide performance
improvement plan.
• Coordinate development and
dissemination of treatment protocols for
pain management.
VHA National Pain Management Program Office
• Identifying pain management expertise and
resources at facilities and VISNs.
• Assuring timely and appropriate access to
pain management services for veterans.
• Collaborating with relevant program offices
to develop, implement, and disseminate
education and training tools to assist
clinicians in acquiring necessary skills.
• Collaborating with:
– Office of R&D - To identify pain research
opportunities, and facilitate collaborative research
efforts.
– Office of Academic Affiliations – To assess
current state of pain management education in
health professional training programs and
develop enhancing educational interventions.
• Establishing plan for internal and external
communications of the Strategy.
VHA National Pain Management Program Office
VHA National Pain Management
Strategy Coordinating Committee
• A multi-disciplinary committee to support
the National Pain Management Program
Office in meeting responsibilities.
• Comprised of representatives from key
clinical disciplines.
• Includes representatives from other VHA
offices.
Veteran Integrated Service Network
(VISN ) Director
• VISN Director is responsible for:
– All facilities in VISN carrying out current pain
management policies.
– Appointing a pain management POC to
support at VISN level.
– Assuring tertiary inter-disciplinary pain care
services on VISN level.
– Evaluating implementation of the Strategy
according to NPMPO-established
performance measures.
Facility Director
• Facility Director is responsible for:
–Ensuring that objectives of strategy are
met
–Fully implementing Stepped Care Model
–Assuring that standards of pain care are
met, including standards for early pain
recognition, assessment, and treatment
Evaluation of Outcomes and Quality of
Pain Management
• Multidisciplinary pain management committee
must be established at each VHA facility:
– To provide oversight, coordination, and monitoring of
pain management activities and processes to ensure
compliance with standards
• Quality of pain assessments and effectiveness
of pain management must be monitored.
CHALLENGES in the System
• Establishing importance of mission
– WRISC data
– Observational and clinical studies
• Evaluating operational steps of implementation
– Establish baseline resources: Haig survey completed
with 100% participation
• Getting buy-in at VISN level
– Population-based approach: shared responsibility
• Getting buy-in at Facility level
– Change attitudes: primary focus vs “step-child”
– Change procedures: product line vs. fragmented
approach
VISN and Facility Models