document resume ed 405 983 ps 025 171 title institution ... · document resume ed 405 983 ps 025...

DOCUMENT RESUME

ED 405 983 PS 025 171

TITLE South Dakota 1996 KIDS COUNT Factbook: Key IndicatorsofChild Well-Being.

INSTITUTION Kids Count--South Dakota, Vermillion.SPONS AGENCY Annie E. Casey Foundation, Baltimore, MD.PUB DATE Dec 96NOTE 175p.; For 1995 Factbook, see ED 397 972.PUB TYPE Statistical Data (110) Reports Descriptive (141)

EDRS PRICE MF01/PC07 Plus Postage.DESCRIPTORS Adolescents; Child Health; *Children; *Child Welfare;

Dropout Rate; Early Parenthood; Family Income;Mortality Rate; *Social Indicators; State Surveys;Statistical Surveys; *Trend Analysis; *Well Being

IDENTIFIERS *Indicators; *South Dakota; Wellness

ABSTRACTThis KIDS COUNT statistical report is the fourth to

examine trends in children's and adolescents' well-being in SouthDakota using indicators of health, education, social, and economicwell-being, along with information on family income, householdrelationships, population, and AFDC/food stamp usage for each county.The information is organized in the following seven chapters: (1)"Key Demographic Indicators," including information on South Dakotapopulation, family profiles, and a map of counties; (2) "Key HealthIndicators," detailing infant mortality rate, child death rate, lowbirth weight babies, prenatal care, vaccinations, teen violentdeaths, and births to single teens; (3) "Key Educational Indicators,"including dropout rates, enrollment figures, and disability data; (4)

"Key Economic Indicators," including per capita income, females inthe work force, AFDC and food stamp use, child care use andavailability, and poverty statistics; (5) "Key Safety Indicators,"focusing on youth traffic accidents, juvenile justice, juvenile drugand alcohol use, and child abuse and neglect statistics; (6) "Stateand County Data Tables," a county-by-county detailing of the keyindicators of well-being; and (7) "Sources and Definitions."(KDFS)

***********************************************************************

Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be madefrom the original document.

***********************************************************************

\

C jfflgilli)Cr)00

kr)cp

ds

Key Indicafors or Child Well-BeingFunded by the Annie E. Casey Foundation

/

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATIONOffice of Educational Research and improvement

EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATIONCENTER (ERIC)

**ATMs document has been reproduced asreceived from the person or organizationoriginating it

0 Minor changes have been made to Improvereproduction quality.

Points 01 view or opinions stated in this docu-ment do not necessarily represent officialOERI position or policy.

PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE ANDDISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL

HAS B EN GRANTED BY

CO.:C"t) R.C oc..\(% ro.se\

TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCESINFORMATION CENTER (ERIC)

fIrlEW MIMI Atli C

4it

rinkidscount

STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTAWILLIAM J. JANKLOW, GOVERNOR

December 1996

Dear Friends of South Dakota Children:

This is the fourth annual South Dakota KIDS COUNT Factbook. Since 1993, theKIDS COUNT Project has been measuring, with the best indicators available, child well-being in South Dakota and in all its 66 counties. The Factbook organizes reliable dataon the condition of youth and present statistics in a way that will allow South Dakotans tounderstand our children's needs better.

The facts and figures in this book aid people in the state who are collaborating in localcommunities to help children grow up safe and healthy. Through data based planning andproblem-solving initiatives, community leaders, child advocates, public policy makers at alllevels, academicians, business leaders, and the general public can move beyond rhetoric topriorities of time and resources.

I, again, thank the South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project, the various state agenciesinvolved in providing data, and the Annie E. Casey Foundation for making thispublication possible.

Sincerely,

Wil:ddh

3

EXECUTIVE OFFICE

STATE CAPITOL500 EAST CAPITOL

PIERRE, SOUTH DAKOTA57501-5070

605-773-3212

Soufh Dakota 1996 KIDS COUNT Facitook

Table of Contents

Introduction 1

Key Demographic Indicators 3

Key Health Indicators 7

Key Educational Indicators 15

Key Economic Indicators 19

Key Safety Indicators 25

State and County Data Tables 31

Sources and Definitions 167

rrnkidscount 4

Sod!) Dakoia KIDS COUNT Projeci

Advisory CommitteeDe Vee Dykstra Business Research BureauHalley Lee Attorney General's OfficeBetty Oldenkamp Department of Human ServicesTim Koehn Department of Human ServicesSusan Ryan Department of Education and Cultural AffairsSharon Sonnenschein Department of Social ServicesRich Jensen Department of Social ServicesJay Newberger Unified Judicial SystemKris Graham Office of the GovernorLloyd Schipper Department of LaborSally Van Den Berg Department of Health

1.1.16.014.

Factbook Design and LayoutCarole Cochran Data Coordinator, KIDS COUNT Project

PhotographsTimothy Shumaker CoverMelanie Nelsen page 3Mary Bartels page 7Darlene Bottolfson page 15De Vee Dykstra page 19Mary Bartels page 25Nancy Nelson page 31Gregory Huff, Institute of American Indian Studies, USD..page 167

Copyright 1996 University of South Dakota. Permission toreproduce from this Factbook is granted provided South Dakota

KIDS COUNT is cited as the source. Photographs andillustrations are copyrighted and may not be reproduced

without permission.

'11.. ,V*6ip.1

Infroduclion

The South Dakota KIDS COUNT project began in January of 1993 with a$400,000 grant from the Annie E. Casey Foundation and is administered bythe State Data Center of South Dakota. The project is part of a nationalprogram designed to promote accountability of children through anationwide profile of their condition. The goal is to improve the collection ofnational, state, and local data on the well-being of children in a way thatincreases awareness of their situation and provides the means to addresstheir needs. KIDS COUNT uses this data to encourage the private and publicsectors to target specific problems and groups of children for programmingand fund raising efforts.

There are KIDS COUNT Projects in all 50 states. Each state produces theirown Factbook containing county level data. In addition, the national KIDSCOUNT organization produces a national Databook, containing state leveldata only, which allows the user to compare the states on various keyindicators of child well-being. These indicators are

Low Birth Weight BabiesInfant Mortality Rates

Child Death RatesTeen Violent Death Rates

Births to Single TeensJuvenile Custody RatesSchool Drop-Out Rates

Poverty StatisticsDemographic DataDisability Statistics

South Dakota KIDS COUNT will be tracking children in our state using theabove indicators and information on family income, household relationships,population, and AFDC/Foodstamp usage for each county. The Factbook alsocontains data on youth related traffic accidents, age-appropriateimmunization levels, and child abuse and neglect statistics.

The Factbook provides a comprehensive look at the children in our state andshould be an important tool in assessing the well-being of South Dakota'schildren and their families.

6

Acknowledgements

The staff at the South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project gratefully acknowledges the financialsupport of the Annie E. Casey Foundation.

This Factbook is the fourth annual county-by-county look at the status of South Dakota'schildren. As always, it is a collaborative work with the state agencies who provide the data,the State Data Center, and the Business Research Bureau, School of Business, University ofSouth Dakota.

Thanks goes to the following indivivals and organizations who helped make this Factbook areality: Bob Collet, Brian Singleton, Darlene Bottolfson, De Vee Dykstra, Institute of AmericanIndian Studies, USD, Janna Dosch, Jay Newberger, Jennifer Tracy, Lisa Kaiser,Mark Gildemaster, Mary Bartels, Melanie Nelsen, Merlin Weyer, Michelle Gisi,Nancy Kniffen Craig, Nancy Nelson, Patty Thompson, Rich Jensen, Sally Van Den Berg,Teresa Haven, Theresa Bendert, and Tracie Ambur.

It is the hope of the South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project that the information contained inthis Factbook will assist local communities, policy makers at all levels of state government,and the print and broadcast media in the development of more cost effective programs andthe continuation of those programs that help kids grow up safe and healthy.

We welcome your comments and suggestions. You can reach us the following ways:

Phone: 605-677-5287

Fax: 605-677-5427

E-Mail: [email protected]

Internet: www.brb.usd.edu {then select Kids Count}

Address: South Dakota KIDS COUNT ProjectState Data CenterUniversity of South Dakota414 East Clark Street Patterson Hall Rm. 118Vermillion, SD 57069

>Popo Igloo Sialisfics

>Family Profiles

, y

Key

Demographic

Indicafors

\\ .1

South Dakota population l+++-"GO'The Bureau of the Census recently released population estimates for 1994. South Dakota had atotal population of 723,655 compared to the 1990 Census figure of 696,004. Children under fivemade up 7.5% of the population of South Dakota in 1994. Individuals under the age of 20 made up31.9% of the total population in 1994, up slightly from 31.5% in 1990. Of the children under 20years of age, 49% were female and 51% were male in 1994

Total Persons and Persons Under 20

1994 1990Change 90-94

NumberAge

Under 5 54,301 54,504 -203 -.3Ages 5-9 57,601 58,795 -1,194 -2.0Ages 10-14 62,213 55,437 6,776 12.2Ages 15-19 56,524 50,571 5,953 11.8

Under 20 230,639 219,307 11,332 5.2

Total Population 723,655 696,004 27,651 3.9

Persons under 20 by Race

Change 90-94

Race1994 1990 Number

White 199,702 190,559 9,143 4.8Native American/Eskimo/Aleut 27,889 25,469 2,420 9.5Black 1,435 1,365 70 5.1Asian/Pac. Islander 1,613 1,248 365 29.2Other NA* 666Hispanic** 3,068 2,548 520 20.4

*There was no "other" category available in the 1994 estimates**Hispanics are also included in the other race groups

Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census, Estimates of Population by Age, Sex and Race/Hispanic Origin and the State Data Center

South Dakota KIDS COUNT Proieci

04;0w Family Profile

According to the 1990 Census of Population and Housing therewere 180,306 family households in South Dakota, 84.6% ofwhich were married couple families. Nationally a little overthree-quarters of the families were married couple families(78.6%). Of the family households, 42% were married couplefamilies with children, 2.2% were male householder familieswith children with no wife present, and 8.4% of the familieswere female householder familieswith children with nohusband present.

In the 1980 Census there were fewer families (178,756) but a higher percentage of them were mar-ried couple families (87.7% compared to 84.6% in 1990). Predictably then, growth was seen in thenumber of single male headed families and single female headed families between the 1980 and the1990 Censuses. (From 9.3% to 11.5% for all female headed families and 3.0% to 3.9% for all maleheaded families.)

1990Family Households

Married couple families

WhiteNative

AmericanOtherRaces Total

with children 71,469 3,462 867 75,798

Married couple familieswithout children 75,426 965 330 76,721

Female headed familieswith children 11,432 3,592 167 15,191

Female headed familieswithout children 4,974 515 31 5,520

Male headed familieswith children 2,981 887 59 3,927

Male headed familieswithout children 2,871 257 21 3,149

TOTAL 169,153 9,678 1,475 180,306

South Dakoia KIDS COUNT Proieci

440-rwr. South Dakola Couniy Map TH-03

BEST COPY AVAiLABLE 1i

South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project

>Infant Mortality Rafe

>Child Death Rate

>Low Birth Weight

>Teen Violent Death Rafe

>Births to Single Teens

>Prenatal Care

>Vaccination Rates

Key

Healfh

Indicalors

/ / \

'

\\s

Nmaj

ma

igisier Now To Inferpref Ifh Daft

Information and Limitations of thehealth data:Mortality and death rates are calculated bytaking the number of deaths in any givencategory, dividing it by the total number ofindividuals in that category, and multiplyingby 1,000 or 100,000 or whatever numberyou choose.

Total death X 1,000Population Base

A percentage is basically the same for-mula, multiplied by 100.

As the population base becomes smaller,as it does in many counties in SouthDakota, statistical variation becomes moreprominent and more prone to anomalies.For example, let's say a county has 2children die out of a population base of 75.If we divide 2 by 75 and multiply by 1,000we get a child death rate of 26 per 1,000.If the next year only 1 infant dies out of 75,the infant mortality rate would be 13. Thisso-called large decrease is a result ofstatistical variation, and the magnitude ofthe drop is exaggerated because of theuse of a base of 1,000.

To attempt to minimize chance variations,we use 5 year averages. Information in thissection of the Factbook are for the 5 yearsof 1991 through 1995. Despite theseprecautions, in the most sparsely popu-lated counties using 5 year averages willstill not reduce chance variation signifi-cantly for some of the indicators due to thesmall number of events.

The standard error (SE) of a rate is used inhealth statistics when studying or compar-ing rates. The SE defines a rate's variabilityand can be used to calculate a confidence

interval (CI) to determine the actual variance ofa rate 95% of the time. Rates for two differentpopulations are considered to be significantlydifferent when their confidence intervals do notoverlap.

The standard error and confidence intervals arecalculated in the following manner. Forexample, the Brown county low birth weight is4.7%. This was based on 109 low birth weightbirths from 1991 through 1995. The square rootof 109 is roughly 10.4. By dividing the rate of4.7 by 10.4, the estimated SE of approximately0.45 is obtained. The estimated SE can then beused to compute a 95% CI for the rate. Thestandard formula for determining the 95% CI ofa rate is:

Rate ± (1.96 * SE)

Following this formula, we produce an equationof 4.7 ± (1.96 * 0.45) and the result is4.7 ± 0.9. From this we can calculate theestimated 95% CI to be from 3.8% to 5.6%. Itcan then be stated, with 95% certainty, that theactual 1991-95 low birth weight rate for BrownCounty is between 3.8% and 5.6%.

Therefore, Brown County's low birth weight ratewould not be considered significantly differentfrom the state rate. This is because theconfidence intervals for Brown County (3.8- 5.6)and the state (5.3 - 5.7) overlap. Conversely,Pennington County's low birth weight rate isconsidered significantly different from the staterate because their respective confidenceintervals (6.2 7.4 and 5.3 5.7) do not overlap.

Vital Statistics were provided by the South Dakota Depart-ment of Health, Office of Health Data and Evaluation.

13 South Dakota KIDS COUNT Proied

Iniani Mortality Rafe 71'03The five year average infant mortality rate for1991 through 1995 in South Dakota stood at9.4 per 1,000 live births; or for every 1,000live births there were 9.4 infant deaths. Thistranslates to 506 infant deaths over a fiveyear period.

There has been a slight decline in the rateand number of infant deaths from the 1988through 1992 time period to the current timeperiod. The table at the right indicates thenumber and rate of infant deaths.

Infant mortality rates differed by race. Of the506 infant deaths, 344 were White, 155 wereNative American, 4 were Other races, and 3occurred where race was unknown. Ratesare as follows:

'White 7. 74 per 1,000 live births'Native American 18.85 per 1,000 live births'Other 4.54 per 1,000 live births

Infant Mortality Rates forFive Year Intervals

Rate1991-95 9.4 506

1990-94 9.6 518

1989-93 9.6 524

1988-92 9.7 534

Child Death Rafe

The child death rate for 1991 1995 was 29.3deaths per 100,000 youth age one throughfourteen for a total of 232 deaths.

Of the 232 deaths, 174 were White children,55 were Native American children, and 4 wereOther races. The child death rates by raceare:

White 25.24 per 100,000 childrenNative American 58.10 per 100,000 children'Other 34.20 per 100,000 children

Over the last four 5-year periods there hasbeen a decline in the child death rate eachperiod. The table at the right gives trend datafor this indicator.

Oa' '',144rfno.-1747':'4774,47t:-:,


Child Death Ratesfor Five Year Intervals

Rate1991-95 29.3 232

1990-94 32.2 256

1989-93 32.9 262

1988-92 33.4 266

Low Birfh Weigh* BabiesThe percent of all live births that were low birthweight babies was 5.5 during 1991 -1995. Thismeans that for every 100 live births, 5.5 were lowbirth weight babies (babies weighing less than 5pounds, 9 ounces).

Unlike infant mortality and child death rates, thepercentage of low birth weight babies shows a slightincrease over the last four 5-year time periods. While5.0% of the babies were born at low birth weight from1988-92, 5.5% were born low birth weight from1991-95.

Of the babies born with low birth weight from 91-95,2,363 were White, 518 were Native American, 60were of Other races, and there were 8 cases wherethe race was unknown. Low birth weight babies byrace:

White 5.3%'Native American 6.3%Other 6.8%

' tge

Percent Low Birth Weight Babiesfor Five Year Intervals

Percent #1991-95 5.5% 2,949

1990-94 5.4% 2,923

1989-93 5.3% 2,901

1988-92 5.0% 2,841

c61fr Teen Violenf Deal) Rafe_

The teen violent death rate for 1991-95 was 84.6 per100,000 youth fifteen through nineteen years of age.This means that for every 100,000 youth in that agegroup, 84.6 died from accidents, suicides, or homi-cides. Traditionally in South Dakota accidents havemade up the highest percentage of violent deaths.

This indicator has decreased from the 1988-92 timeperiod, from 89.4 to the current 84.6 The actualnumber of deaths has declined as well.

Of the teen violent deaths from 1991-95, 149 wereWhite, 63 were Native American, 1 was of anotherrace. The teen violent death rate by race is:

White teensNative American teens'Other teens

66.90 per 100,000238.59 per 100,000

26.70 per 100,000

Teen Violent Death Ratefor Five Year Intervals

Rate1991-95 84.6 213

1990-94 90.2 228

1989-93 87.8 222

1988-92 89.4 226

10 1 `1 Souih Dakota KIDS COUNT Proieci

Birfhs fo Sin* Teens

Birth to single teens made up 8.8% of all births for1991-95. This means that for every 100 births, 8.8occurred to mothers who were under the age of 20 andsingle.

This indicator has shown a gradual steady rise overthe last four 5-year time periods; from 8.0% in 1988-92to the current 8.8%.

Of the babies born to single mothers from 1991-95 (byrace of mother), 2,859 were White, 1,786 were NativeAmerican, 54 were of Other races, and there were 12cases where the race was unknown. Births to singleteens by race:

White 6.4%Native American 21.7%Other 6.1%

Percent Births to Single Teensfor Five Year Intervals

Percent #1991-95 8.8% 4,711

1990-94 8.4% 4,557

1989-93 8.2% 4,469

1988-92 8.0% 4,356

1-4-11!r prenatal Care

The percent of women receiving prenatal care in theirfirst trimester of pregnancy was 80.2% for the timeperiod 1991 through 1995. This means that for every100 pregnancies resulting in a live birth, 80.2 receivedprenatal care during the first three months of thepregnancy.

The percentage of women receiving prenatal care inthe first trimester shows a slight increase over the lastfour 5-year time periods. While 78.0% received carefrom 1988-92, 80.2% did so from 1991-95.

Of the women receiving prenatal care in the firsttrimester from 1991-95, 36,399 were White, 4,946 wereNative American, 643 were of Other races, and therewere 60 cases where the race was unknown. Prenatalcare in the first trimester by race:

WhiteNative American'Other

83.6%61.8%75.1%

Percent Receiving Prenatal Carein 1st Trimester

for Five Year Intervals

Percent1991-95 80.2% 42,048

1990-94 79.5% 42,056

1989-93 78.8% 42,012

1988-92 78.0% 41,956

South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project 11

coaiwr Abe Appropriate ImmunisationsIn November of 1991 the South Dakota Departmentof Health launched an Infant ImmunizationInitiative (1-3) Plan. 1-3 began as a nationwidestrategy brought about by the U.S. measlesepidemic of 1989-91. The goal of 1-3 is to have 90%of the state's two year olds age-appropriatelyimmunized by the year 2000. In June of 1991President Bush selected six sites to pilot new andinnovative approaches to achieving the year 2000goal. South Dakota was selected as the only ruralsite. Since the plan has been in effect there hasbeen a 37.7% increase in South Dakota in thenumber of doses of DTP given to children less thanthe age of two. Age-appropriate immunizationincludes four diptheria, tetanus, pertussis (DTP)immunizations; three oral polio vaccines; and one measles,by the age of two.

Percent Age-Appropriate ImmunizationFor South Dakota

92/93 61.4%

93/94 60.3%

94/95 62.4%

95/96 64.0%

mumps, and rubella (MMR) immunization

The table on the next page gives the percentage of children age-appropriately immunized by countyand school year. Figures are retrospective in that immunization levels are based on the percentageof kindergartners who were adequately immunized at 24 months of age. Results were obtained byexamining records of those entering school to see if they had been appropriately immunized by thetime they were two.

12

Hepatitis BHepatitis B

HaemophilusHaemopholus influenzae type b

DTPDiptheria, Tetanus, Whooping Cough'

Inmumfration Schedule

PolioPolio

MMRMeasles, Mumps, German Measles

Tetanus-Diptheriatetanus, Diptheria

ArAttad,:rito,441.11111N444MP4311.4i:ZA .410,90,...1;4;

() indicates that previously unimmunized adolescents should be immunized.

1'

T,,11',-r so.,


Age Appropriate Immunizafions by County

Two-Year-OldCounty Immunization Level (%)

95-96 94-95 : % change

State 64.0 62.4 2.56Aurora (24) 65.1 66.6 -2.25Beadle (23t) 65.9 57.9 13.82Bennett (46) 54.8 54.0 1.48Bon Homme (36t) 60.8 64.8 -6.17Brookings (23t) 65.9 59.4 10.94Brown (7t) 74.7 72.0 3.75Brule (32) 62.6 65.8 -4.86Buffalo (22t) 66.7 76.4 -12.70Butte (52) 46.7 I 48.1 -2.91Campbell (4t) 78.3 57.9 35.23Charles Mix(45t) 55.4 54.5 1.65Clark (28) 63.8! 45.0 41.78Clay (20) 67.11 63.5 5.67Codington (24t) 65.11 66.6 -2.25Corson (33t) 62.41 78.9 -20.91Custer (50) 47.4 61.4 -22.80Davison (53) 45.7 40.8 12.01Day (21) 67.0 70.3 -4.69Deuel (48) 53.9 45.6 18.20Dewey (7t) 74.71 77.2 -3.24Douglas (9) 73.5 i 63.4 15.93Edmunds (1) 92.01 79.2 16.16Fall River (45t) 55.4 52.2 6.13Faulk (2) 84.0 80.6 4.22Grant (16) 68.1 66.6 2.25Gregory (54) 41.9 41.1 1.95Haakon (51) 47.2 63.2 -25.32Hamlin (13) 70.2 I 58.8 19.39Hand (37) 60.4 45.7 32.17Hanson (19) 67.4 51.3 31.38Harding (12) 70.8 57.3 23.56Hughes (33) 62.4 65.4 -4.59Hutchinson (17) 67.7 66.0 2.58

number in ( ) denotes rank for 95-96, t indicates a tie

CountyTwo-Year-Old

Immunization Level (%)

95-96 94-95 % change

Hyde (56) 40.0 50.0 ; -20.0Jackson (25) 64.5 68.2 -5.43Jerauld (6) 77.4 62.5 23.84Jones (22t) 66.7 52.2 27.78Kingsbury (47) 54.5 57.7 -5.55Lake (38) 60.1 55.7 7.9Lawrence (41) 59.1 63.9 -7.51Lincoln (14) 70.1 66.5 5.41Lyman (34) 61.7 64.5 -4.34McCook (36t) 60.8 56.9 6.85McPherson (3) 82.0 89.7 -8.58Marshall (31) 63.0 76.4 -17.54Meade (39) 60.0 60.9 -1.48Mellete (26) ! 64.3 56.8 13.2Miner (4t) 78.3 78.8 -0.63Minnehaha (30) 63.1 64.8 -2.62Moody (35) 61.6 75.5 -18.41Pennington (27) , 64.0 60.7 5.44Perkins (42) 58.3 64.6 -9.75Potter (40) , 59.5 68.2 -12.76Roberts (8) 74.0 72.5 2.07Sanborn (5) 77.8 71.7 8.51

Shannon (43) 58.2 61.7 -5.67Spink (18) 67.5 68.0 -0.74Stanley (55) 40.8 59.0 -30.85Sully (44t) 56.5 58.3 -0.03Todd (15) 69.3 63.3 9.48Tripp (44t) 56.5 63.3 -10.74Turner (24t) 65.1 57.9 12.44Union (49) 50.9 52.0 -2.12Walworth (10) 73.4 80.6 -8.93Yankton (29) 63.5 61.0 4.10Ziebach (11) 71.4 75.0 -4.8

a

number in ( ) denotes rank for 95-96, t indicates a tie

Source: South Dakota Department of Health, Health and Medical Service.For more information contact Linda Thullner, (605) 773-3737.

atBSIMEISMOWINNWPWORMMIMMsAr'M 59411,10411VAltp-mr


.1.AT

13

14 South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project

4g,

>Dropout Rates

>Enrollment Figures

>Disability Data

c

Key

Educational

Indicafors

WG

20

\'2

4g,

-Enrollmeni Retires

Enrollment figures are gathered every year by theSouth Dakota Department of Education andCultural Affairs on the last Friday of school inSeptember. Figures are for pre-kindergartenthrough twelfth grade.

From 1991 through 1994 there was a steadyincrease in enrollment in South Dakota publicschools. Figures for 1991 were 131,576; for 1994they were 135,494. Fall of 1995 showed adecrease in enrollment, to 134,952 as did Fall of1996, 133,883.

South Dakota's private schools have shown thesame pattern of growth and then decline in theirenrollment figures. In the fall of 1991 there were15,803 students enrolled in private schools in thestate. By the fall of 1994 enrollment had risen to18,503. The enrollment for 1995 declined 1,967to a total of 16,563. Enrollment for Fall 1996declined slightly to 16,215.

Year

ENROLLMENT

Public Non-Public91 131,576 15,803

92 133,675 17,454

93 135,267 17,497

94 135,494 18,503

95 134,952 16,536

96 133,883 16,215

Dropout Rafes

Dropout rates for South Dakota's public schoolsrose slightly from the previous year. Dropout ratesfor the 1995/96 school year were 2.74%. This rateis still above the 2.11% for the 1991/92 school year.

Private schools have had a more erratic dropoutpattern. For the 1995/96 school year the dropoutrate declined slightly to 8.21%.

The percent of total dropouts in public schoolsvaried by race. Of the total number of dropouts,70.7% were White, 25.9% were Native American,and 2.4% were of Other Races.

Of the total number of dropouts in non-publicschools, 4.3% were White, and 95.7% were NativeAmerican.

16

Dropout Rates

Year Public Non-Public91/92 2.11 9.17

92/93 2.51 7.13

93/94 2.61 9.36

94/95 2.53 8.90

95/96 2.74 8.21

21atile-boavde 42CLL:N.,_..1k,TASiOir; i1'


Disability Daia

Information on children with disabilities is obtainedfrom the Child Count done every December by theDepartment of Education and Cultural Affairs. Thecount is done to determine age, disabling condition,and placement alternatives for children with specialneeds. This information includes Chapter I Stateoperated/supported programs but does not includeprivate or BIA schools.

On December 1, 1995 there were 15,512 childrenwith disabling conditions in the State. South Dakotalaw mandates that a free special education programbe provided to any person under the age of 21.The degree of interaction between the specialeducation student and the regular education studentis described through a continuum of placementalternatives available to the special educationstudent. These alternatives include:

*Regular classroom with modifications

*Resource Room - Services outside the regularclassroom for more than 21% but less than 60% ofthe school day.

*Self-contained classroom Services outside of theregular classroom for more than 60% of the day.

*Day program A special education program in afacility other than the student's district of residencefor more than 50% of the instructional day.

.24-hour program Placed in a 24-hour residential/educational program (in or out of state).

.Home /Hospital - Placement where children andyouth with disabilities receive special education inmedical treatment facilities or at home.

There were 55.3% special education studentsserved in a regular classroom with modificationsand 21.3% served in a resource room in 1995.

Disabling ConditionDec. 1994 Dec. 1995

Deaf/Blind 4 4

Serious EmotionallyDisturbed 620 606

MentalRetardation 1,512 1,559

HearingImpairment 119 107

Specific LearningDisabled 7,047 6,697

MultipleDisabilities 529 493

OrthopedicImpairments 142 112

VisuallyImpaired 68 55

Deaf 62 49

Speech/LanguageImpairments 4,402 3,345

Other HealthImpairments 177 203

Autism 57 66

Traumatic BrainInjury 33 40

PreschoolAges 3-5 983 2,176*

*This number reflects the fact that school districts are reporting preschoolers under this category rather than the specificdisability.

:

Soufh Dakoia KIDS COUNT Project2 17

>Per Capita Personal Income

>AFDC & Foodsiamp Usage

>Women in the Work Force

>Child Care

>Poverty Statistics

Key

Economic

Indicators

tYG01;

IYG

23

IYG

cfrZRr Per Capiia Personal Income

n 1993, South Dakota had a per capita personal income(PCPI) of $17,879. This PCPI ranked 38th in the UnitedStates and was 86% of the national average. The 1993PCPI reflected an increase of 3.5% from 1992. PCPIincludes the net earnings (wages and salaries, and otherlabor income, and net proprietors' income); dividends,interest, and rent; and transfer payments (low incomehousing payments, foodstamps, etc.) received by theresidents of South Dakota. In 1993 earnings were 66.1% ofpersonal income; dividends, interest, and rent were 17.0%;and transfer payments were 17.0%.

In 1983 South Dakota's PCPI was $9,684 and ranked 44thin the United States. The average annual growth rate forper capita personal income over the past 10 years was 6.3%compared to a national annual growth rate of 5.5% for thesame time period. From 1983 to 1993 the percent of PCPIfrom earnings increased 7.6%; dividends, interest, and rentincreased 3.7%; and transfer payments increased 6.7%.

Source: Regional Economic Information System, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Bearfacts, obtained from the State DataCenter of South Dakota.

c0mr AFDC & FoodsfamptoFiscal year average participation in AFDC and the Foodstampprogram declined from 1995 to 1996. While 2.3% of thepopulation in South Dakota received AFDC payments in 1996,2.4% did so in 1995. Similarly, 7% of the population receivedfoodstamps in 1995 compared to 6.8% in 1996.

An average of 11,971 children and 6,056 families participatedin the AFDC program in 1996 (compared to 12,724 childrenand 6,446 families in 1995). Of the 16,461 recipients of AFDCpayments in 1996, 73% were children. While the numbers aredecreasing, the percent of children receiving AFDC increasedslightly from 1994 to 1996. There was an average of 18,720households receiving foodstamps in 1996 compared to 18,825in 1995. The average amount of foodstamps per person was$67 in 1996.

Please note that this data does not include GeneralAssistance payments available from the Tribal Governmentsto its members.Source: South Dakota Department of Social Services

20 24;

.112.1.1,011EMIWE,

Number Participatingin Fiscal Year 1996

Age Foodstamp Medicaid

0-4 9,577 14,847

5-13 13,198 16,268

14-17 3,479 3,912

TOTAL 26,254 35,027

Sough Dakoia KIDS COUNT Proieci

ii; Women in the Work ForceThe growth in South Dakota's labor force was7.6% between the 1980 and 1990 Census. Thiswas due to the increased participation in the laborforce by women. In fact, there were 20.3% morewomen in the labor force in 1990 than in 1980.

In the 1980 Census South Dakota was near thenational average for the percentage of women withchildren in the work force. While 45.7% of womennationally with children under 6 participated in thework force, 50.9% did so in South Dakota.Similarly, 63.0% of those with children 6-17 were inthe labor force nationally compared to 64.5% inSouth Dakota. By the 1990 Census the gap hadwidened and while 59.7% of the women withpreschoolers were participating in the work forcenationally, 71.3% of those in South Dakota weredoing so. And 75.0% of the women with children6-17 were in the labor force nationally compare to81.8% of this same cohort in South Dakota. Basedon the 1990 Census, South Dakota had thehighest percent in the nation of women withpreschoolers who participated in the work force.

Mothers in the Work Force, 1990Percent women 16 and over with children

71

82 75

60

South Dakota United States

0With kids under 6 With kids 6-17

Source: 1990 Census of Population and Housing, Bureau of the Census, obtained from the State Data Center of South Dakota

Child CareChildren are entering child care at a younger ageand are in care for longer hours each day. Veryyoung children need significant amounts of careand attention. When parents work, or attendschool, this care must be provided by anothercaregiver. Given the fact that almost three-fourthsof South Dakota women with preschoolers workthe availability of child care is extremely important.

Since 1991 there has been a 70.7% increase in thenumber of licensed and registered child careprograms in the state. Licensed or registeredproviders can receive state funding in the form ofgrants, food program reimbursements, andpayment for services provided to the children offamilies receiving child care subsidies. Child caresubsidy programs provide assistance for lowincome families while they work or go to school.

Source: Office of Child Care Services, Department of Social Services.

Regulated Day Care1994 1995 1996+

Family Day Care 1,150 1,191 1,176Group Family Day Care 53 57 59Day Care Centers 118 131 138

+As of 10-1-96

Subsidy ProgramsFiscal Year 1996

AFDC child care 837

Transitional child care 383

non-AFDC child care 2,934

Soufh Dakoia KIDS COUNT Pro:lied21

Poverfy Slafisfics wr-4.03wvo

According to the 1990 Census of Population and Housing, 13.1% ofthe U.S. population lived below the poverty level compared to 15.9%for South Dakota. The number and percent of persons below povertyand families below poverty dropped between 1980 and 1990 forSouth Dakota. Even so, South Dakota has higher rates of povertythan the U.S., with Shannon County having the highest rate ofpersons below poverty in the U.S., with 63.1% of the population livingin poverty.

The segments where South Dakota showed an increasing proportionliving below the poverty level were those involving children. In fact,two-thirds of the South Dakota female householder families withrelated children under 5 years were living in poverty. Nationally,57.4% of this type of family lived in poverty. Specifically thecategories which showed an increase in poverty between the 1980and 1990 Censuses were:

related children under 5 yearsfamilies with related children under 5 yearsfemale householder familiesfemale householder families with children under 18 yearsfemale householder families with children under 5 years

Two counties (Shannon, 63.1% and Todd, 50.2%) have more than50% of their total population below the poverty level. Nine SouthDakota counties have more than one-third of their population belowpoverty. These are the same nine counties with more than 50% oftheir children living in poverty. These counties and their percent ofchildren below poverty are:

Bennett 50.8%Buffalo - 53.7%Corson - 51.5%

Dewey - 53.6%Jackson - 54.9%Mellette 50.6%

Shannon - 69.5%Todd 56.2%Ziebach - 61.1%

When looking at the percent of a category to determine trends orneed, take care to evaluate the numbers as well. For example, therewas a higher percent in 1989 of South Dakota families with relatedchildren under 5 years living in poverty than in 1979 (20.7% in 89 and19.8% in 79). Evaluating this alone might lead one to conclude thereis an increasing poverty problem for families with children under 5and that there should be a corresponding increase in demand forassistance by families in this category. However, when looking at theraw numbers one sees that, in fact, there were 121 fewer familieswith children under 5 living in poverty. This does not mean that aproblem does not exist just that one needs to use the raw numbersas well as the percents when looking at or planning the level ofdemand for assistance.

22

SD Percent Below Poverty Statistics1979

All Persons 16.9%

Related childrenunder 18 20.0%


All Families 13.1%



1989

15.9%

20.1%

23.6%

11.6%

16.5%

20.7%

Female HeadedFamilies 34.4% 38.7%

Related childrenunder 18 44.1% 48.8%

Related childrenunder 5 NC* 66.2%

*Not calculated

Ziliaktallilialtillintalledeatalleasumemeissimmemon

Souih Dakoia KIDS COUNT Proieci

Poverty by Race and Age

Age

0-456-1112-17All ages

White

16.4%16.5%15.2%12.3%12.6%

s..rt

Percent Below Poverty, 1989

NativeAmerican Black Asian

70.1% 29.4%66.9% 19.5%60.2% 24.2%58.7% 27.3%57.1% 19.6%

25.7%31.7%17.3%9.5%

18.4%

Source: 1990 Census of Population and Housing, State Data Center of South Dakota

Families with Children under 18Percent Below Poverty, 1989

Family Status

Married CoupleFamilies

Male HouseholderFamilies, no spouse present

Female HouseholderFamilies, no spouse present

Other

29.5%39.7%30.1%16.0%26.1%

NativeWhite American Other Total

8.2% 40.4% 13.7% 9.8%

19.8% 66.7% 33.3% 31.2%

41.4% 71.3% 61.3% 48.8%

Source: 1990 Census of Population and Housing, State Data Center of South Dakota

st-rvittlil033(1714501ust$

Most Recent Poverty EstimatesIn 1993 there were 39.3 million persons below poverty level in the United States representing15.1% of the Nation's population. The percent of children under 18 in the United States inpoverty for the same time period was 22.7%. Nationally children represent a very largesegment of those in poverty making up 40.1%. This is important in light of the fact that they areonly a little more than one-fourth of the total population.

In 1992, 19.1% of the children under the age of 18 lived in poverty in South Dakota. The 1993estimates put this figure at 17.0%.

Source: Current Population Reports, Series P60-188, US Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, 1990and 1980 Census of Population and Housing; obtained from the State Data Center of South Dakota.

MINIMUNINUNIMISMINUENSWIWPW,,, IfrilE5t'12`7


IYG

>You fh Related Traffic Statistics

>Juvenile Justice Statistics

>Juvenile Drug & Alcohol Statistics

>Child Abuse and Dueled Statistics

Key

Sal*Indicators

2

/

of

Youth Related Traffic Statistics

Youth Fatalities & InjuriesThere were 158 fatalities on South Dakota's roads in 1995.Twenty-two of these were youth between the ages of 0 - 19,representing 14% of the total fatalities. Fifteen (9.5%) of thefatalities were between the ages 14 - 19.

The percentage of injuries to youth was 32.5%. There were8,323 injuries from motor vehicle accidents, of which 2,709were to youth between 0 -19 years of age. Youth between theages of 14 19 accounted for 24.3% (2,023) of the totalinjuries for 1995.

Safety Equipment UsageSince the Child Passenger Restraint System took effect onJanuary 1, 1984, there have been 26 deaths to children under5 years old in South Dakota. Two of these children wererestrained by a child safety restraint properly used and nonehave been restrained by a lap belt or lap and shoulderharness. In 1995 there were 136 injuries to children under agefive. Eighty-three of the 136 injured children were restrainedby a lap belt, lap and shoulder harness, or a child safetyrestraint used properly.

Alcohol Involved AccidentsThere were a total of 70 fatalities in alcohol related accidentsin 1995; 6 of those were to youth from ages 13 through 19.Alcohol involvement for fatal accidents is based upon apositive blood alcohol concentration (BAC) result and/orindication of alcohol use by at least one driver, pedestrian orbicyclist as reported by the officer who investigated theaccident. Of all accident related fatalities to youth birth to 19,31.4% involved alcohol.

26

kMW-4-110-

Fatalities and Injuries by Age1995

Age Fatalities Injuries0-5 3 2086-13 4 47814-15 7 53616-17 3 84918 2 34019 3 298

Fatalities and Injuries bySafety Equipment Used - 1995

Under 5 years Old

Fatalities-No safety

Injuries

equipment 2 44

-Lap belt only 0 16

'Shoulderharness only 0 1

Lap belt/shoulderharness 0 26

'Child restraintused properly 0 40

'Child restraintnot used prop. 0 5

'Other 0

Not known orstated 0 4

Total 2 136

Source: 1995 South Dakota Motor Vehicle Traffic Accident Summary, Department of Transportation, Accident Records Office

2i South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project

Juvenile Juslice StatisticsJuvenile Crime ReferralsIn the past, the South Dakota KIDS COUNT Factbook used informationfrom the Uniform Crime Report to provide insights into juvenile arrestrates. The Uniform Crime Report is a voluntary program and not all lawenforcement agencies across the State participated or participated foronly part of the year. Because this report may have been missing dataand therefore not providing a clear picture of the indicator of juvenilearrests, the number of juvenile crime referrals is included instead. Thisfigure represents the number of youth under eighteen years of age whoare referred to the Unified Judicial System by the states attorney.Juvenile informational complaints may be filed with the states attorney bylaw enforcement officials, parents, court services officers (allegedprobation violations), and others. The states attorney may decide to file aformal petition (the case goes to court), refer the case to a court servicesdepartment for a 90-day informal adjustment, refer the case to a privateagency approved by the court (alcohol treatment facility or program forexample), or take no action.

From 1995 to 1996 there was an increase of 520 in the number of formalpetitions filed by the states attorney. There was an increase of 240 in thenumber of cases which were referred for some form of informaladjustment (juvenile did not actually go to trial).

Admissions to Juvenile Correctional FacilitiesSouth Dakota has three juvenile correctional facilities; the State TrainingSchool, the Youth Forestry Camp, and the Lamont Youth DevelopmentCenter. Over the last three fiscal years the number of youth admitted tothese facilities has remained fairly stable. In 1996 there were 276 youth instate run correctional facilities compared to 263 in 1995. This stability maybe due to the fact that the correctional institutions will only hold so manyyouth.

There is at least a four month wait to be placed into a state juvenilecorrectional facility. While awaiting placement in a correctional facility ayouth has several options. He/She may wait at home (includes homedetention, or electronic monitoring), they may be placed in a residential orgroup home situation, or they may wait in one of the state's three juveniledetention centers located in Pennington, Minnehaha, and Brown counties.The state is in the process of increasing the potential number of youth itcan serve at correctional facilities by adding a 48 bed boot camp andseveral other additions. These additions will have a dramatic affect on thenumber of admissions to correctional facilities in the future.


Juvenile Crime Referrals

Formal Informal

1993 3,941 2,766

1994 4,514 2,650

1995 4,491 2,618

1996 5,011 2,858

Source: Court Services Dept.,SD Unified Judicial System

Juvenile Admissions toState Facilities

FY94 281FY95 263FY96 276

Source: SD Department ofCorrections

PAO

27

cOwmr Child Abuse and Heeled Sialisfics

Child Protection Services is an office within the South Dakota Department ofSocial Services which identifies children who are abused or neglected,assures provision of services to those and families where protection of the childbecause of abuse or neglect is a concern, and provide permanentalternatives for abused or neglected children who cannot remain in their homeor who cannot be returned home to their family. Child Protection Servicesresponds to reports of child abuse or neglect through an investigation or anassessment. Since the assessment part of the process was instituted in 1995,the statistical reporting is being revised and the current data does not allow forcomparison to prior fiscal years.

The number of assessments completed for state fiscal year 1996 included2,797 children. The dispositions for assessments include no servicesrecommended, services recommended, or other dispositions. Of thoseassessments completed, 22% resulted in services being recommended.

In state fiscal year 1996, investigations were initiated for 6,229 children andinvestigations were completed for 5,806 of those children. Investigations resultin a disposition of substantiated, indicated, unsubstantiated, or other.Substantiated means that based on the facts and definition in state law childabuse and neglect did occur. Indicated means there is circumstantial evidenceor other isolated indicators that abuse or neglect did occur. Unsubstantiatedmeans the facts do not show that abuse or neglect did occur.

Of the 5806 children investigated, there was a finding of substantiated or indicated for 45% of the children.The breakdown by type of abuse or neglect for that 45% is as follows:

trsifaXeME

28

physical abuse 529

sexual abuse 210

physical neglect 1,914

emotional maltreatment 282


Of the 2,617 substantiated and indicated investigations:

1,798 or 69% resulted in the child staying in the home with some form of intervention.

811 resulted in removal of the child (14% of the total children investigated and 31% of thesubstantiated and indicated investigations)

8 of those substantiated investigations, or 0.3%, involved children who were abused or ne-glected while in a residential placement or other institution (foster home, day care, residentialfacility).

The children who must be placed could be returned home at a later stage of the case because thesituation has improved, and the court has ordered the child's return home. The children who arefound to be abused or neglected, and are not placed, could be placed at a later stage of the casewhile services are being provided.

3

Source: South Dakota Department of Social Service, Office of Child Protection Services

tworerweweam.. r.fts


30

Juvenile Drub & Alcohol Sialisfics

In the 1995 South Dakota Youth Risk Behavior Survey, 54% of thehigh school students surveyed said they had at least one drink ofalcohol during the past 30 days, and 39% had five or more drinks in arow in the last 30 days. In the same survey, 24% of the respondentsreported using marijuana sometime during their life and 4% had usedsome form of cocaine. It was also reported by 12% of the studentsthat they had used some other type of illegal drug during theirlifetime. Except for the use of marijuana, the percentages of youthwho used these substances decreased from the 1993 survey. TheYouth Risk Behavior Survey is a random sample of grades ninethrough twelve. All public, private, and Bureau of Indian Affairschools were eligible to be included in the random sample. For the1995 survey a total of 1,192 students from eighteen schoolscompleted the survey. The survey is prepared for the Office ofComprehensive School Health, Department of Education and CulturalAffairs and the Division of Alcohol and Drug Abuse of the SouthDakota Department ofHuman Services.

The South Dakota Department of Human Services, Division ofAlcohol and Drug Abuse, tracks the number of juveniles whoparticipate in state accredited drug and alcohol treatmentprograms. In fiscal year 1994 there were 1,981 juveniles whoreceived services through accredited programs. By fiscal year 1995this figure had risen to 2,032. During fiscal year 1996, there were2,109 juvenile clients who accessed services. Increases haveoccurred across all racial groups except white where the numberdecreased only slightly.

Of the youth participating in alcohol or drug programs inFY 1996, almost two-thirds were White (62.6%), 31.1% were NativeAmerican, and 6.3% were members of Other races. In FY 199564.4% were White, 32.2% were Native American, and 3.3 % weremembers of Other races.

Source: South Dakota Department of Human Services,Division of Alcohol and Drug Abuse

Soufh Dakota KIDS COUNT Proied

>A Comfy by (only look at

some of the Key Indicators of

Child We II-Being

4g,

Safe and Couniv

Daia Tables

nJ

\ ,)

\\` \V,

Soufh Dakota 1995 Population Estimate 729,034

1980 1990 1994 (est.)Percent of Population

Population under 20 234,628 .219,307 230,639 Under 20 in 1994:White 207,475 190,560 199,702 31.9%American Indian 23,724 25,469 27,889Black 793 1,365 1,435 Percent of PopulationOther 2,636 1,913 1,613 Under 5 in 1994:

Population under 5 58,446 54,504 54,301 7.5%

Key Health Indicators

1995Number % or Rate

1991-95(Combined Rate)Number % or Rate

Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) 99 9.46 506 9.44Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) 37 23.25 232 29.28Low Birth Weight Babies ( %) 585 5.6% 2,949 5.5%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) 38 75.14 213 84.63Births to Single Teens (%) 976 9.3% 4,711 8.8%Women Receiving Prenatal Care

(%, during first trimester) 8,393 81.7% 42,048 80.2%

School District: Drop-Out Rate94/95 95/96

Key Education Indicators

Enrollment Children with a DisabilityFall 95 Fall 96 Dec. 94 Dec. 95

State of South Dakota 2.53% 2.74% 134,952 133,883 15,755 15,512

Private Schools 8.90% 8.21% 16,536 16,215 NA NA(Inc. BIA & Parochial)

32

li

Juvenile Offense ReferralsFormal

ViolentInformal

Admission to JuvenileCorrectional Facilities

Juvenile Admissions to Drugor Alcohol Treatment Programs

1993 1994

3,941 4,514183 192

2,766 2,650

FY 95 FY 96

263 273

2,032 2,109

Key Safely Indicators

1980 1990

Teens not inSchool & not inLabor Force orUnemployed 6.5% 4 1%

3 z) South Dakoia KIDS COUNT Project

South Dakota

Family Profile

kV, Of

1990 Total Family Households

Married Couple FamiliesWith childrenWithout children

Female Headed FamiliesWith childrenWithout children

Male Headed FamiliesWith childrenWithout children

180,306

1980 1990

156,747 152,51983,020 75,79873,727 76,72116,626 20,71110,644 15,1915,982 5,5205,383 7,0762,039 3,9273,344 3,149

Percent Below Poverty Statistics 1979 1989

All Persons 16.9% 15.9%Related children under 18 20.0% 20.1%Related children under 5 21.4% 23.6%

All Families 13.1% 11.6%Related children under 18 16.6% 16.5%Related children under 5 19.8% 20.7%

Female Headed Families 34.4% 38.7%Related children under 18 44.1% 48.8%Related children under 5 NC 66.2%

Median Family Income $26,804 $27,602

AFDC/Foodstamp Participation 1995 1996

AFDC Basic Participation (fiscal year average)Families 6,446 6,056Recipients 17,610 16,461Children 12,724 11,971

Population Receiving AFDC (%) 2.4% 2.3%

Foodstamp Participation (fiscal year average)Households 18,825 18,720Persons 50,817 49,743Avg. per person $65 $67

Population Receiving Foodstamps (%) 7.0% 6.8%

Females 16 and over in Labor Force (%) 1980 1990

Total 49.3% 58.5%With children under 6 50.9% 71.3%With children 6-17 64.5% 81.8%


Aurora1980 1990

Population under 20 1,212 984White 1,192 936American Indian 19 42Black .) 0Other 1 6

Population under 5 266 183

1995 Population Estimate 3,091

1994 (est.)Percent of Population

948 Under 20 in 1994:905 31.4%

410 Percent of Population2 Under 5 in 1994:

177 5.7%




Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) <3 38.46 3 18.40Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) 0 0 0 0Low Birth Weight Babies (%) 3 11.5% 12 7.4%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) 0 0 <3 70.92Births to Single Teens (%) 0 0 4 2.5%Women Receiving Prenatal Care

(%, during first trimester) 22 91.7% 129 80.1%


School District: Drop-Out Rate Enrollment Children with a Disability94/95 95/96 Fall 95 Fall 96 Dec. 94 Dec. 95

Plankinton 0.00% 4.11% 265 255 18 18Stickney 0.00% 1.22% 172 168 13 9White Lake 0.00% 2.27% 185 180 14 21

Private Schools 0.00% 0.00% 109 106 NA NA(Inc. BIA & Parochial)

1993 1994Juvenile Offense Referrals

Formal <3 17Violent 0 0

Informal <3 4

Admission to Juvenile FY 95 FY 96

Correctional Facilities 0 0Juvenile Admissions to Drugor Alcohol Treatment PrOgrams 7 2

34


Teens not inSchool & not inLabor Force orUnemployed

1980 1990

3.7% 0.0%


Family Profile

1990 TotalTotal Family Households 815

Married Couple Families 880 736With children 445 345Without children 435 391

Female Headed Families 48 55With children 15 26Without children 33 29

Male Headed Families 31 24With children 6 7Without children 25 17

Percent Below Poverty Statistics

All PersonsRelated children under 18Related children under 5

All FamiliesRelated children under 18Related children under 5

Female Headed FamiliesRelated children under 18Related children under 5

Median Family Income

AFDC/Foodstamp Participation

AFDC Basic Participation (fiscal year average)FamiliesRecipientsChildren

Population Receiving AFDC (%)

Foodstamp Participation (fiscal year average)HouseholdsPersonsAvg. per person

Population Receiving Foodstamps (%)

Females 16 and over in Labor Force (%)

TotalWith children under 6With children 6-17


1979 1989

24.0% 15.0%31.4% 14.0%27.1% 21.4%19.6% 13.2%26.1% 13.0%27.4% 17.9%25.0% 25.0%52.9% 47.1%

NC 0.0%

$21,289 $19,583

1995 1996

4 3.10 9

7 5.0.3% 0.3%

33 36110 113$48 $51

3.6% 3.7%

1980 1990

33.4% 49.0%41.0% 55.4%42.5% 79.8%

35


Population under 20 5,893 5,312 5,287 Under 20 in 1994:White 5,782 5,160 5,150 29.2%American Indian 60 88 94Black 16 30 27 Percent of PopulationOther 35 34 16 Under 5 in 1994:


Key kaki% Indicators



Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) <3 9.13 8 6.74Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) 0 0 4 20.16Low Birth Weight Babies (%) 9 4.1% 47 4.0%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) 0 0 6 104.90Births to Single Teens (%) 13 5.9% 88 7.4%Women Receiving Prenatal Care



Hitchcock 0.00% 0.00% 132 132 6 5Huron 3.37% 3.45% 2,621 2,599 353 326Iroquois 0.75% 0.65% 315 308 60 63Wessington 0.00% 0.00% 146 142 15 17Wolsey 0.76% 2.42% 232 219 26 29


`1111111/ 1I 1993 1994Juvenile Offense Referrals

Formal 124 151Violent 8 3

Informal 45 44


Correctional Facilities 4 6Juvenile Admissions to Drugor Alcohol Treatment Programs 46 55

36

Key Safe4y Indicafors

1980 1990

Teens not inSchool & not inLabor Force orUnemployed 7.0% 3.3%

"l'N----------Na---8"----rg-7oh Dakota KIDSDS COUNT Projeci

Family Profile

1990 Total Family Households 4,940

1980

Married Couple Families 4,751With children 2,374Without children 2,377

Female Headed Families 440With children 253Without children 187

Male Headed Families 133With children 45Without children 88

Key Economic Indicafors

Percent Below Poverty Statistics 1979

All Persons 14.0%Related children under 18 15.7%Related children under 5 19.6%

All Families 10.7%Related children under 18 15.0%Related children under 5 18.1%

Female Headed Families 34.8%Related children under 18 57.2%Related children under 5 NC

Median Family Income $28,960

AFDC/Foodstamp Participation 1995

AFDC Basic Participation (fiscal year average)Families 58Recipients 144Children 102

Population Receiving AFDC (%) 0.8%

Foodstamp Participation (fiscal year average)Households 355Persons 710Avg. per person $57

Population Receiving Foodstamps (%) 4.0%

Females 16 and over in Labor Force (%) 1980

Total 47.1%With children under 6 50.2%With children 6-17 62.8%

1990

4,2661,9452,321

50536114416910762-

1989

13.2%16.5%18.0%9.0%

14.4%16.3%33.9%49.7%55.1%

$27,354

1996

4911785

0.6%

335645$59

3.6%

1990

55.1%78.7%80.9%

Soufh Dakoia KIDS COUNT Project 37

Benne*,1980 1990

Population under 20 1,216 1,233White 556 461American Indian 653 765Black 0 4Other 7 3




1,307 Under 20 in 1994:478 39.6%824


317 9.6%




Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) 0 0 <3 5.80Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) 0 0 <3 20.99Low Birth Weight Babies ( %) <3 3.3% 18 5.2%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) 0 0 <3 161.94Births to Single Teens ( %) 12 20.0% 56 16.2%Women Receiving Prenatal Care

( %, during first trimester) 40 66.7% 224 66.9%

School District: Drop-Out Rate94/95

Bennett County 4.18%

Private Schools 0.00%(Inc. BIA & Parochial)

'66


ViolentInformal



38


Enrollment Children with a Disability95/96 Fall 95 Fall 96 Dec. 94 Dec. 95

3.28% 630 628 63 79

0.00% 186 211 NA NA

1993 1994

150

12

FY 95

0

3

30

13

FY 96

2

6


1980

17.0%

1990

4.6%


Family Profile

itLI104,-

1990 Total Family Households 749




627348279

99584117

215

57330526813210032443212

Key Economic Indicators







AFDC Basic Participation (fiscal year average)Families 170 177Recipients 524 533Children 401 407


Foodstamp Participation (fiscal year average)Households 273 289Persons 971 1,003Avg. per person $68 $70


Frnales 16 and over in Labor Force (%) 1980 1990


oarrra


Bon Homme 1995 Population 7,008



Population under 5 577 465 431 6.2%

Number

Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) <3Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) 0Low Birth Weight Babies (%) 6Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) 0Births to Single Teens ( %) 3Women Receiving Prenatal Care

(%, during first trimester) 71


1995 1991-95(Combined Rate)% or Rate Number % or Rate

12.35 3 7.280 5 72.31

7.4% 22 5.3%0 <3 45.77

3.7% 18 4.4%

89.9% 329 80.8%


J


Avon 0.00% 0.00% 267 265 35 26Bon Homme 0.80% 0.53% 806 804 129 126Scotland 0.43% 0.00% 495 475 62 61

Private Schools NA NA NA NA NA NA(Inc. BIA & Parochial)

1993Juvenile Offense Referrals

Formal 3Violent <3

Informal 30

Admission to Juvenile FY 95

Correctional Facilities 0Juvenile Admissions to Drug

or Alcohol Treatment Programs 1

ttiAMICRONCM,4:ONSPINIRW9P0 4111,101111411111RIPSIWAIPtianid'A 4404107,0111=4WIPAICASSZIOM4V0004PM

40

1994

00

13

FY 96

0

28



1980

0.4%

1990

4.1%

RACIARMIN4C4144411014011$1114 .


Bon Nomme

Family Profile

VI1990 Total Family Households 1,852

1980 1990

Married Couple Families 1,961 1,677With children 936 709Without children 1,025 968
















WinfaWarraurriant-JealTsPtol

1979 1989

22.5% 15.3%27.5% 13.8%31.5% 21.1%17.3% 12.1%22.5% 13.7%30.1% 19.9%28.2% 21.3%40.6% 35.4%

NC 80.0%

$22,336 $21,324

1995 1996

21 1853 4134 26

0.8% 0.6%

102 98235 229.

$60 $593.4% 3.3%

1980 1990

45.6% 46.7%56.7% 69.8%70.2% 83.7%

South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project', 41





c014---ms. Key Health Indicators


1991-95(Combined Rate)Number °A) or Rate

Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) 0 0 6 3.68Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) 0 0 3 12.89Low Birth Weight Babies ( %) 17 5.2% 80 4.9%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) 0 0 <3 14.19Births to Single Teens (%) 25 7.6% 83 5.1%Women Receiving Prenatal Care

(%, during first trimester) 284 88.8% 1,449 90.9%



EnrollmentFall 95 Fall 96

Children with a DisabilityDec. 94 Dec. 95

Brookings 0.84% 1.06% 2,948 2,906 250 246Elkton 1.76% 0.00% 361 391 46 39Sioux Valley 0.87% 0.29% 656 673 58 58Deubrook 0.00% 0.00% 348 344 52 53Lake Hendricks NA NA NA NA 4 3Private Schools 0.00% 0.00% 93 42 NA NA(Inc. BIA & Parochial)


Formal 102 107Violent <2 0

Informal 48 34


Correctional Facilities 13 7Juvenile Admissions to Drug

or Alcohol Treatment Programs 47 47

42

1980 1990



Brookings

Family Profile

IA I


1980 1990

Married Couple Families 4,851 4,892With children 2,551 2,405Without children 2,300 2,487












Foodstamp Participation (fiscal year average)Households 435 409Persons 899 807Avg. per person $67 $71




Sough Dakota KIDS COUNT Projectlt

WIVIM-1,1116AMWVORMWantat,t^

43

Population under 20WhiteAmerican IndianBlackOther

Population under 5

Brown

,4-42'4, ',:`, - - --,,



12,273 10,580 10,726 Under 20 in 1994:11,749 10,021 10,152 30.0%

439 463 48611 22 21 Percent of Population74 74 67 Under 5 in 1994:

2,808 2,472 2,322 6.5%




Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) 3 6.67 14 6.09Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) <3 27.16 7 19.01Low Birth Weight Babies (%) 21 4.7% 109 4.7%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) <3 71.53 5 35.77Births to Single Teens (%) 30 6.7% 151 6.6%Women Receiving Prenatal Care



Aberdeen 2.71%Elm Valley 2.02%Groton 0.83%Hecla-Houghton 0.00%Warner 0.74%



Enrollment Children with a Disability95/96 Fall 95 Fall 96 Dec. 94 Dec. 95

2.25% 4,502 4,353 549 5590.00% 194 208 23 220.38% 558 570 83 810.00% 146 142 18 150.74% 290 278 28 22

0.00% 876 853 NA NA


ViolentInformal



1993

1156

78

FY 95

13

65

1994

1373

56

FY 96

20

106

ey Safely Indicators


1980

4.0%

1990

2.2%

V ..674kt

4? South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project

zr

Brown

Family Profile


I-- Key Economic Indicafors

1980 1990


Female Headed Families 1,011 1,082With children 712 770Without children 299 312


.1111.41.







AFDC Basic Participation (fiscal year average)Families 185 154

Recipients 452 369Children 307 251


Foodstamp Participation (fiscal year average)Households 807 739Persons 1,728 1,540Avg. per person $60 $59





1980 1990

Population under 20 1,789 1,918White 1,726 1,619American Indian 59 285Black (. ) 2Other 4 12



1,992 Under 20 in 1994:1,661 35.3%

3172 Percent of Population

12 Under 5 in 1994:416 7.4%




Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) <3 12.20 <3 5.06Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) 0 0 0 0Low Birth Weight Babies (%) <3 2.4% 19 4.8%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) 0 0 <3 106.67Births to Single Teens (%) 6 7.3% 42 10.6%Women Receiving Prenatal Care


c(i)orPrrSchool District: Drop-Out Rate

94/95 95/96

Chamberlain 4.94% 2.54%Kimball 0.00% 2.27%

Private Schools 0.00% 0.00%(Inc. BIA & Parochial)



1,027 1,000 90 81348 346 29 28

175 177 NA NA

0410.nrr 1993 1994Juvenile Offense Referrals

Formal 9 15Violent 0 <3

Informal 16 28




1980 1990


46 4 a South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project

Brute

Family Profile

%VI /1990 Total Family Households 1,354


1980

Married Couple Families 1,242With children 627Without children 615















1990

1,2015976041057926481731

1989

18.5%24.1%27.6%13.0%18.3%22.8%23.5%31.8%61.5%

$26,629

1996

164331

0.8%

98225$61

4.0%

1990

59.8%79.6%88.1%

South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project 50 47

'441,

BuffaloVat 3-40,41141-les: *vsaaitlitillankelaticiateattINIVIGOWKI412V,1

1995 Population Estimate 1,832W. *MP, iirt


Population under 20 886 842 896 Under 20 in 1994:White (...) 131 132 49.1%American Indian 703 711 764Black 0 0 0 Percent of PopulationOther 183 0 0 Under 5 in 1994:

Population under 5 246 221 230 12.6%Flif401-....,

1995Number

Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) <3Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) 0Low Birth Weight Babies (%) 3Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) 0Births to Single Teens (%) 11

Women Receiving Prenatal Care(%, during first trimester) 33


Public Schools NA NA

Private Schools(Inc. BIA and Parochial) NA NA NA


% or Rate1991-95(Combined Rate)Number % or Rate

46.51 5 25.770 3 95.24

7.0% 13 6.7%0 4 487.80

25.6% 48 24.7%

82.5% 127 68.3%

ey Education Indicators


NA NA NA NA

NA NA NA


ViolentInformal


Correctional Facilities 0 1

Juvenile Admissions to Drugor Alcohol Treatment Programs 21 22

1993 1994

5 <30 03 6

Key Safety Indicators

1980 1990

Teens not inSchool & not inLabor Force orUnemployed 47.5% .... 15.8%

48South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project

Buffalo

Family Profile



1980 1990





All PersonsRelaed children under 18Related children under 5












1979 1989

42.5% 45.1%47.8% 53.7%39.3% 54.4%38.0% 39.7%46.2% 47.0%37.9% 56.5%56.1% 66.1%60.0% 72.0%

NC 80.9%

$15,922 $14,639

1995 1996

76 83191 203157 164

10.4% 11.1%

134 148469 502$63 $66

25.6% 27.4%

1980 1990

47.4% 52.9%48.8% 65.0%57.1% 72.6%

49

Bulk 1995 Population Estimate 8,896


Population under 20 2,802 2,463 2,806 Under 20 in 1994:White 2,690 2,338 2,701 31.4%American Indian 44 54 81Black (. .) 8 8 Percent of PopulationOther 68 63 16 Under 5 in 1994:





Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) 0 0 4 6.10Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) <3 109.71 3 32.91Low Birth Weight Babies (%) 6 4.7% 46 7.0%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) 0 0 <3 79.21Births to Single Teens (%) 15 11.7% 62 9.5%Women Receiving Prenatal Care






Belle Fourche 2.48% 3.19% 1,428 1,419 144 130Newell 0.79% 0.76% 574 576 80 77


cs&*--pwrJuvenile Offense Referrals

FormalViolent

Informal



1993 1994

41 346 <3

35 86

FY 95 FY 96

4 3

23 31

50



1980 1990

7.9% 5.6%

5:.j South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project

Family Profile

ice!/



1980 1990

Married Couple Families 1,951 1,832With children 1,018 902Without children 933 930



litrmakQ

Percent Below Poverty Statistics 1979 , 1989













441,14,47.44:404-

Campbell 1995 Population Estimate 1,881


Population under 20 669 526 502 Under 20 in 1994:White 666 522 498 26.5%American Indian (. .) 2 2Black 0 2 2 Percent of PopulationOther 3 0 0 Under 5 in 1994:


1995

Key ileallh Indicators

1991-95(Combined Rate)Number % or Rate Number % or Rate

Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) 0 0 <3 8.26Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) <3 248.14 <3 99.26Low Birth Weight Babies (%) 0 0 4 3.3%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) 0 0 0 0Births to Single Teens (%) 0 0 4 3.3%Women Receiving Prenatal Care




Herreid 0.00% 0.00% 167 180 21 18Pollock 0.00% 0.00% 150 153 17 17



ViolentInformal



1993 1994

4 <30 0

<3 <3

FY 95 FY 96

0 0

0 2

52


1980 1990


South Dakota KIDS COUNT Proleci

Campbell

Family Profile



1980 1990










AFDC Basic Participation (fiscal year average)Families 2

Recipients 6

Children 4Population Receiving AFDC (%) 0.3%

Foodstamp Participation (fiscal year average)Households 22Persons 53

Avg. per person $61




1989

18.3%18.7%15.9%16.0%16.0%13.6%29.0%50.0%

100.0%

$20,771

1996

1

32

0.2%

2558

$643.1%

1990

46.6%67.6%67.6%

Soul 11 Dakoia KIDS COUNT Proieci53

kiifiri.i.44440401.12PtelVit2PIR.kta=4141.0.-170

Charles MixPopulation under 20

WhiteAmerican IndianBlackOther

Population under 5

1980 1990

3,511 3,1352,640 2,094

864 1036

(...) 27 3

908 807


1994 (est.)

3,2392,1371098

22

769

Percent of Population.Under 20 in 1994:34.7%

Percent of PopulationUnder 5 in 1994:8.2%


1995 1991-95(Combined Rate)Number % or Rate

Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births)Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14)Low Birth Weight Babies (%)Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19)Births to Single Teens (%)Women Receiving Prenatal Care

(%, during first trimester)


Andes Central 12.57%Geddes 0.00%Platte 1.65%Wagner 12.85%



ViolentInformal



3 15.63<3 43.5712 6.3%<3 145.7726 13.5%

127 67.6%

Number % or Rate

10 11.496 52.29

41 4.7%7 204.08

118 13.6%

602 70.1%


Enrollment Children with a DisabilityFall 9695/96 Fall 95

7.83% 3793.49% 1570.79% 522

10.97% 796

7.96% 362

1993 1994

57 878 12

52 47

54

404152525783

Dec. 94 Dec. 95

63 5914 1043 42

104 95

350 NA NA

Key Saki Indicators

1980 1990


5 South Dakota KIDS COUNT Proied

Charles Mix

Family Profile



1980 1990

Married Couple Families 2,038 1,899With children 1,057 946Without children 981 953










Recipients 345Children 272


Foodstamp Participation (fiscal year average)Households 292Persons 1,005Avg. per person $65




1989

31.4%41.4%44.9%24.4%32.3%35.3%59.7%70.6%77.6%

$20,512

1996

154412325

4.3%

3281,118

$6611.8%

1990

47.9%63.2%75.5%

58South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project 55

Clark1980 1990

Population under 20 1,468 1,317White 1,457 1,299American Indian (. .) 8Black .) 5Other 11 5





1994 (est.) .

Percent of Population1,317 Under 20 in 1994:1,298 30.2%

8


0 00 0

<3 3.2%0 0

<3 1.6%

47 75.8%

65

282




<3 3.700 0

13 4.8%<3 68.4911 4.1%

187 71.1%





Clark 2.42% 0.68% 589 667 55 64Willow Lake 0.89% 0.00% 266 250 23 27



ViolentInformal



!,...C.1,4

1993 1994

3 110 03 <3

FY 95 FY 96

0 0

0 2


1980 1990


56 5 i) South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project

Clark

Family Profile



1,218

1980 1990

Married Couple Families 1,287 1,129With children 597 487Without children 690 642


Male Headed Families 44 32With children 8 11

Without children 36 21















Clay 1995 Population Estimate 13,606







Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) <3 6.54 8 10.83Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) 0 0 4 37.24Low Birth Weight Babies ( %) 4 2.6% 24 3.3%

Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) <3 54.47 <3 10.89Births to Single Teens (%) 7 4.6% 37 5.0%Women Receiving Prenatal Care



Vermillion 0.96% 0.96%Wakonda 0.00% 0.00%


58


ViolentInformal




Enrollment Children with a DisabilityFall 95

1,407215

95

Fall 96 Dec. 94 Dec. 95

1,386 139 135207 39 32

108 NA NA

1993

320

36

FY 95

1

1994

250

34

FY 96

3


1980 1990


4%.


Clay

Family Profile



1980 1990














1980 1990Females 16 and over in Labor Force (%)

Total 47.9% 57.9%With children under 6 53.7%With children 6-17 65.8% 79.7%


Codinefon 1995 Population Estimate 24,829


Population under 20 7,067 7,150 7,832 Under 20 in 1994:White 6,934 6,980 7,628 31.9%American Indian 100 126 145Black .) 11 13 Percent of PopulationOther 33 33 46 Under 5 in 1994:


Key Hearn% Indicators



Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) <3 2.51 15 8.33Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) <3 38.31 6 22.98Low Birth Weight Babies (%) 28 7.0% 104 5.8%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) <3 61.46 4 49.17Births to Single Teens (%) 36 9.0% 144 8.0%Women Receiving Prenatal Care




Florence 1.37% 1.19% 180 189 15 18Henry 1.33% 1.37% 137 139 25 22South Shore 0.00% 0.00% 141 140 20 15Watertown 2.03% 2.59% 4,272 4,251 374 389Waverly 0.00% 1.10% 127 127 13 14



ViolentInformal




1993 1994

88 89<3 <3

137 113

60

Safely Indicators

1980 1990

Teens not inSchool & not inLabor Force orUnemployed 4.6%

6 2

3.8%


CodinIon

Family Profile



1980 1990













Population Receiving Foodstamps ( °A) )

7 \,\ /1979 1989

11.0% 12.5%9.8% 14.9%9.5% 17.5%7.9% 9.4%9.0% 12.8%

10.3% 16.7%29.0% 36.9%30.9% 53.5%

NC 77.4%

$27,857 $28,127

1995 1996

126 100324 254217 172

1.3% 1.0%

583 5621.322 1,239

$61 $615.3% 5.0%



1990

51.4% 61.1%57.3% 78.1%65.9% 87.5%

South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project 6 , 61

Corson1995 Population Estimate 4,258


Population under 20 2,263 1,693 1,753 Under 20 in 1994:White 978 634 645 41.4%American Indian 1,278 1,055 1,106Black 0 0 0 Percent of PopulationOther 7 4 2 Under 5 in 1994:




1991-95 (Combined Rate)Number % or Rate

Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) 0 0 5 11.85Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) 0 0 <3 15.41Low Birth Weight Babies (%) <3 1.7% 24 5.7%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) <3 304.88 5 304.88Births to Single Teens (%) 19 32.2% 94 22.3%Women Receiving Prenatal Care



McIntosh 0.00%McLaughlin 6.79%Smee 17.28%



ViolentInformal



62

Enrollment95/96 Fall 95

0.98% 1858.29% 458

20.83% 112

4.88% 175

Education Indicators

Children with a DisabilityFall 96 Dec. 94 Dec. 95

180 37 25470 123 118111 35 38

210 NA NA

1993

605

FY 95

0

12

1994

<30

<3

FY 96

1

29

Key


1980

27.0% ....

1990

13.6%

6 J

..w-.,4:n


Corson

Family profile


Key economic Indicators

1980

Married Couple Families 883With children 500Without children 383















1990

761432329173138

35704822

1989

42.5%51.5%65.0%33.3%41.1%53.4%61.3%66.3%83.3%

$17,442

1996

166483370

11.3%

231938$66

22.0%

1990

46.2%55.2%64.4%

South Dakota KIDS COUNT Projeci 63

BEST COPY AVAILABLE

Cusfer 1995 Population Estimate 6,675


Population under 20 1,988 1,834 1,973' Under 20 in 1994:

White 1,885 1,760 1,896 29.8%American Indian 88 62 66Black (. .) 3 3 Percent of PopulationOther 15 9 8 Under 5 in 1994:

Population under 5 484 372 376 5.7%/ 7




Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) <3 27.03 7 18.82Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) 0 0 3 43.51Low Birth Weight Babies (%) 4 5.4% 23 6.2%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) 0 0 4 197.04Births to Single Teens (%) 9 12.2% 39 10.5%Women Receiving Prenatal Care


School District:

CusterElk MountainPrivate Schools(Inc. BIA & Parochial)

Drop-Out Rate94/95 95/96

Key Education Indicators 1


2.66% 1.58% 1,226NA NA 16*NA 8.93% 50

00

*These numbers are for grades K-6 only. Grades 7-12 are contracted out.

7/.


Formal 32Violent 7

Informal 15


Correctional Facilities 2Juvenile Admissions to Drug

or Alcohol Treatment Programs 23

64

1,166 154 13319* 4 249 NA NA

1994 -11Key Safely Indicators

490 1980 1990

23 Teens not inFY 96 School & not in

Labor Force or1 Unemployed 23.6% 5.1%

7r 4,404~4111414r4401110114WSUCA4M741114,14:41,.-,,,,,:-,...larto;


Cusfer

Family Profile


key 'Economic Indicafors

1,723

1980 1990













Population Receiving Foodstamps ( %)

Females 16 and over in Labor Force ( %)


\ /

1979 1989

13.5% 12.4%17.8% 15.6%16.9% 19.1%10.2% 9.7%13.9% 14.4%18.2% 17.6%33.3% 32.1%47.5% 36.7%

NC 32.6%

$28,153 $26,714

1995 1996

34 2886 6960 46

1.3% 1.0%

139 126352 294$62 $65

5.3% 4.4%

1980 1990

51.2% 56.0%44.5% 71.1%67.0% 81.6%

South Dakota KIDS COUNT Proieci 65

Davison 1995 Population Estimate 17,823



Population under 5 1,500 1,319 1,245. 7.0%


1995 1991-95 (Combined Rate)Number % or Rate




Ethan 0.98%Mitchell 2.70%Mount Vernon 0.85%



ViolentInformal



66

<3 8.160 08 3.3%

<3 82.8521 8.6%

215 88.5%

Number % or Rate

10 7.894 20.45

72 5.7%6 99.42

111 8.8%

985 80.1%


Enrollment Children with a Disability95/96 Fall 95

2.11% 1962.84% 2,9350.79% 251

0.00% 387


200 25 282,881 323 322

258 15 16

398 NA NA

1993

122<388

FY 95

10

83

1994

1583

90

FY 96

17

55


1980 1990



Davison

Family Profilec.-



1980 1990

















1989

15.0%16.3%18.5%10.7%13.4%17.3%36.5%47.2%70.0%

$27,249

1996

111

273180

1.5%

5311,154

$616.5%

1990

58.8%79.0%83.9%

61

Dm/1980 1990

Population under 20 2,531 2,024White 2,278 1,764American Indian 249 256Black (. .) 0Other 4 4



1994 (est.)

1,9611,707

25202

461



Key half!' Indicators



Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) <3 29.41 8 20.94Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) <3 65.83 6 79.00Low Birth Weight Babies (%) <3 2.9% 20 5.2%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) <3 454.55 4 181.82Births to Single Teens (%) 7 10.3% 26 6.8%Women Receiving Prenatal Care




Bristol 1.27% 0.00% 152 148 22 14Roslyn 0.00% 0.00% 210 203 23 29Waubay 3.75% 5.75% 309 274 50 36Webster 0.91% 1.19% 682 654 79 56




Informal 20 5

Admission to JuvenileFY 95 FY 96



1980 1990


68 Souih Dakota KIDS COUNT Proieci

Day

Family Profile




1980 1990

Married Couple Families 1,968 1,659With children 962 721Without children 1,006 938



1979 1989






AFDC Basic Participation (fiscal year average)Families 50 44Recipients 157 131

Children 116 96Population Receiving AFDC (%) 2.3% 2.0%


Population Receiving Foodstamps ( %) 9.0% 7.8%




Deuel 1995 Population Estimate 4,449


Population under 20 1,727 1,298 1,290 Under 20 in 1994:White 1,707 1,285 1,280 28.7%American Indian ( .) 6 6Black ( .) 0 0 Percent of PopulationOther 20 7 4 Under 5 in 1994:





Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) 0 0 <3 7.04Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) <3 107.99 <3 43.20Low Birth Weight Babies (%) 4 7.7% 17 6.0%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) 0 0 <3 63.90Births to Single Teens (%) <3 3.8% 17 6.0%Women Receiving Prenatal Care




Deuel 0.00% 0.62% 673 650 76 78



ViolentInformal



00 00

1993 1994

9 90 09 17

70


1980 1990



Deuel

Family Profile

(,)' '`



1980














Females 16 and over in Labor Force ( %) 1980


1990

1,176517659

875037411229

..,

1989

16.6'%20.2%19.6%12.7%16.9%24.4%25.3%43.2%58.3%

$21,372

1996

614

90.3%

73185$61

4.2%

1990

49.6%70.0%70.7%

7


7 4:1;

Dewey 1995 Population Estimate 5,783


Population under 20 2,391 2,367 2,497 Under 20 in 1994:White 730 513 522 43.9%American Indian 1,648 1,845 1,966Black (. .) 4 4 Percent of PopulationOther 13 5 5 Under 5 in 1994:






Eagle Butte 3.79%Isabel 0.00%Timber Lake 1.82%




<3 7.94 13 18.11<3 55.52 3 33.316 4.8% 52 7.2%

<3 217.39 4 173.9123 18.3% 126 17.5%

87 73.1% 508 72.5%



10.94% 401 341 190 2140.00% 153 136 23 212.98% 344 317 44 45

6.38% 1,202 1,070 NA NA



Informal 0 <3




72 7


1980 1990



Dewey

Family Profile

\_. s, s ,

\ "2



1,301

1980 1990

Married Couple Families 978With children 594

827516

Without children 384 311Female Headed Families 214 365

With children 139 318Without children 75 47














South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project 7!3 73

DouglasPopulation under 20


Population under 5

1980 1990

1,430 1,2071,418 1,189

(. .) 170 0

12 1

335 315


1994 (est.)

1,1541,137

170

0

275





Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) 0 0Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) <3 110.74Low Birth Weight Babies (%) 0 0Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) 0 0Births to Single Teens (%) <3 1.9%Women Receiving Prenatal Care

(%, during first trimester) 48 90.6%


Armour 0.00% 0.79%Corsica 0.00% 0.00%



ViolentInformal



74

Number % or Rate

<3 8.16<3 44.30

7 2.9%0 07 2.9%

190 78.2%


Enrollment Children with a DisabilityFall 95 Fall 96

279 266241 244

165 134

19941993

14 110 05 <3

FY 95 FY 96

0 2

0 2

Dec. 94 Dec. 95

26 2821 20

NA NA


1980 1990


J.


Douglas

Family Profile



1980 1990

Married Couple Families 1,016 933With children 519 451Without children 497 482
















South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project 7 '0, 75

Edmunds 1995 Population Estimate 4,344


Population under 20 1,722 1,226 1,197 Under 20 in 1994:White 1,711 1,212 1,184 28.0%American Indian .) 10 10Black (...) 0 0 Percent of PopulationOther 11 4 3 Under 5 in 1994:

Population under 5 378 296 279. 6.5%




Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) <3 20.00 <3 7.60Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) 0 0 5 109.05Low Birth Weight Babies (%) <3 2.0% 12 4.6%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) 0 0 0 0Births to Single Teens (%) <3 4.0% 7 2.7%Women Receiving Prenatal Care



Bowdle 0.00%Ipswich 0.00%Edmunds Central 0.97%



0.00% 1640.91% 3600.00% 212

0.00% 100



Informal 13 9




76



156 19 16426 58 56209 12 11

57 NA NA


1980 1990


7j South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project

Edmunds

Family Profile



1980










AFDC Basic Participation (fiscal year average)

$20,568

1995

Families 4

Recipients 8

Children 5



Avg. per person $57Population Receiving Foodstamps (%) 2.6%



1990

1,120492628

623428341123

1989

23.2%28.6%32.8%18.1%27.0%26.9%27.4%41.2%

100.0%

$23,788

1996

375

0.2%

49107$56

2.5%

1990

49.6%73.1%76.8%


Fall River 1995 Population Estimate 7,089







School District:

EdgemontHot SpringsOelrichs



<3 14.71 4 10.960 0 <3 28.397 10.3% 22 6.0%

<3 224.72 <3 89.8918 26.5% 64 17.5%

41 63.1% 226 63.8%

Drop-Out Rate


Enrollment Children with a Disability94/95 95/96 Fall 95 Fall 96 Dec. 94 Dec. 95

2.21% 1.35% 265 241 32 342.26% 2.76% 1,033 1,005 151 1360.00% 2.04% 76 63 0 1

Private Schools NA NA(Inc. BIA & Parochial)


ViolentInformal



78

NA NA NA NA

1993 1994 Key Safely Indicators

27<322

FY 95

5

31

58<311

FY 96

5

23


1980

16.8%

' ; 41 .-1.11r4 41..4.1

1990

5.6%

South Dakota KIDS COUNT Proied

Fall River

Family Profile



1980 1990










AFDC Basic Participation (fiscal year average)Families 54 49Recipients 140 122

Children 99 87


Foodstamp Participation (fiscal year average)Households 201 195

Persons 499 450Avg. per person $60 $64




Soulk Dakofa KIDS COUNT Proieci g 2 79

Faulk1980 1990

Population under 20 1,085 791White 1,080 787American Indian ( .) 4Black 0 0Other 5 0



1994 (est.) .

Percent of Population740 Under 20 in 1994:737 28.8%

300

174





Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) 0 0 0 0Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) 0 0 <3 33.56Low Birth Weight Babies ( %) <3 3.0% 5 3.0%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) 0 0 3 368.10Births to Single Teens ( %) 0 0 4 2.4%Women Receiving Prenatal Care




Cresbard 0.00% 0.00% 144 243 12 15Faulkton 0.60% 0.00% 316 324 26 31



Formal <3 3Violent 0 <3

Informal 13 4





1980 1990


80 South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project8 2,

Faulk

Family Profile



1980 1990




Without children 29 12\








Recipients 7

Children 5



Avg. per person $53Population Receiving Foodstamps (%) 2.4%



1989

24.3%32.4%40.5%19.5%28.8%28.2%18.2%54.5%

100.0%

$21,526

1996

242

0.2%

2570

$502.7%

1990

45.4%66.7%71.2%

South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project 8 4 81


Population under 5

Gran,1980 1990

3,124 2,6343,078 2,605

18 13

(...) 228 14

749 588


1994 (est.)

2,6262,602

1329

551






Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) <3 20.00 3 6.24Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) 0 0 4 40.57Low Birth Weight Babies (%) 3 3.0% 22 4.6%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) 0 0 0 0Births to Single Teens (%) 5 5.0% 37 7.7%Women Receiving Prenatal Care



Big Stone City 0.00%Grant-Deuel 1.41%Milbank 2.42%



ViolentInformal





0.00% 1170.00% 2562.34% 1,239

0.00% 109

1993 1994

43 595 7

21 31

82

Key Education Indicators IChildren with a Disability


112 15 15268 56 50

1,217 127 121

110 NA NA


1980 1990



Gran,

Family Profile

/72

-1990 Total Family Households 2,264


1980 1990

Married Couple Families 2,128 2,032With children 1,177 1,021Without children 951 1,011















South Dakota KIDS COUNT Proied 86

1989

10.8%10.7%9.2%7.8%9.9%

10.0%31.5%42.1%45.0%

$28,471

1996

246644

0.8%

153359$59

4.4%

1990

55.5%83.4%81.7%

83

Gregory 1995 Population Estimate 5,112







Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) <3 16.13 3 11.19Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) 0 0 0 0Low Birth Weight Babies (%) 8 12.9% 18 6.7%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) <3 291.55 <3 116.62Births to Single Teens (%) 6 9.7% 19 7.1%Women Receiving Prenatal Care




Burke 0.56% 0.61% 301 301 20 20Gregory 1.42% 0.73% 567 566 61 54Bonesteel/Fairfax 0.82% 0.00% 257 234 35 29




Informal 44 43





1980 1990


84s ? South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project

Gregory

Family profile



1980 1990
















1989

21.6%24.7%34.3%16.0%21.2%31.6%28.3%53.6%75.0%

$21,286

1996

4210273

2.0%

142388$65

7.6%

1990

47.3%74.8%70.6%

South Dakota KIDS COUNT Proied 8 c2 85

DaakonPopulation under 20


Population under 5

1980 1990

1,035 9791,014 954

17 16

(. .) 3

4 6319 197





946 Under 20 in 1994:923 37.4%


172 6.8%


School District:

HaakonMidland

Private Schools(Inc. BIA & Parochial)

Drop-Out Rate



0 0 <3 6.450 0 <3 26.08

<3 2.7% 5 3.2%0 0 0 05 13.5% 12 7.7%

31 83.8% 121 79.1%


Enrollment Children with a Disability94/95 95/96 Fall 95

1.29% 1.29% 5600.00% 1.27% 129

NA NA NA


Formal 28Violent 0

Informal <3


Correctional Facilities 1

Juvenile Admissions to Drugor Alcohol Treatment Programs 1

86


531 28 34117 10 8

NA NA NA

1994

60

14

FY 96

0

3

r-Key Safely Indicators


1980

0.0%

1990

0.0%


liaakon

family Prorile





1980

650390260

512526281810

1990

590350240

3426

8302010















Hamlin 1995 Population Estimate 5,372

1980 1990 1994 (est.) .

Percent of PopulationPopulation under 20 1,656 1,546 1,617 Under 20 in 1994:

White 1,638 1,530 1,604 30.8%American Indian 15 5 6Black (. 1 1 Percent of PopulationOther 3 10 6 Under 5 in 1994:





Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) 0 0 <3 5.62Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) 0 0 <3 17.38Low Birth Weight Babies (%) 3 4.3% 18 5.1%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) <3 296.74 <3 118.69Births to Single Teens (%) 3 4.3% 10 2.8%Women Receiving Prenatal Care




Castlewood 2.70% 0.63% 328 338 39 44Estelline 0.00% 0.00% 240 250 26 22Hamlin 0.57% 1.91% 745 745 58 63




Informal 16 5





1980 1990



9 1;1

Hamlin

Family Profile



1980
















1990

1,186545641

845430512130

1989

16.3%19.1%24.6%11.3%15.1%25.5%16.7%17.7%30.0%

$25,362

1996

82217

0 4%

71

213$60

4.0%

1990

44.5%68.9%75.5%


...4.4.101.C.X41.110X161A' 41.


Population under 5

Hand1980 1990

1,563 1,2491,555 1,236

4(...) 2

8 7364 291



*--va Wirt440MOISSMICIPMIMMEMINMENIMONO*1



1,234 Under 20 in 1994:1,223 29.3%


262 6.2%


1995 1991-95 (Combined Rate)Number % or Rate Number % or Rate

0 0 <3 4.120 0 <3 22.353 7.5% 9 3.7%0 0 <3 67.343 7.5% 5 2.1%

30 76.9% 185 77.1%


School District: Drop-Out Rate Enrollment94/95 95/96 Fall 95 Fall 96

Miller 0.89% 1.85% 655 650Polo* 0.00% 0.00% 25 23

Private Schools 0.00% 0.00% 90 96(Inc. BIA & Parochial)

*These numbers are for grades K-6. Grades 7-12 are contracted out.


ViolentInformal




65 638 8

NA NA

1993

293

11

FY 95

0

1

1994

280

11

FY 96

2

4

Key Safety


1980

2.0%

1990

0.4%

....16.....414.ACCOSIOMINFANIMS..144"4411ZUSIRmaitl...1.0,41.,4.0 4111.41.4,1ro.i...... .....14te..4-4A.A ..-%1 tRAVININ

90 South Dakota KIDS COUNT Proieci

roillmenworamtvgrAWitimwri.,..wsz

1

Hand

-

Family Profile

i i';





1980

1,269625644

68353349

742

1990

1,087489598

733934291019

Key Economic Indicalors













1979 1989

28.4% 17.6%37.9% 23.3%39.8% 16.8%22.6% 13.4%33.3% 21.1%37.4% 17.1%19.1% 21.2%29.7% 35.3%

NC 58.3%

$20,363 $22,660

1995 1996

5 5

13 1311 11

0.3% 0.3%

56 59142 155$56 $58

3.4% 3.7%

1980 1990

37.1% 46.6%37.5% 75.6%55.2% 80.3%

South Dakota KIDS COUNT Proje1 91

Hanson1980 1990

Population under 20 1,246 992White 1,236 987American Indian (. .) 5

Black 0 0Other 10 0



1994 (est.)

959954

5

00

204






Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) 0 0 <3 9.30Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) 0 0 <3 27.93Low Birth Weight Babies (%) <3 4.4% 14 6.5%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) 0 0 0 0Births to Single Teens (%) 0 0 4 1.9%Women Receiving Prenatal Care



Hanson 0.56% 0.00%Emery 0.00% 0.00%


92


Enrollment Children with a DisabilityFall 95 Fall 96

344 329199 204

NA NA


Formal <3 6Violent 0 <3

Informal <3 17




9

Dec. 94 Dec. 95

33 4020 17

NA NA


1980 1990



Hanson

Family Profile


Key Economic.Indicalors






1980 1990


Female Headed Families 41 37With children 18 21

Without children 23 16Male Headed Families 28 28

With children 2 8


1979 1989

31.3% 16.8%42.9% 23.6%39.9% 22.2%24.2% 11.4%33.5% 18.6%35.1% 18.4%41.5% 21.4%77.8% 44.4%

NC 0.0%

$19,492 $28,232



1995 1996

Families 3 2

Recipients 5 6

Children 3 5

Population Receiving AFDC ( %) 0.2% 0.2%


Persons 93 70

Avg. per person $56 $60




Sough Dakola KIDS COUNT Pro:4d9 93

.A.MOVEMWSOCAINFOr-ag'

Hardint 1995 Population Estimate 1,542


Population under 20 580 586 541 Under 20 in 1994:White 562 574 530 35.1%American Indian (. .) 7 8Black 0 3 3 Percent of PopulationOther 18 2 0 Under 5 in 1994:




Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) 0 0 0 0Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) 0 0 0 0Low Birth Weight Babies (%) <3 5.6% 4 3.6%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) 0 0 0 0Births to Single Teens (%) 0 0% <3 0.90%Women Receiving Prenatal Care


in,-.1.161F,


Harding County 0.57% 0.59%


o 6.6


364

30



Informal <3 0



or Alcohol Treatment Programs 0 0ABIPIMENIMMOIMMIIIIIMPIIIIMMINIMUIWAIMAPC4044NOS04014:091110WWW.M.4,M410,

94

360 20 25

42 NA NA


1980 1990



Harding.

Family Profile

foZit .11


Key Economic Indicafon

1980 1990

















1979 1989

23.8% 18.9%32.2% 20.5%27.3% 21.8%19.1% 18.0%20.4% 18.6%31.4% 22.2%0.0% 62.5%0.0% 76.9%

NC 80.0%

$23,968 $23,333

South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project9J

1995 1996

1 2

2 42 3

0.1% 0.3%

13 12

40 35$64 $51

2.6% 2.3%

1980 1990

35.5% 58.1%33.6% 60.9%46.3% 81.3%

95

Hughes 1995 Population Estimate 15,537


Population under 20 4,905 4,728 4,965 Under 20 in 1994:White 4,374 4,202 4,404 31.9%American Indian 491 477 516Black (...) 12 17 Percent of PopulationOther 40 37 28 Under 5 in 1994:





Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) <3 4.12 16 13.94Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) <3 28.37 <3 5.67Low Birth Weight Babies (%) 4 1.6% 45 3.9%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) 3 304.88 7 142.28Births to Single Teens (%) 21 8.6% 110 9.6%Women Receiving Prenatal Care



School District: Drop-Out Rate Enrollment Children with a DisabiliV94/95 95/96 Fall 95 Fall 96 Dec. 94 Dec. 95

Harrold 0.00% 0.00% 117 129 16 13Pierre 3.25% 2.78% 2,928 2,894 334 374




Informal 208 206




1980 1990


96South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project9:s?

Iluehes

Family Profile








1980 1990




1979 1989

7.1% 10.4%7.1% 13.9%8.0% 20.5%4.9% 8.2%6.7% 11.3%7.3% 15.4%

22.8% 32.9%29.0% 37.8%

NC 54.2%

$34,331 $33,863



1995 1996

Families 100 82Recipients 247 209Children 180 158






BEST COPY AVAILABLESouih Dakota KIDS COUNT Proied 97

...0444,114147:144,4,1411,112M' -

Huichinson1980 1990

14111M4SUIIIIIMIRSIMIa



2,192 Under 20 in 1994:2,166 27.0%

15

Population under 20 2,780 2,232White 2,754 2,205American Indian 11 13Black (. -) 0 0Other 15 14 11

Population under 5 637 520 480

ilaw stall

Number

Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) 0Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) <3Low Birth Weight Babies (%) <3Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) 0Births to Single Teens (%) 3Women Receiving Prenatal Care



Key llealfh Indicators

1995 1991-95 (Combined Rate)% or Rate

060.202.3%

03.5%

77.9%


Freeman 0.00% 0.55%Menno 0.72% 0.00%Parkston 1.32% 0.25%Tripp-Delmont 1.25% 3.07%


Number % or Rate

<3 4.464 48.16

17 3.8%<3 40.9011 2.5%

317 71.4%

ducalion ndicafors


489331728315



Informal 17 11




98

86

448 80 77331 48 35726 77 85308 44 30

98 NA NA

1980 1990



Hutchinson

Family Profile

NMI



1980 1990

Married Couple Families 2,408 2,109With children 1,114 860Without children 1,294 1,249










1995 1996

Families 14 11





Females 16 and over in Labor Force ( %) 1980 1990


501PaWlprfilikettiTatttiTinwiteu f..47


Hyde 1995 Population Estimate 1,675


Population under 20 686 468 457 Under 20 in 1994:White 629 448 437 27.5%American Indian 55 20 20Black (. .) 0 0 Percent of PopulationOther 2 0 0 Under 5 in 1994:





Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) 0 0 <3 10.20Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) 0 0 0 0Low Birth Weight Babies (%) 0 0% <3 1.0%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) 0 0 <3 240.96Births to Single Teens (%) <3 5.3% 6 6.1%Women Receiving Prenatal Care




Hyde 0.56% 0.00% 345 333 39 47


675"



Informal 2 14





1980 1990



Hyde

Family Profile









1980 1990

fvlarried Couple Families 484 420With children 245 200Without children 239 220

Female Headed Families 43 24With children 16 14Without children 27 '10


1979 1989

23.2% 16.5%27.8% 21.1%25.6% 23.9%18.8% 12.9%28.8% 17.2%23.8% 25.8%16.3% 30.4%35.0% 77.8%

NC 66.7%

$23,072 $25,081

1995 1996







South Dakota KIDS COUNT Proied 101

JacksonPopulation under 20


Population under 5

1980 1990

1,461 1,082642 472815 607(. .) 0

4 3367 284

-,44okg-itionsaitesaugilmasimatowats


1994 (est.) .

.0111W,1112.71,.

Percent of Population1,132 Under 20 in 1994:

481 39.2%649

0 Percent of Population

1995Number

Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) <3Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) <3Low Birth Weight Babies (%) <3Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) <3

Births to Single Teens (%) <3Women Receiving Prenatal Care


School District:

Kadoka


2 Under 5 in 1994:283 9.8%


% or Rate1991-95 (Combined Rate)Number % or Rate

35.09 6 21.74124.53 <3 49.81

1.8% 9 3.3%429.18 <3 85.84

3.5% 34 12.3%

75.4% 181 66.5%

Drop-Out Rate Enrollment


Children with a Disability94/95 95/96 Fall 95 Fall 96 Dec. 94 Dec. 95

1.52% 0.53% 409 416 41 61

19.13% 14.91% 364 344 NA NA



Informal 9 16



102

10 )

Safely Indicators

1980 1990



Jackson

Family Profile





1980

637380257

956530341717

1990

528278250

957124574611

Key iEconomic Indicators








1995 1996







South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project 10: 103

A:tt--KtialikNIC.Ilhafte1141633911111011,1010... tPso at

Jerauld'....".N.A1.14141110W403%634110=-Midete;.!....


1980 1990 1994 (est.) .

Percent of PopulationPopulation under 20 929 672 661 Under 20 in 1994:

White 927 665 654 27.6%American Indian (. ) 3 3Black 0 0 0 Percent of PopulationOther 2 4 4 Under 5 in 1994:




_


0 00 0

<3 4.5%0 0

<3 4.5%

18 85.7%


Alpena 0.00% 0.00%Wessington Springs 0.79% 0.85%


Key !kaki% Indicators


<3 16.810 08 6.7%0 06 5.0%

94 81.0%

Key iducalion Indicators.

Enrollment Children with a DisabilityFall 95 Fall 96 Dec. 94 Dec. 95-

117 113 15 16434 420 45 47

NA NA NA NA



Informal 0 <3




104 10


1980 1990


.t:,34.-


Family Profile



1980 1990












1995

3

64

0.3%

1996

243

0.2%





South Dakota KIDS COUNT Proied 1 Cs105


Population under 5

Jones1980 1990

473 400465 398

(- ) 20 08 0

108 102

Number

Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) 0Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) 0Low Birth Weight Babies (%) 3Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) 0Births to Single Teens ( %) <3Women Receiving Prenatal Care



1994 (est.) .

Percent of Population393 Under 20 in 1994:391 30.0%

2

00

103



1995% or Rate


0 <3 15.630 <3 67.34

20.0% 4 6.3%0 0 0

6.7% <3 3.1%

84.6% 53 85.5%

Key Education Ind katoi


Jones County 0.00% 0.00% 283 284 46 35


66" Oo

1993 1994 ey Safely IndicatorsJuvenile Offense Referrals

FormalViolent

<30

60 1980 1990

Informal 3 3 Teens not in

Admission to Juvenile FY 95 FY 96 School & not inLabor Force or

Correctional Facilities 1 0 Unemployed 11.9% 8.2%Juvenile Admissions to Drug

or Alcohol Treatment Programs 0 2.q,..71111PIAV444411P4A4 IdiVINPAIIM11.0,-Wie,hsir 41,


Family Prorde


Key Economic Indicaiors






1980 1990




1979 1989

18.3% 15.1%20.0% 19.1%20.8% 23.5%17.1% 11.4%18.5% 14.0%23.9% 16.2%37.0% 30.8%50.0% 40.0%

NC 50.0%

$23,658 $25,125



1995 1996

Families 2 1







South Dakota KIDS COUNT Proiecf 107

1g .;tagl60,1?,41 aag Vagiag ..ag

ury 1995 Population Estimate 5,745


Population under 20 1,929 1,651 1,609 Under 20 in 1994:White 1,914 1,644 1,603 27.9%American Indian .) 3 3

Black (...) 0 0 Percent of PopulationOther 15 4 3 Under 5 in 1994:




1991-95 (Combined Rate)Number °A) or Rate

Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) 0 0 <3 3.23Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) 0 0 <3 32.21

Low Birth Weight Babies (%) <3 1.4% 11 3.5%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) <3 291.55 3 174.93Births to Single Teens ( %) <3 1.4% 7 2.3%Women Receiving Prenatal Care


aag--ga


Arlington 0.00% 0.99%DeSmet 0.00% 0.00%Lake Preston 0.67% 1.96%




403392282



Informal 14 5




108

21

emu, igga gegaggrAgmaggajm =i,gaNiataligagagMaaVagfaaal."go.,.*0111.1^Sgli.,,,Wg.kg4f44garaa

396 40 39394 40 41

275 25 26

21 NA NA


1980 1990


Lgg9a1taL1g..gaag4arz,MgAigragoalAWAIROMMIX4vangaawattiaasnia4g-agg

1. South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project

Kingsbury

Family Profile








1980 1990




1979 1989

20.1% 13.5%27.6% 17.8%27.0% 18.3%15.0% 10.4%21.1% 16.2%24.6% 16.3%25.8% 16.0%44.9% 25.0%

NC 28.6%

$21,785 $25,800



1995 1996

Families 10 8

Recipients 29 21

Children 22 17


Foodstamp Participation (fiscal year average)Households 75 66Persons 209 168

Avg. per person $57 $53Population Receiving Foodstamps ( %) 3.6% 2.9%




1 it (,


Population under 5

Lake1980 1990

3,323 3,2053,284 3,164

19 17

(...) 520 19

819 707



-...,.413'-:jKtie.4' qe.ii1


1994 (est.) .

Percent of Population3,283 Under 20 in 1994:3,253 30.6%

175

8Percent of PopulationUnder 5 in 1994:

6861 6.4%




Chester 0.00%Lake Central 1.26%Rutland 0.00%Oldham-Ramona 3.64%



ViolentInformal



110

<3 19.61<3 44.25

7 6.9%0 08 7.8%

86 86.9%

Number % or Rate

3 4.764 35.40

25 4.0%<3 48.7838 6.0%

537 87.5%

Key Education Indicators 1


1.05% 3641.34% 1,5351.49% 1291.77% 215

0.00% 105


384 49 441,536 125 115

135 7 5205 23 25

99 NA NA

1993

420

34

FY 95

4

25

1994

77<342

FY 96

2

24

Key Safety


Indicators

1980

5.2%

1990

1.4%

South Dakota KIDS COUNT Proied

Lake

family Profile


Key Econom ic Indcafors

1980 1990





All Persons 15.0% 10.4%

Related children under 18 16.2% 11.6%


All Families 11.9% 8.3%



Female Headed Families 30.2% 38.1%


Related children under 5 NC 83.1%




1995 1996

Families 46 39

Recipients 122 100

Children 80 66



Persons 614 565




Total 42.8% 54.6%

With children under 6 49.2% 67.8%

With children 6-17 65.9% 86.3%


Lawrence 1995 Population Estimate 22,452




Number

Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) 3Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) 0Low Birth Weight Babies (%) 17Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) 0Births to Single Teens (%) 25Women Receiving Prenatal Care


School District:

Lead-DeadwoodSpearfish



11.10% 1.67%1.19% 1.64%

NA 33.33%


ViolentInformal




1995% or Rate


12.05 14 10.420 3 13.42

6.8% 73 5.4%0 5 57.37

10.0% 110 8.2%

87.8% 1,130 86.3%



1,455 1,347 114 1122,380 2,393 244 252

2 2 NA NA

1993 1994

94 1127 5

104 102

FY 95 FY 96

13 15

137 102,,,,...-411.,1-114370C,VAIN.V.V.ari, V.V71....0tf1144,11al.e.a, zing*

112

Key Safely Indicators]

1980 1990


INIMMIUMONSW-MICPARP.Maill,....4.14,44.4443101401M4**


Lawrence

family Profile




All Persons. Related children under 18

Related children under 5All Families

Related children under 18Related children under 5



1980 1990




1:2;)

1979 1989

14.3% 14.0%14.5% 14.5%15.0% 19.4%10.3% 8.9%14.2% 13.6%16.7% 18.4%40.8% 36.9%54.6% 51.5%

NC 66.3%

$27,817 $31,185



1995 1996

Families 110 114







South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project1

113

Lincoln 1995 Population Estimate 16,666




Health indicators



Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) 0 0 <3 1.74Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) <3 26.06 7 36A8Low Birth Weight Babies (%) 15 6.0% 69 6.0%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) <3 98.33 5 98.33Births to Single Teens (%) 17 6.7% 61 5.3%Women Receiving Prenatal Care

(%, during first trimester). 224 90.0% 1,012 90.3%

ey Education Indicators




Canton 1.42% 1.00% 1,053 1,043 147 149Harrisburg 1.00% 0.33% 692 713 81 73Lennox 1.52% 1.73% 1,529 1,601 194 185



ViolentInformal



1993 1994

64 1154 2

85 120

FY 95 FY 96

0 2

12 2441114,14144.448:111i


1980 1990



Lincoln

Family Profile








1980 1990




1979 1989

11.0% 6.2%10.7% 7.2%11.1% 6.6%9.8% 4.6%

10.4% 5.4%11.5% 5.7%

34.0% 16.3%34.4% 23.4%

NC 46.9%

$28,893 $32,490




1995

419769

0.6%

1996

338762

0.5%





South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project 1151i

Lyman 1995 Population Estimate 3,779


Population under 20 1,474 1,312 1,363 Under 20 in 1994:White 972 741 761 36.4%American Indian 500 568 600Black (. .) 1 1 Percent of PopulationOther 2 2 1 Under 5 in 1994:


Key Kea 1fh Indicators



Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) 0 0 3 8.93Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) 0 0 <3 20.64Low Birth Weight Babies (%) 5 6.8% 24 7.2%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) 0 0 4 281.69Births to Single Teens (%) 14 18.9% 55 16.4%Women Receiving Prenatal Care(%, during first trimester) 59 81.9% 235 71.2%



Lyman 0.97% 2.73% 406 425 63 58



ViolentInformal



1993 1994

8 2<3 017 14

116

Safely Indicators

1980 1990



Lyman

family Profile






1980 1990

810 755451 377359 378115 12573 8842 3740 60

9 4431 16

\ /Percent Below Poverty Statistics 1979 1989







1995 1996







12.0South Dakota KIDS COUNT Proied 117

McCook 1995 Population Estimate 5,824


Population under 20 2,128 1,700 1,726 Under 20 in 1994:White 2,117 1,684 1,712 29.8%American Indian (. .) 11 11

Black .) 0 0 Percent of PopulationOther 11 5 3 Under 5 in 1994:


Key Ilea 1111 Indicators



Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) 0 0 <3 5.31Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) <3 81.10 <3 32.44Low Birth Weight Babies (%) 3 3.7% 14 3.7%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) 0 0 <3 52.36Births to Single Teens (%) 6 7.3% 26 6.9%Women Receiving Prenatal Care




Canistota 0.85% 0.00% 230 244 35 40Montrose 0.00% 0.00% 237 271 36 35Bridgewater 0.00% 0.00% 205 187 28 26McCook Central 1.19% 0.00% 427 414 49 56




Informal 10 5





ey Salety Indicators

1980 1990


McCook

Family Profile








1980 1990




-s-

1979 1989

19.0% 11.8%21.1% 12.7%22.0% 18.1%16.6% 9.3%21.5% 11.4%22.3% 18.1%18.7% 29.0%28.6% 32.7%

NC 100.0%

$23,447 $25,109



1995 1996








McPherson 1995 Population Estimate 3,036


Population under 20 1,150 783 739 Under 20 in 1994:White 1,145 780 736 24.2%American Indian 0 1 1

Black 0 0 0 Percent of PopulationOther 5 2 2 Under 5 in 1994:





Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) <3 38.46 <3 5.95Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) 0 0 <3 34.42Low Birth Weight Babies (%) <3 7.7% 8 4.8%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) <3 552.49 <3 110.50Births to Single Teens (%) 0 0 8 4.8%Women Receiving Prenatal Care




Eureka 0.00% 0.00% 285 280 41 30Leo la 0.00% 0.00% 265 254 27 24




Informal <3 4




120


1980 1990



McPherson

Family Profile





1980

1,09146262964283626

917

1990

905324581

46182822

715














, \ /1979 1989

27.2% 21.5%34.9% 24.8%30.0% 30.8%20.8% 15.8%26.0% 22.6%30.3% 28.4%32.8% 17.1%35.7% 23.1%

NC 20.0%

$18,020 $19,180

1995 1996

1 1

3 3

2 20.1% 0.1%

48 48107 107$53 $48

3.5% 3.5%

1980 1990

37.7% 42.6%43.1% 70.3%61.5% 75.1%

2$South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project 121

Marshall 1995 Population Estimate 4,714


Population under 20 1,719 1,368 1,351 Under 20 in 1994:White 1,562 1,228 1,210 28.3%American Indian (...) 136 138Black 0 1 1 Percent of PopulationOther 157 3 2 Under 5 in 1994:



1995NuMber % or Rate


Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) 0 0 <3 3.77Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) 0 0 0 0Low Birth Weight Babies (%) <3 3.8% 6 2.3%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) 0 0 3 221.40Births to Single Teens ( %) <3 1.9% 13 4.9%Women Receiving Prenatal Care(%, during first trimester) 38 76.0% 176 68.0%



Britton 1.33% 0.00% 500 524 39 46Langford 0.00% 0.95% 236 257 18 19Veblen 0.00% 1.30% 162 134 27 23



Formal 17 37Violent <3 <3

Informal 18 14




Key Safely Indicators_

1980 1990



Marshall

Family Profile


, =


1980 1990









AFDC/Foodstamps Participation 1995




Population Receiving Foodstamps ( %) 4.8%



1989

17.7%18.5%18.4%12.5%15.2%19.2%29.1%37.0%77.8%

$21,219

1996

184936

1.0%

79229$60

4.9%

1990

46.0%63.8%80.8%

12;7South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project 123

Meade 1995 Population !skate 23,084







Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) <3 2.16 13 5.85Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) <3 17.55 12 42.12Low Birth Weight Babies (%) 32 6.9% 99 4.5%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) <3 57.67 5 57.67Births to Single Teens (%) 24 5.2% 116 5.2%Women Receiving Prenatal Care(%, during first trimester) 355 78.4% 1,790 82.0%





Meade 3.66% 3.21% 3,092 3,048 308 264Faith 0.00% 0.00% 222 219 23 24




Informal 65 67



124

Key Saki,/ Indicators

1980 1990


1 ' South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project

Meade

Family Profile




1980 1990







1979 1989

10.6% 10.4%11.3% 12.4%12.8% 12.8%

8.0% 9.0%9.8% 11.7%

10.8% 13.3%26.3% 32.0%33.6% 38.7%

NC 55.4%

$27,862 $27,156Median Family Income

AFDC/Foodstamps Participation 1995 1996


Recipients 221 197

Children 156 135



Persons 945 917

Avg. per person $61 $64Population Receiving Foodstamps (%) 4.1% 4.0%

1980 1990Females 16 and over in Labor Force (%)



Me kik 1995 Population Estimate 2,002


Population under 20 903 820 815 Under 20 in 1994:White 448 328 317 39.0%American Indian 451 489 496Black 0 1 1 Percent of PopulationOther 4 2 1 Under 5 in 1994:


Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births)Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14)Low Birth Weight Babies (%)Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19)Births to Single Teens (%)Women Receiving Prenatal Care(%, during first trimester)

School District:

White RiverWood




<3 22.22 4 18.870 0 <3 32.844 8.9% 9 4.2%

<3 578.03 <3 231.2111 24.4% 47 22.2%

32 74.4% 160 77.3%

Drop-Out Rate

- 1-



11.96% 4.10% 445 433 63 670.00% 0.00% 55* 60* 6 6

NA NA NA NA NA NA

*These numbers are for grades K-8. Grades 9-12 are contracted out.



Informal 7 23



,,....1.146.4,e.,..*14,,,,....341,..

1261 2 5

Safely Indicators

1980 1990



Me !kW

Family Profile

Q-\\



1980 1990





...











Persons 546 566Avg. per person $69 $72




Sough Dakota KIDS COUNT Proied127

Miner 1995 Population Estimate 3,064

1980 1990 1994 (est.)

Population under 20 1,110 942 888White 1,109 941 888American Indian 0 0 0Black 0 0 0Other 1 1 0

Population under 5 293 227 204



Key Ilealfh Indicators



Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) 0 0 <3 5.78Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) 0 0 <3 27.66Low Birth Weight Babies (%) 0 0 5 2.9%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) 0 0 <3 110.50Births to Single Teens (%) <3 3.2% 13 7.5%Women Receiving Prenatal Care(%, during first trimester) 25 80.6% 143 83.1%




Howard 1.43% 2.15% 611Carthage NA NA 19*Private Schools NA NA NA(Inc. BIA & Parochial)

These numbers are for grades K-6 only. Grades 7-12 are contracted out.



Informal 20 17



581 81 8716* 4 4NA NA NA


1980 1990


128Dakota KIDS COUNT Proluf

Miner

Family Profile



888




1980

971433538421428411526

1990

795356439

593227341123/,-










Foodstamp Participation (fiscal year average)Households 77 74Persons 210 201




South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project 13;: 129

Minnehaha 1995 Population Estimate 135,641




Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births)Child Death Rate (per 1 00,000,age 1-14)Low Birth Weight Babies (%)Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19)Births to Single Teens (%)Women Receiving Prenatal Care(%, during first trimester)

School District:



18 8.705 18.56

129 6.2%4 48.08

142 6.9%

1,818 89.4%

Drop-Out Rate94/95

Baltic 1.69%Brandon Valley 1.23%Dell Rapids 0.00%Garretson 0.45%Sioux Falls 1.84%Tri-Valley 0.73%West Central 0.62%Private Schools 0.07%(Inc. BIA & Parochial)

Number % or Rate

EnrollmentFall 9695/96 Fall 95

1.70% 3400.90% 2,2451.18% 7370.45% 4722.61% 17,9200.24% 8181.19% 1,0980.41% 3,104


Formal 1,114 1,308Violent 32 48

Informal 550 492



130

85 8.2426 19.30

612 5.9%

22 52.89566 6.5%

8,987 89.1%


-4


337 31 282,280 191 198

775 92 99492 41 41

17,968 2,530 2,448818 86 70

1,127 123 1223,197 NA NA


1980 1990


--4444+ 4. 4, 4, 44-44414,444 44 -4, r


Minnehaha

Family Profile



1980 1990


Female Headed Families 2,963 4,209With children 1,999 3,048Without children 964 1,161

Male Headed Families 595 1,115With children 242 607

31,928 Without children 353 508

,,-,--,-,A, ) g,





Median Family Income $34,417 %34,286


AFDC Basic Participation (fiscal year average)Families 709 643Recipients 1,777 1,601

Children 1,211 1,109Population Receiving AFDC ( %) 1.3% 1.2%






13..

Moody 1995 Population Estimate 6,616


Population under 20 2,238 2,138 2,174 Under 20 in 1994:White 2,063 1,880 1,903 32.8%American Indian 162 244 258Black .) 2 2 Percent of PopulationOther 13 12 11 Under 5 in 1994:





Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) 0 0 <3 2.54Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) <3 62.34 <3 24.94Low Birth Weight Babies (%) 3 3.9% 18 4.6%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) 0 0 <3 91.53Births to Single Teens (%) 7 9.2% 33 8.4%Women Receiving Prenatal Care(%, during first trimester) 68 91.9% 342 87.9%

School District:

FlandreauColman-EganHermansonPrivate Schools(Inc. BIA & Parochial)

Drop-Out Rate Enrollment94/95 95/96 Fall 95

3.43% 2.16% 9501.40% 1.32% 362

NA NA NA22.84% 22.81% 480


ViolentInformal



132 13 ;

1993 1994

42 33<3 228 25



938 97 87354 50 46NA 1 1

508 NA NA


1980 1990



Moody

Family Profile



1980 1990





v.>













South Dakota KIDS COUNT ProiecfX13

133

Penninelon 1995 Population Estimate 87,304


Population under 20 24,389 26,059 28,056 Under 20 in 1994:White 21,738 22,126 23,867 32.4%American Indian 1,894 2,861 3,183Black 360 536 544 Percent of PopulationOther 397 536 462 Under 5 in 1994:





Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) 17 12.83 76 10.45Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) 6 31.25 33 34.38Low Birth Weight Babies (%) 95 7.2% 496 6.8%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) 3 54.61 19 69.18Births to Single Teens ( %) 151 11.4% 729 10.0%Women Receiving Prenatal Care(%, during first trimester) 1,018 78.2% 5,400 75.9%

School District:

DouglasHill CityNew UnderwoodRapid CityWall



3.22% 3.45%1.90% 1.94%3.08% 5.04%5.84% 7.25%0.00% 0.96%

0.63% 2.90%


ViolentInformal



134

Enrollment


Children with a DisabilityFall 95 Fall 96 Dec. 94 Dec. 95

2,780564257

14,430430

1,295

1993 1994

1,065 1,10249 53

221 155

FY 95 FY 96

25 46

451 258

2,521 362 362609 42 43267 18 23

14,181 1,285 1,288424 45 47

1,361 NA NA


1980 1990


13 South Dakota KIDS COUNT project

Penninion

Family Profile



1980 1990


Female Headed Families 2,187 3,121With children 1,628 2,407Without children 559 714








AFDC Basic Participation (fiscal year average)Families 936 881Recipients 2,571 2,375Children 1,827 1,700






South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project 131) 135

Perkins 1995 Population Estimate 3,703


Population under 20 1,464 1,070 1,024 Under 20 in 1994:White 1,432 1,040 992 27.2%American Indian 26 23 25Black 0 3 7 Percent of PopulationOther 6 4 0 Under 5 in 1994:





Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) 0 0 <3 4.69Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) 0 0 0 0Low Birth Weight Babies (%) 3 8.1% 9 4.2%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) <3 492.61 <3 197.04Births to Single Teens (%) 3 8.1% 11 5.2%Women Receiving Prenatal Care(%, during first trimester) 26 76.5% 160 77.7%

School District: Drop-Out Rate



Bison 1.69% 0.87% 206 192 16 15Lemmon 2.61% 0.00% 539 509 49 57Northwest 0.00% 0.00% 33 30 6 8

Private Schools NA(Inc. BIA & Parochial)

1993

NA NA

1994

NA NA NA

Key Safely IndicatorsJuvenile Offense Referrals

FormalViolent

11<3

11<3 1980 1990

Informal 13 14 Teens not in

Admission to Juvenile FY 95 FY 96 School & not inLabor Force or

Correctional Facilities 0 1 Unemployed 3.9% 2.8%Juvenile Admissions to Drugor Alcohol Treatment Programs 4 10


Perkins

Family Profile


1980 1990











AFDC/Foodstamps Participation


Population Receiving AFDC ( %)





, , )

' _Y

1979 1989

19.4% 15.2%24.2% 20.8%31.4% 27.5%15.9% 12.9%21.4% 21.6%25.7% 31.8%25.0% 32.5%30.6% 40.3%

NC 84.2%

$25,222 $24,651

1995 1996

10 1026 2716 18

0.7% 0.7%

90 88157 173$55 $55

4.2% 4.7%

1980 1990

46.8% 58.3%46.0% 82.7%69.5% 84.7%

South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project 1371 4 0

Poffer40.244134:1.,



Population under 20 1,227 927 898 Under 20 in 1994:White 1,210 911 885 29.2%American Indian .) 12 13Black 0 0 0 Percent of PopulationOther 17 4 0 Under 5 in 1994:




1991-95 (Combined Rate)Number `)/0 or Rate

Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) 0 0 0 0Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) 0 0 3 85.59Low Birth Weight Babies (%) <3 3.2% 4 2.4%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) 0 0 <3 102.56Births to Single Teens (%) 3 9.7% 8 4.8%Women Receiving Prenatal Care(%, during first trimester) 27 90.0% 132 81.5%

School District:

GettysburgHoven



1.39% 0.93%0.00% 0.00%

0.00% 0.00%

Enrollment

_Key Educalion Indicators

Children with a DisabilityFall 95 Fall 96 Dec. 94 Dec. 95

393 388 32 24188 183 23 24

78 76 NA NA



Informal 24 19



138

14


1980 1990



potter

Family Profile



875




1980

897473424

573522371819

1990

793358435

60362422

913

,-(_,,

-zs , c.;-- /













South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project 142, 139

Roberts 1995 Population Estimate 9,949


Population under 20 3,901 3,213 3,214 Under 20 in 1994:White 2,739 2,087 2,066 32.8%American Indian 1,157 1,114 1,140Black (...) 0 0 Percent of PopulationOther 5 12 8 Under 5 in 1994:





Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 five births) <3 6.29 11 13.35Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) <3 42.92 5 42.92Low Birth Weight Babies (%) 4 2.5% 51 6.2%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) 0 0 6 165.06Births to Single Teens (%) 28 17.6% 130 15.8%Women Receiving Prenatal Care(%, during first trimester) 99 63.5% 482 60.4%



Rosholt 0.00% 0.00% 193 200 19 17Summit 0.00% 0.00% 151 156 20 24Wilmot 0.00% 0.00% 343 348 44 40Sisseton 3.48% 4.89% 1,280 1,278 154 183




Informal 36 19




1980 1990


140 Sold Dakota KIDS COUNT Project

14 I

Robert

Family Profile



1980 1990
















South Dakota KIDS COUNT Proied 1'.

1989

26.4%37.1%39.8%19.3%29.3%32.3%52.8%61.5%64.6%

$22,189

1996

182497381

5.0%

3971,230

$6712.4%

1990

51.1%68.2%78.9%

141

Sanborn 1995 Population Estimate 2,798


Population under 20 1,001 874 851 Under 20 in 1994:White 921 874 851 30.7%American Indian ( .) 0Black (...) 0 0 Percent of PopulationOther 80 0 0 Under 5 in 1994:





Infant .Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) 0 0 0 0Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) 0 0 3 89.29Low Birth Weight Babies (%) 0 0 8 4.8%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) 0 0 0 0Births to Single Teens ( %) 3 10.0% 6 3.6%Women Receiving Prenatal Care(%, during first trimester) 26 86.7% 120 73.2%


Woonsocket 0.54% 0.57%Artesian-Letcher 0.00% 0.00%



ViolentInformal



142



303346

NA

288 39 31335 47 47

NA NA NA

1993

6<3<3

FY 95

1

6

1994

5<3<3

FY 96

0

7

ey Safety Indicators


1980

6.5% ....

1990

19.2%


Sanborn

Family Profile


I Key Economic Indicaiors

1980 1990



Male Headed Families 39 31









Recipients 17 16

Children 11 10



Persons 97 80




South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project 14 r: 143

Shannon 1995 Population Estimate 11,675

1980 1990 1994 (est.) .


White 175 75 90 50.6%American Indian 5,691 4,780 5,612Black (...) 2 4 Percent of PopulationOther 5 8 1 Under 5 in 1994:



School District:



Shannon County 0.00% 0.00%




8 26.58 42 24.323 83.99 10 55.99

20 6.7% 117 6.8%3 281.69 16 300.47

59 19.6% 358 20.7%

182 61.7% 1,032 60.8%



1,007 999 230 245

2,686 2,869 NA NA



Informal 0 0



144 14 '


1980 1990



Shannon

Family Profile



1980 1990










AFDC Basic Participation (fiscal year average)Families 866Recipients 2,575Children 1,945


Foodstamp Participation (fiscal year average)Households 1,268Persons 4,654Avg. per person $70




1989

63.1%69.5%70.4%56.9%62.7%61.5%68.4%72.4%70.3%

$11,502

1996

8252,4621,869

21.1%

1,2744,654

$7239.9%

1990

44.9%38.8%57.5%

/


Spink 1995 Population Estimate 7,844


'opulation under 20 2,776 2,352 2,314 Under 20 in 1994:White 2,732 2,328 2,292 29.4%American Indian 37 21 21Black 0 0 0 Percent of PopulationOther 7 3 1 Under 5 in 1994:



School District:




Conde 0.00% 2.33%Do land 0.00% 2.17%Northwestern 0.00% 2.00%Redfield 0.75% 0.49%Tulare 2.70% 2.33%


0 0 3 5.870 0 <3 11.595 5.5% 26 5.1%0 0 4 151.803 3.3% 25 4.9%

66 74.2% 353 71.3%



95 101 16 15209 233 26 34319 313 22 20808 806 100 101190 181 14 17

30 0 NA NA



Informal 17 24




146

14

Safely IndiTaiorS

1980 1990



Spink

Family Profile



2,088

1980 1990

Married Couple Families 2,126 1,850With children 1,022 883Without children 1,104 967















South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project 16.

1989

18.7%26.0%25.6%13.0%20.9%21.9%39.9%54.6%58.3%

$24,507

1996

225736

0.7%

126325$55

4.1%

1990

49.7%64.0%70.3%

147

Stanley 1995 Population Estimate 2,823


Population under 20 963 839 927 Under 20 in 1994:White 924 760 837 34.6%American Indian (...) 76 89Black 0 1 1 Percent of PopulationOther 39 2 0 Under 5 in 1994:


Number

Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) <3Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) 0Low Birth Weight Babies (%) <3Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) 0Births to Single Teens (%) <3Women Receiving Prenatal Care(%, during first trimester) 28


Key Ilealth Indicators

1995% or Rate


35.71 3 16.850 <3 32.89

3.6% <3 1.1%0 <3 101.01

3.6% 16 9.0%

100.0% 153 86.4%



Stanley County 0.00% 2.31% 598

Private Schools NA NA NA(Inc. BIA & Parochial)

00


Formal 3 5Violent <3 <3

Informal 38 23



148

15

636 94 69

NA NA NA


1980 1990



Stanley

Family Profile



1980 1990











Recipients 29Children 24






1989

12.4%15.2%

. 18.7%10.9%15.1%19.4%35.4%41.3%60.7%

$26,351

1996

72117

0.7%

31

75$66

2.7%

1990

67.6%76.7%87.4%

South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project 15 ?, 149


1980 1990 1994 (est.) Percent of PopulationPopulation under 20 709 477 468 Under 20 in 1994:

White 699 468 459 30.0%American Indian 8 9 9Black (...) 0 0 Percent of PopulationOther 2 0 0 Under 5 in 1994:


Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births)Child Death Rate (per 1 00,000,age 1-14)Low Birth Weight Babies (%)Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19)Births to Single Teens (%)Women Receiving Prenatal Care(%, during first trimester)



0 00 00 00 0

<3 7.1%

11 78.6%

Number % or Rate

<3 11.110 04 4.4%0 06 6.7%

76 87.4%



Agar 0.00% 0.00% 74 67 3 5Sully Buttes 0.00% 4.60% 349 351 39 41




Informal 12 6




1980 1990


150South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project15

Sully

Family Profile

1990 Total Family Househoalds 462


1980 1990










AFDC Basic Participation (fiscal year average)Families 4Recipients 9

Children 8


Foodstamp Participation (fiscal year average)Households 10

Persons 38Avg. per person $52

Population Receiving Foodstamps ( %) 2.4%



South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project 15:

1989

13.1%20.4%12.0%10.9%16.6%12.3%28.6%40.0%

100.0%

$26,722

1996

3

5

5

0.3%

11

38$52

2.4%

1990

58.2%83.5%90.6%

173

151

Todd 1995 Population Estimate 9,105

1980 1990 1994 (est.) .

Percent of PopulationPopulation under 20 3,503 4,055 4,464 Under 18 in 1992:White 476 428 461 49.9%American Indian 3,002 3,608 3,988Black (...) 5 13 Percent of PopulationOther 25 14 2 Under 5 in 1992:Population under 5 1,013 1,154 1,238 13.8%




Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) 7 25.93 29 22.50Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) <3 33.24 9 59.84Low Birth Weight Babies (%) 18 6.7% 70 5.4%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) <3 123.30 8 197.29Births to Single Teens (%) 57 21.1% 271 21.0%Women Receiving Prenatal Care


/School District: Drop-Out Rate

94/95 95/96

Todd County 3.44% 4.97%


OVor...

0 0



2,126 2,106 242 240

66

681 658 NA NA

tf tf

21993 1994

Juvenile Offense ReferralsFormal <3 <3

Violent 0 0Informal 7 13



152

15


1980 1990



Todd

Family Profile


1980 1990













Related children under 5 NC 76.6%




Recipients 1,932 1,893

Children 1,449 1,417Population Receiving AFDC (%) 21.2% 20.8%


Persons 3,545 3,541





South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project153

15

Tripp 1995 Population Estimate 6,902

1980 1990 1994 (est.) .


White 2,157 1,875 1,873 30.3%American Indian 308 353 369Black (- -) 0 0 Percent of PopulationOther 278 6 5 Under 5 in 1992:





Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) 5 50.00 9 16.61Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) 0 0 <3 12.06Low Birth Weight Babies (%) 7 7.0% 35 6.5%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) 0 0 <3 42.11Births to Single Teens (%) 7 7.0% 60 11.1%Women Receiving Prenatal Care


School District:

ColomeWinner


Drop-Out Rate


Enrollment Children with a Disability94/95 95/96 Fall 95

0.00% 0.00% 2293.76% 4.78% 1,176

0.00% 0.00% 1


ViolentInformal



1993 1994

21 400 0

138 97

154

15


230 20 211,118 123 129

1 NA NA


1980 1990


South Dakota KIDS COUNT Pro:led

Tripp

Family Profile

/72



1980 1990


Female Headed Families 161 179With children 95 121

Without children 66 58Male Headed Families 70 90


c





All Families 18.9% 14.7%




Related children under 18 52.6% 64.2%Related children under 5 NC 61.5%




Recipients 250 207

Children 183 153



Persons 728 681




Total 46.6% 52.2%With children under 6 50.5% 64.1%

With children 6-17 64.8% 64.6%

South Dako *a KIDS COUNT Proieci15

155

Turner 1995 Population Estimate 8,603




Key Ilealfh Indicafors


1991-95 (Combined Rate)Number `)/0 or Rate

Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) <3 10.64 4 8.47Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) 0 0 3 32.86Low Birth Weight Babies (%) 8 8.5% 32 6.8%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) <3 187.62 6 225.14Births to Single Teens ( %) 3 3.2% 22 4.7%Women Receiving Prenatal Care


Key Education Indicafors


Centerville 0.54% 1.05% 337 331 51 48Hurley 0.00% 1.09% 180 177 23 20Marion 2.08% 0.65% 322 328 56 52Parker 0.00% 0.00% 477 466 57 55Viborg 0.73% 2.84% 283 286 43 50




Informal 9 16



156 152,

Key Safely Indicafors

1980 1990



Turner

Family Profile



1980 1990

Married Couple Families 2,472 2,194With children 1,135 973Without children 1,337 1,221




- .-, '',-.)













South Dakota KIDS COUNT Proieci 1 157

Union 1995 Population Estimate 11,225


Population under 20 3,694 3,207 3'477 Under 20 in 1994:White 3,623 3,163 3,439 31.6%American Indian 31 12 11

Black (. ) 7 7 Percent of PopulationOther 40 25 20 Under 5 in 1994:

Population under 5 1,039 725 739 6.7%


1995Number `)/0 or Rate


Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) <3 7.58 3 4.52Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) 0 0 4 33.40Low Birth Weight Babies (%) 5 3.8% 35 5.3%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) 0 0 <3 57.72Births to Single Teens (%) 13 9.8% 53 8.0%Women Receiving Prenatal Care


Key indicators


Alcester-Hudson 1.54% 1.15% 537 548 82 82Beresford 0.27% 0.77% 740 721 94 77Elk Point-Jefferson 2.20% 1.23% 664 687 77 81

Dakota Valley 2.94% 1.77% 565 609 92 84Greater Hoyt NA NA NA NA 0 5

Greater Scott NA NA NA NA 4 4Private Schools 0.00% 0.00% 69 61 NA NA(Inc. BIA & Parochial)



Informal 38 29




158

1


1980 1990

Teens not in' School & not in

Labor Force orUnemployed 7.5% 4.7%


Union

Family Profile


1980 1990





_-Key Economic Indicators














1 6 T:

Walworii 1995 Population Estimate 5,834

1980 1990 1994 (est.) .


White 2,006 1,427 1,366 27.8%American Indian 222 248 245Black (. -) 1 2 Percent of PopulationOther 15 7 6 Under 5 in 1994:


Key Health indicators



Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) 0 0 4 10.39Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) 0 0 <3 31.52Low Birth Weight Babies (%) 3 3.5% 19 4.9%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) 0 0 <3 109.59Births to Single Teens (%) 15 17.4% 49 12.7%Women Receiving Prenatal Care

(c)/0, during first trimester) 65 75.6% 280 75.3%



Mobridge 7.11% 6.25% 770 758 78 78Selby 0.00% 0.00% 316 327 39 38



ViolentInformal



160

1993 1994 Key Safety Indicators

540

36

FY 95

3

14

52<333

FY 96

10

21

1980

Teens not inSchool & not inLabor Force orUnemployed 3.6%

1 6

1990

2.3%


Walworfh

Family Profile



1,720






1980 1990




1979 1989

14.8% 17.8%16.7% 27.2%19.4% 31.2%12.6% 12.2%17.8% 20.9%17.4% 18.4%41.3% 40.7%39.6% 59.0%

NC 62.5%

$24,662 $25,050









1 s

Yankfon 1995 Population Estimate 20,754







Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) 0 0 9 6.24Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) <3 24.12 6 28.94Low Birth Weight Babies (%) 10 3.9% 72 5.0%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) <3 81.23 3 48.74Births to Single Teens ( %) 27 10.5% 112 7.8%Women Receiving Prenatal Care



Gayville-Volin 0.88%Irene 0.00%Yankton 3.66%


Education Indicators_


3.57% 2250.00% 2944.53% 3,214

0.00% 216



Informal 200 250




16


222 35 35269 34 31

3,232 303 319

213 NA NA

Key Sakety Indicators

1980 1990



Yankton

Family Profile









1980 1990




1979 1989

10.0% 13.5%9.8% 16.3%

11.5% 16.1%6.5% 9.4%8.6% 12.8%

10.4% 16.2%0.0% 39.7%

34.2% 49.9%NC 77.8%

$29,400 $28,102

1995 1996







South Dakota KIDS COUNT Proied6

163

liebach 1995 Population Estimate 2,215


Population under 20 1,093 1,008 1,012 Under 20 in 1994:White 336 233 227 46.6%American Indian 755 771 781

Black 0 1 1 Percent of PopulationOther 2 3 3 Under 5 in 1994:





Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000 live births) <3 45.45 5 20.00Child Death Rate (per 100,000,age 1-14) 0 0 <3 26.49Low Birth Weight Babies (%) 4 9.1% 16 6.4%Teen Violent Death Rate (per 100,000,age 15-19) <3 995.02 5 497.51Births to Single Teens (%) 7 15.9% 44 17.6%Women Receiving Prenatal Care



Dupree 2.40%




1.78% 313 283 56 52

0.00% 305 321 NA NA

001



Informal 0 4





1980 1990


164 16 South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project

liebach

Family Profile



1980 1990
















.44,11,:Wtrg


16:

>Definitions of Data

Elements and the Source of

the Data

Sources

and

Derinifions

16D

Jr

J

coo-pRr

a Population

Sources and Dermilions mr"GD3

Source:1980 and 1990 Census of Population andHousing, Bureau of the Census. Thisinformation was received from the State DataCenter of South Dakota. A (...) indicates thatthe data are being withheld to avoid disclosureof information for individuals. Those individualsare then included in the "other" category. A"NA" in a column means that information is notcurrently available. Estimates for 1994 werecalculated by the State Data Center usinginformation from "Estimates of Population" fromthe Census Bureau.

Definitions:Native American: This category includesEskimo, Aleut and American Indian.

Family ProfileSource:1980 and 1990 Census of Population andHousing, prepared by the State Data Center atthe University of South Dakota.

Definitions:Household: A household includes all thepersons who occupy a housing unit (whichincludes house, apartment, mobile home, groupof rooms, or a single room that is occupied asseparate living quarters).

Householder: One person in each household isdesignated as the householder. In most casesthis is the person, or one of the persons, inwhose name the home is owned, being bought,or rented.

Family households: A family consists of one ormore other persons living in the samehousehold who are related to the householder bybirth, marriage, or adoption.

Married couple family: A family in which thehouseholder and his or her spouse areenumerated as members of the same household.

Related children: Related children in a familyinclude own children and all other persons under18 years of age in the household, regardless ofmarital status, who are related to the house-holder, except the spouse of the householder.Foster children are not included since they arenot related to the householder.

Male householder family: A family with a malehouseholder and no spouse present.

Female householder family: A family with afemale householder and no spouse present.

n Health IndicatorsSource:South Dakota Department of Health

Definitions:Infant mortality rate: An infant death is defined asoccurring after a live birth with death occurringbefore one year. Rates are per 1,000 live births.

Child death rate: Child death rates are calculatedfor ages one through fourteen and are per100,000 population in that age group.

Low birth weight babies: Low birth weightbabies are those born weighing less than 2,500grams (about 5 pounds, 9 ounces).

Teen violent death rate: Rates are per 100,000population aged fifteen through nineteen andincludes homicide, suicide, and accidents(includes car accidents, drowning, etc.).

Births to single teens: Statistics are for singlefemales under the age of 20.

Women receiving prenatal care: Statistics arebased on live single births to pregnant women


17

receiving prenatal care during the first trimesterof pregnancy by county of residence.

Economic Indicators

Source:

The South Dakota Department of Social Ser-vices, Office of Child Care Services, mission is toimprove the quality, availability, accessibility, andaffordability of child care in South Dakota. It isresponsible for the regulating of the child daycare programs. The standards established by theDepartment are minimum and upon which aquality program can be built. All benefits arepaid through the Office of Child Care Services,and go directly to the child care provider. Provid-ers must be licensed or registered, or can be arelative or in-home provider. A registration orlicense is not necessarily an indicator of a qualityprogram. {700 Governors Drive Pierre 57501.Phone: 1-800-227-3020 or 605-773-4766},

Definitions of Regulated Day Care ProgramsFamily Day Care Home - Registered: SouthDakota law defines a Family Day Care home asone in which care is given on a regular basis forany part of a twenty-four hour day to twelve orless children from more than one unrelatedfamily. This includes any children under the ageof six who are living in the home. Family daycare is a service provided in the provider's home(a separate facility cannot be used).

Family day care providers are registered ratherthan licensed. Registration is a process wherebythe applicants declare their intent to providefamily day care and agree to comply withstandards which have been established by theDepartment of Social Services. A registrationcertificate is in effect for 2 years. Registration islegally mandated when a provider receivescompensation from public funds. Providers whoare not receiving reimbursement from publicfunds are exempt from registration. A family daycare provider must be at least 18 years old.

Group Family Day Care Home - Licensed: SouthDakota law defines a Group Family Day Carehome as a facility that provides child care for partof a day as a supplement to regular parental carefor 13 to 20 children, including the provider's ownchildren who are under the age of 6 years, and thechildren from more than 1 unrelated family. Agroup family day care home may be located in theprovider's own home or in a separate facility.

Group family day care homes are mandated bylaw to be licensed regardless of the fundingsource. A license is in effect for 1 year. Providerslicensed as group family day care homes may beeligible to receive reimbursement through theChild Care Food Program if their program islocated in a family home.

Day Care Center - Licensed: South Dakota lawdefines a Day Care Center as a facility whichprovides child care for part of a 24 hour period to21 or more children, including the provider's ownchildren under the age of 6 years, and from 1 ormore unrelated families, regardless of the sourceof income. A day care center may be located inthe provider's own home or in a separate facility.

Day care centers are mandated by law to belicensed regardless of the funding source. Alicense is in effect for 1 year. A day care centermay be operated as a nonprofit organization or asan independent, proprietary facility. Nurseryschools which do not provide regular daily care areexempted from licensure by SDCL 26-6-27.

AFDC Child Care: Provides payment of child careexpenses for AFDC families who are attendingapproved education or training activities under theFamily Independence Program. No co-paymentrequired, must be receiving AFDC.

Transitional Child Care: Provides 12 months ofchild care payments for families whose AFDCcase closed because of earnings. May earn up to185% of the Federal Poverty Level. Must havereceived AFDC in immediately preceding month


1 7 -5

and at least two other months in the six monthsprior to ineligibility. AFDC case must be closeddue to employment income. Co-payment isrequired and is for working families only; does notpay for school hours.

Non-AFDC Child Care Assistance: Families maynot be receiving AFDC, parents must work orwork/attend school and may earn up to 135% ofthe Federal Poverty Level. Students must work aminimum of 20 hours per week. Certain studentsmay be exempt from the work requirement.

Source:Poverty information and females 16 and over inthe labor force are from the 1980 and 1990Census of Population and Housing, State DataCenter of South Dakota at the Universityof South Dakota.

AFDC/Foodstamp participation is taken from theSouth Dakota Department of Social Services1993 and 1994 Annual Statistical Report and arefor fiscal years.

Definitions:Below poverty: The income cutoffs used by theCensus Bureau to determine the poverty statusincludes a set of 49 thresholds arranged in atwo-dimensional matrix consisting of family sizecross-classified by presence and number offamily members under 18. The total income ofeach family or individual was tested against theappropriate poverty status of that family or indi-vidual. If income was less than the correspondingcutoff, the family or individual was classified as'below the poverty level'. The average povertythreshold for a family of four was $12,674 in1989.

"NC" (not comparable): Poverty statistics forfemale householders with children were calcu-lated for "under 6" in 1980 not "under 5" as in the1990 Census and therefore are not comparable.

Median family income: The median divides theincome distribution into two equal parts, one

having incomes above the median and the otherhaving incomes below the median. For families,the median family income is based on thedistribution of the total number of units includingthose with no income.

Labor force: all person classified in the civilianlabor force plus members of the U.S. ArmedForces (persons on active duty with the UnitedStates Army, Air Force, Navy, Marine Corps, orthe Coast Guard). The civilian labor forceconsists of persons classified as employed orunemployed (unemployed includes all civilianswho were not at work and were looking for workduring the last four weeks and were available toaccept a job).

rl Education IndicatorsSource:Department of Education and Cultural Affairs forthe State of South Dakota. Statistics for dropoutrates and enrollment are for pre-K throughtwelve. Child Count data on disabilities is forindividuals age three through twenty-one.

Definitions:Dropout rate: Dropout rates presented in theFactbook are "event dropout rates". The eventdropout rate represents the share of studentswho leave school without completing high schoolduring a single year. The dropout rates for theState of South Dakota districts/schools werecalculated by dividing the number of dropouts inthe school year by the accumulative enrollment.The dropout figures for race are the percent ofthe total dropouts in the public and non-publicschools. These figures are not comparable to thefigures in the 1995 Factbook as those figureswere derived from a different calculation. A "NA"indicates there were no schools (private and/orpublic) in the county.

Enrollment: Total number of students enrolled inschool on the last Friday of school in September.

170 17,; South Dakota KIDS COUNT Proieci

Children with a disability: This information isobtained from the Special Education ChildCount done every December to determineage, placement alternatives, and disablingconditions for children with special needs. Thenumber presented represents the number ofchildren with disabling conditions in the desig-nated school district. These conditionsinclude: deaf, blind, serious emotionallydisturbed, mental retardation, hearing andvisual impairments, specific learning disabili-ties, multiple disabilities, orthopedic impair-ments, speech/language impairments, otherhealth impairments, autism, and traumaticbrain injury. Child Count data does not includeprivate or BIA schools but does includeChapter I State operated/State supportedprograms.

Safely Indicators

Source:Information for this portion of the Factbookwas obtained from a variety of sources. Juve-nile crime referrals was provided by the CourtServices Department of the South DakotaUnified Judicial System. The Department ofCorrections gathered the data on admissionsto juvenile correctional facilities. Admissionsto drug or alcohol treatment programs wasprovided by the South Dakota Department ofHuman Services, Division of Alcohol and DrugAbuse. Teens not in school and not in thelabor force is from the 1980 and 1990 Censusand was provided by the State Data Center ofSouth Dakota.

Definitions:Juvenile crime referrals: This figure representsthe number of youth under eighteen years ofage who are referred to the Unified JudicialSystem (UJS) by the states attorneys.Juvenile informational complaints may be filedwith the states attorney by law enforcementofficials, parents, court services officers(alleged probation violations), and others. The

states attorney may decide to file a formal petition,refer the case to a court services department for a90-day informal adjustment, refer the case to aprivate agency approved by the court, or take noaction. Numbers are for the county in whichapprehension took place and represent the numberof cases rather than individuals. In other words, if achild was referred to UJS for several differentoffenses, he or she would be counted severaldifferent times.

Juvenile admissions to drug or alcohol treatmentprograms: Admissions include youth under eighteenyears of age who received State accredited alcoholand drug services ranging from crisis intervention tostructured treatment programs. The person iscounted once for every program in which the clientparticipated. However, if the individual was admittedto the same program more than once, they are onlycounted once. Admissions include both residentialand outpatient treatment programs.

Explanation: Admission totals may includejuveniles who are counted more than once if theyreceived services at different programs. The reasonfor this is because the system does not track clientsby a common identifier but is set up to track clients byfacility. Although the possibility of a client beingcounted more than once exists, it is probablyuncommon.

Admissions to juvenile correctional facilities: Totalnumber of juveniles admitted to a Department ofCorrections facility (includes the State TrainingSchool, Youth Forestry Camp, and the Lamont YouthDevelopment Center). Figures are by county ofcommitment which means the county of record inwhich the judge conducted the adjudication anddispositional proceedings. It can be county ofresidence or the county where the offense occurred.

Teens not in school and not in labor force orunemployed: This figure is the percent of allindividuals sixteen to twenty who are not enrolled inschool or are not high school graduates ("high schooldropouts"), and unemployed (currently seeking work)or not in the labor force (not currently seeking work).

South Dakota KIDS COUNT Proieci 171

17

A PARABLE

Two men were fishing in a stream when an infantfloated past. The first fisherman jumped in, rescuedthe child and handed him up to safety into the secondfisherman's arms. No sooner had they settled theinfant on the grass, when a second baby floated along.Again, the fisherman jumped in and rescued the baby.A third baby floated along, a fourth, and so on.

The fisherman saved each in turn. Finally, a wholegroup of babies came floating downstream. The firstfisherman grabbed as many as he could and looked tosee his friend walking away. "Hey," he shouted, "what'swrong with you? Aren't you going to help me savethese babies?"

To which the second fisherman replied, "You save thesebabies. I'm going to go upstream to see who's throwingall the babies into the river!"

(From "Families First", a newsletter of the West Virginia KIDS COUNT Fund)

i,'iCC copies printed at c cost of approximately $5.82 etch ct Benchmarlt Printing, Billings, Vl,7Li2

17f:

tYG

4g,

Counting the KIDS Who COUNT on us..

The Annie E. Casey Foundation (410) 547-6600The Annie E. Casey Foundation is a private charitable organizationfounded in 1948. The organization is dedicated to contributing to betterfutures for disadvantaged children in the United States.

The grant making of the Foundation is limited to initiatives that havesignificant potential to improve policies and services affecting childrenand families.

To help foster a more urgent commitment to improving life outcomes forchildren and greater public accountability for progress on their behalf,the Foundation provides support for KIDS COUNT projects in all 50states.

The State Data Center (605) 677-5287The State Data Center of South Dakota (SDC) was established in 1981 forthe purpose of disseminating Census Bureau data to the public throughstate agencies, libraries, and other regional organizations. It isresponsible for expanding the orientation of and technical assistance incensus data access and use. The SDC has expertise in data collection,data processing and publication, data analysis, presentation of data,provision of technical assistance on data usage, and distribution.

The SDC is a division of the Business Research Bureau, School of Business,at the University of South Dakota.

The South Dakota KIDS COUNT Project

17-4g# 4g, 4g,

U.S. Department of EducationOffice of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI)

Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC)

REPRODUCTION RELEASE

I. DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION:

(Specific Document)

ERIC

Title: South Dakota KIDS COUNT Factbook - State & County Profiles of Child Well Being 1996

Author(s): Cochran, Carole & Dykstra? De Vee

Corporate Source:University of South Dakota

Publication Date:

January 1997

II. REPRODUCTION RELEASE:In order to disseminate as widely as possible timely and significant materials of interest to the educational community, documents announced

in the monthly abstract journal of the ERIC system, Resources in Education (RIE), are usually made available to users in microfiche, reproducedpaper copy, and electronic/optical media, and sold through the ERIC Document Reproduction Service (EDRS) or other ERIC vendors. Credit isgiven to the source of each document, and, if reproduction release is granted, one of the following notices is affixed to the document.

If permission is granted to reproduce and disseminate the identified document, please CHECK ONE of the following two options and sign atthe bottom of the page.

XX

ICheck here

For Level 1 Release:Permitting reproduction inmicrofiche (4" x 6" film) orother ERIC archival media(e.g., electronic or optical)and paper copy.

rftikr)C\1

Signre->

lease

The sample sticker shown below will beaffixed to all Level 1 documents

PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE ANDDISSEMINATE THIS MATERIAL

HAS BEEN GRANTED BY

\e


Level 1

The sample sticker shown below will beaffixed to all Level 2 documents

PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE ANDDISSEMINATE THIS

MATERIAL IN OTHER THAN PAPERCOPY HAS BEEN GRANTED BY

\e


Level 2

Documents will be processed as indicated provided reproduction quality permits. If permissionto reproduce is granted, but neither box is checked, documents will be processed at Level 1.

El

Check hereFor Level 2 Release:Permitting reproduction inmicrofiche (4' x 6" film) orother ERIC archival media(e.g., electronic or optical),but not in paper copy.

"I hereby grant to the Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC) nonexclusive permission to reproduce and disseminatethis document as indicated above. Reproduction from the ERIC microfiche or electronic/optical media by persons other thanERIC employees and its system contractors requires permission from the copyright holder. Exception is made for non-profitreproduction by libraries and other service agencies to satisfy information needs of educators in response to discrete inquiries."

ature:

rganizatio ACkiress: S.Micig.'"CrYGNT.-Projec t

State Data CenterUniversity of South Dakota414 East Clark StreetVermillion, SD 57069

Printed Name/Position/Title:

CAreole CoCh GA 12 +1), d-47N- 4osTelephone: FAY:

605-677-5287 605-677-5427

E-Mail Address:[email protected]

Date:

3/6/97

lover)

III. DOCUMENT AVAILABILITY INFORMATION (FROM NON-ERIC SOURCE):If permission to reproduce is not granted to ERIC, or, if you wish ERIC to cite the availability of the document from another source,please provide the following information regarding the availability of the document. (ERIC will not announce a document unless it ispublicly available, and a dependable source can be specified. Contributors should also be aware that ERIC selection criteria aresignificantly more stringent for documents that cannot be made available through EDRS.)

Publisher/Distributor:

Address:

Price:

IV. REFERRAL OF ERIC TO COPYRIGHT/REPRODUCTION RIGHTS HOLDER:If the right to grant reproduction release is held by someone other than the addressee, please provide the appropriate name and address:

Name:

Address:

V. WHERE TO SEND THIS FORM:

Send this form to the following ERIC Clearinghouse:

KAREN E. SMITHERIC/EECECHILDREN'S RESEARCH CENTERUNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS51 GERTY DRIVECHAMPAIGN, IL 61820-7469

However, if solicited by the ERIC Facility, or if making an unsolicited contribution to ERIC, return this form (and the document beingcontributed) to:

ERIC Processing and Reference Facility1100 West Street, 2d Floor

Laurel, Maryland 20707-3598

Telephone: 301-497-4080Toll Free: 800-799-3742

FAX: 301-953-0263e-mail: [email protected]

WWW: http://ericfac.piccard.csc.com(Rev. 6/96)