mycommittees.api.orgmycommittees.api.org/standards/cre/sci/shared docume… · web...

API INSPECTION CODES TASK GROUP SCORECARDNov 12, 2011

B - Balloted/A- Approved R - Refer to RP D- Redundant item –deleted B -Balloted – resolve/re-ballot P - Currently assigned or pending assignment

API 510 – PRESSURE VESSEL INSPECTION CODEItem No. Status Section Subject Originator Assigned Notes

510-133 R 5.7 Procedural requirements for UT thickness measurements.Note: Task Group concurred that this information should reside in RP 572 rewrite task group.

TI 510-I-02/03 G. Heath G. Heath presented a proposed wording to be added API 510 Paragraph 5.7 to address temperature limitations for ultrasonic testing. The wording is acceptable for Bullet #4 in 570, 510 and 653 but the rest of the proposal should be included in 574.Roland should communicate the wording of bullet point 4 to Carl and the 653 committee.

510-134 R Include wording to address the issues of doubling UT thickness readings.

D. Martinez K. Smith Completed. This scorecard item is included with item 133 above it.

510-135 P 1.1.13.23

Define what it means for a pressure vessel to be "placed in service".

Shell ballot J. Reynolds Prepare draft change for review at Spring 2006 meeting.

510-136 B 1.2.2b Flag Item Vessels with a design pressure less than +/- 15 psi are exempted from code. Believe large equipment in this pressure range should still be inspected per API 510, e.g vacuum columns, CCU regenerator, etc. At least the external inspection requirements should be applicable

J RileyD. Layman

Reviewed at Spring 2006, Fall 2006, and Spring 2007. D. Layman wrote simplified version to be balloted and reviewed in Fall 2007 meeting (510-25-07).Include inquiry from Bill Neill about concern that all vessels, regardless of exemption should have an initial inspection.

510-139 R 5.5 Introduce and rename inspections as being "intrusive and non-intrusive". Reflects comments related to changing "on-stream" inspection to non-intrusive inspection throughout the document

D WangR. Sitton

J. Riley Ryan Sitton prepared draft for review in Spring 2006 meeting. Review definitions section for On-stream. Include wording cautioning that an external may not present the same opportunity for localized corrosion and internals damage. (See IP 12 wording) May need to include additional NDE coverage, advanced techniques; need to consider areas that may not be accesses (such as under saddle supports). – Resolultion was to consider this as part of RP 572 text and explanations and leave API 510 with “on-stream” as it is already.

510-143 P 3.363.41

Need to add comments and direction for pressure boundary versus non-pressure boundary

Shell ballot J. Reynolds No action yet.

of 19




510-144 P 5.8.7 Create definition for "Major repair" and consider its implications for pressure testing.

Shell ballot J. Reynolds Proposed: Any work not considered an alteration that removes and replaces part of the pressure boundary, e.g. replacing part of the shell or replacing a head. Term added to pressure test. This should be part of the review for scorecard item 510-146

510-146 P 3 Create a definition for pressure testing and leak testing versus testing. Clarify these concepts. ASME PCC-2 uses term “tightness testing”. Review use of terms hydrostatic, pneumatic, and other wording associated with testing.

Shell ballot J. Riley,R. Konet; Bill Bagnato from NBIC

Review changes made in API 510 rewrite. See if further changes are necessary around wording that includes the term “testing”. Compare with new ASME PCC-2 Part 5: Article 5.1 – Pressure and Tightness Testing of Piping and Equipment. Note: NBIC Part 1 and Part 2 subgroups doing the same thing for NBIC. Also, include these in RP 572 rewrite.

510-157 P 5.5.5 Remove insulation for susceptible areas for CUI P. Hunt P. Hunt No action yet.

510-161 P 8.1.5.4 Need for an engineer or inspector to approve routine repairs

B. Smallwood B. Smallwood No action yet.

510-166 P 5.11.4 Mis-marked materials verification G. Heath G. Heath, P. Hunt

Not sure of issue or status.

510-167 B 8.1.5.1.1 Item e: Date for temporary repairs Unknown J. Riley Was API rewrite item 41. Current ballot to change word temporary to interim and include documentation of technical considerations for interim period before more permanent repair is done.Balloted Fall 2007 (510-26-07).

510-168 P 8.1.6.4.2 Authorized inspector responsible when PWHT welding alternatives are used in lieu of PWHT

J. Reynolds J. Reynolds Not sure of status.

510-169 B New item Requirements for vessels in cyclic service J. Reynolds J. Riley, Robert Sims

Review roundtable information on cyclic service vessels. Make recommendation on addition wording for inspection requirements. Ballot 510-23-06 pending resolution.Proposal was revised and approved for reballot in Fall 07 (510-27-07).

of 19




510-171 P New item Revise references to API 579 standard when published

J. Riley J. Riley Waiting publication of API 579-1 /ASME 579-1 2007 (API 579 Second Edition). Then correct all references in API 510 and API 570.

510-172 B 5.8.18.1.5

ASME PCC-2 References J. Riley J. Riley Draft ballot reviewed Spring 2007. Current ballot prepared for review in Fall 2007 (510-28-07).

510-173 B 7.4.2 Corrosion Averaging in Reinforced Areas. J. Riley J. Riley Ballot prepared for review in Fall 2007 (510-29-07). Refer to inquiry 510-I-04-07.

510-174 P 3 In the definition of same service, quantify a “period of years” that describes the length of time the vessel’s operating conditions have been consistent.

P. HuntBal. 510-15-06

510-175 P 5.5.3.2 Add text that mentions the purpose of performing the inspection.

G. AlvaradoBal. 510-16-06

510-176 P 7.1.1.2 When evaluating a corrosion rate, add a first step to assure that the NDE readings used to determine wall thickness are of sufficient accuracy and precision to calculate a valid corrosion rate of suitable precision.


510-177 P 5.5.1 We must consider that certain process parameters will change that are intrinsic to the process and cannot be lowered. This does not necessarily mean the unit needs to be shutdown or equipment replaced. It does mean that if there is potential consequence to reliability or safety that qualified people determine the appropriate course of action, if any is needed. See added wording to first sentence below.


510-178 P 5.7.2.4c,d5.11.2

The word "excessive" is used in several places in the document. I would suggest we consider a more definitive descriptor if possible (maybe a range) since this a relative term and may cause the reader to make an incorrect judgment.

R. GoodmanJISI Ballot 1

510-179 P 3 Add definition for “corrosion allowance”. R. DuvicJISI Ballot 1

of 19




510-180 P 3 Add definition for “damage mechanism R. RileyJISI Ballot 1

510-181 P 3.2 Add a definition for "data report". This is a somewhat generic term

D. LaymanJISI Ballot 1

510-182 P 3.21 Delete the word “visual” in the definition of external inspection. The document addresses other types of inspection for external inspection.

N. FaranssoJISI Ballot 1

510-183 P 3.22 In the definition of FFS, delete the word “conditions” and change “integrity” to “structural integrity”.

G. BuchheimJISI Ballot 1

510-184 P 3.41 Change the definition of “non-pressure boundary” to read: “Components of, or the portion of . . .”


510-185 P 5 Add a section covering inspection of pressure gages. C. HarleyJISI Ballot 1

510-186 P 5 Add new section covering inspection audits. D. LaymanJISI Ballot 1

510-187 P 5.1.1.3 Add requirement to periodically review the inspection plans.

R. RileyJISI Ballot 1

510-188 P 5.1.2 In the minimum contents of an inspection plan, add “CMLs” to item (d) and add a new item (h): “acceptance/rejection criteria”.

C. HarleyJISI Ballot 1

510-189 P 5.6.3 Add a list of characteristics that could lead to the need for the selection of more CMLs (see JISI draft).

O. KonskiJISI Ballot 1

510-190 P 5.7.1 Show list of examination techniques in a table with columns of: Damage Type, Flaw Type, Inspection Technique, ASME Section V Article.


of 19




510-191 P 5.7.2 Since corrosion loss can take three forms, uniform, local, and pitting, suggest changing the first sentence to “Corrosion may cause a uniform loss, a localized loss, or may cause a pitted appearance.”. Suggest ending the second sentence after the word “visually”. Suggest adding a sentence, “For all three forms of metal loss, measurements are necessary to determine the extent and magnitude of the loss.”, after the first sentence.


510-192 P 5.7.2.4 Modify the factors that can reduce the accuracy of UT measurements (see JISI ballot comments).

G. HeathJISI Ballot 1

510-193 P 5.8.2.1 Add an equation of the hydrostatic test pressure for vessels designed to ASME B&PV Code Section VIII, Division 2.


510-194 P 5.8.2.2 Identify a more appropriate term for “non-code related pressure test”.

G. RoderyJISI Ballot 1

510-195 P 5.8.4.2 Add guidance on actions to take after a pressure test and what to do if potable water is not available, including establishing a minimum chloride level (see JISI ballot comments).Make the inspector’s verification of the water quality mandatory (change should to shall).

R. GoodmanG. BuchheimJISI Ballot 1

510-196 P 5.8.5 Require an engineer to review the potential personnel and property risks when substituting a pneumatic test for a hydrostatic test.


510-197 P 5.9.1 Reword to include the use of component markings and/or a simple magnet to check carbon steel materials. The use of an alloy analyzer can be used at the discretion of the inspector.

E. EllisJISI Ballot 1

510-198 P 6.3.1 Clean up this section by revising with better code-like language and create a table with recommended maximum intervals similar to Table 6-1 in API 570.

C. RoderyJISI Ballot 1

of 19




510-199 P 7.4 Remove FFS assessment from 510. This can be done only after Level 1 in 579 is made uniform in its complexity and able to be applied by an inspector and referenced in the inspection codes.


510-200 P 7.4.4 Look at incorporating the new information in ASME Section VIII Div 2 to the alternative evaluation methods for thinning.


510-201 P 8.1.5.1.2.3 Clarify appropriateness of piggybacking reinforcement pads (ASME Code does not prohibit and a sketch also appears in Bednar’s Pressure Vessel Design Handbook)


510-202 P Verify wording and use of TML’s versus CML’s in latest edition of API 510.

ConocoPhillips Email March 2008.

of 19




510-203 P 5.4.4 Vessels in cyclic service (cycles of pressure, temperature, or combinations of both pressure and temperature) should be evaluated for potential failures. The following considerations should be evaluated where applicable for vessels in cyclic service:a. originally designed and fabrication based on an applicable construction code with additional consideration of cyclic service operation;b. potential for internal or external corrosion (e.g. corrosion under insulation), cracking, or other types of damage during cycling and at steady state; c. potential for fatigue cracking of the vessel and contributing fatigue propagation from internal or external vessel attachments, repairs, modifications, corrosion, damage (e.g. gouges);d. engineering analysis to determine maximum tolerable flaw sizes and critical locations to assist in selection of NDE of suitable sensitivity and areas for inspection;

e. the need for appropriate NDE to detect fatigue failure or distortion [such as external ultrasonic shearwave flaw detection, external and/or internal wet fluorescent magnetic particle testing time-of-flight diffraction ultrasonics (TOFD), out-of-roundness measurement, and measurements of weld seams for peaking or flattening].

G Alverado Ballot 510-27-07

510-204 P 5.4.4 Also revise the list of considerations into questions for consideration, as shown below, and make these fatigue "considerations" a requirement, not a suggestion. Also revise the lead-in sentence to draw attention to the fact that these considerations are for their impact on inspection plans, which is sort-of assumed but not implicitly stated.

J Reynolds Ballot 510-27-07

of 19




510-205 P 8.1.5.1 8.1.5.1.5, but refer to the PCC-2 mechanical clamps article.


510-206 P 7.4.2.4 Simply stated, all FFS rules should be removed from API 510 and API 570 and replaced with a direct reference to API 579-1/ASME FFS-1. The thickness averaging rules in API 510 and API 570 are not correct and may result in unconservative assessments. In addition, what is in these documents is confusing and of limited.We are now on the second edition of API 579, the expertise for FFS assessments reside in the API/ASME FFSJC, its time to remove all FFS rules from API 510 and API 570. This is duplication of material, duplication of effort, and likely a waste of committee members time.In addition, we just published the joint API/ASME document to enhance acceptance by jurisdictions. Duplication of rules in API 510 and API 570 only confuse the issue. In fact, a jurisdiction may decide to limit FFS evaluations based on the old FFS rules in API 510 and API 570, not a good situation.We should be pointing users of 510. 570 and 653 inspection documents to the API/ASME joint standard for the reasons stated above.Greg Alvarado on behalf of D.A. Osage

G Alverado Ballot 510-29-07

510-207 P 7.7 Enhance guidance on JE to be used in seamless heads when RT is unknown.m

TI 510-I-07/07 Clay Rodery, Clay White, Ken Tam

510-208 P Inclusion of RBI in E&P Section of 510 BP

of 19



API 570 – PIPING INSPECTION CODEItem No. Status Section Subject Originator Assigned Notes

570-012 B New Alternative rules for off-site piping. J. Riley John O’Brien / Clay White

Ballot 570-20-06 was not approved and the proposal was put on hold for revision.

570-017 P 8 Create wording for updates of piping isometrics to identify temporary (interim?) repairs

F. Furillo John O’Brien No action yet.

570-018 P Procedural requirements for UT thickness measurements.

TI 510-I-02/03 Mark Geisenhoff / John O’Brien

Mark and John are to verify that the words on UT in 574 are captured in 574 or needed in 510. Refer to API 510 TI 510-I-02/03. Check API 572 as well.

570-024 A 3 Incorporate CML definitions into section 3 and other document sections as applicable

J. O’Brien J. O’BrienR. Konet

Maintain consistency with API 510 rewrite. Covered under API 570 rewrite. Refer to Scorecard item 510-145

570-025 A 5.8.1 Evaluate 50 ppm chloride level, reference NACE standard as appropriate and 570

K. Tam John Reynolds Don’t remember what K. said about this process/material corrosion engineer item. Is it still a concern?Incorporated in the API 570, 3rd edition. Completed

570-027 A Need to add relief devices into scope of API 570. J. Reynolds J. Reynolds Cover under API 570 rewrite. Incorporated in the API 570, 3rd edition. Completed

570-028 A Add comments and direction for pressure boundary vs. non-pressure boundary.

J. Reynolds J. Reynolds Refer to 510-13. Cover under API 570 rewrite. Completed.

of 19




570-029 P Need to evaluate re-pad plugging. John Reynolds No action yet. Duplicate words in 510 if appropriate.

Cut and paste the following from 510 5.5.4.1.2: During the external inspection, particular attention should be given to welds used to attach components (e.g. reinforcement plates, and clips) for cracking or other defects.Any signs of leakage should be investigated so that the sources can be established. Normally, weep holes in reinforcing plates should remain open to provide visual evidence of leakage as well as to prevent pressure build-up behind the reinforcing plate.

570-034 B, P 8.2.6.c Revise radiography requirements wording D. Layman D. Layman Ballot 570-15-06 was approved in Spring 2006. J. Riley and K. Smith will make editorial changes and submit to the SCI for review.

570-039 A Benefits of tale-tell pre-drilled holes (such as ConocoPhillips Borger practice)

J. Reynolds M. Badeen, J. Reynolds

Completed in 574 rewrite. Done.

570-040 B, P Add structural T-min alternative reference table J. Reynolds J. Reynolds, Kelly Smith, K. Tam

Was presented by J. Reynolds in Spring 2005 with technical questions raised in Fall 2006 meeting. Kelly Smith supplied review of major oil and E2G analysis with results that ConocoPhillips summarized. These were incorporated into RP 574. Need only short wording in API 570 indicating the RP 574 reference.

570-041 P New item Consider adding welding PWHT alternatives in lieu of PWHT to API 570.

J. Riley Justin Monroe Verify API 653 has alternatives. Review ballot results of API 653 ballot before recommending changes. Draft ballot for discussion at the Fall Meeting 2011.

of 19




570-042 A New item Definition and new section on surveillance of key process parameters and operating envelope.

J. Riley J. Riley Refer to scorecard item 510-155 on process parameter monitoring and ballot changes. Use same wording approved for API 510 ballot. Ballot and review in Fall 2007 (570-.

570-043 A 5.6 Consider changing section 570, Section 5.6. There is a concern that ultrasonic inspections not be used for NPS 1.5 instead of NPS 1 as it is stated currently

M. Badeen (Needs new person)

No action yet.Addressed in API 570, 3rd edition, section 5.7.1.

570-044 P New item Mixing tees are not addressed in the current edition of 570. Develop mixing tee selection and inspection criteria.

M. Badeen Clay White Cover under API 570 rewrite. Consider including recommended practices from NACE Technical Committee Report 24215. Address corrosion and thermal fatigue. Joe K. J. Reynolds to work with Clay on this item.

570-045 P New item Write a section for threaded connections to be included in 570 and possibly 510; check with overlap in RP 574

M. Badeen Not assigned Cover under RP 574 rewrite and API 570 rewrite.

570-046 B 5.3.5 Missed Piping Traps J. Riley, F. Furillo

J. Riley Balloted for review in Fall 2007 meeting (510-26-07).

570-047 A ASME PCC-2 references for piping that are prudent to reference in API 570

J. Riley J. Riley, J. Reynolds

Cover under API 570 rewrite Incorporated in the API 570, 3rd edition.

570-048 A New item Revise references to API 579 standard when published

J. Riley J. Riley Waiting publication of API 579-1 /ASME 579-1 2007 (API 579 Second Edition). Then correct all references in API 510 and API 570. Include the reference check in API 570 rewrite.Incorporated in the API 570, 3rd edition.

of 19




570-049 A 5.3.95.3.105.5.3

5.6 c,d5.7

5.9 a,b5.117.5D.1

The word "excessive" is used in several places in the document. I would suggest we consider a more definitive descriptor if possible (maybe a range) since this a relative term and may cause the reader to make an incorrect judgment.

R. GoodmanJISI Ballot 1

Found in just one place, section 7.5. Completed.

570-050 A 1.1.1 Expand scope to include FRP and all non-metallic piping systems.

N. BalharethJISI Ballot 1

Incorporated in the API 570, 3rd edition.

570-051 A 1.2.1 Add the following to included fluid services:1. Cryogenic fluids such as: LN2, LH2, LOX, & liquid air.2. High Pressure gasses greater than 150 psig such as: GHe, GH2, GOX, GN2, & HPA.

C. HarleyJISI Ballot 1


570-052 D 1.2.2 Recommend that high pressure steam systems, i.e. 150 psig and greater, not be optional. Section 1.2.2a2 should state: "water (including fire protection systems), steam below 150 psig design pressure, steam -condensate, boiler feed water, and Category D . . . "

D. LaymanJISI Ballot 1

John Harville Delete

570-053 P 3 Add definition for “corrosion allowance”. R. DuvicJISI Ballot 1

J. Reynolds Develop a definition for corrosion allowance for 570 and 510. It is in the draft 10 ed. of 510

570-054 A 3 Add definition for “minimum required thickness”. D. LaymanJISI Ballot 1


570-055 A 3 Add definition for “damage mechanism R. RileyJISI Ballot 1

Added in the API 570, 3rd edition.

570-056 D Are hydrocrackers, etc. examples of piping outside of the plot limits, or examples of units to which the piping could be outside of?

R. DuvicJISI Ballot 1

Delete this item

of 19




570-057 R 5 Add a section covering inspection of flex hoses. C. HarleyJISI Ballot 1

Clay White/ Agree this should be incorporated. Clay to provide a draft ballot for review at the 2011 Fall Meeting. Move this to 574, instead of 570. Moved to 574-03.

570-058 A 5 Add new section covering inspection audits. D. LaymanJISI Ballot 1

Added in the API 570, 3rd edition.

570-059 D 6.4d)Table 6.2

Remove “over 10 years” addressing the age of piping systems that may require inspection if the caulking or seal has deteriorated and allowed in moisture. Should this be at the discretion of the owner/user?


J. Monroe Delete

570-060 P 5.3.3.1 Add additional information on susceptible temperature range requiring CUI inspection.

P. HuntJISI Ballot 1

Check with Peter on what this item is. Hold this item until RP 583 is published. Get alignment with RP 583 at that time.

570-061 A 5.5 Add a list of characteristics that could lead to the need for the selection of more CMLs (see JISI draft).

O. KonskiJISI Ballot 1

Covered the 3rd edition of API 570.

570-062 A 6.2.1c Expand item (c) to additional fluids used in the chemical industry, i.e.;Toxic fluid services ( hazardous chemicals such as hydrogen sulfide, anhydrous hydrogen chloride, hydrofluoric acid, hydrogen cyanide, carbon monoxide, etc., above threshold limits, as defined by applicable regulations)

T. NomuraJISI Ballot 1

Added in the 3rd edition of API 570.

570-063 D 7.4 Remove FFS assessment from 570. This can be done only after Level 1 in 579 is made uniform in its complexity and able to be applied by an inspector and referenced in the inspection codes.


Dead item per committee decision to keep in document.

570-064 D Add definitions on interim repairs as per 510. 510 ballot 510-26-07

DELETE

570-065 A 5.3.5 Level bridle piping issue fits much better under Small Bore Piping and Secondary Piping sections


Mentioned in section 6.6.1 of the API 570, 3rd edition.

of 19




570-066 D 3.1.69 Simplify definition for PWHT to: Post Weld Heat Treatment. Refer to ASME B31.3, section 300.2, "heat treatment".

D. Layman570 Ballot 1681

John Harville Delete this item.

570-067 P Address visual acuity requirement O. Konski Will be covered in 510 rewrite (for the 10th edition). Align with 510, 10th ed.

570-068 P 6.3.3 Re-title 6.3.3 to Inspection Interval Not Using RBI. D. Wang Technical Inquiry – API-570/07-01

R. Sitton Prepare a draft ballot for review at the 2011 Fall Meeting.

570-069 P Define shear wave to angle-beam and add generic API UT Examiner Qualification

510 Ballot Resolution

Use wording from 510, 10th edition.

of 19



RP 572 – INSPECTION OF PRESSURE VESSELSItem No. Status Section Subject Originator Assigned Status

Mark Geisenhoff will address all 572 scorecard items in the API 510 rewrite task group.Ryan Sitton will track the items and work the items within the 510 Rewrite TG meetings.

572-01 Incorporate the concept that removing film deposits from vessel walls may produce harmful effects such as increased corrosion. Inspector needs to use some judgment when/where appropriate to remove all deposits, etc.

Shell ballot Cover under RP 572 rewrite.

572-02 Describe plugging, leaking of weep holes in nozzle reinforcement plates. As part of external, visual inspection.


572-03 Create a section for inspection of riveted vessels as this topic is being deleted from API 510


572-04 Cover items 510-133 and 510-134 for UT G. Heath Cover under RP 572 rewrite.

572-05 Recent developments in transducer technology allow welds to be inspected for thicknesses > 0.25 in.; the thickness range should be modified to reflect this.

J. McMillanBal. 510-21-06

572-06 510 5.4.4 Potential for corrosion fatigue (especially in No-PWHTed carbon steel deaerator)

T Tahara Ballot 510-27-07

572-07 510 5.4.4 BP supports the proposal; however, adding a more clear definition of what constitutes "cyclic service" should be considered. Most vessels are subject to pressure and/or temperature changes. The magnitude and frequency are the concerns. As an alternative to a definition, perhaps adding a few examples of cyclic service vessels may be beneficial.

D Layman Ballot 510-27-

07

572-08 1 Revise the scope statement. J. Reynolds 572 Ballot 1693

of 19



572-09 3.1.31 Weld Overlay can be (and ofter is) base metal weld build-up after thinning is discovered, not just the addition of corrosion resistant filler metal - revise accordingly.

J. Reynolds 572 Ballot 1693

572-10 3.1.9 Change the size of examination point to a circle having a diameter of approximately 2-3 inches.

J. Krynicki572 Ballot 1693

572-11 4.6 Last paragraph - Delete sentence “A pressure vessel should

be maintained according to the requirements of the code under which it was designed and constructed. If rerated, it should be maintained according to the requirements of the code under which it was rerated.”

Delete sentence “The inspector should be familiar with the contents of API 510 and NB-23, where applicable.”


572-12 6.2 Add the following:"One of the most important aspects of conducting inspection planning is understanding what types of damage that can cause deterioration and therefore eventual failure of pressure vessels. Neither a valid risk assessment nor a good job of inspection planning is likely unless inspectors doing the inspection planning know what are all the possible and probable causes of failure in each piece of equipment in each operating environment. Most of these degradation phenomena are covered in sufficient detail in API RP 571. Every inspector should have access to a copy in order for the operating site to make headway on preventing predictable materials, corrosion, and other causes of equipment failures."


of 19



572-13 7.1 Rewrite the whole section. Proposed change: “The frequency with which a pressure vessel should be inspected depends on several factors, including the rate of deterioration, the corresponding remaining useful life, and the risk of failure. Scheduling of shutdowns for maintenance or inspection is usually arranged through the collaboration of process, maintenance, and inspection groups. Where practical, efforts should be made to schedule unit shutdowns evenly throughout the year to distribute the workload on the inspection and maintenance groups. On most units, operational performance related to equipment cleanliness and internal fouling may determine the length of a unit run; especially for towers and exchangers. Mechanical integrity, continued safe operations, and compliance with environmental regulations are important considerations in scheduling units for inspection. Occasionally, seasonal demands for certain products may make some units available for inspection and maintenance work without serious interruption of supply. New vessels should be


572-14 7.2e When process upsets go significantly beyond pre-established limits of the integrity operating window for the pressure vessels, external inspections and detailed examinations may be conducted to reassess the impact on equipment integrity of the process upset, e.g. reactor runaway conditions.


572-15 9.4.4 Add a section of Inspection for metallurgical changes and creep, including HTHA.


572-16 9.5 This whole section needs to be improved. J. Reynolds 572 Ballot 1693

572-17 9.7.1 Is it still necessary to cover hammer testing? J. Reynolds 572 Ballot 1693

of 19



572-18 9.7.2 The paragraph on pneumatic testing needs to be beefed up with safety precautions.


572-19 9.7.4 Add a section on PMI here and reference 578. J. Reynolds 572 Ballot 1693

572-20 10.5.1 Delete the 3rd paragraph: “The repair of sample holes left by a trepan or weld probe tool must be closely inspected. The weld quality in such repairs is likely to be poor unless carefully controlled. Therefore, the removal of samples for weld inspection should be avoided if possible.”


578-01 Although I agree that this issue is a good edition to our inspection standards, I don't think it fits well in 5.3.5, which is a list of "soft stuff" like knowledge and work practices for inspectors. I think it fits much better in API 578 which is now being updated.

J Reynolds Ballot 570-26-

07

John O’Brien to confirm these were handled during the rewrite.

578-02 Hot PMI 578 Rewrite

578-03 Data management 578 Rewrite

578-04 Surface cleanliness 578 Rewrite

Ray Konet to supply list of API 574 scorecard from last ballot.

574-01 The addition of paragraph 5.3.5.d is acceptable; however, the proposed paragraph following item d. includes recommended maintenance practices, which should not be part of an Inspection Code.

D Layman Ballot 570-26-

07

574-02 P Consider adding info on the design, RBI and inspection methods for pipe support

Inspection Summit 2011

574-03 P 5 Add a section covering inspection of flex hoses. Moved from 570-057

Clay White/ Agree this should be incorporated. Clay to provide a draft ballot for review at the 2011 Fall Meeting. Move this to 574, instead of 570.

of 19



575-01 P Add inspection guidelines for refrigerated tanks constructed to 625.

575 2nd edition Ballot

Resolution

580-01 . Editorial comments on sections 1.2, 2.1, 2.3, 2.6, 5.1, 5.2, 5.4, 5.5, 5.6, 6.3.1, 6.3.2, 6.8, 7.1, 7.2, and 7.2.7

C. White580 Ballot 1676

Clay White / Lisa Roberts

Review these comments and compile for review.

580-02 10.4.4 Inspection, examination, and testing procedures need to be identified to ensure the work is carried out in the prescribed matter to detect damage and deficiencies.Need a criterion on whether plant procedures for inspection, examination, and testing were followed by both plant and contract personnel.

R. Dolejs580 Ballot 1676

580-03 Editorial comments on sections 10.2, 11.4 and 15.3.1 D. Wang580 Ballot 1676

580-04 “shall” vs “should”

of 19

mycommittees.api.orgmycommittees.api.org/standards/cre/sci/shared docume… · web...

Documents