doc.: ieee 802.11-11/0133r2 submission january 2011 bruce kraemer, marvellslide 1 smart grid update ...

January 2011

Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Slide 1

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

Smart Grid Update – January 2011

Date: 2011-January-20

Abstract: NIST PAP#2 StatusAustralian Smart Metering

Name Company Address Phone emailBruce Kraemer Marvell 5488 Marvell Lane,

Santa Clara, CA, 95054+1-321-751-3988 [email protected]

January 2011


Slide 2

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

Thursday Meeting TopicsTopic Agenda

PAP2 Action required by Jan 28 Awareness Tuesday & text review Thursday

Australian Smart Metering

Action required by Feb 11 Awareness Tuesday & text review Thursday

January 2011


Slide 3

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

Abstract: This work area investigates the strengths, weaknesses, capabilities, and constraints of existing and emerging standards-based physical media for wireless communications. The approach is to work with the appropriate standard development organizations (SDOs) to determine the characteristics of each technology for Smart Grid application areas and types. Results are used to assess the appropriateness of wireless communications technologies for meeting Smart Grid applications.

http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/bin/view/SmartGrid/PAP02Wireless

January 2011


Slide 4

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

NIST Timeline (Anticipated)

Release of draft 0.6

Draft 0.5July 28, 2010

Call for Input to Section 6August 4, 2010

End of draft 0.5 review periodSeptember 15, 2010

December 3, 2010

November 4, 2010 OpenSG + PAP2 meeting, Fort Lauderdale

SGIP face-to-face, St LouisTentative PAP 2 meeting

September 16, 2010

End of draft 0.6 review period

September 30, 2010

October 29, 2010

Release of Version 1January 15, 2011

Extended edit period

Release of Version 2June/July 2011

Continuation of project to extend findings

January 2011


Slide 5

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

• Version 1.0 released Jan 13, 2011• http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/pub/

SmartGrid/PAP02Objective3/NIST_PAP2_Guidelines_for_Assessing_Wireless_Standards_for_Smart_Grid_Applications_1.0.pdf

January 2011


Slide 6

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

PAP#2 Report - Voting/Response guidelines

• Vote response due date Friday Jan 28.– Vote/comments not required to be completed today am1 but can we

agree on direction?– Allows up to 8 days to formulate response

• Only yes/no vote expected.– Comments can be supplied if desired but there is no definitive or

immediate plan to respond. Comments received will be archived for consideration during preparation of Version 2 report.

• Lack of response is deemed to be acceptance.

January 2011


Slide 7

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

Recommendation (Tuesday)

• Establish awareness of Report Revision 1 on Tuesday• Request members review contents between Tues & Thurs• Identify volunteers willing to prepare submission• Return on Thursday with suggestions and voting position• Thursday, review procedure to submit individual votes for

those on the mailing list• Review procedure to submit official 802 vote

• Initial Proposal: Based upon current document and expected project continuation, best option is to vote yes, supply comments on version 1 where needed, continue to refine in Version 2

January 2011


Slide 8

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

Comment Collection (Thursday)

1. Member comments• The matrix V6-r1 supplied as part of the 802 commentary

was not included• There is no technology specific Appendix for 802.15

January 2011


Slide 9

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

Recommendation (Thursday)1. Collect member comments2. Consider voting options• Yes with no comments• Yes with non-binding comments• No with willingness to change to Yes if certain conditions are met

• Thursday, review procedure to submit individual votes for those on the mailing list

• Review procedure to submit 802 group vote• Option 1: Make no group decision today – allow more time to read

document & collect comments - convene conf call next week to decide• Option 2: Make no effort to formulate group position - just provide

individual votes• Option 3:???

January 2011


Slide 10

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

Recommendation (Thursday) - Outcome1. Continue to solicit members to read and comment on PAP#2

Report V12. Considered voting options without making decision:• Yes with no comments• Yes with non-binding comments• No with willingness to change to Yes if certain conditions are met

• Review procedure to submit 802 group vote• Preferred Option: Make no group decision today – allow more

time to read document & collect comments - convene conf call Jan 26 to review comments and voting positions.

January 2011


Slide 11

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

• Australia has issued a call for candidates for their Smart Metering HAN

• Responses from 802 should be provided– Probably best from individual WG, e.g 802.11, 802.15, 802.16

– http://share.aemo.com.au/smartmetering/default.aspx

January 2011


Slide 12

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

Australian HAN RFI

• The schedule for the RFI is as follows:

• 20 December 2010 Issue the RFI to standards organisations

• 21 January 2011 Standards organisations to register their participation via email

• 31 January 2011 Closing date for questions

• 11 February 2011 Submissions due date

• 14 to 25 February 2011 Preparation of initial evaluation and first draft of review to be sent to the BRWG

• 28 February 2011 Issue RFI draft evaluation to the BRWG

• 8-9 March 2011 First BRWG workshop review

• 10-18 March 2011 BRWG's HAN Technical Group work (as required)

• 5-6 April 2011Final BRWG workshop review

• 12 April 2011 Submission of the RFI report and Smart Metering Infrastructure Functionality Specification Change Control to the NSSC

• 20 April 2011 NSSC meeting

• May 2011 Issue HAN interface standard report to the MCE's SCO

http://share.aemo.com.au/smartmetering/Pages/BRWG.aspx

January 2011


Slide 13

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

Proposed Project Plan• 802.11 submitted notification of intent to respond.• Use Jan 12 call to raise awareness • Use Tuesday Smart Grid to

– Begin coordination with 802.15, 802.11– Determine if there are any questions– Identify author volunteers – prepare initial responses

• Return on Thursday to review questions/contributions• Use reflector and subsequent calls to finalize responses

prior to Friday Feb 11 deadline• Possible Wed call slots: Jan 26, Feb 2, Feb 9

January 2011


Slide 14

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

3.1 Standard Organization and governance1. Please describe the association/alliance.2. Please describe the governance structure of the association/alliance3. Describe relationships with other alliance bodies4. Who is eligible for membership of the association/alliance and how

much does it cost to be a member?5. Please list major members of the alliance? 6. Please describe the standard.7. Which layers of the OSI stack does the standard cover?8. Describe the change control process, specifically how is the standard

managed? Please include who can initiate changes and how they initiate changes to the standard?

9. How does a developer obtain a copy of the standard and how much does it cost?

10. What tools are provided for developers and the cost of these tools?11. What is the licensing structure and detail any licence fees? 12. Describe the maturity of the standard in terms of history of releases.

January 2011


Slide 15

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

7.9.1.17.9.1.1 HAN Device Managementa) The meter shall be capable of performing as the ESI for the utility HAN.b) The SMI shall support a means of securely registering HAN Devices to the ESI. Only

registered HAN Devices shall be allowed to share information with the ESI and other HAN Devices on the utility HAN.

c) The SMI shall support the registration of 16 individual HAN Devices on the utility HAN.

d) The ESI shall be able to register more than one meter on the utility HAN e) The ESI shall be able to register other utility meter types on the utility HAN.f) The SMI shall be able to individually communicate with each registered HAN Device on

the utility HAN.g) The SMI shall be able to upgrade the software in a registered HAN Device[1] on the

utility HAN including the ESIh) The ESI shall be able to determine received signal strength at a registered HAN Device

on the utility HAN (for diagnostic purposes). i) The SMI shall support the setting of a commencement date. This shall be used by:

i. meters to ensure that HAN Devices cannot access data stored before the specified commencement date (this ensures HAN Devices cannot access historical data stored in meters before the specified date)

ii. The ESI to ensure that HAN Devices cannot access information received before the specified commencement date.

January 2011


Slide 16

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

Additional Questions on supported functionality

1. Please detail the different tariff structures supported by the standard (for example TOU, Block, CPP etc.) Tariffs need to support half hour pricing

2. Please provide details of how the standard could be used to support customers setting a maximum price per kWh that they are prepared to pay. What happens when the price exceeds the setting?

3. Please describe the options for load control currently supported in the standard.

4. How does the standard support customer options for opt-in/opt-out of load control programs?

5. Detail how the standard addresses concerns about synchronized switching of customer load?

6. How does the standard support the provision of consumption/generation information with Current Transformer connected meters?

January 2011


Slide 17

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

3.3 Physical Architecture1. The NSSC feels that there is a need to support both RF and power-line

communications. Please describe physical transmission media supported by the standard. For each please outline the typical range and throughput that can be expected. What are the typical constraints that may limit the expected range?

2. The Australian Communications and Media Authority assign the frequency range available for use by different devices. For the physical communications media described above please detail the specific frequency range used by the standard.

3. Please describe what limits the number of devices that can be supported on a home area network.

4. Please describe the home area network topology and architecture. For example how the network is formed, this should cover the types of devices, the need for a network coordinator, ability for nodes to work as repeaters and access control.

5. How does the standard ensure that collocated networks are isolated from each other (cannot share information) and do not interfere with each other?

6. What measures have been taken to avoid interference from other devices?7. What measures have been taken to avoid interfering with other devices?8. What is the practical data speed of communications between HAN devices?

January 2011


Slide 18

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

3.4 Testing and Certification Requirements1. Please describe the certification process used to validate that all devices

comply with the standard?2. Are different HAN functions (load control, IHD) certified separately?3. Please detail which parts of the standard are validated during the

testing. Is there an option to certify more functionality?4. Please describe how the certification process includes tests for

interoperability.5. At December 2010 how many products (by make and model) have been

certified to the standard? 6. Please list the manufacturers who have already certified products.7. Does the standard body provide a means to allow utilities to check

details of certified devices (e.g. an audit website)?8. How many certification test sites are currently available? Where are

these certification sites located?9. What are the requirements to establish a (local) testing authority?10. Please provide an indicative cost to undertake the testing.

January 2011


Slide 19

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

Questions (due by Jan 31)• Proposed question #1• Some portions of the HAN RFI can be read as requests information while

others read as a vendor procurement specification. The technology contained in a complete Smart Metering HAN system cannot be provided by any single SDO and would need to be provided by a wide variety of Standards Organizations.

• Standards created by IEEE such as those in the 802 family (e.g. 802.3, 802.11, 802.15, 802.16) contain specifications for only ISO layers 1 and 2. Layers 3 and 4 for protocols such as TCP/IP are provided by IETF. Several of the questions refer to transfer of smart metering protocol messages at layers 5-7 that would be contained in a higher level protocol specification developed by yet another organization outside IEEE 802 such as ZigBee and their Smart Energy Profile 2.0 SEP 2.0.

• Additionally, testing and certification is typically provided by a trade organizations such as ZigBee and the WI-Fi Alliance.

• We propose to explicitly answer a portion of the questions that relate to technology under our direct control and refer to other technology sources for the remainder of the responses. Do you have any comments on our approach?

January 2011


Slide 20

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

Questions (due by Jan 31)-Rev• Proposed question #1• Some portions of the HAN RFI can be read as a request for standards information

while others read as a vendor procurement specification. The technology contained in a complete Smart Metering HAN system cannot be provided by any single SDO and would need to be provided by a wide variety of Standards Organizations.

• Standards created by IEEE such as those in the 802 family (e.g. 802.3, 802.11, 802.15, 802.16) contain specifications for only ISO layers 1 and 2. Layers 3 and 4 for protocols such as TCP/IP are provided by IETF. Several of the questions refer to transfer of smart metering protocol messages at layers 5-7 that would be contained in a higher level protocol specification developed by yet another organization outside IEEE 802 such as ZigBee and their Smart Energy Profile 2.0 (SEP 2.0).

• Additionally, testing and certification is typically provided by a trade organizations such as ZigBee , Bluetooth SIG, WiMAX, and the Wi-Fi Alliance.

• We propose to explicitly answer a portion of the questions that relate to technology under our direct control and either respond with not applicable (N/A) or refer to other trade and technology sources for the remainder of the responses.

• Do you have any comments on our approach?

January 2011


Slide 21

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

Group conclusion

• Agreed that the revised question to Australia should be further developed by the 802 WGs and ideally sent as one question from the collective group.

• If that approach is not feasible, at least expect each WG to submit a similarly worded question.

• WG chairs will refine the language in time to respond by the Jan 31 deadline. Given the US - Australia time offset and that Jan 31 is Monday the 802 WGs completion date should be Friday Jan 28.

January 2011


Slide 22

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

January 2011


Slide 23

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

Tuesday Meeting TopicsTopic Agenda

PAP2 Action required by Jan 28 Awareness Tuesday & text review Thursday

Australian Smart Metering

Action required by Feb 11 Awareness Tuesday & text review Thursday

P2030 Information onlySponsor ballot enrollment required by March 08

Tuesday only

UK Consultation Information onlyNo action required this week

Tuesday only

SGIP Information onlyNo action required this week

Tuesday only

ITU FG-Smart Information onlyNo action required this week

Tuesday only

January 2011


Slide 24

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

Smart Grid ad hoc – Recent Documents

Document * Document topic

0028-r1 January Call

1396-r3 Submission to NIST for PAP#2

1385-r1 Closing report for Nov 2010

1316-r4 Meeting document for Nov 2010

* Structure of 802.11 document titles is 11-YR-doc#-re https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/documents

https://mentor.ieee.org/802.11/documents

January 2011


Slide 25

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

Abstract: This work area investigates the strengths, weaknesses, capabilities, and constraints of existing and emerging standards-based physical media for wireless communications. The approach is to work with the appropriate standard development organizations (SDOs) to determine the characteristics of each technology for Smart Grid application areas and types. Results are used to assess the appropriateness of wireless communications technologies for meeting Smart Grid applications.



January 2011


Slide 26

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

NIST PAP#2

Project Team • NIST Lead: David Su, [email protected]; Nada Golmie, [email protected] • EnerNex Technical Champion Lead: Joe Hughes [email protected] • CSWG Liaison: Alan Greenburg • SGAC Liaison: Skip Ashton • SDO Leads: ISA SP100, IEEE 802, IETF, TIA, ATIS, UTC

http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/bin/view/SmartGrid/PAP02Wireless?sortcol=0;table=8;up=0#sorted_table

mailto:[email protected]


http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/bin/view/SmartGrid/EnerNex


http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/bin/view/SmartGrid/CSWG

January 2011


Slide 27

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

NIST Timeline


Release of Version 1




December 3, 2010

November 4, 2010

SGIP face-to-face, ChicagoPAP 2 meeting

OpenSG meeting, MiamiTentative PAP 2 meeting


September 16, 2010


September 30, 2010

October 29, 2010

January 2011


Slide 28

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

NIST Timeline (Anticipated)





December 3, 2010

November 4, 2010 OpenSG + PAP2 meeting, Fort Lauderdale


September 16, 2010


September 30, 2010

October 29, 2010

Release of Version 1January 15, 2011

Extended edit period

Release of Version 2June/July 2011

Continuation of project to extend findings

January 2011


Slide 29

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

PAP#2 Reports was updated Oct 1• Version 0.6 released Oct 1, 2010• http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/pub/SmartGrid/PAP

02Wireless/NIST_Priority_Action_Plan_2_r06.pdf

• Version 1.0 released Jan 13, 2011• http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/pub/SmartGrid/

PAP02Objective3/NIST_PAP2_Guidelines_for_Assessing_Wireless_Standards_for_Smart_Grid_Applications_1.0.pdf

http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/pub/SmartGrid/PAP02Objective3/NIST_PAP2_Guidelines_for_Assessing_Wireless_Standards_for_Smart_Grid_Applications_1.0.pdf

http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/pub/SmartGrid/PAP02Wireless/NIST_Priority_Action_Plan_2_r06.pdf

http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/pub/SmartGrid/PAP02Wireless/NIST_Priority_Action_Plan_2_r06.pdf

January 2011


Slide 30

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

NIST PAP2 – Report Version 1

Table of ContentsREVISION

HISTORY ............................................................................................................................... V

PREFACE ........................................................................................................................................... ‐ 1 ‐

1 OVERVIEW OF THE PROCESS ..................................................................................................... ‐ 3 ‐

2 ACRONYMS AND DEFINITIONS .................................................................................................. ‐ 4 ‐

2.1 ACRONYMS ...................................................................................................................................... 4 ‐ ‐2.2 DEFINITIONS .................................................................................................................................... 8 ‐ ‐3 SMART GRID CONCEPTUAL MODEL AND BUSINESS FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS ..................

‐ 13 ‐3.1 SMART GRID CONCEPTUAL REFERENCE DIAGRAMS ................................................................................. 13 ‐ ‐3.2 LIST OF ACTORS ............................................................................................................................... 16 ‐ ‐3.3 SMART GRID USE CASES .................................................................................................................... 18 ‐ ‐3.4 SMART GRID BUSINESS FUNCTIONAL AND VOLUMETRIC REQUIREMENTS .................................................... 20 ‐ ‐3.5 USE OF SMART GRID USER APPLICATIONS’ QUANTITATIVE REQUIREMENTS FOR PAP 2 TASKS ........................ 22 ‐ ‐3.6 ADAPTATION OF SG NETWORK TF’S REQUIREMENTS TABLE DATA FOR USE IN NETWORK MODELING TOOLS .... 23 ‐ ‐3.7 SECURITY ....................................................................................................................................... 30 ‐ ‐

January 2011


Slide 31

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

NIST PAP2 – Report Version 14 WIRELESS TECHNOLOGY ......................................................................................................... ‐ 31 ‐4.1 TECHNOLOGY DESCRIPTOR HEADINGS .................................................................................................. 31 ‐ ‐4.2 TECHNOLOGY DESCRIPTOR DETAILS ..................................................................................................... 32 ‐ ‐4.2.1 Descriptions of Groups 1‐7 Submissions ........................................................................... ‐ 32 ‐4.2.1.1 Group 1: Link Availability ...................................................................................................... 33 ‐ ‐4.2.1.2 Group 2: Data/Media Type Supported ................................................................................... 33 ‐ ‐4.2.1.3 Group 3: Coverage Area ......................................................................................................... 33 ‐ ‐4.2.1.4 Group 4: Mobility ................................................................................................................... 34 ‐ ‐4.2.1.5 Group 5: Data Rates ............................................................................................................... 34 ‐ ‐4.2.1.6 Group 6: RF Utilization ........................................................................................................... 34 ‐ ‐4.2.1.7 Group 7: Data Frames and Packets ........................................................................................ 36 ‐ ‐4.2.2 Descriptions of Groups 8‐12 Submissions ......................................................................... ‐ 36 ‐4.2.2.1 Group 8: Link Quality Optimization ........................................................................................ 36 ‐ ‐4.2.2.2 Group 9: Radio Performance Measurement & Management ................................................ 37 ‐ ‐4.2.2.3 Group 10: Power Management.............................................................................................. 37 ‐ ‐4.2.2.4 Group 11: Connection Topologies .......................................................................................... 37 ‐ ‐4.2.2.5 Group 12: Connection Management ..................................................................................... 37 ‐ ‐4.2.3 Descriptions of Groups 13‐20 Submissions ....................................................................... ‐ 37 ‐4.2.3.1 Group 13: QoS and Traffic Prioritization ................................................................................ 38 ‐ ‐4.2.3.2 Group 14: Location Characterization ..................................................................................... 38 ‐ ‐4.2.3.3 Group 15: Security and Security Management ...................................................................... 38 ‐ ‐4.2.3.4 Group 16: Radio Environment ................................................................................................ 39 ‐ ‐4.2.3.5 Group 17: Intra technology Coexistence ............................................................................... 39 ‐ ‐ ‐4.2.3.6 Group 18: Inter technology Coexistence ............................................................................... 39 ‐ ‐ ‐4.2.3.7 Group 19: Unique Device Identification ................................................................................. 39 ‐ ‐4.2.3.8 Group 20: Technology Specification Source ........................................................................... 40 ‐ ‐4.2.4 Descriptions of Group 21 Submission ............................................................................... ‐ 40 ‐4.2.4.1 Group 21 Description ............................................................................................................. 40 ‐ ‐4.3 TECHNOLOGY SUBMISSION TITLES ....................................................................................................... 41 ‐ ‐

January 2011


Slide 32

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission


5 MODELING AND EVALUATION APPROACH .............................................................................. ‐ 41 ‐

5.1 ASSESSMENT OF WIRELESS TECHNOLOGIES AGAINST SMART GRID BUSINESS APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ...... 41 ‐ ‐5.1.1 Initial Screening ................................................................................................................ ‐ 42 ‐iii5.1.2 Perform Refinements to Initial Screening ......................................................................... ‐ 42 ‐5.1.2.1 Mathematical Models ............................................................................................................ 42 ‐ ‐5.1.2.2 Simulation Models ................................................................................................................. 42 ‐ ‐5.1.2.3 Testbeds ................................................................................................................................ 42 ‐ ‐5.1.2.4 Network Design ...................................................................................................................... 43 ‐ ‐5.2 MODELING FRAMEWORK ................................................................................................................... 43 ‐ ‐5.2.1 Channel Propagation Models ........................................................................................... ‐ 44 ‐5.2.1.1 Generic Model ....................................................................................................................... 45 ‐ ‐5.2.1.2 Outdoor Channel Models ....................................................................................................... 46 ‐ ‐5.2.1.2.1 The Hata Model: ............................................................................................................... 46 ‐ ‐5.2.1.2.2 Modified Hata (aka COST 231 Model): ............................................................................. 47 ‐ ‐5.2.1.2.3 Erceg Model: ..................................................................................................................... 47 ‐ ‐5.2.2 Coverage and Range Analysis ........................................................................................... ‐ 50 ‐5.2.3 Physical Layer Model ........................................................................................................ ‐ 53 ‐5.2.4 MAC Sublayer Model ........................................................................................................ ‐ 53 ‐5.2.5 Multilink Model ................................................................................................................. ‐ 55 ‐

January 2011


Slide 33

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission


6 FACTORS TO CONSIDER IN DETERMINING PERFORMANCE ...................................................... ‐ 56 ‐

6.1 PERFORMANCE METRICS AND USER APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ............................................................ 57 ‐ ‐6.2 THE COVERAGE CAPACITY TRADEOFF ................................................................................................... 57 ‐ ‐ ‐6.3 EXTENDING COVERAGE WITH MULTI HOP COMMUNICATIONS .................................................................. 61 ‐ ‐ ‐6.4 THE EFFECT OF THE WIRELESS LINK ENVIRONMENT ................................................................................. 62 ‐ ‐6.5 THE EFFECT OF INTERFERENCE ............................................................................................................ 64 ‐ ‐7

CONCLUSIONS ........................................................................................................................ ‐ 66 ‐

8 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................... ‐ 68 ‐

January 2011


Slide 34

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission


9 BIBLIOGRAPHY ....................................................................................................................... ‐ 68 ‐

ANNEX A IEEE 802.11 ............................................................................................................... ‐ 69 ‐

A.1 LINK TRAFFIC MODEL ................................................................................................................... 69 ‐ ‐A.2 PHYSICAL LAYER MODEL ............................................................................................................... 69 ‐ ‐A.3 MAC LAYER MODEL .................................................................................................................... 69 ‐ ‐A.4 MULTILINK MODEL ...................................................................................................................... 70 ‐ ‐A.5 PARAMETERS AND ASSUMPTIONS USED IN THE NUMERICAL EXAMPLES .................................................. 70 ‐ ‐A.6 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................... 72 ‐ ‐ANNEX B 3GPP LONG TERM EVOLUTION

(LTE) .......................................................................... ‐ 74 ‐B.1 MODELING APPROACH AND ASSUMPTIONS ...................................................................................... 74 ‐ ‐B.2 CHANNEL PROPAGATION MODEL ................................................................................................... 76 ‐ ‐B.3 COVERAGE ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................... 76 ‐ ‐B.4 CAPACITY ANALYSIS ..................................................................................................................... 77 ‐ ‐B.4.1 Sector Capacity ................................................................................................................. ‐ 77

‐B.4.2 Available Throughput per Smart Meter ............................................................................ ‐ 79 ‐B.5 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................... 81 ‐ ‐

January 2011


Slide 35

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission


ANNEX C 3GPP HIGH SPEED PACKET ACCESS (HSPA) ................................................................. ‐ 82 ‐

C.1 MODELING APPROACH AND ASSUMPTIONS ........................................................................................... 82 ‐ ‐C.2 ANALYSIS ....................................................................................................................................... 83 ‐ ‐C.3 CAPACITY LIMITED AND COVERAGE LIMITED SCENARIOS ........................................................................... 84 ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐C.3.1 Scenario 1: Capacity‐limited system ................................................................................. ‐ 84 ‐C.3.2 Scenario 2: Coverage‐limited system ................................................................................ ‐ 85 ‐ANNEX D CDMA2000 1X AND HIGH RATE PACKET DATA

(HRPD) ............................................... ‐ 86 ‐ivD.1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 86 ‐ ‐D.2 SYSTEM MODEL .......................................................................................................................... 86 ‐ ‐D.3 TRAFFIC BETWEEN DAP AND AMI HEAD END .................................................................................... 88 ‐ ‐D.4 NUMBER OF METERS IN A CDMA2000 1X OR HRPD SECTOR ............................................................ 96 ‐ ‐D.5 CDMA2000 1X AND HRPD SYSTEM THROUGHPUT .......................................................................... 96 ‐ ‐D.6 CONCLUSION .............................................................................................................................. 97 ‐ ‐D.7 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................... 97 ‐ ‐ANNEX E IEEE 802.16/WIMAX

NETWORK ..................................................................................... ‐ 99 ‐E.1 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................. 104 ‐ ‐

January 2011


Slide 36

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

PAP#2 Report - Voting/Response guidelines

• Vote response established as Friday Jan 28.• Only yes/no vote expected.• Comments can be supplied if desired but there is no

definitive or immediate plan to respond. Comments received will be archived for consideration during preparation of Version 2 report.

• Lack of response is deemed to be acceptance.

January 2011


Slide 37

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

Recommendation




January 2011


Slide 38

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

• Australia has issued a call for candidates for their Smart Metering HAN

• Responses from 802 should be provided– Probably best from individual WG, e.g 802.11, 802.15, 802.16

– http://share.aemo.com.au/smartmetering/default.aspx

http://share.aemo.com.au/smartmetering/default.aspx

January 2011


Slide 39

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

Australian HAN RFI• Request for information– home area network (HAN) interface standard• The NSSC is required under its terms of reference to provide advice to

the Ministerial Council on Energy's (MCE's) Standing Committee of Officials (SCO) on an open standard to support the provision of a home area network (HAN) for customers using the smart metering infrastructure.The NSSC has issued a request for information (RFI) to standard organisations to provide information on the capabilities of their HAN standard to meet the minimum functionality requirements for a HAN.The objectives of the RFI are to confirm that:

– the HAN minimum functionality requirements (section 7.9 of the Smart Metering Infastructure Minimum Functionality Specification, version 1.1) are clearly understood and unambiguously stated

– one or more standards are capable of meeting the minimum functionality requirements for a HAN interface




January 2011


Slide 40

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

Australian HAN RFI

• The schedule for the RFI is as follows:

• 20 December 2010 Issue the RFI to standards organisations

• 21 January 2011 Standards organisations to register their participation via email

• 31 January 2011 Closing date for questions

• 11 February 2011 Submissions due date

• 14 to 25 February 2011 Preparation of initial evaluation and first draft of review to be sent to the BRWG

• 28 February 2011 Issue RFI draft evaluation to the BRWG

• 8-9 March 2011 First BRWG workshop review

• 10-18 March 2011 BRWG's HAN Technical Group work (as required)

• 5-6 April 2011Final BRWG workshop review

• 12 April 2011 Submission of the RFI report and Smart Metering Infrastructure Functionality Specification Change Control to the NSSC

• 20 April 2011 NSSC meeting

• May 2011 Issue HAN interface standard report to the MCE's SCO




January 2011


Slide 41

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

Proposed Project Plan• 802.11 submitted notification of intent to respond.• Use Jan 12 call to raise awareness • Use Tuesday Smart Grid to

– Coordinate with 802.15– Determine if there are any questions– Identify author volunteers – prepare initial responses

• Return on Thursday to review contributions• Use reflector and subsequent calls to finalize responses

prior to Friday Feb 11 deadline• Possible Wed call slots: Jan 19, Jan 26, Feb 2, Feb 9

January 2011


Slide 42

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

Recommendation




January 2011


Slide 43

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

• IEEE P2030™/D.4.0 2 Draft Guide for Smart Grid 3 Interoperability of Energy 4 Technology and Information 5 Technology Operation With the 6 Electric Power System (EPS), and 7 End-Use Applications and Loads

January 2011


Slide 44

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

P2030

• 17-JAN-2011 17:32:44 ET• When completed, P2030 will provide guidelines for

smart grid interoperability. It will provide an knowldege base addressing terminology, charateristics, functional performance and evaluation criteria, and the application of engineering principles for smart grid interoperability of the electric power system with end-use applications and loads. It will also discuss alternate approaches to good practices for the smart grid.

•

January 2011


Slide 45

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

P2030

• IEEE P2030 Working Group Meeting• February 22-23, 2011 • IEEE P2030.1 • February 24, 2011 • Draft Agenda (1/13/11) • New Orleans, Louisiana• Agenda Summary: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 – P2030 WG Meeting: 8:30 a.m. –

5:00 p.m. Wednesday, February 23, 2011 – P2030 WG Meeting: 8:30

a.m. – 5:00 p.m. Thursday, February 24, 2011 – P2030.2 WG Meeting: 8:30 a.m.

– 5:00 p.m.

January 2011


Slide 46

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/133r0

Submission

P2030IMPORTANT! To participate, you must have access to myProject through an IEEE Web Account.

If you would like to participate in IEEE Standards Sponsor Ballot P2030you must enroll as a member of the ballot group by 08-Mar-2011, 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time.

Title: Guide for Smart Grid Interoperability of Energy Technology and Information Technology Operation With the Electric Power System (EPS), and End-Use Applications and Loads

***** IEEE STANDARD DOCUMENT INFORMATION *****The IEEE-SASB Coordinating Committees Society/Guide for Smart Grid Interoperability of Energy Technology and Information Technology Operation With the Electric Power System (EPS), and End-Use Applications and Loads invites you to participate in the New Sponsor Ballot for:P2030Title: Guide for Smart Grid Interoperability of Energy Technology and Information Technology Operation With the Electric Power System (EPS), and End-Use Applications and LoadsScope: This document provides guidelines for smart grid interoperability. This guide provides a knowledge base addressing terminology, characteristics, functional performance and evaluation criteria, and the application of engineering principles for smart grid interoperability of the electric power system with end use applications and loads. The guide discusses alternate approaches to good practices for the smart grid. Purpose: This standard provides guidelines in understanding and defining smart grid interoperability of the electric power system with end-use applications and loads. Integration of energy technology and information and communications technology is necessary to achieve seamless operation for electric generation, delivery, and end-use benefits to permit two way power flow with communication and control. Interconnection and intra-facing frameworks and strategies with design definitions are addressed in this standard, providing guidance in expanding the current knowledge base. This expanded knowledge base is needed as a key element in grid architectural designs and operation to promote a more reliable and flexible electric power system.

***** MESSAGE FROM THE WORKING GROUP CHAIR *****

Please feel free to forward this invitation to other interested stakeholders. Further background information on P2030 may be found at http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/scc21/2030/2030_index.html and further IEEE standards information at http://standards.ieee.org/develop/

January 2011


Slide 47

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

Smart Metering Implementation Programme: prospectus status

Formal written consultation has closed and is awaiting publication of the Government’s response.(1 of 21 consultations in similar state)

UK aim is to provide a summary of public responses to consultation within three months of the closing date.

http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/consultations/consultations.aspx

January 2011


Slide 48

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/133r0

Submission

UK Smart Metering - Introduction• Reference Number: 10D/732

Open Date: 2010-07-27Close Date:

• On 27 July 2010, the Government with Ofgem published a Prospectus containing proposals for the delivery of electricity and gas smart metering in Great Britain. This covers both domestic households and small and medium non-domestic sites.

• The Prospectus document, which represents the joint views of the Department of Energy and Climate Change (DECC) and the Gas and Electricity Markets Authority (GEMA), sets out proposals for and asks for views on how smart metering will be delivered, including on issues relating to:

– the minimum requirements for meters and displays – the establishment of central communications and data services – data privacy and security issues – the regulatory and commercial framework – the approach to small and medium sites in the non-domestic sector – consumer protection – the approach to rollout and – the implementation strategy

http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/consultations/smart_mtr_imp/smart_mtr_imp.aspx


January 2011


Slide 49

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/133r0

Submission

UK Consultation documents

• Consultation documents• Smart Metering implementation programme

: prospectus - letter to consultees Size: [50 KB] File Type: [.doc]• Smart Metering implementation programme: prospectus

document Size: [786 KB] File Type: [.pdf]


http://www.decc.gov.uk/Media/viewfile.ashx?FilePath=Consultations/smart-meter-imp-prospectus/219-smart-metering-letter-consultees.doc&filetype=4&minwidth=true





January 2011


Slide 50

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

5151

CATALOG OF STANDARDS (STATUS OF WORK IN CATALOG OF STANDARDS (STATUS OF WORK IN PROGRESS)PROGRESS)

Initial Document under review by the SGIP board

5252

• Process– NIST Framework and Roadmap for SG Interoperability v1.0 identifies many standards to consider– Additional standards can be identified to the SGIP Administrator by any SGIP member for potential

inclusion in catalog– Relevance and importance evaluated by appropriate SGIP working group (e.g. DEWG, PAP, etc) and

consensus developed– 75% approval by SGIP membership required prior to SGIPGB approval for inclusion in the catalog– Standards included in the catalog may be deprecated from further use to changes in technology or

needs by following the same process.

• Catalog Structure– Entries in catalog to be structured based on application domain defined in the Framework and

further classified by GWAC stack

• Relationship to NIST and FERC lists– Standards Catalog strives for accurate characterization and relevance to the smart grid community,

and avoids recommendation– Standards Catalog expected to be a larger compilation which can inform NIST and FERC in their

decision processes

CATALOG OF STANDARDS: PROCESS & CATALOG OF STANDARDS: PROCESS & STRUCTURESTRUCTURE

5353

• SGIP Catalog of Standards • The catalog is a compendium of standards and practices considered to be

appropriate for the development and deployment of a robust and interoperable Smart Grid. The catalog may contain multiple entries that may accomplish the goals and are functionality equivalent; similarly a single standards entry may contain optional elements that need not be implemented by all implementations. In general, compliance with a standard does not guarantee interoperability due to the above reasons or due to vagueness or under-specification in the base document.

• The SGIP as a part of its work program is defining a testing and certification program that may be applied to the standards listed in the catalog and that, if applied, will substantiate that implementations claiming compliance with the respective standards are also interoperable. Where test profiles have been defined for a particular standard this will be indicated in the catalog entry.

http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/bin/view/SmartGrid/SGIPCatalogOfStandards

http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/bin/view/SmartGrid/SGIP

http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/bin/view/SmartGrid/SGIP

January 2011


Slide 54

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

NIST PAPZZ – AMI Security Subgroup• Abstract • This priority action plan will lead to development of a standardized of a set of advanced

metering infrastructure (AMI) security requirements by a formally recognized Standards Development Organization (SDO) or a selected Standards Setting Organization (SSO). In performing each of its tasks, members of this priority action plan will liaison with the NIST CSWG Testing and Certification Subgroup to ensure standardized requirements facilitate the goals and objectives for testing and certification.

• To ensure the result does not become quickly obsolete and avoid inhibiting market creativity, members of this priority action plan will endeavor to find a sufficiently detailed level of specificity to make controls actionable such as specifying criteria for selection of mechanisms, protocols, and techniques; however the desired standard shall avoid prescribing sub-system design or identifying specific products or vendor names. For example, specifying criteria for identification of acceptable encryption algorithms and key sizes is appropriate, as is delineating requirements for handling of key material within a device; however dictating chip layout or code structure is below the level of specificity appropriate for this activity.

• Members of this priority action plan shall also ensure documentation developed extends the architecture and view presented in the NIST Interagency Report 7628 (“NISTIR”). Members of this priority action plan shall communicate any and all gaps between source documentation and the NISTIR identified during the development process to the relevant parent organization.

http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/bin/view/SmartGrid/AMISecurityRequirements

http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/bin/view/SmartGrid/CSWG

http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/bin/view/SmartGrid/AMISecurityRequirements

January 2011


Slide 55

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

SGIP Catalog of StandardsThe catalog is a compendium of standards and practices considered

to be appropriate for the development and deployment of a robust and interoperable Smart Grid.

The catalog may contain multiple entries that may accomplish the goals and are functionality equivalent.

The SGIP as a part of its work program is defining a testing and certification program that may be applied to the standards listed in the catalog and that, if applied, will substantiate that implementations claiming compliance with the respective standards are also interoperable.

Where test profiles have been defined for a particular standard this will be indicated in the catalog entry.

http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/bin/view/SmartGrid/SGIPCatalogOfStandards

Initial document under review by SGIP board.

January 2011


Slide 56

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

• Smart Grid Standards Information• Version 1.8 • Thursday, November 18, 2010

http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/pub/SmartGrid/SGIPCatalogOfStandards/SmartGridStandardsInformationTemplate.docx

January 2011


Slide 57

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/133r0

Submission

FG ManagementChairman: Les Brown (Lantiq, Germany) Vice-Chairman: Li Haihua (MIIT, China)

Vice-Chairman: Hyung-Soo (Hans) Kim (Korea Telecom, Korea)

Vice-Chairman: Yoshito Sakurai (Hitachi, Japan) Vice-Chairman: David Su (NIST/USA)

http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/focusgroups/smart/Pages/Default.aspx

January 2011


Slide 58

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/133r0

Submission

ITU FG Smart• ITU-T Focus Group on Smart Grid (FG Smart)• Started May 2010• The Terms of Reference of the Focus Group are available

here.• The Focus Group will,

– identify potential impacts on standards development – investigate future ITU-T study items and related actions – familiarize ITU-T and standardization communities with emerging

attributes of smart grid – encourage collaboration between ITU-T and smart grid communities

• The Focus Group will collaborate with worldwide smart grid communities (e.g., research institutes, forums, academia) including other SDOs and consortia.


http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/focusgroups/smart/Pages/tor.aspx


January 2011


Slide 59

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

FG –Smart Structure

• Writing a Document• Working Groups• 1 – Uses Cases• 2 – Requirements• 3 – Architecture

January 2011


Slide 60

doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/133r0

Submission

ITU FG SmartFourth meeting

Chicago, USA, 29 November – 3 December 2010 • Registration form • Meeting Announcement • Meeting documents

Deadline for Contributions: 25 November 2010

Fifth meetingYokohama, Japan, 10-14 January 2011

• Registration form • Meeting Announcement • Meeting documents


http://www.itu.int/cgi-bin/htsh/edrs/ITU-T/studygroup/edrs.registration.form?_eventid=3000196

http://www.itu.int/dms_pub/itu-t/oth/48/01/T48010000050001MSWE.doc

http://ifatemp.itu.int/t/fg/smart/docs/

http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/focusgroups/smart/Documents/2011-01-10/fgsmart-5fth-meet-announce.doc

http://www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/focusgroups/smart/Documents/2011-01-10/fgsmart-5fth-meet-announce.doc

http://ifatemp.itu.int/t/fg/smart/docs/1101-yok/


January 2011


Slide 61

doc.: IEEE 802.11-11/0133r2

Submission

NIST SGIP Meetings- 2011Event Date Time Location

SGIP Plenary Jan 21 1-3 pm ET Telecon

SGIP Plenary Mar 29-31 All day Nashville, TNor telecon

SGIP Board Mar 29 8am - noon Nashville, TNor telecon

SGIP Board May 12 1-4 pm ET Telecon

SGIP Plenary May 26 1-3 pm ET Telecon

http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/bin/view/SmartGrid/SGIP#SGIP_Upcoming_Meetings_Events

http://collaborate.nist.gov/twiki-sggrid/bin/view/SmartGrid/SGIP#SGIP_Upcoming_Meetings_Events