do not put content on the brand signature area multi actor impact simulation prevalent practises /...

23
Multi Actor Impact Simulation Prevalent practises / Challenges / Solutions EMTA, General Meeting Oslo – May 21st 2015 Dirk Jan van Swaay Managing Director ING Bank

Upload: curtis-parker

Post on 13-Dec-2015

222 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Do not put content on the brand signature area Multi Actor Impact Simulation Prevalent practises / Challenges / Solutions EMTA, General Meeting Oslo –

Multi Actor Impact SimulationPrevalent practises / Challenges / Solutions

EMTA, General MeetingOslo – May 21st 2015Dirk Jan van SwaayManaging Director ING Bank

Page 2: Do not put content on the brand signature area Multi Actor Impact Simulation Prevalent practises / Challenges / Solutions EMTA, General Meeting Oslo –

Multi Actor Impact Simulation – Public Transport

Agenda

1. Introduction

2. Impact Investment Global Trends

3. Good Decision Making, and quick

4. Examples Multi Actor Impact Simulation assessment tool

5. Conclusions and recommendations

6. Discussions and feedback

2

Page 3: Do not put content on the brand signature area Multi Actor Impact Simulation Prevalent practises / Challenges / Solutions EMTA, General Meeting Oslo –

Introduction

• Impact Objectives per actor vary, what is IMPACT ?• Room for improvement: Impact Accounting, Benchmark, Reporting• Funding – lending relationship to benefit• Lessons learnt building MAIS models• All actors to benefit from a common impact decision model

3

Page 4: Do not put content on the brand signature area Multi Actor Impact Simulation Prevalent practises / Challenges / Solutions EMTA, General Meeting Oslo –

Multi Actor Impact Simulation – Public Transport

Agenda

1. Introduction

2. Impact Investment Global Trends

3. Good Decision Making, and quick

4. Examples Multi Actor Impact Simulation assessment tool

5. Conclusions and recommendations

6. Discussions and feedback

4

Page 5: Do not put content on the brand signature area Multi Actor Impact Simulation Prevalent practises / Challenges / Solutions EMTA, General Meeting Oslo –

*Coined first by Antony Bugg-Levine in 2007 (Forbes, Feb - 2012)

Investments intended to create positive impact beyond financial return*

Impact Investment, Global Trends

• Exclusion• Best-in-class comparison• Selection based on market capital

Sustainability Indices

• Lack reliability• Controversial

Methodology

Purpose – set BENCHMARK

5

Page 6: Do not put content on the brand signature area Multi Actor Impact Simulation Prevalent practises / Challenges / Solutions EMTA, General Meeting Oslo –

Sustainable Indices

• Controversial methodology*• 46% Fund Managers trust DJSI• 6 Reasons Identified

• Lack of standardization• Lack of credibility of information• Biased ratings• Trade-offs• Lack of transparency• Lack of Independence

* As identified by Rate the Raters 5 phase study (2010-2014)

6

Page 7: Do not put content on the brand signature area Multi Actor Impact Simulation Prevalent practises / Challenges / Solutions EMTA, General Meeting Oslo –

Impact Investment, Global Trends

• 28 Agencies – assist on non financial reports

• Methodology

• Qualitative / Quantitative / Combination

• Detailed methodology not publically available

• Qualitative assessment examples

• Reputex / Trucost / Management & Excellence / GIIRS / Milieubarometer / GreenIntelli

7

Page 8: Do not put content on the brand signature area Multi Actor Impact Simulation Prevalent practises / Challenges / Solutions EMTA, General Meeting Oslo –

Impact Investment, Global Trends

Challenges

New Concept

Lack of Standardization

Industry Acceptance

Steps taken

Global Reporting Initiative (GRI)America (SASB) since 2011

EU proposed amendments to reporting directives

8

Page 9: Do not put content on the brand signature area Multi Actor Impact Simulation Prevalent practises / Challenges / Solutions EMTA, General Meeting Oslo –

Multi Actor Impact Simulation – Public Transport

Agenda

1. Introduction

2. Impact Investment Global Trends

3. Good Decision Making, and quick

4. Examples Multi Actor Impact Simulation assessment tool

5. Conclusions and recommendations

6. Discussions and feedback

9

Page 10: Do not put content on the brand signature area Multi Actor Impact Simulation Prevalent practises / Challenges / Solutions EMTA, General Meeting Oslo –

Good Decision Making, and quick

TCO

PTA

OEMs

Consumer/

passengerPTO

Banks

Lease

12 november 2014

10

NGO’s

Knowledge Institutes

Energy Suppliers

Infrastructure

MAIS

Page 11: Do not put content on the brand signature area Multi Actor Impact Simulation Prevalent practises / Challenges / Solutions EMTA, General Meeting Oslo –

12 november 2014

11

Good Decision Making, and quick

•Financial cost Social cost • Environmental cost

Page 12: Do not put content on the brand signature area Multi Actor Impact Simulation Prevalent practises / Challenges / Solutions EMTA, General Meeting Oslo –

12 november 2014 12

THEY ALL TALK AND TALK AND TALK AND TALK AND TALK AND TALK ABOUT COSTS,

but

DO THEY TALK ABOUT THE SAME COST? AND DO THEY UNDERSTAND EACHOTHER? AND DO THEY READ THE SAME AMOUNT?

AND DO THEY TAKE WISE DECISIONS?

Good Decision Making, and quick

Page 13: Do not put content on the brand signature area Multi Actor Impact Simulation Prevalent practises / Challenges / Solutions EMTA, General Meeting Oslo –

Multi Actor Impact Simulation – Public Transport

Agenda

1. Introduction

2. Impact Investment Global Trends

3. Good Decision Making, and quick

4. Examples Multi Actor Impact Simulation assessment tool

5. Conclusions and recommendations

6. Discussions and feedback

13

Page 14: Do not put content on the brand signature area Multi Actor Impact Simulation Prevalent practises / Challenges / Solutions EMTA, General Meeting Oslo –

12 november 2014 14

Examples Multi Actor Impact Simulation

Page 15: Do not put content on the brand signature area Multi Actor Impact Simulation Prevalent practises / Challenges / Solutions EMTA, General Meeting Oslo –

12 november 2014 15

Examples Multi Actor Impact Simulation

Page 16: Do not put content on the brand signature area Multi Actor Impact Simulation Prevalent practises / Challenges / Solutions EMTA, General Meeting Oslo –

12 november 2014 16

Examples Multi Actor Impact Simulation

Page 17: Do not put content on the brand signature area Multi Actor Impact Simulation Prevalent practises / Challenges / Solutions EMTA, General Meeting Oslo –

Scopes

Scope 3

All other indire

ct emissions

Scope 2From

purchased

electricity

Scope 1From own or controlled sources

17

Page 18: Do not put content on the brand signature area Multi Actor Impact Simulation Prevalent practises / Challenges / Solutions EMTA, General Meeting Oslo –

Multi Actor Impact Simulation – Public Transport

Agenda

1. Introduction

2. Impact Investment Global Trends

3. Good Decision Making, and quick

4. Examples Multi Actor Impact Simulation assessment tool

5. Conclusions and recommendations

6. Discussions and feedback

18

Page 19: Do not put content on the brand signature area Multi Actor Impact Simulation Prevalent practises / Challenges / Solutions EMTA, General Meeting Oslo –

Conclusion and Recommendation

• Return (IMPACT + Financial) converge in risk and funding• MAIS is a communication-tool between actors• The use of MAIS aims to improve decision making (quality & speed)• IMPACT needs to be made SMART

SMART: Specific, Measurable, Agreed upon, Realistic and Time-based

• MAIS is made by and for the actors only• Data and accounting rules in public domain, WiKi• Expert Panel (reps from each actor) decide on rules and data• The Dutch “polder” decision model has worked well• Daily use is convincing, and confirms the value added• Building MAIS does not have to be expensive

19

Page 20: Do not put content on the brand signature area Multi Actor Impact Simulation Prevalent practises / Challenges / Solutions EMTA, General Meeting Oslo –

Conclusion and Recommendation

• Build MAIS together with those with whom you interact• Complete MAIS model before negotiation (PTA-PTO) starts• Embed MAIS decisions and maintenance in your organisation• Ensure that MAIS data is kept up to date• Use (for free) what others have already developed• Give the tool to the users (not via a consultant)• Costs can be low and controlled (approx EUR 50k – 100k)• Costs are marginal compared to contract value• Limit Scope to what really matters

20

Page 21: Do not put content on the brand signature area Multi Actor Impact Simulation Prevalent practises / Challenges / Solutions EMTA, General Meeting Oslo –

• Need Honest, verifiable and robust assessment Evaluate options at par Set benchmark line – qualify / disqualify proposals

21

Conclusion and Recommendation

Page 22: Do not put content on the brand signature area Multi Actor Impact Simulation Prevalent practises / Challenges / Solutions EMTA, General Meeting Oslo –

<Datum>

22

Page 23: Do not put content on the brand signature area Multi Actor Impact Simulation Prevalent practises / Challenges / Solutions EMTA, General Meeting Oslo –

Multi Actor Impact Simulation – Public Transport

Agenda

1. Introduction

2. Impact Investment Global Trends

3. Good Decision Making, and quick

4. Examples Multi Actor Impact Simulation assessment tool

5. Conclusions and recommendations

6. Discussions and feedback

23