dmaic for sharing
DESCRIPTION
Using EFQM and the DMAIC Approach together.TRANSCRIPT
The EFQM Excellence Model provides a management framework that enables any organisation, regardless of size, sector or maturity, to determine their current strengths and the priority improvement areas that will enable them to more effectively implement their strategy.
The DMAIC Improvement Methodology provides a structured approach for identify and implementing appropriate solutions to address the improvement opportunities identified in an EFQM assessment.
Using both together helps focus improvement actions on achieving your strategic objectives.
©EFQM 2011
There is close alignment between the RADAR Cycle & the DMAIC process:
Define the objective
Understand the current performance
Identify the root cause and appropriate solutions
Implement the improvement
Check whether it has been effective
©EFQM 2011
The DMAIC Methodology is based on techniques commonly used in Six Sigma and Lean.
It provides a scalable tool that can be applied to relatively simple problems with limited data, such as those identified through perception surveys, through to complex, Six Sigma improvements.
The DMAIC Storyboard enables the improvement to be explained from beginning to end on a single page, aiding communication.
©EFQM 2011
Define
Analyse
Improve
Measure
Check
Clearly define the objective you want to achieve.
Include here measures and other relevant data to show the current performance.
This will be the baseline against which any improvement will be measured.
During this phase you determine the root cause of the problem. You can use a number of different problem solving tools and analytical techniques to
achieve this. At the end of this phase, you should have selected the most appropriate solution to
address the root cause you have identified.
Check whether the improvement implemented has achieved the objective originally set.
This is the implementation plan for the solution you have chosen.
It could be a simple table or a Gantt Chart, showing who is doing what and when it is due to be delivered.
©EFQM 2011
The following example is based on a real project from one of our members.
We’ve chosen this example to demonstrate DMAIC being used in a non-manufacturing environment.
It uses a 4 step approach to the “Analyse” phase, involving a group of people to brainstorm the issues, identify what they can control and suggest the improvement actions required.
©EFQM 2011
Define
Analyse
Improve
Measure
Check
The EFQM assessment identified “sharing of best practices between countries” as an opportunity to improve.
Target: 20 “best practices” implemented by the end of the year.
©EFQM 2011
Define
Analyse
Improve
Measure
Check
The EFQM assessment identified “sharing of best practices between countries” as an opportunity to improve.
Target: 20 “best practices” implemented by the end of the year.
“Best Practices” identified and recognised through annual CEO Awards.
Submission Documents circulated to all countries. No tracking in place to determine whether BP is
implemented in other countries.
©EFQM 2011
PROBLEM STATEMENT:
There is a lack of knowledge
& “best practices”
sharing across the Group
PEOPLE
ENVIRONMENT RESOURCES TIME
PROCESS SYSTEMS
Don’t have standardised
processes across Group
TQMRs have a number of
responsibilities
Perception that it takes too much time to share or
ask
Process owners don’t think about gaining external
view
Culturally we are internally focused
Don’t have a clear idea of what other companies need
No feedback afterwards to
show how information has
been used
Not clear what information needs to be shared or in what
level of detail
Different languages
Limited access to information from other companies
Not clear who is responsible for
sharing information
©EFQM 2011
PROBLEM
STATEMENT: There is a lack of
knowledge & “best practices” sharing across
the Group
PEOPLE
ENVIRONMENT RESOURCES TIME
PROCESS SYSTEMS
Perception that it takes too much time to share or
ask
Process owners don’t think about gaining external
view
Culturally we are internally focused
Don’t have standardised
processes across Group
Country Reps have a number
of responsibilities
Different languages
Don’t have a clear idea of what other
companies need
No feedback afterwards to
show how information has
been used
Not clear what information needs to be shared or in
what level of detail
Limited access to information from other companies
Not clear who is responsible for
sharing information
Can Influence Outside Control Can Control
©EFQM 2011
PROBLEM
STATEMENT: There is a lack of knowledge
sharing across the Group
PEOPLE
ENVIRONMENT RESOURCES TIME
PROCESS SYSTEMS
Don’t have a clear idea of what other
companies need
No feedback afterwards to
show how information has
been used
Not clear what information needs to be shared or in
what level of detail
Limited access to information from other companies
Not clear who is responsible for
sharing information
All countries to provide list of
information they need
BE Group to co-ordinate feedback loop via scorecard
“RADAR Template” will be stored on
Intranet
Countries to update learning
following improvement
cycles
We can use the “RADAR
Template” to share
information
Group by Fundamental
Concept
BET responsible for facilitating & co-
ordinating
©EFQM 2011
Action Owner Due
Update database & add RADAR templates Group BE End of Q1
Circulate request for list of knowledge required Group BE End of Q1
Complete & return list of knowledge requirements Country BE End of Q1
Complete RADAR Template Country BE End of April
Review requirements and establish contact with relevant OC Country BE End of May
©EFQM 2011
Define
Analyse
Improve
Measure
Check
The EFQM assessment identified “sharing of best practices between countries” as an opportunity to improve.
Target: 20 “best practices” implemented by the end of the year.
“Best Practices” identified and recognised through annual CEO Awards.
Submission Documents circulated to all countries. No tracking in place to determine whether BP is
implemented in other countries.
Outside Influence Don’t have standardised processes across borders Within Influence Culturally we are internally focused Within Control Not clear who is responsible for sharing information
Proposed Solution Country BE
Representatives become responsible for sharing “key approaches”
Group BE to establish reporting process.
©EFQM 2011
Define
Analyse
Improve
Measure
Check
The EFQM assessment identified “sharing of best practices between countries” as an opportunity to improve.
Target: 20 “best practices” implemented by the end of the year.
Action Owner Due Complete
Update database & add RADAR templates Group BE End of Q1 Yes
Circulate request for list of knowledge required Group BE End of Q1 Yes
Complete & return list of knowledge requirements Country BE End of Q1 Yes
Complete RADAR Template Country BE End of April Yes
Review requirements and establish contact with relevant OC Country BE End of May Yes
“Best Practices” identified and recognised through annual CEO Awards.
Submission Documents circulated to all countries. No tracking in place to determine whether BP is
implemented in other countries.
Outside Influence Don’t have standardised processes across borders Within Influence Culturally we are internally focused Within Control Not clear who is responsible for sharing information
Proposed Solution Country BE
Representatives become responsible for sharing “key approaches”
Group BE to establish reporting process.
©EFQM 2011
Define
Analyse
Improve
Measure
Check
The EFQM assessment identified “sharing of best practices between countries” as an opportunity to improve.
Target: 20 “best practices” implemented by the end of the year.
Action Owner Due Complete
Update database & add RADAR templates Group BE End of Q1 Yes
Circulate request for list of knowledge required Group BE End of Q1 Yes
Complete & return list of knowledge requirements Country BE End of Q1 Yes
Complete RADAR Template Country BE End of April Yes
Review requirements and establish contact with relevant OC Country BE End of May Yes
“Best Practices” identified and recognised through annual CEO Awards.
Submission Documents circulated to all countries. No tracking in place to determine whether BP is
implemented in other countries.
Outside Influence Don’t have standardised processes across borders Within Influence Culturally we are internally focused Within Control Not clear who is responsible for sharing information
Proposed Solution Country BE
Representatives become responsible for sharing “key approaches”
Group BE to establish reporting process.
Total Shared = 20 Total Implemented = 19
©EFQM 2011