dividing decimals © math as a second language all rights reserved next #8 taking the fear out of...
TRANSCRIPT
DividingDecimalsDividingDecimals
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
next
#8
Taking the Fearout of Math
8.25 ÷ 3.5
So far we have discussed the operations of addition, subtraction andmultiplication of decimal fractions, and
we saw that once we knew where toplace the decimal point in the answers,
these operations were identical totheir counterparts for whole numbers.
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
next
In this presentation, we shall seethat division works the same way. That is, any division problem involving decimals
can be converted into an equivalent problem that uses only whole numbers.
next
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
next
Let’s first start with the simplest case in which we divide one whole number by
another1.
note
1 Notice that every whole number can be represented by a decimal fraction. For example, the whole number 6 can be written as 6.0 which is a decimal
fraction. This is the decimal equivalent of saying that every whole number can be represented by a common fraction. For example, 6 = 6 ÷ 1 = 6/1 .
nextnext
Specifically, let’s start with an example in which the divisor is a factor of the
dividend.
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
next
Based on our adjective/noun theme the fact that 300 ÷ 4 = 75 allows us to draw
conclusions such as…
300 apples ÷ 4 = 75 apples
If we wanted to use the usual division algorithm (“recipe”) to
arrive at this result we might first have written…
3 0 04
7
2 82
0
2 0
5
nextnext
next
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
next Now add the noun “apples”
to both the dividend and the quotient.
To help get to the main point of this
presentation, let’s simply replace the word
“apples” above by the word “hundredths. When
we do this we obtain…
next
apples
apples3 0 04
7
2 82 02 0
5
apples
apples3 0 04
7
2 82 02 0
5 hundredths
hundredths
Recalling that in place value notation75 hundredths = 0.75, and
300 hundredths = 3.00,
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
next
we may rewrite…
next
3 0 0 hundredths4
7 5 hundredths
in the form…3.0 04
.7 5
next
In summary, the above algorithm is simply another way of writing
300 hundredths ÷ 4 = 75 hundredths, or equivalently 3.00 ÷ 4 = 0.75.
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
nextnext
When we use the division algorithm to divide a decimal by a whole number, we
simply place a decimal point in the quotient directly above where it appears
in the dividend and then divide exactly as we would have done if there had been no
decimal point in the problem.
For example, suppose we wanted to divide 3.36 by 4. That is, we wanted to write the quotient 3.36 ÷ 4 as a decimal.
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
nextnext
In “paper and pencil” format, we might use the following sequence of steps…
Step 1
We would rewrite 3.36 ÷ 4 as…
3.3 64
next
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
nextnextStep 2
Then perform the division as if there had not been
any decimal point.
3.3 64
8
3 21
6
1 6
4
We would then place a decimal point in the quotient so that it is aligned with the
decimal point in the dividend…
3.3 64 .
Step 3 .
nextnext
What we really did when we used the above algorithm was the same as if we
had viewed 3.36 as 336 hundredths. In other words, 3.36 ÷ 4 means the same thing as 336 hundredths ÷ 4;
and since 336 ÷ 4 = 84, 336 hundredths ÷ 4 = 84 hundredths.
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
nextnext
Notes
Thus, the previous division could have been
written in the form…apples
apples3 3 64
7 5 hundredths
hundredths
Recall that division is still “unmultplying”. In other words, 3.36 ÷ 4 means the number which when multiplied by 4 yields 3.36 as
the product. Thus, we can check our result by observing that 0.84 × 4 = 3.36
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
nextnext
Notes
The same logic applies even if the dividend is a decimal that is less than 1.
For example, suppose that we want to express the quotient 0.000012 ÷ 6
as a decimal.
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
nextnext
We could avoid the use of decimals completely by observing that 0.000012
represents 12 millionths. Then, we may use the fact that 12 ÷ 6 = 2 to conclude
that 12 millionths ÷ 6 = 2 millionths.
In summary…
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
nextnext
Using decimal notation, the above sequence of steps would look like…
0.000012 ÷ 6
= 0.000002
= (12 ÷ 6) millionths
= 2 millionths
= 12 millionths ÷ 6
0.0 0 0 0 1 26
.00 0 0 0 0 2
1 2
next
Keep in mind that there are other ways to do this problem. In particular, if you prefer
to work with common fractions, simplyrewrite 0.000012 as 12/1,000,000, whereupon the
problem becomes…
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
nextnext
Notes
12/1,000,000 ÷ 6 or
12/1,000,000 × 1/6 or
2/1,000,000
Notice that even though 2/1,000,000 can be reduced to 1/500,000; there is no need to do this if we want to express the answer as
a decimal.
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
nextnext
Notes
In other words, in decimal notation, the “denominators” must be powers of 10.
Let’s now generalize how we divide a decimal by a decimal.
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
nextnext
In the present context, we now know how to divide a decimal fraction by a
whole number.
One of the nice things about mathematics from a purely logical point of view is that it
gives us practice in reducing new problems to equivalent problems which we
were able to solve previously.
next
Let’s suppose we were thenasked the following question.
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
nextnext
Express the quotient 0.000012 ÷ 0.006 as a decimal fraction.
Here’s one approach for solving this problem. We already know how to divide
a decimal by a whole number. We also know that if we multiply both numbers in a division problem by the same (non-zero) number, we obtain an equivalent ratio.
With this in mind we notice that to convert 0.006 into a whole number wemust move the decimal point (at least) 3 places to the right. As we noted in
our previous presentation, shifting the decimal point 3 places to the rightmeans that we have multiplied the
decimal by 1,000. Hence, to keep thequotient the same, we must also multiply the dividend (that is, 0.000012) by 1,000.
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
next
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
nextnext
In summary, then we may move the decimal point 3 places to the right
in both 0.000012 and 0.006 to obtain the equivalent problem 0.012 ÷ 6;
which we already know how to solve.
0.012 ÷ 6 = 12 thousandths ÷ 6 =
2 thousandths = 0.002
Notice that 0.000012 ÷ 0.006 does not look like 0.012 ÷ 6, but the two quotients
express the same ratio.2
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
nextnext
Notes
One way to check this is to do bothcalculations on a calculator and see
that the answers are the same.
note
2 It’s similar to saying that 30 ÷ 10 doesn't look like 6 ÷ 2, but they both name the same rate. For example, at a rate of 6 for $2 you would get 30 for $10.
next
We could also do this problem by rewriting each decimal fraction as an equivalent common fraction. More specifically…
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
nextnext
Notes
0.000012 = 12/1,000,000, and 0.006 = 6/1,000
Hence…
0.000012 ÷ 0.006 = 12/1,000,000 ÷ 6/1,000
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
nextnext
Notes
0.000012 = 12/1,000,000, and 0.006 = 6/1,000
0.000012 ÷ 0.006 = 12/1,000,000 ÷ 6/1,000
= 12/1,000,000 × 1,000/6
= 2/1,000
= 0.002
What we have just shown is the equivalent of the way most of us were taught to do
this problem by a rather rote method. Specifically, given a problem such as…
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
nextnext
Notes
0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 2
We first moved the decimal point just enough places to convert the divisor into a whole number (in this example it is 3 places
to the right) to obtain…
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
nextnext
Notes
0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 2
We then had to move the decimal point the same number of places in the divisor
to obtain…
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
nextnext
Notes
0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 1 2
We were then told to carry out the division in the usual way…
0 0 2
nextnext
Not only was this sheer rote, but it was an eyesore trying to keep track of where the decimal points were originally and
where they were after they were moved. In essence, it was like a “magic trick” with little meaning to most students.
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
next
Notes
However, the magic vanishes and the true understanding occurs when we see
that 0.006 0.000012 is just another way of writing 0.000012 ÷ 0.006 and that moving the
decimal point 3 places to the right in both the divisor and the dividend was simply
another way of saying that we were multiplying both numbers by 1,000, thus
maintaining the same ratio.
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
next
Notes
Moreover, if we were willing to work with greater numbers and wanted to
wait until the very end before we had to deal with decimals, nothing prevents us
from moving the decimal points in a way that converts both decimals into
whole numbers.
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
next
Notes
To help make sure that you are becoming more comfortable with thisnotion of relative size let’s see what
happens when we compute thequotient 0.02 ÷ 0.0004.
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
next
To convert 0.0004 to a whole number, we have to move the decimal point
4 places to the right. This means we are multiplying 0.0004 by 10,000.
next
And if we multiply 0.0004 by 10,000 we also have to multiply 0.02 by 10,000 in order not to change the ratio. In other
words, we move the decimal point 4 places in both 0.0004 and 0.02 to obtain the equivalent ratio 200 ÷ 4, which is 50.
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
next
As a check we notice that…
50 × 0.0004 = 0.02
next
What the answer means is that as small as 0.02 is it is still 50 times
as great as 0.0004.
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
next
Notes
We could move the decimal point even more places to the right but it wouldn’t
affect the answer. For example, if we move the decimal point 6 places to the right in
both numbers the ratio would be20,000 ÷ 400, or still 50.
next
If we wanted to use the fraction format for division, we could have rewritten the
problem as 0.02/0.0004 after which we could multiply numerator and denominator by
10,000 to obtain…
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
next
Notesnext
0.02 × 10,000
0.0004 × 10,000=
2004
= 50
Up until now, our trip through the world of decimal fractions may not have
seemed overly exciting.
© Math As A Second Language All Rights Reserved
nextnext
When all is said and done, it seems that except for learning where to put the
decimal point and how many places to move it, we do decimal arithmetic the same way that we do whole number arithmetic.