district board of trusteesscf.edu/content/pdf/board/boardpacket082912.pdf · the district board of...

District Board of Trustees

AGENDA

The District Board of Trustees - State College of Florida,

Manatee - Sarasota

Regular Meeting, August 29, 2012

SCF Lakewood Ranch

1. Call to Order and Pledge of Allegiance – Chairman Beruff

2. Announcements and Recognitions - President Hafner

3. Organizational Meeting as required by 1001.61(4) Florida Statutes, for the purpose of electing a Chair and Vice Chair of the District Board of Trustees through June 30, 2013 – President Hafner

4. Exhibit A: Approval of SCF Board of Trustees Calendar for 2012 – 2013 – Page 1

5. Approval of Non-Financial Consent Agenda Items (“Consent Agenda A”) Exhibit B: Minutes of May 21, 2012 Special Meeting –

Exhibit C: Minutes of June 19, 2012 Special Meeting – Page 13

Exhibit D: Minutes of June 26, 2012 Regular Meeting – Page 35

Exhibit E: Amended Schedule of Non Credit Courses CCD Summer 2012 (201235) – Page 43

Exhibit F: Schedule of Non Credit Courses CCD Fall 2012 (201315) – Page 44

Exhibit G: Human Resources Office Personnel Actions – Page 56

Exhibit H: SCFCS Monthly Report – Page 59

Exhibit I: Traffic Safety Institute Meeting Minutes June 20, 2012 – Page 63

Exhibit J: Memorandum of Understanding Bayshore Elementary School Tutoring Program – Page 66

Exhibit K:

Approval of Acceleration and Enrichment Programs – Articulation Agreements 2012-2013 – Page 71 (packet includes a sample of private and public school agreements – all originals available at BOT meeting) a) Allendale Academy b) Bradenton Christian School c) Brickhouse Academy d) Cardinal Mooney e) Edison Academic f) Emerson Preparatory School g) Family Life Community School h) Florida Unschoolers i) Generation Harvest j) Gulf Coast Christian k) Hillcrest Academy l) Hope Presbyterian School m) Horizon Educational Systems n) Iamhomeschooling.com o) IMG Pendleton p) Learning Prep Academy

of 2

q) Lemon Bay High School r) Lighthouse Preparatory Christian School s) Manatee County School Board t) New Gate School u) Palm Grove School v) Potter’s Wheel Academy w) Prew Academy x) Providence Community School y) Queen of Angels Academy z) Risen Son Academy aa) Sarasota Christian School bb) Sarasota County School Board cc) Shepherd’s Hill Christian School dd) Sonhaven Preparatory School ee) State College of Florida Collegiate School ff) The Achievement Center gg) Venice Christian School hh) West Coast School ii) West Florida Christian

6. Approval of Financial Consent Agenda Items (“Consent Agenda B”)

Exhibit L: Monthly Financial Report – June-July 2012 – Page 169

Exhibit M: Budget Amendments FY 2011/2012 June #47-50 and FY 2012/2013 July #1-5 SCFCS Included) – Page 177

Exhibit N: SCFCS Financial Statements July 2012 – Page 186

Exhibit O: Property Disposals – Page 196

Exhibit P: Gifts and Grants – Page 198

Exhibit Q: List of Presidential Memos for Change Orders and Guaranteed Maximum Price Contracts under $325,000 – Page 200

7. Completion of Evaluation of President - Chairman

8. Exhibit R: Approval of Recommended Prequalified Construction Contractors – Ms. Steen – Page 201

9. Exhibit S: #12-03 – National Science Foundation Grant - Successful Academic and Employment Pathways in Advanced Technologies (PathTech) with University of South Florida-Tampa – Ms. Lock – Page 202

10. Exhibit T: #12-07 National Science Foundation Grant - Educating Science Teachers in a

liberal arts setting: A partnership between New College of Florida and State College of Florida – Ms. Lock – Page 204

11. Appointment of Audit Liaison Board Member – Dr. Probstfeld

12. State College of Florida Foundation Quarterly Report – Ms. Lowery

13. Board Comments & Adjournment

State College of Florida, Manatee – Sarasota Board of Trustees- Calendar of Events – 2012-2013

Time Event Place

August 29, 2012 4:00 PM SCF BOT Meeting

SCF Lakewood Ranch

Board Room #116/117

September 25, 2012

5:00 PM

SCF BOT Meeting

SCF Bradenton

Board Room #7 – 160

October 30, 2012 5:00 PM SCF BOT Meeting SCF Bradenton


November 27, 2012

5:00 PM SCF BOT Meeting SCF Bradenton


December 14, 2012 5:00 & 7:30 PM

Graduation Commencement Neel Performing Arts Center Bradenton Campus

December 19 - Jan. 1,

2012/2013

Holiday Break – College Closed

January 29, 2013 5:00 PM SCF BOT Meeting SCF Bradenton Board Room #7 – 160

February 26, 2013 5:00 PM SCF BOT Meeting SCF Bradenton Board Room #7 – 160

March 11 - 17, 2013 Spring Break – College Closed

March 26, 2013 5:00 PM SCF BOT Meeting SCF Bradenton


April 30, 2013 5:00 PM SCF BOT Meeting SCF Venice

PDC Selby Room

May 4, 2013 10:30 AM 1:00 PM

Graduation Commencement SCF Neel Performing Arts Center

May 28, 2013

5:00 PM SCF BOT Meeting SCF Lakewood Ranch

Board Room #116/117

June 25, 2013 5:00 PM SCF BOT Meeting

SCF Bradenton


July 30, 2013

5:00 PM SCF BOT Meeting SCF Bradenton

Board Room #7 - 160

Note: On designated Tuesdays - workshops will be held prior to the regular meeting.

1

hugginn

Typewritten Text

EXHIBIT A

MINUTES THE DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES -- STATE COLLEGE OF FLORIDA

MANATEE – SARASOTA SPECIAL MEETING

Date: May 21, 2012 5:00 p.m. Location: Bradenton Campus Proceedings: 1. The District Board of Trustees of State College of Florida, Manatee – Sarasota held a

special meeting on May 21, 2012 at SCF Bradenton. Board Members Present: Carlos Beruff, Lori Moran, Ann Moore, Charlene Neal, Jennifer Saslaw and Dr. Craig Trigueiro. Administrators Present: President Lars A. Hafner, Vice Presidents, Jack Crocker, Mike Mears and Carol Probstfeld and General Counsel, Steve Prouty. Meeting was called to order and the Chairman led the Pledge of Allegiance. Chairman Beruff stated this Special Meeting was called to discuss the upcoming budget.

2. Budget Meeting Dr. Probstfeld stated she has a brief presentation that hits the key concepts of the budget and then she will turn it over to the board for questions. First, she showed a chart showing the tuition at the lower level. As indicated in the information supplied to the board that is staying flat for next year. She also showed the state university system tuition. She stated that once again SCF is a better deal, every year, compared to the university system for the first two years of a college education. Next, she pointed out the baccalaureate tuition. She stated the way the law is written for the baccalaureate tuition is that they do not have flexibility about what they are going to charge. They have to charge what is in the statute and the statute says that they will charge $91.79 per load hour. However, in order to keep the bottom line, the same for students from current year to next year, they reduced some fees. She stated they reduced the student activity fee and the capital improvement fee went down in order to keep that bottom line cost to the student the same. She showed the out of state tuition making the same changes to keep the bottom line the same. Chairman Beruff confirmed that by law they have to raise the price per tuition hour but she has proposed that the other fees that they do control are lowered so that they offset what is required by law and end up at the same place. Dr. Probstfeld confirmed. She stated that is only for baccalaureate tuition. She stated the lower division gives a number and then gives them a range around that number where they can keep the tuition. Dr. Probstfeld also demonstrated the total funding. She showed a chart which showed both what is received from the state per FTE and what is received in tuition per FTE. She stated the key to this is the trend lines showing the trend of enrollment going up over time and the funding staying fairly flat. She pointed out in 2006 the college received approximately $5,000 per FTE. In 2012-13, 7 years later, they are going to receive approximately $5,000

2

hugginn

Typewritten Text

EXHIBIT B

Proceedings, May 21, 2012 |2

per FTE. She stated during that period of time, enrollment went up 20.4%, but they are still providing service to those students for the same dollar amount that they were doing in 2006-07. She pointed out when enrollment was at 9,565 and they were getting $4,000 per student is when they lost the edge on customer service particularly as it related to financial aid. She stated a portion of the decline in enrollment is directly attributable to that. Chairman Beruff asked of the enrollment growth and how much of that is relative to the online education. Dr. Probstfeld stated she updated the chart for the 2011-12 year and it shows enrollment has tapered off over the last couple of years but the online portion has grown significantly. She stated that is why they are presenting the board with the budget that they are with so much emphasis on e- learning initiatives. She stated that is what the students want and to the extent that they do not receive it at SCF, they will get it somewhere else. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked if that would put less pressure on the library. Dr. Probstfeld stated it might put more pressure on the library. Since they are looking to do more things in an electronic format they have more students who are looking to the library to provide electronic resources. She stated that is part of the e-textbook initiative that they want to talk about where the librarians will basically be repurposing from the librarian that you know to an e-librarian or an instructional design librarian working hand in hand with faculty to help them put their resources in a digital format that students can access. She highlighted some of the things the college wants to do relative to the change in what the enrollment is all about. She stated there are three things that are directly related in this reinvestment budget. She stated there is change to more of a distance learning concept. One is the LMS which they have already talked about, which they have had to budget for next year, remembering that they are buying a new LMS but they will be overlapping for a period of time with the old LMS as they pilot and transition so they had to account for that expense in next year’s budget. She went on to explain they have an investment in e-learning. She stated e-learning is happening randomly across campus without coordination so they would like to put someone responsible for that coordination of e-learning activity. She stated not only the technical aspects of it, or working with the faculty, but also the advertising and the outreach to the students. She stated right now it is being done in a variety of ways across campus but it is not organized and coordinated in one place. In addition to that, they want to enhance the website. She stated right now they outsource and spend money any time they want to make significant changes to the website and that is happening more and more frequently. Part of the reinvestment is to bring that expertise in house so they can keep up with that change and save a lot of money to upgrade the web regularly. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked if it is in the budget. Dr. Probstfeld stated it is in the budget that was proposed to the board. Dr. Probstfeld stated two other things that are related to enrollment in general are that they would like to expand the STEM initiatives. She stated STEM is a fairly costly program so they have to invest in equipment largely. She stated they have taken Perkins money and Foundation money and a good portion of the money in the budget that is related to capital improvements and putting that toward the equipment they are going to need to beef up the STEM programs. Lastly, she stated the college has a student engagement initiative that they have many people working on, strictly focused on enrollment, but a big portion of that is called Degree Works. She stated that is a software package that will allow students to monitor their progress towards graduation, independently and electronically so they can improve the graduation rates making sure students are staying on track. Ms. Moran asked if that was a supplement to the coding system that was dropped a while back. Mr. Russell stated it is not related but it can certainly be a part of that. Dr. Probstfeld’s last slide showed the e-textbook initiative. It showed for a basic first year student, the books would add up to about $582.00 for a term. She stated if they can eliminate one book from that student’s term they will have reduced the student’s total cost of attendance by 5.5%. She stated if they have a student that is taking one class

3


and they can eliminate that book they have reduced that student’s cost of attendance by about 28%. She stated books are the killer and they are low priced books as beginning freshman. She stated when the student gets into Health Sciences that number can double easily. She stated they are asking the board for $100,000.00 to invest in that and what that will pay for would be things like more electronic resources in the library so students can download to an e-reader those books in electronic format at very little cost compared to the $200 for a textbook in the nursing program. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked if they were available in electronic format already. Dr. Probstfeld stated many titles are but not everything. She stated they are starting with a pilot and the library has been working very hard. She stated they have expanded some this year but with this additional infusion of money they will be able to expand even more. She stated they can buy a campus license so anyone who is a student or faculty member can access those books in an electronic format. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked what the percentage basis would be compared to the hard textbooks. Dr. Probstfeld referred to Ms. Elliott for an answer. Ms. Elliott stated it is all over the place. She stated they could end up paying more for one title because it is in electronic format or they could pay a lot less. For example, they have been able to work with an instructor in nursing and she was able to find an equivalent text, out of an ebook collection, that cost $5,000 for the entire collection, which has about 5,000 titles. So basically it cost $1 for the book. Each student is now saving $109.00 because they do not have to purchase the textbook. She stated another example in another nursing class they paid about $200 but it will only be one user at a time. That is a textbook that an instructor selected and was able to find exactly that book in e-format, however it can only have one user at a time. It was stated that can still work because some of those classes have small enrollment and as long as the students understand that one student at a time can go in and use it they will be okay. She stated they will receive turn away statistics so they can decide if they need to purchase a second copy, etc. Chairman Beruff confirmed that the electronic version for one book is $200. He asked what the print version would be. It was stated it was approximately the same. He asked if it was possible to get two students to share the cost of one electronic version. Dr. Probstfeld continued and asked the board to allow the college to use about $875,000 of the excess revenue over expense that will be generated this year to jump-start the e-learning initiatives for next year. She stated to expand the STEM opportunities, which is largely equipment, that would require about $700,000, most of which is being paid for by the Perkins Grant, money from the Foundation and money in the regular budget. She stated she was asking for approval to use this year’s excess revenue for new initiatives which include the strategic enrollment initiative with the Degree Works software where students can track their progress, which is approximately $140,000. Also, the e-learning initiatives with coordination, course development and instructional design which is approximately $260,000. The new learning management system is in the vicinity of $275,000-300,000. The pilot for the e-textbook initiative is approximately $100,000 and the enhanced web capabilities are approximately $80,000. She again stated the excess revenue from this year would fund the budget next year. She asked the board for any questions. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked about the $140,000. Dr. Probstfeld stated it is for Degree Works software and asked Ms. Drees to elaborate. Ms. Drees stated the college currently uses the degree audit system call CAP. She stated it is functional and it works but it is not the latest and greatest. She stated the Degree Works functionality is more complex and more integrated with the student information system and has a lot more functionality for the students with a lot more course planning, schedule planning and it has a much better interface. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked what the student will get from that. Ms. Drees stated it is a planning tool. She stated it will have a list of whatever program the student is in and show

4


checkmarks of the levels they have met towards their goal, and there are options to help the students reach their goal. Ms. Drees stated it is how the students learn how to plan their degree. Ms. Moran asked if it was a virtual guidance counselor and if it eliminated the face to face contact. Ms. Drees stated the student can login and assess where they are in their goal and tools to help them get to where they want to be. She stated it supplements the advising they receive so they can self-manage and engage in the process. Chairman Beruff asked the deficiencies in the system the college currently uses. Ms. Drees stated the Degree Works software has improved interface, improved data integration and more functionality. She stated in the current software, students cannot course plan. The software would not say a certain course would be available on a certain campus at a certain time. With the new software it can integrate with other systems and help the students plan. Ms. Saslaw asked if a student only attends classes in the evenings, what access would they have to a counselor, versus access to this system at any time. Ms. Drees stated the counselors are open normal operating hours by appointment or phone consultation or email consultation but the students would be able to access their degree audit at any time. Ms. Saslaw asked if it would be a reasonable guess that they would not need as many live counselors with this system. Ms. Drees stated this software would address some significant gaps. She stated the current staff spends a lot of time helping students plan but they do not have a lot of resources available to help them plan. Dr. Hafner stated this software will give the student a pathway so they know what is required to get to the end game so they do not get caught up in having to come back and are not able to get financial aid which results in not completing their degree. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked for a real synopsis of what they expect to get out of the $800,000 and the costs as well as the other alternatives. Chairman Beruff asked if the budget is sustainable. He stated the previous year the answer to that question was no because certain expenditures were being postponed. He asked if this year’s budget is sustainable and if it addressed the shortcomings that they had the previous year. Dr. Probstfeld stated they have addressed the shortcomings from last year and if they looked at the line items, the board could see the college is putting more money into equipment, which was one area that was indicated the previous year. She stated there were other things, such as an enterprise software that the college has invested millions dollars. She stated they have super users and every year they try to send them to the conference so they can learn the latest and greatest, she stated they did not do that in the previous year so they need to go next year and that is included in the budget. Chairman Beruff asked about the parameters in which the board will support travel and expenditures. He stated as a board they need to set policies as to what they can expect is tolerable without the board’s consent. Dr. Probstfeld asked the board for any further questions. She did state that the budget does not suggest any changes in salary for any employees across the board this year. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked about the Collegiate School needing another infusion of $135,545. Dr. Probstfeld stated she had an updated amount. Chairman Beruff asked if the college had heard back from the applied for grant for the collegiate school in Venice. Dr. Hafner stated he had not heard at that time. Dr. Probstfeld stated they are headed in the path that was indicated. She stated when the collegiate school has the full complement of the 10th-12th graders they will be where the school is covering its cost. Chairman Beruff asked what it was last year. Dr. Probstfeld stated it was approximately $200,000. She stated 2013-2014 it will start covering its costs. Vice Chairman Trigueiro then brought up travel. He asked about the estimated actual expense. Dr. Probstfeld stated that is what they are estimating at year end so it is a couple of month’s old. She stated they realized a lot of travel takes place in the Spring because that is when faculty goes to conferences, etc. She stated they may have underestimated that. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated all of the

5


travel expenses went up significantly. He asked if that includes conferences. Dr. Hafner stated yes. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated he agrees with the Chairman that at some point they need to look further into the travel expenses. Dr. Probstfeld pointed out that there are 110 different departments submitting budgets. She stated the way they manage the budgets is they give the department the opportunity to move money from one line item to another during the course of the year. She stated they underspent travel this year but they have overspent capital. She stated it goes back to Chairman Beruff’s point where the college did not put a lot of money into equipment last year but people made the decision that maybe they will forego a conference because they need a piece of equipment more imminently. She stated the departments can amend their budget within the course of the year. She stated things move in and out because the 110 different departments are making decisions about where it is most important to spend their money. She stated she agrees they need to look at travel and policies but each department is making their own decision on where they want to spend the money. She stated the last thing she would want to do is get into a position where they are micromanaging the line items because that will force people to spend every last dime they have in that line item. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated the board is not talking about that. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked about Rental/Facilities. He asked why they are projected to go up substantially. Ms. Kester stated they added the disaster recovery site. Dr. Probstfeld stated that includes the disaster recovery, back up site so if we have a complete disaster at the campus and the computer center is destroyed they can continue to run the business from a site in Winter Haven. Chairman Beruff asked if that was only in case of an emergency. Dr. Probstfeld stated it runs constantly. She stated it backs up the entire system, multiple servers. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked if they were talking about computer hardware. Mr. Hou stated the college owns the hardware and rent the disaster recovery space. Chairman Beruff asked if there are other people doing the same thing. He asked if there is a building full of computers and each has a tag that says whose it is. He asked how much the college is paying for that and how big of a space they are talking about. Mr. Hou stated we rent one rack of space. Vice Chairman Trigueiro suggested they see if they can rent space in the Manatee County Emergency Management System. Dr. Probstfeld stated in addition to space it covers the electricity, etc. She stated if we lost power in this area we would lose everything. Chairman Beruff stated the Manatee County Emergency Management system is bullet proof and has its own source of power. He asked if the college is committed to this lease. Dr. Probstfeld stated it is an annual contract. Ms. Saslaw asked if both facilities had 24 hour staff on duty. It was stated they both had 24 hour staff. Dr. Probstfeld stated LambdaRail internet connectivity is included in that fee. Chairman Beruff asked for details on the rental of the Winter Haven facility to compare. Dr. Probstfeld stated LambdaRail would have to be purchased with another facility. Mr. Hou added that the State Auditor General’s office requires disaster recovery to be out of the region or out of the state, if possible. He stated he would check on the Manatee County site to see if it meets the requirements. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked about insurance and if having the college appraised could lower that cost. Dr. Probstfeld stated the Consortium is going to have a special meeting in the near future to discuss these matters. She stated many of the re-insurers in the market have bailed so they will no longer have the 3% deductible. She stated it is going to go up to a 5% deductible and the premiums are going up. She stated they are getting together to try to decide what to do as a system to offset this. She stated the re-insurers are not out there to cover, for example, if Miami-Dade took another Andrew Hurricane, it would take all of the money that is there for the entire system, for them to recover. She stated if anyone else got

6


hit or hurt for the rest of that year it would be tapped out. Mr. Langenback stated that last year the Consortium had $155 million in re-insurance. He stated this year the most they could get is $90 million. Next, Vice Chairman Trigueiro brought up Advertising not required by law and asked if that is Public Affairs and Marketing Budget. Ms. Walker stated most of that amount is her budget but each department is able to have some advertising. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked how much more money Ms. Walker would need to compete with Keiser University. Ms. Walker stated the most effective use of a budget increase would be to do a market survey. She stated the prospective students are mainly in social media and that is a splintered market. She stated they need to invest in research to get where the students are getting their messages and then invest in that. She stated they would need between $30,000-50,000 to do a solid benchmark study. Chairman Beruff asked the percentage of high school students coming directly to SCF. Ms. Walker stated about 50% of the students that continue to college come to SCF. Chairman Beruff stated we need to market to those students. He asked how much of that is going to campuses and arranging field trips in middle school. Ms. Walker stated the college has active outreach and they are in all of the high schools. Ms. Drees stated that historically they have done a lot of outreach in the high schools and into the middle schools but that has dropped a bit. Dr. Hafner stated that a couple of years ago Manatee County bussed in students from some middle schools but because of budget cuts that is no longer feasible. Dr. Matthew Thomas, Assistant Professor, Natural Sciences stated he hosted a tour of King Middle School students the week before. He stated they were brought into the science labs but also toured other parts of the school. Chairman Beruff stated he felt they should be catering to the middle schools. He asked if the current students have been surveyed to see how they found out about SCF. Ms. Walker stated they have but there is not a good solid response rate. She explained it would be helpful to have someone who specializes in market research techniques to do that. Chairman Beruff suggested they try to do that internally first and then if they do not get the answers they need they can use money to advertise. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked to add this as an agenda item for the next meeting to be put up for a vote. Ms. Moran asked if the college has a Facebook page. Ms. Walker stated that they do and they have a lot of “Likes” on the page. Ms. Moran stated she has a middle school and a high school student at home and she gets brochures in the mail from several different universities. Chairman Beruff asked Dr. Probstfeld for details on the Service Contracts on page 20 of the proposed budget. Ms. Moore stated it would be cost effective to invite middle school students to special events on campus such as a film festival or tennis opening. Ms. Wedler-Johnson stated in February the Venice campus targeted the students that might be interested in the STEM initiative. She stated they opened the Venice Campus on a Saturday and they had over 200 students, mostly middle school but some high school as well and they did interactive, exciting experiments to sell STEM careers. She stated they had a career workshop where the students could learn about STEM careers. They went to science labs where the students learned how to make slime. She stated they learned about genetics and made DNA necklaces. She stated they had a wonderful time and was very well received. Ms. Saslaw stated that they received amazing press on that event. Ms. Wedler-Johnson stated that Gulfcoast Community Foundation paid for most of the event.

7


Chairman Beruff asked how much Gulfcoast contributed. Ms. Wedler-Johnson stated it was around $5,000. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked why the travel budget for the collegiate school went up. Dr. Probstfeld stated that is because of board of trustee training. She stated the expectation is to send the board to the training session to be in compliance with the law. Vice Chairman Trigueiro passed out a page of Dr. Hafner’s contract. He stated he crossed out all the verbiage that had to do with the President’s salary being tied to the other 26 schools. Dr. Hafner stated he cannot redo his contract. He can give notice, like he has, that he will not take a pay increase and he will not allow for the contract to roll over so it becomes effectively a four year contract. He stated they cannot change the contract. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked if they do not change the contract, how does that affect the salary being an average of all the colleges. Dr. Hafner stated the board has a right to not allow the salary to go up to the average. Dr. Hafner stated that the way the contract reads is that the salary will stay the same as long as the board wants it to stay the same. Chairman Beruff stated that issue will be discussed again at the following meeting. Vice Chairman Trigueiro suggested the lobbying budget be lowered to the “pre-Hafner” level. Dr. Probstfeld stated they already eliminated the lobbying budget. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked about the amount of vacation offered to senior management and the amount of vacation available to directors. He stated it is his understanding that they operate under a guideline and not a requirement. Dr. Probstfeld stated that is correct. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated he would like to see the number of weeks that the board approves to be reevaluated at the next budget. Dr. Probstfeld stated the board had asked them to get an RFP to get a salary and compensation survey and they will have some information on that at the following meeting. Chairman Beruff asked about the 360 degree evaluation. Dr. Probstfeld stated that will also be addressed at the next meeting. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked if the Chairman wanted to hold in abeyance addressing the amount of weeks of vacation. Chairman Beruff stated they need to approve a budget by law by a certain date. He would like to approve the budget with a caveat that after the survey is completed they will make a change in the budget. Vice Chairman Trigueiro brought up the issue of the augmentation of the collegiate school budget with funds from SCF that were intended to be paid back in the future. He stated that should be considered a long term debt of the collegiate school. He stated he would be making a motion at the next meeting to reclassify the funds from the auxiliary funds of the collegiate school not as an asset but as long term debt. Dr. Probstfeld stated in the footnote of the financials for the collegiate school they are referenced as a debt to pay-back to the college. Ms. Kester stated they do not have anything formalized but it is being tracked. She stated it is being recorded as revenue with the intention that once the collegiate school is self-supporting they would set up a structured pay-back. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated if it is a long-term debt it should not be listed as revenue. Dr. Probstfeld stated they cannot show a negative fund balance in the collegiate school according to the contract signed with the school board. She stated that is why it is footnoted that it will be paid back to the college when the collegiate school starts to generate revenue. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated he is going to make a motion at the next meeting that it be counted as a long-term debt. Dr.

8


Probstfeld stated that would be asking the college to do something that would be in violation of the school district contract. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked what that would be. Dr. Probstfeld stated they are not allowed to carry a negative fund balance. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated that the funds, the revenue of the collegiate school is really a long-term debt but it is listed as revenue. Chairman Beruff stated the college receives the revenue of 95% for each student funded through the school board. He stated Vice Chairman Trigueiro is concerned about, in addition to that revenue, we have to feed the school in order to support it to run. He stated the difference between those two is what is owed from the collegiate school. Ms. Kester stated they have not defined what the repayment structure will be, it is just stated that they will repay it when they can. She stated it may be in the form of a lease. She stated the investment is tracked but they do not know the structure. Chairman Beruff asked if the college charges the collegiate school rent for the facilities. Dr. Probstfeld stated they are not currently charging rent. Chairman Beruff clarified that the college is not only supporting the school but they are providing the facilities. Chairman Beruff stated they should have a full accounting of what the collegiate school costs including the loss of use of the buildings. Dr. Probstfeld stated the college is the fiscal agent for the collegiate school so they keep books in the college’s format. She stated every month they recreate those books in the format required by the school district. She asked if the board is now asking for them to recreate those books for a third time in the format they would like to see. Chairman Beruff stated they need to have a clear picture of what the collegiate school is costing the college. Ms. Neal stated she did not feel they would need the books recreated every month. Dr. Probstfeld clarified that she thought they wanted a balance sheet and revenue and expense statement. Chairman Beruff stated she already has that because she does it every month. He stated all she needs to do is add a little bit of detail to show the collective amount of funds since the inception of the collegiate school is added so Dr. Trigueiro knows when they start to break even and start to get the money back. He stated if they funded $700,000 and have given them three years of free rent and utilities that is essentially what the school has cost the college to run. Ms. Kester stated it is already in the notes. Chairman Beruff clarified that they want it in the notes and not another complicated set of books so they can keep it in their head so when it turns they know the money is coming back. Dr. Probstfeld stated as well as utilities they also have water, custodial and maintenance to guess what those costs might be. Ms. Neal stated her point is that they are not asking them to redo the books every month, they would just like an estimate of the items. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated his whole point was to be transparent and honest. He stated he does not think the public understands the amount of money that SCF is putting into the collegiate school to keep it open and he feels they have a right to know that. He stated the honesty viewpoint comes in because it is a long-term debt and not revenue and you cannot classify something that you know is long-term debt as revenue because they are polar opposites. He stated he understands why they do, but he thinks if they want to be honest about it, otherwise someone is going to accuse them of cooking the books. Dr. Probstfeld stated it has been footnoted every year and asked him to please not say anything about cooking the books because she does not do that and she never will. She stated she does not want that anywhere on the record. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked to let the recording show that it was a mis-statement. He stated that it is a long-term debt and it is not revenue and he thinks it should be listed as a long-term debt and not put it in a footnote and think that makes it better. He stated if the collegiate school has an issue of negative asset then they need to deal with the negative asset. He stated they should ask the board to forgive the debt because they intended to have it paid back but they want them to forgive all the debt paid back in the footnote, or go to the Foundation and ask them for money. He stated they need to clean up the statement so when they say something is something, it really is that. Dr. Probstfeld clarified that if they are going to make the estimate and the statement that they

9


are describing that they still need to do the format that they are doing so that they do not have a negative fund balance that goes to the State Board of Education. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated that if you have, then you did. If in reality those funds are long-term debt and not revenue. Chairman Beruff stated that it is not long-term to the board. He stated he agrees that if he was opening up a business and the parent company sucked so much money out of the parent company that you have to carry it on the books that this company owes this company money. He stated the problem is that the School Board of Manatee County does not let this company have a negative balance sheet. So the board needs to say that they know the money is there but they cannot call it a liability otherwise they violate the contractual obligation. He stated it is not a liability because the college has the money to feed it. They are not creating a deficit in order to make it work. They are taking from the revenue the state is giving them and made a judgment three or four years ago to take an experiment in order to broaden the school base in order to create another opportunity for the students of Manatee County. He stated it was an investment they made and they knew they were going to have to feed it for a few years until it got off the ground. He stated it is going to get off the ground not this year, but the next, to the tune of about $40,000 in the positive. Dr. Probstfeld stated it is their expectation that it will be in the positive next year. Chairman Beruff stated he does not disagree. He stated if he opens a business he can do whatever he wants and do it correctly and he does not have someone telling him he cannot put debt on a business, which is what the School Board says they cannot have. Dr. Probstfeld stated they can have debt, they just cannot have a negative fund balance since they are not generating enough revenue to cover that debt. Dr. Probstfeld stated they cannot have a negative fund balance. If they add debt they will have a negative fund balance at the end of the year. Chairman Beruff asked if they could offset the debt in assets. Dr. Probstfeld asked if they wanted to give them the building. Chairman Beruff asked if they have bought equipment that is worth more than the $130,000. Dr. Probstfeld stated they did not. Chairman Beruff asked how much they spent redoing the space. Dr. Probstfeld stated they spent several million redoing the space. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked if that was a gift. Chairman Beruff stated it was a capital expenditure. He stated it was a gift. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated he was okay with that. Chairman Beruff stated it improved a capital asset that the college has that they should be able to receive lease rent back. Dr. Probstfeld stated that was the ultimate intention. When there is enough revenue being generated to pay back the auxiliary funds to cover the operating funds. Chairman Beruff stated when they first discussed the collegiate school his concern was that they were getting into an arena to compete with the private sector with advantages that the private sector does not have. He stated he thought it was disadvantageous with the way he likes to do things. He stated if they are going to do a charter school it should be free standing economically and they should create it that way. In a balance sheet, they have already spent a couple of million dollars, they are using the space, they have funded another $3-500,000 but the reality is that the collegiate school has cost them a few million dollars. He stated he agrees with Dr. Trigueiro that the board needs to know what the cost of the program has taken out of the college resources. He stated they committed to it, so they are there but before they start making other decisions they need to know the true cost. He stated the college laid out a couple of million dollars to redo the space and they have gotten nothing in return over the last few years. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated they are talking about doing another collegiate school. Dr. Hafner stated the difference with this collegiate school and the second one is that they piloted a model with the first generation to set a new wave of opportunity for Manatee County students and if they were going to do a typical collegiate school like around the state, like the Venice model is being set up as, they would have turned profit immediately. The difference is that they do not have the dual enrollment students in the classrooms of the upper division and they have the sixth and seventh graders that are actual

10


out of pocket. Chairman Beruff stated there is no question that the next one will be different. Nonetheless, he would still like to know what the true cost is and not give away classroom space that was previously used for other students of the college. He stated obviously when the internet enrollment went up by 40% it is a huge number and there is less classroom space used and that is a huge thing. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked if the science department lab fees go to the science department or to the general revenue. Dr. Probstfeld stated that the lab fees are collected and they all held in one place. They are in one account. She stated there are science fees, music fees, math fees and accounting fees to name a few. She stated fees are generated for various courses all around the campus. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked how much money in science lab fees are generated a year. Dr. Probstfeld stated they budget approximately $700,000 for all fees and they review them on an annual basis. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked if every dollar in science department lab fees goes back to the science department. Dr. Probstfeld stated that every fee that is brought to the board for approval is documented support from that department of an actual pass through of costs. She stated the department has to have an invoice of a bill they paid, a class roster of the number of students in those classes that generated those fees and any equipment that is amortized over a certain period of time. She stated if their fee is accurate it should be going back exactly what they are asking for. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated it is not what they are asking for. He stated he is trying to get them more money. Dr. Probstfeld stated whatever fees they collect are fees that they have invoices and class rosters to support. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked if they have a budget and they have so much in lab fees but if their budget is more, do they get any more money. He stated if there is extra money he would like it to go to the science department. He asked if she could put that into a number. Dr. Probstfeld stated there are many departments that have a lot of more educational costs than they are collecting fees for. She stated it would take a lot of time to put those numbers together but there are some departments that are getting more than are generating fees but it is all based on the accuracy of the information that is being provided to collect in terms of lab fees. She stated it should be a direct pass through of expense. If they have accurate information of the pass through expenses then they should receive the revenue. Ms. Saslaw asked if the board is going to be prepared to vote on the budget next week. Chairman Beruff stated he does not believe so. He stated this is a workshop in anticipation of the budget meeting. He stated next week’s meeting can be used to make further changes to the proposed budget for adoption in the June meeting. Ms. Saslaw asked what the budget deadline is. Chairman Beruff stated it is July 1. Dr. Probstfeld stated the deadline is June 30. Dr. Probstfeld stated to Dr. Trigueiro that if the invoices are higher than what they submit for a fee then they are going to get all the costs that they need to run their program whether they generated enough fees or not. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated that he should talk to the science department head and suggest that they overspend their budget so they can their money back. Chairman Beruff asked about the projected proposed budget revenues for 2012-2013 on page 13, Exhibit C-1. Dr. Probstfeld stated she had a new Exhibit for them. Chairman Beruff asked if that number is correct, that the revenue projected is $1,051,500. Dr. Probstfeld stated that is in the unrestricted budget. In the restricted budget, which is largely Foundation money, the total budget is near $1.5 million. She stated there are also the Other funds which include fees, capital improvement fees and student activity fees which are used

11


only for that purpose. Total is $1.62 million. Chairman Beruff then directed the board to Exhibit D-1 of the proposed budget. Dr. Probstfeld stated the bottom line is that they have a positive year end for the baccalaureate and that would represent the last of the Foundation money that has been raised. Chairman Beruff stated the Table of Contents does not match. Dr. Probstfeld stated they should compare page 13 and page 27 of the proposed budget. She stated the Unrestricted area shows they have generated more revenue than expense and in the Restricted area they have generated more revenue than expense and the other funds balance out. She stated they have a positive year-end balance in the baccalaureate program. Chairman Beruff asked how much was funded by the Foundation. Dr. Probstfeld stated a large portion of the annual expenditures were funded by the Foundation. Chairman Beruff asked how long the Foundation is committed to funding. Dr. Probstfeld stated they funded the start-up and they do have some of that money left. Chairman Beruff asked if the Foundation committed to this budget year. Dr. Probstfeld stated they committed a certain amount of money and the college used it as needed. She stated the budget this year will use the remaining money. Chairman Beruff asked if the Foundation does not fund the following year, how big of a hole will the upper school division create for the rest of the college. Dr. Probstfeld stated it will depend on enrollment for next year. Dr. Mears stated enrollment will nearly double this coming year. He stated if enrollment continues to increase, the Foundation can bow out. He stated they have been very supportive. Dr. Probstfeld stated the reality is that the lower division shows less than 50% is covered by state funding and the other, more than 50%, is covered by tuition. She stated ultimately, when the Foundation money dries up, if the state allocation does not go up, tuition will not cover all of the costs. She stated that Dr. Mears has run the operation very conservatively using a lot of adjuncts, etc. She stated the state allocation and tuition are the two major pieces. She stated if the state allocation does not come up and they continue to grow, they will be absent the other piece and ultimately it will not cover its own costs. She stated the lower division does not cover its own costs without the state allocation either. Chairman Beruff stated at some point they need to make sure these programs are self-sufficient before they keep adding more businesses that are bleeding the parent company. Dr. Probstfeld stated thus far, the baccalaureate program has not been subsidized by college auxiliary. She stated it has been budgeted each year but Dr. Mears has managed it so they have not needed to use those sources. Vice Chairman Trigueiro brought up staff members that he does not see functioning to their full capacity. He stated they cannot have executive session due to the Sunshine Law and asked if he should talk to Dr. Hafner privately to bring up those matters. Chairman Beruff clarified that any one board member, individually, could talk to Dr. Hafner. Ms. Saslaw motioned to adjourn, Ms. Moore seconded.

The meeting adjourned at 6:30 pm ______________________________ _____________________________ Carlos M. Beruff, Chair Lars A. Hafner, Secretary Board of Trustees Board of Trustees

12


MANATEE – SARASOTA SPECIAL MEETING

Date: June 19, 2012 5:00 p.m. Location: Bradenton Campus Proceedings: 1. The District Board of Trustees of State College of Florida, Manatee – Sarasota held a

special meeting on Tuesday, June 19, 2012 at SCF Bradenton. Board Members Present: Carlos Beruff, Joseph Miller, Lori Moran, Ann Moore, Charlene Neal, Jennifer Saslaw and Dr. Craig Trigueiro. Administrators Present: President Lars A. Hafner, Vice Presidents, Don Bowman, Jack Crocker, Mike Mears and Carol Probstfeld and General Counsel, Steve Prouty. The meeting was called to order and the Chairman led the Pledge of Allegiance. Chairman Beruff stated as of September he has served on the board for four years. He stated the longer he serves on the board the more he is impressed with the vast majority of the people that work at the college have their heart and their mind in the right place and they come there to do the right thing. He shared his appreciation for them. Next, Chairman Beruff stated he wanted to address publicly that he does not talk to the newspapers for a very simple reason. He stated he believes his colleagues on the board deserve the first knowledge before the newspaper. He stated it would be disrespectful of him to talk to the newspapers about pending matters prior to a meeting. He stated he has made that direct comment to the newspaper reporter. Chairman Beruff stated he was then going to read a prepared statement, which he stated was his evaluation of the President, and does not reflect the opinion of the board. Chairman Beruff recited:

On the occasion of the annual evaluation of President Lars Hafner, there have been a number of troubling things. Even more troubling, the systematic pattern of deliberate behavior that calls into question whether he should continue as President.

Some may claim these troubling things are merely evidence of a "strong leader." And Dr. Hafner has pointed, in his words, to his "creativity" and "entrepreneurship" among the qualities he extols in his record.

But the Board must have a President who is an executive administrator. An administrator who first explains to the Board, fully and ahead of time, and includes all the projected costs, of his proposed projects. And an administrator who gets the Board's approval first, before proceeding to implement even the first stages of those programs first approved by the Board.

13

hugginn

Typewritten Text

EXHIBIT C

Proceedings, June 19, 2012 |2

The Board does not need a "creative entrepreneur," operating on his own, and only gradually providing the Board with bits and pieces of his planned programs.

Many of the things I want to call to the Board's attention are not illegal or criminal activities. But they confirm a pattern of administrative behavior inconsistent with his job description.

This troubling pattern has confronted the current Board, but was also demonstrated in his service to the previous Board make-up too.

Moreover, as we've all witnessed during these months of creating charts for the College operations, expenditures have accelerated considerably with only marginal increases in revenues. Clearly that is not sustainable. It is apparent that the cost to implement these programs has more than exceeded revenues, as we've reviewed numerous times in our meetings.

Number 1 it is apparent that Dr. Hafner proposed an increase in his salary over a two year period of 34% in the worst recession since The Great Depression. I find that difficult to understand. This proposal, in the form of a Third Amendment to his Contract, was only presented to the SCF attorney the morning of the meeting the board met. The attorney had no advanced notice to review the amendment being proposed to his contract. Dr. Hafner's Job Description, in its most fundamental form, describes the President as someone who is the executive officer for the Board, and the chief administrative officer of the College. In the words of his Job Description, he is to put into effect the policies [“underlined”] which have been adopted by the board. Dr. Hafner's troubling managerial style has included several disturbing systematic patterns inconsistent with his Job Description:

One pattern has been to start with only a modest or small program, or to describe a small or modest program to the Board at first. Such initial small programs often entail no funding demands on College budgets, with funding promised from a foundation, other funding sources, and/or private donations. Later, however, the Board only belatedly learns that the program is to be much larger, often requiring College funding; and sometimes the Board is given little choice at those later times other than to approve a much larger program, with much higher costs, than had been first described to them initially.

Examples of this troubling managerial pattern include the development of the Collegiate School, as well as the evolution of the Tennis program.

Another unsatisfactory pattern has been for the President, on his own and before obtaining full Board approval, to undertake and advance larger programs and projects only to find that the Board will not sanction those more ambitious undertakings after all, even when they had been advanced to a considerable extent but without prior Board approval.

An example of this later management style was the ill-fated DEAL.

The supporting materials in your packet here describe in more detail many of the stages of these projects and their gradual evolution, often without sufficient initial information to the full Board for the latter's approval.

The Collegiate School evaluation: This has been a project that started small, with the promise of grant monies. The first budget draft we saw had no negative cash flow for any year. The next budget presented to the Manatee County School District, which was the

14


application, however, had negative cash flows expected to 6 or 7 years. At first it had been a project that could use some available space with only a little renovation. In the latter part of 2009, Dr. Hafner urged the Board to move the project along, even though there was no budget as yet. But by the middle of 2010, the Board was now informed that the project would require substantial funding by the College. To the tune, as you saw at the last meeting, of almost $5 million. The Tennis Program and the “Beyond the Net”: Here was another program that started small. The Board was initially asked to start a Women's Tennis Program, I was in that meeting, with only a few courts, and a modest budget. But a year later the Board now learned that the modest program would be part of a much larger project, in a Capital Improvement Plan for more than $6 million to include a wellness center and other facilities. You have to question whether the mission of this college is to create a wellness center and a fitness facility for $6 million, and put it on the Capital Improvement Project budget even though it was supposed to be funded with foundation dollars or otherwise. But the Board was assured that much of this large project would be funded by private donations and Challenge grants. But as the Foundation and other private funding sources failed to materialize, Dr. Hafner took the total project budget of $766,000 and broke it out into smaller parts, so that he could approve smaller amounts within his authority. But the full Board was never informed earlier of the total project budget that it might need to fund later, without the failed funding sources from other entities.

NOTE: It is recognized that some state and/or federal programs require or encourage schools and other institutions to seek funding in partial increments or in several installments over time. It is also recognized that Dr. Hafner has limited authorization to approve expenditures for many purposes. But those expenditures should be for the overall purposes and the overall project scope first reviewed and approved by the full Board.

The Collegiate School and the evolution of the Tennis Program are only examples of Dr. Hafner's disturbing managerial style, a pattern of failing to first inform the full Board of the scope and likely extent of the whole project, before proceeding to implement the project decisions and policies.

Number 4, The DEAL Experiment is a perfect example of a project that we were not informed of the project until, literally, four days before it was out to the press. Not fully of all the board members. Later when the project was brought over in April, 2011 after discussing the fact that a 10 acre purchase of land for $1.6 million was not prudent in this economy at that location I found out, not through the President or through the college, that there had been an earmark in Tallahassee at the state level for $1.6 million to make that acquisition and that disclosure was never made to me as a board member and I do not believe to any other board member. Then there was the Executive Vehicle episode last summer. Please see supporting material. This purchase was never contemplated in his Third Addendum to his contract, nor included in the budget. Yet he proceeded without Board of Trustees approval with the attempted purchase. Only because it exceeded the purchasing policy criteria did it become public knowledge, when the newspaper brought it to everyone's attention. Mind you we did not have a meeting from May until September and this happened in July. This purchase was attempted while there was no meeting of the BOT from May to September. I found that

15


particularly disturbing in that it was not negotiated in his contract, it was disclosed to the board in advance and I can assure you as an owner of a company that is equal in size to this college as it relates to revenues, if the president of my company went out and bought a $67,000 vehicle without discussing it with me, he would not have a job very long. Hiring Practices. There is a process. You are a public agency and I answer to the taxpayers and the Governor who appointed me. If you have a process for hiring individuals in this college then I think it should be adhered to unless it is an emergency. That process in instances has not been properly followed. Finally, and most disturbing to me is, unfortunately, I was the recipient of some information which came to my attention, but is essentially a forgery of a document that was submitted to Tallahassee. That is an allegation that needs this board’s immediate attention. It is beyond this person, as a board member’s authority to do anything other than bring it to your attention as my fiduciary responsibility which I have now completed and that document is at the end of this packet. As a Trustees of the College, you have the details of the above serious concerns in your packet.

For these reasons, my evaluation and assessment of Dr. Hafner's managerial style and patterns of administrative behavior are not favorable. I do not have confidence in him as a satisfactory person to be the Board's executive officer. Among other things, he has persistently strayed far beyond the constraints of his Job Description.

Chairman Beruff stated that those are his comments and he opened the meeting for comments from the board as they see fit. Ms. Saslaw asked if the board was going to take a break to read the materials so that they can proceed. Chairman Beruff stated it is off his plate. He stated if the board wanted to dismiss the current meeting and regroup on June 26, 2012 to continue the meeting, he was in favor of that. He stated it is the board’s decision to proceed as they choose as, it is off his plate. Ms. Saslaw stated she could not imagine proceeding when they were handed an inch and a half thick notebook of supporting documents just now. She stated she has personal knowledge of the tennis situation if they would like to hear that. Chairman Beruff stated it was up to the board and it is an open meeting. Ms. Saslaw asked if the board was comfortable in proceeding without reading the documents. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated they could all disagree on policy and the tennis courts and if DEAL was a good idea or bad idea. He stated they could always disagree on that. The only really concern of his was item #7. He asked how much of that item was in the packet. Ms. Saslaw stated there are a lot of things that concern her and until she is given some answers, which she assumes might be in the packet, she is certainly not prepared to make any decisions on any of the items or draw any conclusions. Chairman Beruff asked for any other comments. Mr. Miller stated some of the issues that the Chairman brought up were while he sat on the board and that he voted for. He stated he knew about the DEAL program for 8 or 9 weeks and that he had briefings in the President’s office. He stated that ever since the Chairman was appointed he has done nothing but attack the college and attack the staff. He stated he is not sure who is running things, the Chairman or the Governor. Mr. Miller stated the

16


Chairman set up three committees and several meetings to try to nail the President or staff on the way they do things and that he could not find one thing. Mr. Miller stated he knew about the tennis program, he voted for the tennis program, and there is nothing wrong with the tennis program. He stated there is nothing wrong with the DEAL program except that the Chairman did not like it. He stated the Chairman did not like the library, so he killed the library and he killed the DEAL program. Mr. Miller stated the President has been an excellent leader and has done marvelous things for the college. Ms. Saslaw stated that several weeks ago, Steve Harner wrote a letter to the Sarasota Herald paper and confirmed that all the trustees should have gotten that from Ms. Walker, Director of Marketing. Ms. Saslaw stated that she called Mr. Harner the following week and thanked him for all of his service and she appreciated it as a trustee who has been on the board for 13 years. She stated that Mr. Harner told her about the Chairman visiting him and accusing or showing him that the Chairman thought Dr. Hafner had forged Mr. Harner’s signature and that he told her that there have been two times, he thought he recalled, one of which was for the collegiate school, that Dr. Hafner called and asked his permission to sign the document because Mr. Harner could not get to the college in the necessary time frame. Ms. Saslaw stated she does not commend waiting to the last minute to get something done. She stated Mr. Harner further said that if anything was ever signed that he had not given express permission for that he would be the first person to say so. Ms. Saslaw stated that regarding item #7, which the Chairman is saying is the most important, it might be wise to have a further conversation with Mr. Harner. Chairman Beruff stated he would be happy to have that conversation. He asked Ms. Saslaw if her comment was that Dr. Hafner had permission to sign the document. She stated that Mr. Harner was explicit. Dr. Hafner asked if he could speak. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked if they were going to go ahead into the forgery issue. Dr. Hafner thanked everyone for coming to the meeting. He stated that it has been nine months of a witch hunt of the Chairman bullying him and the college. He stated the Chairman has been doing this in private so that the other board members were not aware of what he was saying and what he was doing. Dr. Hafner stated that the bottom line is that the Chairman called him to his office and the first thing he said was, “Do you like your job?” Dr. Hafner stated this was four or five months ago. Dr. Hafner stated that he loves his job. Dr. Hafner stated that the Chairman told him that he “wants him to resign today.” Dr. Hafner asked the Chairman why. Dr. Hafner stated that the Chairman said that if he does not go quietly, that he is going to ruin him and ruin his reputation. Dr. Hafner stated he left there saying he does not know why. He stated the Chairman told him that he had a document that he believes Dr. Hafner forged and that he is going to send it to the State, Inspector General and others in the Attorney General’s Office and that if he does not resign he is going to make it public. Dr. Hafner stated that he said to the Chairman that it is not within his moral compass, he does not do those types of things and that he plays by the rules, as has been indicated through previous evaluations and 26 years of quality public service to the State, to St. Petersburg College, and to the State College of Florida. In this process, the Chairman decided to take the document, at his expense, or someone else’s expense to a forensic person. He stated this was after the Chairman went down to see Mr. Harner and asked him if it was his signature. Mr. Harner stated what Ms. Saslaw stated. Dr. Hafner said that apparently the Chairman was not satisfied enough, so he employed attorney Greg Porges, the former board attorney to go back to visit Mr. Harner and take the same document and show him that document and ask him it if was his signature. Dr. Hafner stated that Mr. Harner told Mr. Porges the exact same thing. He stated the Chairman was not satisfied, even though Mr. Harner said it is a document that he asked and required the

17


President to sign on his behalf. He stated the Chairman then took the document to a forensics person to get to that conclusion that would indicate that someone signed it, other than Steve Harner, which was already stated. Dr. Hafner addressed the Chairman and the board members and stated that he has in his possession a signed affidavit from Steven Harner that says other things regarding this and that he, Mr. Harner, as Chair at the time had given Dr. Hafner his authorization, understanding and agreement and instruction and direction to sign the charter school document. He offered copies to anyone in the audience. He stated there is no forgery, the Chairman was told that but chose to go ahead and take it to a forensics person, the Chairman chose to get Greg Porges involved, which could be a conflict of interest having been former attorney of the board. He stated the Chairman did not then return it to Mr. Porges, but he chose to have it sent to another attorney that just so happens to be a former partner of Mr. Porges. Dr. Hafner stated in trying to do what the Chairman has laid out tonight and again, brought up the ten second telephone conversation they had the past Friday where the Chairman set this special meeting in motion. Dr. Hafner stated the conversation went as follows: Chairman Beruff: “Hi Lars” Dr. Hafner: “Hi Carlos” Chairman Beruff: “I tried to ease you out easily and for the college sake and for your sake but now I do not care about the college and I am going to destroy you. Have a nice weekend, goodbye.” Dr. Hafner stated his daughter heard the conversation. He stated it was ten seconds and that is what has been happening at this institution. He stated this institution is rallying together and pulling together to say they are bigger than one man, being the Chair of the Board. Dr. Hafner stated the bottom line is, when the Chairman talked about the 34% increase in salary, he then asked the Chairman if he realizes that he seconded that motion. Dr. Hafner stated that the Chairman was there, and he seconded the motion, and he would be glad to provide the Chairman with the minutes. Dr. Hafner thanked the Chairman for that increase. Chairman Beruff stated he was not at that meeting. Chairman Beruff stated he was not at the meeting of April, 2011 because he left right after the DEAL. Dr. Hafner stated that was not the salary increase meeting. He stated the salary increase meeting was two years ago. Chairman Beruff placed his hand on Dr. Hafner’s shoulder and interjected and said “are you finished?” Dr. Hafner stated he was not finished and told the Chairman “Please do not touch me.” Dr. Hafner stated he could go back to the board minutes of the meeting on June 23, 2010 which included the Evaluation and bring the President’s salary to the average of state colleges, Carlos Beruff seconded the motion and it was approved unanimously by the board. Chairman Beruff stated that was 2010 and he was referring to 2011. Dr. Hafner stated that the Chairman brought up the salary increase and detailed the 34% increase in his current evaluation. Dr. Hafner stated the Chairman had knowledge and he seconded that motion. Dr. Hafner stated he would go point by point, if the board wishes. Chairman Beruff stated if the President is going to elaborate the events, as he sees them, then he would like the audience to learn the events from his side. The audience asked the Chairman to allow the President to finish. Ms. Moran asked for a copy of the document and asked if it was normal to have all the background noise.

18


Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated that this is all very upsetting. He stated it does not serve the purpose of them being there, and he understands there may be some personal feelings involved but it does not help the process to act as if they are in a hallway somewhere. He stated both Dr. Hafner and Chairman Beruff have strong opinions and strong personalities but they should be courteous until they finish and not interrupt each other and ratchet it down if you can. Chairman Beruff stated he had to stop because the President is giving his rendition of the meetings and he felt he should give his side because that is not what occurred. He stated the President came to his office to review the Agenda in March. The Chairman stated he told Dr. Hafner that he did not think he could work with him. He stated he had an issue with a document that had been forged. He stated when the document first came to his attention, he was not looking for the document. He stated the document came to him. When it came to the document, he needed to get a copy from Tallahassee because he thought that was the proper thing to do. He stated in January he met with Mr. Harner, and had a cup of coffee with him, and all he asked was if it was his signature because he was told by someone that it was not. He stated he did not go looking for this. Someone gave it to him. He wanted to be clear that it is not a witch hunt. He stated it is his fiduciary responsibility if someone hands him a document and tells him it is fraudulent and he is supposed to do something with it. He stated, after that, he went to see Mr. Porges because he served as the college’s attorney for forty years and he did not know what to do next. He asked for Mr. Porges advice. When Dr. Hafner came to his office, he showed it to him and said it would be nice if he left because he did not think it would be good. He stated Dr. Hafner said that he never signed a document and never forged a document in his career. Chairman Beruff stated there was no “ruin your life” nonsense. He assured that that is not his temperament. Dr. Hafner stated the Chair gave him excuses he could hide behind to resign. Chairman Beruff stated he told him to resign because he could not work with him. After that, Chairman Beruff went back to Mr. Porges who recommended a forensic person who took the information and examined the documents and came back and said that, indeed, the individual whose signatures who were handed to him in September/October that showed where the signature was being practiced, was the same individual who signed the document that was sent to Tallahassee for the Collegiate School Application. The Chairman stated he was confused by the affidavit from Mr. Harner because at that time he went back to Mr. Porges looking for his direction, and at that point he advised him to bring it to the attention of the public and that otherwise he would be in breach of his fiduciary responsibility in causing a cover-up. The Chairman wanted to be clear on how it came to this point. He stated he then had a meeting with Dr. Hafner and Mr. Prouty and presented the evidence. He stated he would give Dr. Hafner some time to think about it and seek counsel. He asked Mr. Prouty for confirmation. Mr. Prouty agreed. Chairman Beruff stated he called Dr. Hafner after giving him four days to think about it and left a message. He stated he called again and left a message. He called again and spoke with Dr. Hafner’s assistant and left a message again. He stated he did not hear back from Dr. Hafner, and the time was ticking because of notice times of meetings required under the Sunshine law. He stated he was running out of time. Dr. Hafner finally returned his call and they talked briefly. He stated Dr. Hafner did not seem concerned that there was anything wrong. He stated to Dr. Hafner that it was obvious that he did not think there is a problem. Chairman Beruff stated he proceeded to issue notice for the special meeting so he could meet the statutory requirements to notice the meeting. Chairman Beruff stated he did not know what Mr. Harner is saying to whom because

19


obviously an affidavit is a very strong document. He stated it is a document under oath. He stated when this happened because of the position he sits in, he asked Mr. Porges to contact Mr. Harner independently. Mr. Porges met with Mr. Harner independently, face to face. Mr. Porges subsequently had a phone conversation with Mr. Harner. Chairman Beruff then read an affidavit signed by Mr. Porges who was the attorney for the college for 40 years. Chairman Beruff stated he wanted to get out of it, and asked Mr. Porges to talk to these people independently to hear it directly from the horse’s mouth. He stated he was not happy in the position he was in. Chairman Beruff read Mr. Porges’ affidavit as follows:

Before me, the undersigned authority, personally appeared the Affiant, Gregory J. Porges, who being by me duly sworn, did depose and say, under oath, as follows: Your Affiant is admitted to practice law in the State of Florida, is presently a member in good standing of the Florida Bar and has been issued Florida Bar No. 0120348. Your Affiant is currently active in the practice of law in the State of Florida as a principal and shareholder of the firm of Porges, Hamlin, Knowles & Hawk, P.A., Attorneys at Law, maintaining offices at 1205 Manatee Avenue West, Bradenton, Florida 34205. During February, 2012, your Affiant was retained by Carlos Beruff ("Mr. Beruff"), individually and at Mr. Beruff's personal expense, to provide assistance and advice to Mr. Beruff with regard to a certain matter relating to the official conduct of Lars A. Hafner, Ph.D. ("Dr. Hafner"), in his position as President of the State College of Florida ("SCF") which was uncovered by Mr. Beruff while serving as the current Chairman of the District Board of Trustees of SCF. Your Affiant was advised by Mr. Beruff that his concerns related to certain documents identified as ‘Florida Public Charter School Grant Program Administrative Fees Agreement’ and ‘Florida Department of Education Project Application,’ dated January 28, 2010, both relating to the establishment of the State College of Florida Collegiate School, (‘Collegiate School Documents’) copies of which are attached hereto. The Collegiate School Documents were required to be executed by Stephen Harner ("Mr. Harner"), the then duly acting Chairman of the District Board of Trustees of SCF. Mr. Beruff had received information that such documents were not executed by Mr. Harner but were signed by Dr. Hafner, using a likeness of Mr. Harner’s signature, without Mr. Harner’s knowledge or permission. During May, 2012, Mr. Beruff requested your Affiant to meet with Mr. Harner to inquire of Mr. Harner as to whether he had personally executed the Collegiate School Documents; or, if not, whether Mr. Harner had authorized Dr. Hafner to execute such documents on his behalf; or, whether Mr. Harner had ever granted general permission to Dr. Hafner, with regard to documents required to

20


be executed by the Chairman, for Dr. Hafner to sign Mr. Harner’s name, as Chairman, on Mr. Harner's behalf. On Monday, May 21, 2012, your Affiant [Greg Porges] met with Mr. Harner in the offices of Mr. Harner's place of business, the Crow's Nest Restaurant, located in Venice, Florida and posed the following questions to Mr. Harner:

A. While serving as the Chairman of the District Board of Trustees of SCF did you execute the Collegiate School Documents; and

B. If you did not sign the Collegiate School Documents, did you authorize Dr. Hafner, to sign such documents on your behalf, using your name and title, as Chairman? Mr. Harner responded negatively to both of these questions stating that he did not sign such documents and that he had not authorized Dr. Hafner to sign his name to such documents. [Chairman Beruff: “I did not make this stuff up, I was not the guy who wrote this.”] Mr. Harner acknowledged that, to the best of his recollection, on only one or two occasions during his tenure as Chairman while Dr. Hafner was President, did Dr. Hafner request his permission to sign documents on Mr. Harner's behalf and that such documents were of a minor nature and definitely were not the Collegiate School Documents. On June 11, 2012, your Affiant once again contacted Mr. Harner by telephone to confirm the information provided by Mr. Harner during your Affiant's meeting with Mr. Harner on May 21, 2012, as set forth in Paragraph 6. above, and to further inquire as to whether Mr. Harner had ever granted blanket authority to Dr. Hafner to sign Mr. Harner's name, as Chairman, to documents which required the signature of the Chairman of the District Board of Trustees. During such telephone conversation, Mr. Harner confirmed that he did not execute the Collegiate School Documents; did not authorize Dr. Hafner to sign Mr. Harner's name to the Collegiate School Documents on his behalf; and stated further that he had never granted Dr. Hafner with a blanket authorization to sign his name, as Chairman of the District Board of Trustees, to documents that required the Chairman's signature. This Affidavit has been made by the Affiant for the purpose of describing the activities of your Affiant to assist Mr. Beruff in connection with inquiries undertaken by Mr. Beruff regarding Dr. Hafner in the performance of his duties as President of SCF, as specifically related to the execution of the Collegiate School Documents previously described herein and attached hereto.

Chairman Beruff stated that is signed Gregory J. Porges, Affiant and his signature is notarized. Dr. Hafner stated he would like to read Mr. Harner’s affidavit because that comes straight from the source.

21


Dr. Hafner recited: Affidavit of Stephen Harner, State of Florida County of Sarasota Before me, the undersigned authority, personally appeared Stephen L. Harner, who after first being duly sworn, deposes and says:

1. I am over the age of 18, have personal knowledge of the facts contained in this affidavit, and am competent to testify to them.

2. I once served as the Chairman of the Board of Trustees of what is now known as the State College of Florida, Manatee-Sarasota ("the College"). By virtue of my position as Chairman of the College Board of Trustees, I also served as Charter Head of the State College of Florida Collegiate School (“the School").

3. On at least two occasions I authorized Lars Hafner to sign my signature since I was not available to do so myself.

4. While I served as Chairman of the College and Charter Head of the School, the college applied for a Florida Public Charter School Grant for the School ("the Grant" - Exhibit A). I believe this was one of the occasions when I was unavailable and I authorized, instructed, and directed Lars Hafner, the President of the College, to place my written signature on the Grant Application for me where it was required.

5. I am familiar with the suggestion being made by certain members of the current Board of Trustees of the College that Lars Hafner ‘forged’ my signature in Exhibit A. In all four instances that my signature appears in Exhibit A, I believe Lars Hafner placed it there with my authorization, understanding, and agreement, and at my instruction and direction.

6. Several months ago, the Current Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the College, Carlos Beruff, asked me about these signatures. I explained to him how these signatures came to be in Exhibit A just as I have explained it in this affidavit.

7. Several weeks ago, attorney Gregory Porges asked me about these signatures. I explained to him how these signatures came to be in Exhibit A just as I have explained it in this affidavit.

Signed Stephen Harner, State of Florida, notarized June 18. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated he has not read Mr. Porges affidavit but he does have Mr. Harner’s affidavit from Dr. Hafner. He drew attention to item 4 which states “I believe this was one of the occasions when I was unavailable and I authorized, instructed, and directed Lars Hafner, the President of the College, to place my written signature on the Grant Application for me where it was required.” Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated that Mr. Harner does not state that he gave him permission to do that. He stated he wants everyone to understand what words mean in a court of law. He stated that Mr. Harner states “I believe” he does not say I gave him permission, he is saying “I believe” I gave him permission. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated that “believe” is not a certain word that says I gave him

22


permission, it states “I believe I gave him permission.” Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated that he is a detail person and he picks at words. He stated the fact that it says “I believe” makes him wonder whether Mr. Harner recollects whether he absolutely did say that he gave Dr. Hafner permission to sign the document. He stated if it were that way then they have to figure out why Mr. Porges states in an affidavit that gives exactly the opposite statement. Vice Chairman Trigueiro directed everyone to item 5 which stated “I believe Lars Hafner placed it there with my authorization…” Again, Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated they are dealing with words and again he said “I believe.” He did not say he gave his authorization he stated he “believes” he gave his authorization and to him that means Mr. Harner is not certain. He asked if Mr. Harner was present at the meeting to ask. Ms. Saslaw asked if certainty was the answer or is it intention. Ms. Saslaw asked if Vice Chairman Trigueiro can say in certainty that 18 months ago he signed a certain prescription for a particular patient. She stated he might believe that he did but could he say with absolute certainty? Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated he writes 50-60 prescriptions a day, it is not like he signs 6 documents. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated he had no dog in this fight. He stated he is there as a member of the board of trustees to do what he believes is the right thing. He stated when an affidavit says that “I believe I gave somebody authority to do that,” to him, as a member of the board of trustees…as an analogy he used himself getting a consultation from an oncologist that states they believe the patient has cancer. Well, what do they do? They are not certain, so they should not open them up because they are not certain it is there, I only believe it might be there. So, they do a biopsy, and guess what? It is not cancer, so great, they do not need to do the surgery. He stated the word “believe” means something but it is not done in certainty. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated the other thing that came up was someone mentioned the practicing of signatures. He asked if it was a wise practice to have the President of the College to sign the signature of the board of trustees. Mr. Prouty stated it was not a wise practice, it is not a yes or no, is it a best practice? probably not, is a wise practice? it depends on the beholder of wisdom. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked if they were going to do that would it be best to do something in writing saying I, authorize the president to sign my signature in such a case. Mr. Prouty stated that would need to be signed by a person who apparently was not able to sign at the time. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked him if he signed those documents. Dr. Hafner stated yes, and practiced his signature to do so. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked, if he had Mr. Harner’s authorization, why would practice if you had their authorization. He asked why he did not sign it on behalf of Mr. Harner so it is perfectly clear that he signed the document for him. He stated attorneys have always told him to do it that way on a legal document. He asked if the document in question is in fact a legal document. Chairman Beruff stated it is an application for the grant for the collegiate school. Chairman Beruff stated there is a lot of information for the board to digest and Dr. Hafner can give the board whatever information he has. He asked the board if they would like to continue the discussion this evening. He again stated he had an affidavit from Mr. Porges who was the attorney for the college for 40 years and everyone was welcome to a copy of that affidavit. Dr. Hafner stated he read the affidavit of the principal that was involved with the signature. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked how this fell into the Chairman’s lap. Chairman Beruff stated it came from a person who no longer works at the college. He stated she left of her own

23


volition. Dr. Hafner stated she took public documents. Chairman Beruff stated it was brought to his attention and that they are public documents. Dr. Hafner stated it should not have been taken out of the office. Chairman Beruff stated Dr. Hafner could argue with her about that, he was just reacting to the document as he thought it was his fiduciary responsibility to do so. He stated he has relayed the scenario and the time frame of how he did it and how he went to get advice from Mr. Porges because he has been involved for 40 years with the college. He stated he has not served in this capacity and he was unsure of what to do so he followed Mr. Porges advice and hired the forensic person. He stated it is not his intent to falsely accuse anybody of anything and that is why he went the extra steps, to make sure there was validity to this accusation and not just a rumor to throw out there. He stated he has been carrying this around for 6 ½ months and today is the best day because he is not carrying it anymore. He stated he has done his duty and he is one member with one vote. The board can decide how it reacts to the information at the next meeting and he will certainly abide by that. He stated it has been no fun carrying this around. Dr. Hafner asked if that was the purpose then why did he wave it at him and tell him to resign. Chairman Beruff stated he wanted Dr. Hafner to go away quietly because he did not want to have this whole thing and have it be a big thing in the newspaper like it is going to be now. Dr. Hafner stated he does not think the people in the room would want him to go away quietly. Chairman Beruff said “well, okay, well then don’t,” and that is why they are there. He stated he does not have a problem being there, he is done. Mr. Miller stated there is an easy solution, they could buy Dr. Hafner’s contract out. Chairman Beruff stated the solution is up to the board. He stated he is just one member that has been carrying this crap [the Chairman apologized for using that term in public] around for 6 ½ months, and he has come to the conclusion that he is done, he stated so now it is up to you guys. He stated they have the packet he provided, they have the affidavit from Mr. Porges who did the interview directly himself with Mr. Harner. He stated he does not understand the huge discrepancies in the affidavit but he did not write them. He stated Greg Porges is a respected attorney who has been in this town for a long, long time. Ms. Moore asked if before the Chairman went to Mr. Porges did he consult with Mr. Prouty. Chairman Beruff stated he did not consult with Mr. Prouty because he felt that there was a proximity to the President. He stated, first of all, that he wanted independent counsel, someone that was not related to the situation but who understood the history of the college so Mr. Porges is the guy. Plus, he has known Mr. Porges for over 20 years and his law firm has represented him. He stated that is no secret that Tim Knowles represents him and so he felt comfortable going to Mr. Porges. He stated it was perfect. He has been here 40 years, he knows how colleges work and Mr. Porges knows all the laws and rules so he decided to go talk to him. He asked if he answered Ms. Moore’s question. Ms. Moore asked if Mr. Prouty was just learning about this today. Mr. Prouty stated he is learning big pieces of it for the first time today. He stated, as Mr. Beruff stated, he was in a brief meeting with Mr. Beruff and Dr. Hafner when they first addressed. Dr. Hafner stated that was the first time it was addressed in front of Mr. Prouty but he had already interacted with Chairman Beruff before. Ms. Moran asked Mr. Prouty if he has had private discussions with Dr. Hafner regarding this matter. Mr. Prouty stated only subsequent to the meeting with Mr. Beruff to suggest that Dr Hafner do something about it. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked Mr. Prouty if he would share with the board what he said to Dr. Hafner since he represents the board as well as the President. Mr. Prouty stated he told Dr. Hafner that he needs to address the matter. He stated he told him the same thing he told Mr. Beruff, in that he thought it would be a difficult

24


case to make that this rose to the level of criminal forgery because of the intent issues that would be involved in that regard. He stated he opined to him that there were other statutes that were not quite as clear whether or not it was a problem or not and he suggested that Dr. Hafner retain separate counsel from himself. Ms. Moran asked if there was only one private meeting. Mr. Prouty stated he could not say they only discussed it once. Mr. Beruff stated there were only 2 private meetings. One in his office where Dr. Hafner’s recollection differs from his own and the second meeting in Dr. Hafner’s office. Mr. Prouty clarified that Ms. Moran was asking about Mr. Prouty and Dr. Hafner privately. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated that Mr. Prouty advised that this may not rise to the level of criminal forgery. Mr. Prouty confirmed. He asked if that was an appropriate response as a college attorney to give a person legal advice as to the potential liability. Mr. Prouty stated he needed to understand the question better. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated that Mr. Prouty said he told Dr. Hafner that he is not sure whether this would rise to the level of criminal forgery. Mr. Prouty confirmed. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated that is the kind of information an attorney would give a client not a college attorney who is also the board’s attorney, would say to the other party in a dispute between the Chairman of the Board of Trustees and the President. He stated he would expect the attorney to be neutral. He stated he would have expected him to only advise him to get his own attorney. Mr. Prouty stated he wishes it was as black and white as Vice Chairman Trigueiro’s. He stated he works for Dr. Hafner too. Dr. Hafner does his evaluation, he signs his paycheck. Mr. Prouty stated he had the same conversation with Chairman Beruff in stating that he was not sure if the forgery statute was going to make it because of the criminal intent portion. Chairman Beruff stated that he does not care, it is just off his plate. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked if they could deal with this at the next meeting without giving required notice that they were going to discuss this issue. Mr. Prouty stated he believes that it would be the Attorney General’s Opinion of something this controversial being a part of the notice of that meeting. Vice Chairman Trigueiro suggested they schedule another meeting. Ms. Neal stated there is plenty to digest and she certainly will not feel comfortable without a much bigger conversation. She stated she is having trouble understanding the conflicting affidavits and how they resolve that information and how that impacts their decision. She stated they need to resolve from Mr. Porges and Mr. Harner in some manner the conflicting affidavits. Chairman Beruff stated there is a process they need to abide by. He stated Florida Statute, Education Code, Florida College System Institution Board of Trustees Powers and Duties, subsection 1001.64 subsection 3, “A board of trustees shall have the power to take action without a recommendation from the president and shall have the power to require the president to deliver to the board of trustees all data and information required by the board of trustees in the performance of its duties. A board of trustees shall ask the Commissioner of Education to authorize an investigation of the president’s actions by the department’s inspector general if the board considers such investigation necessary. The inspector general shall provide a report detailing each issue under investigation and shall recommend corrective action. If the inspector general identifies potential legal violations, he or she shall refer the potential legal violations to the Commission on Ethics, the Department of Law Enforcement, the Attorney General, or another appropriate authority.” Chairman Beruff stated he thinks it would be prudent for the board to consider taking that action so they can let an independent third party do the investigation so all the finger pointing is out of the way. Ms. Saslaw stated she would like to repeat what Mr. Harner said to her and that was, if Dr. Hafner had ever signed a document that he had not authorized that he would be the first person to blow the whistle on it. She asked it if would help to hear from Mr. Harner.

25


Chairman Beruff stated he did not force Mr. Porges to write the affidavit. Ms. Neal stated she feels they should hear from Mr. Porges and Mr. Harner. Chairman Beruff stated he feels it needs to be investigated by someone other than them. He stated that is not their job. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated he is not sure if they are capable of getting the two conflicting affidavits resolved. He stated he feels there will be a legal thing down the road and if there is a mechanism that already exists for handling stuff like this. Vice Chairman Trigueiro motioned that the board of trustees shall ask the Commissioner of Education to authorize an investigation of the president’s actions by the department’s inspector general, and Ms. Moran seconded. Chairman Beruff asked if there was any further discussion. Ms. Saslaw stated it was absurd. Ms. Moore asked if before they do the investigation could they have a small gathering of Mr. Porges and Mr. Harner with the board to avoid further costs. Chairman Beruff stated he spoke with Chancellor Hanna on an unrelated matter and Randy asked him what was going on so he told him what was going on and he stated there is no cost to the college. Dr. Hafner stated this is all part of the witch hunt to try to bloody him up and basically put him under a microscope. He stated we have an affidavit from the individual involved in this process and he thinks what Ms. Moore is suggesting is either that gentleman can come in here and stand on his own two feet because he is the one that recollects it, along with himself. Not a third party in Greg Porges, and by doing this investigation Chairman Beruff is doing exactly what he suggested would happen at the first meeting where he told him to resign or he was going to destroy his reputation. Dr. Hafner stated that the Chair knows exactly what he said and that he cannot laugh his way out of this. Dr. Hafner stated the bottom line is what the Chairman has done and stated has the wheels in motion with this board. Chairman Beruff asked Dr. Hafner if he was alleging that he turned Mr. Porges into a liar. Dr. Hafner stated the Chairman did not have to get Mr. Porges involved in this. He asked why the board would not take the time to hear from both of those members. Chairman Beruff stated again, that Mr. Porges is a respected attorney in this town. Dr. Hafner stated they should bring the party involved in this process and bring them before the board. Chairman Beruff asked what they were afraid of? He stated if there is an investigation, what do they have to hide? Dr. Hafner stated there is nothing to hide because the affidavit specifically states that he told him to sign. Chairman Beruff stated if they ask for an investigation by Tallahassee, part of what governs them, what is the problem? It does not cost them any money. Dr. Hafner stated it will cost the taxpayer’s money. Chairman Beruff stated that is part of their responsibility. Dr. Hafner asked if now he’s willing to use taxpayer’s money on something as erroneous as this? Chairman Beruff stated he does not find it erroneous when you have an affidavit signed by an attorney that has been an attorney for the college for 40 years. Chairman Beruff asked everyone in the audience to cooperate. He stated he has always been open to the audience speaking and he will continue to do that. Ms. True asked why they are calling attention to the college for all the wrong reasons. She asked why they are focusing on this. Chairman Beruff stated his fiduciary responsibility when fraud is thrown in his face. Dr. Hafner stated he could not call it fraud. Chairman Beruff stated the alleged forgery and stated their position is very simple. He stated they are entrusted to manage the facility and for the taxpayer and the benefits of the staff and students. If something comes up that violates a law you cannot cover it up. Ms. True asked the board to let Mr. Harner speak for himself and settle this and get on with the business of education and serving the community.

26


Chairman Beruff stated he has no question with that, it is the board’s prerogative. He stated he is only giving them a mechanism that allows and is part of the statute that they can abide by. Ms. Neal asked Mr. Prouty if the board calling people to speak in front of them is appropriate or if by virtue of the fact that the mechanism is that they call the people and then give the board their decision. Mr. Prouty stated that some people are going to want to hear face to face what someone has to say as opposed to it being filtered and transcribed through the Inspector General’s Office. He stated Chairman Beruff is correct, that this process is in the statute and it is there for a reason. He stated it is the board’s call on whether they would prefer to hear directly from the person or they would rather have the Inspector General conduct an investigation that the board is clearly authorized to ask for. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated if they are acting as a grand jury we are going to have a trial and someone is going to have to be the prosecutor and someone will be the defense attorney. He stated he finds that inappropriate and counterproductive to what Ms. True was saying as getting back to running, he stated they are not going to get back to running the college if they are dealing with this mess. He stated he doubts it is going to be over in one meeting. He stated what will they do if Mr. Porges comes in and says Mr. Harner said exactly what I said in the affidavit? “I did not give Dr. Hafner my authorization to sign my signature on that document” and I asked him specifically and he said “no,” as that is what he said in his affidavit. Then, in Mr. Harner’s affidavit he said “I believe I gave him the authorization.” Dr. Trigueiro stated he does not want to get into this stuff. He said the Chairman dumped it and he thinks they should now turn it over to the proper mechanism which is why he made the motion. He stated they should get it out of the board’s hands and out of the newspaper. He does not want to have another board meeting, another “he said - she said” because they will both get up and say exactly what they said in their affidavit. Ms. Neal stated what she would like is the appropriate party to handle this, and she does not think it is their responsibility or right to call people in to speak to them and then still have to turn it over. She stated she is hesitant to take on that responsibility of being the attorney. She would like the matter to be handled appropriately and then have it be over and move on. Mr. Miller stated 4 of the 7 items the Chairman addressed during his opening statement, he is actually trying to undue. Chairman Beruff stated he is not trying to undue anything. It is only his opinion. Mr. Miller stated that 4 of the 7 are action of the previous board from 2010 and 2011. Chairman Beruff said to read all the background materials. Mr. Miller stated he was at the meetings and he knows. Chairman Beruff stated there was a motion on the table with a second and asked if there was any further discussion from the board. The vote was roll called with Ms. Moran, Ms. Moore, Chairman Beruff, Vice Chairman Trigueiro and Ms. Neal voting in favor of the motion and Mr. Miller and Ms. Saslaw opposed. The motion carried five to two. Chairman Beruff stated he did not think there was anything else for them to discuss at this meeting. Chairman Beruff asked Mr. Prouty if he knew what he needed to do. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked if the board would need their own legal counsel. He stated having read some newspaper articles about college presidents and board problems of major magnitude including the University of Virginia that just fired its president. An audience member stated that she resigned. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated that was a choice, resign or be fired. He stated that is big news in the northeast and these things do not go quietly in

27


the night. He stated that Dr. Hafner’s reputation is at stake and he is going to fight like he needs to do to defend his reputation and he should. The board of trustees have their fiduciary responsibility to do what it is supposed to do and the Chairman of the Board of Trustees was told by an attorney who was legal counsel to the college for 40 years that he had a fiduciary responsibility once this was thrust into his hand without his prior knowledge, to do something with it, so we do not have another Penn State type of deal, but not the same magnitude. He stated but that was a situation where people were … Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated he would withdraw that analogy. He stated he does not want the president of a board have a fiduciary responsibility to do something and not do it. He stated he believes it has a high probability of coming to legal action between Dr. Hafner and the college. He stated that does not mean it is absolute, it may resolve and he stays and they are all happy but he thinks there is a greater probability that it is going to go that way, so he thinks the board should have representation of its own. Ms. Saslaw stated she agreed with what Ms. Neal had to say. She stated the only thing that stops her from saying that they do not put on this full blown show, which clearly they are going to do, is that they are talking about a document for an application for the collegiate school. They are not saying that he forged a check, they are talking about getting an application in at the appropriate time and getting permission from the then chairman of the board to sign his name. She stated yes, if she were going to do that, she would practice it too. She stated she understands what Vice Chairman Trigueiro is saying, but she would have gone either way with it. She asked if they are really going to take this to the state. She stated they are talking about an application for something the board of trustees had approved. She stated it is really a thin thread to her to put somebody’s job on the line. Ms. Neal stated that her motivation is that she is incapable of determining which affidavit is correct. She stated she is unwilling to ask Mr. Porges, who she wanted to say publicly is her attorney in other matters. Ms. Neal stated he is her estate attorney and has been and asked if that was a problem. She stated he has done her estate for 34 years. She did not want someone to find in the newspaper that Mr. Porges is her attorney. She asked if anyone would like to address that. An audience member thanked her for being honest. Someone else stated that it was unfortunate she was only honest after the vote. Ms. Neal stated he is her estate attorney and she is unwilling to stand and ask anyone to come here and explain which person is telling the truth. She stated that is not her responsibility as a member of the board of trustees. Ms. Moore stated what Ms. Neal said earlier made a lot of sense to her even if they had asked them there in a discreet way, that it would still end up going anyway to the Board of Education. Chairman Beruff asked if there was a motion to retain independent counsel. Vice Chairman Trigueiro motioned for the board to retain independent counsel for the matter aforementioned in the referral to the State Board of Education about the alleged infraction. Ms. Neal asked Mr. Prouty if they would need that to receive a determination. She stated they would receive a determination on whether this is actionable. She asked if the board needs counsel in that regard. Mr. Prouty stated it is premature to decide that because the process allows for the Inspector General and the Commissioner after the Inspector General reports to potentially refer on to either FDLE or the Commission on Ethics, or they could dismiss it. He stated it would be hard to know until they know of the Inspector General’s findings. Ms. Neal stated that would be her concern. Vice Chairman Trigueiro withdrew his motion.

28


Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated they needed to set up the next meeting. Chairman Beruff stated they will turn it over to Tallahassee and wait. He stated the next meeting is the budget meeting. Chairman Beruff stated they are going to have to wait for them to tell them what to do on this matter. Ms. Saslaw asked where it leaves them as far as completing the President’s evaluation. Chairman Beruff stated it is on hold. Mr. Prouty asked for clarification regarding the independent counsel issues. He stated he was addressing Ms. Neal on whether or not they needed independent counsel at this time. Mr. Prouty stated referral to the Inspector General is something his office can appropriately handle but it is up to the board. He stated he has never been through this process and he is not sure how much information the Inspector General is going to want to address with the board. Chairman Beruff stated he is perfectly good with Mr. Prouty sending the information to the Inspector General. Mr. Prouty stated they can revisit it as they go along. Vice Chairman Trigueiro apologized for the analogy he used regarding Penn State and stated it was a poorly chosen analogy because these issues are of a totally different magnitude and again, offered his personal apology. He stated he personally likes Dr. Hafner. He stated if you have never had anyone in your family that you love, but you totally disagree with what they did, then he doesn’t believe it. He stated he can actually say that he likes Dr. Hafner but it does not mean that he has to approve of everything that he does. He stated the alleged forgery thing is the only thing that is important, the rest of the stuff is just stuff that happened in the board. He stated the evaluation questions they received for Dr. Hafner were compounded. It seemed there were 3 or 4 questions within a question and it was hard for him to answer the questions. He suggested when they do the president’s evaluation that they ask one question and answer that. Chairman Beruff gave the current evaluation forms back to the board’s assistant. Dr. Hafner reminded the Chairman that he received a notice that Judge Nicholas would like to speak at the meeting. Chairman Beruff invited the Judge to speak and welcomed his comments.

Judge Nicholas:

I am not here in official capacity in terms of my job. I appreciate the opportunity to address you, the hour is late, I will be brief, although I honestly don’t know where to begin. I should tell you that I am on the Foundation Board. As you know that is a voluntary board charged with the goal of raising millions of dollars to help support the mission of this school and I think your decision today and your decisions for the last 18 months, I don’t think you have considered, at all, the impact that those decisions have on our Foundation. It is getting more and more difficult to go to those people, given the tenor here, so I speak in that regard. I am also on the Kiwanis Club of Bradenton Board of Directors and as you know we donate close to a million dollars in scholarships to this school and I must tell you that there is a great deal of concern in the community about this board. And finally, my dad was the founding President of this school. As most of you know, his picture hangs in the auditorium. My siblings went here, my brother pitched for Coach Wynn, my sister is a Hall of Famer. I love this school, it is a wonderful place. I practically grew up on this campus, and I have to tell you that I am very, very troubled with what I see. I have to tell you that this business about a forgery, in my opinion, is ridiculous. We have the individual, whose supposedly gave permission to it, saying he gave permission to it in an Affidavit. We

29


have him having spoken to an actual board member, Ms. Saslaw, saying ‘I gave permission’ for him to sign that document. What more do you want? You have appointed an independent investigation that is going to tell you just that. They are going to tell you that there is an Affidavit from Greg Porges that contradicts that and what is that going to tell you? How does that help? That independent board is going to give you nothing more than you have right now. And yet, that independent investigation is going to have a dramatically negative impact on this community. I know the hour is late. I know you are eager to leave, but you are destroying the morale of this school. Everyone walks around on eggshells. Your micromanagement style is destructive and there is an inexplicable hostility that has been present from the very beginning. That is from an outsider. That is from someone who doesn’t know you, or any of you. I recall Boards when my father was President, people like Hal Chasey and Dr. Newhall, who loved this school; who were committed to this school; who were appointed to serve on the Board of this school because they loved it, because they gave money to the school. I don’t have a dog in this fight, I really don’t. Your decision with regard to Dr. Hafner is yours. I must tell you though that if you’re suggesting that this is forgery, every nurse at one point is virtually guilty of forgery. Every wife at some point is virtually guilty. Every secretary is virtually guilty of forgery. It is not a forgery. It is not a forgery when the person says I gave permission to the person to sign my signature. The rumor is - if you really want to know - is that you want Dr. Hafner out and the Governor is going to appoint Mike Bennett as the President. Now, that sounded as ridiculous to you, but that is the atmosphere that you have created. Let me finish. That is the atmosphere that exists here, wherein there is this hostility between the Board and the Staff, the Board and the Teachers. It is bizarre and it is disruptive. I don’t know what your plans are with regard to Dr. Hafner, I really don’t. I do know that your aggressive and hostile style is impacting our donors. I do know that your micromanagement is a significant concern to the people in this community, and I do know that my father is turning over in his grave.

Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated that having heard the Judge speak at the Graduation ceremony he has an understanding of the Judge’s fondness for the college. He stated the Judge actually lived on campus and he understands that he has a love for the college. He stated there is another segment of the community that would disagree with a lot of what they just heard. He stated there is a former board member that said when they were on the board, the board talked about vision and did not get into organizational day to day activities. He stated they have a $1 million 6 tennis courts at $240,000 in design fees only. He stated that is not a good use of the college’s money or the Foundation’s money. He stated that is an organizational detail. He stated the college has a charter school. He said he loves charter schools and we have an excellent charter school and the college put in $5.1 million into the charter school and the infusion of funds to that charter school is not done and even when it is done and they are in a positive cash flow they can expect about $9,000 a month in revenues above expenses. He stated the board could decide that the collegiate school has to pay back the college $5.1 million and running and it would take about fifty years. He stated that is an organizational detail and he would submit that he as a board member takes his fiduciary responsibilities very seriously and he can tell everyone, as a physician, his nature is to be a healer and not a destroyer. He read Ms. True’s comment in the Sarasota Herald Tribune and he said he is sorry that she feels that way. He stated that he loved all but two of his professors and one of them did not get tenure, because he was a bad professor. He stated he has nothing but the highest respect for all of the instructors in the school because they have educated some of his staff, they will educate his grandchildren, and they are educating his wife. He stated he does not want them to think, and it

30


made him sad to see that Ms. True feels that way. He stated she is confusing, from his viewpoint, Ms. True is confusing what they are doing, which is their job and their duty under the laws of the State of Florida as it relates to the school. He stated this board is different than the board that existed in the past. This board is looking at the organizational day to day operations of the college. They are holding the administration and everyone sitting around the table toe’s to the fire to how they spend the money at the college. He stated a lot of them believe, as it has been clear, that it has not been done in a prudent manner and it has cost the college a lot of money that should not have had to be spent. He stated hopefully we can go forward as gentlemen and gentlewoman who choose simply to disagree and to do so with the discourse which is in a civil manner, without personal attacks and go and move the school forward where it needs to go in the academic programs. He stated he has been trying to do academic programs since he was appointed. He stated every one has been stalled for one reason or another. Chairman Beruff asked Judge Nicholas to clarify if the Foundation has been suffering for 18 months. Judge Nicholas stated it has been increasingly a problem. He stated there is definitely a negative perception out there. Chairman Beruff stated he would take two more questions from the audience because we all need to get out of there and they were not going to accomplish much more that evening. Ms. Jane Jones stated that she personally has had a lot of problems with some of the decisions that the administration has made over the past 2-3 years but she also believes that the way that this board has proceeded has been driven far more by politics than it has been by any sort of real educational responsibility and she has found the acrimony in many of the board’s questions about what has been going on in the college very discouraging. She stated she has been a professor at the college for 30 years and that everybody knows that she has disagreed with the administration up down and sideways and made her voice very clear and very loud in the things that she has disagreed with. She stated she really finds the kind of political push behind the new board, not only in the decisions that it is making but in obviously trying to get rid of board members that disagree with the political impact that is coming on is very discerning. Chairman Beruff called a gentleman from the back of the room. He recognized the gentleman as former board member and chair, Ron Allen. Mr. Allen apologized for getting to the meeting late and not hearing some of the discussion because he just got off a plane. Chairman Beruff apologized for not recognizing Mr. Allen because he was in the shadows. He stated he only wanted to say two things at this meeting. He stated that the one thing that disturbs him the most out of the current board is that almost everything that comes out of their mouths and almost everything that comes out of the board never talks about the kids. Never talks about the students. He stated they are not elected legislators and they are reacting like an elected legislature. He stated their goal and responsibility when they were put on the board is to further the State College of Florida and since the current board has taken the helm they have not done one thing to promote the State College of Florida and the student education. He stated they have spent the entire time trying to undo what previous boards have done. He stated they talk about the $5 million for the charter school. He asked why this board would think that they can change the rules. He stated that charter school was set up by a previous board. He stated there was no discussion about a repayment mechanism of that $5 million, never. The board voted to approve those expenditures. He stated if they take that attitude they should go back twenty years and decide that the library or the science wing should pay that money back. He stated they are changing what other boards had set in motion and that is just wrong and you put it out into the newspaper that all of a sudden the $5 million cannot get paid back. He stated why

31


they don’t share with the newspaper that it was never intended to be paid back. He stated he thinks it is a travesty that they spend this much time, talking about, which every one of the board members know, that application is not a forgery issue. He stated he agrees with the Judge 100 percent. He stated he is not an attorney, he is just a common person, but the board is spending their entire time focused on that. He asked why they don’t tell the people what is going on with the students. He stated the charter school was ranked in the top 3 of the state. He stated they ought to spend time with the students Chairman Beruff stated everyone should recall that it was the current board who insisted that when they were going to upgrade the internet system for teaching, that it was the current board that insisted that the students be involved in that process. He stated they have constantly been focused on student involvement. He stated that decision and that direction came from this board and it did not come from the staff. In addition to that, he stated they should recall, time and time again that this board has asked for the students to be involved in the evaluation process because they are the customer and they are the clients. He stated to Mr. Allen, with all due respect, that he has not been at all the meetings to listen to all of the responses and comments from the board as it relates to the students. He stated they are 100% focused on getting the most value for the students and how to get them involved in not only the evaluation process but when they went to make a major change in the internet learning process they made them a part of that and the students congratulated them and thanked them for making them a part of that process. He stated he respects Mr. Allen’s comments but he thinks it is unfair to make comments based on what is read in the newspaper. He stated if he didn’t have to be there he would not be at the meetings either. He stated if they have not participated in the last 9 months. Vice Chairman Trigueiro addressed Mr. Allen’s comments. Mr. Allen stated he would be more than happy to have a formal debate. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated he was not going to debate. He stated when he first got on the board he proposed the school look at adding Chinese and Russian to their foreign language program because he believes those two languages are going to be the new business languages of the 21st century. He said, having seen funding issues, he is not sure where they will get the professors on that. He stated he continues to work on expanding the students slots for the Associates degree in Nursing and the BSN program because we need more nurses. He stated he has been working with Dr. Hafner and with Dean Hesselberg in increasing the number of slots. He stated it is not going to happen this year, but hopefully next year they will be able to increase it at least 10-15 in both programs. He stated he has been working on the side in getting the clinical slots to do the clinical work in. He stated he was told that is the reason they could not increase the number of slots now. He stated he proposed with Dr. Hafner they, SCF, approach Lake Erie College of Medicine to develop a 2+4 program where the students would come directly out of high school, admitted to LECOM coming to the State College of Florida for their first 2 years of a post-graduate degree in one of the three schools that LECOM has which would save 25% of the cost of the education to become a dentist, physician or pharmacist. He stated he has talked to LECOM students and they think that is a great idea. Why are they not doing it now? Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated he and Dr. Hafner have talked to LECOM about it and they are interested in doing a 3+4 program knocking a year off. He stated he thinks they can do it in a 2+4. He stated they have been talking about that but it has not made the newspaper. He stated the newspaper wants to write about the controversy. He stated the newspapers have been at many board meetings and when he and other people have talked about what Mr. Allen is saying they do not talk about, it never makes the newspaper. He stated he and Dr. Hafner met with LECOM and they did a photo session and he does not know where the photos went. He stated through Dr. Hafner’s work, the Lake Erie College of Medicine School of Pharmacy is slotting five positions in their

32


freshman class every year to an SCF graduate. He stated that is huge. He stated he asked them if SCF had a BSN nurse that decided she wanted to be a physician or pharmacist or a dentist, how could they be sure that she has met the requirements that LECOM has to get in. They said, let’s meet and be sure your science program and your math programs meet our standards. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated they are all busy people and have not had a chance to make that next step but that is something that he and Dr. Hafner have been working on. He stated at graduation he brought up to Dr. Hafner that it is too bad they have 65% of matriculated students that cannot pass math and 55% or thereabouts that cannot pass English so Dr. Hafner brought up the idea of a teacher’s institute which dovetailed into what he wants too and it is something they have been working on. To bring in a teacher’s institute to SCF, open statewide to work out a certificate and a possible master’s program through one of the universities to coach up the math teachers in public education to deliver the math teaching of the 21st century. He stated they have been talking about that and asked Dr. Hafner to speak up if he is saying something wrong. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated he has been to the library a couple times. Mr. Allen’s responded by saying that he appreciates that and that is wonderful and it sounds like Dr. Hafner is doing a hell of a job. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated, for him, the thing that came up that was really concerning to him is the major allegation. He proposes to the board that at the upcoming meeting they put money into remodeling the coffee shop at the library because who knows how long they will have to have it. He stated right now it is a dungeon. Ms. Elliott stated the whole building is a dungeon. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated he inspected that building 100 years ago and it was a sick building. He stated the building needs some major plastic surgery or replacement. He stated they voted for $840,000 that the college requested to enhance the college’s capability for E-education. The fastest growing student population, if you will, of this college, is electronic education. He stated the board gave them almost a million dollars that they requested, of additional funding to ramp up education so that the faculty, and several of them spoke about it, because the board had questions and the faculty explained why they needed it. He stated they gave them the $840,000. He stated they increased the marketing budget to try to find out why they are continuing to have decreasing student count at the school when other surrounding colleges are increasing their enrollment. He stated he told administration that under no circumstances would he vote for a tuition increase for the student’s this year. He stated if you want to do something for the students, you cut the cost of their education. He stated the students have had a 45% increase in tuition in over the last 5 years. He stated he was not then and he will not now and he will not in the foreseeable future vote to increase the tuition on the students. He stated that 45% needs to be amortized out over a longer period of time so that the cost is less. So, he said when Mr. Allen comes in and says they have done nothing about the focus of the job, the students, that he just was not there to hear the information. He stated he was not in the meetings with him and Dr. Hafner. Ms. Neal stated he didn’t read it in the newspaper. Mr. Allen stated his point to the whole thing is that the new board members were not in the previous board’s meetings to hear some of those things that they are turning into an attack now. He stated the $5 million for the charter school, had they been at the meeting and listened, they would have known that that is not an issue today. Had they been at that meeting. He stated is the same argument. Chairman Beruff disagreed because he was on that board.

33


Ms. True stated she would like to say, as Faculty Senate President, first of all, they applaud that this board with so many new trustees, wanted to get up to speed and dove right in to learn more. She stated they applaud this and they do not want it to be Dr. Hafner against the board and they do not want it to be the administration against the board. She stated they want to have a collaborative environment that is not toxic. She stated when Dr. Trigueiro asks why is it that all the good stuff that they want to do is not making the paper it is because of the negative emotions taking over. She stated people are scared and people do not like their jobs anymore and it is this board’s fault in large part because of how it has been handled. She stated maybe some of these things needed to come up but it is how it has been handled. She stated it has become very personal and it has become very emotional and like Ms. Jones stated, it has become very political. She stated in the meantime the focus is not on any of the good stuff that they do. The community at large isn’t paying attention to us and if you think if this goes to some kind of investigation that that is going to go away, it is not, it is only going to go into the media more, it is going to go viral. She stated it is going to be at every school and it cripples us as a college. Chairman Beruff stated that unfortunately, he had fiduciary responsibilities. Ms. Saslaw stated when Mr. Allen was Chair he always embraced the idea of having students come to the meetings and the meetings always started with a student that was being honored or a sports team, something that made them have the interaction. She now feels like they are in the ivory tower and she misses that terribly and she assumes the Chairman is responsible for that and she wishes he would consider. Vice Chairman Trigueiro motioned to adjourn and Ms. Moran seconded.

The meeting adjourned at 6:40 pm

______________________________ _____________________________ Carlos M. Beruff, Chair Lars A. Hafner, Secretary Board of Trustees Board of Trustees

34


MANATEE – SARASOTA

Date: June 26, 2012 Location: Lakewood Ranch Campus Proceedings: 1. The District Board of Trustees of State College of Florida, Manatee – Sarasota held a

regular meeting on Tuesday, June 26, 2012 at SCF Lakewood Ranch. Board Members Present: Edward Bailey, Carlos Beruff, Joe Miller, Lori Moran, Charlene Neal, Jennifer Saslaw, and Dr. Craig Trigueiro. Administrators Present: President Lars A. Hafner, Vice Presidents, Don Bowman, Jack Crocker, Mike Mears and Carol Probstfeld and General Counsel, Steve Prouty. Chairman Beruff called the meeting to order. Dr. Mears gave the Invocation which was followed by the Pledge of Allegiance.

2. Announcements Dr. Hafner announced with sadness as well as a grand thank you to honor three retirees, Dr. Bonnie Hesselberg, Dean of Nursing and Health Professionals and Provost at Lakewood Ranch Campus after 9 years of service. He stated she was very instrumental in turning the nursing program around and moving the college towards the BSN degree. Also, Coach Tim Hill is retiring from head baseball coach after 34 years of service. Dr. Hafner stated that Coach Hill is the winningest coach in Florida. He stated Coach Hill has graduated many athletes and saw them go on to the pros or into other colleges. Lastly, Gloria Shadburn is retiring from Accounting Supervisor and has been with the college for 32 years. Dr. Hafner stated she has done a lot of wonderful things for the College. He stated there will be a retirement party tomorrow on the Bradenton Campus and invited all to attend. Dr. Hafner announced that SCF was included in the Top 100 and Top 50 Associate Degree Colleges in the Community College Weekly. He stated the Top 100 Associate Degrees for all disciplines and included in the Top 100 listing of 2 year only colleges as well as associate degree colleges now offering workforce baccalaureate degrees. Dr. Hafner stated SCF was also included in the Top 50 Associate Degree for Arts and Sciences, general students and humanities. He described this as an important listing representing SCF’s standing as a strong Associate in Arts and transfer granting institution. Dr. Hafner stated the NJCAA athletic teams received all-academic teams and that credit goes to the coaches and many of the faculty that joined in the ManaTeen program that helps tutor the students. He stated the coaches and students in the area of women’s volleyball, women’s tennis and men’s baseball teams have achieved recognition of the 2011-2012 NJCAA all-academic team. The minimum grade point average requirement for consideration was a 3.0. The women’s volleyball program was 3.28 gpa, women’s tennis team was 3.36 gpa and the men’s baseball team was 3.07 gpa. Again, Dr. Hafner thanked the faculty that worked with the students as well as the student athletes and the coaches.

35

hugginn

Typewritten Text

EXHIBIT D

Proceedings, June 26, 2012 | 2

Finally, Dr. Hafner announced a partnership with USF in a reverse transfer grant initiative. He stated the grant is a project to identify students to transfer into the SUS institution from a state college before completing their AA degree. For identified transfer student who meet the eligibility and criteria the state college will perform degree audit in collaboration with the SUS institution. Those students who have accumulated the requisite credits at the university that complete the AA degree will have those credits transferred back to SCF as the state college and a completion of the AA degree will be posted on their transcripts. SCF will participate in the process in collaboration with USF. He stated that is another opportunity to gain completers that left SCF early but can now come back and get their degree from SCF.

3. Attorney’s Report Mr. Prouty reported that he has corresponded with the Commissioner’s office as directed at the last meeting and he is awaiting a response.

4. Approval of Non-Financial Consent Agenda Items Exhibit A: Minutes of December 8, 2011 Budget Subcommittee Meeting – Page 1

Exhibit B: Minutes of April 17, 2012 Special Meeting – Page 13

Exhibit C: Minutes of May 30, 2012 Regular Meeting – Page 19

Exhibit D: Amended Schedule of Non Credit Courses CCD Summer 2012 (201235) – Page 40

Exhibit E: Curriculum Development and Review Committee Recommendations for Programs and Courses – Page 41

Exhibit F: Human Resources Office Personnel Actions – Page 43

Exhibit G: SCFCS Monthly Report – Page 45 Ms. Saslaw motioned to approve, Vice Chairman Trigueiro seconded and the board unanimously approved.

5. Approval of Financial Consent Agenda Items

Exhibit H: Monthly Financial Report – May 2012 – Page 50

Exhibit I: Budget Amendments FY 2011-2012 May #43-46 (SCFCS Included) – Page 54

Exhibit J: SCFCS Financial Statements May 2012 – Page 58

Exhibit K: Property Disposals – Page 68

Exhibit L: Gifts and Grants – Page 88

Exhibit M: Authorization to Charge Off Delinquent Student and Other Accounts – Page 89

Ms. Moran directed the Board to page 58 of the Board Packet and asked for clarification of the amount under Liabilities and Net Assets for Deferred Wages. Dr. Probstfeld stated that would be the amount on May 31st that is owed since the college is on a two week payroll. Next, Ms. Moran directed the Board to page 59 of the Board Packet and asked for clarification of Materials and Supplies under expenses. She asked if that was for a one month period of $86,174.97. Dr. Probstfeld stated it was purchasing supplies for the following school year. Ms. Monod stated that would include the grant that was received to

36


purchase books. Ms. Moran pointed out that the number from the Subsidy from SCF Auxiliary on page 59 and the number for Subsidy from SCF Auxiliary on page 60 do not match. Ms. Kester stated there was an accrual from last year of $15,000. Chairman Beruff asked if there were any further questions regarding the Financial Consent Agenda Items. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked about the Board’s budget and if most of that was spent on copies. Dr. Probstfeld stated a lot was on copies as well as advertising. Mr. Miller motioned to approve, Ms. Saslaw seconded and the board unanimously approved.

6. Exhibit N: Approval of Recommended Prequalified Construction Contractors Dr. Hafner asked if this Exhibit could be deferred to the next meeting because they were not able to meet regarding the prequalified construction contractors due to the bad weather. Chairman Beruff stated they would defer Exhibit N until the August meeting.

7. Exhibit O: Tuition, Course Fees and Additional Fees Dr. Probstfeld stated they are proposing no increase in fees and no increase in fees that are indexed to the base tuition. She stated for the baccalaureate program they are required by statute to increase the fees based on what the legislature proposed so the base fee was increased but some of the index fees were decreased so the total cost to the student will remain the same. She stated there are also a variety of other fees related to courses and she reiterated that by statute those fees are only allowed to be actual cost of providing those services to the students. She stated some went up, some went down and some were new for new courses and some were deleted because the course is no longer offered. Chairman Beruff opened the public hearing and asked for public comment. Being no public comment the public hearing was closed. Vice Chairman Trigueiro moved to approve, Ms. Neal seconded and the board unanimously approved.

8. Exhibit P: Approval of SCF Operating Budget & Salary Schedule 2012-2013 Dr. Probstfeld stated the college is still operating with the same total dollars per FTE today that we were operating with in 2006. She stated the difference is that the burden has shifted from the state funding to the student funding the institution. She stated again that the total amount per FTE is the same as 2006. Next, Dr. Probstfeld showed the breakdown of enrollment recognizes that a substantial portion of enrollment is now online or distance learning. She stated they anticipate that portion of enrollment to continue to increase. Dr. Probstfeld discussed the idea of setting aside money for the capital program in the Fund 7 budget. She stated this budget sets aside $5 million for that capital plan and $4.4 million set aside for the disaster recovery fund. She stated they are proposing to transfer those two

37


amounts from the unrestricted Fund 1 operating fund balance into the restricted Fund 7 fund balance. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked if there was any other money from the disaster recovery amount. Dr. Probstfeld stated there is another $2.6 million left in the unrestricted Fund 1. Chairman Beruff clarified that is in addition to the $4.4 million with a total of $7 million. He asked about the $8 million that was previously discussed. Dr. Probstfeld stated they looked through the analysis again and the latest model came up with the $7 million. Dr. Probstfeld stated it changes each year. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked about the $2 million in the project priority list. Dr. Probstfeld stated every year they create a project priority list that is brought to the Board of Trustees. She stated they are small projects that are in amounts less than $300,000. She stated those projects will now be subject to the bid process. She stated that is money that is included from the student capital improvement fee. Traditionally the college would be able to get money from the state, which is PECO money. She stated this is the first year in recorded history that the college has not gotten PECO money, along with 11 other colleges, for routine remodeling activities. Mr. Miller asked if the funds identified in disaster recovery fund are restricted or if they have the flexibility to move money out of that account for something else. Dr. Probstfeld stated it can be moved within Fund 7 but once it is in Fund 7 it is permanently in Fund 7. Mr. Miller asked why they would want to put funds in an account that is restricted and lose the flexibility. Chairman Beruff stated if the money is in the unrestricted fund balance there is concern that Tallahassee could actually take some of that money back. If it is categorized it stays under the college’s control. Dr. Probstfeld stated they were advised this year to try to designate uses for that money. Ms. Saslaw asked if they identified an extraordinary need that was not anticipated would they be able to get permission to move some of that money out for a specific use. Dr. Probstfeld stated it could not be moved out of Fund 7 which is the Plant Fund. Chairman Beruff stated an emergency such as a roof collapsing could use this fund. Dr. Probstfeld next showed a chart representing the reinvestment program. She stated it showed things they would like to accomplish and the money they were asking the board to allow them to use from the operating fund balance to reinvest in particular initiatives that are largely related to e-learning, which include e-text, enhanced web capabilities, new online learning system, etc. Dr. Probstfeld asked for approval of the 2012-2013 Budget, Salary Schedule and Employee Contracts related thereto. Ms. Moran asked about the $80,186 for Enhanced Web Capabilities and stated that it includes the redesign for the Collegiate School website and questioned whether that should be separated. Dr. Probstfeld stated they have to be connected because people pass through the College website to get to the collegiate school. She stated it is a redesign of the College’s website that will subsequently link to the Collegiate School website. Ms. Moran asked if the costs were lumped together. Dr. Probstfeld stated the Collegiate School website was redesigned this year and the cost was passed through to the Collegiate School this year. Vice Chairman Trigueiro directed the board to page 158 of the board packet and stated he was curious as to the formula used for 9 month faculty, 10 month faculty and 12 month faculty. He asked why they were not linear. Ms. Beck stated it is a calculation that has been used for about 20 years. She stated it is based on time that is used but does not equate to exactly the number of days. She stated in some cases it is less, in some cases it is more. Dr. Mears stated the calculations are very close. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked if this was a state rule or College Rule. Ms. Beck stated it is a salary calculation that the board has approved for years. She stated the state does not determine what the College pays to the faculty. The College pays competitively and this is the calculation they use. Dr.

38


Probstfeld stated the appropriate way to look at it would be the days worked instead of months because during some terms there are less days taught due to vacation breaks. Ms. Beck stated faculty is paid a daily rate based on the number of duty days which are days in which class is in session. She stated 9 month faculty is paid for 164 days, 10 month faculty is paid for 194 days and 12 month faculty is paid for 247 days. She stated the College has very few that are paid for the 10 month and 12 month level. She stated that 99.5% of faculty is 9 month faculty. Dr. Probstfeld stated that in response to the board requests they have made arrangements for funding for the market study and that is included in the budget. She stated that the front of the library has been spruced up with painting of the sidewalk and new seating areas, etc. She stated plans are in place to do some work inside the library and café to spruce it up. Vice Chairman Trigueiro brought up the issue of a new basketball coach. He addressed Mr. Ennis, Director of Athletics, and stated he did not think the men’s basketball team was being treated equitably to the women’s softball and tennis teams. He asked if they could budget $50,000 for a basketball coach, not including benefits. He stated he does not think they will have a worthwhile program for a $10,000 stipend. Mr. Ennis stated all of the coaches are paid stipends. He stated he stands by the current coach. He stated they file an equity report every year and they work extremely hard to make sure the programs are equitable across all genders. He stated if they do for one team, they would have to do for all the teams. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked if they could create a position for the basketball coach along with a wellness program. After discussion, Vice Chairman Trigueiro agreed to table his thoughts to give the current coach a chance to move forward. Dr. Bowman stated all the athletic stipends are paid out of the Student Activity Fee out of Fund 2 and it is up to the students to make the decision on the salary choices. He stated the students approve the operating budget for intercollegiate athletics. Ms. Neal asked for further explanation. Dr. Bowman stated in the college budget there is a Fund 2 and within that Fund there is the Student Activity Fee. He stated the students through the Student Activity Budget Review Committee determines how the money they have paid for student activities will be allocated. He stated it is the students that make recommendations as to where their student activity fee is being placed for the year and what activities are going to be there to support them. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated the students make a recommendation on how the fee is spent but they do not actually decide how it is spent. Dr. Bowman stated it starts at the student level, goes through the President and eventually to the board in the budget that they are being asked to approve today. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked where that is in the current budget. Dr. Probstfeld directed the board to page 91, Exhibit O. Chairman Beruff asked what percentage of the recommendation usually comes to the board directly. He asked how much adjustment is usually made. Dr. Bowman stated whatever the students decide goes directly to the board for approval. Mr. Bailey asked if they want to make a change does it go back to the students or does the board have the final decision. Dr. Bowman stated the board has the final decision. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked if at the university level the students pay for the athletic departments. Dr. Bowman stated the universities have a separate athletic fee that the students have no choice but to pay. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked how much money the students have to give recommendations. Dr. Probstfeld again directed the board to page 91 of the board packet. She stated the student activity fee is $7.88 per load hour. Next she directed the board to page 108 of the board packet and showed the balance of student activities and service fees showing the proposed amount to be $1.8 million. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked how the students propose to spend that money. Dr. Bowman stated that information was previously provided to the board. Dr. Probstfeld stated it is in the proposed budget under Exhibit D at page 117

39


in the board packet. Ms. Kester suggested they show the expenditures by club. Dr. Probstfeld directed the board to page 140 to get the breakdown of Student Services. Dr. Bowman explained that, as an example, the students allocated money from their student activity budget so that the Academic Resource Center could be available on Sundays when students most need it. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked how the students vote on such issues. Dr. Bowman stated there is a Student Activity Budget Review Committee made up of student government executive committee on two of the campuses as well as four others from the respective campuses from intercollegiate club group as well as two from the PTK honor society. He stated they have two advisors from student activities as well as a student athlete in the group and that he, himself chairs as a non-voting member. Ms. Moran asked about the market research that Vice Chairman Trigueiro was proposing to use the $50,000 for. She asked if students could be involved in that process. Chairman Beruff suggested the professors in marketing make it a project as part of their curriculum. Dr. Bowman stated that was possible. Dr. Crocker stated currently there is a project being put together as part of the student engagement committee. He stated they are using a national survey which is accessing and doing focus groups throughout the next year of students. He stated that will provide student perceptions and input on how they see the college and how they are being engaged. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated he never intended the $50,000 to be spent on research. He intended the vast majority to be spent on marketing. He suggested a billboard for SCF showing tuition would not be increased. Dr. Probstfeld stated the budget provides for subsidizing the collegiate school for the last year. She stated they are on track with what they had indicated on the timeline. She stated she would present a proposal structuring the payback from the collegiate school for operating costs and auxiliary funds. She stated it will not impact the subsequent budget year. Mr. Miller spoke of getting the community back involved with the athletic programs. Dr. Bowman stated there are parameters already in place and the new basketball coach is fully supportive. Ms. Saslaw spoke of the Foundation event for the Baltimore Orioles. Mr. Miller motioned to approve Exhibit P Including the FY 12/13 Operating Budget, Associated Schedules and Employment Contracts, Ms. Saslaw seconded and the board unanimously approved.

9. Collegiate School Payback Dr. Probstfeld stated they have been working on amortization schedules and to burden the collegiate school with the actual construction and renovation costs would be cost prohibited. She stated there would not be a foreseeable time in the future that they could make that payment. She stated, more importantly, that if they did pay back those costs the building would then become an asset of the collegiate school. In the event the college was no longer in the collegiate school business, that building could become an asset of the public school system. Chairman Beruff asked if they could lease the building. Dr. Probstfeld stated that is her recommendation. She stated the college did front two sources of income to the collegiate school to get them started. The first is the auxiliary funds. She stated next year, when they have the full complement of students, they would then begin to pay back the college with a twenty year time period with an operating lease. The second part is the actual operating costs including electricity and custodial costs, etc. that the college has been covering. She stated they would also like to put that in an operating lease over twenty

40


years. She stated the collegiate school will receive PECO funds that can go towards payment of those leases as well as their regular operating costs. In addition she proposes that there be a line item in their budget going forward to cover the cost of the current value of their utilities, etc. Mr. Bailey asked the total amount over the last three years. Dr. Probstfeld stated the auxiliary fund total payment would be $3,600 a month and the operating funds would be roughly $1,200 a month. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked if they were forgiving the $3 million construction and renovation costs. Dr. Probstfeld stated that is the recommendation. Chairman Beruff asked if the collegiate school will ever generate more than just enough to pay the college back. Dr. Probstfeld stated if the legislature makes changes and gives more money per student they will generate more income. Chairman Beruff asked what would happen if excess cash built up at the collegiate school with PECO money. Dr. Probstfeld stated as time goes on they anticipate they will have to do basic maintenance and renovations. Vice Chairman Trigueiro brought up the collegiate school getting $109,000 in PECO money a year. Dr. Probstfeld explained that comes in at approximately $9,000 a month and some will go towards paying the leases. Chairman Beruff asked about the time frame. If the collegiate school is receiving $100,000 a year it should be able to pay back the $800,000 in 8 years. Dr. Probstfeld stated initially they are asking the collegiate school to make payments of $3,596 a month. She stated essentially they are sharing the PECO Dollars. Chairman Beruff stated if they are funding the collegiate school to begin with, and they are liable to take care of the maintenance, why not take all the cash that they can and fund as needed. That way the college remains in control of all the excess money. Dr. Probstfeld clarified that in the foreseeable future paying back the college and paying for utilities is going to take all the money that they receive. Chairman Beruff asked why they should amortize it over 20 years. Dr. Hafner stated that if the legislature raises the FTE it will generate more money and they could use that money to pay back that college as well as in 3 years when the collegiate contract is up the board can decide to add more students in the 11th and 12th grades that will be clear profit to the college. Mr. Miller clarified that the money for the dual enrolled students going to the college now currently goes to the school board. Mr. Bailey asked where the payback money is going. Dr. Probstfeld stated it would go into the operating budget. Mr. Bailey asked about setting the excess money aside to be used for future expansion of the collegiate school. Dr. Probstfeld stated that is what they are proposing. Ms. Saslaw asked if Dr. Probstfeld could provide the board with the rules so that they understand how the money can be used. Dr. Probstfeld clarified she wanted rules for using money that flows through the school district. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked if the building is big enough now to go through the 12th grade. Dr. Hafner stated the building was built for 450 students and they should understand that the 11th and 12th graders for the most part are in college classes on campus. He stated they can use the collegiate school as a hub or homeroom. He stated that would give the board ability in future years to expand the upper division because the students are out on the campus like dual enrolled students. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked if the collegiate school only has room for 6-10th grades. Dr. Hafner stated it is built for 6-12th grades, but it was taken into consideration when it was built that the 11-12th graders would not be in the building all day. They followed the rules and regulations of the county and state. He stated they have to have lockers for the students and take attendance, etc. Vice Chairman Trigueiro clarified that it is $9,000 a month of revenue in excess of expenses in two years. Dr. Probstfeld stated that the $9,000 a month is what she anticipates they will get, based on today’s number of FTE per month for PECO. She stated by next year they should be in the low six figures assuming the state continues to fund at a certain level. Chairman Beruff asked if that was net after utilities and reimbursements. Dr. Probstfeld stated that is gross. Chairman Beruff clarified there will be approximately $120,000 of unencumbered cash flow in 2013-2014. Mr. Miller stated he sits on another board that has 3 charter schools and they

41


lease space to the charter schools. He stated he thinks it is a good idea for the college to go in that direction. Chairman Beruff asked if he could provide a lease that they used. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked what they will do with the excess money not paid back. Dr. Probstfeld stated what is not in that amount is the utilities, security and custodial, etc. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked what that projected amount will be. Ms. Kester stated it is running approximately $134,000 a year for that building of which, 73% is used by the collegiate school expense. Chairman Beruff stated if we have $120,000 in free cash and it costs $93,000 to run the building there is only $27,000 in free cash flow to amortize. He stated it will take a long time for the collegiate school to pay the college back. He would like the lease to state it is a revenue sharing lease so if the collegiate school receives more money they can pay more to the college. Chairman Beruff stated eventually they should have a fund set up for all the excess money of the collegiate school to be distributed by the board as they deem appropriate and not under the collegiate school where it could become subject to the school board having jurisdiction over it. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked if they could stipulate a lease that stated the lease payment is the PECO funds in any given year. In other words, if they have no PECO funds there is no lease payment due but if they get half a million dollars in PECO funds that is their lease payment. Dr. Probstfeld said she would be happy with that arrangement because it is more flexible for everybody. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated the first and second withdrew their earlier motion to move forward with that idea. Ms. Neal asked for further information. Mr. Bailey asked if the high school students were allowed to pay on the college teams. Dr. Hafner stated the students need a high school diploma to play college sports. Dr. Bowman stated they are allowed to participate in other student activities and well as be in student government. Vice Chairman Trigueiro brought up the college bookstore and asked Dr. Probstfeld the explain profit margin and the revenue in excess of cost margin on textbooks. Dr. Probstfeld stated through the college bookstore sells many things. She stated there are different profit margins on the various books depending on the format in which those books are sold. She stated a hard copy book profit margin is 20 percent and that is probably the highest profit margin on anything sold in the store. Ms. Saslaw asked if that included accessories. Dr. Probstfeld said it did. Vice Chairman Trigueiro asked how much money the college makes on textbooks. Ms. Kester stated it is probably around $600,000 net on everything sold. Vice Chairman Trigueiro stated he was hoping to cut the costs of textbooks. It was announced that there would not be a July meeting. The meeting adjourned at 5:53 pm.

_____________________________ _____________________________ Carlos M. Beruff, Chair Lars A. Hafner, Secretary Board of Trustees Board of Trustees

42

1 | P a g e B o a r d o f T r u s t e e s A u g u s t 2 9 , 2 0 1 2

AMENDED SCHEDULE, CORPORATE & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, SUMMER 2012 (201235)

Course Number Course Title Start/End Time Start/End Date Instructor Course Fee 35615 ITTZ 73E01 L01 Excel 2010 - Level 1 930 1630 8/18/2012 8/19/2012 $ 50.00 35616 MUSZ 70228 BD2 Private Guitar/Marc Mannino 1200 1300 6/19/2012 7/31/2012 Mannino $ 290.00 35619 MUSZ 70226 VD1 Private Voice 1000 1100 7/5/2012 8/16/2012 Apple $ 290.00 35621 BCTZ 70109 LE1 MSSC RETEST 5/1/2012 8/31/2012 $ 40.00 35623 MRCZ 70151 0 First Run 700 1000 7/28/2012 7/28/2012 $ 55.00 35631 SJDZ 70122 0 Private Investigator Full Crse. 800 1700 5/1/2012 8/31/2012 $ 400.00 35632 SJDZ 70107 0 Private Investigator Intern-2 800 1700 7/11/2012 7/12/2012 $ 165.00 35637 ITTZ 8E005 L01 ed2go Online Course w/Fee $99 5/1/2012 8/31/2012 $ 99.00 35638 ITTZ 8E001 L01 ed2go Online Course w/Fee $89 5/1/2012 8/31/2012 $ 89.00 35639 ITTZ 8E006 L01 ed2go Online Course w/Fee $99 5/1/2012 8/31/2012 $ 99.00 35640 ITTZ 8E002 L01 ed2go Online Course w/Fee $89 5/1/2012 8/31/2012 $ 89.00 35641 ITTZ 8E007 L01 ed2go Online Course w/Fee $98 5/1/2012 8/31/2012 $ 98.00 35642 ITTZ 8E008 L01 ed2go Online Course w/Fee $98 5/1/2012 8/31/2012 $ 98.00 35643 BCTZ 70109 LD1 MSSC RETEST 1200 1600 5/1/2012 8/31/2012 $ 40.00 35644 HLTZ 70104 BE5 BLS for Health Care Providers 1730 2200 8/7/2012 8/7/2012 Cronkhite $ 65.00 35646 MUSZ 70236 BD1 Chamber Ensemble-Guitar 1230 1400 8/20/2012 12/13/2012 Willis Jr. $ 103.00 35650 ITTZ 8E019 L01 ed2go online course w/$109 Fee 5/1/2012 8/31/2012 $ 109.00 35651 BCTZ 70108 LE4 TBLManufacture Essential(ETAM) 1730 2130 7/23/2012 10/1/2012 $ 385.00 35655 MUSZ 70203 BD7 Piano/Turon 1600 1700 6/18/2012 9/6/2012 Turon $ 290.00 35656 ACAZ 70202 BE3 Refresher Math 1700 1900 8/27/2012 10/1/2012 $ 159.00 35662 BCTZ 70108 LO1 TBLManufacture Essential(ETAM) 1730 2130 8/28/2012 11/1/2012 $ 385.00 35669 CDAZ 70231 LD1 High Conflict Diversion Program 900 1100 8/22/2012 11/7/2012 $ 35.00 35670 CDAZ 70202 LD1 Redirecting Children Behavior 1100 1230 8/22/2012 12/5/2012 $ 25.00 35671 CDAZ 70231 VD1 High Conflict Diversion Program 900 1100 8/21/2012 11/6/2012 $ 35.00

43

hugginn

Typewritten Text

EXHIBIT E


SCHEDULE OF NON-CREDIT COURSES, CORPORATE & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT, FALL 2012 (2013-15) Course Number Course Title Begin/End Time Start/End Date Instructor Course Fee 15001 ITTZ 8RB73 BD1 Beginner Computer 3 (Win 7) 930 1630 9/7/2012 9/7/2012 $ 69.00 15002 MRCZ 70100 0 Motorcycle Riding & St. Skills 700 1500 9/1/2012 9/2/2012 $ 199.00 15003 MRCZ 70100 BK2 Motorcycle Riding & St. Skills 700 1500 9/8/2012 9/9/2012 $ 199.00 15004 MRCZ 70100 BK3 Motorcycle Riding & St. Skills 700 1500 9/15/2012 9/16/2012 $ 199.00 15005 MRCZ 70100 BK4 Motorcycle Riding & St. Skills 700 1500 9/22/2012 9/23/2012 $ 199.00 15006 MRCZ 70100 BK5 Motorcycle Riding & St. Skills 700 1500 9/29/2012 9/30/2012 $ 189.00 15007 MRCZ 70100 BK6 Motorcycle Riding & St. Skills 700 1500 10/6/2012 10/7/2012 $ 199.00 15008 MRCZ 70100 BK7 Motorcycle Riding & St. Skills 700 1500 10/13/2012 10/14/2012 $ 199.00 15009 MRCZ 70100 BK8 Motorcycle Riding & St. Skills 700 1500 10/20/2012 10/21/2012 $ 199.00 15010 MRCZ 70100 BK9 Motorcycle Riding & St. Skills 700 1500 10/27/2012 10/28/2012 $ 199.00 15011 MRCZ 70100 BW1 Motorcycle Riding & St. Skills 700 1500 11/3/2012 11/4/2012 $ 199.00 15012 MRCZ 70100 BW2 Motorcycle Riding & St. Skills 700 1500 11/10/2012 11/11/2012 $ 199.00 15013 MRCZ 70100 BW3 Motorcycle Riding & St. Skills 700 1500 11/17/2012 11/18/2012 $ 199.00 15014 MRCZ 70100 BW4 Motorcycle Riding & St. Skills 700 1500 11/24/2012 11/25/2012 $ 199.00 15015 MRCZ 70100 BW5 Motorcycle Riding & St. Skills 700 1500 12/1/2012 12/2/2012 $ 199.00 15016 MRCZ 70100 BW6 Motorcycle Riding & St. Skills 700 1500 12/8/2012 12/9/2012 $ 199.00 15017 MRCZ 70100 BW7 Motorcycle Riding & St. Skills 700 1500 12/15/2012 12/16/2012 $ 199.00 15018 MRCZ 70100 BW8 Motorcycle Riding & St. Skills 700 1500 12/22/2012 12/23/2012 $ 199.00 15019 MRCZ 70106 0 Group Riding Seminar 900 1100 9/8/2012 9/8/2012 $ 25.00 15020 MRCZ 70106 BK2 Group Riding Seminar 900 1100 10/13/2012 10/13/2012 $ 25.00 15021 MRCZ 70106 BK3 Group Riding Seminar 900 1100 11/10/2012 11/10/2012 $ 25.00 15022 MRCZ 70106 BW3 Group Riding Seminar 900 1100 12/8/2012 12/8/2012 $ 25.00 15023 MRCZ 70107 0 Girlz Garage Club 1900 2100 10/11/2012 10/11/2012 $ 25.00 15024 MRCZ 70107 BE2 Girlz Garage Club 1900 2100 12/6/2012 12/6/2012 $ 25.00 15025 MRCZ 70151 0 First Run 700 1000 9/29/2012 9/29/2012 $ 55.00 15026 MRCZ 70151 BK2 First Run 700 1000 10/27/2012 10/27/2012 $ 55.00 15027 MRCZ 70151 BK3 First Run 700 1000 11/17/2012 11/17/2012 $ 55.00 15028 MRCZ 70151 BK4 First Run 700 1000 12/15/2012 12/15/2012 $ 55.00 15029 MRCZ 70104 0 Motorcycle Experienced Rider 800 1700 9/30/2012 9/30/2012 $ 110.00 15030 MRCZ 70104 BK2 Motorcycle Experienced Rider 800 1700 10/28/2012 10/28/2012 $ 110.00 15031 MRCZ 70104 BK3 Motorcycle Experienced Rider 800 1700 11/18/2012 11/18/2012 $ 110.00 15032 MRCZ 70104 BK4 Motorcycle Experienced Rider 800 1700 12/16/2012 12/16/2012 $ 110.00 15033 LHVZ 70111 W 2.15 LHA with Final Exam 9/1/2012 12/31/2012 $ 120.00 15034 INSZ 70246 W 4.40 To 2.20 Conversion OnLine 9/1/2012 12/31/2012 $ 300.00 15035 INSZ 70229 W 20.44 FL Personal Lines(52hr) 9/1/2012 12/31/2012 $ 350.00

44

hugginn

Typewritten Text

EXHIBIT F


Course Number Course Title Begin/End Time Start/End Date Instructor Course Fee 15036 INSZ 70234 W 2.20 P&C/Gen Line Crs Onlin 9/1/2012 12/31/2012 $ 400.00 15037 INSZ 70104 W 5.20/6.20 Accedited Claims Adj 9/1/2012 12/31/2012 $ 300.00 15038 INSZ 70105 W RCSR 4.40 Course 9/1/2012 12/31/2012 $ 300.00 15039 LHVZ 70113 W 2-15LHA Practice ExamGenerator 9/1/2012 12/31/2012 $ 25.00 15040 LHVZ 70118 W 2.15 LHA Prac Exam Gen Plus 9/1/2012 12/31/2012 $ 35.00 15041 LHVZ 70114 W 2.15 Review LHA Pass/Prep 9/1/2012 12/31/2012 $ 50.00 15042 LHVZ 70107 W L,H &V A Tutorial 9/1/2012 12/31/2012 $ 90.00 15043 LHVZ 70105 W 2.20 P&C Pass/Prep Review 9/1/2012 12/31/2012 $ 90.00 15044 INSZ 70253 W 2.20 & 20.44 PracticeGenerator 9/1/2012 12/31/2012 $ 70.00 15045 INSZ 70231 W RCSR(40hr) 4.40 Pass/Prep 9/1/2012 12/31/2012 $ 90.00 15046 LHVZ 70104 W CE 14hr Health Ins Element 9/1/2012 12/31/2012 $ 85.00 15047 LHVZ 70103 W CE 14hr Life Insurance Element 9/1/2012 12/31/2012 $ 85.00 15048 LHVZ 70108 W CE 3hr Ethics Ins Industy 9/1/2012 12/31/2012 $ 25.00 15049 INSZ 70257 W 3hr CE Senior Suitability 9/1/2012 12/31/2012 $ 25.00 15050 INSZ 70230 W CE 3hr Health Saving Accts 9/1/2012 12/31/2012 $ 25.00 15051 LHVZ 70116 W CE 3hr Flood Ins Concepts 9/1/2012 12/31/2012 $ 25.00 15052 LHVZ 70110 W CE 3hr Ethics and the Client 9/1/2012 12/31/2012 $ 25.00 15053 INSZ 70233 W CE 3hr Flood (NFIP) 9/1/2012 12/31/2012 $ 25.00 15054 INSZ 70255 W CE 2hr Medicare Today 9/1/2012 12/31/2012 $ 22.00 15055 INSZ 70232 W CE 2hr Hurricanes 9/1/2012 12/31/2012 $ 22.00 15056 LHVZ 70117 W CE-2hr Wind Mitigation 9/1/2012 12/31/2012 $ 22.00 15058 LHVZ 70112 W 2.15 Correspondent Course(JEL) 9/1/2012 12/31/2012 $ 275.00 15059 INSZ 70224 LD1 CAT Adjuster Boot Camp 830 1700 9/10/2012 9/14/2012 $ 995.00 15060 INSZ 70224 LD2 CAT Adjuster Boot Camp 830 1700 9/24/2012 9/28/2012 $ 995.00 15061 INSZ 70224 LD3 CAT Adjuster Boot Camp 830 1700 10/22/2012 10/26/2012 $ 995.00 15062 INSZ 70224 LD4 CAT Adjuster Boot Camp 830 1700 11/26/2012 11/30/2012 $ 995.00 15063 MOWZ 70203 W What You Say Before You Speak 9/1/2012 12/31/2012 $ 90.00 15064 MOWZ 70204 W Intro to Relation-Bldg Found 9/1/2012 12/31/2012 $ 37.00 15065 MOWZ 70205 W CatchTrout,Don'tFish in Catfis 9/1/2012 12/31/2012 $ 25.00 15066 MOWZ 70206 W Create Effect, Powerful Verbal 9/1/2012 12/31/2012 $ 25.00 15067 MOWZ 70207 W Work an Event With Ease 9/1/2012 12/31/2012 $ 25.00 15068 MOWZ 70208 W Follow Up Is Golden 9/1/2012 12/31/2012 $ 25.00 15069 MOWZ 70209 W Bldg Relationships Bus&Career 9/1/2012 12/31/2012 $ 99.00 15070 HEVZ 701V0 1 Family Guardianship DVD 9/1/2012 12/31/2012 $ 135.00 15071 SJDZ 70100 LW1 Security Officer-24hr 800 1700 9/7/2012 9/9/2012 Foster $ 210.00 15073 SJDZ 70100 LW2 Security Officer-24hr 800 1700 11/2/2012 11/4/2012 Foster $ 210.00 15075 SJDZ 70101 LW1 Security Officer-16hr 800 1700 9/22/2012 9/23/2012 Foster $ 140.00

45


Course Number Course Title Begin/End Time Start/End Date Instructor Course Fee 15077 SJDZ 70101 LW2 Security Officer-16hr 800 1700 11/17/2012 11/18/2012 Foster $ 140.00 15079 SJDZ 70106 LW1 Private Investigator Intern- 1 800 1700 9/7/2012 9/9/2012 Chambers $ 235.00 15080 SJDZ 70106 VW1 Private Investigator Intern- 1 800 1700 9/14/2012 9/16/2012 Kemper $ 235.00 15082 SJDZ 70106 BW3 Private Investigator Intern- 1 800 1700 10/12/2012 10/14/2012 Chambers $ 235.00 15083 SJDZ 70106 LW2 Private Investigator Intern- 1 800 1700 11/2/2012 11/4/2012 Chambers $ 235.00 15085 SJDZ 70107 LW1 Private Investigator Intern-2 800 1700 9/22/2012 9/23/2012 Chambers $ 165.00 15086 SJDZ 70107 VW1 Private Investigator Intern-2 800 1700 9/29/2012 9/30/2012 Kemper $ 165.00 15088 SJDZ 70107 BW3 Private Investigator Intern-2 800 1700 10/27/2012 10/28/2012 Chambers $ 165.00 15089 SJDZ 70107 LW2 Private Investigator Intern-2 800 1700 11/17/2012 11/18/2012 Chambers $ 165.00 15094 HLTZ 70104 BS1 BLS for Health Care Providers 900 1330 9/8/2012 9/8/2012 Komarov $ 65.00 15097 HLTZ 70104 BE2 BLS for Health Care Providers 1730 2200 10/9/2012 10/9/2012 Komarov $ 65.00 15101 HLTZ 70104 BS3 BLS for Health Care Providers 900 1330 11/17/2012 11/17/2012 Komarov $ 65.00 15105 MONZ 70243 VD1 Stop the Financial Insanity 930 1200 10/9/2012 10/23/2012 $ 65.00 15106 MONZ 70243 LE1 Stop the Financial Insanity 1830 2100 10/10/2012 10/24/2012 $ 65.00 15107 MONZ 70243 LE2 Stop the Financial Insanity 1830 2100 11/5/2012 11/12/2012 $ 65.00 15108 MONZ 70245 BE1 Savvy Social Security Planning 1830 2130 10/25/2012 10/25/2012 Smelser $ 29.00 15109 MONZ 70245 BD1 Savvy Social Security Planning 900 1200 10/27/2012 10/27/2012 Smelser $ 29.00 15110 MONZ 70245 LE1 Savvy Social Security Planning 1830 2130 11/8/2012 11/8/2012 Smelser $ 29.00 15111 MONZ 70245 LD1 Savvy Social Security Planning 900 1200 11/10/2012 11/10/2012 Smelser $ 29.00 15112 MONZ 70219 VE1 Retirement Planning Seminar 1830 2130 10/11/2012 10/18/2012 $ 62.00 15113 MONZ 70219 VD1 Retirement Planning Seminar 900 1200 10/20/2012 10/27/2012 $ 62.00 15114 BCTZ 70100 BD1 AHIT Home Inspection Training 800 1800 11/30/2012 12/2/2012 $ 1,795.00 15115 HEVZ 70100 OD1 Family Guardianship Training 800 1700 11/15/2012 11/15/2012 $ 110.00 15116 HEVZ 70102 LD1 Guardian ad Litem Program 900 1600 9/6/2012 9/14/2012 $ - 15117 HEVZ 70102 LD2 Guardian ad Litem Program 900 1600 10/25/2012 11/2/2012 $ - 15118 HEVZ 70102 LD3 Guardian ad Litem Program 900 1600 12/3/2012 12/7/2012 $ - 15119 CDVZ 70100 VS1 Children & Divorce 900 1300 9/8/2012 9/8/2012 Hoyle $ 55.00 15120 CDVZ 70100 LE1 Children & Divorce 1800 2200 9/12/2012 9/12/2012 Hoyle $ 55.00 15121 CDVZ 70100 LD1 Children & Divorce 900 1300 9/14/2012 9/14/2012 Hoyle $ 55.00 15122 CDVZ 70100 LS1 Children & Divorce 900 1300 9/15/2012 9/15/2012 Hoyle $ 55.00 15124 PERZ 70202 BD1 The Wonderful World of Bldgs 1400 1600 10/12/2012 11/16/2012 Stewart $ 75.00 15125 CDVZ 70100 BD1 Children & Divorce 900 1300 9/21/2012 9/21/2012 Hoyle $ 55.00 15126 CDVZ 70100 BE2 Children & Divorce 1800 2200 9/26/2012 9/26/2012 Hoyle $ 55.00 15127 CDVZ 70100 LE2 Children & Divorce 1800 2200 10/3/2012 10/3/2012 Hoyle $ 55.00 15128 CDVZ 70100 VD1 Children & Divorce 900 1300 10/5/2012 10/5/2012 Hoyle $ 55.00 15129 CDVZ 70100 LD2 Children & Divorce 900 1300 10/13/2012 10/13/2012 Hoyle $ 55.00 15130 CDVZ 70100 BE3 Children & Divorce 1800 2200 10/10/2012 10/10/2012 Hoyle $ 55.00

46


Course Number Course Title Begin/End Time Start/End Date Instructor Course Fee 15131 CDVZ 70100 BD2 Children & Divorce 900 1300 10/12/2012 10/12/2012 Hoyle $ 55.00 15132 CDVZ 70100 LE3 Children & Divorce 1800 2200 10/17/2012 10/17/2012 Hoyle $ 55.00 15133 CDVZ 70100 BS2 Children & Divorce 900 1300 10/20/2012 10/20/2012 $ 55.00 15134 CDVZ 70100 BE4 Children & Divorce 1800 2200 10/24/2012 10/24/2012 Hoyle $ 55.00 15135 CDVZ 70100 BD3 Children & Divorce 900 1300 11/2/2012 11/2/2012 Hoyle $ 55.00 15136 CDVZ 70100 VS2 Children & Divorce 900 1300 11/3/2012 11/3/2012 Hoyle $ 55.00 15137 CDVZ 70100 LE4 Children & Divorce 1800 2200 11/7/2012 11/7/2012 Hoyle $ 55.00 15138 CDVZ 70100 LD3 Children & Divorce 900 1300 11/9/2012 11/9/2012 Hoyle $ 55.00 15139 CDVZ 70100 BE5 Children & Divorce 1800 2200 11/14/2012 11/14/2012 Hoyle $ 55.00 15140 CDVZ 70100 BD4 Children & Divorce 900 1300 11/16/2012 11/16/2012 Hoyle $ 55.00 15141 CDVZ 70100 LS2 Children & Divorce 900 1300 11/17/2012 11/17/2012 Hoyle $ 55.00 15142 CDVZ 70100 LE5 Children & Divorce 1800 2200 11/28/2012 11/28/2012 Hoyle $ 55.00 15143 CDVZ 70100 VS3 Children & Divorce 900 1300 12/1/2012 12/1/2012 Hoyle $ 55.00 15144 CDVZ 70100 LE6 Children & Divorce 1800 2200 12/5/2012 12/5/2012 Hoyle $ 55.00 15145 CDVZ 70100 BD5 Children & Divorce 900 1300 12/7/2012 12/7/2012 Hoyle $ 55.00 15146 CDVZ 70100 BE6 Children & Divorce 1800 2200 12/12/2012 12/12/2012 Hoyle $ 55.00 15147 CDVZ 70100 LD4 Children & Divorce 900 1300 12/14/2012 12/14/2012 Hoyle $ 55.00 15148 CDVZ 70100 BS3 Children & Divorce 900 1300 12/15/2012 12/15/2012 Hoyle $ 55.00 15149 ITTZ 8AB71 LD1 Absolute Beginner Computer 900 1600 9/17/2012 9/17/2012 $ 69.00 15150 ITTZ 71C71 LD1 Intro to Computers A to Z 900 1200 9/19/2012 10/5/2012 $ 179.00 15151 ITTZ 8AB71 VD1 Absolute Beginner Computer 900 1600 9/27/2012 9/27/2012 $ 69.00 15152 ITTZ 71C71 VD1 Intro to Computers A to Z 900 1200 10/2/2012 10/18/2012 $ 179.00 15153 ITTZ 73E01 LD1 Excel 2010 - Level 1 900 1600 9/24/2012 9/24/2012 $ 99.00 15154 ITTZ 72W01 LS1 Word 2010 - Level 1 930 1630 9/22/2012 9/23/2012 $ 179.00 15155 ITTZ 73E01 LS1 Excel 2010 - Level 1 930 1630 11/3/2012 11/4/2012 $ 179.00 15156 ITTZ 73E03 LS1 Excel 2010 - Level 3 930 1630 11/17/2012 11/18/2012 $ 179.00 15157 ITTZ 73E02 LD1 Excel 2010 - Level 2 900 1600 10/1/2012 10/1/2012 $ 99.00 15158 ITTZ 73E03 LD1 Excel 2010 - Level 3 900 1600 10/8/2012 10/8/2012 $ 99.00 15159 ITTZ 73E04 LD1 Excel 2010 - Level 4 900 1600 10/15/2012 10/15/2012 $ 99.00 15160 SBAZ 70177 LD1 A Cool Website That Works 1300 1500 9/21/2012 9/21/2012 $ 50.00 15161 SBAZ 70177 LD A Cool Website That Works 1300 1500 11/6/2012 11/6/2012 $ 50.00 15162 SBAZ 70154 LD Chart of Accounts Organize Biz 900 1100 9/21/2012 9/21/2012 $ 25.00 15163 SBAZ 70154 VD Chart of Accounts Organize Biz 900 1100 10/11/2012 10/11/2012 $ 25.00 15164 SBAZ 70154 LD1 Chart of Accounts Organize Biz 900 1100 11/8/2012 11/8/2012 $ 25.00 15165 SBAZ 70154 VD1 Chart of Accounts Organize Biz 900 1100 12/6/2012 12/6/2012 $ 25.00 15166 ITTZ 76Q91 LD QuickBooks 830 1700 9/24/2012 9/27/2012 $ 285.00 15167 ITTZ 76Q91 VD QuickBooks 830 1700 10/25/2012 10/29/2012 $ 285.00

47


Course Number Course Title Begin/End Time Start/End Date Instructor Course Fee 15168 ITTZ 76Q91 LD1 QuickBooks 830 1700 11/10/2012 11/17/2012 $ 285.00 15169 ITTZ 76Q91 VD2 QuickBooks 830 1700 12/10/2012 12/13/2012 $ 285.00 15170 SBAZ 70143 VD Basic Bookkeeping for Business 900 1100 10/18/2012 10/18/2012 $ 50.00 15171 SBAZ 70143 V Basic Bookkeeping for Business 900 1100 12/12/2012 12/12/2012 $ 50.00 15174 SBAZ 70184 VD Creating a Brand Customers Lov 1300 1500 9/25/2012 9/25/2012 $ 50.00 15175 HLTZ 70214 BS1 BLS Skills Assessment 900 1130 9/22/2012 9/22/2012 Komarov $ 30.00 15176 SBAZ 70184 LD Creating a Brand Customers Lov 900 1100 11/20/2012 11/20/2012 $ 50.00 15178 SBAZ 70178 LD Face It: You Need Facebook 1300 1500 10/9/2012 10/9/2012 $ 50.00 15179 SBAZ 70178 LD1 Face It: You Need Facebook 1300 1500 12/4/2012 12/4/2012 $ 50.00 15180 SBAZ 70187 LD Going Global, Intl Trade Basic 1000 1200 10/2/2012 10/2/2012 $ 10.00 15181 SBAZ 70190 LD Government Contracting 101 1300 1500 11/16/2012 11/16/2012 $ 10.00 15182 SBAZ 70167 VD Non-Profit Business Planning 900 1100 9/28/2012 9/28/2012 $ 80.00 15183 SBAZ 70167 LD Non-Profit Business Planning 900 1100 11/29/2012 11/29/2012 $ 80.00 15184 HLTZ 70214 LE1 BLS Skills Assessment 1730 1930 10/9/2012 10/9/2012 Adoryan $ 30.00 15185 SBAZ 70179 VD Marketing Your Non-Profit 900 1100 10/11/2012 10/11/2012 $ 50.00 15187 SBAZ 70179 LD Marketing Your Non-Profit 900 1100 12/5/2012 12/5/2012 $ 50.00 15188 HLTZ 70214 BE1 BLS Skills Assessment 1730 1930 11/13/2012 11/13/2012 Komarov $ 30.00 15189 HLTZ 70214 BS3 BLS Skills Assessment 900 1130 12/1/2012 12/1/2012 Komarov $ 30.00 15191 SBAZ 70180 VD Non-Profit Fundraising 900 1100 10/4/2012 10/4/2012 $ 50.00 15192 HLTZ 70214 LE2 BLS Skills Assessment 1730 1930 12/4/2012 12/4/2012 Adoryan $ 30.00 15193 SBAZ 70180 LD Non-Profit Fundraising 900 1100 12/12/2012 12/12/2012 $ 50.00 15194 SBAZ 70152 LD Social Networking for Business 900 1100 10/26/2012 10/26/2012 $ 50.00 15195 SBAZ 70152 LD1 Social Networking for Business 900 1100 12/14/2012 12/14/2012 $ 50.00 15196 SBAZ 70130 VD Steps to Starting New Business 1700 1900 9/18/2012 9/18/2012 $ 20.00 15197 SBAZ 70130 LD Steps to Starting New Business 1700 1900 10/16/2012 10/16/2012 $ 20.00 15198 SBAZ 70130 VD1 Steps to Starting New Business 1700 1900 11/13/2012 11/13/2012 $ 20.00 15199 SBAZ 70130 LD1 Steps to Starting New Business 1700 1900 12/11/2012 12/11/2012 $ 20.00 15200 SBAZ 70118 V Business Plan 900 1100 10/24/2012 10/24/2012 $ 80.00 15201 MONZ 70202 LE1 Financial Education Series 1830 2000 10/4/2012 10/25/2012 Garcia $ 65.00 15202 SBAZ 70118 LD Business Plan 1400 1600 12/6/2012 12/6/2012 $ 80.00 15203 WRTZ 70204 BD1 Writing Your Memoirs 1300 1430 10/25/2012 11/15/2012 Robertson $ 55.00 15204 SBAZ 70188 VD Understanding Financial Statem 900 1100 9/20/2012 9/20/2012 $ 50.00 15205 SBAZ 70188 LD Understanding Financial Statem 900 1100 11/8/2012 11/8/2012 $ 50.00 15206 SBAZ 70183 LD Vet Central: Things Vets Need 900 1100 10/1/2012 10/1/2012 $ 50.00 15207 DNCZ 70209 LE1 Israeli Folk Dancing 1900 2030 10/8/2012 12/3/2012 Finegold $ 95.00 15208 SBAZ 70183 VD Vet Central: Things Vets Need 900 1100 11/30/2012 11/30/2012 $ 50.00 15209 WRTZ 70213 LE1 Expressive Writing for Wellnes 1800 2000 11/5/2012 12/10/2012 Miller $ 75.00

48


Course Number Course Title Begin/End Time Start/End Date Instructor Course Fee 15210 SBAZ 70129 VD Women/Minority Certification 900 1100 10/8/2012 10/8/2012 $ 35.00 15211 SBAZ 70129 LD Women/Minority Certification 900 1100 11/5/2012 11/5/2012 $ 35.00 15212 SBAZ 70129 VD1 Women/Minority Certification 900 1100 12/3/2012 12/3/2012 $ 35.00 15213 HLTZ 70216 BE1 Vitality Now! 1800 2100 9/10/2012 9/17/2012 Zaput $ 45.00 15214 ITTZ 8MPW1 LD1 MOS Exam Prep Word 2010 900 1600 9/25/2012 9/25/2012 $ 89.00 15215 HLTZ 70216 BE2 Vitality Now! 1800 2100 10/15/2012 10/22/2012 Zaput $ 45.00 15216 HLTZ 70216 BE3 Vitality Now! 1800 2100 11/19/2012 11/26/2012 Zaput $ 45.00 15217 HLTZ 70216 BE4 Vitality Now! 1800 2100 12/3/2012 12/10/2012 Zaput $ 45.00 15218 ITTZ 8MPE1 LS1 MOS Exam Prep Excel 2010 930 1630 9/29/2012 9/29/2012 $ 89.00 15219 EXEZ 70202 LE1 Beginning Tai Chi 1800 1900 9/4/2012 10/23/2012 $ 75.00 15220 EXEZ 70202 LD1 Beginning Tai Chi 1100 1200 10/15/2012 12/10/2012 $ 75.00 15221 ITTZ 8MPP1 LD1 MOS Exam Prep PowerPoint 2010 900 1600 10/26/2012 10/26/2012 $ 89.00 15222 ITTZ 8MPO1 LD1 MOS Exam Prep Outlook 2010 900 1600 10/24/2012 10/24/2012 $ 89.00 15223 ITTZ 78DPC LS1 Digital Photography & Cameras 900 1300 10/6/2012 10/20/2012 $ 159.00 15224 ITTZ 78DPC BD1 Digital Photography & Cameras 1300 1700 11/28/2012 11/28/2012 $ 159.00 15224 ITTZ 78DPC BD1 Digital Photography & Cameras 1300 1700 11/7/2012 11/14/2012 $ 159.00 15225 ITTZ 8AB71 BD1 Absolute Beginner Computer 900 1600 10/4/2012 10/4/2012 $ 69.00 15226 ITTZ 8AB71 LE1 Absolute Beginner Computer 1900 2200 10/23/2012 10/25/2012 $ 69.00 15227 ITTZ 71C71 BD1 Intro to Computers A to Z 1300 1700 10/30/2012 10/30/2012 $ 179.00 15227 ITTZ 71C71 BD1 Intro to Computers A to Z 1300 1630 10/16/2012 10/25/2012 $ 179.00 15228 ITTZ 72W03 LS1 Word 2010 - Level 3 930 1630 10/6/2012 10/6/2012 $ 99.00 15229 ITTZ 72W04 LS1 Word 2010 - Level 4 930 1630 10/20/2012 10/20/2012 $ 99.00 15230 ITTZ 8MPW1 LS1 MOS Exam Prep Word 2010 930 1630 10/27/2012 10/27/2012 $ 89.00 15231 ITTZ 76P01 LD1 PowerPoint 2010 - Level 1 900 1600 9/21/2012 9/21/2012 $ 99.00 15232 ITTZ 76P02 LD1 PowerPoint 2010- Level 2 900 1600 10/5/2012 10/5/2012 $ 99.00 15233 ITTZ 72W01 BD1 Word 2010 - Level 1 930 1630 10/10/2012 10/10/2012 $ 99.00 15234 ITTZ 72W02 BD1 Word 2010 - Level 2 930 1630 10/17/2012 10/17/2012 $ 99.00 15235 ITTZ 72W03 BD1 Word 2010 - Level 3 930 1630 10/24/2012 10/24/2012 $ 99.00 15236 ITTZ 72W04 BD1 Word 2010 - Level 4 930 1630 10/31/2012 10/31/2012 $ 99.00 15237 ITTZ 76P03 LD1 PowerPoint 2010 - Level 3 900 1600 10/12/2012 10/12/2012 $ 99.00 15238 ITTZ 76K01 LD1 Outlook 2010 - Level 1 900 1600 10/10/2012 10/10/2012 $ 99.00 15239 ITTZ 76K02 LD1 Outlook 2010 - Level 2 900 1600 10/17/2012 10/17/2012 $ 99.00 15240 ITTZ 8AB71 VD2 Absolute Beginner Computer 1300 1600 10/19/2012 10/26/2012 $ 69.00 15241 ITTZ 71KX1 LE1 Keyboarding - Level 1 1800 2100 9/17/2012 10/10/2012 $ 149.00 15242 SPHZ 70201 BD1 Conversational Spanish 1 1500 1700 9/11/2012 11/13/2012 Avellaneda $ 115.00 15243 SPHZ 70201 BE1 Conversational Spanish 1 1900 2100 9/11/2012 11/13/2012 Avellaneda $ 115.00 15244 SPHZ 70201 BE2 Conversational Spanish 1 1700 1900 9/12/2012 11/14/2012 Avellaneda $ 115.00

49


Course Number Course Title Begin/End Time Start/End Date Instructor Course Fee 15245 SPHZ 70202 BD1 Conversational Spanish 2 1500 1700 9/10/2012 11/19/2012 Avellaneda $ 125.00 15246 SPHZ 70202 BE1 Conversational Spanish 2 1700 1900 9/11/2012 11/13/2012 Avellaneda $ 125.00 15247 SPHZ 70203 BE1 Conversational Spanish 3 1700 1900 9/10/2012 11/19/2012 Avellaneda $ 135.00 15248 SPHZ 70203 BE2 Conversational Spanish 3 1900 2100 9/12/2012 11/14/2012 Avellaneda $ 135.00 15249 SPHZ 70204 BE1 Conversational Spanish IV 1900 2100 9/10/2012 11/19/2012 Avellaneda $ 145.00 15250 SPHZ 70207 LE1 Spanish for Travelers 1700 1900 9/18/2012 11/20/2012 Antaki $ 115.00 15251 FRNZ 70207 LE1 Survival French for Travelers 1900 2100 9/18/2012 11/20/2012 Antaki $ 115.00 15252 DNCZ 70220 BE1 Uniquely Ballet 1700 1830 9/10/2012 10/15/2012 $ 75.00 15253 DNCZ 70220 BE2 Uniquely Ballet 1800 1930 9/12/2012 10/17/2012 $ 75.00 15254 DNCZ 70220 BE3 Uniquely Ballet 1700 1830 10/22/2012 12/3/2012 $ 75.00 15255 DNCZ 70220 BE4 Uniquely Ballet 1800 1930 10/24/2012 12/5/2012 $ 75.00 15256 EXEZ 70222 VD1 Zumba 1100 1200 9/5/2012 10/1/2012 $ 99.00 15257 EXEZ 70222 VD2 Zumba 1300 1400 10/3/2012 10/29/2012 $ 99.00 15258 EXEZ 70222 VD3 Zumba 1600 1700 11/2/2012 12/5/2012 $ 99.00 15259 LNGZ 70200 BE1 Beginners Italian I 1830 2030 9/18/2012 11/20/2012 Episcopo $ 115.00 15260 LNGZ 70201 LE1 Conversational Italian II 1830 2030 9/20/2012 11/29/2012 Episcopo $ 125.00 15261 SGNZ 70200 BE1 Conversational Sign Language 1830 2030 9/18/2012 11/20/2012 Halfhill $ 115.00 15262 SGNZ 70200 LE1 Conversational Sign Language 1830 2030 9/20/2012 11/29/2012 Halfhill $ 115.00 15263 DNCZ 70216 LE1 Social Ballroom Dancing 1800 2000 9/21/2012 10/19/2012 Kanozsay $ 75.00 15264 DNCZ 70216 LE2 Social Ballroom Dancing 1800 2000 11/2/2012 12/7/2012 Kanozsay $ 75.00 15265 PERZ 70203 BE1 Getting What You Want with Wor 1900 2030 9/4/2012 9/6/2012 $ 45.00 15266 PERZ 70204 LE1 Language Booster - Speaking 1730 2030 9/11/2012 9/11/2012 $ 45.00 15267 PERZ 70205 BE1 Celebrating Diversity - 1900 2030 10/2/2012 10/4/2012 $ 45.00 15268 PERZ 70206 LE1 Easy Ways to Integrate Relaxat 1900 2030 10/16/2012 10/18/2012 $ 45.00 15269 PERZ 70207 LE1 My Mess is Messing with My Lif 1730 2030 10/2/2012 10/2/2012 $ 45.00 15270 PERZ 70208 LE1 Living Well - Boosting Self-Es 1730 2030 11/13/2012 11/13/2012 $ 45.00 15271 SPTZ 70207 OD1 Adult Beginning Golf Classes 1400 1600 9/17/2012 11/7/2012 $ 189.00 15272 SPTZ 70207 OD2 Adult Beginning Golf Classes 1400 1600 9/18/2012 11/8/2012 $ 189.00 15273 SPTZ 70209 BD1 Ace Tennis for Adults 1000 1200 9/15/2012 10/13/2012 $ 75.00 15274 SPTZ 70209 BD2 Ace Tennis for Adults 1000 1200 10/20/2012 11/17/2012 $ 75.00 15275 AAHZ 70201 VD1 Slave Narratives and Their Str 1000 1200 9/6/2012 11/15/2012 $ 165.00 15276 CDAZ 70202 0 Redirecting Children Behavior 1800 2100 11/1/2012 12/6/2012 $ 195.00 15277 CDAZ 70231 LE1 High Conflict Diversion Progra 1800 2000 9/10/2012 12/3/2012 $ 35.00 15278 CDAZ 70231 VE1 High Conflict Diversion Progra 1800 2000 9/4/2012 11/20/2012 $ 35.00 15279 CDAZ 70202 LE1 Redirecting Children Behavior 2000 2130 9/10/2012 12/17/2012 $ 15.00 15280 CDAZ 70202 VE1 Redirecting Children Behavior 2000 2130 9/4/2012 12/11/2012 $ 15.00 15281 AROZ 70203 LD1 Essential Oils - The Basic 101 930 1130 9/5/2012 9/5/2012 $ 45.00

50


Course Number Course Title Begin/End Time Start/End Date Instructor Course Fee 15282 AROZ 70203 VD1 Essential Oils - The Basic 101 1300 1500 9/5/2012 9/5/2012 $ 45.00 15283 AROZ 70204 LD1 Aromatherapy/Essential Oils201 930 1130 9/25/2012 9/25/2012 $ 45.00 15284 AROZ 70204 VD1 Aromatherapy/Essential Oils201 1300 1500 9/25/2012 9/25/2012 $ 45.00 15285 AROZ 70205 LD1 Natural Pet Care with Essentia 900 1100 10/23/2012 10/23/2012 $ 45.00 15286 AROZ 70206 VD1 Respiratory Health & Essential 1300 1500 11/8/2012 11/8/2012 $ 45.00 15287 ITTZ 8AB71 LS1 Absolute Beginner Computer 930 1630 11/3/2012 11/3/2012 $ 69.00 15288 ITTZ 8AB71 BD2 Absolute Beginner Computer 1300 1600 11/6/2012 11/8/2012 $ 69.00 15289 ITTZ 8AB71 VS1 Absolute Beginner Computer 930 1630 11/17/2012 11/17/2012 $ 69.00 15290 ITTZ 8AB71 LE2 Absolute Beginner Computer 1900 2200 12/3/2012 12/5/2012 $ 69.00 15291 ITTZ 71C71 LS1 Intro to Computers A to Z 930 1630 12/1/2012 12/15/2012 $ 179.00 15292 ITTZ 71C71 VD2 Intro to Computers A to Z 1300 1700 11/16/2012 11/16/2012 $ 179.00 15292 ITTZ 71C71 VD2 Intro to Computers A to Z 1300 1630 11/2/2012 11/14/2012 $ 179.00 15293 ITTZ 71C71 BS1 Intro to Computers A to Z 930 1630 11/3/2012 11/17/2012 $ 179.00 15294 WRTZ 70201 BE1 Creative Writing I 1800 2000 11/6/2012 12/4/2012 Gordon $ 75.00 15295 WRTZ 70201 LE1 Creative Writing I 1800 2000 11/1/2012 11/29/2012 Gordon $ 75.00 15296 WRTZ 70231 LE1 You Do Have A Book in You! 2000 2130 11/1/2012 11/29/2012 Gordon $ 55.00 15297 SBAZ 70143 LD1 Basic Bookkeeping for Business 900 1100 9/20/2012 9/20/2012 $ 50.00 15298 SBAZ 70143 LD2 Basic Bookkeeping for Business 900 1100 11/1/2012 11/1/2012 $ 50.00 15300 AAHZ 70201 LE1 Slave Narratives and Their Str 1800 2000 9/6/2012 11/15/2012 $ 165.00 15301 WDSZ 7247 LD1 Grammar 900 1100 9/13/2012 9/13/2012 $ 49.00 15302 WDSZ 7454 LD1 Pre-Employmnt Testing Preparat 900 1100 10/11/2012 10/11/2012 $ 49.00 15303 WDSZ 7904 LD1 Dealing w/Difficult People 900 1100 11/15/2012 11/15/2012 $ 49.00 15304 WDSZ 7904 LD2 Dealing w/Difficult People 800 1000 10/16/2012 10/16/2012 $ 49.00 15305 HOMZ 70207 BD1 Foundations of Floral Design 1100 1300 9/5/2012 10/10/2012 Lee $ 125.00 15306 HOMZ 70208 BD1 Advanced Floral Design 1400 1600 9/5/2012 10/10/2012 Lee $ 125.00 15307 FRNZ 70200 LE1 Conversational French I 1700 1900 9/18/2012 11/20/2012 Fischhof $ 115.00 15308 FRNZ 70200 BE1 Conversational French I 1700 1900 9/19/2012 11/28/2012 Fischhof $ 115.00 15309 FRNZ 70200 VE1 Conversational French I 1700 1900 9/20/2012 11/29/2012 Fischhof $ 115.00 15310 FRNZ 70202 LE1 Conversational French II 1900 2100 9/18/2012 11/20/2012 Fischhof $ 125.00 15311 FRNZ 70202 BE1 Conversational French II 1900 2100 9/19/2012 11/28/2012 Fischhof $ 125.00 15312 FRNZ 70202 VE1 Conversational French II 1900 2100 9/20/2012 11/29/2012 Fischhof $ 125.00 15313 HOMZ 70207 BD2 Foundations of Floral Design 1100 1300 10/17/2012 12/5/2012 Lee $ 125.00 15314 HOMZ 70208 BD2 Advanced Floral Design 1400 1600 10/17/2012 12/5/2012 Lee $ 125.00 15315 ACAZ 70204 LD1 College Prep Boot Camp I 1000 1200 9/8/2012 9/15/2012 $ 45.00 15316 ACAZ 70204 VD1 College Prep Boot Camp I 1000 1200 10/6/2012 10/13/2012 $ 45.00 15317 WDSZ 7439 LD1 Body Language 800 1000 9/18/2012 9/18/2012 $ 49.00 15318 WDSZ 7280 LD1 Screening for Hiring Success 800 1000 10/2/2012 10/2/2012 $ 49.00

51


Course Number Course Title Begin/End Time Start/End Date Instructor Course Fee 15319 WDSZ 7792 LD1 Emotional Intelligence 800 1000 10/30/2012 10/30/2012 $ 49.00 15320 WDSZ 7803 LD1 Welcome to Management 830 1230 9/12/2012 9/12/2012 $ 129.00 15321 WDSZ 7804 LD1 Behavioral Interviewg & Select 830 1230 9/19/2012 9/19/2012 $ 129.00 15322 WDSZ 7805 LD1 Establsh Performnce Expectatio 830 1230 9/26/2012 9/26/2012 $ 129.00 15323 WDSZ 7806 LD1 Giving Constructive Feedback 830 1230 10/3/2012 10/3/2012 $ 129.00 15324 WDSZ 7807 LD1 The DISC-Self + Other Awarness 830 1230 10/10/2012 10/10/2012 $ 169.00 15325 WDSZ 7367 LD1 Crucial Conversations 830 1230 10/17/2012 10/17/2012 $ 129.00 15326 WDSZ 7115 LD1 Situational Leadership 830 1230 10/24/2012 10/24/2012 $ 129.00 15327 WDSZ 7808 LD1 Work with Me! 830 1230 10/31/2012 10/31/2012 $ 129.00 15328 WDSZ 7351 LD1 The 5 Dysfunctions of a Team 830 1230 11/7/2012 11/7/2012 $ 129.00 15329 WDSZ 7809 LD1 Managing Change 830 1230 11/14/2012 11/14/2012 $ 129.00 15330 WDSZ 7810 LD1 Motivating Others 830 1230 11/28/2012 11/28/2012 $ 129.00 15331 SKLZ 70201 BD1 ACT & SAT Prep 930 1200 10/6/2012 11/3/2012 $ 79.00 15332 SKLZ 70201 LD1 ACT & SAT Prep 1300 1530 10/6/2012 11/3/2012 $ 79.00 15333 ACAZ 70202 BD1 Refresher Math 1700 1900 10/8/2012 10/31/2012 $ 159.00 15334 ACAZ 70203 BD1 Reading Refresher 1400 1600 10/9/2012 11/1/2012 $ 159.00 15336 WDSZ QCBU1 LD1 QuickClass Biz Bundle $219 9/1/2012 12/31/2012 $ 239.00 15337 WDSZ 7811 LD1 Leadership Series 9/1/2012 12/31/2012 $ 999.00 15338 WDSZ 7105 LE1 Grant Writing 1800 2100 9/26/2012 10/31/2012 $ 145.00 15339 ITTZ 71C71 LE1 Intro to Computers A to Z 1800 2100 11/14/2012 11/14/2012 $ 179.00 15339 ITTZ 71C71 LE1 Intro to Computers A to Z 1800 2145 10/29/2012 11/7/2012 $ 179.00 15340 MRCZ 70100 VK Motorcycle Riding & St. Skills 700 1500 9/1/2012 9/2/2012 $ 189.00 15341 MRCZ 70100 VD Motorcycle Riding & St. Skills 700 1500 9/5/2012 9/7/2012 $ 189.00 15342 MRCZ 70100 VK1 Motorcycle Riding & St. Skills 700 1500 9/8/2012 9/9/2012 $ 189.00 15343 MRCZ 70100 VK2 Motorcycle Riding & St. Skills 700 1500 9/15/2012 9/16/2012 $ 189.00 15344 MRCZ 70100 VD1 Motorcycle Riding & St. Skills 700 1500 9/19/2012 9/21/2012 $ 189.00 15345 MRCZ 70100 VK3 Motorcycle Riding & St. Skills 700 1500 9/22/2012 9/23/2012 $ 189.00 15366 MRCZ 70151 VK First Run 700 1000 9/15/2012 9/15/2012 $ 55.00 15367 MRCZ 70104 VD Motorcycle Experienced Rider 800 1700 9/28/2012 9/28/2012 $ 110.00 15368 MRCZ 70151 VK1 First Run 700 1000 11/17/2012 11/17/2012 $ 55.00 15369 ITTZ 77ID1 LS1 iPhone App Development-Intro 900 1600 9/22/2012 10/13/2012 $ 299.00 15370 ITTZ 77ID1 LE1 iPhone App Development-Intro 1800 2100 10/23/2012 12/11/2012 $ 299.00 15371 CMPZ 70216 VD1 Season Marketing Fundamentals 900 1200 9/12/2012 9/12/2012 $ 45.00 15372 CMPZ 70217 LD1 Pinterest for Business 900 1130 9/13/2012 9/13/2012 $ 45.00 15373 CMPZ 70217 VD1 Pinterest for Business 900 1130 9/10/2012 9/10/2012 $ 45.00 15374 ITTZ 71KX1 LD1 Keyboarding - Level 1 800 1100 10/23/2012 11/15/2012 $ 149.00 15375 CMPZ 70218 LE1 Claim Your Google Places Wksp 1830 2030 9/17/2012 9/17/2012 $ 45.00

52


Course Number Course Title Begin/End Time Start/End Date Instructor Course Fee 15376 CMPZ 70218 VD1 Claim Your Google Places Wksp 900 1100 9/18/2012 9/18/2012 $ 45.00 15377 CMPZ 70219 0 Google Plus for Business 900 1100 9/19/2012 9/19/2012 $ 45.00 15378 CMPZ 70219 VE1 Google Plus for Business 1830 2030 9/20/2012 9/20/2012 $ 45.00 15379 CMPZ 70220 LD1 Social Media Wksp - Beginners 900 1600 9/29/2012 9/29/2012 $ 75.00 15380 CMPZ 70221 LD1 Social Media Wksp-Intermediate 900 1600 10/6/2012 10/6/2012 $ 75.00 15381 CMPZ 70222 VD1 Video for Marketing your Busin 900 1600 9/8/2012 9/8/2012 $ 75.00 15382 ITTZ 76P01 BE1 PowerPoint 2010 - Level 1 1900 2200 10/22/2012 10/24/2012 $ 99.00 15383 ITTZ 76P02 BE1 PowerPoint 2010- Level 2 1900 2200 11/5/2012 11/7/2012 $ 99.00 15384 ITTZ 76P03 BE1 PowerPoint 2010 - Level 3 1900 2200 11/26/2012 11/28/2012 $ 99.00 15385 HOMZ 70211 LD1 Introduction to Green Home Des 1330 1530 9/7/2012 9/21/2012 $ 85.00 15386 HOMZ 70211 LD2 Introduction to Green Home Des 1330 1530 10/5/2012 10/19/2012 $ 85.00 15387 EXEZ 70222 LD1 Zumba 1200 1300 9/15/2012 12/8/2012 $ 99.00 15388 EXEZ 70222 LE1 Zumba 1800 1900 9/13/2012 12/6/2012 $ 99.00 15389 MONZ 70244 LE1 Individual Taxation-Part 1 1800 2030 9/12/2012 12/5/2012 $ 395.00 15390 GRNZ 70114 BD1 Solar PV Install Boot Camp 800 1700 9/10/2012 9/16/2012 $ 2,995.00 15391 GRNZ 70114 LD1 Solar PV Install Boot Camp 800 1700 10/22/2012 10/28/2012 $ 2,995.00 15392 ITTZ 76K01 BD1 Outlook 2010 - Level 1 900 1200 11/6/2012 11/8/2012 $ 99.00 15393 ITTZ 76K02 BD1 Outlook 2010 - Level 2 900 1200 12/4/2012 12/6/2012 $ 99.00 15394 ITTZ 76K01 VD1 Outlook 2010 - Level 1 900 1200 9/18/2012 9/20/2012 $ 99.00 15395 ITTZ 76K02 VD1 Outlook 2010 - Level 2 900 1200 10/30/2012 11/1/2012 $ 99.00 15396 GRNZ 70113 BD1 BPI Installer 800 1700 10/1/2012 10/7/2012 $ 2,395.00 15397 GRNZ 70113 LD1 BPI Installer 800 1700 11/26/2012 12/2/2012 $ 2,395.00 15398 GRNZ 70116 BD1 BPI BA-ES Boot Camp 800 1700 9/17/2012 9/23/2012 $ 2,795.00 15399 GRNZ 70116 LD1 BPI BA-ES Boot Camp 800 1700 10/29/2012 11/4/2012 $ 2,795.00 15400 ITTZ 73E01 BD1 Excel 2010 - Level 1 1300 1600 10/9/2012 10/11/2012 $ 99.00 15401 ITTZ 73E02 BD1 Excel 2010 - Level 2 900 1200 10/23/2012 10/25/2012 $ 99.00 15402 ITTZ 73E01 VE1 Excel 2010 - Level 1 1800 2100 10/22/2012 10/24/2012 $ 99.00 15403 COKZ 70251 LD1 Garden of Eating-Healing with 1300 1430 9/13/2012 10/4/2012 $ 55.00 15404 KIDZ 70204 LD1 Kids Super Saturdays 900 1200 9/1/2012 12/15/2012 $ 30.00 15405 HOMZ 70207 LD1 Foundations of Floral Design 1200 1400 9/5/2012 10/10/2012 $ 125.00 15406 EXEZ 70222 LD2 Zumba 930 1030 9/10/2012 11/26/2012 $ 99.00 15407 EXEZ 70208 LD1 Yoga For Everyone 930 1030 9/14/2012 11/30/2012 $ 99.00 15408 HOMZ 70208 LD1 Advanced Floral Design 1230 1430 10/17/2012 11/28/2012 $ 125.00 15409 WRTZ 70204 LD1 Writing Your Memoirs 900 1200 11/15/2012 12/13/2012 $ 75.00 15410 SPHZ 70201 LD1 Conversational Spanish 1 1100 1300 9/10/2012 11/19/2012 $ 115.00 15411 SPHZ 70201 LD2 Conversational Spanish 1 930 1130 9/11/2012 11/13/2012 $ 115.00 15412 SPHZ 70201 BD2 Conversational Spanish 1 1500 1700 11/19/2012 12/17/2012 $ 115.00

53


Course Number Course Title Begin/End Time Start/End Date Instructor Course Fee 15413 SPHZ 70203 BE3 Conversational Spanish 3 1900 2100 11/19/2012 12/17/2012 $ 135.00 15414 LNGZ 70201 BE1 Conversational Italian II 1830 2030 11/19/2012 12/17/2012 $ 118.00 15415 FRNZ 70202 LE2 Conversational French II 1700 1900 11/20/2012 12/18/2012 $ 125.00 15416 SPHZ 70207 LE2 Spanish for Travelers 1900 2100 11/20/2012 12/18/2012 $ 115.00 15417 SPHZ 70202 LD1 Conversational Spanish 2 1100 1300 9/11/2012 11/13/2012 $ 125.00 15418 ARTZ 70216 LD1 ImagineThat! Mixed Media 1100 1300 9/10/2012 10/15/2012 $ 75.00 15419 CRFZ 70208 LD1 Beginners Jewelry Making 930 1130 9/12/2012 10/17/2012 $ 75.00 15420 ITTZ 73E02 VS1 Excel 2010 - Level 2 930 1630 11/10/2012 11/10/2012 $ 99.00 15421 ITTZ 73E03 VE1 Excel 2010 - Level 3 1800 2100 11/19/2012 11/26/2012 $ 99.00 15422 ITTZ 73E04 LE1 Excel 2010 - Level 4 1800 2100 12/10/2012 12/12/2012 $ 99.00 15423 WDSZ 7736 LD1 Santa's Leadership Secrets 830 1230 12/5/2012 12/5/2012 $ 129.00 15424 ITTZ 78TPT LD1 Travel Photography Tips 1300 1600 11/15/2012 11/15/2012 $ 35.00 15425 ITTZ 78TPT BS1 Travel Photography Tips 900 1200 12/1/2012 12/1/2012 $ 35.00 15426 ITTZ 72W01 VD1 Word 2010 - Level 1 1300 1600 10/30/2012 11/1/2012 $ 99.00 15427 ITTZ 72W02 VD1 Word 2010 - Level 2 1300 1600 11/13/2012 11/15/2012 $ 99.00 15429 ITTZ 72W02 LE1 Word 2010 - Level 2 1900 2200 11/27/2012 11/29/2012 $ 99.00 15430 ITTZ 72W03 LS2 Word 2010 - Level 3 930 1630 12/8/2012 12/8/2012 $ 99.00 15431 ITTZ 72W04 LE1 Word 2010 - Level 4 1900 2200 12/11/2012 12/13/2012 $ 99.00 15432 ITTZ 73EM1 LD1 Excel Macros 1400 1600 9/28/2012 9/28/2012 $ 28.00 15433 ITTZ 73EM1 BD1 Excel Macros 1000 1200 10/16/2012 10/16/2012 $ 28.00 15434 ITTZ 73EM1 LD2 Excel Macros 1500 1700 12/3/2012 12/3/2012 $ 28.00 15435 ITTZ 71MFF LD1 Managing Files-Folders 1300 1500 10/5/2012 10/5/2012 $ 28.00 15436 ITTZ 71KBS LD1 Keyboard Shortcuts 1400 1600 10/2/2012 10/2/2012 $ 28.00 15437 ITTZ 75UD1 LD1 Uploads & Downloads 1400 1600 10/19/2012 10/19/2012 $ 28.00 15438 ITTZ 71MFF BD1 Managing Files-Folders 1000 1200 11/2/2012 11/2/2012 $ 28.00 15439 ITTZ 71KBS BD1 Keyboard Shortcuts 1500 1700 11/5/2012 11/5/2012 $ 28.00 15440 ITTZ 75UD1 BD1 Uploads & Downloads 900 1100 11/27/2012 11/27/2012 $ 28.00 15441 ITTZ 71KBS LD2 Keyboard Shortcuts 1000 1200 12/7/2012 12/7/2012 $ 28.00 15442 ITTZ 8MPE1 LD1 MOS Exam Prep Excel 2010 900 1600 10/29/2012 10/29/2012 $ 89.00 15443 ITTZ 8MPE1 LS2 MOS Exam Prep Excel 2010 930 1630 12/1/2012 12/1/2012 $ 89.00 15444 ITTZ 8MPW1 LD2 MOS Exam Prep Word 2010 930 1630 11/9/2012 11/9/2012 $ 89.00 15445 ITTZ 8MPP1 LS1 MOS Exam Prep PowerPoint 2010 930 1630 12/15/2012 12/15/2012 $ 89.00 15446 ITTZ 8MPO1 LD2 MOS Exam Prep Outlook 2010 900 1200 11/27/2012 11/29/2012 $ 89.00 15447 ITTZ 75WW1 LD1 Writing for the Web 900 1200 10/12/2012 10/12/2012 $ 59.00 15448 ITTZ 75WW1 BD1 Writing for the Web 1300 1600 11/20/2012 11/20/2012 $ 59.00 15449 ITTZ 75WW1 LE1 Writing for the Web 1800 2100 12/12/2012 12/12/2012 $ 59.00 15450 HLTZ 70215 LD1 Trauma Nurse Core Crs(TNCC) 900 1700 11/6/2012 11/7/2012 $ 325.00

54


Course Number Course Title Begin/End Time Start/End Date Instructor Course Fee 15451 MOWZ 70211 LE1 Certified Bookkeeper Course 1800 2100 9/18/2012 12/13/2012 $ 1,175.00 15455 AAHZ 70201 VD2 Slave Narratives and Their Str 1000 1200 9/6/2012 9/13/2012 $ 35.00 15456 AAHZ 70201 LE2 Slave Narratives and Their Str 1800 2000 9/6/2012 9/13/2012 $ 35.00 15457 AAHZ 70201 VD3 Slave Narratives and Their Str 1000 1200 9/27/2012 10/11/2012 $ 55.00 15458 AAHZ 70201 LE3 Slave Narratives and Their Str 1800 2000 9/27/2012 10/11/2012 $ 55.00 15459 AAHZ 70201 VD4 Slave Narratives and Their Str 1000 1200 10/17/2012 10/24/2012 $ 35.00 15460 AAHZ 70201 LE4 Slave Narratives and Their Str 1800 2000 10/17/2012 10/24/2012 $ 35.00 15461 AAHZ 70201 VD5 Slave Narratives and Their Str 1000 1200 10/31/2012 11/15/2012 $ 65.00 15462 AAHZ 70201 LE5 Slave Narratives and Their Str 1800 2000 10/31/2012 11/15/2012 $ 65.00 15463 ITTZ 77IGS LD1 iPad - Getting Started 1130 1300 12/12/2012 12/12/2012 $ 19.00 15464 EXEZ 70208 VD1 Yoga For Everyone 930 1030 9/15/2012 12/1/2012 $ 99.00 15465 SPHZ 70201 VD1 Conversational Spanish 1 900 1100 9/17/2012 10/17/2012 $ 115.00 15466 HLTZ 70157 LE1 Certified Pharm Tech Course 1800 2100 3/6/2013 3/6/2013 $ 2,195.00 15466 HLTZ 70157 LE1 Certified Pharm Tech Course 900 1700 1/22/2013 3/5/2013 $ 2,195.00 15466 HLTZ 70157 LE1 Certified Pharm Tech Course 1800 2100 9/17/2012 1/21/2013 $ 2,195.00 15467 SPHZ 70202 VD1 Conversational Spanish 2 900 1100 10/22/2012 11/28/2012 $ 125.00 15468 SJDZ 70100 BD1 Security Officer-24hr 800 1700 9/14/2012 9/16/2012 $ 210.00 15469 SJDZ 70100 BD2 Security Officer-24hr 800 1700 10/12/2012 10/14/2012 $ 210.00 15470 SJDZ 70101 BW1 Security Officer-16hr 800 1700 9/29/2012 9/30/2012 $ 140.00 15471 SJDZ 70101 BW2 Security Officer-16hr 800 1700 10/27/2012 10/28/2012 $ 140.00 15472 WDGZ 70201 LE1 Wedding&Event Planning Certif 1800 2200 9/24/2012 11/12/2012 $ 995.00 15473 ITTZ 72W01 LE1 Word 2010 - Level 1 1900 2200 11/13/2012 11/15/2012 $ 99.00 15474 GRNZ 70115 BD1 LEED Green Associate 800 1700 12/3/2012 12/4/2012 $ 595.00 15477 MRCZ 70100 0 Motorcycle Riding & St. Skills 1800 2359 9/14/2012 9/15/2012 $ 199.00 15478 MRCZ 70100 BE1 Motorcycle Riding & St. Skills 1800 2359 10/12/2012 10/13/2012 $ 199.00 15479 MRCZ 70100 BE3 Motorcycle Riding & St. Skills 1800 2359 11/9/2012 11/10/2012 $ 199.00 15480 SJDZ 70122 LD1 Private Investigator Full Crse 800 1700 10/1/2012 10/5/2012 Chambers $ 400.00 15481 SJDZ 70122 BD1 Private Investigator Full Crse 800 1700 11/26/2012 11/30/2012 Chambers $ 400.00 15482 HLTZ 70104 BE6 BLS for Health Care Providers 1730 2200 9/11/2012 9/11/2012 Komarov $ 65.00 15483 HLTZ 70104 LE1 BLS for Health Care Providers 1753 2200 9/18/2012 9/18/2012 Adoryan $ 65.00 15485 HLTZ 70104 BW2 BLS for Health Care Providers 900 1330 10/20/2012 10/20/2012 Komarov $ 65.00 15486 HLTZ 70104 BE7 BLS for Health Care Providers 1730 2200 12/4/2012 12/4/2012 Komarov $ 65.00 15487 LHVZ 70119 W CE SR Suit-Annuity&Life Trans 9/1/2012 12/31/2012 $ 25.00 15490 ACAZ 70202 BE1 Refresher Math 1700 1900 10/15/2012 11/19/2012 $ 159.00 15491 HLTZ 70159 BD1 Phlebotomy Certificate Program 800 1700 9/20/2012 9/23/2012 $ 1,495.00 15493 ITTZ 76Q91 VD1 QuickBooks 830 1700 9/10/2012 9/13/2012 $ 285.00 15494 SBAZ 70154 VD2 Chart of Accounts Organize Biz 900 1100 9/5/2012 9/5/2012 Griffin $ 25.00

55

State College of Florida Manatee - Sarasota

Human Resources Office Personnel Actions Board Exhibits: August 29, 2012

Appointments Professional Faculty Tech/Paraprofessional Career

Changes Administrator Professional Faculty Tech/Paraprofessional Career

Separations Administrator Professional Tech/Paraprofessional Career

Retirements Administrator Tech/Paraprofessional Career

Deceased Career

56

hugginn

Typewritten Text

EXHIBIT G

Personnel Actions Board Exhibits August 29, 2012

Name Effective Date Classification Classification Title Department Site

AppointmentsAlmeyda, Angela 7/9/2012 Professional Guidance Counselor Collegiate School BradentonBashford, Jacqueline 7/9/2012 Career Assistant, Educational Records Educaional Records VeniceGroves, Michelle 7/30/2012 Tech/Paraprofessional Advisor II, Career Resource Center Career Resource Center BradentonStenshoel, Toni 7/30/2012 Professional Assistant Bursar Cashiering BradentonCiosici, Stefan 8/8/2012 Faculty Instructor Collegiate School BradentonSepesy, Ashley 8/8/2012 Faculty Instructor Collegiate School BradentonLacey, Lisa 8/8/2012 Faculty Instructor Collegiate School BradentonOlson, Kristin 8/8/2012 Faculty Instructor Collegiate School BradentonMcNeal, LaTonja 8/8/2012 Faculty Instructor Collegiate School BradentonWarrick, Erick 8/16/2012 Faculty Instructor Natural Science BradentonBockheim, Elizabeth 8/16/2012 Faculty Professor Nursing BradentonWeintrab, Michelle 8/16/2012 Tech/Paraprofessional Lab Instructor ARC BradentonWright, Melanie 8/16/2012 Faculty Professor Natural Science VeniceBowman, Alison 8/16/2012 Professional Coordinator, Benefits Human Resources BradentonWallace, Melanie 8/16/2012 Career Staff Assistant III Human Resources Bradenton

ChangesHindenlang, Beverly 7/1/2012 From: Faculty BSN 9 Month Faculty BSN Nursing Bradenton

To: Administrator Dean, Nursing Programs Nursing Bradenton

Hill II, Timothy 7/1/2012 From: Tech/Paraprofessional Advisor II, Student Life Advising BradentonTo: Professional Admin Projects Specialist Student Sservices Bradenton

Sharples, Stacey 7/1/2012 From: Professional Coordinator, Outreach/College Success Outreach/College Success BradentonTo: Administrator Director, Admissions Admissions Bradenton

Gould, Alicia 7/1/2012 From: Career Specialist, Outreach Services Outreach/College Success BradentonTo: Professional Coordinator, Early College Outreach/College Success Bradenton

Gigliotti, Maria 7/1/2012 From: Professional Specialist, Web Development Information Technology Services BradentonTo: Professional Web Developer Information Technology Services Bradenton

57

Personnel Actions Board Exhibits August 29, 2012

Sharrio, Christine 7/9/2012 From: Career Specialist, Learning Mgmt. Systems Information Technology Services BradentonTo: Professional Specialist, Instructional Design - Baccalaureate Baccalaureate Programs Bradenton

Jones, Arthur 8/6/2012 From: Career Staff Assistant III Human Resources BradentonTo: Tech/Paraprofessional Specialist, Help Desk Information Technology Services Bradenton

Solana, Delane 8/6/2012 From: Career Academic Secretary - Nursing Nursing BradentonTo: Career Placement Specialist Career Resource Center Bradenton

Johnson, Herschel 8/6/2012 From: Tech/Paraprofessional Advisor II, Student Development Student Development BradentonTo: Professional Coordinator, Student Life Student Services Bradenton

SeparationsVarnum Jr., David 7/9/2012 Professional Manager, Network Services Information Technology Services BradentonEmerton, Roland 7/17/2012 Administrator Director of Development, Foundation SCF Foundation BradentonOttaviano, Joseph 8/3/2012 Professional System Administrator, Network Information Technology Services BradentonSmith, Lori 8/6/2012 Tech/Paraprofessional Specialist, Health Professions Nursing BradentonLobb, Kathleen 8/17/2012 Career Bookstore Assistant SCF Store BradentonHarvey, Bonnie 8/17/2012 Tech/Paraprofessional Lab Manager - Nursing Lakewood Ranch

RetirementsPhillips, Idelia 7/2/2012 Administrator Director, Career & Tech Education Career & Tech Education Lakewood RanchSmith, Elaine 7/27/2012 Career Placement Specialist Career Resource Center BradentonKenney, Wanda 8/13/2012 Tech/Paraprofessional Advisor II, Career Resource Center Career Resource CenterPlatone, Lynda 8/31/2012 Tech/Paraprofessional Advisor II, Vet Benefits - Financial Aid Student Services BradentonHassell, Susan 9/1/2012 Career Specialist, Public Safety Public Safety Bradenton

DeceasedBogol, Andrew 7/9/2012 Career Specialist, Auditorium Support Theatre Bradenton

58

StateCollegeofFloridaCollegiateSchoolBoardofTrusteesReport‐August2012SCFCSreceivedFCATscoreswhileonsummerbreakandmaintainedits“A”gradefromFLDOE.Theschoolgradeiscomposedofthefollowingcriteria:performancebyallgradesontheFCATinreadingandmath,aswellasscienceandwritingforthe8thgrade.Alsoincludedinthescoreisthesuccessofaccelerated8thgraderswhocompletedtheEndofCourseexamforAlgebra.Wearegradedonnotjusttheperformanceofthestudentsonthetestsforthatyear,butalsotheacademicgrowthofthestudentsfromlastyear.Weareveryproudofourstudentsfortheircommitmenttodotheirbest,aswellasourteacherswhoensuredthattheirstudentswereprepared.ManateeCountySchoolBoardTestAdministrationandDataManagementdepartmentcreatedthefollowingdatatablesutilizingSCFCSFCATdatasets.ThefirstchartsillustratethereadinglevelsinbothreadingandmathbyFCATscore(1‐5)andgrade,blueis6th,redis7th,andgreenis8thgrade.Ascoreof3ispassing.

59

hugginn

Typewritten Text

EXHIBIT H

Thefollowingchartsillustratethepercentofstudentsperformingateachreadingandmathlevel,bytheschoolsub‐groupscomposedfromracialandethnicbackgrounddata.Reading:

Math:

60

PreparationforAugust20opening:TheadministrationandfacultyhavebeenverybusythisAugustpreparingfortheincoming11thgraders,aswellasournew6thgradeclassandothernewstudents.TheCollegiateSchoolinstructorsreturnedtocampusaheadofthestudentssothattheycanpreparetheircourses,andalsotoattendin‐houseprofessionaldevelopment.Thefocusincludedanupdateofthetechnology,andhowtoutilizeittothefullestadvantageintheircourses.Teachersalsospenttimeorganizingtheacademiccoachinghoursothatthestudentswouldbemorealignedschoolwideintheirinstruction.Thecoachinghourisveryimportantasthecurriculumhelpsstudentswithskillstheyneedforacademicsuccess(timemanagement,studyskills)andsolidifiestheexpectationsandidentityoftheCollegiateSchool.SCFCSenrollmentisessentiallyfull.Ourcapacityis330studentsthisyearwith59enrolledas11thgraders,asofAug.22.These11thgradersareconsideredpartoftheacceleratedcollegeplan,andattendclassfulltimeonthecampus.Mostnewseatswereavailableinthe11thgrade,6thgradeandthenthe9thgradecountalsowentupinresponsetothelargerclasssize(25/classasopposedto22in6‐8).Afewseatswereavailableingrades7,8and9.MostrecentSCFCSStatistics:Forgrades6‐9:56%ofthestudentsareFirstGenerationcollege‐going,definedasneitherparentcompletingaBA.

5%

11%

20%

0%0%

64%

Asian/Pacific I Black Hispanic Amer Ind/Alaskan Hawaiian/PC White

61

43%

57%

Male Female

62

63

hugginn

Typewritten Text

EXHIBIT I

Memorandum of Understanding — School Tutoring Program

District Board of Trustees of State College of Florida, Manatee-Sarasota and School Board of Manatee County, Florida for

Bayshore Elementary School

This Memorandum of Understanding (“Agreement”) forms the agreement between the District Board of Trustees of State College of Florida, Manatee-Sarasota (“SCF”) and the School Board of Manatee County, Florida (“District”) to provide student tutoring services for the students of Bayshore Elementary School (“BAYSHORE”). To provide this program opportunity, SCF and District hereby enter into this Agreement:

I. General Provisions of Agreement: The parties agree to cooperate to offer students of BAYSHORE tutoring services at BAYSHORE’s Bradenton Campus in conjunction with the provisions of SCF’s Work Study Program.

II. Responsibilities of District:

A. District will make all parents and students of BAYSHORE aware of the tutoring

services and SCF’s desire to partner with District and BAYSHORE to allow paid SCF students the opportunity to offer tutoring services.

B. District will make available to all students and parents of students at BAYSHORE pre-approved printed material from BAYSHORE explaining their program offerings and facility resources.

C. District will endeavor to promote the benefits of BAYSHORE’s programs through its

marketing efforts and at all BAYSHORE student/parent orientation sessions.

D. BAYSHORE’s principal along with other BAYSHORE leadership shall meet with SCF administrators, on a monthly basis, to assess progress of offered programs and to address issues common to all parties.

E. District will coordinate with SCF to ensure that program costs do not become a barrier

to BAYSHORE student participation.

F. District shall perform level II fingerprint and background checks on all SCF submitted student tutors. These costs are to be borne by District. BAYSHORE shall provide supervision of all students and tutors at all times on BAYSHORE property.

G. District agrees to notify SCF within twenty-four (24) hours of any incident that may possibly lead to a claim or cause of action against any party to this Agreement.

H. District will notify SCF’s appropriate personnel of any student who is requested to

cease participation in BAYSHORE’s activities as a result of unacceptable background

66

hugginn

Typewritten Text

EXHIBIT J

check or inappropriate student action or actions not in keeping with District’s rules and regulations.

III. Responsibilities of SCF:

A. SCF shall academically screen and qualify appropriate College student candidates to

assist in the BAYSHORE student tutoring program.

B. SCF agrees to adhere to District rules and regulations concerning student conduct, student safety, and emergency practices procedures. SCF shall require similar agreement of SCF students as a condition of participation in the program. A copy of such rules and procedures will be given to SCF’s administration prior to the commencement of the program.

C. SCF agrees that all District students will be tutored on BAYSHORE property. SCF will

inform all SCF students that no BAYSHORE students be taken off of BAYSHORE property by SCF or SCF students.

IV. Term and Termination:

This Agreement shall begin on August__, 2012 and continue for one (1) year terminating on __________, 2013, but may be terminated sooner upon the happening of any of the following events: A. This Agreement may be terminated by either party, in its sole discretion, upon thirty

(30) days’ written notice. In addition, this Agreement may be terminated at any time by either party in the event of a material breach by the other, provided, however, that if the alleged breach is reasonably capable of correction within a period of ten (10) business days, no termination shall be effective until written notice shall have been given to the party who is alleged to be in breach of this Agreement. If the alleged breach has not been corrected within ten (10) business days, the non-breaching party may then terminate this Agreement, effective immediately.

B. This Agreement is at all times dependent upon the continued operation of BAYSHORE. Any loss of funding or final termination of SCF’s work study program by either the Florida Department of Education or by the US Department of Education shall immediately terminate this Agreement.

C. To the extent then permitted by law, this Agreement shall be terminated immediately if either party shall make any assignment for the benefit of creditors, or shall file any petition under the Bankruptcy Act for reorganization, or file a voluntary petition of bankruptcy, or be adjudicated bankrupt or insolvent, or if any receiver is appointed for its business or property, or if any trustee in bankruptcy or insolvency shall be appointed under the laws of the United States or of the several states.

V. Insurance and Indemnification:

A. General Liability: Both parties to this Agreement are institutions of the State of Florida,

and their “self-insurance” limitations are provided for by law. District and SCF are provided with comprehensive general liability insurance with the limits of Two Hundred Thousand Dollars and Zero Cents ($200,000.00) per person, Three Hundred

67

Thousand Dollars and Zero Cents ($300,000.00) per occurrence, pursuant to the terms and limitations of Florida Statutes, Section 768.28 and Florida Statutes, Chapter 284, Part II.

B. Worker’s Compensation & Employers Liability: Both District and SCF are covered by their respective State of Florida workers compensation programs. Both parties to this agreement agree that at no time shall the employees of District be considered employees of SCF and that SCF employees shall not be considered to be employees of District.

C. Professional Educators Errors & Omissions Liability: Both District and SCF agree to maintain policies of insurance covering the errors and omissions of their respective professional staff with limits of at least One Million Dollars ($1,000,000) per person and Three Million Dollars ($3,000,000) per occurrence.

D. Indemnification: To the extent permitted by Section 768.28, Florida Statutes, each

party shall indemnify and hold harmless the other from and against any claims, liability, demands, expenses, proceedings, legal actions, attorneys’ fees, court costs, and other fees arising from and out of the negligence of its respective officers, faculty, staff and employees, or agents or their successors and assigns. Nothing contained in the foregoing shall be construed as a waiver of either party’s Sovereign Immunity under Federal or Florida Law.

VI. Notices:

Any communications to be given hereunder by any party to the other parties, unless otherwise provided for, must be in writing and may be effected either by personal delivery or by United States certified mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, at the following addresses: District Board of Trustees of State College of Florida, Manatee-Sarasota Attention: Timothy G. Langenback, Director of Business Services & Public Safety P.O. Box 1849 Bradenton, FL 34206 School Board of Manatee County Attention: Annette K. Codelia, Principal 6120 26th Street West Bradenton, FL 34207

VII. Miscellaneous.

A. Any number of counterparts of this Agreement may be signed and delivered, each of which shall be considered an original and all of which, together, shall constitute one and the same instrument.

B. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida.

68

C. No change, modification, termination or attempted waiver of any of the provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon any party hereto unless reduced to writing and signed by the party or parties against whom enforcement is sought.

D. All understandings and agreements between the parties concerning the subject matter

hereof are contained herein and the parties acknowledge that no representations or warranties have been made other than those specifically set forth herein.

E. This Agreement is not assignable unless all parties to this Agreement approve of the

assignment. F. If any litigation shall be instituted for the purpose of enforcing or interpreting any of the

provisions of this Agreement, the prevailing party or parties, as determined by the court having jurisdiction thereof, shall be entitled to recover, in addition to all other relief, an amount equal to all costs and expenses incurred in connection therewith, including, without limitation, reasonable legal expenses (including but not limited to fees for services of attorneys, paralegals and legal assistants) at the trial level and in connection with all appellate proceedings.

G. All parties represent that they are duly organized, validly existing and in good standing

under the laws of the State of Florida and have full capacity, power and authority to convey and execute this Agreement and to otherwise comply with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

H. The title and captions of paragraphs and subparagraphs contained in this Agreement

are provided for convenience of reference only, and they shall not be considered a part of this Agreement for purposes of interpreting or applying this Agreement; such titles or captions are not intended to define, limit, extend, explain, or describe the scope or extent of this Agreement or any of its terms, provisions, representations, warranties, or conditions in any manner or way whatsoever.

J. All pronouns and variations thereof shall be deemed to refer to the masculine,

feminine, or neuter, and the singular or plural, as the identity of the person or entity of the persons or entities may require.

Signatures: DISTRICT BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF STATE COLLEGE OF FLORIDA, MANATEE-SARASOTA By: ________________________________ ____________________________ Print Name: Date SCHOOL BOARD OF MANATEE COUNTY, FLORIDA By: ________________________________ _____________________________ Print Name: ANNETTE CODELIA Date Principal

69

By: ________________________________ _____________________________ Print Name: JOSEPH STOKES Date Director of Elementary Education APPROVED AS TO FORM AND SUFFICIENCY: By: ________________________________ _____________________________ Print Name: JOHN W. BOWEN Date School Board Attorney

70

71

hugginn

Typewritten Text

EXHIBIT K

Revised: August 23, 2012

EARLY COLLEGE PROGRAM MANUAL &

ARTICULATION AGREEMENT

MANATEE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD &

STATE COLLEGE OF FLORIDA, MANATEE-SARASOTA

2012-2013

Early College Program

Dual Enrollment

Early Admission

College Enrichment

86

2

INTRODUCTION

The Dual Enrollment Program is authorized under Florida Statutes 1007.235 and 1007.271. This program is a cooperative effort between Manatee County School Board and State College of Florida, Manatee-Sarasota, and is designed to provide accelerated learning mechanisms for qualified high school students on an individual basis. The Florida Legislature has defined a variety of options intended to shorten the time necessary to complete the requirements of a high school diploma, postsecondary certificate or degree and broaden the scope of curricular options available for secondary students. Through dual enrollment public and home education secondary students may enroll in postsecondary courses creditable toward both high school graduation and a career certificate or an associate or baccalaureate degree. There are three curricular avenues for students to participate in early college: dual enrollment (college credit), career dual enrollment and early admission. Dual enrollment refers to academic or college credit coursework at the postsecondary level that leads to a college credit certificate or degree. Early college dual enrollment is available through community colleges and universities. Early Admission is a form of dual enrollment through which eligible secondary students enroll in a postsecondary institution on a full-time basis in courses that are creditable toward the high school diploma and the associate or baccalaureate degree. The Dual Enrollment [DE] and the Early Admission [EA] programs provide for eligible secondary school students to earn high school and college credits simultaneously provided that all statutory, district, and institutional requirements are met. Students in these programs enroll concurrently in high school and the State College of Florida, Manatee-Sarasota courses. College-level academic and/or career-technical courses may be offered on either the high school or the college campuses. Through this formal inter-institutional agreement, the school district accepts college level courses that fulfill high school graduation requirements. After high school graduation, these credits can also be used for degree and certificate programs at SCF and other regionally accredited colleges universities, and technical education centers. Costs associated with tuition for DE/EA courses are waived. Manatee County School Board is responsible for purchasing or providing required textbooks for students enrolled in DE/EA courses. Students enrolled in these programs can also participate in both the academic and extracurricular student functions of the college and have full library privileges. The district encourages students to seek opportunities for academic enhancement, and upon completion of DE/EA courses, the students can submit transcripts from SCF that may be used for other college admissions. The purpose of this manual is to define the acceleration opportunities available between Manatee County School Board and State College of Florida, Manatee-Sarasota [SCF] and to specify the details of the day-to-day operations of College Dual Enrollment (DE) and Early Admission (EA).

87

3

TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 2

Early College Deadlines………………………………………………………………….5 Qualifying Test Scores.......................................................................................................6

Dual Enrollment Textbook Procedures…………………………………………………7 Eligibility Criteria and Academic Procedures for College Dual Enrollment (DE) ..... 9 On a High School Campus ......................................................................................... 9 Qualifications .......................................................................................................... 9 Academic Impact .................................................................................................... 9 Costs ........................................................................................................................ 9 Student Responsibilities .......................................................................................... 9 Counselor Responsibilities ................................................................................... 10 Instructor Responsibilities .................................................................................... 10

On an SCF Campus .................................................................................................. 11 Qualifications ........................................................................................................ 11 Academic Impact…………………………………………………………………11 Costs……………………………………………………………………………...11 Student Responsibilities……..……………………………………………………11 Counselor Responsibilities………………………………………………………..12

Early Admission to College ............................................................................................ 13 Qualifications ........................................................................................................ 13 Academic Impact .................................................................................................. 13 Costs ...................................................................................................................... 13 Procedures ............................................................................................................. 13 Student Responsibilities ........................................................................................ 14 Counselor Responsibilities ................................................................................... 14

Special Notes on Registration Procedures .................................................................... 15

Academic Procedures for College Enrichment ............................................................ 16 Qualifications ........................................................................................................ 16 Academic Impact .................................................................................................. 16 Costs ...................................................................................................................... 16 Student Responsibilities ........................................................................................ 16 Counselor Responsibilities ................................................................................... 16 Student Information ....................................................................................................... 17 Instructional Materials for Acceleration and Enrichment Students ...................... 17

Campus Resources ................................................................................................ 17 Parking Decals ...................................................................................................... 17

SCF Student ID ..................................................................................................... 17 Maximum Age Policy………………………………………………………… ... 17 Requests for Accommodations………………………………………………… . 17 Early College Academic Policy ............................................................................ 17

88

4

Maximum Enrollment Policy ................................................................................ 18 Repeat Policy…………………………………………………………………. . ..18 Flex Start Class Policy…………………………………………………………. . 18 Withdraw Policy ................................................................................................... 18

Grading Policy ...................................................................................................... 19 Transcripts............................................................................................................. 19 Code of Conduct……………………………………………………………….. . 19 Collegiate Environment……………………………………………………… .... 20 Future Impact………………………………………………………………… .... 20

Faculty Certification ....................................................................................................... 21

Classroom Management ................................................................................................. 22 Syllabi, Handouts and Exams ............................................................................... 22 Attendance Policy ................................................................................................. 22 Academic Misconduct .......................................................................................... 23 Plagiarism Policy .................................................................................................. 23 Copyright Law ...................................................................................................... 23 Student Rights ....................................................................................................... 23 Statement of Nondiscrimination ........................................................................... 23 Final Exams .......................................................................................................... 23 Instructor Evaluation ............................................................................................. 24 Grading Policy ...................................................................................................... 24 Final Grades .......................................................................................................... 24 Dual Enrollment Course Recommendations ......................................................... 25 Instructional Materials .......................................................................................... 25

Instructional Materials for Dual Enrollment Courses at the High School .......... . 25 SCF Department Chair Contact Information………………………………… .... 25 Requests for Dual Enrollment Courses on the High School Site ................................ 26

Administrative Policies and Procedures ....................................................................... 27 Assurance of Transfer and Credit Policies ............................................................ 27 Career Pathways .................................................................................................... 27 Assurance of High School Credit ......................................................................... 27 Procedure to Inform Students and Parents ............................................................ 27 Excess Hours and Acceleration Mechanisms ....................................................... 27 Relationship of Responsibilities ........................................................................... 27 College Credit Dual Enrollment Rule………………………………………….. . 28

Restricted SCF DE Course List.................................................................................... . 29 Appendices Appendix A: Dual Enrollment Course Equivalency ............................................ 30 Appendix B: Calculating Course Credit Equivalence ........................................ 31 Appendix C: Contract for Dual Enrollment and Early Admissions .................... 32 Addendums Addendum 1: Bayshore High School College Center……………………… ..... .33 Articulation Agreement .................................................................................................. 41

89

5

SCF EARLY COLLEGE DEADLINES

2012-2013

Enrollment deadlines include Application for Early College submission, placement testing on an SCF campus, and Early College Approval Form submission. All required materials must be

submitted to SCF by these published deadlines or students will be ineligible to participate in the dual enrollment / early college programs.

Spring 2013 Deadline—December 3, 2012

Summer 2013 Deadline—April 15, 2013

Fall 2013 Deadline—June 17, 2013

*no exceptions will be made after these published deadlines

90

6

Early College Qualifying Test Scores

It is the understanding of the State College of Florida, Manatee-Sarasota, that all PERT testing for college readiness will be conducted by the high school per F.S. 1108.30, Rule 6A-10.0315.

SCF will continue to test eligible high school students for dual enrollment/early college

purposes.

College Level English ACT: 17+ (and Reading 18+) PERT: 99+ FCAT: 355+ SAT: 440+ on Verbal/Critical Reading College Level Math ACT: 20+ PERT: 123+ FCAT: 375+ SAT: 510+ *Please note math scores above meet the minimum college-level math requirement—higher scores are required for upper level math courses College Level Reading Required for all courses excluding Math ACT: 18+ PERT: 104+ FCAT: 355+ SAT: 440+ on Critical Reading SCF Placement Test (PERT) Retake Policy Dual Enrollment students may take the SCF Placement Test only one time per term not to exceed a maximum of two attempts per calendar year. SCF Test Score Acceptance Policy SCF accepts SAT, ACT, and PERT test scores for dual enrollment eligibility. Test score reports must have the student’s full name (first and last), test date, and test score results in order to be accepted. Test score reports are accepted via e-mail, mail, fax, or hand delivery for processing.

91

7

Dual Enrollment Textbook Procedure Students taking Courses at SCF

1. Course Approval

a. Students must complete a current SCF Dual Enrollment form, obtain the required

signatures, and take any applicable assessments.

b. The specific course title must be indicated (stating “elective” as a course choice is not specific).

c. Students will take the Dual Enrollment form to SCF and enroll in classes.

d. Once enrolled, students will print out the corresponding textbook list from the SCF Bookstore webpage:

http://www.bookstore.scf.edu/bradenton/SelectTermDept.aspx

2. Acquiring Textbooks

a. When the student provides his/her high school with the list of required textbook(s), the school will issue the textbooks to the student.

b. If the high school does not have the textbook(s), the student will obtain the completed Textbook Voucher from the Guidance counselor using the printed SCF website list supplied by the student. The voucher must have any blank lines marked through. The student will then go to the SCF bookstore and obtain the necessary materials.

c. The SCF Bookstore Manager will complete the Reimbursement Request Form and send

that form and the completed Dual Enrollment Approval Form to Mr. Steve Neumann, 2501 63rd Avenue East, Bradenton, FL 34203. Mr. Neumann will make arrangements to pay for the textbook.

d. Manatee District Schools will not pay for or purchase supplemental materials for dual

enrollment courses.

e. The District will not reimburse a student or parent for any materials that they purchase directly from SCF with their own money.

f. The District will not pay for any materials that are not on the required list unless prior

arrangements have been made with the Instructional Materials Office.

g. All materials purchased by the School District of Manatee County remain the property of the District. The student may not highlight or write in the book.

h. The student does have the option of purchasing the textbook from the School District. The student would pay no more than the cost of the textbook through the SCF Bookstore. If interested, the student would contact the high school bookkeeper to make arrangement to pay for the materials.

3. Textbook Return

a. Whether received from the SCF Bookstore or from Manatee District Schools, the

student is responsible for returning the book at the end of the course in good usable

92

8

condition to his/her high school.

b. The student may not highlight or write in the book. If the textbook is not returned in usable condition, the student will be fined the cost of the textbook. The student may be excluded from graduation or other activities if textbook fees are not paid.

c. If the student withdraws from the course, the student is responsible for returning the

textbook at the time of withdrawal from the course.

d. Packaging must not be removed from texts received from the SCF book store if the student intends to participate in the add/drop during the first week that school is in

session. Once the packaging is opened, the books cannot be returned to the bookstore for credit. Students must bring the credit to their high school in order to be issued new textbooks.

I have read and understand the above procedures for obtaining and returning Dual Enrollment Materials to the School District of Manatee County. _______________________________________ _____________________________________ Student Name (Print) Student Signature _______________________________________ _____________________________________ High School Date The District Instructional Materials Office will pay the SCF Bookstore for required materials only. Manatee District Schools will not pay for or purchase supplemental materials for dual enrollment courses. Contacts: Linda Guilfoyle, Director of Curriculum, 751-6550 Ext. 2100 Steve Neumann, District Instructional Materials Manager, 751-6550 Ext. 2204

93

9

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA AND ACADEMIC PROCEDURES FOR COLLEGE DUAL ENROLLMENT (DE)

COLLEGE DUAL ENROLLMENT ON THE HIGH SCHOOL CAMPUS [1007.27 (5)F.S.] High school students must meet the following minimum requirements:

1. Have an unweighted 3.0.cumulative grade point average (GPA). 2. Achieve a qualifying score on the SAT, ACT, or PERT by the published deadlines.

Test scores are valid for 2 years from the date of testing. 3. Must maintain a high school GPA of 3.0 (unweighted) to remain eligible for the College

Dual Enrollment and Early Admission Accelerated Programs.

4. Must earn a “C” or better in all attempted dual enrollment classes in order to remain eligible for the program.

5. Must meet all Early College published deadlines.

6. Must satisfy any course prerequisites as required by the current SCF catalog.

Academic Impact The dual enrollment student receives both high school and college credit upon successful completion of the course(s). For the high school academic record, DE courses are weighted the same as IB, AP and Honors courses. Since college credit is awarded, this grade will remain a part of the college academic transcript as well as the high school academic transcript. Costs Students enrolled in the Dual Enrollment [DE] and Early Admission [EA] Programs are exempt from the payment of lab fees and required textbooks. Students are responsible for paying for all supplemental and/or recommended materials in each of these programs. Student Responsibilities During program planning, the student is expected to meet with his or her guidance counselor regarding the availability of DE classes at the school site. The student must complete and submit an Application for Early College for admission to SCF by specified deadline and meet with the guidance counselor to review and make a copy of the completed application for admission before the specified deadline. The student should obtain a parent/guardian signature on the Application for Early College and submit to the guidance counselor. If no SAT or ACT scores are available, the student needs to schedule an appointment to take the PERT at the SCF Assessment and Testing Center. The student is required to bring picture ID and the temporary SCF ID card to the SCF Assessment and Testing Center on the day of testing. PLEASE NOTE: It is the responsibility of the student to speak with a counselor to determine SCF’s withdrawal deadlines. Please see section on withdraw policy on page 20. All applications and approval forms must be submitted to SCF by published deadlines.

94

10

High School Guidance Counselor Responsibilities During program planning, the guidance counselor will communicate to all interested students the DE admissions process and the appropriate deadlines and timelines for submitting applications/forms and taking the appropriate admissions assessment (PERT, SAT, or ACT). The counselor will also verify the student’s eligibility status and assist the student in making course selections. The counselor will also follow up with the student to ensure that the Application for Early College is turned in prior to specified deadlines and completed accurately and will keep a copy of the completed application for future reference. Finally, the counselor will verify the test scores for eligibility and keep a copy for student records.

Instructor Responsibilities Instructors are responsible for completing and forwarding enrollment and withdrawal paperwork by the prescribed SCF deadlines. Instructors are responsible for following timelines, curriculum, and syllabi information as outlined in the Faculty portion of this articulation agreement.

95

11

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA AND ACADEMIC PROCEDURES FOR COLLEGE DUAL ENROLLMENT (DE)

COLLEGE DUAL ENROLLMENT ON THE SCF CAMPUS [1007.27 (5) F.S.]

High school students enrolled in Manatee County district schools, including charter schools, in grades 11 and 12 (beginning in the fall term of the 11th grade year) may enroll in DE courses on an SCF campus. High school students must:

1. Have a minimum unweighted 3.0.cumulative grade point average (GPA). 2. Achieve a qualifying score on the SAT, ACT, or PERT by the published deadlines.

Test scores are valid for 2 years from the date of testing. 3. Maintain a high school GPA of 3.0 (unweighted) to remain eligible for the College Dual

Enrollment and Early Admissions Accelerated Programs.

4. Earn a “C” or better in all attempted dual enrollment classes in order to remain eligible for the program.

5. Meet all Early College published deadlines.

6. Satisfy any course prerequisites as required by the current SCF catalog. 7. Be enrolled in at least one (1) course at the high school.

Academic Impact The dual enrollment student receives both high school and college credit upon successful completion of the course(s). For the high school academic record, DE courses are weighted the same as IB, AP and Honors courses. Since college credit is awarded, this grade will remain a part of the college academic transcript as well as the high school academic transcript. Costs Public school students enrolled in the DE/EA Programs are exempt from the payment of lab fees and required textbooks. Students will be responsible for paying for all supplemental and/or recommended materials in each of these programs. Student Responsibilities During program planning, the student is expected to meet with his or her guidance counselor regarding the availability of DE classes at the school site as well as research the availability of courses at the SCF campus. Students may not take courses which conflict with their high school schedules. Students are required to be enrolled on a full-time basis with their high school in a combination of dual enrollment and high school courses (a total of seven high school credits—3.5 credits per semester). Students must complete and submit an Application for Early College to SCF by specified deadline and read and secure all signatures on the School District of Manatee County Dual Enrollment Contract. Students must also complete and submit the DE/EA Approval form signed by a parent/guardian by deadline and meet with the guidance counselor to review and make a

96

12

copy of the completed application for admission before the specified deadline. If no SAT or ACT scores are available, students must schedule an appointment to take the PERT at SCF. Students are required to bring picture ID and the temporary SCF ID card to the SCF Assessment and Testing Center on the day of testing. All paperwork must be submitted to SCF according to their designated deadlines. Students are required to submit the SCF schedule to the high school guidance counselor in order to obtain the textbook or a book voucher and obtain information regarding policies and procedures for one-time-use online access and picking up and returning required DE text books. All books must be returned to the high school textbook manager at the end of the semester that the course is completed. Books are expected to be returned 10 days after the semester ends. Students must also follow the add/drop and grading policies of SCF outlined in the current SCF catalog and are required to notify the high school counselor before dropping a course. Upon dropping the course, student must provide high school counselor with a copy of the SCF withdraw form. Lastly, students need to request that a copy of the SCF transcript be sent to the high school. High School Guidance Counselor Responsibilities During program planning, the guidance counselor will communicate to all interested students the DE admissions process and the appropriate deadlines and timelines for submitting applications/forms and taking the appropriate admissions assessment. The counselor will also verify the student’s eligibility status and assist the student in making course selections. The counselor will follow up with the student to ensure that the Application for Early College is turned in prior to specified deadlines and completed accurately. The counselor will also provide information regarding policies and procedures for one time use online access and picking up and returning required DE textbooks. The counselor will keep a copy of the completed application and other DE forms for future reference. Finally, the counselor will verify test scores for eligibility and keep a copy for student records.

97

13

EARLY ADMISSION TO COLLEGE

The Early Admission Program is a form of dual enrollment through which eligible high school students in grade 12 enroll at SCF on a full-time basis. Early Admission students must enroll in a minimum of 12 credit hours per semester, but may not exceed 16 credit hours per term.

1. Have a minimum unweighted grade point average (GPA) of 3.0 2. Must have completed six semesters of high school credit, a minimum of eighteen

(18) credit, enroll in courses that meet the requirements for an associate degree, and when necessary, must also enroll in DE courses that also meet high school graduation

3. Achieve a qualifying score on the SAT, ACT, or PERT by the published deadlines.

Test scores are valid for 2 years from the date of testing. 4. Maintain a high school GPA of 3.0 (unweighted) to remain eligible for the Early

Admission Program.

5. Earn a “C” or better in all attempted dual enrollment classes in order to remain eligible for the program.

6. Meet all Early College published deadlines.

7. Satisfy any course prerequisites as required by the current SCF catalog.

Academic Impact The early admission student enrolls full-time as an SCF college student and receives both college and high school credit upon successful completion of the course(s). The student must include in the college schedule courses that will meet the requirements for high school graduation. Students must satisfy any course prerequisites as required by the current SCF catalog. Early admission students must meet all state and district course graduation requirements in order to be awarded a high school diploma from the School District.

Costs Students enrolled in the Early Admissions Program are exempt from the payment of lab fees and required textbooks. Students are responsible for paying for all supplemental and/or recommended materials in each of these programs.

Procedures During program planning in the spring of the student’s junior year, the student must meet with his or her high school guidance counselor regarding the student’s eligibility for Early Admission to SCF. The student must submit an application for Early Admission, high school transcript and parent authorization by the published SCF deadlines. All dual enrollment applications and approval forms must be submitted to SCF by published deadlines.

98

14

Student Responsibilities The student must obtain written permission from the high school principal or designee and meet the test score requirements on the PERT, SAT, or ACT; test scores are valid for two (2) years from the date of testing. The student must complete and submit the DE/EA Approval form signed by a parent/guardian by the SCF published deadlines. At the conclusion of each semester the student must request and submit the SCF transcript to the guidance counselor and return textbooks to the high school textbook manager no later than ten (10) days after the last day of class. The student must follow the add/drop and grading policies of SCF; these policies are outlined in the current SCF catalog and notify the high school counselor before dropping a course. Upon dropping the course, student must provide high school counselor with a copy of the SCF withdraw form.

High School Guidance Counselor Responsibilities During program planning, the guidance counselor will communicate to all interested students the eligibility criteria and application process for the Early Admissions program and provide the appropriate deadlines and timelines for submitting applications/forms and taking the appropriate admissions assessment (PERT, SAT, or ACT). The counselor will verify the student’s eligibility status and assist the student in making course selections. The counselor will then follow up with the student to ensure that the Application for Early College is turned in prior to specified deadlines and completed accurately and keep a copy of the completed application and other DE forms for future reference. Finally, the counselor will verify test scores for eligibility and keep a copy for student records.

99

15

Special Notes and Policies:

1. Dual enrollment students are permitted to take a maximum of two courses per term on an SCF

campus. Students may take additional dual enrollment courses at the high school site, not to exceed a combination total of 16 credit hours per semester.

2. Early admissions students must enroll in a minimum of 12 credit hours per term, but may not

exceed 16 hours. If a student would like to take additional hours, they may pay for and take up to 18 hours as part of the college enrichment program.

3. Students who fail to notify the school guidance counselor and SCF Educational Records Office of course registration will be voided from classes for non-payment. It is the student’s responsibility to re-register for their courses. In addition, any schedule changes must be approved by the high school guidance counselor and reported to the SCF dual enrollment liaison in order to avoid being voided from selected courses. NOTE: In some cases, students who are voided for non-payment may be assessed special fees for re-instatement.

4. Students must earn a “C” or better in each college course taken in the Dual Enrollment Program.

Students who earn less than a “C” in a dual enrollment course will not be eligible to participate in dual enrollment the following semester. After one (1) semester, students may once again participate in the program with their high school approval. This academic policy applies to all dual enrollment courses; both at the high school and SCF.

5. Students who withdraw or are withdrawn from SCF must notify the high school guidance counselor immediately.

6. Students are required to complete a new dual enrollment approval form each semester they wish

to take courses. 7. Students are permitted to enroll in dual enrollment courses offered before, during or after school

hours and during summer terms. Students may be classified as both Dual Enrollment and College Enrichment in the same semester.

8. Not all college courses offered by State College of Florida, Manatee-Sarasota are available

through dual enrollment. Restrictions include, but are not limited to: a. The Dual Enrollment Course Equivalency Listing identifies the approved list of DE

courses. This listing is updated annually on www.facts.org. b. Remedial level and enrichment courses are not available for dual enrollment. This

includes applied art and music courses which carry special fees—please see restricted course list on page 27.

c. Flex start classes will only be approved on an individual basis, but not after the add/drop date of the traditional start of the term. Please see the Flex Start Classes Policy for detailed information.

d. Upper-level baccalaureate courses will not be available as part of SCF’s early college programs.

e. Certain nursing and health science courses due to age restrictions. These courses will be clarified by the appropriate Provost when necessary.

100

16

ACADEMIC PROCEDURES

COLLEGE ENRICHMENT [1007.27 (5) F.S.] College Enrichment is designed to provide an opportunity for qualified high school students to enroll in college level courses to add depth to their high school academic program. Students who enroll in College Enrichment courses will be classified as a “non degree seeking student” by SCF. Secondary students who wish to take college enrichment courses must meet the prerequisites required by SCF and complete the necessary application and forms. Academic Impact Credits earned may be applicable to an associate degree, but they will not be creditable toward a high school diploma; credits will not be added to the high school transcript.

Costs The student is responsible for the payment of all fees, including textbooks and supplemental and/or recommended materials.

Student Responsibilities The student must complete the online admissions application at www.scf.edu. The student must complete an affidavit for Florida residency. The student must achieve the required score on the PERT, SAT, or ACT. The student is responsible for the payment of all fees and textbook costs. If required, the student is responsible for submitting a high school transcript to SCF.

High School Guidance Counselor Responsibilities There are no special forms for a student to enroll in College Enrichment courses at SCF. Students work directly with SCF in order to participate in the College Enrichment program.

101

17

STUDENT INFORMATION Instructional Materials for Dual Enrollment and Early Admissions Students

Materials from dual enrollment courses will be available from either the SCF Bradenton or SCF Venice Bookstore. The Manatee County School Board is responsible for costs associated with required textbooks and materials. Receipt for the required instructional materials must be submitted to the County School Board. Home school students are responsible for payment of all lab fees and required instructional materials. All instructional materials (except those purchased by home school students) are the property of the School Board and will be retrieved and accounted for at the year’s end. Books shall be returned to the student’s high school textbook manager for return to the district instructional materials office and inventory. Monies due for loss or damage should be collected from students in the same manner as other instructional materials used in regular programs. Campus Resources

Students are entitled and encouraged to use SCF resources including libraries, computer labs, and tutorial labs. Parking Decals

Dual Enrollment and Early Admissions students are issued one parking decal per academic year free of charge. All students must go to the Security Office with a photo ID and copy of their class schedule in order to obtain their parking decal. Any fees accrued on campus due to parking violations are the responsibility of the student. SCF Student I.D.

All Early College students may obtain an SCF Student I.D. with a photo ID and another form of photo identification at the Security Office. This SCF Student I.D. will also act as a library card for the student. Students Requesting Accommodation for a Documented Disability SCF will ensure facility accessibility for all dual enrollment courses offered on an SCF campus. SCF will provide reasonable academic accommodations to qualified disabled individuals enrolled in dual enrollment courses on an SCF campus. Students desiring academic accommodations based on a documented disability in any dual enrollment course on an SCF campus must comply with SCF’s “Procedure for the Provision of Academic Accommodations.” The procedures require the disabled student to self-identify, provide documentation of their disability to the SCF Disability Resource Center, request necessary academic adjustments for each course and in each semester, and take an active role in the receipt of approved accommodations. Early College Maximum Age Enrollment Eligibility In order to participate in SCF’s Early College Programs, eligible students must be enrolled in high school grade 9-12. Students may participate in dual enrollment for a maximum of four (4) academic years OR until the conclusion of the high school year in which the student turns 19 (whichever comes first). In addition, students must meet all other GPA, qualifying test scores, and other eligibility requirements to participate in any SCF Early College Program.

102

18

Early College Academic Policy

Students must earn a “C” or better in each college course taken in the Dual Enrollment Program. Students who earn less than a “C” in a dual enrollment course will not be eligible to participate in dual enrollment the following semester. After one (1) semester, students may once again participate in the program with their high school approval. This academic policy applies to all dual enrollment courses; both at the high school and SCF. Note: Students may take courses for College Enrichment during this time. Maximum Course Load and Enrollment Policy Dual enrollment students will be permitted to take courses counting for high school credit as part of the dual enrollment program. Courses should not exceed the number of credits allowable by the school district. The maximum course load for dual enrollment students will be limited to two (2) SCF Campus-based courses per term (courses with accompanying labs are counted as one course) per semester or less as part of the Dual Enrollment Program in each full fall and spring term, and not to exceed two courses in the summer term. Students may take additional dual enrollment courses at their high schools, not to exceed a combined total of 16 hours per term. Additionally, students may take courses on the SCF campus through the college enrichment program. Students enrolling in college enrichment courses are responsible for all college-related costs, which include tuition, fees, and textbooks. Early Admission students must enroll in at least 12 credit hours per semester, but may not exceed 16 credit hours per term. In total, a student may not exceed 18 credit hours in a term at SCF in any combination of programs. Repeat Policy SCF will not waive the tuition for a second attempt on a dual enrollment course. Students wishing to repeat a course are required to pay all tuition and fees associated with the second attempt as part of the college enrichment program. Participating students will be eligible for SCF’s grade forgiveness policy (see SCF catalog for grade forgiveness policy). Flex Start Course Policy Flex start courses will only be approved as part of the student’s original course selections upon submission of the Early College Approval form by the published deadline. Flex start classes will only be considered on an individual basis and will be subject to SCF’s final approval. Flex start classes may not be added to a student’s schedule after the traditional add/drop period of the term (i.e. first week of classes of the fall, spring, or summer terms). Students who withdraw from an original dual enrollment course, may not then add a flex start course to their schedule. No flex start courses will be approved under the dual enrollment/early admissions program after the add/drop period of the traditional term start date. Students may choose to register and pay for a flex start course as part of the college enrichment program. The student would be responsible for all associated tuition and fees for the flex start course.

103

19

Withdraw Policy A student may withdraw from any course without the academic penalty of a “WF” grade by the withdraw deadline as listed in the State College of Florida, Manatee-Sarasota Academic Calendar for courses taken at a SCF campus. For courses onsite at the high school a student must speak to a high school guidance counselor for the withdraw deadline. It is the responsibility of the student to initiate the withdraw procedure. Prior to withdrawing from a dual enrollment course, the student must speak with his/her guidance counselor. For students taking DE courses on an SCF campus, they would log into their SCF connect accounts and withdraw online. For students taking courses at their high schools, they would be required to speak to their high school counselor to receive the withdraw form and return it to the SCF Educational Records Office. Failure to follow this procedure could result in a grade of “WF” being recorded for the student and “F” calculated in the grade point average [GPA]. Withdraws occurring after the established deadline will be granted only if a student demonstrates major verifiable extenuating circumstances clearly beyond the student’s control. All such requests must be made directly to the Campus Provost, who have the final approval/disapproval authority. In such approved cases, the “WF” would be changed to a “W” grade, with no GPA consequences.

Grading Policy

In accordance with statute 1007.235, it is the responsibility of the postsecondary educational institution for assigning letter grades for dual enrollment courses and the responsibility of school districts for posting dual enrollment course grades to the high school transcript as assigned by the postsecondary institution awarding the credit. Grades earned while a student is in the Early College program will become part of the student’s permanent college and high school transcript, GPA, and class rank. Students must maintain a 3.0 unweighted GPA in order to remain eligible for the Dual Enrollment/Early Admissions Programs. SCF does not send grade reports to students or high schools. Students are responsible for sending their grades to their schools. Some academic departments (e.g. Mathematics) utilize a common syllabus for each course. In those cases, the faculty member must use the provided syllabus and adhere to the grading procedures and policies outlined on the syllabus including the grading policy that a grade of 60% or higher must be earned on the final exam in order to pass the course with a C or higher. Transcripts

Students may request an official transcript from the SCF Educational Records Office for a fee of $7.00 USD. Students may print out their unofficial transcript from the SCF website. Students are responsible for sending their grades and transcripts to their schools. Student Code of Conduct Students taking dual enrollment courses are subject to the rules and regulations of State College of Florida, Manatee-Sarasota as established in the SCF Catalog and the Student Handbook.

104

20

Collegiate Environment While in college courses, students are subjected to a learning environment that promotes an open exchange of ideas. Course content is presented on an adult level, and class discussions require a mature understanding of divergent viewpoints and the ability to think critically on controversial issues. Impact on Future College/University Admissions and Scholarships Dual enrollment students who receive a failing grade may have difficulty in meeting future admission requirements at colleges and universities, including financial aid and scholarship opportunities.

105

21

FACULTY CERTIFICATION State College of Florida, Manatee-Sarasota Board of Trustees Rule number 2.09.01 states that to be certified, faculty must satisfy minimum certification requirements as specified by SACS. Verification that those requirements have been met shall be through the faculty member’s transcripts of graduate and undergraduate credits. The appropriate Department Chair will complete the State College of Florida, Manatee-Sarasota Faculty Certification form and submit it to the appropriate Campus Provost for approval by the published deadline of May 1, 2012. Subsequent to approval by the Vice President for Academic Quality and Success, the certification document is submitted to the SCF Office of Human Resources for placement in the faculty member’s personnel file. State College of Florida, Manatee-Sarasota employs competent faculty members qualified to accomplish the mission and goals of the institution. When considering acceptable qualifications of its faculty, State College of Florida, Manatee-Sarasota gives primary consideration to the highest degree earned according to the guidelines listed below:

a. Faculty teaching general education courses: a doctoral or a master’s degree in the teaching discipline or a master’s degree with a concentration in the teaching discipline (a minimum of 18 graduate hours in the teaching discipline).

b. Faculty teaching associate degree courses designed for transfer to a baccalaureate degree (these are designated A.A. courses at SCF): a doctoral or a master’s degree in the teaching discipline or a master’s degree with a concentration in the teaching discipline (a minimum of 18 graduate hours in the teaching discipline).

c. Faculty teaching associate degree courses not designed for transfer to the

baccalaureate degree (these are designated A.A.S. or A.S. courses at SCF): a baccalaureate degree in the teaching discipline, or an associate degree and demonstrated competencies in the teaching discipline.

State College of Florida, Manatee-Sarasota also considers competence, effectiveness, and capacity, including as appropriate, undergraduate and graduate degrees, related work experiences in the fields, professional licensure and certifications, honors and awards, continuous documented excellence in teaching, or other demonstrated competencies and achievement that contribute to effective teaching and student learning outcomes.

106

22

CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT

In all matters of classroom management, Dual Enrollment Faculty should direct questions and concerns to the respective Department Chair of State College of Florida, Manatee-Sarasota. The two academic divisions are Arts and Letters & Social and Behavioral Sciences; and Mathematics, Science, Technology, Business and Health and Physical Education. In addition, detailed information on policies and practices may be found in the on-line in Development Resources at http://www.scf.edu/FacultyStaff/AdjunctFacultyProfessionalDevelopment/default.asp . All county district schools (including charter schools) and registered home school students who participate in DE/ EA courses are subject to the College Student Code of Conduct as well as the classroom management, academic, and attendance policies and procedures of SCF. Syllabi, Handouts and Exams All Dual Enrollment instructors are required to provide their students with a course syllabus. The course syllabus is due to the SCF Department Chair within the first two weeks of t he SCF semester start date. All syllabi are subject to SCF approval and should follow the requirements of the approved syllabus template. The approved syllabus template is included in the Adjunct Faculty Development Resources and more specifically at: http://www.scf.edu/FacultyStaff/AdjunctFacultyProfessionalDevelopment/default.asp Some academic departments (e.g. Mathematics) utilize a common syllabus for each course. In those cases, the faculty member must use the provided syllabus and adhere to the grading procedures and policies outlined on the syllabus including the grading policy that a grade of 60% or higher must be earned on the final exam in order to pass the course with a C or higher. Course performance Standards: These can be communicated in one of two ways: 1. They may be copied directly onto the syllabus from the officially approved and most recent Curriculum Review and Development form for the appropriate course, or 2. They may be noted in a statement something like this: Students may access course performance standards by clicking on the “Course Performances Standards” link at the following web address. http://www.scf.edu/Academics/CoursePerformanceStandards.asp A hard copy may be obtained from the instructor or from the Department Office. (Please note that Departments may also wish to list their Department Web address if applicable) The SCF Department Chair will furnish specifics regarding the above requirements. A copy of the syllabus must be submitted to the SCF Department Chair during the first two weeks of class. Upon request, instructors are required to submit representative handouts and all exams to the SCF Department Chair throughout the term. Attendance Policy Punctual and regular class attendance is expected of all students. Any class session missed, regardless of cause, reduces the opportunity for learning and often adversely affects the grade a student achieves in a course. Dual Enrollment students are subject to all state and public school

107

23

rules and regulations regarding attendance. There is a general attendance policy available in the SCF Catalog; however, each instructor will need to communicate a specific attendance policy that notes consequences (deduction of points for late arrival, early departure, or complete absence.) Please note that after 3 hours (or what is specified on syllabus), students may be asked to withdraw. The key is to be as specific as possible without completely taking away instructor flexibility. Academic Misconduct Should any instance of academic misconduct arise, it is strongly suggested that the instructor confer with the Department Chair on the proper manner in which to proceed. A statement on penalties should be included in syllabus. Additional information on the student code of conduct can be found in the current SCF Catalog at http://www.scf.edu/Administration/AdministrativeDepartments/PublicAffairsMarketing/Publications/Catalog/default.asp and the Student Handbook/Planner. Statement of Plagiarism Policy If appropriate to your course, state this directly: Plagiarism is the use of ideas, facts, opinions, illustrative material, data, direct or indirect wording of another scholar and/or writer-professional or student-without giving proper credit. Expulsion, suspension, or any lesser penalty may be imposed for plagiarism. Copyright Law Faculties are expected to abide by the copyright laws. Guidelines regarding the current laws, especially as they relate to photocopying, videotaping and computer software are available in the Current SCF Rules: http://www.mccfl.edu/Administration/SCFRules/default.asp Student Complaint/Conflict Resolution A student may file a grievance through due process. SCF provides students an appropriate means to resolve conflicts or complaints concerning college rules, procedures, and/or course policies at the lowest level possible. The complete process can be found at: http://www.mccfl.edu/Administration/SCFRules/default.asp. Statement of Nondiscrimination SCF is an equal opportunity and access institution that does not discriminate on the basis of sex, race, religion, age, national origin/ethnicity, color, marital status, disability, genetic information, sexual orientation and any other factor prohibited under applicable federal, state, and local civil rights laws, rules and regulations in any of its educational programs, services or activities, including admission and employment. To report or discuss equity concerns, contact the SCF Equity Officer at 941-752-5323. Final Exams Dual Enrollment courses taught on the high school campus must meet/fulfill all competencies expected and outlined in the college course performance standards. To ensure equivalent rigor with on-campus courses, final examinations for all Dual Enrollment courses taught/delivered on the high school campus must be approved by the appropriate SCF curriculum/department chair. Final exams must be submitted to the SCF Department Chair for approval no later than the last two weeks of the semester.

108

24

Alternatively, final exams may be provided to the high school campus instructor by the college in a timely manner which ensures availability prior to scheduled administration dates. The academic department at SCF will determine which method above is to be followed for the course. Completed, scored exams will be returned to the State College of Florida department chair within two weeks of the end of the class and held for a period of 1 year. Please note that both Math and Natural Science utilize a department final examination. Instructor Evaluation The State College of Florida Department Chair or designee will evaluate Dual Enrollment faculty similarly to other adjunct faculty. One of the Dual Enrollment classes will be observed at least once (ideally) during the first year of offering, and periodically as needed in subsequent years. In addition, students will have an opportunity to complete the online student evaluation instrument during the last few weeks of class. More detailed instructions related to this will be given at the time of evaluation. Grading Policy In accordance with statute 1007.235, it is the responsibility of the postsecondary educational institution for assigning letter grades for dual enrollment courses and the responsibility of school districts for posting dual enrollment course grades to the high school transcript as assigned by the postsecondary institution awarding the credit. Grades earned while a student is in the Early College program will become part of the student’s permanent college and high school transcript, GPA, and class rank. Students must maintain a 3.0 unweighted GPA in DE or a 2.0 unweighted GPA in CTE-DE in order to remain eligible for the Dual Enrollment/CTE-Dual Enrollment/Early Admissions Programs. SCF does not send grade reports to students or high schools. Students are responsible for submitting their grades to their high schools. Some academic departments (e.g. Mathematics) utilize a common syllabus for each course. In those cases, the faculty member must use the provided syllabus and adhere to the grading procedures and policies outlined on the syllabus including the grading policy that a grade of 60% or higher must be earned on the final exam in order to pass the course with a C or higher. Final Grades Final grades will be submitted electronically to SCF in accordance with the SCF

Academic Calendar. The on-line Faculty handbook provides additional information on electronic grade entry.

Students taking dual enrollment courses on the SCF campus must request a transcript from the SCF Educational Records Office and pay the appropriate fee. The student is responsible for insuring that the high school registrar has a certified copy of the transcript or SCF grade report. Otherwise, the high school student will not receive credit for the SCF course at the high school.

State College of Florida, Manatee-Sarasota conforms to the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974 (FERPA). No student grades are posted in any public manner; no grades are provided by telephone. Students obtain their grades by conferring in person with their instructors or by accessing them online via SCF Connect.

Final grades for high school credit will be awarded on high school report cards and academic transcripts.

109

25

Dual Enrollment Course Recommendations The SCF Coordinator of Outreach and Early College or designee will confer with the District’s Director of Curriculum and Instruction, Director of Career and Technical Education, or/and Student Service’s Guidance Program Specialist to identify Dual Enrollment courses to be offered on high school campuses. A dual enrollment course equivalency listing can be found at www.facts.org. Instructional Materials According to the Dual Enrollment Articulation Agreement, the selection of texts and associated instructional materials (e.g., graphing calculators and software) is approved by the SCF Department Chair with input from the faculty members teaching the course. The recommended text(s) and course materials should be submitted for approval to respective department chair at SCF by April 1st of each year. Every effort will be made to continue the use of instructional materials in inventory. The County School Board will follow the state adoption cycle of updating textbooks every 6 years. All personnel will work to meet calendar needs requested by the Instructional Materials Services Manager. Instructional Materials Procedures for Students Taking Dual Enrollment Courses at the High School Site Instructional materials will be provided by the high school. All instructional materials are the property of the County School Board and will be retrieved and accounted for at the year’s end. Monies due for loss or damage should be collected from students in the same manner as other instructional materials used in regular programs. SCF Department Chair Contact Information Business and Technology—Amy Santos Natural Science—Jane Pfeilsticker Math—Jim Condor Language and Literature—Jane Duke Social and Behavioral Sciences—Barry Puett Fine and Performing Arts—Drew Webster Health Science—Sue Garland

110

26

REQUESTS FOR DUAL ENROLLMENT COURSES ON THE HIGH SCHOOL SITE All dual enrollment courses to be offered at the high school site must be selected from the approved SCF course offering list by the published deadline of February 1st. Each school may choose to offer up to ten (10) dual enrollment courses at the high school site per academic year. The approved dual enrollment courses are selected on the basis of the following criteria: Appropriateness of the course for transfer credit or degree programs. General education subjects which serve in the best interest of the student.

Any school wishing to offer dual enrollment courses not on the SCF approved course list may submit up to three (3) other courses for SCF consideration not to exceed a total of ten (10) dual enrollment courses per academic year at the high school site. Courses will be subject to approval by the Vice President of Academic Quality and Success. College success courses (SLS) and applied art/music courses will not be approved. Dates of initiation and length of courses offered through the Inter-institutional Articulation Agreement shall conform to the calendar of SCF and the high school must maintain the minimum number of contact hours required for college credit in specific courses. The following list outlines the approved SCF DE courses to be offered at the high school site: Area I Communications: ENC 1101, ENC 1102 Area II Mathematics: MAC 1105, MAC 1140, MAC 1114, MGF 1106, STA 2023 Area III Social Sciences: AMH 1010, AMH 1020, POS 1041 Area IV Humanities: ENL 2010, ENL 2022, HUM 2210, HUM 2230 Area V Natural Sciences: BSC 1005C, BSC 1008 Languages: German: GER 1120, GER 1121 Spanish: SPN 1120, SPN 1121

111

27

ADMINISTRATIVE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES Assurance of Transfer and Credit Policies Associate in Arts (A.A.) and Associate in Science (A.S.) credits received upon satisfactory completion of college courses offered through this agreement shall be transferable in the State of Florida as described in Rule 6A-10.024, FAC. [Articulation between Universities, Community Colleges and School Districts] Associate in Applied Science (A.A.S.) credits are not included in this rule and are not intended for transfer in the State University System. Career Pathways Articulation Career Pathways is a term used by Federal, State, and Local education to describe activities that are carried on by local consortia which exist for the purpose of promoting the transition from high school career and technical education to post-secondary technical degrees and certificates. The Suncoast Career Pathways Consortium consists of State College of Florida Manatee/Sarasota, Manatee County Schools, and Sarasota County Schools. This organization is supported by the Carl D. Perkins grant to carry on activities including yearly grant writing, creation of promotional materials, in-class presentations, staff development, parent presentations, committee assignments, articulation agreements, and any other activity that promotes the transfer of credits from secondary to postsecondary Career and Technical Programs. Students who complete a secondary Career Pathway and meet the eligibility requirements have the opportunity to receive college or technical school credit. The students must choose to continue in the same area of study at the postsecondary level in order to receive credit through articulation agreements with partner postsecondary schools. All Career Pathways are based on the course progression identified by the Florida Department of Education; the articulation agreements support more than 150 programs of study in the consortium. Assurance of High School Credit Upon satisfactory completion of dual enrollment courses, students will be awarded high school credit. Credit will be noted on high school transcript as well as official SCF transcript. Procedure To Inform Students And Parents Manatee County School Board will provide eligible students with an informational document describing the educational benefits and eligibility requirements for Early College programs. In a cooperative effort, SCF Early College Staff will be available to assist in providing information and answering specific questions. Excess Hours and Acceleration Mechanisms All eleven of the state’s public universities agree that credit hours earned through accelerated programs such as Advanced Placement, Dual Enrollment or College Level Examination Programs, that do not contribute toward the completion of a student’s degree, will not be counted for excess hours purposes. Relationship of Responsibilities Due to the parallel nature of dual enrollment and early admission course offerings, administrative and procedural responsibilities must be shared between the Manatee County School Board and SCF. Students must adhere to registration, attendance, and withdrawal policies as determined by the County School Board and State College of Florida, Manatee-Sarasota.

112

28

College Credit Dual Enrollment Rule Pursuant to Rule 6A-14.064, the College Credit Dual Enrollment Rule, clarifies the responsibility of the colleges in providing rigorous academic oversight for all dual enrollment courses, faculty credentials, exams, grades, and the awarding of postsecondary credit. This rule is in keeping with the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools accreditation requirements. The policies and procedures outlined in this agreement reflect the provisions of Rule 6A-14.064.

113

29

SCF COURSE LIST NOT APPROVED FOR DUAL ENROLLMENT/EARLY ADMISSION

MUC1211 MVB 1311 MVB 1312 MVS1313 MVB 1313 MVB 1314 MVS1314 MVB 1315 MVB 2321 MVS1316 MVB 2322 MVB 2323 MVS2321 MVB 2324 MVB 2325 MVS2321 MVK 1011A MVK 1011B MVS2322 MVK 1013A MVK 1013B MVS2323 MVK 1311 MVK 1313 MVS2324 MVK 2321 MVP 1011A MVS2326 MVP 1011B MVP 1311 MVV1011A MVP 2321 MVS 1011A MVV1011B MVS 1011B MVS 1012A MVV1311 MVS 1012B MVS 1013A MVV2321 MVS 1013B MVS 1014A MVW1011A MVS 1014B MVS 1016A MVW1011B MVS 1016B MVS 1311 MVW1012A MVS 1312 MVS 1313 MVW1012B MVB 1011A MUC 2221 MVW1013A MVB 1011B MVW1314 MVW1013B MVB 1012A MVW 1315 MVW1014A MVB 1012B MVW 2321 MVW1014B MVB 1013A MVW 2322 MVW1015A MVB 1013B MVW 2324 MVW1015B MVB 1014A MVW 2325 MVW1311 MVB 1014B MVW1312 MVB 1015A MVW1313 MVB 1015B *Physical education and remedial courses are also not approved for dual enrollment/early admissions *Additional department restrictions may apply—questionable courses are subject to SCF final approval

114

30

APPENDIX A

DUAL ENROLLMENT COURSE EQUIVALENCY INFORMATION

Please refer to the Dual Enrollment Course Equivalency List for the latest information on high school credit awarded for dual enrollment courses. For the most up to date list, please go to www.fldoe.org/articulation/pdf/DEList.pdf This list should not be interpreted as the total number of dual enrollment courses available. Current law allows for any course in the Statewide Course Numbering System, with the exception of remedial courses and Physical Education skills courses, to be offered as dual enrollment. Three-credit (or equivalent) postsecondary courses taken through dual enrollment shall be awarded at least 0.5 high school credits (postsecondary courses offered for fewer than three (3) credits may earn less than 0.5 high school credit), either as an elective or subject area credit as designated in the local inter-institutional articulation agreement.

115

31

APPENDIX B

CALCULATING COURSE CREDIT EQUIVALENCE FOR DUAL CREDIT AT THE HIGH SCHOOL AND COMMUNITY COLLEGE

The Dual Enrollment Course Equivalency List is an annually updated list of dual enrollment courses that meet high school graduation requirements and the amount of credit that must be awarded on students’ transcripts. While the list identifies commonly taken dual enrollment courses that satisfy subject area requirements, current law allows for any course in the Statewide Course Numbering System (SCNS) with the exception of physical education and remedial courses to be available for dual enrollment. This list can be found at www.facts.org.

According to the list, all three-credit (or equivalent) postsecondary courses taken through dual enrollment that are part of a postsecondary career / technical program of study (PSAV Certificate, Technical Certificate, Advanced Technical Certificate, ATD, AAS, AS) shall be awarded 0.5 elective credits toward high school graduation.

Three (3) college credits equal 0.5 high school credits for academic dual enrollment courses. Community college certificate programs are separated into courses, which makes transfer and articulation easier. As a guideline, 135 instructional hours is equivalent to one secondary credit (120 with block scheduling), however, the determination of equivalency should be based on content, not “seat time.” Instructional hours in career education programs are also known as “clock hours.” Career certificate programs are broken into discrete sets of competencies called occupational completion points (OCPs). Most OCPs are divisible by 75 clock hours, so, for example, a 150-clock hour OCP (or community college career-technical course) should be equivalent to one high school credit. Bright Futures Eligibility The Bright Futures Comprehensive Course Table (CCT) lists the secondary and dual enrollment postsecondary courses and programs used to determine Bright Futures eligibility. If there is a program or course specified in an inter-institutional articulation agreement that is not in the CCT, one should contact the Standards, Benchmarks, and Frameworks Section at 850-245-9020 for review and approval of the equivalency. Gold Seal Eligibility

To be eligible for the Gold Seal Scholarship, students must earn three secondary credits in a single career and technical program. Career-technical postsecondary credit (and where applicable, combined with high school course credit) earned through dual enrollment can be used to meet GSVS eligibility requirements. This articulation agreement between the SCF and the County District Schools provides for eligibility of DE, CTE-DE and EA courses to be considered for both Bright Futures and Gold Seal eligibility. High school and community college programs/courses that would apply toward for Bright Futures eligibility may be accessed at: http://nwrdc.fsu.edu/fnbpcm02.

116

32

School District of Manatee County Contract for SCF Dual Enrollment and Early Admissions

For information on SCF Dual Enrollment and Early Admissions, go to: www.scf.edu/futurestudents and click “Early College for High School Students”

SCF Enrollment Deadline ________ Student’s name _____________________________ Date _____________ As a student planning to take courses at SCF for Dual Enrollment (up to two courses per term) or Early Admission (12-16 credit hours at SCF), my parent/guardian and I understand:

1. I must take responsibility for meeting admission requirements and completing the application process with SCF. I must also take responsibility for meeting the SCF enrollment and testing deadlines as posted on the SCF website. I understand that SCF’s calendar is different from the school district’s calendar and that the school district has no authority to change or alter SCF’s calendar or procedures.

2. Once I am admitted to SCF, I must notify and work with my counselor on my course schedule each semester to ensure that I am completing the graduation requirements and registering for approved SCF courses. My counselor will give me a Dual Enrollment Form and approve my courses each semester before I am able to register for SCF courses.

3. Once I am enrolled at SCF and attending classes, I cannot withdraw from SCF until the semester is completed, nor will I drop or add SCF courses without the approval of my counselor.

4. If admitted to SCF, there will be no charge to me for tuition or books (unless I prefer to purchase my own books). I must submit a list of the required courses (obtained from the SCF website) to my counselor. Once approved, I will receive a book voucher and my counselor will explain the process of obtaining SCF textbooks. I understand I must return SCF textbooks to my high school at the end of each semester.

5. I will continue to be classified as a student with the School District of Manatee County and can participate on school teams and in school events, including graduation.

6. I will also be classified as an SCF student, and the course grades I earn at SCF will count for high school and college credit and will be recorded on both transcripts.

7. All SCF courses and grades will appear on my high school and SCF transcripts. Grades at both schools will be factored into my cumulative GPA, which is used to determine my class rank, eligibility for Bright Futures (and other scholarships), and future college admissions.

8. I have read and understand the School District of Manatee County Dual Enrollment Textbook Procedures and will comply with those guidelines.

__________________________________________________________ Student’s Signature _________________________________________________________ Parent/Guardian Signature _________________________________________________________ Counselor’s Signature

117

33

Addendum - College Center At Bayshore High School

The College Center at Bayshore is a program that provides greaterflexibility and opportunity for students at Bayshore High School to work toward achieving their Associates degree. Special Notes on Dual Enrollment and Early Admission through theCollege Center:

Students are required to be enrolled on a full-time basis in a

combination of dual enrollment and high school courses (a totalof seven courses).

Students who are classified as taking dual enrollment will be

permitted to enroll in one (1) to five (5) college credit classes per semester, either at Bayshore High or at the State College of Florida campus. The maximum enrollment will be five (5) college credit classes per semester.

Students who are classified as taking early admission will fall

under the same guidelines outlined under the early admissionprogram.

Early Admission students from the College Center will be

required to maintain contact with Bayshore High School as defined by the Bayshore High School administration.

118

34

STATE COLLEGE OF FLORIDA, MANATEE-SARASOTA AND MANATEE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD

ARTICULATION AGREEMENT 2012-2013

The purpose of this agreement is to define the acceleration mechanisms available between Manatee County School Board and State College of Florida, Manatee-Sarasota and to specify the details of the day-to-day operations of Dual Enrollment/Early Admission programs. This agreement is pursuant to and in furtherance of the provisions of F.S. 1007.235 and 1007.271. The term of this agreement shall remain in effect for the 2012-2013 academic year, which includes Fall 2012, Spring 2013, and Summer 2013 terms. An executed and signed letter of intent will constitute annual renewal. MANATEE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD APPROVAL: ____________________________________ ____________ Chair Date County School Board ____________________________________ ____________ Superintendant Date County School Board STATE COLLEGE OF FLORIDA, MANATEE-SARASOTA APPROVAL: ____________________________________ _____________ President Date State College of Florida, Manatee-Sarasota ____________________________________ _____________ Chairman, District Board of Trustees Date State College of Florida, Manatee-Sarasota

119

150

hugginn

Typewritten Text

08/29/12

OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT OF BUSINESS AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES

Carol F. Probstfeld, Vice President

TO: State College of Florida, Manatee – Sarasota District Board of Trustees FROM: Carol F. Probstfeld Vice President of Business and Administrative Services SUBJECT: Monthly Financial Report – June, 2012

Two Year Programs The report for Two Year Programs presents the Budget and Year-To-Date Revenue and Expense for this fiscal year and last fiscal year as of June 30, 2012. Presented is the Original Budget, Adjusted Budget, Year to Date Revenue and Expense, and the Percent Year-To-Date is of the Adjusted Budget. Noteworthy is the fact that total student fees assessed through June are less than those of last year by 4.02% due to a decrease in the enrollment. Federal Support reflects a decrease from last fiscal year to the current fiscal year of $1,763,170.65 due to the ending of ARRA funds. Overall, Revenues are $1,914,100.54 less than those reported last June. In the category of Expenses, overall Personnel Costs are down 2.58%. Other Personnel Expense is down 8.23% and the Fringe Benefits are down 21.43%. These changes are due to many factors such as timing differences in pay dates. Even though the year is 100.00% complete, personnel costs are at 91.97% of the amount budgeted for the current year. Current Expenses represent 84.53% of the amount budgeted and Capital Outlay expended is 72.15% of the amount budgeted.

169

hugginn

Typewritten Text

EXHIBIT L

08/29/12

In summary, with the year 100.00% complete:

• Year–To-Date Actual Revenue is 99.35% of the Adjusted Budget. • Year-To-Date Actual Expense is 89.75% of the Adjusted Budget. • Therefore, Revenues approximated the budget and Expenses are less

than what would be expected.

Baccalaureate Programs Total Revenue is $771,868.96 with Student Fees totaling $389,588.78 and Other Student Fees totaling $49,497.08. Expenses total $702,549.21, with Personnel totaling $607,619.26 and Current Expense totaling $93,797.01. Total Revenue is 81.70% of that budgeted and Total Expense is 71.26% of that budgeted.

Collegiate School (Reported under separate cover)

170

State College of FloridaTwo Year Revenue and Expense Comparison Report

As of Fiscal Period 14

Lower Level Programs

Acct. Type Description Orig Budget Adj Budget YTD Actual Orig Budget Adj Budget YTD Actual

PercentYTD Actual / Adj Budget

YTD Actual / Adj Budget

Percent

Fiscal Period 14, FY 2011Fiscal Period 14, FY 2012

Revenue41 Student Fees 20,625,601.00 19,614,808.8820,625,601.00 22,815,708.00 20,186,567.9922,828,518.0095.10% 88.43%42 Other Student Fees 3,269,457.00 3,920,014.993,284,542.00 3,241,094.00 2,868,802.893,246,584.00119.35% 88.36%43 Support From Local Government 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 44 State Support 21,487,541.00 21,325,533.3721,309,199.00 21,624,467.00 21,640,108.9821,624,467.00100.08% 100.07%45 Federal Support 43,500.00 93,643.4943,500.00 1,813,246.00 1,856,814.141,813,246.00215.27% 102.40%46 Gif ts, Private Grants & Contracts 0.00 500.000.00 0.00 500.000.00 47 Sales and Services Department 549,578.00 560,624.24549,578.00 611,838.00 860,404.64611,838.00102.01% 140.63%49 Other Revenue 111,800.00 157,099.05111,800.00 113,494.00 171,270.64113,494.00140.52% 150.91%4A Non-Revenue Receipts 67,448.00 20,759.5667,448.00 67,448.00 22,614.8467,898.0030.78% 33.31%

Total : Revenue 46,154,925.00 45,991,668.00 45,692,983.58 50,287,295.00 50,306,045.00 47,607,084.1299.35% 94.63%

Grand Total : Revenue 46,154,925.00 45,991,668.00 45,692,983.58 99.35% 50,287,295.00 50,306,045.00 47,607,084.12 94.63%

ExpensePersonnel

51 Salaries-Full Time & Perm Part Time 21,722,992.00 21,324,169.9621,697,090.00 21,357,034.00 20,287,061.3121,229,263.0098.28% 95.56%52 Other Personnel Exp P/T (Non-Perm) 5,205,093.00 4,650,645.914,874,611.00 5,230,561.00 5,067,620.025,212,041.0095.41% 97.23%53 Personnel Benef its 7,577,238.00 5,312,730.597,448,435.00 8,414,064.00 6,761,972.758,453,542.0071.33% 79.99%

Total : Personnel 34,505,323.00 34,020,136.00 31,287,546.46 35,001,659.00 34,894,846.00 32,116,654.0891.97% 92.04%

Current Expense61 Services 8,436,130.00 7,279,760.248,788,067.00 9,563,753.00 8,162,524.9010,410,993.0082.84% 78.40%62 Materials and Supplies 2,174,341.00 2,439,691.652,833,255.00 2,927,325.00 2,974,602.164,006,542.0086.11% 74.24%63 Other Current Charges 392,060.00 637,231.85671,367.00 519,015.00 4,162,359.763,106,690.0094.92% 133.98%69 Transfers 218,700.00 218,700.00218,700.00 317,145.00 208,800.001,281,461.00100.00% 16.29%

Total : Current Expense 11,221,231.00 12,511,389.00 10,575,383.74 13,327,238.00 18,805,686.00 15,508,286.8284.53% 82.47%

Capital71 Capital Outlay 250,029.00 414,673.99574,769.00 1,958,398.00 1,149,242.262,615,247.0072.15% 43.94%

Total : Capital 250,029.00 574,769.00 414,673.99 1,958,398.00 2,615,247.00 1,149,242.2672.15% 43.94%

Grand Total : Expense 45,976,583.00 47,106,294.00 42,277,604.19 89.75% 50,287,295.00 56,315,779.00 48,774,183.16 86.61%

Report created: 8/2/2012 10:37:53 AM Page 1 of 1SCF.Production Reports.Finance.Board Reports.Two Year Revenue and Expense Comparison.Two Year Revenue and Expense Comparison - Report

171


As of Fiscal Period 14

Upper Level Programs




Percent

Fiscal Period 14, FY 2011Fiscal Period 14, FY 2012

Revenue41 Student Fees 364,541.00 389,588.78364,541.00 248,891.00 173,454.42248,891.00106.87% 69.69%42 Other Student Fees 48,993.00 49,497.0848,993.00 21,254.00 26,791.1521,254.00101.03% 126.05%44 State Support 178,342.00 178,342.00178,342.00 181,242.00 181,242.00181,242.00100.00% 100.00%45 Federal Support 0.00 0.000.00 9.00 0.009.00 0.00%46 Gif ts, Private Grants & Contracts 0.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00 4A Non-Revenue Receipts 352,931.00 154,441.10352,931.00 22,029.00 0.0022,029.0043.76% 0.00%

Total : Revenue 944,807.00 944,807.00 771,868.96 473,425.00 473,425.00 381,487.5781.70% 80.58%

Grand Total : Revenue 944,807.00 944,807.00 771,868.96 81.70% 473,425.00 473,425.00 381,487.57 80.58%

ExpensePersonnel

51 Salaries-Full Time & Perm Part Time 434,020.00 432,711.05465,049.00 223,058.00 277,179.40223,058.0093.05% 124.26%52 Other Personnel Exp P/T (Non-Perm) 144,612.00 88,536.98144,612.00 37,000.00 11,933.5229,434.0061.22% 40.54%53 Personnel Benef its 139,425.00 86,371.23144,718.00 67,631.00 66,742.3767,631.0059.68% 98.69%

Total : Personnel 718,057.00 754,379.00 607,619.26 327,689.00 320,123.00 355,855.2980.55% 111.16%

Current Expense61 Services 167,250.00 55,927.88171,237.00 123,736.00 40,049.32107,606.0032.66% 37.22%62 Materials and Supplies 52,800.00 37,869.1359,190.00 12,000.00 30,328.8235,696.0063.98% 84.96%63 Other Current Charges 6,700.00 0.000.00 0.00 0.000.00

Total : Current Expense 226,750.00 230,427.00 93,797.01 135,736.00 143,302.00 70,378.1440.71% 49.11%

Capital71 Capital Outlay 0.00 1,132.941,140.00 10,000.00 25,440.0035,440.0099.38% 71.78%

Total : Capital 0.00 1,140.00 1,132.94 10,000.00 35,440.00 25,440.0099.38% 71.78%

Grand Total : Expense 944,807.00 985,946.00 702,549.21 71.26% 473,425.00 498,865.00 451,673.43 90.54%

Report created: 8/2/2012 10:39:04 AM Page 1 of 1SCF.Production Reports.Finance.Board Reports.Two Year Revenue and Expense Comparison.Two Year Revenue and Expense Comparison - Report

172

08/29/12

OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT OF BUSINESS AND ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES

Carol F. Probstfeld, Vice President

TO: State College of Florida, Manatee – Sarasota District Board of Trustees FROM: Carol F. Probstfeld Vice President of Business and Administrative Services SUBJECT: Monthly Financial Report – July, 2012

Two Year Programs The report for Two Year Programs presents the Budget and Year-To-Date Revenue and Expense for this fiscal year and last fiscal year as of July 31, 2012. Presented is the Original Budget, Adjusted Budget, Year to Date Revenue and Expense, and the Percent Year-To-Date is of the Adjusted Budget. Noteworthy is the fact that total student fees assessed through July are less than those of last year by 36.95% due to a decrease in the enrollment. Other Student Fees are also less than last year by 20.93%. Overall, Revenues are $5,074,401.15 less than those reported last July. In the category of Expenses, overall Personnel Costs are down 7.21%. Other Personnel Expense is down 34.55% and the Fringe Benefits are up 10.98%. These changes are due to many factors such as timing differences in pay dates. Even though the year is only 8.33% complete, personnel costs are at 2.87% of the amount budgeted for the current year. Current Expenses represent 4.59% of the amount budgeted and Capital Outlay expended is 0.51% of the amount budgeted.

173

08/29/12

In summary, with the year 8.33% complete:

• Year–To-Date Actual Revenue is 22.99% of the Adjusted Budget. • Year-To-Date Actual Expense is 3.34% of the Adjusted Budget. • Therefore, Revenues are greater than and Expenses are less than what

would be expected on a percentage of budget basis.

Baccalaureate Programs Total Revenue is $285,186.59 with Student Fees totaling $259,195.19 and Other Student Fees totaling $25,991.40. Expenses total $16,309.36, with Personnel totaling $16,290.91 and Current Expense totaling $18.45. Total Revenue is 26.12% of that budgeted and Total Expense is 1.76% of that budgeted.

Collegiate School (Reported under separate cover)

174

State College of Florida

Two Year Revenue and Expense Comparison Report

As of JulyLower Level Programs

July , FY 2013 July , FY 2012Percent PercentYTD Actual / YTD Actual /

Acct. Type Description Orig Budget Adj Budget YTD Actual Adj Budget Orig Budget Adj Budget YTD Actual Adj BudgetRevenue

41 (A) Student Fees 20,702,611.00 20,702,611.00 8,020,689.53 38.74% 20,625,601.00 20,625,601.00 12,720,166.06 61.67%42 (A) Other Student Fees 3,524,131.00 3,524,131.00 1,095,746.21 31.09% 3,269,457.00 3,269,457.00 1,385,762.62 42.39%44 State Support 21,294,443.00 21,294,443.00 1,478,198.00 6.94% 21,487,541.00 21,487,541.00 1,563,026.48 7.27%45 Federal Support 87,830.00 87,830.00 0.00 0.00% 43,500.00 43,500.00 0.00 0.00%46 Gifts, Private Grants & Contracts 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0047 Sales and Services Department 528,661.00 528,661.00 58,141.38 11.00% 549,578.00 549,578.00 61,404.11 11.17%49 Other Revenue 157,070.00 157,070.00 6,096.14 3.88% 111,800.00 111,800.00 1,921.14 1.72%4A Non-Revenue Receipts 67,450.00 67,450.00 8.00 0.01% 67,448.00 67,448.00 1,000.00 1.48%

(A) Total : Revenue 46,362,196.00 46,362,196.00 10,658,879.26 22.99% 46,154,925.00 46,154,925.00 15,733,280.41 34.09%

Grand Total : Revenue 46,362,196.00 46,362,196.00 10,658,879.26 22.99% 46,154,925.00 46,154,925.00 15,733,280.41 34.09%ExpensePersonnel

51 Salaries-Full Time & Perm Part Time 21,730,362.00 21,730,362.00 603,777.17 2.78% 21,722,992.00 21,722,992.00 657,852.57 3.03%52 Other Personnel Exp P/T (Non-Perm) 4,640,900.00 4,640,900.00 91,522.93 1.97% 5,205,093.00 5,205,093.00 139,839.62 2.69%53 Personnel Benefits 7,362,457.00 7,362,457.00 273,840.69 3.72% 7,577,238.00 7,577,238.00 246,744.25 3.26%

Total : Personnel 33,733,719.00 33,733,719.00 969,140.79 2.87% 34,505,323.00 34,505,323.00 1,044,436.44 3.03%Current Expense

61 Services 9,238,119.00 9,595,764.00 574,590.13 5.99% 8,436,130.00 8,693,041.00 616,469.13 7.09%62 Materials and Supplies 3,269,225.00 3,355,381.00 24,273.99 0.72% 2,174,341.00 2,268,544.00 33,258.34 1.47%63 Other Current Charges 379,200.00 379,507.00 23,335.72 6.15% 392,060.00 392,060.00 24,188.64 6.17%69 Transfers 229,000.00 229,000.00 0.00 0.00% 218,700.00 218,700.00 0.00 0.00%

Total : Current Expense 13,115,544.00 13,559,652.00 622,199.84 4.59% 11,221,231.00 11,572,345.00 673,916.11 5.82%Capital

71 Capital Outlay 389,473.00 378,227.00 1,927.60 0.51% 250,029.00 307,431.00 3,029.40 0.99%

Total : Capital 389,473.00 378,227.00 1,927.60 0.51% 250,029.00 307,431.00 3,029.40 0.99%Grand Total : Expense 47,238,736.00 47,671,598.00 1,593,268.23 3.34% 45,976,583.00 46,385,099.00 1,721,381.95 3.71%

(A) Due to Banner error in FY2011-12 comparison of fiscal years is not valid. Correction completed in August.

Report created: 8/13/2012 1:12:27 PM Page 1 of 1SCF.Production Reports.Finance.Board Reports.Two Year Revenue and Expense Comparison.Two Year Revenue and Expense Comparison - Report

175


As of July

Upper Level Programs




Percent

July , FY 2012July , FY 2013

Revenue41 Student Fees 845,936.00 259,195.19845,936.00 364,541.00 52,277.16364,541.0030.64% 14.34%42 Other Student Fees 67,674.00 25,991.4067,674.00 48,993.00 5,383.2648,993.0038.41% 10.99%44 State Support 178,164.00 0.00178,164.00 178,342.00 0.00178,342.000.00% 0.00%4A Non-Revenue Receipts 0.00 0.000.00 352,931.00 0.00352,931.00 0.00%

Total : Revenue 1,091,774.00 1,091,774.00 285,186.59 944,807.00 944,807.00 57,660.4226.12% 6.10%

Grand Total : Revenue 1,091,774.00 1,091,774.00 285,186.59 26.12% 944,807.00 944,807.00 57,660.42 6.10%

ExpensePersonnel

51 Salaries-Full Time & Perm Part Time 443,233.00 12,603.50443,233.00 434,020.00 15,110.20434,020.002.84% 3.48%52 Other Personnel Exp P/T (Non-Perm) 71,136.00 471.1871,136.00 144,612.00 1,205.50144,612.000.66% 0.83%53 Personnel Benef its 101,925.00 3,216.23101,925.00 139,425.00 4,927.84139,425.003.16% 3.53%

Total : Personnel 616,294.00 616,294.00 16,290.91 718,057.00 718,057.00 21,243.542.64% 2.96%

Current Expense61 Services 207,982.00 18.45199,682.00 167,250.00 1,834.22172,067.000.01% 1.07%62 Materials and Supplies 72,846.00 0.0081,146.00 52,800.00 0.0052,800.000.00% 0.00%63 Other Current Charges 14,000.00 0.0014,000.00 6,700.00 0.006,700.000.00% 0.00%

Total : Current Expense 294,828.00 294,828.00 18.45 226,750.00 231,567.00 1,834.220.01% 0.79%

Capital71 Capital Outlay 15,000.00 0.0015,000.00 0.00 0.000.000.00%

Total : Capital 15,000.00 15,000.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00%

Grand Total : Expense 926,122.00 926,122.00 16,309.36 1.76% 944,807.00 949,624.00 23,077.76 2.43%

Report created: 8/10/2012 2:27:08 PM Page 1 of 1SCF.Production Reports.Finance.Board Reports.Two Year Revenue and Expense Comparison.Two Year Revenue and Expense Comparison - Report

176

RESOLUTION NUMBER: Forty-Seven (47) FISCAL YEAR: 2011-2012AMENDMENT NUMBER: Forty-Seven (47) June 2012

FUND NAME: CURRENT UNRESTRICTED FUND NUMBER: 11000

PRESENT REVISED CATEGORY BUDGET INCREASE DECREASE BUDGET

--------- ----------------------------------------------------- - --------------------------- ----- --------------------- ----- --------------------- ------- ------------------------------Beginning Fund Balance $ 6,112,375 $ 180,593 $ $ 6,292,968

REVENUES 46,170,010 178,342 45,991,668 (Detail Attached)

--------------------------- --------------------- --------------------- ------------------------------TOTAL TO BE ACCOUNTED FOR $ 52,282,385 $ 180,593 $ 178,342 $ 52,284,636

=============== ============ ============ =================

SALARIES $ 34,304,417 $ $ 284,281 $ 34,020,136 (Detail Attached)

CURRENT EXPENSES 12,217,683 293,706 12,511,389 (Detail Attached)

CAPITAL OUTLAY 581,943 7,174 574,769 (Detail Attached)

ENDING FUND BALANCE 5,178,342 5,178,342--------------------------- --------------------- --------------------- ------------------------------

TOTAL ACCOUNTED FOR $ 52,282,385 $ 293,706 $ 291,455 $ 52,284,636=============== ============ ============ =================

JUSTIFICATION: To realign budget to meet departmental needs.Revenue: Transfer to Upper Level Programs.Fund Balance: Transfer to Upper Level Programs in the amount of $178,342 and Strategic Enrollment Initiatives in the amount of $2,251.

Certified ____________________________________________________________ Adopted: August 29, 2012 Stephen J. Korcheck, President Lars A. Hafner, President===== ============================== = =============== === ============ === ============ ==== =================

BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUESTSTATE COLLEGE OF FLORIDA, MANATEE - SARASOTA

177

hugginn

Typewritten Text

EXHIBIT M

RESOLUTION NUMBER: Forty-Eight (48) FISCAL YEAR: 2011-2012AMENDMENT NUMBER: Forty-Eight (48) June 2012

FUND NAME: GENERAL RESTRICTED FUND NUMBER: TWO


--------- ----------------------------------------------------- ------- --------------------------- ------ --------------------- -------- --------------------- ------------- --------------------------Beginning Fund Balance $ 157,997 $ $ $ 157,997

REVENUES 7,327,930 525 7,328,455 (Detail Attached)

--------------------------- --------------------- --------------------- --------------------------TOTAL TO BE ACCOUNTED FOR $ 7,485,927 $ 525 $ 0 $ 7,486,452

=============== ============ ============ ===============



CAPITAL OUTLAY 487,361 487,361 (Detail Attached)

ENDING FUND BALANCE 0 0--------------------------- --------------------- --------------------- --------------------------

TOTAL ACCOUNTED FOR $ 7,485,927 $ 8,697 $ 8,172 $ 7,486,452=============== ============ ============ ===============

Justification: To realign budget to meet departmental needs.Revenue: Due to SCF Foundation support for Summer Bridge in the amount of $525.

Certified ____________________________________________________________ Adopted: August 29, 2012 Stephen J. Korcheck, President Lars A. Hafner, President===== ============================== ==== =============== === ============ ==== ============ ======= ===============


178

BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST

RESOLUTION NUMBER: Forty-Nine (49) FISCAL YEAR: 2011-2012AMENDMENT NUMBER: Forty-Nine (49) June 2012

FUND NAME: UNEXPENDED PLANT FUND FUND NUMBER: Seven


--------- ----------------------------------------------------- ------ --------------------------- ----- --------------------- ----- --------------------- ------ ---------------------------Beginning Fund Balance $ 4,244,447 $ $ $ 4,244,447

REVENUES 5,567,087 5,567,087 (Detail Attached)

--------------------------- --------------------- --------------------- ---------------------------TOTAL TO BE ACCOUNTED FOR $ 9,811,534 $ 0 $ 0 $ 9,811,534

=============== ============ ============ ===============

SALARIES $ 275,294 $ $ $ 275,294 (Detail Attached)

CURRENT EXPENSES 521,275 458 521,733 (Detail Attached)

CAPITAL OUTLAY 9,014,965 458 9,014,507 (Detail Attached)

ENDING FUND BALANCE 0 0--------------------------- --------------------- --------------------- ---------------------------

TOTAL ACCOUNTED FOR $ 9,811,534 $ 458 $ 458 $ 9,811,534=============== ============ ============ ===============

JUSTIFICATION: To realign budgets to meet departmental needs.

Certified ____________________________________________________________ Adopted: August 29, 2012 Stephen J. Korcheck, President Lars A. Hafner, President===== ============================== === =============== == ============ === ============ === ===============

STATE COLLEGE OF FLORIDA, MANATEE - SARASOTA

179


RESOLUTION NUMBER: Fifty (50) FISCAL YEAR: 2011-2012AMENDMENT NUMBER: Fifty (50) June 2012

FUND NAME: Collegiate School FUND NUMBER: 23000


--------- ----------------------------------------------------- ------ --------------------------- ----- --------------------- ----- --------------------- ------ ---------------------------Beginning Fund Balance $ 0 $ 0 $ $ 0



=============== ============ ============ ===============


CURRENT EXPENSES 410,106 10,301 420,407 (Detail Attached)



TOTAL ACCOUNTED FOR $ 1,563,178 $ 10,301 $ 10,301 $ 1,563,178=============== ============ ============ ===============

JUSTIFICATION:

To realign budgets to meet departmental needs.



180

RESOLUTION NUMBER: One (1) FISCAL YEAR: 2012-2013AMENDMENT NUMBER: One (1) July 2012

FUND NAME: CURRENT UNRESTRICTED FUND NUMBER: 11000


--------- ----------------------------------------------------- - --------------------------- ----- --------------------- ----- --------------------- ------- ------------------------------Beginning Fund Balance $ 7,800,000 $ 432,861 $ $ 8,232,861


--------------------------- --------------------- --------------------- ------------------------------TOTAL TO BE ACCOUNTED FOR $ 54,162,196 $ 432,861 $ 0 $ 54,595,057

=============== ============ ============ =================

SALARIES $ 33,733,719 $ $ $ 33,733,719 (Detail Attached)


CAPITAL OUTLAY 389,473 11,246 378,227 (Detail Attached)

ENDING FUND BALANCE 6,923,459 6,923,459--------------------------- --------------------- --------------------- ------------------------------

TOTAL ACCOUNTED FOR $ 54,162,195 $ 444,108 $ 11,246 $ 54,595,057=============== ============ ============ =================

JUSTIFICATION: To realign budget to meet departmental needs.Fund Balance: Due to roll forward of encumbrances.

Certified ____________________________________________________________ Adopted: October 26, 2011 Stephen J. Korcheck, President Lars A. Hafner, President===== ============================== = =============== === ============ === ============ ==== =================


181

RESOLUTION NUMBER: Two (2) FISCAL YEAR: 2012-2013AMENDMENT NUMBER: Two (2) July 2012

FUND NAME: GENERAL RESTRICTED FUND NUMBER: TWO


--------- ----------------------------------------------------- ------- --------------------------- ------ --------------------- -------- --------------------- ------------- --------------------------Beginning Fund Balance $ 0 $ 7,597 $ $ 7,597

REVENUES 3,096,833 1,139,974 4,236,807 (Detail Attached)

--------------------------- --------------------- --------------------- --------------------------TOTAL TO BE ACCOUNTED FOR $ 3,096,833 $ 1,147,571 $ 0 $ 4,244,404

=============== ============ ============ ===============

SALARIES $ 1,650,356 $ 298,428 $ $ 1,948,784 (Detail Attached)


CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 194,325 194,325 (Detail Attached)

ENDING FUND BALANCE 0 0--------------------------- --------------------- --------------------- --------------------------

TOTAL ACCOUNTED FOR $ 3,096,833 $ 1,147,571 $ 0 $ 4,244,404=============== ============ ============ ===============

Justification: To realign budget to meet departmental needs.Fund Balance: Due to rolled budgets from 2011-12, use of Fund Balance.Revenue: Due to rolled budgets for grants-$317,461, C/F e-Learning-$21,422, Perkins grant-$515,572, Workforce Braille Battery grant- $32,760, and 3rd year of Polk grant-$252,759.

Certified ____________________________________________________________ Adopted: August 29, 2012 Stephen J. Korcheck, President Lars A. Hafner, President===== ============================== ==== =============== === ============ ==== ============ ======= ===============


182


RESOLUTION NUMBER: Three (3) FISCAL YEAR: 2012-2013AMENDMENT NUMBER: Three (3) July 2012

FUND NAME: UNEXPENDED PLANT FUND FUND NUMBER: Seven


--------- ----------------------------------------------------- ------ --------------------------- ----- --------------------- ----- --------------------- ------ ---------------------------Beginning Fund Balance $ 0 $ 4,336,907 $ $ 4,336,907

REVENUES 11,821,116 157,484 11,978,600 (Detail Attached)

--------------------------- --------------------- --------------------- ---------------------------TOTAL TO BE ACCOUNTED FOR $ 11,821,116 $ 4,494,391 $ 0 $ 16,315,507

=============== ============ ============ ===============

SALARIES $ 0 $ 235,966 $ $ 235,966 (Detail Attached)

CURRENT EXPENSES 246,706 130,069 376,775 (Detail Attached)

CAPITAL OUTLAY 11,574,410 4,128,356 15,702,766 (Detail Attached)


TOTAL ACCOUNTED FOR $ 11,821,116 $ 4,494,391 $ 0 $ 16,315,507=============== ============ ============ ===============

JUSTIFICATION: To realign budgets to meet departmental needs.Fund Balance: Budget Balance Forward-$4,181,151, transfers back to control-$(75,042), Trane reimbursement-$(5,168), and General Renovation and Remodeling-$235,966.Revenue: Due to Building 400 Computer Lab-$104,900, Building 10 renovation-$50,000, and Trane reimbursement-$2,584.



183


RESOLUTION NUMBER: Four (4) FISCAL YEAR: 2011-2012AMENDMENT NUMBER: Four (4) July 2012

FUND NAME: Upper Division Fund FUND NUMBER: 12000


--------- ----------------------------------------------------- ------ --------------------------- ----- --------------------- ----- --------------------- ------ ---------------------------Beginning Fund Balance $ 0 $ $ $ 0



=============== ============ ============ ===============

SALARIES $ 616,294 $ $ $ 616,294 (Detail Attached)

CURRENT EXPENSES 294,828 294,828 (Detail Attached)


ENDING FUND BALANCE 165,652 165,652--------------------------- --------------------- --------------------- ---------------------------


JUSTIFICATION:


Certified ____________________________________________________________ Adopted: April 25, 2012 Stephen J. Korcheck, President Lars A. Hafner, President===== ============================== === =============== == ============ === ============ === ===============


184


RESOLUTION NUMBER: Five (5) FISCAL YEAR: 2011-2012AMENDMENT NUMBER: Five (5) July 2012

FUND NAME: Collegiate School FUND NUMBER: 23000


--------- ----------------------------------------------------- ------ --------------------------- ----- --------------------- ----- --------------------- ------ ---------------------------Beginning Fund Balance $ 0 $ 0 $ $ 0



=============== ============ ============ ===============

SALARIES $ 1,377,360 $ $ $ 1,377,360 (Detail Attached)

CURRENT EXPENSES 492,238 492,238 (Detail Attached)

CAPITAL OUTLAY 0 0 (Detail Attached)



JUSTIFICATION:




185

ASSETS

Current Assets

Cash $ 247,332.20

Accounts Receivable -

Total Current Assets 247,332.20

Depreciable Capital Assets, Net of Acumulated Depreciation

of $18,184.70 169,903.51

Total Assets $ 417,235.71

LIABILITIES AND NET ASSETS

Current Liabilities

Accounts Payable $ -

Deferred Wages 38,919.83

Accrued Compensated Absences 2,107.79

Total Current Liabilities 41,027.62

Non-Current Liabilities

Accrued Compensated Absences 25,293.40

Total Liabilities 66,321.02

Net Assets

Invested in Capital Assets, net of related debt 169,903.51

Unrestricted 181,011.18

Total Net Assets 350,914.69

Total Liabilities and Net Assets $ 417,235.71

As of July 31, 2012

STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS

A CHARTER SCHOOL AND RESTRICTED FUND OF STATE COLLEGE OF FLORIDA, MANATEE-SARASOTA

STATE COLLEGE OF FLORIDA COLLEGIATE SCHOOL

July 31, 2012

As of

1186

hugginn

Typewritten Text

EXHIBIT N

For the Month Ended

July 31, 2012

REVENUES

Operating Revenues $ - $ -

Total Operating Revenues - -

EXPENSES

Operating Expenses

Salaries 9,589.06 9,589.06

Benefits 6,193.01 6,193.01

Contractual Services - -

Other Services and Expenses 121.20 121.20

Materials and Supplies - -

Total Operating Expenses 15,903.27 15,903.27

Operating Loss (15,903.27) (15,903.27)

Nonoperating Revenues (Expenses)

State Appropriations From County School District 136,767.07 136,767.07

Subsidy from SCF Auxiliary - -

Federal Grant - -

Private Gifts and Grants - -

Other Nonoperating Revenues 967.65 967.65

Total Nonoperating Revenues 137,734.72 137,734.72

121,831.45 121,831.45

Capital Appropriations - -

Total Other Revenues - -

Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets 121,831.45 121,831.45

Net Assets at Beginning of Month/Year 229,083.24 229,083.24

Net Assets at End of Month/Year $ 350,914.69 $ 350,914.69

Income (Loss) Before Other Revenues, Expenses, Gains or

Losses

For the One Month Ended July 31, 2012

STATEMENT OF REVENUES, EXPENSES AND CHANGES IN NET ASSETS



July 31, 2012

Year To Date

2187

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES

Payments to Suppliers for Goods and Services $ (716.09)

Payments to Employees (29,048.98)

Payments for Benefits (6,193.01)

Net Cash Used By Operating Activities (35,958.08)

CASH FLOWS FROM NONCAPITAL FINANCING ACTIVITIES

State Appropriations Through County 136,767.07

Subsidy from SCF Auxiliary -

Federal Grant -

Private Gifts and Grants -

Other Nonoperating receipts 967.65

Net Cash Provided By Noncapital Financing Activities 137,734.72

CASH FLOWS FROM CAPITAL AND RELATED FINANCING ACTIVITIES

Capital Appropriations -

Purchase of Capital Assets -

Net Cash Used By Capital and Related Financing Activities -

Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents 101,776.64

Cash and Cash Equivalents at Beginning of Year 145,555.56

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Month $ 247,332.20

RECONCILIATION OF NET OPERATING REVENUES (EXPENSES)

TO NET CASH PROVIDED (USED) BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES

Operating (Loss) Income $ (15,903.27)

Adjustments To Reconcile Net Operating Loss To Net Cash

Provided (Used) By Operating Activities

(Decrease) Increase in Accounts Payable (594.89)

(Decrease) Increase in Accrued Payroll Expenses (19,459.92)

Net Cash Used By Operations $ (35,958.08)

For the Month Ended July 31, 2012

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS



3188



NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AS OF JULY 31, 2012

4

NOTE A – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Reporting Entity: The State College of Florida Collegiate School (the “Charter School”) is a restricted fund of State

College of Florida, Manatee-Sarasota (the “College”). The general operating authority of the Charter School is

contained in Section 1002.33, Florida Statutes. The Charter School operates under a charter with the sponsoring

school district, The School Board of Manatee County, Florida (Sponsor). The initial charter is effective until June 30,

2015, and may be renewed pursuant to Section 1002.33, Florida Statutes, for such duration as may be established

by mutual written consent of the parties and by successful completion of the renewal process. At the end of the

term of the charter, the Sponsor may choose not to renew the charter, in which case, the Sponsor is required to

notify the Charter School in writing at least 90 days prior to the charter’s expiration. During the term of the

charter, the Sponsor may also terminate the charter if good cause is shown. The Charter School shall notify the

Sponsor in writing at least 90 days prior to the expiration of the charter as to its intent to renew or not renew.

Basis of Presentation: The records of the Charter School are maintained as a restricted fund on the books of the

College and accordingly, they follow the same basis of presentation. The Charter School’s accounting policies

conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America applicable to colleges and

universities as prescribed by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). The National Association of

College and University Business Officers (NACUBO) also provides the College with recommendations prescribed in

accordance with generally accepted accounting principles promulgated by GASB and the Financial Accounting

Standards Board (FASB), such as GASB Statement No. 35, Basic Financial Statements and Management’s Discussion

and Analysis for Public Colleges and Universities. GASB Statement No. 35 includes public colleges and universities

within the financial reporting guidelines of GASB Statement No. 34, Basic Financial Statements and Management

Discussion and Analysis for State and Local Governments. GASB Statement No. 35 allows public colleges and

universities the option of reporting as a special-purpose government either engaged in only business-type

activities, or engaged in both governmental and business-type activities. The College elected to report as an entity

engaged in only business-type activities. Therefore, these special-purpose financial statements are presented

accordingly.

Basis of Accounting: Basis of accounting refers to when revenues, expenses and related assets and liabilities are

recognized in the accounts and reported in the financial statements. Specifically, it relates to the timing of the

measurements made, regardless of the measurement focus applied. The Charter School’s financial statements are

presented using the economic resources measurement focus and accrual basis of accounting. Revenue, expenses,

gains, losses, assets, and liabilities resulting from exchange and exchange-like transactions are recognized when

the exchange takes place. Revenues, expenses, gains, losses, assets, and liabilities resulting from non-exchange

activities are generally recognized when all applicable eligibility requirements, including time requirements, are

met. The Charter School’s principal activity is instruction. Operating revenues and expenses include all fiscal

transactions related to instruction as well as administration, academic support, student services, physical plant

operations, and depreciation of capital assets. Non-operating revenues include state appropriations from the

county school district, subsidies from the College, federal grants, Charter School Capital Outlay Funds (when

available), and other grants. The Charter School follows GASB pronouncements and FASB pronouncements issued

on or before November 30, 1989, unless the FASB pronouncements conflict with GASB pronouncements. Under

GASB Statement No. 20, Accounting and Financial Reporting for Proprietary Funds and Other Governmental

189




AS OF JULY 31, 2012

5

Entities That Use Proprietary Fund Accounting, the College has the option to elect to apply all pronouncements of

FASB issued after November 30, 1989, unless those pronouncements conflict with GASB pronouncements. The

College has elected not to apply FASB pronouncements issued after November 30, 1989.

Cash and Cash Equivalent: Amounts reported as cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand and cash in

demand deposit accounts. Cash deposits of the Charter School are held by banks qualified as public depositories

under Florida law. All such deposits are insured by Federal depository insurance, up to specified limits, or

collateralized with securities held in Florida’s multiple financial institution collateral pool required by Chapter 280,

Florida Statutes. For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Charter School considers all unrestricted and

restricted highly liquid investments, such as money market accounts, to be cash equivalents.

Capital Assets: The Charter School uses the policies of the College for capitalization and depreciation. The Charter

School has a capitalization threshold of $5,000 for tangible personal property and $25,000 for improvements other

than buildings. All capital assets are depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. A

useful life of 5 years is being used for equipment.

Net Assets: When both restricted and unrestricted resources are available to fund certain programs or expenses, it

is the Charter School’s policy to first apply restricted resources to such programs or expenses followed by the use

of the unrestricted resources.

Revenue Sources: Revenue for current operations is received primarily from The School Board of Manatee County,

Florida pursuant to the funding provisions included in the Charter. In accordance with the funding provisions of the

Charter and Section 1002.33(18) (b), Florida Statutes, the Charter School reports its student enrollment to the

Sponsor. State appropriations and grant funding are classified as non-operating revenue.

Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.

190




AS OF JULY 31, 2012

6

NOTE B – CAPITAL ASSETS

Capital asset activity for the month ended July 31, 2012, was as follows:

Beginning Ending

Balance Additions Deletions Balance

Capital assets, being depreciated

Equipment 181,844.16$ 6,244.05$ -$ 188,088.21$

Total capital assets being depreciated 181,844.16 6,244.05 - 188,088.21

Less accumulated depreciation for

Equipment 18,184.70 - - 18,184.70

Total accumulated depreciation 18,184.70 - - 18,184.70

Capital assets, net 163,659.46$ 6,244.05$ -$ 169,903.51$

Depreciation is booked at the end of the fiscal year, depreciation expense for the year ended June 30, 2012, was

$18,184.70.

NOTE C – COMPENSATED ABSENCES

Charter School employees may accrue vacation and sick leave based on length of service, subject to certain limitations regarding the amount that will be paid upon termination. The Charter School reports a liability for the accrued leave; however, State appropriations fund only the portion of accrued leave that is used or paid in the current fiscal year. Although the Charter School expects the liability to be funded primarily from future appropriations, generally accepted accounting principles do not permit the recording of a receivable in anticipation of future appropriations. Compensated absences are booked at the end of the fiscal year. At June 30, 2012, the estimated liability for compensated absences, which includes the Charter School’s share of the Florida Retirement System and FICA contributions, totaled $27,401.19. Of this amount, $2,107.79 is estimated to be paid in fiscal year 2012/2013. NOTE D – STATE RETIREMENT PROGRAMS

Florida Retirement System Most employees working in regularly established positions of the College, including the Charter School, are eligible to enroll as members of the state-administered Florida Retirement System (FRS). Provisions are established by Chapters 121 and 122, Florida Statutes; Chapter 112, part IV, Florida Statutes; Chapter 238, Florida Statutes; and Florida Retirement Systems Rules, Chapter 60S, Florida Administrative Code; wherein eligibility, contributions, and benefits are defined and described in detail. FRS is a single retirement system administered by the Department of Management Services, Division of Retirement, and consists of two cost-sharing multiple-employer retirement plans and other nonintegrated programs. These include a defined benefit pension plan (Plan), a Deferred

191




AS OF JULY 31, 2012

7

Retirement Option Program (DROP), and a defined contribution plan, referred to as the Public Employee Optional Retirement Program (PEORP). Employees in the Plan vest at eight years of service. All vested members are eligible for normal retirement benefits at age 62 or at any age after 30 years of service, which may include up to 4 years of credit for military service. The Plan also includes an early retirement provision; however, there is a benefit reduction for each year a member retires before his or her normal retirement date. The Plan provides retirement, disability and death benefits, and annual cost-of living adjustments. DROP, subject to provisions of Section 121.091, Florida Statutes, permits employees eligible for normal retirement under the Plan to defer receipt of monthly benefit payments while continuing employment with an FRS employer. An employee may participate in DROP for a period not to exceed 60 months after electing to participate. During the period of DROP participation, deferred monthly benefits are held in the FRS Trust Fund and accrue interest. As provided in Section 121.4501, Florida Statutes, eligible FRS members may elect to participate in the PEORP in lieu of the FRS defined benefit plan. Employees already participating in the State College System Optional Retirement Program or the DROP are not eligible to participate in this program. Employer contributions are defined by law, but the ultimate benefit depends in part on the performance of investment funds. The PEORP is funded by employer contributions that are based on salary and membership class. Contributions are directed to individual member accounts, and the individual members are allocated contributions and account balances among various approved investment choices. Employees in PEORP vest at one year of service. There were no Charter School employees participating in the PEORP for the month ended July 31, 2012 The State of Florida establishes contribution rates for participating employers. Contribution rates effective July 1, 2011, are presented in the following table:

Class or Plan Percent of Gross SalaryEmployee Employer

(A)

Florida Retirement System, Regular 3.00 5.18Florida Retirement System, Senior Management Service 3.00 6.30Deferred Retirement Option Program - Applicable to Members from All of the Above Classes or Plan 0.00 5.44Florida Retirement System, Reemployed Retiree (B) (B)

Notes: (A)

(B)

Employer rates include 1.11 percent for the postemployment health insurance

subsidy. Also, employer rates, other than for DROP participants, include .03

percent for administrative costs of the Public Employee Optional Retirement

Program.Contribution rates are dependent upon retirement class or plan in which

reemployed.

The Charter School’s liability for participation in the Plan is limited to the payment of the required contributions at

the rates and frequencies established by law on future payrolls of the Charter School. The Charter School’s

contributions to the Plan for the month ended July 31, 2012, were $496.71

192




AS OF JULY 31, 2012

8

Financial statements and other supplementary information of the FRS are included in the state’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, which may be obtained by contacting the State of Florida, Department of Financial Services in Tallahassee, Florida. Also, an annual report on the FRS, which includes its financial statements, required supplementary information, actuarial report, and other relevant information, may be obtained from the State of Florida, Department of Management Services, Division of Retirement in Tallahassee, Florida. State College System Optional Retirement Program Section 1012.875, Florida Statutes, provides for an Optional Retirement Program (Program) for eligible instructors and administrators of the College, including the Charter School. The Program is designed to aid colleges in recruiting employees by offering more portability to employees not expected to remain in the FRS for six or more years. The Program is a defined contribution plan, which provides full and immediate vesting of all contributions submitted to the participating companies on behalf of the participant. Employees in eligible positions can make an irrevocable election to participate in the Program, rather than the FRS, and purchase retirement and death benefits through contracts provided by certain insurance carriers. The College contributes, on behalf of the participant, 10.43 percent of the participant’s salary, less a small amount used to cover administrative costs. The remaining contribution is invested in the company or companies selected by the participant to create a fund for the purchase of annuities at retirement. The participant may contribute, by payroll deduction, an amount not to exceed the percentage contributed by the college to the participant’s annuity account. The Charter School made no contributions to the Plan for the month ended July 31, 2012.

NOTE E – OTHER POST-EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS The College, including the Charter School, follows Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 45, Accounting and Financial Reporting by Employers for Post-employment Benefits Other Than Pensions, for certain other post-employment healthcare and life insurance benefits provided by the Florida College System Risk Management Consortium (Consortium). Plan Description: The Charter School contributes to an agent multiple-employer defined-benefit plan administered by the Consortium. Pursuant to the provisions of Section 112.0801, Florida Statutes, former employees who retire from the Charter School are eligible to participate in the College’s healthcare and life insurance benefits. The Charter School subsidizes the premium rates paid by retirees by allowing them to participate in the plan at reduced or blended group (implicitly subsidized) premium rates for both active and retired employees. These rates provide an implicit subsidy for retirees because, on an actuarial basis, their current and future claims are expected to result in higher costs to the plans on average than those of active employees. The Charter School does not offer any explicit subsidies for retiree coverage. Retirees are required to enroll in the Federal Medicare program for their primary health coverage as soon as they are eligible. Neither the Charter School nor the Consortium issue a stand-alone annual report for the plan and the plan is not included in the annual report of a public employees’ retirement system or another entity. Funding Policy: Plan benefits are pursuant to the provisions of Section 112.0801, Florida Statutes. The Board of Trustees for the College can amend the benefits and contribution rates. The Charter School has not advance- funded or established a funding methodology for the annual other post-employment benefit (OPEB) costs or the net OPEB obligation, and the plans are financed on a pay-as-you-go basis. For the 2011-12 fiscal year, there were no retirees of the Charter School receiving post-employment healthcare or life insurance benefits.

193




AS OF JULY 31, 2012

9

Annual OPEB Cost and Net OPEB Obligation: Annual OPEB cost (expense) is calculated based on the annual required contribution (ARC), an amount actuarially determined in accordance with the parameters of Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 45. The ARC represents a level of funding that if paid on an ongoing basis, is projected to cover normal cost each year and amortize any unfunded actuarial liabilities over a period not to exceed 30 years.

NOTE F – FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF EXPENSES Operating expenses on the statement of revenues, expenses, and changes in net assets are presented in the natural classifications. Presented below are those same expenses shown in functional classification as recommended by the National Association of College and University Business Officers (NACUBO). The functional classification is assigned to a department based on the nature of the activity, which represents the material portion of the activity attributable to the department. Functional classification of expenses for the month ended July 31, 2012, are summarized in the following table:

Functional Classification Amount

Instruction 4,705.00$

Academic support 1,983.60

Institutional support 9,214.67

Total operating expenses 15,903.27$

NOTE G – Risk Management Programs

The College is exposed to various risks of loss related to torts, theft of, damage to, and destruction of assets; errors

and omissions, injuries to employees, and natural disasters. The College provided coverage for these risks

primarily through the Florida College System Risk Management Consortium (Consortium), which was created

under authority of Section 1001.64(27), Florida Statutes, by the boards of trustees of the Florida public colleges for

the purpose of joining a cooperative effort to develop, implement, and participate in a coordinated Statewide

College Risk Management Program: The Consortium is self-sustaining through member assessments (premiums)

and is reinsured through commercial companies for claims in excess of specified amounts. Insurance coverage

obtained through the Consortium included health, life, fire and extended property, general and automobile

liability, workers’ compensation, and other liability coverage. Settled claims resulting from these risks have not

exceeded coverage during this fiscal year. The Charter School, as part of the College, is covered under the

Consortium’s plan.

194




AS OF JULY 31, 2012

10

NOTE H – Litigation

The College is involved in several pending and threatened legal actions. The range of potential loss from all such

claims and actions, as estimated by the College’s legal counsel, should not materially affect the Charter School’s

financial position.

NOTE I – Transportation

The Charter School has an agreement with the School Board of Manatee County, Florida to provide transportation

services to students. The Charter School made no payments to the School Board of Manatee County, Florida for

the month ended July 31, 2012.

NOTE J – Related Parties

The College’s Unexpended Plant Fund is being used to remodel and renovate an existing College classroom

building to be used by the Charter School. In addition, the College’s Auxiliary Fund is being used to supplement

funds for the initial start-up costs and operation of the Charter School, until such time as it becomes self-

supporting. It is the intention of the College to formalize a pay-back plan and/or lease arrangement once the

Charter School is well established. Currently, there is no formal plan in place. For the month ended July 31, 2012

the College did not provide funds for the Charter School. Auxiliary Fund transfers are as follows:

Fiscal Year Amount

2009-10 78,867.51$

2010-11 327,228.22

2011-12 337,213.74

Total Transfers 743,309.47$

195

196

hugginn

Typewritten Text

EXHIBIT O

ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS AND GRANTS

It is respectfully requested the District Board of Trustees of State College of Florida, Manatee-Sarasota accept and approve the following gifts and grants:

DONOR: AMOUNT: TO BE USED FOR:

GIFTS:

GRANTS:

United States Department of Education $221,059.00 Pell Grant Program 2011-2012 Total Received in Gifts

Total Received – Grants for 2011-2012 $221,059.00 August 29, 2012 198

hugginn

Typewritten Text

EXHIBIT P

ACCEPTANCE OF GIFTS AND GRANTS

It is respectfully requested the District Board of Trustees of State College of Florida, Manatee-Sarasota accept and approve the following gifts and grants:

DONOR: AMOUNT: TO BE USED FOR:

GIFTS:

GRANTS:

United States Department of Education $(166,059.00) Pell Grant Program 2011-2012 Total Received in Gifts

Total Received – Grants for 2011-2012 $(166,059.00) August 29, 2012 199

State College of Florida, Manatee-Sarasota Facilities Planning and Management

Board of Trustees Memorandum

To: Board of Trustees

From: Dr. Lars Hafner, President

Prepared by: Ms. Traci Steen, Associate Vice President, Facilities Management

Date: August 29, 2012

Subject: List of Presidential Memos for Change Orders and Guaranteed Maximum Price Contracts under $325,000

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary:

Per SCF Rule 6HX14-6.14 and 6HX14-6.16 the President has the authority to approve Change Orders and Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) construction contracts for amounts less than Category Five as provided for in Section 287.017 F.S.($325,000) The rule also states the Board of Trustees shall be provided a report listing the Change Orders and GMPs approved by the President on a quarterly basis. Dr. Hafner did not approve any Change Orders or GMPs during the second quarter of this year.

200

hugginn

Typewritten Text

EXHIBIT Q

State College of Florida, Manatee-Sarasota Facilities Planning and Management

Board of Trustees Memorandum

To: Board of Trustees

From: Dr. Lars Hafner, President

Prepared by: Ms. Traci Steen, Associate Vice President, Facilities Management

Date: August 29, 2012

Subject: Approval of Recommended Prequalified Construction Contractors

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary:

According to the State Requirements for Educational Facilities (SREF), Section 4.1(7) Boards shall prequalify contractors for a one-(1) year period or for a specific project. SREF requires construction contractors to be prequalified in order for SCF to utilize a sealed bid method of delivery for construction projects. The Contractor Prequalification Committee has reviewed the statements of qualifications that were submitted by contractors who responded to the College’s public announcements requesting them. The following list of contractors has been recommended by the SCF Contractor Prequalification Review Committee. The recommended contactors have been categorized by their bonding capacity and the licenses that they currently hold.

Name of Firm Type of Contractor Bonding Category AD Morgan Corporation Construction Management Category 4 ($0 to $10,000,000 and Above) Ajax Building Corporation Design/Build Category 4 ($0 to $10,000,000 and Above) Allstate Construction, Inc. General Contractor,

Construction Management, Design/Build

Category 4 ($0 to $10,000,000 and Above)

Bay Area Electric Electrical Contractor Category 1 ($0 to $1,000,000) Core Construction Construction Management Category 4 ($0 to $10,000,000 and Above) DeLesline Construction, Inc. General Contractor Category 2 ($0 to $5,000,000) Jon F. Swift General Contractors

General Contractor, Construction Management


Power Contracting Construction Management Category 2 ($0 to $5,000,000) Tandem Construction General Contractor,

Construction Management, Design/Build


Tri-Tech Construction General Contractor Category 1 ($0 to $1,000,000) Willis Smith Construction, Inc.

General Contractor, Construction Management, Design/Build


Approval is sought to accept the recommended Prequalified Construction Contractors for the Period September 1, 2012 to August 31, 2013 as set forth above.

201

hugginn

Typewritten Text

EXHIBIT R

202

hugginn

Typewritten Text

EXHIBIT S

204

hugginn

Typewritten Text

EXHIBIT T