distribution: transonic tunnel...mar 22, 1999  · 1.4.4 model safety report 1.4.5 16-foot tt...

4
DISTRIBUTION: 1p. 2801 Mercer 2801 Koeppel 2801 Kariya 2801 Taylor 2801 Goodman 2801 Byrd 2801 Marks 2801 OSD Technicians TRANSONIC TUNNEL 1 - 1 U.S. Army Aviation & Missile Command - LCPK Missile 16-FOOT TT TEST 516 TUNNEL ENTRY DATE: March 22, 1999 TUNNEL EXIT DATE: April 9. 1999 Approval: (SignatureIDate Lead Test Engineer: NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER

Upload: others

Post on 14-Jul-2020

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: DISTRIBUTION: TRANSONIC TUNNEL...Mar 22, 1999  · 1.4.4 Model Safety Report 1.4.5 16-Foot TT Request for Support 1.4.6 Model Installation Form 1.4.7 Post-test Debriefing 1.4.8 Post-test

DISTRIBUTION: 1p.

2801 Mercer

2801 Koeppel

2801 Kariya

2801 Taylor

2801 Goodman

2801 Byrd

2801 Marks

2801 OSD Technicians

TRANSONIC TUNNEL 1-1

U.S. Army Aviation & Missile Command - LCPK Missile

16-FOOT TT TEST 516

TUNNEL ENTRY DATE: March 22, 1999

TUNNEL EXIT DATE: April 9. 1999

Approval: (SignatureIDate

Lead Test Engineer:

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION LANGLEY RESEARCH CENTER

Page 2: DISTRIBUTION: TRANSONIC TUNNEL...Mar 22, 1999  · 1.4.4 Model Safety Report 1.4.5 16-Foot TT Request for Support 1.4.6 Model Installation Form 1.4.7 Post-test Debriefing 1.4.8 Post-test

1.2 Test Meeting Schedule Meeting Name First Meeting Initial Test Planning Meeting Preliminary Test Plan Review Model Design Reviews Final Test Plan Review Pre-test Meeting Staff Briefing Test Readiness Review In-Test Review End-of Test Staff Debriefing

1 . General Test Information ~ 7 -

1.1 Test Personnel

1.1.1 16-Foot Test Team

Meeting Time hiformal Informal 1/26/99 Informal Informal 2/24/99 Informal 3/22/99 Informal 4/9/99

Name Wes Goodman

Jim Byrd

Lloyd Marks Tim Kariya Andrew B oney Charles Mercer Mike Taylor Gary Koeppel

Meeting # M1 M2 R1 R2 R3 M3 M4 R4 R5 M5

RoleRitle Test Project Engineer

Alt.TestProjectEngineer

Test DirectorIAlt. T.P.E. Data Specialist .

Data Specialist Facility Manager Facility Coordinator Instrumentation Coordinator

1.1.2 Research Team NIA

1.1.3 Other Support Personnel

Telephone (W) 45725 (H) 244-5527 (W)45961 (H) 874-3 104 X43066 X43037 X43034 X43043 X459 13 X44835

ip-

E-mail w.l.goodman@larc

j.e.byrd@larc

1.r.marks @larc t.t.kariya@larc a.d.boney @ l a c c.e.mercer@larc r.m.taylor@larc g.e.koeppel@larc

MIS 280

280

280 280 280 280 280 280

Name Roger Cundiff Greg Humphreys Mark Motter John Casadevall William Salyer (Sal) Jack Hughes Ray Rhew ETTD Cellular

Telephone X47848 X46980 X46978 865-0000 (289) X43526 X44110 X44705 879-5578

RoleRitle Automation control engineer Automation control engineer Automation control engineer Modcomp DAS programmer Photographer supervisor NDE supervisor Balance coordinator Instrumentation

E-mail r.l.cundiff @larc g.l.humphreys@larc m.a.motter@larc NIA w.c.salyer@larc j.t.hughes@larc r.d.rhew @larc

MIS 442 442 442 NIA 425 397 238

Page 3: DISTRIBUTION: TRANSONIC TUNNEL...Mar 22, 1999  · 1.4.4 Model Safety Report 1.4.5 16-Foot TT Request for Support 1.4.6 Model Installation Form 1.4.7 Post-test Debriefing 1.4.8 Post-test

1 . 4 Test Documentation Required ?r 1.4.1 Customer Requirements Form

1.4.2 Test Plan

1.4.3 Model Request Form

1.4.4 Model Safety Report

1.4.5 16-Foot TT Request for Support

1.4.6 Model Installation Form

1.4.7 Post-test Debriefing

1.4.8 Post-test Data Transmittal Letter '

2 . Test Program

2.1 Test Description

2.1 .1 General Test Description 6 Force and Moment test for the MRDEC configuration (LCPK).

Force and Moment test with user provided instrumentation for special data measurements for the Tracor configuration.

2.1.2 Specific Test Objectives Data to select the proper' canard design Confirm pitch, yaw & roll control with spinning tails Build up data to evaluate canard downwash effect on tails Confirm superposition approach for aerodynamic modeling Identify proper aerodynamic variables for documentary test in June Evaluate potential for sting-model grounding in documentary test in June Confirm the functionality and durability of the spinning tail section

anard roll control valuate requirement for spinning tail Canard selection Determine optimum canard span

anard location xamine stability and contr Nose shapes Evaluate drag of alternative nose shapes

uate aerodynamic modeling of co controls at arbitrary roll angles

Out-of-plane forces Evaluate yawing moment due to roll control canarddownwash Evaluate effect on free spinning vs. locked

tail

Fixed strakes on nose Tailoring missile stability

Page 4: DISTRIBUTION: TRANSONIC TUNNEL...Mar 22, 1999  · 1.4.4 Model Safety Report 1.4.5 16-Foot TT Request for Support 1.4.6 Model Installation Form 1.4.7 Post-test Debriefing 1.4.8 Post-test

3 . Model < 3 .1 Model Description

Stinger

3.1.1 Brief Model Description Long slender missiles with canard controls and spinning tail sections.

T.S. T.S. T.S. T.S. T.S.

3.1.2 General Model Geometnr orcelmoment (stability and

1559.0

M.S. 72.0

, 11 392 2 5 608 -

1635.0

M.S. 1.0

_I 2 00,

1600.0

. 35 00 -

3.1 .3 Model ConfiguratiodGeometric Variables Three basic models; Marconi (TRACOR) Two spinning tail sections; locked or free to spin.

LCPK

Model Total lengthk67.5

Remotely operated canards. LCPK Spinning tail section; locked or free to spin.

1647.0

- 3 1 15 - - 25 10 - Aft Pos~tion

u 1 n

scale:FULL ' I

1 1, 72, & 1 Body Diaj2.75 in I

Three nose shapes. Two sets of canards with settings for Pitch, Yaw, & Roll. Two placements for the canards Stinger Spinning tail section; locked or free to spin. Three nose shapes.

1 703.28

U UI

Macon1

675 11

Two sets of canards.

3.1.4 Special Model Requirements/Characteristics Fluid filled tubes for high speed pressure readings. Remotely movable canards on TRACOR model.

3.1 .5 Model Surface Geometry Definition NI A

Transition Location and Type Description