distribution of trace and major elements in sediment and
TRANSCRIPT
ELSIZVIER Marine Chemistry 53 (1996) 285-299
Distribution of trace and major elements in sediment and pore waters of the Lena Delta and Laptev Sea
Rob F. Nolting, Maarten van Dalen, Willem Helder
Netherlunds Institute for Sea Research, P.0. Box 59. 1790 AB Den Burg, Texel, The Netherlands
Received 25 May 1994: accepted 5 January 1995
Abstract
Sediment cores collected during the SPASIBA expedition in 1991 were analysed for their trace- and major element concentrations. Leachable (0.1 N HCI) as well as residual concentrations were determined. Fe and Mn were measured in the interstitial waters to characterize redox conditions. Lateral dis~bution patterns of solid phase Cu, Cd, Ni, Pb and Zn show a
small increase in concentration from the Lena Delta in seaward direction. In general concentrations of these metals are very low and similar to natural background values. With some exceptions, solid phase profiles with depth of all investigated elements do not show strong variations. No enrichment of Pb and Zn in surface layers was found. Remobilization processes
and transport of particles enriched in Mn are responsible for Mn accumulation in a particular area. Pore-water concentrations of dissolved Mn in the latter sediments are very high (> 700 FM) and suggest strong Mn reduction directly below the sediment-water interface. In contrast to Mn, the depth profiles of Cd show a surface layer with lower concentrations and an
increase deeper down the sediment. The C/N ratio in the sediment decreases from 13 in the Lena mouth to 9 in the more marine part of the Laptev Sea. Surface sediments in the Laptev Sea are very uniform and homogeneous and show only small
concentration gradients.
1. Introduction
While other large rivers and the adjacent coastal systems have been extensively studied for their geo-
chemistry and sedimentoiogy fe.g Mississippi: Trefry et al.. 1985; Wright and Coleman, 1974; Amazon: Eisma et al., 1991; Zaire River: Jansen and Van der Gaast, 1988; Yellow River: Wright, 1989) this is not the case for the River Lena. The Lena River belongs,
however. together with the Yenissei River to the two
largest rivers discharging into the Arctic Ocean and is the eighth largest in the world with a water
discharge of 525 km” yr- ’ . Its yearly solid discharge to, mainly the Laptev Sea, is estimated 17.6 X IO6
ton yr -I (Gordeev and Sidorov, 19931, with a large
monthly variation. The water discharge can be 60
times higher in June than in April (Letoile et al.,
1993). This scarcity of investigations on sediments of the
Lena River and adjacent estuary is mainly due to the rather harsh weather conditions and logistical diffi-
culties. Access to the Lena River and adjacent Laptev Sea is only possible in the months of August and September.
Due to the fact that the Lena River belongs to the largest river systems in the world and is situated in an almost pristine environment, it is interesting to compare this system with other anthropogenically influenced ones. In 1989 a first survey in the Lena delta and Laptev Sea was unde~aken in the frame-
0304-4203/96/$15.00 Q 1996 El. sevier Science B.V. All rights reserved
SSDI 0304-4203(95)00095-x
286 R. F. Nolting et cd. / Morinr Chemistyv 53 (1996l 285-299
work of the Scientific Programme on Arctic and
Siberian Aquatorium (SPASIBA), and part of this work was published before (Church and Windom, 1993). A second expedition was carried out in September 199 1. While the first expedition was lim-
ited to studies in the overlying water, the second one
was of a more ambitious type. Not only the water
column was investigated, but a large part of the research was focused on sediment studies.
The purpose of the investigations on sediments
and pore water was to study diagenetic behaviour of metals, to determine concentration levels and distri- bution patterns of trace metals and major elements, and to study the influence of suspended particulate
matter @PM) supplied by the Lena River to the adjacent Laptev Sea. To fulfil this goal the lateral
distribution as well as depth distribution patterns of
trace- and major elements are presented. A complete data set of this research is available
on request (Van Dalen and Nolting, 1992).
I .27 I
125 135
2. Sampling and analysis
Sediment samples were collected with a boxcorer
in the Laptev Sea (stations C20-C38) and with a small grab in the Lena River and estuary (stations l-27) in September 199 1. Station numbers and posi-
tions are given in Fig. 1. Station 1 is situated in the
upstream part of the Lena River. For the river and
estuarine survey the Ulkhon, a small tugboat, and for the Laptev Sea the R.V. Jacob Smirnitski, were
used. The boxcorer of Russian design was rectangu- lar (30 X 40 cm), about 2 m long, with two dis-
mountable panels at one side. Depending on the depth of penetration in the sediment, the upper or lower panel was opened. Due to this design, it was
not possible to sample overlying water and some- times the uppermost sediment layer (1 cm) was
slightly disturbed. Depending on penetration depths of the corer three subsamples of maximum 14-cm
length were taken from the box by inserting transpar-
12E030’ 129O 129O30’
72’
Fig. 1. Map with station numbers and sampling positions in the Laptev Sea boxcore stations C20-C38 (A) and in the Lena estuary (grab samples) (B). The enlarged map of the Lena estuary is indicated as rectangle in chart A.
R. F. Noltin~ et crl. /Marine Chemists 53 (I 9%) 285-294, 287
ent pvc liners (6 cm diameter) into the sediment.
Sometimes it was not possible to collect cores of this length, but shorter ones (10 cm) were sampled. Subcores were closed with rubber stoppers. Directly after subsampling, the cores were divided into ten
slices which progressively increase from 0.5 cm at the top to 4 cm at the bottom of the core (Nolting
and Helder. 1991: Nolting and Van Hoogstraten, 1992). Slices from the same depth were combined in
clean Teflon squeezers (Reeburgh, 1967) and pore water was removed from the sediment by squeezing the sediment over a 0.2 pm cellulose-acetate filter
under nitrogen pressure (l-3.5 bar) and collected in small Teflon vials. The slicing procedure took only 5
min after which the samples were directly stored
under nitrogen gas. In our experience this procedure, in which the core slices are exposed to air during a
short period (max. 5 min), has only minor effects on pore-water profiles of Fe’+ and phosphate. There-
fore the profiles of Fe’+ (Fig. 5) should be inter- preted with some care (see also Discussion). After squeezing, pore waters were acidified to pH 2 with
HCI I2 N (Suprapur, Merck). Sediment slices were packed in plastic bags and stored in a refrigerator.
Additionally, suspended particulate matter @PM)
was collected by pumping water over a filter (Nucleopore 0.45 pm>.
Trace and major elements in the sediments were sequentially determined after leaching during I8 h
with 0.1 N HCI (Duinker and Nolting, 1976) and in the residual fraction after treatment with HF/Aqua
Regia (Rantala and Loring, 1977). The 0.1 N HCI leachate contains the “easy exchangeable” metal fraction. Duinker et al. (I 974). This method is regu- larly checked at our laboratory with reference sam-
ples. and a loss of approximately 6% was found by summing up the leachable and residual fraction com-
pared to the total destruction (Van Hoogstraten and Nolting. 199 I ; Happee and Nolting, 1994). In the
SPM only the total element concentrations were determined. Copper, cadmium, lead and nickel were determined by graphite-furnace atomic absorption
spectrometry (GFAAS; Perkin Elmer, 5100; Zee- man> with the stabilized temperature platform fur- nace (STPF) technique. All other elements were determined by flame AAS (Perkin Elmer 2380). The precision of the method was checked by analysing a representative sample five times, for the leachable as
Table I
Results of five-fold analyses of a representative sample. Presented
are mean concentrations and standard deviation from the leachable
and the residual fraction, Total. represents the summation of the
individual leachable and residual results of each sub-sample
Element Leachable Residual Total
(n=5) (n=5) (n=S)
Cd rig/g 1Ok8 41*s so+ I3
Cu pg/g 4.37 kO.40 4.62 10.24 8.99 f 0.63
Pb pg/g 5.3 I i 0.3 I 9.60 + 0.47 14.90+0.46
Ni Kg/g 2.35 i 0. I I 9.54 -+ 0.33 11.89~0.31
Mn I*g/g 34*3 14l*l2 175ill
Zn pg/g (n.d.)’ (n.d.) (n.d.)
Fe 8 0.35 + 0.01 1.63 f 0.05 I .98 + 0.06
Mg % 0.078 + 0.004 0.42 5 0.01 0.50 + 0.01
Al % 0.085 &O.OOl 5.2 I * 0.22 5.3OkO.22
Ca c7r 0.093 i 0.003 0.40 + 0.06 0.49 + 0.05
Si c?c (n.d.) 32.9 f I .6 32.9 & I .6
’ n.d. = not determined.
well as for the residual fraction. These results, and the standard deviation of all elements investigated in
the two fractions, are presented in Table 1. As a control for the accuracy of our procedure reference
sediments, supplied by the EC Bureau of References (BCR 320 and BCR 1421, were included during the whole analytical procedure. For all elements investi-
gated the measured and certified values were in good
Table 2
Concentration of trace elements and major elements as their
oxides in reference material BCR no. 320 (river sediment) and
BCR no. 142 (light sandy soil). Presented are the results deter-
mined with our method and those reported by the BCR (Brussels).
certified and 95% confidence interval. Concentrations between
brackets are reported but not certified by the BCR (Griepink and
Muntau, 1988)
BCR no. 320
Determined Certified
BCR no. 142
Determined Certified
Cd kg/g 0.441
cu pg/g 41.1
Pb cLg/g 38.4
Ni kg/g 70.8
Mn pg/g 803
Zn kg/g 154 FelO, c/r 6.56
MgO % 3.4s
Al,O, % IS.52
CaO % 2.54
SiO? % 62.13
0.533 + 0.026 0.25
44. I + I .o 24.9
42.3 k I .6 34.7
15.2 f I .4 30.6
(78216) 571
142k3 95.1
(6.41 *O.lO) 3.05
(3.24rtrO.05) 1.13
(15.72iO.47) 8.61
(2.35+O.l I) 4.67
(59.60* I .97) 69.01
0.25 f 0.09
27.5 1-0.6
37.81 I.9
29.2 * 2.5
(569 + 26)
92.414.4
(2.80) (1.09)
(9.48)
(4.94)
(68.22)
288 R.F. Nolring et al. /Marine Chemist? 53 f IYWI 285%2YY
40
35
30
g 25
iijm
15
10
5 Si (%) = 42.4 - 2.2 Al (%) R = 0.77
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 6 9 10
Al (W
Fig. 2. Relation between silicium and aluminium in all sediment
samples from the Laptev Sea.
agreement (Table 2). Blanks were for most elements negligible and, when appropriate, corrected for.
Zinc, iron and manganese in pore water were determined by flame AAS by directly aspirating the
solution into the flame. Concentrations were mea- sured against standards and compared with standard
addition measurements.
Organic carbon and total nitrogen were deter- mined with a Carlo-Erba NA 1500 CHNS analyser
according to Verardo et al. (1990). Total element concentrations of all sediment sam-
ples and Fe, Mn and Zn concentrations in pore waters are given in Appendix A.
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Stud?; site
The Laptev Sea is a shallow marginal sea with
water depths ranging from 10 m near the delta (Tiksi) to 60 m at 77”N (Fig. 11. Some shallow parts are present in the middle of the research area where the water depth is not more than 5-6 m. In a north-east direction water depth increases to > 30
m in the vicinity of Kotelny Island (stations C25.
C27 and C28). In the Laptev Sea high turbid surface waters, up
to more than 400 km from the river delta, are observable. Between 10 and 20 m turbidity is low and the most turbid water is found near the bottom
due to resuspension of bottom sediments, creating a three layer stratification (Burenkov, 1992, Cruise Report Spasiba Expedition). The influence of the
solid discharge by the Lena River has a maximal
spreading in eastern direction. Also the bottom salin- ity distribution (Cauwet and Sidorov, 1996-this is-
sue) suggests a bottom current direction in east-
north-east direction.
3.2. Distribution in sur$ace sediments
3.2. I. Major elements
The calcium carbonate content in sediments from
the Laptev Sea is around I%, so there was no need to express the trace metal concentrations on a cal- cium carbonate free basis. The mean major element
composition and variability (+ 1 s.d) expressed as their oxides and calcium carbonate (a) in the surface
sediments are, CaCO, 1.21 _t 0.73, MgO 1.83 _t
0.63, Fe,O, 5.34 + 1.97, Al,O, 12.41 & 1.75 and SiOz 60.54 & 6.28. It shows that the sediment is of
the siliceous type. The sum of the oxides. CaCO,, MgO, Fe,O,, Al,O, and SiO? is around 85% in the whole area. The correlation between Si and Al (Fig. 2) indicates that the sediment in the Lena estuary and Laptev Sea is a mixture of fine-grained clay minerals
and quartz. Fine-grained, carbonate free, sediments
have a Si/Al ratio of 2.4 (Krauskopf, 1965). deep sea clay of 2.9 and river particulate material 3.0 (Martin and Whitfield, 1983). In siliceous sediments
this ratio is 5 or higher. The Si/Al ratio in Lena and Laptev Sea sediments range from 3.3 to 14.0 with the highest ratios in the delta.
Sedimentation rate determinations from ““Pb profiles (J. Kalf and D. Eisma, personal communica- tion; Eisma et al., 19891 indicate very irregular ““Pb patterns, which did not allow to estimate sedimenta-
Fig. 3. Distribution pattern of Cu. Cd, Ni. Pb. Zn (kg g- ’ ) and C/N ratio in the upper surface (O-2 cm) layer of sediments from the Laptev
Sea.
R.F. Nolting et al./Marine Chemist? 53 11996) 285-299
1 Laotev Se0
I-- - 4
Laptev Sea
290 R.F. Nolting et al. /Marine Chemistrv 53 (1996) 285-299
13!Y
Loptev Sea
Fig. 4. Distribution pattern of Mn (kg g- ’ ) in the upper surface
(O-2 cm) layer of sediments from the Laptev Sea.
tion rates, but are indicative for considerable rework- ing and mixing.
3.2.2. Trace elements
The distribution in surface sediments of total Cu,
Ni, Cd, Pb and Zn (pg g-‘) and the C/N ratio in
the upper 2 cm of the sediment is given in Fig. 3. Concentration gradients for all elements are rather
small. For Cu lowest values are found in the river dominated area, with a gradual increase in seaward
direction. For all other metals river dominated sedi- ments have relatively high concentrations. Further offshore a minimum concentration area can be de- tected for all metals, apart from Cu, while more
offshore concentrations increase again. A similar distribution pattern for those metals in SPM from the
Lena River was reported by Martin et al. (1993). These phenomena can be explained by a particle size effect, induced by mixing of coarse river material with marine derived organic material (Duinker and
Nolting, 1976; Nolting and Eisma, 1988; Nolting et al., 1990). Apart from this, bottom currents as indi- cated by the bottom salinity distribution (Cauwet and
Sidorov, 1996-this issue) and sediment transport (Burenkov, 1992, Cruise Report Spasiba Expedition),
can explain the observed distribution patterns of Cu,
Ni, Pb, Cd and Zn. The concentrations of trace metals and the ele-
ment/Al ratio in SPM, calculated with the data reported by Martin et al. (1993) and this study, are
almost similar to those in the sediment, Ni/Al (3-4 x 10p3), Pb/Al(2-3 x 10-4), Cd/Al (0.1-0.25 x lo-‘), Fe/Al (0.4-0.61, Cu/Al (0.5-2.5 X lo-‘)
and Zn/Al (5- 19 X lo-” 1. It indicates that SPM supplied to sediments in the Laptev Sea does not
change remarkably with respect to its trace metal content, or that trace metals are not released from the
suspended matter. The Fe/Al ratio (0.4-0.6) is in-
termediate between river SPM (0.4) and shore mud (0.8) (Martin and Whitfield, 1983) but similar to
those reported for fine-grained carbonate free bottom sediments (0.4) (Krauskopf, 1965).
Concentrations of all the investigated metals are similar to those reported for unpolluted continental soils and near shore mud (Chester, 1990), indicating
that trace metal levels in sediments supplied by the Lena River to the Laptev Sea are natural background
values. Based on the element/Al ratio, concentra- tions of Cu, Zn, Ni and Pb are for instance a factor
of 2-3 lower than those found in recent sediments in the Rh8ne delta. For Cd this factor is 10 (Nolting
and Van Hoogstraten, 1993). The distribution of Mn in surface sediment is
shown in Fig. 4. It shows a strong increase from
1000 CLg g ’ in the delta to more than 5000 pg g-I in east north-eastern direction. Although the distribu- tion pattern of Mn can be explained in the same way
as for the other metals, a more detailed discussion will be given in the next chapter.
The C/N ratio (Fig. 31 shows a clear decrease from a value of 13 in the river mouth to 9 in the more northern part of the Laptev Sea. When the C/N ratio is used to discriminate the contribution of
Fig. 5. Depth profiles of residual n and total Fe 0 (7%) and Mn (p,g g- ’ ) and interstitial water concentration 0 (PM) at boxcore stations
C20, C21, C25 and C28.
291
292 R. F. No/ring et al. /Marine Chemisrq 53 (I 996128.5299
marine derived organic carbon fraction from the terrestrial one, using the following end-member com-
positions: terrestrial C/N = N 90 (Macdonald et al., 1991) and marine C/N = N 6.2, we calculate that 60% of the organic carbon in the sediment of the
river mouth is from terrestrial origin while in the
more marine part this fraction accounts for 35%. Cauwet and Sidorov (1996-this issue) measured par- ticulate organic carbon (POC) concentrations in SPM
in the lower reaches of the Lena River, and found 3.1-4.3% organic C. These values are somewhat higher than the organic carbon concentrations found
in surface sediments of the Laptev Sea.
3.3. Depth distribution in sediment
3.3.1. Major elements
Vertical profiles of Ca, Mg, Al and Si do not
show much variation with depth, only occasionally some differences occur where sand layers are present (data in Appendix A). The lowest Ca concentrations are found in the deeper parts of the Laptev Sea. Based on the lateral and depth distribution of the
major elements, it can be concluded that the top sediment layer in the Laptev Sea is very uniform and homogeneous. This is probably a result of resuspen-
sion and mixing of sediment. During high discharge
(June-August) 96% of the yearly TSM is exported
to the Laptev Sea (LCtoile et al., 1993; Cauwet and Sidorov, 1996-this issue). During these periodic events a huge amount of TSM is spread out on the bottom of the Laptev Sea and mixes with the previ-
ously deposited sediments, a process repeated each year, preventing a regular sedimentation. Serova and Gorbunova (pers. commun.) state that the dominant physical weathering in the basin defines the input of
fresh material to the sea in which unchanged rock grains from the continent are abundant.
In contrast to the earlier described elements, Mn and Fe show a more interesting behaviour. As al- ready described, the lateral distribution in surface sediment of solid Mn shows an increase from 1000
pg g ’ in the mouth of the river to > 5000 pg g- ’ in the eastern part of the Laptev Sea. By closer inspection of the depth profiles of total and residual solid Mn and interstitial water Mt-?+, we can try to explain these increases. In Fig. 5 some characteristic profiles of Mn and Fe are shown. As example the
stations C20 close to the river and C28 near Kotelny Island are discussed. At station C20 the Mn*+ con-
centration increases from 0 p,M at the sediment-
water interface to a concentration of 300 p,M at 9 cm depth. The solid phase Mn shows a strong increase
in the exchangeable fraction in the upper 2 cm due to
reoxidation of upward diffusing Mn’+. Down core the ratio between residual and total Mn stays con- stant (0.51). In contrast to this, the Mn2+ concentra-
tion at station C28 is already high (700 p_M) at the sediment-water interface and stays relatively con- stant down core. This high Mn*+ concentration indi-
cates strong reducing conditions and an exchange of Mn2+ to the overlying water column (slow oxidation
kinetics) where it can be oxidized again and de- posited as Mn-ox. The high solid phase Mn concen-
tration at this station is mostly in the exchangeable fraction through the whole core and indicative for
Mn recycling processes and Mn accumulation. The
ratio between residual and total Mn in this core is 0.10, indicating that 90% of Mn in the sub-surface layer is in the exchangeable fraction compared to 50% at station C20. These observations are in accor- dance with a system in which Mn enriched particles are transported from the shallow coastal area to the
central part of the Laptev Sea. The bottom current direction and the existence of a nepheloid layer near
the bottom (Burenkov, 1992, Cruise Report Spasiba Expedition; LCtoile et al., 1993) support this observa-
tion and explains the existence of the area covered by stations C25, C27 and C28 where increased Mn concentrations are present.
Mn recycling processes are well described for other coastal sediments and representative for areas
with a high organic C input (Sundby et al., 1981; Sundby and Silverberg, 1985; Nolting and Eisma, 1988; Helder, 1989). Manganese fluxes from conti-
nental margin sediments were recently measured by Johnson et al. (1992). The highest fluxes they ob-
served were on the shallow continental shelf, in accordance with our observations.
Dissolved Fe profiles follow the normal pattern in
which dissolution of Fe-oxides takes place below that of Mn (Fig. 5). For station C20 this increase of Fe’+ starts at 2 cm, well below the zone where MnO, precipitates, and increases down the sediment to 300 p,M at 9 cm. Upward diffusion of dissolved Fe results in FeO, precipitation, indicated by a small
R. F. Ndting et al. /Marine Chemistryc 53 (1996) 285-299 293
band of higher leachable Fe content at around 2 cm.
This is well below the zone where MnO, precipita- tion is observed. At station C28 a strong dissolution of Fe starts at 2 cm to a maximum of 60 pM and stays rather constant deeper down the sediment.
3.3.2. Truce elements
In most sediment cores, concentration-depth pro- files of Cu, Pb, Cd, Ni and Zn do not show much variation. They mostly reflect the concentrations given by the surface distribution pattern. For stations
C2 1, C28 and C36 depth profiles of Cu, Pb, Cd and Zn are shown in Fig. 6. The enrichment of Zn, Pb
and, in some cases, Cu to the surface layer as observed in many coastal areas around the world
(Bruland et al., 1974; Gobeil and Silverberg, 1989;
Macdonald et al., 1991; Nolting and Helder, 1991; Nolting and Van Hoogstraten, 1992; and many oth-
ers) is not observed here. Only Pb, Zn and Cd show in some profiles a small gradient and those cores are
described below. At stations C25, C27 (not shown) and C28 the
profiles of the residual Pb content show an increase to the surface of the sediment while the total concen-
tration remains constant (Fig. 6). These stations are
situated in the area where the high Mn concentra- tions are found. Indeed, the strong increase in the residual Pb fraction to the surface coincides with that of Mn. This suggests that Pb is subject to diagenetic changes and redox processes controlled by Mn. Gob- eil and Silverberg (1989) demonstrated that Pb is
subject to early diagenetic processes in Laurentian Trough sediments, redox-controlled by cycles of Fe diagenesis. Unfortunately we have no pore-water data for Pb, but the decrease of the leachable Pb fraction to the surface in core C28 is similar to the
decrease of extractable Pb observed by Gobeil and Silverberg (1989) in their profiles. The low and
constant Pb concentrations indicate that anthro- pogenic inputs are of minor importance, this in
contrast to other areas around the world. Only at station C27 zinc profiles (not shown)
show a small increase in concentration to the sedi- ment surface, in the residual fraction as well as in the leachable one. This can be a particle size effect or accumulation by manganese (hydroxy-oxide) precipi-
tation. Although Cd concentrations are very low in the
Fig. 6. Depth profiles of residual Cu 0, Pb n and total Cu 0, Pb •1 (&g g-’ ) (A) and residual Zn n and total Zn 0 (&g g-’ ) and
residual Cd 0 and total Cd 0. (ng g-’ ) (B) at stations C21, C28 and C36.
294 R. F. Nolting et al. / Marine Chemistry 53 (1996) 285-299
sediments ( < 100 ng g - ’ 1, some trends can be ob- served. At most stations the Cd concentration in- creases with depth (Fig. 6). Both the leachable and residual fractions account for this increase, but the leachable fraction contributes most. Gobeil et al. (1987) described the relatively complex behaviour of
Cd during early diagenesis in Laurentian Trough sediments. The processes they describe can also explain the observed Cd distribution in Laptev Sea
sediments. Cadmium is released from the sediment in the oxygenated zone due to the degradation of
fresh organic matter and dissolves. Due to downward
diffusion dissolved Cd precipitates, probably as a sulfide phase (Gobeil et al., 1987) below the oxy- genated zone, and total Cd content increases.
Station C36 close to the Lena mouth (Fig. 6) is an example of a depth profile where different sediment
layers are present. The strong minimum in trace metal concentrations at 7 cm depth is correlated with
an increase of silicate from 52% at the top to 60% at 7 cm. At the same depth the Al content decreases
from 7% to 5.5%. It indicates that we are dealing with a sub-surface sandy layer covered with a sedi-
ment layer characteristic for the whole area. The sandy layer seems to be specific for this part of the
Laptev Sea, because at station C38 close to station C36 no boxcore sample could be obtained due to the presence of a very hard sandy layer. Another indica- tion that this observation can be described by a
physical phenomenon and not by chemical processes is shown by the good correlation that exist between leachable Cu, Pb and total Al (Fig. 7). Higher con-
centrations of Cu and Pb are correlating with higher Al contents (more clay minerals) and, by dilution
4- 0
0
2-
0 5
l cu Lolglg)
C36 0 Pb L(w’~I)
I 1 6 7
Al T (%)
Fig. 7. Relation of leachable copper and lead (Fg g-‘) against
aluminium (9) in core C36.
with sand both concentrations decrease. This sup- ports the well known relation of trace metals with
clay minerals.
3.4. Suspended particulate matter
Concentrations of all investigated elements in SPM collected in the estuarine part of the Lena river are given in Table 3. They are in good agreement
with the values given by Martin et al. (1993) for the same area and belong to the lowest concentrations reported for major world rivers. Martin et al. (1993) described the distribution of Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn in relation to Al and POC. Here we present the Cu, Zn,
Fe, Al and Mn concentrations in SPM in relation to
Table 3
Concentration of trace and major elements in suspended matter collected in the estuary of the Lena River (n.d.: not detected)
Station Depth Salinity Cu Cd Ni
(I*g/g) PcLhg/g) (kg/g) ol.g/g)
Zn Mn Ca Mg Fe Al Si
no. (m) (%0) (kg/g) &g/g) (BE) (%o) (%) (%I (%)
1 3 0 26 31 0.14 24 180 840 0.9 0.9 3.3 4.5 23 1 18 0 39 37 I .42 31 217 1234 0.8 1.4 4.9 6.3 34 9 3 0.25 56 45 1.3 80 216 1295 0.9 1.2 5.2 6.2 34
13 3 2.2 90 396 2.47 47 479 1034 0.8 I.1 4.8 5.7 39 15 6.5 3.7 117 239 6.17 24 1982 3183 0.9 0.8 5.6 4.1 63 16 3 0.06 48 59 1.29 25 156 526 0.7 1.4 6.2 7.2 45
23 3 0.8 40 31 0.66 44 156 966 1.2 1.4 4.6 6 32 25 3 2.26 219 29 0.24 17 72 0.5 0.9 3.3 4.8 44
R. F. Nolting rt al. /Marine Chemistp 53 f 1996) 285-299 295
2500 6
2000-
5 1500 D
s
iz IOOO-
i
00. I 0 1 2 3 4 0 1 2 3 4
salinity (% 0 ) salinity (% 0 )
250
200
150 G 3 2
100 :
50
0
Fig. 8. Correlation of Al 0 (81, Fe l (%) and Mn W (pg g-’ ) (left), and Cu 0 and Zn H (kg g-’ ) (right) in suspended matter (SPM)
with salinity in the estuarine part of the Lena River.
salinity (Fig. 8). Concentrations of Fe and Al are rather constant over the small salinity range. On the
other hand the Mn concentration seems to increase with higher salinity. This increase is not surprising,
taken into account the involvement of Mn in the earlier described redox processes that occur in the
sediment. Cu and Zn both show an increase in concentration
from the river to the sea. For Cu this pattern is comparable with that presented by Martin et al.
(1993). However, these authors did not find the high
Table 4
Annual supply of different elements in suspension by the Lena,
RhBne and Rhine rivers. (Rhine: Salomons and Eysink, 1981;
RhGne: Martin et al., 1989; Guieu et al., 1991)
Element
Solid discharge
CU
Pb
Cd
Ni Zn
Mn
Al
Fe
SUPP’Y SUPP’Y ton/year ton/year
Lena river Rhane
17.6~ 10” 4.6~ 10h
460 212
616 446
23 7
422 236
3,168 1,013
14,080 4,273
790,000 318,320
580,000 197,800
SUPPlY ton/year
Rhine river
3.4x IO6
884
1,547
120
391
4,845
Zn concentrations, but it supports their explanation
that Cu-poor river material mixes with Cu-rich ma- rine organic material. However, our limited data set
does not allow to draw significant conclusions.
The annual solid phase discharge of Cu, Pb, Cd, Ni and Zn is low compared to rivers under more
human impact. In Table 4 a comparison with the anthropogenically influenced Rhine and Rh6ne rivers,
for these elements and for Mn, Al and Fe is given. It shows that the supply of trace elements by the Lena River with a high solid discharge is much lower
compared to the Rh6ne and Rhine River with a much lower solid phase discharge.
4. Conclusions
Trace metal concentrations in sediments from the
Laptev Sea are very low and resemble natural back- ground concentrations. Distribution patterns of solid phase Cd, Ni, Cu, Pb and Zn in sediments from the
Laptev Sea, show small increases in concentration from the Lena Delta seaward due to their accumula- tion in fresh marine organic material. Although, the Cd concentrations are very low compared to other coastal environments, its increase is more pro- nounced than that of the other metals. Mn concentra-
296 R. F. Nolting et al. /Marine Chemistry 53 (I 996) 285-299
tions in the deeper part of the Laptev Sea are higher than those near the river mouth. Remobilization pro-
cesses of Mn and lateral transport of Mn enriched particles from the coastal zone can explain this.
Sediments in the Laptev Sea are of the siliceous
type with low CaCO, concentrations ( N 1%). C/N ratios show that 58% of the organic carbon
in sediment of the river mouth is terrestrial. In the more marine part this content decreases to 36%.
Profiles of solid Cu, Pb, Cd, Ni, Zn and the major elements in sediments from the Laptev Sea do not
show much variation with depth and are indicative
for a rather homogeneous surface sediment. The annual solid discharge of Cu, Pb, Cd, Ni and
Zn by the Lena River is low, compared to rivers
under anthropogenic influences.
Acknowledgements
The Netherlands Marine Research Foundation (SOZ) is acknowledged for the financial support. Rikus Kloosterhuis is thanked for the carbon and nitrogen determinations. The whole group from Rus-
sia, France, Finland, Norway, and the Netherlands is very much thanked for the exciting time we had together. Jean-Marie Martin, the initiator of this
expedition, and Julia Protkova and Artyom Zubkov
did a great job in logistics under very difficult
circumstances. Igor Sidorov is thanked for his sup- port in Tiksi. Remarks by Geert-Jan Brummer im-
proved the manuscript. We are very grateful for the comments of three anonymous referees.
Appendix A. Trace- and major elements results (pg/g and %) in sediments and in pore-water (PM) from the Lena River and Laptev Sea
Boxcore Depth Cu Pb Cd Ni Zn Zn Mn Mn Fe Fe Al Si Mg Ca
(cm) pg/g kg/g rig/g pg/g I*g/g pM kg/g FM % p,M% % % %
c20 0.25 19 21 34 32 108 0.75 19 22 93 32 107 1.25 18 21 73 31 105 1.75 18 22 19 31 104 2.50 19 22 73 32 105 3.50 19 21 136 32 107 5.00 19 22 44 32 107 7.00 19 21 111 31 108 9.00 19 22 106 33 111
c21 0.25 18 16 34 30 100 0.75 18 17 44 31 101 1.25 18 17 110 30 99 1.75 18 17 24 30 102 2.50 18 17 38 30 101 3.50 19 17 58 31 101 5.00 19 17 58 31 106 7.00 19 17 93 31 106
C23 8 14 66 16 56 C24 10 12 53 18 69
c25 0.25 2.1 22 49 33 120 0.75 21 23 173 35 118 1.25 20 22 24 32 120
2.96 2766 0 4.74 3 7.62 27.1 1.37 0.36
7.30 2157 35 4.81 5 7.13 27.1 1.38 0.32 1.68 1373 52 4.84 3 7.37 27.2 1.37 0.35
3.81 873 119 4.90 5 7.22 27.2 1.37 0.38
2.37 752 129 4.92 6 7.28 27.5 1.36 0.33
1.55 618 154 4.70 24 7.28 26.8 1.89 631 174 4.70 50 7.37 26.8
0.79 622 227 4.68 82 7.38 27.0 1.20 596 283 4.65 290 7.33 27.2
1.07 870 74 4.22 4 6.63 26.6 1.68 1159 154 4.32 7 6.58 26.4
1.07 700 108 4.22 4 6.79 26.9 2.44 592 164 4.11 9 6.79 27.4 2.85 486 178 4.14 44 6.75 27.6 0.79 434 143 4.04 54 6.60 27.0 0.79 400 105 4.07 112 7.01 27.9
1
1
.37 0.29
.40 0.28
.36 0.28
.62 0.29
.43 0.98
.40 0.65
.42 0.87
.41 0.64
.41 0.61
.40 0.62
.45 0.51 0.86 411 101 4.03 94 6.82 27.1 1.43 0.63
187 1.92 5.04 32.6 0.54 0.31 272 2.43 5.69 31.8 0.65 0.19
0.58 4921 0 4.98 3 7.63 24.7 1.27 0.26 1.79 4232 6 5.21 3 7.58 25.2 1.32 0.26 0.31 2959 156 5.16 5 7.69 27.7 1.41 01.30
R. F. Nolting et al. /Marine Chemistry 53 (1996) 285-299 297
1.75 19 21 88 31 113 0.58 2960 253 4.91 3 6.85 26.1 1.28 0.36 2.50 20 23 29 33 116 0.51 3330 595 5.20 3 7.20 26.3 1.32 0.28 3.50 20 23 96 33 118 0.24 4154 813 5.20 3 6.99 26.4 1.32 0.25 5.00 19 21 85 30 109 0.04 2409 852 4.73 3 7.06 29.2 1.21 0.29 7.00 20 21 68 32 116 0.78 1923 892 4.97 3 7.18 26.7 1.33 0.34 9.00 20 21 57 32 117 0.44 2246 862 5.05 13 7.3 1 27.5 1.33 0.32
12.00 20 21 71 33 119 0.78 1483 813 4.87 8 7.15 27.4 1.39 0.39 3 4.67 3 6.96 25.3 1.30 0.20
16 4.26 2 6.69 28.3 1.19 0.25
33 4.49 3 6.91 27.5 1.15 0.24
C27 0.25 20 20 46 33 110 0.58 2388
0.75 18 19 38 31 100 0.38 2109
1.25 19 19 24 31 102 0.51 1471
1.75 7 18 33 29 88 0.24 945 83 4.03 14 6.55 28.2 1.03 0.31 2.50 6 17 52 26 82 0.24 493 100 3.58 4 6.41 28.3 0.97 0.54 3.50 5 16 42 26 76 0.11 572 110 3.44 12 6.22 31.4 0.95 0.53 5.00 7 18 38 29 88 0.85 582 153 3.91 44 6.58 29.1 1.06 0.42 7.00 8 17 29 29 95 0.24 575 190 4.05 109 6.54 28.9 1.10 0.43
9.00 7 17 52 28 91 0.71 486 166 3.90 174 6.60 27.5 1.06 0.49
12.00 17 17 33 32 91 0.71 518 170 3.79 104 6.56 27.2 1.00 0.15
C28 0.50 16 20 94 34 113 0.43 5398 674 4.80 6 7.63 26.1 1.37 0.31
1.50 16 19 128 34 113 0.57 3917 664 4.83 6 7.47 25.0 1.34 0.35
2.50 17 20 103 36 115 0.43 3398 654 5.03 20 7.82 26.1 1.41 0.36
3.50 16 20 89 34 108 1.04 2224 417 4.99 64 7.49 25.9 1.38 0.31
5.00 18 20 81 39 109 0.37 3486 486 4.54 58 7.59 23.0 1.23 0.17
7.00 16 19 132 34 111 0.37 3675 615 4.87 50 7.49 24.2 1.38 0.50 9.00 17 21 137 37 114 0.37 2887 615 5.14 13 7.60 26.1 1.43 0.42
12.00 17 20 138 35 111 0.43 1577 496 5.17 45 7.59 26.9 1.39 0.43
C32 0.25 14 16 63 27 96 0.70 1417 3 4.09 3 7.17 29.2 1.29 0.81
0.75 15 17 63 28 98 0.63 1162 53 4.30 3 7.01 28.2 1.36 0.69
1.25 14 16 24 27 97 0.57 622 126 4.08 10 6.93 28.9 1.36 0.65 1.75 16 17 58 28 100 0.90 509 146 4.13 130 7.07 27.5 1.35 0.59 2.50 18 19 38 30 108 0.50 517 160 4.43 301 7.44 26.9 1.45 0.54 3.50 17 18 43 29 106 1.11 525 146 4.39 433 7.27 28.3 1.43 0.62 5.00 14 15 135 26 93 0.30 469 170 3.92 348 6.90 29.9 1.30 0.70
7.00 16 17 53 28 105 0.30 471 183 4.22 106 7.09 28.4 1.42 0.57 9.00 14 15 76 24 91 0.30 435 146 3.82 173 6.76 30.4 1.25 0.64
12.00 16 17 33 29 104 1.24 408 150 3.96 8 7.02 28.9 1.32 0.56
c35 0.25 12 18 67 21 80 0.49 1749 8 3.76 4 6.61 29.1 1.19 0.96
0.75 12 17 29 20 74 1.10 1027 40 3.57 4 6.38 29.4 1.12 1.01 1.25 11 17 61 18 68 0.90 637 69 3.50 4 6.18 29.2 1.11 1.30
1.75 10 17 80 19 70 0.63 434 105 3.28 4 6.16 28.5 1.03 1.04
2.50 10 17 62 16 66 0.49 364 111 3.09 5 6.34 30.7 1.02 1.04 3.50 11 17 66 17 70 1.24 335 89 3.21 9 6.33 29.7 1.08 0.91
5.00 11 18 70 18 74 1.44 338 73 3.47 8 6.32 28.2 1.12 0.86
7.00 12 19 99 18 77 0.63 354 3.74 11 6.56 28.5 1.16 0.87
9.00 12 19 74 18 76 0.56 352 3.64 6 6.71 29.5 1.15 0.97 12.00 12 19 86 17 78 2.25 345 3.68 37 6.41 28.8 1.13 0.81
R.F. Ndting et d/Marine Chrmistrv 53 (1996) 285-299 298
C36 0.25 0.75 1.25 1.75
16 17 48 33 99 0.42 17 18 48 36 106 0.90
18 18 58 36 104 1.03
18 19 50 36 100 0.63
2.50 16 18 90 33 86 1.10
3.50 14 16 100 31 70 1.17
5.00 10 14 38 24 48 0.49 7.00 6 12 62 16 69 0.70
9.00 12 16 47 28 85 0.36
12.00 14 17 52 31 0.70
C38 4 11 33 8 25
01 2 11 122 16 41
02 16 18 65 33 127
03 11 11 68 24 80
04 4 10 34 17 60
05 1 10 19 8 14
09 5 9 63 14 45
13 3 10 54 14 50
15 15 16 128 29 105 16 5 13 59 16 51
23 13 12 142 24 104
25 4 12 73 17 55
27 surf. 16 19 59 30 126 27 > 1 cm 18 18 124 30 134
2128 12 4.36 4 6.90 24.3 1.43 0.62 1646 137 4.59 4 7.00 23.6 1.50 0.61
1240 202 4.64 4 7.03 24.0 1.51 0.63
952 244 4.57 5 6.91 23.8 1.49 0.72
778 206 4.42 4 6.88 24.1 1.47 0.79
510 163 3.94 7 6.75 26.2 1.34 0.92 387 108 3.22 14 6.38 28.6 1.12 1.01
238 56 2.11 47 5.45 27.5 0.77 0.97
324 43 3.48 18 6.49 26.6 1.26 0.85 346 30 3.81 3 6.81 26.4 1.32 0.71 461 1.18 4.95 32.6 0.38 0.40
388 2.15 4.38 31.4 0.56 0.35 905 5.14 6.99 25.9 1.38 0.26
695 2.99 5.56 26.6 0.98 0.57
353 2.18 5.31 31.5 0.75 0.97 41 0.63 2.53 35.3 0.10 0.05
217 1.93 4.43 34.8 0.57 0.32 309 2.09 5.36 30.6 0.67 0.47
481 4.00 6.53 27.5 1.33 0.43 674 1.74 4.67 30.1 0.47 0.43 450 3.24 6.30 30.2 1.25 0.71 603 2.38 4.13 37.0 0.46 0.1 1 602 4.72 7.04 26.6 1.39 0.29 461 4.18 7.13 27.2 1.37 0.24
References
Bruland, K.W., Bertine, K., Koide, M. and Goldberg, E.D., 1974.
History of metal pollution in southern California1 coastal zone.
Environ. Sci. Technol., 8(5): 425-432.
Burenkov, V.I.. 1992. In: J.M. Martin (Editor), Cruise Report
Spasiba Expedition.
Cauwet, G. and Sidorov, I., 1996. The biogeochemistry of Lena
River. Mar. Chem., 53: 21 l-227.
Chester, R., 1990. Marine Geochemistry. Unwin Hyman, London,
pp. 462-463.
Church, T.M. and Windom, H.L., 1993. Special Issue: Second
International Symposium on the Biogeochemistry of Model
Estuaries: Estuarine Processes in Gobal Change. Mar. Chem.,
43( I -4).
Duinker. J.C. and Nolting, R.F., 1976. Distribution model for
particulate trace metals in the Rhine estuary, Southern Bight
and Dutch Wadden Sea. Neth. J. Sea Res., IO: 71-102.
Duinker, J.C., van Eck, G.T.M. and Nolting, R.F., 1974. On the
behaviour of copper, zinc, iron and manganese, and evidence
for mobilization processes in the Dutch Wadden Sea. Neth. J.
Sea Res., 8(2/3): 214-239.
Eisma, D., Berger, G.W., Wei-Yue, C. and Jian, S., 1989. Pb-210 as a tracer for sediment transport and deposition in the
Dutch-German Waddensea. Proc. KNGMG Symposium
Coastal Lowlands, Geology and Geotechnology. Kluwer, Dor-
drecht, pp. 237-253.
Eisma, D., Augustinus, P.G.E.F. and Alexander, C., 1991. Recent
and subrecent changes in the dispersal of Amazon mud. Neth.
J. Sea Res., 28: 181-192.
Gobeil, C. and Silverberg, N., 1989. Early diagenesis of lead in
Laurentian Trough sediments. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta,
53(8): 188991895.
Gobeil. C., Silverberg. N., Sundby, B. and Cossa, D., 1987.
Cadmium diagenesis in Laurentian Trough sediments.
Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 51(3): 589-596.
Gordeev, V.V. and Sidorov, I.S., 1993. Concentrations of major
elements and their outflow into the Laptev Sea by the Lena
River. Mar. Chem., 43(1-4): 33-46.
Griepink, B. and Muntau, H.. 1988. The certification of the
contents (mass fractions) of As, Cd, Cr, Cu, Hg, Ni, Pb, SC, Se
and Zn in three sediments, Estuarine sediment CRM 277, Lake
sediment CRM 280 and River sediment CRM 320. BCR
information, Commission of the European Communities,
Community Bureau of Reference, Brussels.
Guieu. C., Martin, J.M., Thomas, A.J., and Elbaz-Poulichet, F.,
199 I Atmospheric versus river inputs of metals to the Gulf of
Lions. Mar. Pollut. Bull., 22: 176-183.
Happee, T.J.W. and Nolting, R.F., 1994. Behaviour of trace- and
major elements in sediments in an upwelling zone of the
R. F. Nolting et al. /Marine Chemistry 53 (IY%) 285-2YY 299
Somalia and Oman continental margin and the equatorial
Indian Ocean. NIOZ-Rapp., 1994-7.
Helder, W., 1989. Early diagenesis and sediment-water exchange
in the Savu basin (Eastern Indonesia). Neth. J. Sea Res., 24(4):
555-572.
Jansen, J.H.F. and Van der Gaast. S.J., 1988. Accumulation and
dissolution of opal in Quatemary sediments of the Zaire
deep-sea fan (N.E. Angola Basin). Mar. Geol.. 83: l-7.
Johnson, KS.. Berelson, W.M., Coale, K.H., Coley, T.L., Elrod,
V.A.. Fairey, W.R.. Iams. H.D., Kilgore, T.E. and Nowicki,
J.L.. 1992. Manganese flux from continental margin sediments
in a transect through the oxygen minimum. Science, 257:
1242- 1245.
Krauskopf. K.B.. 1965. Introduction to geochemistry. McGraw-
Hill. New York, NY, pp. I-721.
Letoile, R.. Martin, J.M., Thomas, A.J., Gordeev, V.V., Gusarova,
S and Sidorov. IS., 1993. “0 abundance and dissolved
silicate in the Lena delta and Laptev Sea (Russia). Mar.
Chem.. 43( l-4): 47-64.
Macdonald, R.W., Macdonald, D.M., O’Brien, M.C. and Gobeil,
C.. 1991. Accumulation of heavy metals (Pb, Zn, Cu. Cd)
carbon and nitrogen in sediments from Strait of Georgia, B.C.,
Canada. Mar. Chem., 34: 109-I 35.
Martin. J.M. and Whitfield. M., 1983. The significance of the
river input of chemical elements to the ocean. In: C.C. Wong,
E.A. Boyle. K.W. Bruland, J.D. Burton and E.D. Goldberg
(Editors). Trace Metals in Sea Water. Plenum. New York, NY,
pp. 265-296.
Martin, J.M.. Elbaz-Poulichet, F.. Guieu. C., Loye-Pilot. M.D. and
Han. G.. 1989. River versus atmospheric input to the western
Mediterranean: A summary. In: J.M. Martin and H. Barth
(Editors). Water Pollution Research Reports 13. EROS 2000.
CEC Brussels. pp. 423-434.
Martin. J.M., Guan, D.M.. Elbaz-Poulichet, F., Thomas, A.J. and
Gordeev. V.V.. 1993. Preliminary assessment of the distribu-
tion of some trace elements (As, Cd, Cu, Fe. Ni, Pb and Zn) in
a pristine aquatic environment: the Lena River estuary (Rus-
sia). Mar. Chem., 43( l-4): 185-200.
Nolting, R.F. and Eisma. D.. 1988. Elementary composition of
suspended particulate matter in the North Sea. Neth. J. Sea
Res.. 22(3): 2 19-236.
Nolting. R.F. and Helder, W., 1991. Lead and zinc as indicators
for atmospheric and riverine particle transport to sediments in
the Gulf of Lions. Oceanol. Acta. 14(4): 357-367.
Nolting, R.F. and Van Hoogstraten. R.J., 1992. The occurrence of
some distinct areas in the N.W. Mediterranean Sea based on
the elemental properties of the sediment (Horizontal and verti-
cal distribution). In: J.M. Martin and H. Barth (Editors), Water
Pollution Research Report 28, Commission of the European
Communities, Brussels, pp. 437-450.
Nolting, R.F. and Van Hoogstraten, R.J.. 1993. Diagenesis and the
vertical distribution of metals in the Gulf of Lions. In: J.M.
Martin and H. Barth (Editors). Water Pollution Research
Report 30. Commission of the European Communities. Brus-
sels. pp. 237-242.
Nolting. R.F.. Sundby, B. and Duinker. J.C., 1990. Behaviour of
minor and major elements in suspended matter in the Rhine
and Meuse Rivers and estuary. Sci. Total Environ,. 97/98:
169-183.
Rantala, R.T.T. and Loring. D.N.. 1977. A rapid determination of
IO elements in marine suspended particulate matter by atomic
absorption spectrophotometry. Atom. Absorp. Newslett.. 16:
5 l-52.
Reeburgh. W.S., 1967. An improved interstitial water sampler.
Limnol. Oceanogr.. 12: 163- 170.
Salomons, W. and Eysink, W.D., 1981. Pathways of mud and
particulate trace metals from rivers to the southern North Sea.
Spec. Pub]. Assoc. Sedimentol., 5: 429-450.
Sundby. B. and Silverberg, N., 1985. Manganese fluxes in the
bentic boundary layer. Limnol. Oceanogr.. 30(2): 372-38 1. Sundby, B.. Silverberg, N. and Chesselet. R.. 1981. Pathways of
manganese in an open estuarine system. Geochim. Coa-
mochim. Acta, 45(3): 293-307.
Trefry. J.H., Metz, S., Trochine, R.P. and Nelsen, T.A.. 1985. A
decline in lead transport by the Mississippi River. Science,
230: 439-44 I Van Dalen, M. and Nohing, R.F.. 1992. Spoor- en hoofdele-
menten in sediment en poriewater van het Lena-estuarium en
de Laptevzee. NIOZ Data-Rapp.. 5. pp. l-79 (in Dutch).
Van Hoogstraten. R.J. and Nolting, R.F.. 1991. Trace and major
elements in sediments and in porewaters from the North
Western basin of the Mediterranean Sea. NIOZ Rapp., 1991-10.
pp. l-72.
Verardo. D.J., Froelich, P.N. and McIntyre, A.. 1990. Determina-
tion of organic carbon and nitrogen in marine sediments using
the Carlo Erba NA-1500 Analyzer. Deep Sea Res.. 37: 157-
165.
Wright, L.D.. 1989. Dispersal and deposition of river sediments in
coastal seas: Models from Asia and the Tropics. Neth. J. Sea
Res., 23(4): 493-500.
Wright, L.D. and Coleman, J.M.. 1974. Mississippi River mouth
processes: Effluent dynamics and morphologic development.
J. Geol.. 82: 751-778.