distribution-franchisee-challenges_satish-kulkarni.pdf
TRANSCRIPT
-
Distribution Franchisee: Challenges in owning Legacy Network and Data for Business Viability and Transformation
SATISH KULKARNI CIO, ESSEL UTILITIES
-
AgendaEssel Group in Utilities
Distribution Franchise Current structure
Our Vision of the Business
Challenges : our experience
Our solution Roadmap
Q&A
-
Essel UtilitiesIntegrated utility company in India;
Acquired power and water distribution projects for major cities;
Essel Utilities is an enterprise of the Essel Group, Indias leading media and
entertainment conglomerate
Group turnover of $ 2.5 bn (FY 2011) ;
Market capitalization of over $ 5.2 bn of groups listed companies.
We envisage creating value
Top line revenue of $ 300 mn;
Over one million consumer base by FY 2013-14.
-
Project Areas
Power Distribution
Nagpur (Maharashtra);
Sagar (MP);
Ujjain (MP);
Gwalior (MP);
Muzaffarpur (Bihar).
Water Distribution
Aurangabad (Maharashtra).
-
Integrated Utility
Services
Power;
Water;
Gas;
Solid waste.
Shared
Infrastructure
Customer
Services;
Billing &
Collection;
IT Systems.
Value Added Services
Leveraging
Customer
Connect;
Value added services through other Business Integrations.
Leveraging Customer Connect Reduce Costs Improve Profitability
-
Distribution Franchisee Increased traction
Reduce Aggregate Technical &
Commercial Losses
DISCOMs key challenge
Public Private Partnership R-APDRP
Distribution
Franchisee
Initiatives by SEBs for efficient operations
Upcoming opportunities in Distribution FranchiseeMaharashtra : Ulhasnagar, Malegaon, Kalwa, Mumbra & Shil
Bihar : Gaya, Patna
Madhya Pradesh : Bhind, Datia, Satna, Guna, Dewas, Shahjpur, Narshinghpur, Indore, Bhopal, Jabalpur
Uttarakhand : Roorkee, Rudrapur, Haridwar, Dehradun
Uttar Pradesh : Bareily, Gorakhpur, Allahbad, Meerut, Varanasi, Aligarh, Ghaziabad
Jharkhand : Deoghar, Hazaribagh, Dhanbad
Haryana : Gurgaon, Panipath, Faridabad, Ballabgarh
Rajasthan : Kota, Bikaner, Bharatput, Udaipur
Others : Hubli (Karnataka); Hyderabad Old (Andhra Pradesh); Jammu (J&K)
Distribution Franchisees Awarded
A. Bhiwandi: Awarded to Torrent Power in 2006. Total
volume 2,400 MUs with losses of 58%
B. Nagpur: Awarded to Spanco Limited in 2010. Total
current volume at 1,300 MUs with losses of 30%.
Acquired by Essel Utilities in 2012
C. Aurangabad: Awarded to GTL in 2010. Total current
volume at 1,250 MUs with losses of 42%
D. Agra & Kanpur: Awarded to Torrent Power in 2010.
Total current volume at 4,650 MUs with losses of 45%
E. Jalgaon: Awarded to Crompton Greaves in 2011. Total
current volume at 667 MUs with losses of 30%
F. Gwalior, Sagar and Ujjain: Essel Group has been
awarded. Losses at ~40% - 45%
G. Jamsedhpur: Awarded to Tata Power in 2012.
H. Ranchi: Awarded to CESC in 2012
I. . Muzaffarpur Awarded to Essel,
J. Bhagalpur Awarded to SPML
Several States expected to accelerate privatization of distribution entities providing credible base for
long term portfolio growth
-
Key drivers of returnsLoss
Reduction
Execution
Economies of Scale
Growth
Reduction in AT&C loss achieved directly adds to the bottom line
Capex optimization and technological improvements
Centralisation of key processes to realize low incremental operating costs
Ability to procure power at relatively competitive rates from 3rd party vendors
Linked to growth in per capita consumption as well as number of consumers
Competitive advantage in bidding for other utilities in the same city or in other cities of same state
Process re-engineering to minimize leakages and achieve synergistic system integration
IT deployment and automation of key processes leads to improved efficiencies
-
Power Sector Policy & Reforms
Electricity Act 2003
National Electricity
Policy - 2005
National Tariff
Policy - 2006
Liberal power development framework
Competitive Environment
Private Investment
Multiple licensing of distribution
Stringent theft control
Trading distinct activity permitted with licensing
Accessibility to power
Spinning Reserves
Quality Power
Per capita electricity from 612 to 1000 by 2012
Commercial viability
Restructuring of distribution utilities
Adequate financing support to utility
Transparency and Accountability
Private sector participation to reduce losses
Competitive Procurement & Transmission of Power
Efficient operations
Promote Multi Year Tariff framework
Loss reduction
Progressive reduction of Cross Subsidy
State & Joint Electricity
Regulatory Commission
Central Electricity Regulatory
Commission
Dis
trib
utio
n F
ran
chis
ee
Acce
lera
ted P
ow
er
Dis
trib
utio
n &
Re
form
Pro
gra
m
-
Our Approach
Asset Survey
Asset Survey
Asset Condition
Assessment
Network Analysis
Commercial Due Diligence
Consumer Profiling
Commercial Losses
Profiling
Collection Baskets
Customer Connect
Consumer Need
Assessment
Community Leadership
connect
Public Relationship
Initiatives
Customer Need Analysis
Working on improving consumer connect
Call Center, Customer
Service Centers
Collection Efficiency
Network Improvement
Immediate O&M Needs
Reduced FOC/NPC
Circle Control
Loss Reduction
Network Securitization
AB Cable / Metering
Focus on Enhanced Vigilance
Periodic Inspections
Pre Takeover
-
Challenges Customer Database Database is legacy in nature
Documentation on the legacy system is scarcely available
No structured mechanism of information sharing in DFA
Integration Issues with utility system
Support for the business process changes needed at ground zero level
Learn by experience fact of the day
Asset Database Asset Survey provides limited visibility
As build details are not available
Most of the Assets not supported by AMC /Warranties
No reliable maintenance history records
R-APDRP Agreements : DF agreements issues
-
Widescale IT deployment to improve data collection and system integration
Implementation of process level automation to improve efficacy and overall system reliability
Automation initiatives:
AMR Automated Meter Reading
Bill printing and bill delivery
Streamline collection strategy
GIS based Consumer indexing & bucketing
Dunning policy based collection Periodic rule based interventions such as SMS, Outbound calling for payment reminders
Enhancing consumer experience
centralized 24x7 call centers
FTR First Trial Response policy
Queue management system to streamline complaint assessment and provide hassle free service
Plugging apparent holes in implementation and access to first level loss reduction hooking, collection, meters, aged infrastructure
On-site assessment of hooking and power theft cases
Implementing Arial Bunch Cabling as permanent solution to hooking
Meter infrastructure enhancement (electro-mechanical to digital) and replacement
Proactive vigilance to prevent recurrence of thefts
Shift from Old Conventional Utility based structure to Integrated Smart Utility structure
Centralization of common services to achieve cost sustainability
Incorporation of best-practices through Outsourcing
Establishing economies of scale with ability to integrate other utilities into system through development of plug-and-play structure
R&D center establishment to focus on continual technology up-gradation
Create platform for achieving economies of
scale through development of plug-and-
play smart utility model
IT deployment and process re-
engineering
Immediate loss reduction
Essels execution strategy
Stage - I
Stage - II
Stage - III
-
U Input Costs Control T&D Loss Reduction Collection Efficiency
Exponential Business Growth Business Sustenance
OPEX Control Optimize Asset Usage Project Management
Multi Services Utility Business B2B Integration with Group
Commercial
Operational
Growth
Cross Business
Utility Business Drivers : IT Plan
IntegratedUtility
-
Critical Business Factors for DF IT ArchitectureMulti State , Multi Service Operations
State wise Regulatory Regime
Statutory rules different
Operational need differ viz Holiday , Reporting, Tariffs, O&M Needs as per demography
Quick Role out , parallel implementation tracks
Shared Corporate Services Finance ,HR, Procurement, IT
B2B Service Integration
Single Business View through Analytics
Manageability, Flexibility , User Adoption
-
ALIGNEDTO
BUSINESS
INDUSTRYSTANDARDS
BEST OF
BREEDSTRICT
SECURITYPOLICY
RAPID BUTSTAGGED
DEPLOYMENT
BESTINDUSTRY
TALENT
SUSTAINANCE
ITSTRATEGY
Our IT strategy is mainly driven to compliment the dynamic business needs and sustenance
Our IT Strategy
-
LEGACY BILLING
QUICK FIX CRM
EXISTING AMR
CUSTOMER METERS
DT METERS
QUICK FIX CUST. SERVICEAPP.
AMR PHASE-1
NETWORK STUDY
BILLING
CUSTOMER CARE
METERING IMPROVEMENTS
METER DATA MANAGEMENT
AMR PHASE-1/2
GIS
SMART METERING
ASSETMANAGEMENT
PORTAL
AMR PHASE-2
GIS
GROUP METERING
ENTERPRISEINTEGRATION
SCADA
ERP
AMR PHASE-2
GIS
DEMAND MANAGEMENT
FIELD AUTOMATION
B2B INTEGRATION
BUSINESSSUSTAINANCE
PROCESS BLUEPRINTBUSINESS
ANALYTICS
Quick Fix Business Essential Enterprise Analytics
Application Implementation Roadmap
-
Metering Service Provider (MSP)- Concept
Concept Similar to Deregulated Market
Single Window Metering Responsibility a
Metering OPEX Model
Utilize Vendors Expertise
Rapid Control over Commercial Losses
Leverage AMI/AMR to reduce O&M cost over large area by getting outages information
Technology Risk Management
Efficient Utilization of the Meter Information
Leased
Supply
Installation
Operations
Maintenance
MSP will be a Single Window Metering Responsibility Center for DF
-
Meter Services Provider (MSP)- Responsibilities
All types of Meters and AMR on RF Mesh
Related Equipment
Meter Testing Equipment
Meter Inventory Storage
Maintain Adequate Stock for Meters and other Equipment
Supply Lease
Participate in Installation Planning/ Targets / SLA Setting
Meet Mass Meter Installations Targets as per SLA
Provide MIS and SLA Reports
Take Corrective Actions
Installation
Setup an Metering Operation Center (MOC)
Meter Read Schedules, Ensure Daily Meter Reads Success
Receive Meter Related Complaints
Analyze Reading Issues, Faulty Meters , Mobilize Maintenance Crew
Inventory Management, SLAs, MIS and Dashboards
Operation
Maintenance Crews Mobilization
Receive Maintenance Work Orders
Attend Metering Work Orders as per SLAs
Address all Field Related Issues
Maintenance
-
Zero Commercial Loss Framework Forum of Electricity Regulator report on loss reduction strategy
Recommendation Third party verification of energy audit results for different areas/localities
could be used to impose area/locality specific surcharge for greater AT&C loss levels and this in turn could generate local consensus for effective action for better governance
Commercial loss surcharge equivalent to losses of group of consumers is recoverable
-
Maharashtra Case StudyMERC vide Tariff order in JAN 2002
Introduced a process for Loss Charge on the consumers
Based on average realization from consumer category
Intention is to create awareness in consumers
Intention is to differentiate between circles based on loss levels
In Jan 2003 , charges exempted for 11 circles where losses are below target loss level
T&D Loss charges concept has brought in some awareness
The charge withdrawn from 2003
-
Maharashtra Case Study : LearningLoss Charge is viable and can be incorporated by regulatory order
Loss Charge can be leveraged for the losses which are grater than the losses factored in the tariff
Need to establish Energy Accounting in smaller consumer group
Transparent Mechanism for Result Verification
Visibility created at group level enables better control
Effort need to be sustained by use of appropriate technology
Group Metering project ROI can be through loss charge mechanism
-
Metering InitiativesSystem Metering
0.5 Class Meters for Feeders & DTRs
Interval data recording for all key parameters
Communicable Meters
Use for Asset Operational Analysis
Group Metering Metering for group of consumers
20 to 25 Consumers in a group
Communicable Meters with Active & Reactive Energy recording capability
Detection of abnormal usage pattern
-
Social Responsibility ModelSocial Network Portal which will provide
Transparency regarding AT&C Losses calculations
Loss Surcharge Calculations
Can be viewed by all stake holders Regulators
Consumers
DISCOM
Serves as platform to bring in reduction of AT&C loss through local consensus for effective action & better governance
-
Q&A