distribution-franchisee-challenges_satish-kulkarni.pdf

23
Distribution Franchisee: Challenges in owning Legacy Network and Data for Business Viability and Transformation SATISH KULKARNI CIO, ESSEL UTILITIES

Upload: amitsh20072458

Post on 01-Oct-2015

7 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Distribution Franchisee: Challenges in owning Legacy Network and Data for Business Viability and Transformation

    SATISH KULKARNI CIO, ESSEL UTILITIES

  • AgendaEssel Group in Utilities

    Distribution Franchise Current structure

    Our Vision of the Business

    Challenges : our experience

    Our solution Roadmap

    Q&A

  • Essel UtilitiesIntegrated utility company in India;

    Acquired power and water distribution projects for major cities;

    Essel Utilities is an enterprise of the Essel Group, Indias leading media and

    entertainment conglomerate

    Group turnover of $ 2.5 bn (FY 2011) ;

    Market capitalization of over $ 5.2 bn of groups listed companies.

    We envisage creating value

    Top line revenue of $ 300 mn;

    Over one million consumer base by FY 2013-14.

  • Project Areas

    Power Distribution

    Nagpur (Maharashtra);

    Sagar (MP);

    Ujjain (MP);

    Gwalior (MP);

    Muzaffarpur (Bihar).

    Water Distribution

    Aurangabad (Maharashtra).

  • Integrated Utility

    Services

    Power;

    Water;

    Gas;

    Solid waste.

    Shared

    Infrastructure

    Customer

    Services;

    Billing &

    Collection;

    IT Systems.

    Value Added Services

    Leveraging

    Customer

    Connect;

    Value added services through other Business Integrations.

    Leveraging Customer Connect Reduce Costs Improve Profitability

  • Distribution Franchisee Increased traction

    Reduce Aggregate Technical &

    Commercial Losses

    DISCOMs key challenge

    Public Private Partnership R-APDRP

    Distribution

    Franchisee

    Initiatives by SEBs for efficient operations

    Upcoming opportunities in Distribution FranchiseeMaharashtra : Ulhasnagar, Malegaon, Kalwa, Mumbra & Shil

    Bihar : Gaya, Patna

    Madhya Pradesh : Bhind, Datia, Satna, Guna, Dewas, Shahjpur, Narshinghpur, Indore, Bhopal, Jabalpur

    Uttarakhand : Roorkee, Rudrapur, Haridwar, Dehradun

    Uttar Pradesh : Bareily, Gorakhpur, Allahbad, Meerut, Varanasi, Aligarh, Ghaziabad

    Jharkhand : Deoghar, Hazaribagh, Dhanbad

    Haryana : Gurgaon, Panipath, Faridabad, Ballabgarh

    Rajasthan : Kota, Bikaner, Bharatput, Udaipur

    Others : Hubli (Karnataka); Hyderabad Old (Andhra Pradesh); Jammu (J&K)

    Distribution Franchisees Awarded

    A. Bhiwandi: Awarded to Torrent Power in 2006. Total

    volume 2,400 MUs with losses of 58%

    B. Nagpur: Awarded to Spanco Limited in 2010. Total

    current volume at 1,300 MUs with losses of 30%.

    Acquired by Essel Utilities in 2012

    C. Aurangabad: Awarded to GTL in 2010. Total current

    volume at 1,250 MUs with losses of 42%

    D. Agra & Kanpur: Awarded to Torrent Power in 2010.

    Total current volume at 4,650 MUs with losses of 45%

    E. Jalgaon: Awarded to Crompton Greaves in 2011. Total

    current volume at 667 MUs with losses of 30%

    F. Gwalior, Sagar and Ujjain: Essel Group has been

    awarded. Losses at ~40% - 45%

    G. Jamsedhpur: Awarded to Tata Power in 2012.

    H. Ranchi: Awarded to CESC in 2012

    I. . Muzaffarpur Awarded to Essel,

    J. Bhagalpur Awarded to SPML

    Several States expected to accelerate privatization of distribution entities providing credible base for

    long term portfolio growth

  • Key drivers of returnsLoss

    Reduction

    Execution

    Economies of Scale

    Growth

    Reduction in AT&C loss achieved directly adds to the bottom line

    Capex optimization and technological improvements

    Centralisation of key processes to realize low incremental operating costs

    Ability to procure power at relatively competitive rates from 3rd party vendors

    Linked to growth in per capita consumption as well as number of consumers

    Competitive advantage in bidding for other utilities in the same city or in other cities of same state

    Process re-engineering to minimize leakages and achieve synergistic system integration

    IT deployment and automation of key processes leads to improved efficiencies

  • Power Sector Policy & Reforms

    Electricity Act 2003

    National Electricity

    Policy - 2005

    National Tariff

    Policy - 2006

    Liberal power development framework

    Competitive Environment

    Private Investment

    Multiple licensing of distribution

    Stringent theft control

    Trading distinct activity permitted with licensing

    Accessibility to power

    Spinning Reserves

    Quality Power

    Per capita electricity from 612 to 1000 by 2012

    Commercial viability

    Restructuring of distribution utilities

    Adequate financing support to utility

    Transparency and Accountability

    Private sector participation to reduce losses

    Competitive Procurement & Transmission of Power

    Efficient operations

    Promote Multi Year Tariff framework

    Loss reduction

    Progressive reduction of Cross Subsidy

    State & Joint Electricity

    Regulatory Commission

    Central Electricity Regulatory

    Commission

    Dis

    trib

    utio

    n F

    ran

    chis

    ee

    Acce

    lera

    ted P

    ow

    er

    Dis

    trib

    utio

    n &

    Re

    form

    Pro

    gra

    m

  • Our Approach

    Asset Survey

    Asset Survey

    Asset Condition

    Assessment

    Network Analysis

    Commercial Due Diligence

    Consumer Profiling

    Commercial Losses

    Profiling

    Collection Baskets

    Customer Connect

    Consumer Need

    Assessment

    Community Leadership

    connect

    Public Relationship

    Initiatives

    Customer Need Analysis

    Working on improving consumer connect

    Call Center, Customer

    Service Centers

    Collection Efficiency

    Network Improvement

    Immediate O&M Needs

    Reduced FOC/NPC

    Circle Control

    Loss Reduction

    Network Securitization

    AB Cable / Metering

    Focus on Enhanced Vigilance

    Periodic Inspections

    Pre Takeover

  • Challenges Customer Database Database is legacy in nature

    Documentation on the legacy system is scarcely available

    No structured mechanism of information sharing in DFA

    Integration Issues with utility system

    Support for the business process changes needed at ground zero level

    Learn by experience fact of the day

    Asset Database Asset Survey provides limited visibility

    As build details are not available

    Most of the Assets not supported by AMC /Warranties

    No reliable maintenance history records

    R-APDRP Agreements : DF agreements issues

  • Widescale IT deployment to improve data collection and system integration

    Implementation of process level automation to improve efficacy and overall system reliability

    Automation initiatives:

    AMR Automated Meter Reading

    Bill printing and bill delivery

    Streamline collection strategy

    GIS based Consumer indexing & bucketing

    Dunning policy based collection Periodic rule based interventions such as SMS, Outbound calling for payment reminders

    Enhancing consumer experience

    centralized 24x7 call centers

    FTR First Trial Response policy

    Queue management system to streamline complaint assessment and provide hassle free service

    Plugging apparent holes in implementation and access to first level loss reduction hooking, collection, meters, aged infrastructure

    On-site assessment of hooking and power theft cases

    Implementing Arial Bunch Cabling as permanent solution to hooking

    Meter infrastructure enhancement (electro-mechanical to digital) and replacement

    Proactive vigilance to prevent recurrence of thefts

    Shift from Old Conventional Utility based structure to Integrated Smart Utility structure

    Centralization of common services to achieve cost sustainability

    Incorporation of best-practices through Outsourcing

    Establishing economies of scale with ability to integrate other utilities into system through development of plug-and-play structure

    R&D center establishment to focus on continual technology up-gradation

    Create platform for achieving economies of

    scale through development of plug-and-

    play smart utility model

    IT deployment and process re-

    engineering

    Immediate loss reduction

    Essels execution strategy

    Stage - I

    Stage - II

    Stage - III

  • U Input Costs Control T&D Loss Reduction Collection Efficiency

    Exponential Business Growth Business Sustenance

    OPEX Control Optimize Asset Usage Project Management

    Multi Services Utility Business B2B Integration with Group

    Commercial

    Operational

    Growth

    Cross Business

    Utility Business Drivers : IT Plan

    IntegratedUtility

  • Critical Business Factors for DF IT ArchitectureMulti State , Multi Service Operations

    State wise Regulatory Regime

    Statutory rules different

    Operational need differ viz Holiday , Reporting, Tariffs, O&M Needs as per demography

    Quick Role out , parallel implementation tracks

    Shared Corporate Services Finance ,HR, Procurement, IT

    B2B Service Integration

    Single Business View through Analytics

    Manageability, Flexibility , User Adoption

  • ALIGNEDTO

    BUSINESS

    INDUSTRYSTANDARDS

    BEST OF

    BREEDSTRICT

    SECURITYPOLICY

    RAPID BUTSTAGGED

    DEPLOYMENT

    BESTINDUSTRY

    TALENT

    SUSTAINANCE

    ITSTRATEGY

    Our IT strategy is mainly driven to compliment the dynamic business needs and sustenance

    Our IT Strategy

  • LEGACY BILLING

    QUICK FIX CRM

    EXISTING AMR

    CUSTOMER METERS

    DT METERS

    QUICK FIX CUST. SERVICEAPP.

    AMR PHASE-1

    NETWORK STUDY

    BILLING

    CUSTOMER CARE

    METERING IMPROVEMENTS

    METER DATA MANAGEMENT

    AMR PHASE-1/2

    GIS

    SMART METERING

    ASSETMANAGEMENT

    PORTAL

    AMR PHASE-2

    GIS

    GROUP METERING

    ENTERPRISEINTEGRATION

    SCADA

    ERP

    AMR PHASE-2

    GIS

    DEMAND MANAGEMENT

    FIELD AUTOMATION

    B2B INTEGRATION

    BUSINESSSUSTAINANCE

    PROCESS BLUEPRINTBUSINESS

    ANALYTICS

    Quick Fix Business Essential Enterprise Analytics

    Application Implementation Roadmap

  • Metering Service Provider (MSP)- Concept

    Concept Similar to Deregulated Market

    Single Window Metering Responsibility a

    Metering OPEX Model

    Utilize Vendors Expertise

    Rapid Control over Commercial Losses

    Leverage AMI/AMR to reduce O&M cost over large area by getting outages information

    Technology Risk Management

    Efficient Utilization of the Meter Information

    Leased

    Supply

    Installation

    Operations

    Maintenance

    MSP will be a Single Window Metering Responsibility Center for DF

  • Meter Services Provider (MSP)- Responsibilities

    All types of Meters and AMR on RF Mesh

    Related Equipment

    Meter Testing Equipment

    Meter Inventory Storage

    Maintain Adequate Stock for Meters and other Equipment

    Supply Lease

    Participate in Installation Planning/ Targets / SLA Setting

    Meet Mass Meter Installations Targets as per SLA

    Provide MIS and SLA Reports

    Take Corrective Actions

    Installation

    Setup an Metering Operation Center (MOC)

    Meter Read Schedules, Ensure Daily Meter Reads Success

    Receive Meter Related Complaints

    Analyze Reading Issues, Faulty Meters , Mobilize Maintenance Crew

    Inventory Management, SLAs, MIS and Dashboards

    Operation

    Maintenance Crews Mobilization

    Receive Maintenance Work Orders

    Attend Metering Work Orders as per SLAs

    Address all Field Related Issues

    Maintenance

  • Zero Commercial Loss Framework Forum of Electricity Regulator report on loss reduction strategy

    Recommendation Third party verification of energy audit results for different areas/localities

    could be used to impose area/locality specific surcharge for greater AT&C loss levels and this in turn could generate local consensus for effective action for better governance

    Commercial loss surcharge equivalent to losses of group of consumers is recoverable

  • Maharashtra Case StudyMERC vide Tariff order in JAN 2002

    Introduced a process for Loss Charge on the consumers

    Based on average realization from consumer category

    Intention is to create awareness in consumers

    Intention is to differentiate between circles based on loss levels

    In Jan 2003 , charges exempted for 11 circles where losses are below target loss level

    T&D Loss charges concept has brought in some awareness

    The charge withdrawn from 2003

  • Maharashtra Case Study : LearningLoss Charge is viable and can be incorporated by regulatory order

    Loss Charge can be leveraged for the losses which are grater than the losses factored in the tariff

    Need to establish Energy Accounting in smaller consumer group

    Transparent Mechanism for Result Verification

    Visibility created at group level enables better control

    Effort need to be sustained by use of appropriate technology

    Group Metering project ROI can be through loss charge mechanism

  • Metering InitiativesSystem Metering

    0.5 Class Meters for Feeders & DTRs

    Interval data recording for all key parameters

    Communicable Meters

    Use for Asset Operational Analysis

    Group Metering Metering for group of consumers

    20 to 25 Consumers in a group

    Communicable Meters with Active & Reactive Energy recording capability

    Detection of abnormal usage pattern

  • Social Responsibility ModelSocial Network Portal which will provide

    Transparency regarding AT&C Losses calculations

    Loss Surcharge Calculations

    Can be viewed by all stake holders Regulators

    Consumers

    DISCOM

    Serves as platform to bring in reduction of AT&C loss through local consensus for effective action & better governance

  • Q&A