discount for lack of marketability · what is discount for lack of marketability marketability: the...
TRANSCRIPT
Copyright © 2017 The Brattle Group, Inc.
Discount for Lack of Marketability
Fatih Fazilet
PRESENTED BY
Outline
§ Introduc*on
§ RestrictedStockStudies
§ PrivatePlacementTheories
§ RegressionModels
§ Controversies
§ Conclusion
What is Discount for Lack of Marketability
Marketability:theabilitytoquicklyconvertpropertytocashatminimalcost
DiscountforLackofMarketability:anamountorpercentage deductedfromthevalueofanownershipinteresttoreflecttherela*veabsenceofmarketability
Therearesomevalua*onbooksmakingadis*nc*onbetweenliquidityandmarketabilitybutinmostoftheliterature,thesetermsareusedinterchangeably.
Sources of Illiquidity
Amihudetal.2005outlinethesourcesofilliquidity:
1. Exogenoustransac*oncostssuchasfeesortransac*ontaxes
2. Notallagentsareinthemarketatall*mes
3. Difficultyofloca*ngacounterpartyespeciallyifthereisnocentralmarketplace(searchfric*ons)
When to Use
Thevalua*onofclosely-heldfirmsisoUencarriedoutintwosteps:§ First,valua*onisdoneasifsharesofthefirmtradeonahighlyliquidexchange.
§ Second,thisvalueisreducedbythesizeofthees*mateddiscountforlackofmarketability(DLOM).
Valua*onofminorityinterestsaresubjecttoDLOMbutapplyingDLOMtoacontrollinginterestiscontroversial.
How to Estimate DLOM
§ BenchmarkApproaches- RestrictedStockStudies(18.1%-33.5%)- Pre-Ini*alPublicOfferingStudies(31.8%-73.1%)
§ Securi*esBasedApproaches(8.3%-69.2%))§ RegressionModels
- Wruck1989(17.6%)- HertzelandSmith1993(<13.5%)- Bajajetal.2001(7.23%)
What is a Restricted Stock
§ Publiccompaniesmayraisecapitalthroughprivateinvestmentinpublicequity(PIPE)transac*onstoaccreditedinvestors.§ Companiescanissueregistered(freelytradable)orunregistered(restricted)stocksinPIPEs.§ Restrictedstockscannotbesoldtoanyinterestedinvestorortradedonthepublicexchangebutcanbesoldtosophis*catedinvestorsduringacertainholdingperiod,aUerwhichtheybecomeregistered.§ Restrictedstocksaretypicallysoldatadiscountcomparedtothepriceofthepubliclytradedstocks.Firmsdonotpaytheregistra*oncostandacquirethebenefitswhichwillbediscussed.
Restricted Stock Studies
Thesestudiesarguethatlackofmarketabilitycanbequan*fiedbycomparingthesalepriceofpubliclytradedsharestothesalepriceofrestrictedsharesofthesamecompanythatareiden*calinallrightsexceptfortheirabilitytobefreelymarketed.
§ Usedataofcompanieswhichhavepubliclytradedsharesandalsohaveissuedrestrictedstocksthroughprivateplacements§ Measurethepricedifferencebetweenpubliclytradedsharesandrestrictedshares§ ReporttheaveragedifferenceasameasureofDLOM
priceofpublicshare
priceofrestrictedshareinprivateplacement
DLOM
Examples of Restricted Stock Studies EmpiricalStudy YearsCovered AveragePriceDiscount
SEC 1966-1969 25.8
Gelman 1968-1970 33.0
Trout 1968-1972 33.5
WilliameheManagementAssociate
1981-1984 31.2
Silber 1981-1988 33.8
ColumbiaFinancialAdvisers
1996-1997 21.0
TrugmanValua*onAssociates
2007-2008 18.1
Two Empirical Observations about PIPEs
1. RestrictedsharesaresoldinPIPEsandsharesinPIPEsaresoldatadiscount,evenwhentheyarenotrestricted.Hencealackofmarketabilitycannotbetheonlyfactorbehindthediscountforrestrictedshares.
2. Thesharepriceofthepre-exis*ngpubliclytradedsharesoUenincreaseaUeraPIPE–whetherrestrictedornot.Thisisincontrasttothestockpriceeffectofapublicoffering.
Private Placement Theories
Belowareseminalempiricalpaperssuppor*ngdifferenttheoriesaboutwhyfirmsissuesharesthroughPIPEsatasignificantdiscount.1. Monitoring,Wruck1989,JournalofFinancialEconomics
2. Cer*fica*on,HertzelandSmith1993,JournalofFinance
3. ManagerialEntrenchment,Barclayetal.2007,JournalofCorporateFinance
Monitoring
§ Monitoringmanagementofacompanyiscostlyanditisworthtopaythiscostonlyforlargeshareholders.Soasthenumberoflargeshareholders(ownershipconcentra*on)increase,monitoringgetsmoreefficient.
§ Privateplacementsareassociatedwithincreaseinownershipconcentra*on.
§ Investorsarecompensatedforexpectedmonitoringbenefitssosharesaresoldatadiscount.
§ Duetothisexpecta*onofefficientmonitoring,marketreactsposi*velyandpriceofpre-exis*ngpubliclytradedsharesincrease.
Certification
§ Thereisasymmetryofinforma*onaboutthefirmvalueandprivateplacementinvestorsmustdocostlyduediligenceonthefirmbeforecommilngtosuchalargepurchase.§ Thefirmcompensatesinvestorsforduediligencecostsbyplacingsharesatadiscount.§ Themarketobservesthistransac*onandthinksthatthefirmmustbehighqualityotherwiseinvestorswouldneverhaveboughttheshares.So,stockpricesincrease.
Managerial Entrenchment
§ Recentresearchhasaccesstomoredetailsaboutinvestorcharacteris*csandtheirbehavioraUertransac*on.
§ Thistheorystatesthatprivateplacementsaremademostlytopassiveinvestorswhichhelpmanagementtosolidifytheircontrolofthefirm.
§ Privateplacementdiscountsarecompensa*onforblockpurchaserstobepassive.
§ Ini*alstockpriceincreaseisduetosystema*coverop*mismofthemarket.
How These Theories Reconcile
§ Thesedifferentexplana*onsarenotmutuallyexclusivebuttheyexplaindifferentmo*va*onsforprivateplacementsdespitethediscounts.§ HertzelandSmithsupportcer*fica*onhypothesisbutalsofindsomeevidenceformonitoring.§ Barclayetal.(2007)supportentrenchmenthypothesisbutstatethatmonitoringandcer*fica*onexplainaminorityofprivateplacements.
Monitoring Cer@fica@on Entrenchment
Discount + + +
Stockpriceincrease
+ + -
Eliminating the Effect of Private Placements
§ Sinceallprivateplacementsaresoldatadiscount,itistemp*ngtocomparethesharepriceinprivateplacementsofrestrictedandunrestrictedsharestomeasurethediscountduetorestric*on.§ Thisdifferenceises*matedtobe17.6%,26.4%,14.1%respec*velybyWruck(1989),HertzelandSmith(1993)andBajajetal.(2001).§ But,notethatcomparisonisnotbetweenrestrictedandunrestrictedsharesofthesamecompany.Forinstance,inHertzelandSmith:
AverageDiscount NumberofObserva@ons
RestrictedShares 42.0% 18
UnrestrictedShares 15.6% 88
Eliminating the Effect of Private Placements
publicshare restrictedshare
Step1
publicshare
restrictedshare
Step2,Wruck
DLOM
unrestrictedshare
DLOM
privateplacementdiscount
*Darkbluebarsrepresentshareprices
Why not take difference between average s
§ Forthedifferencebetweenaveragestomeasurerestric*ondiscount,allfirmcharacteris*csthatcontributetoprivateplacementdiscountmustbeiden*calacrossthetwosamplesofissues,restrictedandunrestricted.
§ Otherwise,inordertoassessthediscountsolelyduetorestric*onofshares,theeffectoffirmcharacteris*csneedtocontrolled.So,weneedtousearegressionmodel.
Regression in Hertzel and Smith 1993
Thedependentvariableisprivateplacementdiscount.
IndependentVariable PredictedSign Coefficient
Intercept 1.402***
Frac*onPlaced + 0.410**
FinancialDistress + 0.091
Book-to-MarketEquity - -0.141**
Logofproceeds - -0.078***
RestrictedShares + 0.135***
SingleInvestor -0.091*
ManagementBuyer 0.021
AdjustedR2 41.3%
***,**,*indicatesta*s*calsignificanceat1%,5%and10%respec*vely.
Regression in Bajaj et al. 2001
Thedependentvariableisprivateplacementdiscount.
IndependentVariable PredictedSign Coefficient
Intercept 4.91
Frac*onPlaced + 0.40**
Z-score - -0.08**
RestrictedShares + 7.23**
Std.ofReturns + 3.13***
AdjustedR2 32.3%
***,**,*indicatesta*s*calsignificanceat1%,5%and10%respec*vely.
Interpretation of Restriction Discount
§ H&SandBajajetal.es*materestric*ondiscounttobe13.5%and7.23%respec*vely.§ AUercontrollingallfactorsthatincreaseprivateplacementdiscount,istherestric*ondiscountsolelyduetoDLOM?§ H&Sarguesthatitisnotbecauseenforcedholdingperiodforrestrictedstocksincen*vesmoreduediligencebytheinvestor(moremonitoringaUerthepurchase)§ Consistentlywiththisargument,H&Sfindthatplacementsofrestrictedstocksareassociatedwithanaddi*onal7.8%stockpriceincreasecomparedtotheeffectofunrestrictedshares.§ Thisevidencesuggestthatrestric*ondiscountisonlyanupperboundforDLOM.
Evolution of Literature
publicshare restrictedshare
Step1
publicshare
restrictedshare
Step2,Wruck
DLOM
unrestrictedshare
DLOM
privateplacementdiscount
*Darkbluebarsrepresentshareprices
Evolution of Literature
Step3,Bajaj
publicshare
restrictedshare
Step4,H&S
unrestrictedshare
privateplacementdiscount
publicshare
restrictedshare
unrestrictedshare
privateplacementdiscount
DLOMrestric*ondiscount>DLOM
*Darkbluebarsrepresentshareprices
Practitioner’s View
§ Academicliteraturestudiesprivateplacementsandnotmuchinterestedinrestric*ondiscountorDLOM.§ Prac**onersmostlysupportrestrictedstockstudiesandcri*cizeregressionmodels.Forinstance,WillameheValua*on2014:- LowR2- Omihedvariablebias- Interpreta*onofregressioncoefficients:“thesta*s*calsignificanceofacoefficientdoesnothingtosupporttheaccuracyofthenumericalvalueofthecoefficient”
- Cannotextrapolatetheresultsofaregression- Variousdegreesofregistra*on
§ Problemsstatedabovedonotjus*fytouseaveragediscountasameasureofDLOM.
Concluding Remarks-Firm Specific Discount
§ Anothercri*cismfromprac**oner’sliteraturewhichisinlinewiththesugges*onsinIRSDLOMJobAidorDamodaran2005:DLOMshouldvaryacrossfirmssoavaluatorshouldnotusetheresultsfromanyoftheanaly*calstudieswithoutgelngbehindthedata.§ Damodaran2005:- Liquidityofassetsownedbythefirm- Financialhealthofthefirm- Possibilityofgoingpublicinthefuture- Sizeofthefirm- Controlcomponent
§ ButthevariablesthataffectDLOMisopentodisputeaswellandmodelsthates*matefirmspecificDLOMhaveseriousweaknesses,too.
Conclusion
§ Restrictedstockstudiesaresupportedbyprac**oner’sliteratureandcitedinreports.§ Academicliteraturestudiesprivateplacementsbutnotmuchinterestedines*ma*ngdiscountinrestrictedstocks.So,thereislimitedevidenceintheacademicliterature.
§ Thereisnotaconsensusaboutthepropermodeltoes*mateDLOMbutthereissolidempiricalevidencerepor*ngdiscountsinallprivateplacementsandthefollowingstockpriceincrease.
§ PrivateplacementtheoriesneedtobeconsideredifDLOMises*matedusingrestrictedstocks.