disaster risk reduction strategy and plan of action … anglisht_1-1.pdf · disaster risk reduction...

1DISASTER RISK REDUCTION STRATEGY AND PLAN OF ACTION 2016 - 2020

Republika e KosovësRepublika Kosova-Republic of Kosovo

Qeveria – Vlada – Government

Ministria e Punëve të Brendshme / MinistarstvoUnutrasnjihPoslova /MinistryofInternalAffairs

Agjencia e Menaxhimit Emergjent/AgencijaEmergentnogUpravljanja/EmergencyManagementAgency

DISASTER RISK REDUCTION STRATEGY AND plAN

Of ACTION 2016 - 2020

2 DISASTER RISK REDUCTION STRATEGY AND PLAN OF ACTION 2016 - 2020


MESSAGE fROM ThE MINISTER Of INTERNAl AffAIRS Of ThE REpUblIC Of KOSOvODRRS aims to reduce the existing risks and prevent new risks, empower sustainability, including the country’s primary responsibility to prevent and reduce the disaster risks, and engagement of the whole society and government institutions. The scope of DRRS is significantly expanded and focused on the natural risks and environmental and technological related risks.

Natural disasters and technological disasters are rapidly and intensively increasing; significantly hampering the progress towards the sustainable development; generating new risks; increase of disaster related losses that have an economic, social, health, cultural and environmental impact. The facts show that the exposure of persons and assets, in all countries, has rapidly increased rather than the overall vulnerability decreased.

DRRS is a cross-cutting, comprehensive, achievable, effective and efficient strategy aiming to reduce the NDTD risks. To understand this, the disaster risk management, for governmental of-ficials at all levels, civil society, communities and volunteers as well as the private sector, must be increased through exchange of experiences, lessons learnt, best practices and training and education on disaster risk reduction, including the use of existing mutual mechanisms of train-ing, education and learning.

International, regional, cross-regional and cross-border cooperation remains important in sup-porting the efforts of countries, their national and local authorities, as well as the business com-munities on disaster risk reduction. Taking this into consideration and in order to reduce disaster risk, there is a need to address the existing challenges and preparations for future challenges, focusing on monitoring, assessment and understanding of risk disaster and exchange of such information and on how is created the disaster risk management strengthening and coordination of all institutions and relevant sectors and full and meaningful participation of stakeholders in relevant levels.

Prevention of new risks and reduction of current disaster risks, through implementation of inte-grated and overwhelming economic, structural, legal, social, health, cultural, educational, envi-ronmental, technological, political and institutional measures that prevent and reduce the ex-posure and vulnerability from disaster risks, increase the preparedness, response and recovery, hence strengthening sustainability.

The Republic of Kosovo, as a new developing country, needs increase of coordinated, sustainable and proper international support and disaster risk reduction, knowing the facing with specific challenges for development and strengthening of domestic prevention, preparation, rehabilita-tion and recovery capacities, therefore, international, regional, cross-regional and cross-border cooperation remains important in supporting the efforts of the central and local governing au-thorities, as well as the business communities on disaster risk reduction. For that reason, the insti-tutions of the Republic of Kosovo must cooperate with development international financial insti-tutions, such as the World Bank and regional banks, and should analyse the goals of this strategy for provision of financial support and loans for integrated disaster risk reduction in the country.


Disaster risk reduction is a cost-effective investment in prevention of future losses. Effective di-saster management contributes to sustainable development. The country must improve its ca-pacities on disaster risk management. The institutions of the Republic of Kosovo and other central and local jurisdictions will be mainly responsible for the implementation of DRRS.

Minister of internal Affairs of the Republic of KosovoPristina, December 2015


CONTENT:

List of Abbreviations ................................................................................................................................................. 6Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................... 7Introduction ................................................................................................................................................................. 8CHAPTER I: Methodology ...................................................................................................................................... 10CHAPTER II: Background ........................................................................................................................................ 11CHAPTER III: Strategic framework ...................................................................................................................... 20Vision on Natural Disaster Risk Reduction ........................................................................................................ 20Mission ........................................................................................................................................................................... 20 Goals ............................................................................................................................................................................... 203.1. Strategic goals and Measure to be taken .................................................................................................. 20CHAPTER IV: Considered Alternatives .............................................................................................................. 25CHAPTER V: Legal and institutional framework ............................................................................................. 26CHAPTER VI: Monitoring and evaluation ......................................................................................................... 33Bibliography ................................................................................................................................................................. 36The aim of the Action Plan for DRRS ................................................................................................................... 38


LIST OF ABBREVIATION

CEFTA The Central European Free Trade Agreement EMA Emergency Management AgencyDPPA Declaration of Mid Term Priority PoliciesDRR Disaster Risk Reduction HFA Hyogo Framework for Action HIK Hydrometeorology Institute of Kosovo IEMS Integrated Emergency Management SystemIPA Instrument for Pre-AccessionMAFRD Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Rural Development MCR Ministry of Communities and Returnees MCYS Ministry of Culture, Youth and Sports MED Ministry of Economic Development MEI Ministry of European IntegrationMESP Ministry of Environment and Spatial PlanningMEST Ministry of Education, Science and TechnologyMF Ministry of FinanceMFA Ministry of Foreign AffairsMH Ministry of HealthMI Ministry of InfrastructureMIA Ministry of Internal Affairs MLGA Ministry of Local Government Administration MPA Ministry of Public AdministrationMWSW Ministry of Work and Social Welfare NDOD Natural disasters and other disastersNJPZSH Specialized Units for Fire fighting and RescueKSF Kosovo Security ForcesOPM the Office of Prime Minister PLANAT National Platform for Natural Hazards RCK Red Cross of KosovaSFA Sendai Framework for Action SPRA Structures for protection-rescue and AidUNDP United Nations Development ProgrammeUNICEF the United Nations Children’s Fund UNISDR the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction WTO World Trade Organization


EXECUTIvE SUMMARYNatural disasters in Kosovo present a great risk for the life, wealth, environment and cultural heritage of its citizens. In fact, the whole process of economic and social development of the country is vulnerable to natural disaster risks, which often cost millions of Euros to the economy, and especially affecting the community in need. Being a new country, Kosovo has not yet built full capacities for natural disaster risk reduction at all stages of the emergency management. This strategy that includes the period 2016 - 2020 is a substantial document aiming to coordinate the work of actors in the local level, relevant ministries as well as the foreign and local donors to reduce disaster risk and at the same time contribut-ing to sustainable development for Kosovo. This document is the first strategy on risk reduction in the Republic of Kosovo and as such will serve as a baseline on which the disaster risk reduction programme will be built and activities coordinated for coming years.

The main goals of this strategy (2016 - 2020) are the following:

•Integration of risk reduction in development policies and plans, as well as oversight;•Strengthening of risk management capacities by NDOD;•Creation of safe and resilient communities from disasters; •Awareness raising and urging of institutions and entities for the risks from NDOD.

Added value of the strategy will be that for the first time Kosovo will have a single document that contains all fields related to natural and technological disaster risk reduction. The strategy also is in compliance with the international standards; furthermore its goals are in line with the Sendai Framework Action, as well as the European Strategy for Supporting Disaster Risk Reduction in de-veloping countries (2009). The DRR is related to the Declaration of Medium-term Policies Priority (DMPP) of the Government of the Republic of Kosovo 2014-2016, defines the framework for the policies and projects which the Government of the Republic of Kosovo plans to implement during the future medium-term period 2014-2016. Chapter 2 “Good governance”, Article 3.2 Strengthen-ing and implementation of the law, “Managing emergency situations will continue with the exist-ing policies: building of operational capacities.”1

The strategy is in compliance with global efforts and the requests placed by the international com-munity and the European Commission, as a global effort within the United Nations Programme for Disaster Risk Reduction and Global Warming.

The following chapters will be focused on the main issues that lead to decisions to set actions for risk reduction in Kosovo. The First Chapter elaborates the methodology used to draft this strategy. The Second Chapter describes the profiles of disasters in Kosovo outlining the essential problems addressed in this document. The Third Chapter contains the priorities of this strategy starting with the vision, mission, strategic objectives and measures by which the success of this strategy will be measured. The Fourth and Fifth Chapter investigate, discuss and require alternative solutions, and the legal and institutional context upon which the strategy is based on. The Sixth Chapter elaborates and highlights the policies deriving from this strategy, which are included in the action plan reflecting activities, duties and responsibilities of relevant institutions, measuring indicators, time frames and cost. Finally, the Seventh Chapter provides monitoring and evaluation criteria to ensure successful implementation of the DRR Strategy.

1 Kosovo Government, 2013, Declaration of Medium-term Policies Priority 2014-2016.


INTRODUCTIONAfter declaration of Independence, on 17 February 2008, the Republic of Kosovo undertook “the obligations of responsible membership at the international Community” and accepted to “abide by the principles of the United Nations Charter, the Helsinki Final Act, other actions of the Orga-nization on Security and Cooperation in Europe, and the international legal obligations and prin-ciples of international comity that mark the relations among states.”

Kosovo has achieved success in many aspects of its development, such as: political and economic stability, amendment of legislation, building of security infrastructure and the emergency man-agement capacities turning into a factor of stability in the region.

Based on the Law on EMA2, the Emergency Management Agency (EMA)/MIA is the main insti-tution responsible for coordination and management of emergency situations and Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR), which coordinates and cooperates closely with the central and local institutions, NGOs, civil society, private sector, etc.

Kosovo already has become part of economic integration in the region, aiming to expand its mar-ket further more. The purpose is to increase the level of competitiveness in economy by increasing its exporting capacity to reduce the trade deficit that Kosovo currently has. As an important place for business development, Kosovo offers a set of comparative advantage such as: young very well qualified population, significant natural resources, viable climate conditions, new infrastructure, and geographic position with access to the regional market of CEFTA and the European Union, a place that inspires other powerful economic-financial mechanisms, such as World Trade Organiza-tion (WTO), etc.

Kosovo has a rich cultural heritage from the antique citizenships to the current one, which inherits a rich cultural treasury that is integral part of the world cultural heritage. This rich heritage is in every part of Kosovo, such as: parks and archaeological and natural centres, art galleries, photog-raphy and film archives, castles and fortresses, cult monuments and settlements, cobalt and alleys, fountains and its museums, artefact collections, artisan works, etc.

Central institutions and other relevant entities at the state level that were closely consulted for this strategy include: the Office of Prime Minister (OPM), Ministry of Environment and Spatial Plan-ning (MESP), Hydrometeorology Institute of Kosovo (HIK), Red Cross of Kosova (RCK), Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST), Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Rural Develop-ment (MAFRD), Ministry of Health (MH), Ministry of Economic Development (MED), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNISDR), the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), private sector, Business Alliance, etc.

The emergency situations caused by NDOD or human activities endanger the lives of people ev-ery day and causes losses of material goods. The disaster risk exists in all societies as disasters impact in the reduction of development trends of the society in general, whereas their occur-rence in a country may cause losses not only to the country affected by the disaster but also in a broader area. Interweaving of abovementioned factors requires drafting of a National Strategic Document/Plan, at a country level, on natural disaster risk reduction and preparedness for a bet-

2 Law on Emergency Management Agency, Nr. 2004/ 04/L-230.


ter response in the Republic of Kosovo, which includes prevention, preparedness, response and recovery stages.

This strategy that includes the period 2016 - 2020 is closely linked to the below objective of the Kosovo Government related natural disasters3:

- Specific objective in the area coping with civil emergency.- Conducting separate studies in order to prevent emergencies from natural disasters, as

well as the preparation and enhancement of the capacities for response to emergencies.

The basis for DRR Strategy is found in the Law No. 04/-L-027 on protection against natural and other disasters, AI 02/2012, as well as the Document of the Risk Assessment of Natural and Other Disasters that was drafted pursuant to the Regulation No 28/2012. The DRR Strategy (2016 - 2020) is also in compliance with national and international documents, such as: Strategic Document of the Republic of Kosovo, Integrated Emergency Management Sys-tem (IEMS), Security Strategy, Strategy on Climate Change 2014-2020, Sustainable Development Goals set pursuant to the United Nations and within the Sendai Framework for Action 2015-2030: Development of national sustainability and community in natural and other disasters, etc. Apart from this, when drafting the National Strategy, European Union Internal Security Strategy and the European Strategy for Supporting Disaster Risk Reduction in developing countries were also taken into account.4 The DRR Strategy will also serve as a guideline of Kosovo for membership to “European Forum for Disaster Risk Reduction.”

3 Kosovo Government, 2013, Program of the Kosovo Republic Government 2015-2018, http://www . kryeministri-ks.net/repository/docs/programi_i_qeverise_shqip_.pdf., accessed on December 11, 2015

4 UNISDR, Preventionweb, http://www.preventionweb.net/ipadrr/, accessed on December 11, 2015.


CHAPTER I:

METhODOlOGYTo draft the DRR Strategy, Kosovo was supported by United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), and consulted professional experts of the National Platform for Natural Hazards (PLA-NAT) of the Swiss Confederate, benefiting from the best practices and as well as professional study visits/experience exchange were conducted.

By Decision 05/10, on 29.10.2014, the Chief Emergency Management Agency approved estab-lishing of a working group to draft the strategy with the representatives of the following entities: Emergency Management Agency/Ministry of Internal Affairs, the Office of Prime Minister, Ministry of Local Governance, Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Ministry of Agriculture, For-estry and Rural Development, Ministry of Finances, Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning, Ministry of Health, Ministry of European Integration, whereas in the capacity of experts there are UNDP officials and inter-ministerial water council. Aiming a multidisciplinary risk reduction ap-proach and integration of these phenomena in the country’s development policies and plans, the working group, after a three day seminar, met regularly on monthly basis to supervise the progress and plan the future steps. Ministries and other relevant institutions, which are not part of the working group, were consulted, such as: Ministry of Health, Agency of Food and Veterinary, Agency for Protection from Radiation and Nuclear Protection, etc. so that the strategy would be as comprehensive and meaningful as possible.

The group of experts from PLANAT always, at different stages of the strategy development, pro-vided consultancy about the content of the strategy. Finally, some phenomena such as climate change, ionizing and flooding are not dealt within this strategy, as they are covered by relevant sector strategies.


CHAPTER II:

bACKGROUND

2.4.1. Problem

This strategy deals specifically with the Natural and Technological Disaster Risk Reduction. Kosovo is exposed and significantly vulnerable to natural and technological disasters. In the territory of Kosovo these are distinguished seismic areas: Ferizaj-Viti-Gjilan, Skenderaj, Mitrovica, Peja-Gjako-va- Prizren-Dragash and Kopaonik. The highest expected magnitudes are: Ferizaj-Viti-Gjilan (6.5), Skenderaj (5.0), Mitrovica (5.0), Peja-Gjakova-Prizren-Dragash (6.6) and Kopaonik (6.0).5

The last earthquake in Istog with the highest strike occurred in 2010 in the western part of the country and reached magnitude 5.2. In April 2002, Gjilan was struck by an earthquake of magni-tude 5.5 that caused significant damages to the infrastructure and material goods. According to the Seismologic Institute, around 10 earthquakes with low intensity are registered every day in the country6.

The natural disasters that frequently strike and risk Kosovo are: flooding, fires, geological, biologi-cal and meteorological events. The recent database with historical data developed in 2015”DesIn-ventar Kosova”7shows the main natural and other disaster risks in Kosovo. In total, according to DesInventar findings, approximately 14400 persons are affected by disaster every year, around 1÷2 persons lose their lives, whereas the economic damages reach €8.5 million with 1228 houses and 1261 hectares of land struck by disasters. Kosovo is affected by natural disasters as follows: forest fires (74 %), mainly in Prishtina, Kamenica and Deçan; flooding (82%), mainly in Ferizaj, Ra-hovec and Skënderaj;Meteorological events (39%) specifically in Podujeva, Ferizaj and Gjakova. Natural disasters are considered as phenomena that affect the security and lawful state.8Taking into account the low level of social and economic development, as well as the increasing envi-ronmental problems, natural risk disaster in Kosovo is considered to have significant damages to socio-economic development.9

5 The Government of Kosovo, 2009, Risk Assessment against Natural and other Disasters, 6 UNDP, 2011, Report on DRR Assessment Capacities.7 Emergency Management Agency, 2015, DesInventarKosovo, http://desinventar.cimafoundation.org/DesInventar/

profiletab.jsp?countrycode=rks&continue=y, accessed on December 11, 2015.8 The Government of Kosovo, 2014, Analysis of Strategic Security Sector.9 Zupka , 2014, , Integration of Risk Reduction for Investments.


2.4.2.Background of natural and technological disaster risk

The effort to reduce natural disaster risks in Kosovo, same as in the world, is a problem that de-teriorated in the last 15 years of transition, that is due to the phenomenon of climate change, in-dustrialization of the country, damages caused during the war, informal settlements, lack of plans and non-implementation of environment protection measures, forestry and riverbeds degrada-tion and waste disposal. Based on the statistics provided by DesInventar10, the number of disasters marked an increasing trend by years in 1999÷2014, starting with the overview of the forest fires below:

chart 1. time trends of forest fires in 1999÷2014 (DesInventar Kosova , 2014).

10 Emergency Management Agency, 2015, DesInventarKosovo, http://desinventar.cimafoundation.org/DesInventar/profiletab.jsp?countrycode=rks&continue=y, accessed on December 11, 2015.

450

360

270

180

90

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

70

56

42

28

14

1921

1927

1933

1939

1945

1951

1957

1963

1969

1975

1981

1987

1993

1999

2005

2011

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

5

4

7

6

3

2

1

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2700000

2160000

1620000

1080000

540000

1486

1517

1548

1579

1610

1641

1672

1703

1734

1765

1796

1827

1858

1889

1920

1951

1982

2013

2

3

1

Data Cards


chart 2. time trends of forest fires in 1916÷2015.

As for flash floods and flooding the same trend is noticed, where phenomena is increasing on yearly basis, almost 90% of a total of 264 occurrences that occurred in 2000÷2014. Overall the number of occurrences is increasing reaching the maximum quota (68 events) in 2006. In the last 15 years, at least one flooding occurred each year in the country, approximately 18 events per year.

chart 3: time trends of landslides: 2000-2014.

450

360

270

180

90

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

201470

56

42

28

14

1921

1927

1933

1939

1945

1951

1957

1963

1969

1975

1981

1987

1993

1999

2005

2011

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

5

4

7

6

3

2

1

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2700000

2160000

1620000

1080000

540000

1486

1517

1548

1579

1610

1641

1672

1703

1734

1765

1796

1827

1858

1889

1920

1951

1982

2013

2

3

1

450

360

270

180

90

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

70

56

42

28

14

1921

1927

1933

1939

1945

1951

1957

1963

1969

1975

1981

1987

1993

1999

2005

2011

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

5

4

7

6

3

2

1

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2700000

2160000

1620000

1080000

540000

1486

1517

1548

1579

1610

1641

1672

1703

1734

1765

1796

1827

1858

1889

1920

1951

1982

2013

2

3

1

Data Cards

Data Cards


Based on the natural disaster history, landslides marked a gradual increase especially in 2012-2014, by approximately 2 occurrences per year.

chart 4. Time trends of earthquakes, period: 1456-2014.

The earthquakes in 1851 ÷ 2013 also reflect an increasing trend in the last 20 years. However, this could also be as a consequence of lack of data prior to 1993, when only large scale natural disas-ters were registered.

In terms of monetary terms data from past disasters also from DesInventar reflect an increasing trend of economic losses since 2000. For instance this is demonstrated in the following graph on floods for the period 2000-2014.

chart 5: Economic losses (in EUr) from floods in the time period 2000-2014 according to DesInventar

450

360

270

180

90

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

70

56

42

28

14

1921

1927

1933

1939

1945

1951

1957

1963

1969

1975

1981

1987

1993

1999

2005

2011

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

5

4

7

6

3

2

1

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2700000

2160000

1620000

1080000

540000

1486

1517

1548

1579

1610

1641

1672

1703

1734

1765

1796

1827

1858

1889

1920

1951

1982

2013

2

3

1

450

360

270

180

90

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

70

56

42

28

14

1921

1927

1933

1939

1945

1951

1957

1963

1969

1975

1981

1987

1993

1999

2005

2011

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

5

4

7

6

3

2

1

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2700000

2160000

1620000

1080000

540000

1486

1517

1548

1579

1610

1641

1672

1703

1734

1765

1796

1827

1858

1889

1920

1951

1982

2013

2

3

1

Data Cards

Losses Local


2.4.3. Comparison with regional countries

Kosovo, being a country in transition as a result of 1998-1999 war and with a low economic and social development, faces more challenges as far as DRR is concerned. Compared to the regional countries, such as: Albania, Montenegro, Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo established new state institutions, which mainly started prioritizing more the DRR by the end of 2000s.

In general, as mentioned, due to low economic, social and environmental development, natural disaster risk for Kosovo is significant because of high probability of population that may be af-fected (high vulnerability).


2.4.4. Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats analysis

STRENGTHS:

1. The applicable legislation1sets the duties, responsibilities and mechanisms of institu-tional coordination.

2. EMA is a coordinating institution for NDOD in Kosovo.

3. The program of the Government of the Re-public of Kosovo includes DRR in the Dec-laration of Medium-term Policies Priority 2014-2016.

4. There is a vast spectre of governmental and non-governmental institutions involved and active in the area of DRR.

5. Adjustment of the program and plan of ac-tivities to increase the awareness of both levels of governance about NDOD.

6. There are national basic documents: Docu-ment of the Risk Assessment of Natural and Other Disasters Document on Risk Assess-ment (national and local level) and the Na-tional Response Plan.

7. Public and private institutions of high edu-cation provide accredited courses on DRR.

8. MEST approved the Kosovo Curricula Frame-work and the Core Curricula.

9. Kosovo institutions carried out activities on DRR, but they were not defined as such.

WEAKNESSES:

1. The DRR system including laws, policies and regulations is still unconsolidated.

2. Kosovo institutions lack capacities for man-agement of natural and other disasters.2

3. Kosovo has more mechanisms focusing on emergency management of natural and oth-er disasters, instead of their prevention and reduction.

4. Disaster Risk reduction in not included suffi-ciently in government plans and policies

5. There is a lack of clear mechanisms of respon-sibility and accountability for implementation of laws and policies related to DRR.

6. DRR is not yet a priority of the government for allocation of necessary means from the national budget, including prevention, pre-paredness, response and recovery.

7. There are insufficient technical and organiza-tional capacities for natural and other disas-ters risk management including early notifi-cation and alert system

8. Inter-institutional coordination on DRR is still at its early stage.

9. DRR statistics and database are still very lim-ited.

10. Lack of access to live data including the lo-cation and space data, such as Geographic Information System (GIS) on DRR.

11. Little implementation of awareness activi-ties and community awareness for creating a safe and resilient community

12. Traditional knowledge and practices are not sufficiently integrated in the DRR system.


OPPORTUNITIES

1. Kosovo aims to implement the Sendai Framework for Action (2015-2030).

2. There is a bilateral agreement for support with Turkey, Croatia, as well as agreements for cooperation with Macedonia and Alba-nia.

3. The Disaster Inventory Management System (DesInventar) in order to consistently draft policies and plans.

4. Supplement of the current legal framework with broader inclusion of the emergency management cycle: prevention, prepared-ness, response and recovery.

5. Inclusion of risk assessment in the develop-ment plans.

6. Development and coordination of warning and early warning and alert system at all levels of governance.

7. Inclusion of Euro-codes and seismic micro zonation, as well as the scientific researches in the development (spatial, urban, infra-structural, etc.) plans.

8. The presence of international organisations provides a good opportunity for support of and implementation of this strategy.

THREATS

1. Low level of economic and social develop-ment is one of the indicators that disasters in Kosovo might have major consequences.

2. Insufficient funding of DRR in the govern-ment and foreign donors’ programmes.

3. Kosovo is not a member of UN and relevant international mechanisms, which causes the lack of funds and means benefited from differ-ent grants of the international programmes for DRR capacity building.

4. Construction infrastructure and treating of river banks as a result of lack of urban plan-ning and concrete projects does not meet the DRR requirements.

5. Non-implementation of applicable legal pro-visions increases natural and other disaster risks.

6. Overload of inter-institutional coordinating mechanisms with bureaucratic and admin-istrative formalities, which would decelerate the flow of information and decision making.

7. Listing of new risks is a continuous challenge. 8. Non-implementation of strategy in the whole

territory of Kosovo.

This strategy specifically addresses these problems related to Kosovo’s capacities to cope with natural disasters:

- Lack of inclusion of disaster risk reduction in development policies and plans.11

- There is a need for capacity building and strengthening of governmental institutions in early warning.12

- The need of drafting, developing of programmes and trainings to establish secure and sus-tainable anti-disaster communities.

- Listing of new risks, analysis and prevention measures are a continuous challenge for suc-cessful implementation of this strategy.

11 Zupka, 2014, Integration of Risk Reduction for Investments.12 The Government of Kosovo, 2014, Analysis of Strategic Security Sector.


2.4.5. Addressing by the Government

The Government of Kosovo is committed to undertake all necessary measures to address above-mentioned issues, also accounting for the support of the strategic international partners, such as the organisations: United Nations, European Union, bilateral and multilateral agreements as well the donors.

2.4.6. Existing and planned activities

The Emergency Management Agency, as a coordinating body of DRR carried out some activities in this area with agencies that are planned to also continue in the period covered by this strategy, such as:

Early warning system

EMA will, in cooperation with the Hydrometeorology Institute of Kosovo (HIK) and the Kosovo Geological Survey/Division of Seismology, institutions responsible for monitoring and early warn-ing of natural events that cause natural disasters, establish an effective system of electronic com-munication between these two institutions and EMA, in regard to early warning of natural di-sasters, so that it could serve EMA for drafting of a natural disaster plan and risk prevention or reduction activities, in cases when these disasters are alerted by the responsible institutions.

Establishment of a history of natural disaster data - DesInventar

EMA in cooperation with the organisations of the United Nations (UNDP and UNISDR) established the first historic database on Kosovo natural disasters -DesInventar, which will be a starting point for analysing the key factors and will serve to the governmental institutions and scientific re-searchers to draft DRR plans and prevention measures.

Public communication and awareness of citizens on DRR

The central institutions support the local governance and developing communities on implemen-tation of risk reduction plans, response mechanisms, training of response teams in the community and risk mapping. EMA continuously updates DesInventar with data from the governmental and local institutions and informs the public continuously by updating its web site (http://ame.rks-gov.net/) with the latest information on emergency events and effects in the country.

Addressing the risk factors

In the spirit of Sendai Framework, EMA coordinates relevant cross-cultural mechanisms against natural and other disasters in Kosovo through the Inter-ministerial Council and the Secretariat for monitoring of development of the strategy and action plan.


Human capacity building

EMA continuously, through trainings and courses, supports the key players of relevant central and local institutions whose responsibility and duty is the emergency management.

International cooperation

EMA is a participant in international projects: - Building resilience to disasters in the Balkans and Turkey13including the support for region-

al capacity building in the area of cross-border and cross-regional cooperation, as well as the exchange of information.

- The EU IPA Programme on Civil Protection14aiming to provide/exchange the best practices from EU countries and the region on the early alert system, monitoring, support of the host countries and emergency operational centres -112.

- UNDP/UN is committed through its project: Kosovo Disaster Risk Reduction Initiative and other future projects to continue supporting and strengthening of governing capacities at central and local level, as necessary.

- The European Commission, through IPA Programme (Civil Protection II and Flooding) will continuously support the Government of Kosovo in effective disaster management by ex-changing experiences with other neighbouring countries and through practical desk exer-cises.

- The Red Cross Federation will support the community assisting with: response against di-sasters, monitoring and reporting through its volunteers.

- International organizations: UNICEF, Save the Children and UNDP will continue the support through school programmes and other activities at the education institutions for imple-mentation of DRR.

13 UNISDR, Preventionweb, http://www.preventionweb.net/ipadrr/, accessed on December 11, 2015.14 European Union, Program of the European Instrument for Cooperation on Civil Protection for accession and po-

tential candidate countries, http://www.ipacivilprotection.eu/index.html, accessed on December 11, 2015.


CHAPTER III:

STRATEGIC fRAMEWORKVISION – development of a fruitful, effective and comprehensive system for natural and techno-

logical disaster risk reduction, integrated emergency management system that would contribute in the increase of security and sustainable development in the country.

MISSION– Development of an integrated system for protection and rescue, creation of conditions for building of a sustainable society to confront natural and technological disasters in the Republic of Kosovo.

PURPOSE- of the Strategy is to contribute in achieving the sustainable development, integration of disaster risk reduction to development plans and policies and community capacity building to confront with disasters.

SCOPE- the Strategy focuses on natural disasters and other types of disasters including techno-logical Disasters that affect Kosovo. A full list of these threats are included in the Docu-ment for the Risk Assessment15 devised in 2009 and revised in 2016. Regarding critical infrastructure and other security threats these will be dealt with in other legislation16 that is currently being drafted and hence not included in this strategy.

3.1. STRATEGIC GOAlS AND MEASURES TO bE TAKEN

STRATEGIC GOALS1. Integration of risk reduction to development plans and policies

and oversight

There is no appropriate environment as: disaster mechanisms ne to be strengthened especially those related to DRR, political engagement of the institutions is low and also there is no budget for DRR. Institutions have no specific capacities for natural and other disasters and laws and strategies are not properly followed up with monitoring mechanisms.

The Disaster Risk Reduction Strategy determines the will of the Institutions of the Republic of Kosovo for cooperation, coordination and unified approach of the central and local institutions and international partnership to confront with natural and technical-technological disasters, and the challenges resulting from them.

15 The Government of Kosovo, 2016, Risk Assessment against Natural and other Disasters.16 The Government of Kosovo, 2016, Draft Law on Critical Infrastructure and its Protection.


Disaster risk reduction is not a separate science, but it is closely related to all development poli-cies and processes of a state. Development of developmental policies and plans both at central and local level, taking also into account the role of private sector and civil society, requires multi-dimensional and proper involvement in the area of disaster risk reduction, especially in the area of spatial planning, developmental plans, implementation of construction codes, climatic adapta-tion, health, infrastructure, agriculture and forestry, education, etc. By including the integration of plans and policies by line ministries at a higher level for DRR is in compliance with the interna-tional standards.

2. Strengthening of capacities for natural and other disaster risk management

Risk governance, according to Sendai Framework,17 should be built by understanding disaster risk including the aspects of risk, vulnerability and capacity building.

With reference to the SWOT analysis, understanding the natural and other disaster risk phenom-ena remains insufficient for Kosovo institutions, especially towards the emergency response. Also there is a lack of support and sense of understanding that natural and other disasters must be priority in capacity development, leaving it with less financial and human support. The new risks are also not analysed appropriately and the natural and other disaster risks assessments in the municipal plans are not carried out according to the standards, therefore, human and technical capacity building is important, as well as the clear determination of the roles and responsibilities of the DRR system.

Strengthening of DRR system requires investments in scientific and technical capacities and treat-ment as an essential component for economic and social development to produce the necessary effects with alert information that is registered, researched, predicted, analysed and modelled for disasters that might threaten the country, it is of special importance that the scientific institutions dealing with monitoring, processing and researching of the causes of natural disasters to enable an effective prevention and as less damages as possible from natural disasters.

DRR system to be strengthened in the aspect of monitoring, assessment and promotion of data related to risks/disasters in a comprehensive manner that would enable further researches and development of the system.

3. Creation of safe and resilient communities from disasters

Disasters take a higher toll at communities unprepared to confront with natural and other disas-ters. In order to have a community safe and resilient from disasters, there is a need to raise the level of institutional and social awareness with long-term awareness programme approaches and con-crete investments in many fields, such as: education and school curricula, disaster management in

17 United Nations, 2015, Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030, http://www.unisdr.org/inform/publications/43291, accessed on December 11, 2015.


the community and the use of knowledge and research to build a sustainable society.

Taking into account the social, gender, economic and cultural diversity aspect in Kosovo, special attention should be given to the most vulnerable communities, such as: persons with disabilities, communities that live in extreme poverty, communities concentrated in natural disaster areas as well as the drafting of plans and programmes with the purpose of educating and raising aware-ness of the communities, especially of the children and the new generation. Scrutiny of these plans and programmes as well as their pragmatic, practical and careful implementation and insti-tutional commitment, both the central and local level, followed with an awareness and outreach campaign, through portals, media, leaflets, radio, newspapers, social networks, etc. provides for the creation of a safe and resilient community, but sustainable, towards disasters.

4. Awareness raising and urging of institutions and entities about natural and other disaster risks

Kosovo, as a developing new country, with new institutions and systems, some of them with pro-found fragility, but with a clear aim for sustainable strengthening and functionalizing, with pre-conditions and opportunities for a rapid development in many areas, faces with unexpected chal-lenges both in the natural disaster and technical-technological aspects.

Awareness raising and urging of institution sand institutional mechanisms through legal regula-tions, incentives and persuasive innovations, researches and scientific works, provision and al-location of necessary financial and logistical resources, as well as undertaking of structural and non-structural measures for better management of risks.

Promotion of protocols, exchange of information and regional cooperation to facilitate the ex-change of capacities and the creation of facilities for emergency response during and after disas-ters.

Encouraging policies and programmes that address development of standards, concrete plans, human and material mobility to establish the SPRA, and their training.

Promotion of mobilization, organization, certification and structuring of the private sector, civil society, different organisations and associations for professional support in the area of search-rescue, health, etc.

Migration of population, especially expansion and over-population of cities and rapid technical-technological development, may bring new phenomena and natural and technological disasters in the future, presenting threats and disasters for Kosovo.

Exploration of more advanced methods and programmes from experienced countries with more developed systems, requires coordination, exchange of information and involvement of neces-sary mechanisms of institutions, as well as the merging of these experiences and expertises into detailed plans in order to achieve the effect for risk reduction deriving from rapid development as a result of globalisation, rapid economic development, migrations, epidemics and climate change.


MEASURES TO bE TAKEN

1. Integration of risk reduction to development plans and policies and oversight

1.1. Integration of disaster risk reduction policies and implementation of legal framework for risk management and governing;

1.2. Strengthening of institutional mechanisms and capacities of responsible institutions at the central and local level for implementation of the strategy;

1.3. Lobbying for political engagement and taking of responsibilities and accountability; 1.4. Increase of financial support for disaster risk reduction; 1.5. Compliance of sector laws/policies with the risk assessment and management standards;1.6. Establishment of an oversight body for implementation of Disaster Risk Reduction Strategy.

2. Strengthening of capacities for natural and other disaster risk management

2.1. Increase of skills for generation of information (statistics and different data) on natural and other disasters;

2.2. Strengthening of capacities for collection, assessment and analysing of information, as well as continuous update of the database on natural disasters, Des-Inventar;

2.3. Expansion of new capacities of the institutions at central and local level for early alert system-izing;

2.4. Increase of inter-institutional cooperation and coordination on early alert related to natural disaster risk reduction;

2.5. Support of researches, exchange of information and cooperation with scientific and academic institutions aiming to reduce the existing risks and prevent the new risks;

2.6. Understanding disaster risk and its dimensions.

3. Creation of safe and resilientcommunities from disasters

3.1. Improvement of communication and dissemination of information between the relevant in-stitutions about natural disaster risk reduction;

3.2. Inclusion of knowledge on disaster risk reduction to the education curricula; 3.3 Awareness raising and sensitizing the community about the importance of natural disaster

risk reduction through media campaigns, social networks, trainings, exercises and protection measures;

3.4. Organization and building of structures for protection-rescue and help (SPRA);3.5. Involvement and organization of youth and civil society in SPRAin order to reduce the risk

from natural disasters;3.6. Involvement of vulnerable community (pregnant women, children, old people, persons with

chronicle disease, persons with disabilities, etc.) in drafting of plans for risk management.


4. Awareness raising and urging of institutions and entities on natural and other disaster risks

4.1. Promotion and development of instruments and programmes that draft standards, codes, operational instructions, plans, projects, etc.

4.2. Improvement of communication and exchange of information between relevant institutions in risk identification and assessment;

4.3. Deepening of integration of strategy and coordination of the activities of the relevant insti-tutions in the risk identification process, assessment and taking of protection measures;

4.4. Development of quality standards such as certification and acknowledgement for disaster risk management with participation of the private sector, civil society, organisations and associa-tions;

4.5. Promotion and support of agreements for regional and international cooperation; 4.6. Provision of quality information, assessment, developing of statistics/databases as well as

monitoring of trends related to new risks and natural disasters; 4.7. Promotion of protocols, exchange of information and regional cooperation to facilitate the

exchange of capacities and the creation of facilities for emergency response during and after disasters.


CHAPTER IV:

CONSIDERED AlTERNATIvESThis Strategy is based on the best regional and international practices that address similar prob-lems in the area of DRR:

•National Disaster Risk Reduction and Civil Protection 2014-2018,the Republic of Albania;•Croatian DRR Strategy, a strategy that is based on scientific research; •Macedonian DRR Strategy;•National Platform for Natural Disasters( PLANAT);•European Strategy for Supporting Disaster Risk Reduction in developing countries (2009).

Upon taking into consideration these models, Kosovo decided to be based on the Swiss model, a strategy that is built on its specific context and in compliance with the Sendai Framework and the European Strategy. The main model is based on the inter-ministerial working group, which drafted this Strategy on a step by step basis.


CHAPTER V:

lEGAl AND INSTITUTIONAl fRAMEWORK The document reviewed and is in line with national and international plans and strategies in the area of environment: Kosovo Climate Change Strategy (2014-2024); Strategy of Kosovo Waters; Ba-sic Document of the Republic of Kosovo; SIME; Security Strategy, Millennium Development Goals and Sendai Framework for Action (2015-2030). Furthermore, this Strategy is based on European mechanisms such as: European Union Strategy on Internal Security and European Strategy for Risk Reduction Support about natural and other disasters in the developing countries.18

The DRR Strategy us mainly based on the Law No 04/-L-027 on natural and other disasters as well as the Document of the Risk Assessment of Natural and Other Disasters Document on Risk Assessment (approved in 2009 and reviewed in 2015). During the drafting of this Strategy, the inter-ministerial working group also consulted other laws that are relevant to or contains in itself dealing with or regulation of DRR area, directly or indirectly, such as: • Law on Protection of Environment No 2009/03-L-025; • Law on Assessment of Impact in the Environment No 2010/03-L-214; • Law on Protection against Fires No 2011/04-L-012; • Law on Security Council of Kosovo No.2008/03-L050; • Law on Management of Public Finances No. 2013/04-L-194; • Law on the Ministry of Kosovo Security Corpse No 2008/03-L045; • Law on Police No 2011/04-L-076; Law on Public Health No 2007/02-L-78; • Law on Emergency Health Service No. 2006/02-L-50; • Law on Red Cross of Kosovo No. 2010/03-L-179; • Law on Local Governance No 2008/03-L-040; • Law on Spatial Planning No 2012/04-L-174; • Law No 04/l-188 on Treating of illegal constructions; • Law on Construction No 04/L-110, • Law No 2003/3 Forestry of Kosovo; Law on Environment No03/L-02 and • Law on Kosovo Waters No 2004/24.

The Strategy directly contributes in managing of natural and other disasters19as part of the Gov-ernment Plan, specifically in the objective “Conducting of separate studies to prevent natural di-saster emergencies and the preparation and improvement of the way the civil capacity reacts.”

In addition, the Government drafted the Declaration of Medium-term Policies Priority 2014-2016 where priority is given to management of emergency situations.

18 UNISDR, Preventionweb, http://www.preventionweb.net/ipadrr/, accessed on December 2015.19 Kosovo Government, 2013, Program of the Kosovo Republic Government 2015-2018, http://www . kryeministri-ks.

net/repository/docs/programi_i_qeverise_shqip_.pdf , accessed on December 11, 2015.


It will continue with the existing policies:• Increasing of action skills;• Completion of the infrastructure with necessary means and equipment, as well as the con-

struction of facilities for NJPZSH;• Support to the operations of managing the situations of disturbing of public order and

public riots; • Continuance of cooperation with the IPA Programme/European Commission on capacity

building;• Establishing of a National Centre for Emergency Situations Management; • Development of exercise programmes, and assessment of emergency preparedness in the

area of general public security.20

The roles and responsibilities of central and local institutions within DRR

Central Government

1. Ministry of Internal Affairs (MIA)

Based on the mission and duties of MIA, its role within DRRS is increase of security level and pro-tection of the citizens of the Republic of Kosovo, with special attention to the emergency manage-ment of natural disasters and other disasters.

2. Ministry of Finance (MF)

Ministry of Finance has an essential role for effective implementation of DRRS. It analyses the bud-getary requirements for implementation of DRRS and in cooperation with the Oversight Council it approves the budget.

3. Ministry of Environment of Spatial Planning (MESP)

The role of MESP, based on its mission and duties, definitely is the main responsible institution in achieving the set goals and measures of DRRS, with its oversight role and active participation in monitoring of the strategy.

MESP, through DRRS aims to develop integrating policies of many different sectors in order to create the conditions for protection of health and environment from natural disasters and oth-er disasters in the areas of radioactive radiation, construction, pollution of air, water and land, measuring of atmospheric rainfalls, surface and underground waters, alerting of occurrence of elementary hydrometeorology disasters, etc. as well as providing of scientific and professional support on environmental policies of the country.

20 Kosovo Government, 2013, Declaration of Medium-term Policies Priority 2014-2016.


4. Ministry of Economic Development (MED)The role of MED in implementation of DRRS includes activities in: the Sector of Energy and Mines, the Sector of Energy Efficiency and Sources of Renewable Energy, the Geologic Service of Kosovo, Postal Sector, the Telecommunication Sector, the Sector of Information Technology.

5. Kosovo Security Force (KSF) The role of KSF in implementation of DRRS includes the whole cycle of emergency management, however the primary goal of this entity is determined the preparedness and response stage, to carry out operational actions in cases of natural disaster and other disasters in Kosovo and abroad, such as: operations of civil protection within Kosovo, to support civil authorities in reacting against natural disasters and other disasters. KSF has an important role in the search and rescue opera-tions, elimination of explosives, control and clearance of hazardous subjects and other tasks re-lated to humanitarian assistance.

6. Ministry of European Integration (MEI)

The role of MEI in DRRS includes support for reforms on civil emergency area of Kosovo in its path towards the European Union. It achieves this role by aligning the policies of the Republic with those of the EU, and also approximating its legislation with acquis of EU civil emergencies. Furthermore, MEI facilitates and supports the cooperation between the local institutions and the European Commission in achieving of high standards, knowledge, responsibilities and transpar-ency in the area of civil emergency.

7. Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA)

The role of MFA is promotion and protection of national, cultural and economic policies of Kosovo in the world, development of good neighbourly relations and regional cooperation with com-mon interest, through bilateral and multilateral agreements including the area of management of emergencies, contributing in risk reduction.

This Ministry is the main contacting body of communication in case of request for provision or receiving of assistance for supporting the country struck by natural disasters and other disasters, but also for international cooperation in other activities in the area of emergency management.

8. Ministry of Infrastructure (MI)

The role of MI is providing of a technical, professional, development and organisational solution for maintenance, construction, reconstruction and security of railways, highways, national and regional roads as well as the air traffic. In order to reduce the risk from natural disasters and other disasters, it collects data on traffic and security, advises and notifies the institutions and citizens on the situation of the network of roads, railways and air traffic, as well as the factors that may have an impact in the communication network.


9. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology (MEST)

The role of MEST, in compliance with the national development priorities, is to ensure quality education system that guarantees safety and protection of pupils and school staff. This will be achieved by creating secure school environments according to necessary parameters and stan-dards for disaster risk reduction, including in the curricula contents that make the pupils and youth aware of and trained prevention and protection from disasters. MEST will have an added role in fulfilling the objectives of DRRS through capacity building at the central, local and school level in preparation for prevention, response and reduction of disaster risk. Also MEST, in cooperation and collaboration with the stakeholders and other institutions will encourage and support different incentives to help pupils, youth, teachers, school staff, as well as parents and the community to gain the necessary skills to face with different disaster situations. This would ensure a safe, healthy and sustainable environment.

10. Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Rural Development (MAFRD)

The measures to be taken by MAFRD to achieve DRRS objectives are found in the policy to assist in administration and management of forestry sector, including also protection, reforestation activi-ties, self-containment, prevention and protection from fire, disinfection against insects and differ-ent diseases, tree cutting licensing, control of hunting and fishing; provides veterinary services, including among others prevention of animal diseases, zoo zone and improvement of the quality of flock of birds, whereas in cooperation with the Ministry of Health, Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning supervises the implementation of health standards related to agriculture, for-estry, rural development, centres of fish cultivation, quality control of food and agricultural raw material in order to protect the customers.

11. Ministry of Communities and Returns (MCR)

The role of this Ministry on DRR is multidimensional, but some of its functions should be high-lighted that fall under this Ministry based on its duties and responsibilities and specifics:

- supervision of the implementation of the strategy within its scope at the central and local level, addresses to communities for help, supports development and implementation of strategy in all municipalities assisting integration of policies in the plans concerning risk reduction under equal conditions for all communities and their members;

- coordinates with ministries, municipalities and other authorities for implementation of DRRS, based on the principle of protection and self-protection in natural disasters and oth-er disasters, respecting the human rights, in order to ensure promotion and protection of rights of the members of all communities, paying special attention to women, children, the elder and other vulnerable groups;

- assists in development and implementation of measures in the field of public information and other promotion projects related to raising of public awareness on the rights and in-terests of the communities and their members about the protection from natural disasters and other disasters as well as undertaking of measures for natural disaster risk reduction in cooperation with and encouragement of the private sector and businesses.


12. Ministry of Labour and Social Welfare (MLSW)

The role of Ministry of Labour and Social Welfare in DRRS is carried out through policies, programs and documents, for which we could already say that are duty of permanent care on economic and social RR as well as with a human character. The ways to implement DRR are: strengthening and creation of space for social welfare, creation of employment and vocational training infrastructure that would increase the quality of service delivery for citizens that are in social need, also it pro-vides services for the categories of retired persons pursuant to the applicable legislation, it con-tinues the commitment towards citizens with special needs regardless of their ethnicity, religion, gender and race, from children to the old people that lack family care.

MLSW continues provision of family sheltering services for children that have no relatives and family sheltering for children that have no parental care.

It provides financial and social support, emergent and permanent, through institutions or services established for this purpose for citizens in need.

13. Ministry of Health (MH)

It follows the health situation and implements adequate measures to prevent and control prob-lems in the area of health, supporting participation, initiatives and development of activities of the community related to health and protection of environment. It participates in development and implementation of outreach campaigns and other promotional projects for adults to raise public awareness in compliance with health standards, encourages development of health educa-tion and the environment for increasing of knowledge and competences in the area of health and protection of environment. It monitors and analyzes the situation of the environment, especially the impact of the industrial activity, public services and economic activity, as they are related to the protection of environment.

In cooperation with other relevant Ministries, it identifies areas that need protection for the good of population, creates the policy of activities in the health sector to promote coherent develop-ment and implementation of measures for DRR.

14. Ministry of Culture, Youth and Sports (MCYS)

The role of Ministry of Culture, Youth and Sports in DRRS is undertaking of measures and develop-ment of activities for preservation, protection and presentation, restoring and conversation of cul-tural heritage, architectural heritage, movable heritage, spiritual heritage, Integrated Conservation and cultural panorama, as well as inventorying and documentation of cultural heritage of Kosovo.

15. Ministry of Public Administration (MPA)

Establishing of a modern, sustainable and unbiased public administration in the service of citizens and businesses and delivery of quality administrative services and functional infrastructure for governing institutions.


16. Ministry of Trade and Industry (MTI)

It provides direct technical support and advice on procurement of external consulting services to assess the structural security and the security from fire of buildings life lines (public services).

17. Ministry of Diaspora (MD)

The role of Ministry of Diaspora on DRRS is urging of scientific and techno-technological coopera-tion, exchange of experiences and the best practices for RR from NDOD of the relevant countries. Creation of conditions for capital investments by migrants in their homeland in order to reduce and prevent the NDOD risks.

18. Ministry of Local Government Administration (MLGA)

The role of MLGA on DRRS is supporting and enhancing of the local governance in strengthening the structures to supervise this strategy and ensuring implementation of the action plan activities that are related to the local level.

Other central institutions and agencies

Other central institutions and agencies play an important role in implementation of DRRS based on their mission, duties and responsibilities in the area of DRR.

Seismological Institute of Kosovo

Based on its mission the Seismological Institute of Kosovo will focus on meeting the objectives through the following priorities

1. Effective functioning of the Seismic Network of Kosovo 1.1. Continuous and accurate monitoring of seismic events in the territory of Kosovo and beyond. 1.2. Urgent notification of the state competent bodies, in case an earthquake of ≥ 3.5 magnitude

strikes within the territory of Kosovo. 1.3. Monitoring on seismicity, active seismic faults and seismic-tectonics for the territory of Kosovo.

2. Vulnerability and seismic risk analysis and studies

2.1. Seismologic and seismic-tectonic studies for a deeper knowledge of seismic activity and seis-micity in Kosovo, as well as seismic risk assessment.

2.2. Local seismic risk studies and assessment for inhabited areas, overly necessary information for physical and urban planning in the seismic areas.

2.3. Determination of mechanism of source, released energy, type and limit of the seismic source in the territory of Kosovo.


3. Preparation of maximum intensity map on annual basis

3.1. Insertion of seismic events for our territory in the MapInfo programme and separation of the surface in each 5km2 to assess the spreading of the maximum intensity, for magnitudes higher than M >1.

3.2 Implementation of maximum intensity map and epicentres of earthquakes on annual basis.

4. Seismologic services with a special social interest

4.1. Registration of earthquakes and other seismic phenomena caused by natural or artificial source. 4.2. Establishment, protection and development of monitoring seismologic network stations, re-

spectively seismographic network and the strong shakes related network.

4.3. Collection and analysis of data related to earthquakes and other seismic phenomena, their causes and consequences.

Non-Governmental and Voluntary Organizations

The role of NGOs in DRRS is supporting of state institutions by providing assistance through awareness campaigns on DRR. The voluntary organizations provide their capacities by significant-ly helping on managing of incidents at all levels.

Local government

Mayors of Municipalities

• Establish and supervise the professional working group in drafting the Municipal Docu-ment on Risk Assessment from NDOD and take care of its implementation.

•Appoint the staff of Committee for Protection and Rescue for emergency cases. • Establish/appoint professional working and supervising group for drafting of spatial and

urban planning, by drafting also concrete projects as prevention measures.• Are responsible for and tasked with other protection duties to undertake concrete mea-

sures in the area of Emergency Management.

Red Cross of Kosova

As the only national association, the Red Cross operates according to the Law on Red Cross of Kosovo Nr 2010/03-L-179 assisting local authorities on humanitarian issues in the whole country. It works with MKSF; EMA/MIA; other central, regional and local governmental entities and other NGOs to ensure raising of awareness of population and governmental institutions on DRR and coordinates integration of needs for humanitarian assistance in emergency cases.


CHAPTER VI:

MONITORING AND EvAlUATIONMonitoring and evaluation of Strategy is followed with concrete measurable and realistic indica-tors that are in compliance with the international standards.

To monitor the fulfilment of the Strategy’s targets, an Oversight Council will be established at a national level, which will be responsible for meeting the strategy’s targets of the central level insti-tutions, whose main aim is natural and other disaster risk reduction.

- The Prime Minister of the Government of the Republic of Kosovo/Minister of MIA is the oversight authority of the Council, which requires responsibilities and provides institution-al and administrative support.

- The Oversight Council is the only authority for DRRS oversight at central and local lev-el, which oversights the progress of investments, work and overall engagement towards achievement of the targets and measures of the strategy.

- The Ministries and central agencies, prepare periodic reports on achievement of the DRR action plan under their jurisdiction, and also address gaps and challenges of the respective scope to the Oversight Council.

The Municipal Council for DRR established by the Mayor of the municipality takes the duties and responsibilities for monitoring and implementation of the Strategy, for all activities, progress, in-vestments towards achieving of the targets and measures of the strategy, is consulted with the Inter-Ministerial Council and informs it, based on the principle of hierarchy and subordination.

The work of the Oversight Council will be led by these objectives:

1. Creation of a mechanism of cooperation and coordination for DRR at central and local level, in the private sector, civil society and international donors.

2. Support of the relevant institutions of DRR in collecting, processing and disseminating of information, as well as in the awareness raising programs, capacity building, scientific research and efficient management of knowledge.

3. Strengthening of activities that reduce vulnerability, exposure to natural and other disas-ters and the risk from generation of new threats.

4. Oversees the achieving of responsibilities, accountability and other activities of this strat-egy and strengthens the implementation of the Strategy’s Action Plan.


Composition of the Inter-ministerial Council

To ensure effective monitoring and implementation of this Strategy there is a need for Inter-min-isterial Council at a strategic/political level and the technical-professional secretariat.

The strategic-political level initially is proposed to be functionalized within the Inter-ministerial Council for Waters, which already functions within the Office of Prime Minister. This Council would ensure that the decisions deriving from this Strategy will be directly followed to the Prime Minister of the Republic of Kosovo.

- Water Council to be transformed in an Inter-ministerial Council for Waters, natural and oth-er disaster risk reduction and Climate Change.

- The Government to issue a decision on the new composition and set the duties and re-sponsibilities of the Inter-ministerial Council for Waters, natural and other disaster risk re-duction and Climate Change.

Members of the Council are proposed to be the following:

- Prime Minister;- Minister of Internal Affairs;- Minister of Local Administration and Governance;- Minister of Environment and Spatial Planning;- Ministry of Infrastructure;- Minister of Finances;- Minister of Economic Development;- Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Rural Development; - Minister of Education, Science and Technology;- Representatives of two municipalities;- Donor’s community, without a right to vote.

Secretariat of the Council

The Secretariat will be an existing permanent structure within the Council, which will be also filled with professional staff, with a member from the respective Ministries of the Inter-ministerial Coun-cil for Waters, disaster risk reduction and Climate Change.

Proposal of the DRRS working group:

The Head of the Secretariat to be appointed from a member of EMA/MIA.

The Oversight Authority to issue a decision on the composition of the Secretariat.

Duties of the Secretariat are:

- To coordinate activities of the institutions on risk reduction; -To arrange regular meetings of the Council;


- To finalize, distribute and publish the reports of the Council to the Government;- To organize conferences, seminars, trainings and workshops in the area of DRR; and- Other tasks as requested by the Oversight Council.

7.3. Evaluation of costs for implementation of the DRR Strategy

Evaluation for each activity and the measures taken for implementation of the Strategy is calcu-lated in the DRRS Action Plan. The financial resources to carry out the duties and activities that derive from this strategy will be from the budget of the Republic of Kosovo, the Fund of Emer-gency Budget and other incomes in compliance with the applicable laws of Kosovo, as well as the donations and joint projects. Within the cooperation with international partners, strong support is expected with grants and joint projects to support the implementation of DRR Strategy and the activities of the Action Plan.

The estimated cost of the Action Plan reaches the amount 468,500.01 Euro, which is calculated according to the second part of the document/AP of DRRS. The calculation is based in the costing model using the uniform price per unit and it is designed to comply with KASH, and also for inte-gration in the annual budget planning process. In this regard, AP should be looked as a means of the strategic budget.

All cost evaluations were done in Euro, according to the 2015 prices.


BIBLIOGRAPHY

■ ahmed, Mey. M, 2014, Inclusion of gender issues in the policies and strategies on adaptation towards climate change and natural disaster risk reduction.

■ caDrI, april 2011, report on risk assessment capacities in Kosovo, http://www.cadri.net/en/where-we-work/kosovo, accessed on December 11, 2015.

■ constitution of the republic of Kosovo, 2008. ■ Emergency Management agency, 2015, DesInventar Kosova. http://desinventarkosova.rks-gov.net/DesInventar/profiletab.

jsp?countrycode=rks&continue=y, accessed on December 11, 2015. ■ European Union, Program of the European Instrument for cooperation on civil Protection for accession and potential

candidate countries, http://www.ipacivilprotection.eu/index.html, accessed on December 11, 2015. ■ Law on construction No 04/L-110, Law No 2003/3 on Kosovo Forestry ■ Law on Emergency Management agency, No. 2004/ 04/L-230. ■ Law on Emergency health care No 2006/02-L-50. ■ Law on Environmental Impact assessment No 2010/03-L-214. ■ Law on Environmental Protection No. 2009/03-L-025. ■ Law on Forestry of Kosovo Nr 2003/3 ■ Law on Local Government No 2008/03-L-040. ■ Law on Ministry of Kosovo Security council No 2008/03-L045. ■ Law on Kosovo Security council, No .2008/03-L050. ■ Law on Police No 2011/04-L-076. ■ Law on Protection against Fire No .2011/04-L-012. ■ Law on Protection against Natural and Other disasters No 2011/ 04- L- 027. ■ Law on Public Financial Management No 2013/04-L-194. ■ Law on Public health No 2007/02-L-78. ■ Law on red cross of Kosovo No 2010/03-L-179. ■ Law on Spatial Planning No 2012/04-L-174. ■ Law on treatment of Illegal constructions No. 04/l-188. ■ Law on Waters, no 2004/24. ■ Orgut consulting, 2014, Kosovo country Gender Profile – an analysis of Gender Differences at all Levels. ■ OScE, June 2011, Eight years after: Minority returns and housing and property restitution in Kosovo ■ Strategy on climate change in Kosovo 2014, Ministry of Environment and Spatial Planning. ■ the Government of Kosovo, 2014, analysis of strategic security sector. ■ the Government of Kosovo, 2013, Declaration of Medium-term Policies Priority 2014-2016 ■ the Government of Kosovo, 2016, Draft Law on critical Infrastructure and its Protection ■ the Government of Kosovo, 2016, risk assessment against Natural and other Disasters. ■ the Government of Kosovo, 2010, National response Plan. ■ the Government of Kosovo, 2010, Integrated System of Emergency Management ■ the Government of Kosovo, 2013, Program of the Kosovo republic Government 2015-2018, http://www . kryeministri-ks.

net/repository/docs/programi_i_qeverise_shqip_.pdf, accessed on December 11, 2015. ■ UNDP, 2013, Initiative on Disaster risk reduction in Kosovo (KDDrI). ■ UN-haBItat Kosovo, 2009, Identification of disaster risks during spatial planning for sustainable development: case Study

Kosovo ■ UNISDr, Preventionweb, http://www.preventionweb.net/ipadrr/, accessed on December 11, 2015 ■ United Nations, 2005, hyogo Framework for action (2005-2015). ■ United Nations, 2015, Sendai Framework for action on Disaster risk reduction (2015-2030) ■ World Bank, 2005, Kosovo Poverty assessment: Promoting opportunity, security, and participation for all. report No.

32378- XK.


■ Zupka, D, 2014, Integration of risk reduction for Investments ■ Zupka, D, 2011, report on Drr capacity assessment.


ThE AIM Of ThE ACTION plAN fOR DRRSAction plan (AP) is a constituent part of multi-sectoral Disaster Risk Reduction Strategy in Kosovo (DRRS) 2016 - 2018.

AP is an operative strategic document which informs all responsible institutions, donors and other partners in the security sector, for the key priorities which the Republic of Kosovo institutions must meet in the scope of their field. Priorities presented in AP reflect the strategic directions and the ways through which relevant institutions and their staff will develop specific plans for implementing the DRRS.

AP is an operational document whose aim is detailing the strategic priorities, results and actions, through which DRRS will positively influence the Integration of Risk Reduction in policies and development plans, empowering and increasing of capacities for early warning, creating safe and stable communities against disasters and prevention of new risks in Kosovo.

AP also provides a solid basis for donors coordination and it is one of the main components of the Wide Sectorial Approach that enables central and local level to position themselves as heads of the changes in the environmental and planning sector, while the donor community enables the concentration support on the strategic priorities of sustainable development policies of the vital environment

This plan is also based on the principles and dedication from the Framework Sendai for Risk Reduction from Disasters 2015-2030 approved during the Third World Conference of the UN held in Sendai, Japan, on 18 March 2015.

In addition, AP is a tool for strategic management and policy development, as it provides risk governance, understanding and management of risk, orientations towards structural development that contribute to reforming the system of early warning, the development of new risks etc. and changes that exceed the limits of political mandates and human resources.

AP is a dynamic document, as the Government of the Republic of Kosovo will use it carefully as an instrument for monitoring the implementation of projects to reduce the risks from natural and technological disasters, and as a tool of information regarding the various natural phenomena. Therefore, it is foreseen that AP should be updated regularly in close cooperation and coordination with all competent bodies.


Actio

nIn

dica

tors

of s

ucce

ssRe

spon

sibl

e In

sti-

tutio

nSu

ppor

ting

Inst

itu-

tions

Tim

elin

e fo

r re

aliz

atio

n/im

plem

en-

tatio

n

The

finan

cial

co

st a

nd th

e so

urce

of fi

-na

ncin

g

Com

men

ts

Stra

tegi

c ob

ject

ive:

1. T

he in

tegr

atio

n of

risk

redu

ctio

n in

pol

icie

s an

d de

velo

pmen

t pla

ns a

nd th

e su

perv

isio

n

Mea

sure

/ St

rate

gic

sub-

obje

ctiv

e:1.

1. In

tegr

atio

n of

dis

aste

r ris

k re

duct

ion

polic

ies

and

impl

emen

tatio

n of

lega

l fra

mew

ork

for r

isk

man

agem

ent a

nd

gove

rnin

g.

1.1.

1.Bu

ildin

g pr

o-fe

ssio

nal c

apac

ities

in

pol

icie

s fo

r D

RR

# an

nual

trai

ning

for 3

0 pa

rtic

ipan

ts fo

r pol

icie

s an

d em

erge

ncy

man

age-

men

t#

the

capa

citie

s of

par

tic-

ipan

ts tr

aini

ng in

pol

icie

s an

d em

erge

ncy

man

age-

men

t are

bui

lt 60

% d

urin

g th

is p

erio

d

DRR

S Su

perv

isor

y Co

unci

l (SC

)IO

, NG

O,

civi

l soc

iety

and

pr

ivat

e se

ctor

2016

-202

0Ad

min

istr

ativ

e-

EMA

Trai

ning

s w

ill b

e he

ld in

EM

A- K

APS

1.1.

2. C

reat

ion

of a

re

spon

sibl

e w

ork-

ing

grou

p fo

r int

e-gr

atin

g th

e po

licie

s D

RR

# ac

tive

part

icip

atio

n of

th

e w

orki

ng g

roup

mem

-be

rs#

num

ber o

f int

egra

ted

polic

ies

for D

RR

SC o

f DRR

S Ko

sovo

Gov

ern-

men

t20

16-2

017

Adm

inis

trat

ive

The

grou

p is

cre

ated

ba

sed

on D

RRS

1.1.

3. Im

plem

enta

-tio

n of

Ris

k A

sses

s-m

ent b

y N

OD

# ap

prov

al o

f the

risk

as-

sess

men

t doc

umen

t fro

m

resp

ectiv

e s

truc

ture

s by

N

OD

# p

erio

dic

mee

tings

be

twee

n re

leva

nt re

pre-

sent

ativ

es to

mon

itor t

he

impl

emen

tatio

n pr

ogre

ss

of R

isk

Ass

essm

ent d

ocu-

men

t

Koso

vo G

over

n-m

ent,

Min

istr

y of

In

tern

al A

ffairs

,A

ll th

e in

stitu

tions

of

the

Repu

blic

of

Koso

vo, I

Os,

NG

Os,

civi

l soc

iety

and

pr

ivat

e se

ctor

2016

-201

8

40 DISASTER RISK REDUCTION STRATEGY AND PLAN OF ACTION 2016 - 20201.

1.4.

Impl

emen

ta-

tion

of th

e Re

gula

-tio

n on

Ass

essm

ent

Met

hodo

logy

of

Dam

ages

from

Dis

-as

ters

#App

rova

l of t

he re

gula

-tio

n by

the

Koso

vo G

ov-

ernm

ent

# tr

aini

ngs

for t

he a

ppli-

catio

n of

regu

latio

n in

to

prac

tice

Stat

e in

stitu

tions

, pu

blic

and

priv

ate

sect

orIO

2016

-202

0Ad

min

istr

ativ

eEM

A- K

APS

Mea

sure

/ St

rate

gic

sub-

obje

ctiv

e: 1

.2. S

tren

gthe

ning

of i

nstit

utio

nal m

echa

nism

s an

d ca

paci

ties

of re

spon

sibl

e in

stitu

tions

at t

he c

entr

al a

nd lo

cal

leve

l for

impl

emen

tatio

n of

the

stra

tegy

.

1.2.

1. Id

entifi

catio

n of

inst

itutio

nal

mec

hani

sms

that

ne

ed im

prov

emen

t.

# re

port

to d

evel

op in

sti-

tutio

nal m

echa

nism

sSC

of D

RRIO

2016

-202

0Ad

min

istr

ativ

e

1.2.

2. D

eter

min

a-tio

n of

the

role

s an

d re

spon

sibi

litie

s of

m

ain

stak

ehol

ders

# 6

mon

th ro

undt

able

s w

ith th

e m

ain

stak

ehol

d-er

s

# th

e co

mpi

latio

n of

a

man

ual f

or th

e ro

les

and

resp

onsi

bilit

ies

SC o

f DRR

Line

Min

istr

ies

and

Mun

icip

aliti

es

2016

-202

0Ad

min

istr

ativ

e D

RRS

Ann

ex

1.2.

3. D

evel

opin

g th

e ca

paci

ty o

f em

erge

ncy

serv

ices

in

Kos

ovo

# an

nual

trai

ning

for

emer

genc

y se

rvic

es in

Ko

sovo

# te

chni

cal a

ssis

tanc

e

SC o

f DRR

SAc

adem

y of

Sc

ienc

es a

nd A

rts

of K

osov

o (A

SAK)

2016

-202

015

,000

for t

hree

ye

ars

1.2.

4. Id

entifi

catio

n an

d as

sess

men

t of

need

s fo

r hum

an

reso

urce

s an

d de

-ve

lopm

ent o

f edu

-ca

tiona

l pla

n

# th

e nu

mbe

r of p

artic

-ip

ants

in th

e pr

oces

s of

id

entif

ying

and

ass

essi

ng#

Educ

atio

nal P

lan

for

NO

D

SC o

f DRR

S

MES

T, M

inis

try

of

Fina

nce,

UN

ICEF

an

d Ko

sovo

Red

Cr

oss

(KRC

)

Perm

anen

tAd

min

istr

ativ

e +

Don

ors’

assi

s-ta

nce

1.2.

5. C

ontin

uous

im

prov

emen

t of t

he

prof

essi

onal

dev

el-

opm

ent s

yste

m

# G

reat

er in

volv

emen

t of

the

inst

itutio

ns in

the

syst

em#

Incr

easi

ng o

f sup

port

-in

g sy

stem

leve

l by

bene

-fic

iarie

s

SC o

f DRR

S

All

the

inst

itutio

ns

of th

e Re

publ

ic o

f Ko

sovo

, IO

s, N

GO

s, ci

vil s

ocie

ty a

nd

priv

ate

sect

or

Perm

anen

t

Mea

sure

/ St

rate

gic

sub-

obje

ctiv

e:1.

3. L

obby

ing

for p

oliti

cal e

ngag

emen

t and

taki

ng o

f res

pons

ibili

ties

and

acco

unta

bilit

y.

1.3.

1. O

rient

atio

n an

d de

stin

atio

n of

do

natio

ns fo

r DRR

S

# D

onor

s’ pa

rtic

ipat

ion

for

DRR

S#

Perio

dic

repo

rts

from

th

e SC

sec

reta

riat

SC o

f DRR

S

Gov

ernm

ent s

ub-

sidi

es, s

pons

ors’

dona

tions

, oth

er

Inte

rnat

iona

l & L

o-ca

l NG

Os

2016

-202

0 A

dmin

istr

ativ

e

1.3.

2. O

rgan

izin

g a

dono

rs’ c

onfe

renc

e fo

r DRR

S

# H

igh

part

icip

atio

n of

th

e m

ain

inst

itutio

ns a

t th

e co

nfer

ence

# A

naly

sis

of n

eeds

for d

o-na

tions

rega

rdin

g D

RRS

SC o

f DRR

S

Spon

sors

’ don

a-tio

ns, N

GO

s an

d ot

her i

nter

natio

nal

& lo

cal

2016

-202

0Ad

min

istr

ativ

e

1.3.

3 Es

tabl

ishm

ent

of a

mec

hani

sm fo

r m

onito

ring

and

im-

plem

entin

g pr

ojec

ts

of d

onor

fund

s

# Id

entifi

ed d

efici

enci

es

in th

e pr

oced

ures

and

m

echa

nism

s fo

r mon

itor-

ing

# pr

ogre

ss a

naly

sis

in

inte

rnat

iona

l pro

ject

s ac

hiev

ing

SC o

f DRR

S

Inte

rnal

and

Ext

er-

nal A

udito

r M

inis

-tr

y of

Fin

ance

and

ci

vil s

ocie

ty

2016

-202

0

1.3.

4. R

aisi

ng th

e fu

nds

thro

ugh

tax-

es fo

r DRR

for t

he

need

s in

the

coun

-tr

y an

d re

gion

# id

entifi

catio

n of

nee

ds

for c

ontr

ibut

ions

# d

raft

ing

of a

pro

ject

bu

dget

SC o

f DRR

S

The

Min

istry

of

Fina

nce

(Insu

ranc

e Co

mpa

nies

), W

orld

Ba

nk, a

nd E

urop

ean

Bank

for R

econ

-st

ruct

ion

and

De-

velo

pmen

t

2016

-202

0


1.1.

4. Im

plem

enta

-tio

n of

the

Regu

la-

tion

on A

sses

smen

t M

etho

dolo

gy o

f D

amag

es fr

om D

is-

aste

rs

#App

rova

l of t

he re

gula

-tio

n by

the

Koso

vo G

ov-

ernm

ent

# tr

aini

ngs

for t

he a

ppli-

catio

n of

regu

latio

n in

to

prac

tice

Stat

e in

stitu

tions

, pu

blic

and

priv

ate

sect

orIO

2016

-202

0Ad

min

istr

ativ

eEM

A- K

APS

Mea

sure

/ St

rate

gic

sub-

obje

ctiv

e: 1

.2. S

tren

gthe

ning

of i

nstit

utio

nal m

echa

nism

s an

d ca

paci

ties

of re

spon

sibl

e in

stitu

tions

at t

he c

entr

al a

nd lo

cal

leve

l for

impl

emen

tatio

n of

the

stra

tegy

.

1.2.

1. Id

entifi

catio

n of

inst

itutio

nal

mec

hani

sms

that

ne

ed im

prov

emen

t.

# re

port

to d

evel

op in

sti-

tutio

nal m

echa

nism

sSC

of D

RRIO

2016

-202

0Ad

min

istr

ativ

e

1.2.

2. D

eter

min

a-tio

n of

the

role

s an

d re

spon

sibi

litie

s of

m

ain

stak

ehol

ders

# 6

mon

th ro

undt

able

s w

ith th

e m

ain

stak

ehol

d-er

s

# th

e co

mpi

latio

n of

a

man

ual f

or th

e ro

les

and

resp

onsi

bilit

ies

SC o

f DRR

Line

Min

istr

ies

and

Mun

icip

aliti

es

2016

-202

0Ad

min

istr

ativ

e D

RRS

Ann

ex

1.2.

3. D

evel

opin

g th

e ca

paci

ty o

f em

erge

ncy

serv

ices

in

Kos

ovo

# an

nual

trai

ning

for

emer

genc

y se

rvic

es in

Ko

sovo

# te

chni

cal a

ssis

tanc

e

SC o

f DRR

SAc

adem

y of

Sc

ienc

es a

nd A

rts

of K

osov

o (A

SAK)

2016

-202

015

,000

for t

hree

ye

ars

1.2.

4. Id

entifi

catio

n an

d as

sess

men

t of

need

s fo

r hum

an

reso

urce

s an

d de

-ve

lopm

ent o

f edu

-ca

tiona

l pla

n

# th

e nu

mbe

r of p

artic

-ip

ants

in th

e pr

oces

s of

id

entif

ying

and

ass

essi

ng#

Educ

atio

nal P

lan

for

NO

D

SC o

f DRR

S

MES

T, M

inis

try

of

Fina

nce,

UN

ICEF

an

d Ko

sovo

Red

Cr

oss

(KRC

)

Perm

anen

tAd

min

istr

ativ

e +

Don

ors’

assi

s-ta

nce

1.2.

5. C

ontin

uous

im

prov

emen

t of t

he

prof

essi

onal

dev

el-

opm

ent s

yste

m

# G

reat

er in

volv

emen

t of

the

inst

itutio

ns in

the

syst

em#

Incr

easi

ng o

f sup

port

-in

g sy

stem

leve

l by

bene

-fic

iarie

s

SC o

f DRR

S

All

the

inst

itutio

ns

of th

e Re

publ

ic o

f Ko

sovo

, IO

s, N

GO

s, ci

vil s

ocie

ty a

nd

priv

ate

sect

or

Perm

anen

t

Mea

sure

/ St

rate

gic

sub-

obje

ctiv

e:1.

3. L

obby

ing

for p

oliti

cal e

ngag

emen

t and

taki

ng o

f res

pons

ibili

ties

and

acco

unta

bilit

y.

1.3.

1. O

rient

atio

n an

d de

stin

atio

n of

do

natio

ns fo

r DRR

S

# D

onor

s’ pa

rtic

ipat

ion

for

DRR

S#

Perio

dic

repo

rts

from

th

e SC

sec

reta

riat

SC o

f DRR

S

Gov

ernm

ent s

ub-

sidi

es, s

pons

ors’

dona

tions

, oth

er

Inte

rnat

iona

l & L

o-ca

l NG

Os

2016

-202

0 A

dmin

istr

ativ

e

1.3.

2. O

rgan

izin

g a

dono

rs’ c

onfe

renc

e fo

r DRR

S

# H

igh

part

icip

atio

n of

th

e m

ain

inst

itutio

ns a

t th

e co

nfer

ence

# A

naly

sis

of n

eeds

for d

o-na

tions

rega

rdin

g D

RRS

SC o

f DRR

S

Spon

sors

’ don

a-tio

ns, N

GO

s an

d ot

her i

nter

natio

nal

& lo

cal

2016

-202

0Ad

min

istr

ativ

e

1.3.

3 Es

tabl

ishm

ent

of a

mec

hani

sm fo

r m

onito

ring

and

im-

plem

entin

g pr

ojec

ts

of d

onor

fund

s

# Id

entifi

ed d

efici

enci

es

in th

e pr

oced

ures

and

m

echa

nism

s fo

r mon

itor-

ing

# pr

ogre

ss a

naly

sis

in

inte

rnat

iona

l pro

ject

s ac

hiev

ing

SC o

f DRR

S

Inte

rnal

and

Ext

er-

nal A

udito

r M

inis

-tr

y of

Fin

ance

and

ci

vil s

ocie

ty

2016

-202

0

1.3.

4. R

aisi

ng th

e fu

nds

thro

ugh

tax-

es fo

r DRR

for t

he

need

s in

the

coun

-tr

y an

d re

gion

# id

entifi

catio

n of

nee

ds

for c

ontr

ibut

ions

# d

raft

ing

of a

pro

ject

bu

dget

SC o

f DRR

S

The

Min

istry

of

Fina

nce

(Insu

ranc

e Co

mpa

nies

), W

orld

Ba

nk, a

nd E

urop

ean

Bank

for R

econ

-st

ruct

ion

and

De-

velo

pmen

t

2016

-202

0

42 DISASTER RISK REDUCTION STRATEGY AND PLAN OF ACTION 2016 - 2020M

easu

re /

Stra

tegi

c su

b-ob

ject

ive:

1.4.

Incr

ease

of fi

nanc

ial s

uppo

rt fo

r dis

aste

r ris

k re

duct

ion.

1.4.

1 Lo

bbyi

ng fo

r fin

anci

al s

uppo

rt

from

ext

erna

l and

in

tern

al d

onor

s an

d th

e in

tere

sted

pa

rtie

s

# pe

riodi

c m

eetin

gs w

ith

dono

rs#

annu

al C

onfe

renc

es a

t th

e ce

ntra

l lev

el

SC o

f DRR

S

Min

istr

y of

For

eign

A

ffairs

, Min

istr

y of

Eur

opea

n In

-te

grat

ion,

UN

DP,

UN

ICEF

, UN

HCR

, U

S Em

bass

y, U

SAID

an

d IP

A P

rogr

am

2016

-202

090

00 fo

r thr

ee

year

s

Mea

sure

/ St

rate

gic

sub-

obje

ctiv

e:1.

5. C

ompl

ianc

e of

sec

tor l

aws/

polic

ies

with

the

risk

asse

ssm

ent a

nd m

anag

emen

t sta

ndar

ds.

1.5.

1 Id

entifi

catio

n of

are

as fo

r har

mo-

niza

tion

Dra

ftin

g of

new

law

s, su

pple

men

t am

endi

ng

proc

edur

es o

f ap

plic

able

la

ws

and

subl

egal

act

s

SC o

f DRR

SM

inis

try

of Ju

stic

e,

Rele

vant

Min

istr

ies

and

IOs

2016

-202

0Ad

min

istr

ativ

e

1.5.

2.

Har

mon

iza-

tion

of s

ecto

ral l

aws

with

DRR

’s cy

cle

# an

alys

is o

f law

s th

at

need

har

mon

izat

ion

# nu

mbe

r of h

arm

oniz

ed

law

sSC

of D

RRS

Rele

vant

min

istr

ies

and

cons

ulta

ncy

supp

ort f

rom

inte

r-na

tiona

l org

aniz

a-tio

ns

2016

-202

0Su

ppor

t fro

m

dono

rs

1.5.

3. S

uper

visi

on

of la

ws’

harm

oniz

a-tio

n

# 6

mon

ths

repo

rts

# re

com

men

datio

ns fo

r fu

rthe

r har

mon

izat

ion

SC o

f DRR

SRe

leva

nt m

inis

-tr

ies,

civi

l soc

iety

an

d IO

2016

-202

0Su

ppor

t fro

m

dono

rs

1.6.

Mea

sure

/ St

rate

gic

sub-

obje

ctiv

e:1.

6. E

stab

lishm

ent o

f an

over

sigh

t bod

y fo

r im

plem

enta

tion

of D

isas

ter R

isk

Redu

ctio

n St

rate

gy.

1.6.

1. E

stab

lish-

men

t of t

he S

uper

-vi

sory

Cou

ncil

for

DRR

S

# de

cisi

on b

y th

e go

vern

-m

ent f

or th

e es

tabl

ish-

men

t of S

C D

RRS

# pe

riodi

c m

eetin

gs o

f SC

DRR

S

Prim

e M

inis

ter o

f th

e Re

publ

ic o

f Ko

sovo

/ M

inis

ter

of M

IA

SC o

f DRR

S20

16-2

020

1.6.

2. R

egul

ar

mon

itorin

g an

d re

port

ing

on th

e im

plem

enta

tion

of

AP-

DRR

S

# 6

mon

ths

repo

rts

# Re

com

men

datio

ns fo

r fu

rthe

r wor

kSC

of D

RRS

Civi

l soc

iety

2016

-202

0

43DISASTER RISK REDUCTION STRATEGY AND PLAN OF ACTION 2016 - 2020St

rate

gic

obje

ctiv

e: 2

. Dev

elop

ing

the

capa

citi

es fo

r ris

k m

anag

emen

t N

OD

Mea

sure

/ St

rate

gic

sub-

obje

ctiv

e 2.

1: In

crea

se o

f ski

lls fo

r gen

erat

ion

of in

form

atio

n (s

tatis

tics

and

diffe

rent

dat

a) o

n na

tura

l and

oth

er d

isas

ters

.

2.1.

1. D

evel

opin

g Ca

paci

ties

of H

IK,

SIK,

ARR

K le

vel s

e-cu

rity

coor

dina

tion

and

coop

erat

ion

with

oth

er in

stitu

-tio

ns in

Kos

ovo

as

wel

l as

part

icip

atio

n in

inte

rnat

iona

l pro

-je

cts.

# in

sura

nce

expe

rts

who

as

sist

the

office

rs o

f the

in

stitu

tions

at t

he w

ork-

plac

e#

equi

pmen

t with

tech

ni-

cal a

ssis

tanc

e

SC o

f DRR

SKA

SA, I

Os,

NG

Os,

civi

l soc

iety

and

pr

ivat

e se

ctor

2016

-202

0 10

,000

/ yea

r (

3000

0)

2.1.

2. A

ppro

val

of n

ew te

chni

cal

solu

tions

for p

ro-

tect

ion

agai

nst

flood

s, er

osio

n an

d flo

od c

ontr

ol, t

he

resi

denc

es a

nd th

e co

nstr

uctio

n of

new

fa

cilit

ies.

# re

port

s id

entif

ying

new

m

etho

ds#

cons

ulta

tive

mee

tings

w

ith re

leva

nt s

take

hold

-er

s

SC o

f DRR

SM

ESP,

MA

FRD

, Lo-

cal G

over

nmen

t, IO

an

d N

GO

2016

-202

030

0,00

0 / t

hree

ye

ars

This

fund

is p

rovi

d-ed

by

MES

P pe

riodi

-ca

lly, f

or m

unic

ipal

i-tie

s in

nee

d

2.1.

3. M

oder

niza

-tio

n an

d au

tom

a-tio

n of

exi

stin

g st

atio

ns a

nd th

e es

-ta

blis

hmen

t of n

ew

auto

mat

ic m

eteo

r-ol

ogic

al a

nd h

ydro

-lo

gica

l sta

tions

# st

anda

rds

for t

he m

od-

erni

zatio

n an

d au

tom

a-tio

n of

sta

tions

# th

e nu

mbe

r of n

ew s

ta-

tions

SC o

f DRR

SM

ESP,

MA

FRD

IO

and

NG

O20

16-2

020

Don

atio

ns fr

om

IO


1.4.

Cap

aciti

es

form

atio

n to

mon

-ito

r, an

alys

e an

d ta

ke m

easu

res

agai

nst l

ands

lides

, aff

ores

tatio

n, a

nd

aval

anch

es.

# th

e nu

mbe

r of p

artic

i-pa

nts

in tr

aini

ng#

50%

incr

ease

of p

ar-

ticip

ants

’ kno

wle

dge

in

term

s of

taki

ng m

easu

res

agai

nst t

he la

ndsl

ides

, aff

ores

tatio

n an

d av

a-la

nche

s

SC o

f DRR

SM

ESP,

MA

FRD

, IO

an

d N

GO

2016

-202

0Ad

min

istr

ativ

e

MA

FRD

has

as-

sign

ed th

is b

udge

t of

1 m

illio

n eu

ros

for t

he p

rote

ctio

n of

fore

sts

from

fire

s, aff

ores

tatio

n of

bar

e ar

eas

and

fore

st s

il-vi

cultu

ral t

reat

men

t

2.1.

5. Im

plem

enta

-tio

n of

met

hodo

lo-

gies

to a

dvan

ce a

nd

com

plet

e fu

nctio

n-in

g of

the

Net

wor

k Se

ism

ic K

osov

o en

richi

ng ti

me

stat

ions

sei

smol

og-

ical

(sei

smog

raph

, ac

cele

rogr

aph

and

GPS

), pr

ogra

ms

on

seis

mic

risk

(sei

smic

ha

zard

and

sei

s-m

ic ri

sk) a

nd th

e m

ost s

ophi

stic

at-

ed e

quip

men

t for

re

cord

ing

stro

ng

vibr

atio

ns

Trai

ning

on

Seis

mic

pro

-gr

ams

(Sei

smic

Net

wor

k Se

rver

s), a

pac

ket o

f ap-

plic

atio

ns th

at w

ork

in

real

tim

e to

det

ect a

nd

loca

lize

eart

hqua

kes

au-

tom

atic

ally

and

at r

eal

time

as w

ell a

s se

ism

ic

prog

ram

s fo

r sei

smic

S

risk

asse

ssm

ent f

or th

e ris

k re

duct

ion

from

nat

u-ra

l dis

aste

rs w

ith s

eism

ic

solu

tions

and

con

tem

po-

rary

met

hods

of g

eoph

ys-

ical

stu

dies

SC o

f DRR

SM

ED, I

O a

nd N

GO

2016

-202

011

0,00

0En

richm

ent w

ith

equi

pmen

t, pr

o-gr

ams

in ti

me


2.1.

4. C

apac

ities

fo

rmat

ion

to m

on-

itor,

anal

yse

and

take

mea

sure

s ag

ains

t lan

dslid

es,

affor

esta

tion,

and

av

alan

ches

.

# th

e nu

mbe

r of p

artic

i-pa

nts

in tr

aini

ng#

50%

incr

ease

of p

ar-

ticip

ants

’ kno

wle

dge

in

term

s of

taki

ng m

easu

res

agai

nst t

he la

ndsl

ides

, aff

ores

tatio

n an

d av

a-la

nche

s

SC o

f DRR

SM

ESP,

MA

FRD

, IO

an

d N

GO

2016

-202

0Ad

min

istr

ativ

e

MA

FRD

has

as-

sign

ed th

is b

udge

t of

1 m

illio

n eu

ros

for t

he p

rote

ctio

n of

fore

sts

from

fire

s, aff

ores

tatio

n of

bar

e ar

eas

and

fore

st s

il-vi

cultu

ral t

reat

men

t

2.1.

5. Im

plem

enta

-tio

n of

met

hodo

lo-

gies

to a

dvan

ce a

nd

com

plet

e fu

nctio

n-in

g of

the

Net

wor

k Se

ism

ic K

osov

o en

richi

ng ti

me

stat

ions

sei

smol

og-

ical

(sei

smog

raph

, ac

cele

rogr

aph

and

GPS

), pr

ogra

ms

on

seis

mic

risk

(sei

smic

ha

zard

and

sei

s-m

ic ri

sk) a

nd th

e m

ost s

ophi

stic

at-

ed e

quip

men

t for

re

cord

ing

stro

ng

vibr

atio

ns

Trai

ning

on

Seis

mic

pro

-gr

ams

(Sei

smic

Net

wor

k Se

rver

s), a

pac

ket o

f ap-

plic

atio

ns th

at w

ork

in

real

tim

e to

det

ect a

nd

loca

lize

eart

hqua

kes

au-

tom

atic

ally

and

at r

eal

time

as w

ell a

s se

ism

ic

prog

ram

s fo

r sei

smic

S

risk

asse

ssm

ent f

or th

e ris

k re

duct

ion

from

nat

u-ra

l dis

aste

rs w

ith s

eism

ic

solu

tions

and

con

tem

po-

rary

met

hods

of g

eoph

ys-

ical

stu

dies

SC o

f DRR

SM

ED, I

O a

nd N

GO

2016

-202

011

0,00

0En

richm

ent w

ith

equi

pmen

t, pr

o-gr

ams

in ti

me

2.1.

6. R

enew

al o

f ris

k se

ism

ic m

aps

and

dist

ribut

ion

of

the

max

imum

sei

s-m

ic in

tens

ity (r

e-se

arch

and

iden

tifi-

catio

n of

are

as w

ith

the

high

est s

eism

ic

activ

ity) f

or th

e te

rrito

ry o

f Kos

ovo

with

the

fres

h da

ta

from

Sei

smic

Net

-w

ork

and

regi

onal

se

ism

olog

ical

inst

i-tu

tes.

# re

new

ed m

aps

of s

eis-

mic

risk

# %

e o

f the

map

s ex

tent

on

the

terr

itory

of K

osov

o

SC o

f DRR

SM

ED, I

O a

nd N

GO

2016

-202

0Ad

min

istr

ativ

e

Mea

sure

/ St

rate

gic

sub-

obje

ctiv

e 2.

2: S

tren

gthe

ning

of c

apac

ities

for c

olle

ctio

n, a

sses

smen

t and

ana

lysi

ng o

f inf

orm

atio

n, a

s w

ell a

s co

ntin

uous

up-

date

of t

he d

atab

ase

on n

atur

al d

isas

ters

, Des

-Inve

ntar

.

2.2.

1. E

stab

lishi

ng

proc

edur

es fo

r reg

-ul

ar e

xcha

nge

of

met

eoro

logi

cal,

hy-

drol

ogic

al, s

eism

ic,

radi

atio

n in

form

a-tio

n, e

tc. b

etw

een

the

com

pete

nt s

er-

vice

s in

Kos

ovo

and

neig

hbou

ring

coun

-tr

ies,

as w

ell a

s w

ith

othe

r int

erna

tiona

l in

stitu

tions

(ICP

DR,

W

MO

, etc

.)

# dr

aftin

g of

agr

eem

ents

# th

e nu

mbe

r of n

ew im

-pl

emen

ted

proc

edur

es

SC o

f DRR

SM

ESP,

MA

FRD

, IO

an

d N

GO

2016

-202

0Ad

min

istr

ativ

e


2.2.

Con

tinuo

us

trai

ning

of n

ew

met

hods

for d

ata

colle

ctio

n fr

om

disa

ster

s (in

clud

ing

Des

Inve

ntar

)

# H

igh

part

icip

atio

n in

th

e tr

aini

ng o

f rel

evan

t in

stitu

tions

# ex

perie

nce

exch

ange

w

ith s

imila

r ins

titut

ions

in

the

regi

on

SC o

f DRR

SM

IA, E

MA

and

IO

2016

-202

0Ad

min

istr

ativ

e +

Fore

ign

dona

-tio

ns

2.2.

3.

Supp

ortin

g th

e ro

undt

able

s fo

r sh

arin

g th

e ex

pe-

rienc

es o

n D

esIn

-ve

ntar

# a

high

par

ticip

atio

n of

re

leva

nt in

stitu

tions

# nu

mbe

r of r

ecom

men

-da

tions

from

roun

dtab

les

SC o

f DRR

SM

IA, E

MA

and

IO20

16-2

020

Fore

ign

dona

-tio

ns

Mea

sure

/ St

rate

gic

sub-

obje

ctiv

e: 2

.3. E

xpan

sion

of n

ew c

apac

ities

of t

he in

stitu

tions

at c

entr

al a

nd lo

cal l

evel

for e

arly

ale

rt s

yste

miz

ing.

2.3.

1. S

tudy

on

ef-

fect

ive

syst

ems

of

an e

arly

war

ning

an

d re

com

men

da-

tions

for K

osov

o

# re

com

men

datio

ns is

-su

ed fr

om th

e st

udy

# th

e nu

mbe

r of s

take

-ho

lder

s th

at a

cces

s th

e st

udy

SC o

f DRR

SM

IA, E

MA

and

IO20

16-2

020

Fore

ign

dona

-tio

ns

2.3.

2. S

uppo

rtin

g th

e tr

aini

ng fo

r rel

-ev

ant i

nstit

utio

ns

at lo

cal a

nd c

entr

al

leve

l for

an

early

w

arni

ng

# Th

e hi

gh p

artic

ipat

ion

of re

leva

nt in

stitu

tions

# th

e nu

mbe

r of c

oope

ra-

tion

betw

een

inst

itutio

nsSC

of D

RRS

MIA

, EM

A a

nd IO

2016

-202

0Ad

min

istr

ativ

eEM

A -

KAPS

Mea

sure

/ St

rate

gic

sub-

obje

ctiv

e: 2

.4. I

ncre

ase

of in

ter-i

nstit

utio

nal c

oope

ratio

n an

d co

ordi

natio

n on

ear

ly a

lert

rela

ted

to n

atur

al d

isast

er ri

sk re

duct

ion.

2.4.

1. D

efini

ng th

e ro

le a

nd re

spon

si-

bilit

ies

thro

ugh

a re

gula

tion

for a

n ea

rly w

arni

ng s

ys-

tem

# th

e nu

mbe

r of s

take

-ho

lder

s pa

rtic

ipat

ing

in

the

draf

ting

of th

e re

gu-

latio

n#

perio

dic

prog

ress

re-

port

s

SC o

f DRR

SM

IA, E

MA

, IO

and

lo

cal g

over

nmen

t20

16-2

020

Adm

inis

trat

ive

47DISASTER RISK REDUCTION STRATEGY AND PLAN OF ACTION 2016 - 2020M

easu

re /

Stra

tegi

c su

b-ob

ject

ive:

2.5

. S

uppo

rt o

f res

earc

hes,

exch

ange

of i

nfor

mat

ion

and

coop

erat

ion

with

sci

entifi

c an

d ac

adem

ic in

stitu

tions

ai

min

g to

redu

ce th

e ex

istin

g ris

ks a

nd p

reve

nt th

e ne

w ri

sks.

2.5.

1. S

ynch

roni

za-

tion

of p

rote

ctin

g sy

stem

with

the

EU

Dire

ctiv

es o

n th

e as

sess

men

t and

m

anag

emen

t of r

isks

from

floo

ds, e

arth

-qu

akes

and

fire

s, et

c.

# id

entif

ying

the

need

for

sync

hron

izat

ion

# nu

mbe

r of h

arm

oniz

ed

field

s

SC o

f DRR

SM

IA, l

ocal

gov

ern-

men

t and

IO20

16-2

020

Adm

inis

trat

ive

2.5.

2. T

he d

evel

op-

men

t of r

isk

map

s fr

om fl

ood,

ear

th-

quak

es, fi

res

etc.

the

who

le te

rrito

ry o

f Ko

sovo

# nu

mbe

r of c

ondu

cted

ris

k m

aps

# %

of e

ndan

gere

d m

u-ni

cipa

litie

s th

at re

flect

m

aps

in th

eir p

lans

SC o

f DRR

SM

ESP,

MA

FRD

, IO

an

d N

GO

2016

-202

0D

onat

ions

Som

e pr

ojec

t pro

-po

sals

are

dra

fted

by

MES

P, M

AFR

D

and

othe

rs a

re to

be

cond

ucte

d.

2.5.

3. O

rgan

izat

ion

of c

omm

on s

emi-

nars

bet

wee

n ac

a-de

mic

and

sci

entifi

c in

stitu

tions

and

rel-

evan

t ins

titut

ions

# nu

mbe

r of s

emin

ars

or-

gani

zed

SC o

f DRR

SM

ESP,

MA

FRD

, IO

, N

GO

and

KA

SA

2016

-202

0Ad

min

istr

ativ

e

Mea

sure

/ St

rate

gic

sub-

obje

ctiv

e: 2

.6. U

nder

stan

ding

dis

aste

r ris

k an

d its

dim

ensi

ons.

2.6.

1. It

enc

oura

ges

the

use

and

enfo

rc-

ing

the

basic

and

pe

riodi

c as

sess

men

t of

risk

from

disa

ster

s, vu

lner

abili

ty, c

apac

-ity

, exp

osur

e, ri

sk

char

acte

ristic

s and

th

eir p

oten

tial e

f-fe

cts o

n th

e re

leva

nt

soci

al a

nd sp

atia

l sc

ale

in e

cosy

stem

s

# dr

aftin

g th

e sp

ecia

l fo

rm

# th

e nu

mbe

r of c

ases

w

hen

is th

e as

sess

men

t us

ed

SC o

f DRR

SA

ll st

ate

inst

itu-

tions

, IO

and

civ

il so

ciet

y s.

2016

-202

0Ad

min

istr

ativ

e


6.2.

Pro

mot

ion

of re

al-t

ime

acce

ss

to re

liabl

e da

ta,

usin

g in

form

atio

n on

are

as a

nd o

n th

e fie

ld, i

nclu

ding

ge-

ogra

phic

al in

form

a-tio

n sy

stem

s (G

IS)

# th

e cr

eatio

n of

a fu

nc-

tiona

l GIS

sys

tem

# th

e nu

mbe

r of s

take

-ho

lder

s w

ho a

cces

s th

e sy

stem

SC o

f DRR

SA

ll st

ate

inst

itu-

tions

, IO

, NG

O a

nd

civi

l soc

iety

.20

16-2

020

Don

atio

ns

Stra

tegi

c ob

ject

ive:

3.

Cre

atin

g sa

fe a

nd s

tabl

e co

mm

uniti

es fo

rm d

isas

ters

Mea

sure

/ St

rate

gic

sub-

obje

ctiv

e: 3

.1. I

mpr

ovem

ent o

f com

mun

icat

ion

and

diss

emin

atio

n of

info

rmat

ion

betw

een

the

rele

vant

inst

itutio

ns a

bout

na

tura

l dis

aste

r ris

k re

duct

ion.

3.1

.1. D

efini

ng a

Co

mm

unic

atio

n Pl

an fo

r the

rele

vant

st

ruct

ures

for D

RRS

# dr

afte

d co

mm

unic

atio

n pl

an

# %

of s

truc

ture

s th

at im

-pl

emen

t the

pla

n

SC D

RRS

All

stat

e in

stitu

-tio

ns, I

O, N

GO

and

ci

vil s

ocie

ty.

2016

-202

0Ad

min

istr

ativ

e

3.1.

2. P

ilotin

g in

so

me

mun

icip

aliti

es

and

the

exte

nt o

f Co

mm

unic

atio

n Pl

an a

t the

cou

ntry

le

vel

# re

com

men

datio

ns fr

om

the

pilo

t mun

icip

aliti

es#

the

num

ber o

f ins

tanc

es

of u

sing

the

plan

SC D

RRS

EMA

, loc

al g

over

n-m

ent,

IO, N

GO

and

ci

vil s

ocie

ty.

2016

-202

045

00 fo

r thr

ee

year

s

Mea

sure

/ St

rate

gic

sub-

obje

ctiv

e: 3

.2. I

nclu

sion

of k

now

ledg

e on

dis

aste

r ris

k re

duct

ion

to th

e ed

ucat

ion

curr

icul

a.

3.2.

1. T

he c

ompi

-la

tion

and

impl

e-m

enta

tion

of p

ro-

fess

iona

l edu

catio

n an

d tr

aini

ng in

te

chni

que

for e

mer

-ge

ncie

s by

NO

D

# N

umbe

r of c

ondu

cted

tr

aini

ngs

# th

e nu

mbe

r of p

artic

i-pa

nts

in tr

aini

ng

SC o

f DRR

S

EMA

, MES

T, S

ave

the

Child

ren,

U

NIC

EF, U

ND

P an

d IP

A e

tc.

2016

-202

0Ad

min

istr

ativ

e


2.6.

2. P

rom

otio

n of

real

-tim

e ac

cess

to

relia

ble

data

, us

ing

info

rmat

ion

on a

reas

and

on

the

field

, inc

ludi

ng g

e-og

raph

ical

info

rma-

tion

syst

ems

(GIS

)

# th

e cr

eatio

n of

a fu

nc-

tiona

l GIS

sys

tem

# th

e nu

mbe

r of s

take

-ho

lder

s w

ho a

cces

s th

e sy

stem

SC o

f DRR

SA

ll st

ate

inst

itu-

tions

, IO

, NG

O a

nd

civi

l soc

iety

.20

16-2

020

Don

atio

ns

Stra

tegi

c ob

ject

ive:

3.

Cre

atin

g sa

fe a

nd s

tabl

e co

mm

uniti

es fo

rm d

isas

ters

Mea

sure

/ St

rate

gic

sub-

obje

ctiv

e: 3

.1. I

mpr

ovem

ent o

f com

mun

icat

ion

and

diss

emin

atio

n of

info

rmat

ion

betw

een

the

rele

vant

inst

itutio

ns a

bout

na

tura

l dis

aste

r ris

k re

duct

ion.

3.1

.1. D

efini

ng a

Co

mm

unic

atio

n Pl

an fo

r the

rele

vant

st

ruct

ures

for D

RRS

# dr

afte

d co

mm

unic

atio

n pl

an

# %

of s

truc

ture

s th

at im

-pl

emen

t the

pla

n

SC D

RRS

All

stat

e in

stitu

-tio

ns, I

O, N

GO

and

ci

vil s

ocie

ty.

2016

-202

0Ad

min

istr

ativ

e

3.1.

2. P

ilotin

g in

so

me

mun

icip

aliti

es

and

the

exte

nt o

f Co

mm

unic

atio

n Pl

an a

t the

cou

ntry

le

vel

# re

com

men

datio

ns fr

om

the

pilo

t mun

icip

aliti

es#

the

num

ber o

f ins

tanc

es

of u

sing

the

plan

SC D

RRS

EMA

, loc

al g

over

n-m

ent,

IO, N

GO

and

ci

vil s

ocie

ty.

2016

-202

045

00 fo

r thr

ee

year

s

Mea

sure

/ St

rate

gic

sub-

obje

ctiv

e: 3

.2. I

nclu

sion

of k

now

ledg

e on

dis

aste

r ris

k re

duct

ion

to th

e ed

ucat

ion

curr

icul

a.

3.2.

1. T

he c

ompi

-la

tion

and

impl

e-m

enta

tion

of p

ro-

fess

iona

l edu

catio

n an

d tr

aini

ng in

te

chni

que

for e

mer

-ge

ncie

s by

NO

D

# N

umbe

r of c

ondu

cted

tr

aini

ngs

# th

e nu

mbe

r of p

artic

i-pa

nts

in tr

aini

ng

SC o

f DRR

S

EMA

, MES

T, S

ave

the

Child

ren,

U

NIC

EF, U

ND

P an

d IP

A e

tc.

2016

-202

0Ad

min

istr

ativ

e

3.2.

2. E

xcha

nge

of

expe

rienc

e w

ith

coun

trie

s in

the

regi

on to

inte

grat

e th

e kn

owle

dge

into

th

e cu

rric

ulum

for

DRR

S

# th

e nu

mbe

r of m

utua

l vi

sits

# th

e nu

mbe

r of c

omm

on

initi

ativ

es

SC o

f DRR

S

EMA

, MES

T, S

ave

the

Child

ren,

U

NIC

EF a

nd U

ND

P et

c.

2016

-202

0D

onat

ions

from

or

gani

zatio

ns

It is

incl

uded

in th

e ne

w c

urric

ulum

of

MES

T an

d co

oper

-at

ion

with

Sav

e th

e Ch

ildre

n ha

s st

arte

d to

pre

pare

the

ma-

teria

l for

stu

dent

s in

gr

ades

1-9

3.2.

3. T

he tr

aini

ng

of te

achi

ng s

taff

for

DRR

S

# th

e nu

mbe

r of t

rain

ing

# %

of p

artic

ipan

ts’

know

ledg

e in

crea

se

SC o

f DRR

SEM

A, K

SF, M

EST,

Sa

ve th

e Ch

ildre

n,

UN

ICEF

and

UN

DP

2016

-202

0D

onat

ions

from

or

gani

zatio

ns

Mea

sure

/ St

rate

gic

sub-

obje

ctiv

e: 3

.3. A

war

enes

s ra

isin

g an

d se

nsiti

zing

the

com

mun

ity a

bout

the

impo

rtan

ce o

f nat

ural

dis

aste

r ris

k re

duct

ion

thro

ugh

med

ia c

ampa

igns

, soc

ial n

etw

orks

, tra

inin

gs, e

xerc

ises

and

pro

tect

ion

mea

sure

s.

3.3.

1. O

rgan

izat

ion

of n

atio

nal c

am-

paig

ns fo

r DRR

S (m

edia

and

com

mu-

nity

vis

its)

# nu

mbe

r of c

ampa

igns

# th

e nu

mbe

r of a

ffect

ed

bene

ficia

ries

SC o

f DRR

SEM

A, U

ND

P an

d

NQ

F20

16-2

020

Don

atio

ns fr

om

orga

niza

tions

3.3.

2. S

uppo

rtin

g th

e ac

tiviti

es fo

r the

In

tern

atio

nal D

ay o

f D

RRS

# th

e nu

mbe

r of m

unic

i-pa

litie

s in

volv

ed#

num

ber o

f int

ende

d be

nefic

iarie

s

SC o

f DRR

SEM

A, U

ND

P, N

QF

and

civi

l soc

iety

.20

16-2

020

Don

atio

ns fr

om

orga

niza

tions

Mea

sure

/ St

rate

gic

sub-

obje

ctiv

e: 3

.4.

Org

aniz

atio

n an

d bu

ildin

g of

str

uctu

res

for p

rote

ctio

n-re

scue

and

hel

p (S

PRA

).

3.4.

1. D

raft

ing

the

plan

for t

he e

stab

-lis

hmen

t of S

PRA

# dr

afte

d pl

anSC

of D

RRS

EMA

, Mun

icip

al-

ities

, UN

DP,

NQ

F an

d ci

vil s

ocie

ty20

16-2

017

Adm

inis

trat

ive


4. 2

. Reg

ular

m

eetin

gs b

etw

een

the

auth

oriti

es a

nd

the

emer

genc

y re

-sp

onse

team

s in

the

com

mun

ity

# nu

mbe

r of m

eetin

gs#

the

num

ber o

f par

tici-

pant

s in

mee

tings

SC o

f DRR

SEM

A, M

unic

ipal

-iti

es, U

ND

P, N

QF

and

civi

l soc

iety

2016

-202

0Ad

min

istr

ativ

e

3.4.

3. M

onito

ring

the

prof

essi

onal

an

d vo

lunt

eer

team

s of

em

erge

n-cy

resp

onse

# nu

mbe

r of v

isits

# m

onito

ring

repo

rts

SC o

f DRR

SEM

A, M

unic

ipal

-iti

es, U

ND

P, N

QF

and

civi

l soc

iety

2016

-202

0Ad

min

istr

ativ

e

Mea

sure

/ St

rate

gic

sub-

obje

ctiv

e: 3

.5. I

nvol

vem

ent a

nd o

rgan

izat

ion

of y

outh

and

civ

il so

ciet

y in

SPR

A in

ord

er to

redu

ce th

e ris

k fro

m n

atur

al d

isast

ers.

3.5.

1. T

he ro

und-

tabl

e co

nsul

tatio

n w

ith y

oung

peo

ple

and

civi

l soc

iety

for

SPRA

# nu

mbe

r of r

ound

tabl

e co

nsul

tatio

ns#

% o

f par

ticip

ants

sat

is-

fied

with

roun

dtab

le c

on-

sulta

tions

SC o

f DRR

SEM

A, M

unic

ipal

-iti

es, U

ND

P, N

QF

and

civi

l soc

iety

2016

-202

0D

onat

ions

3.5.

2. C

omm

on

cam

paig

ns b

e-tw

een

SPRA

you

th

and

civi

l soc

iety

# nu

mbe

r of c

ampa

igns

# th

e nu

mbe

r of p

artic

i-pa

nts

invo

lved

SC o

f DRR

SEM

A, M

unic

ipal

-iti

es, U

ND

P, N

QF

and

civi

l soc

iety

2016

-202

0D

onat

ions

Mea

sure

/ St

rate

gic

sub-

obje

ctiv

e: 3

.6.

Invo

lvem

ent o

f vul

nera

ble

com

mun

ity (p

regn

ant w

omen

, chi

ldre

n, o

ld p

eopl

e, p

erso

ns w

ith c

hron

icle

dis

ease

, pe

rson

s w

ith d

isab

ilitie

s, et

c.) i

n dr

aftin

g of

pla

ns fo

r ris

k m

anag

emen

t.

3.6.

1. Id

entifi

catio

n of

repr

esen

tativ

es

from

vul

nera

ble

com

mun

ities

# no

tes

from

con

sulta

-tio

ns w

ith re

leva

nt s

take

-ho

lder

s

SC o

f DRR

SEM

A, M

unic

ipal

-iti

es, U

ND

P, N

QF

and

civi

l soc

iety

2016

-202

0Ad

min

istr

ativ

e

3.6.

2. M

obili

zatio

n of

com

mun

ity p

rej-

udic

e in

dev

elop

ing

risk

man

agem

ent

plan

s

# nu

mbe

r of m

eetin

gs#

the

num

ber o

f rep

re-

sent

ativ

es fr

om d

iffer

ent

com

mun

ities

SC o

f DRR

SEM

A, M

unic

ipal

-iti

es, U

ND

P, N

QF

and

civi

l soc

iety

2016

-202

0D

onat

ions


3.4.

2. R

egul

ar

mee

tings

bet

wee

n th

e au

thor

ities

and

th

e em

erge

ncy

re-

spon

se te

ams

in th

e co

mm

unity

# nu

mbe

r of m

eetin

gs#

the

num

ber o

f par

tici-

pant

s in

mee

tings

SC o

f DRR

SEM

A, M

unic

ipal

-iti

es, U

ND

P, N

QF

and

civi

l soc

iety

2016

-202

0Ad

min

istr

ativ

e

3.4.

3. M

onito

ring

the

prof

essi

onal

an

d vo

lunt

eer

team

s of

em

erge

n-cy

resp

onse

# nu

mbe

r of v

isits

# m

onito

ring

repo

rts

SC o

f DRR

SEM

A, M

unic

ipal

-iti

es, U

ND

P, N

QF

and

civi

l soc

iety

2016

-202

0Ad

min

istr

ativ

e

Mea

sure

/ St

rate

gic

sub-

obje

ctiv

e: 3

.5. I

nvol

vem

ent a

nd o

rgan

izat

ion

of y

outh

and

civ

il so

ciet

y in

SPR

A in

ord

er to

redu

ce th

e ris

k fro

m n

atur

al d

isast

ers.

3.5.

1. T

he ro

und-

tabl

e co

nsul

tatio

n w

ith y

oung

peo

ple

and

civi

l soc

iety

for

SPRA

# nu

mbe

r of r

ound

tabl

e co

nsul

tatio

ns#

% o

f par

ticip

ants

sat

is-

fied

with

roun

dtab

le c

on-

sulta

tions

SC o

f DRR

SEM

A, M

unic

ipal

-iti

es, U

ND

P, N

QF

and

civi

l soc

iety

2016

-202

0D

onat

ions

3.5.

2. C

omm

on

cam

paig

ns b

e-tw

een

SPRA

you

th

and

civi

l soc

iety

# nu

mbe

r of c

ampa

igns

# th

e nu

mbe

r of p

artic

i-pa

nts

invo

lved

SC o

f DRR

SEM

A, M

unic

ipal

-iti

es, U

ND

P, N

QF

and

civi

l soc

iety

2016

-202

0D

onat

ions

Mea

sure

/ St

rate

gic

sub-

obje

ctiv

e: 3

.6.

Invo

lvem

ent o

f vul

nera

ble

com

mun

ity (p

regn

ant w

omen

, chi

ldre

n, o

ld p

eopl

e, p

erso

ns w

ith c

hron

icle

dis

ease

, pe

rson

s w

ith d

isab

ilitie

s, et

c.) i

n dr

aftin

g of

pla

ns fo

r ris

k m

anag

emen

t.

3.6.

1. Id

entifi

catio

n of

repr

esen

tativ

es

from

vul

nera

ble

com

mun

ities

# no

tes

from

con

sulta

-tio

ns w

ith re

leva

nt s

take

-ho

lder

s

SC o

f DRR

SEM

A, M

unic

ipal

-iti

es, U

ND

P, N

QF

and

civi

l soc

iety

2016

-202

0Ad

min

istr

ativ

e

3.6.

2. M

obili

zatio

n of

com

mun

ity p

rej-

udic

e in

dev

elop

ing

risk

man

agem

ent

plan

s

# nu

mbe

r of m

eetin

gs#

the

num

ber o

f rep

re-

sent

ativ

es fr

om d

iffer

ent

com

mun

ities

SC o

f DRR

SEM

A, M

unic

ipal

-iti

es, U

ND

P, N

QF

and

civi

l soc

iety

2016

-202

0D

onat

ions

Stra

tegi

c ob

ject

ive:

4.

Aw

aren

ess

rais

ing

and

urgi

ng o

f the

inst

itut

ions

and

ent

itie

s fo

r ris

ks fr

om N

OD

Mea

sure

/ St

rate

gic

sub-

obje

ctiv

e: 4

.1. P

rom

otio

n an

d de

velo

pmen

t of i

nstr

umen

ts a

nd p

rogr

amm

es th

at d

raft

sta

ndar

ds, c

odes

, ope

ratio

nal i

nstr

uc-

tions

, pla

ns, p

roje

cts,

etc.

4.1.

1.

Prom

otio

n an

d de

velo

pmen

t of

inst

rum

ents

ba

sed

on p

rofe

s-si

onal

rese

arch

# th

e nu

mbe

r of i

nstr

u-m

ents

# th

e nu

mbe

r of p

artic

i-pa

ting

stak

ehol

ders

SC o

f DRR

SEM

A, K

ASA

UN

DP,

NQ

F an

d ci

vil s

o-ci

ety

2016

-202

0Ad

min

istr

ativ

e

4.1.

2. C

onsu

ltatio

n of

exp

erts

in th

e re

-gi

on a

nd E

urop

e

# ag

reem

ent w

ith th

e ex

pert

s#

mee

tings

with

exp

erts

SC o

f DRR

SEM

A, U

ND

P, N

QF

and

civi

l soc

iety

2016

-202

0D

onat

ions

Mea

sure

/ St

rate

gic

sub-

obje

ctiv

e: 4

.2. I

mpr

ovem

ent o

f com

mun

icat

ion

and

exch

ange

of i

nfor

mat

ion

betw

een

rele

vant

inst

itutio

ns in

risk

iden

tifica

-tio

n an

d as

sess

men

t

4.2.

1. T

he id

entifi

-ca

tion

of n

eeds

for

com

mun

icat

ion

im-

prov

emen

t and

in-

form

atio

n ex

chan

ge

# co

nsul

tatio

n m

eetin

gs#

reco

mm

enda

tions

for

impr

ovem

ent o

f the

com

-m

unic

atio

n

SC D

RRS

EMA

, Mun

icip

al-

ities

, UN

DP,

NQ

F an

d ci

vil s

ocie

ty

2016

-202

0

Adm

inis

trat

ive

4.2.

2. O

rgan

izin

g co

urse

s w

ith th

e re

leva

nt in

stitu

tions

# th

e nu

mbe

r of o

rgan

-iz

ed c

ours

es

#% o

f par

ticip

ants

’ add

ed

know

ledg

e

SC D

RRS

EMA

, Mun

icip

al-

ities

, UN

DP,

NQ

F an

d ci

vil s

ocie

ty

2016

-202

0

Adm

inis

trat

ive

EMA

-KA

PS

Mea

sure

/ St

rate

gic

sub-

obje

ctiv

e: 4

.3. D

eepe

ning

of i

nteg

ratio

n of

str

ateg

y an

d co

ordi

natio

n of

the

activ

ities

of t

he re

leva

nt in

stitu

tions

in th

e ris

k id

entifi

catio

n pr

oces

s, as

sess

men

t and

taki

ng o

f pro

tect

ion

mea

sure

s;

4.3.

1. S

C D

RRS

sup-

port

thro

ugh

the

crea

tion

of a

bud

get

(mee

tings

, pub

lica-

tions

, mon

itorin

g vi

sits

, etc

.)

# nu

mbe

r of m

eetin

gs,

publ

icat

ions

, vis

its#

% L

evel

of s

uppo

rt o

f su

ppor

t fro

m P

M

SC o

f DRR

S

The

Gov

ernm

ent

of th

e Re

publ

ic o

f Ko

sovo

, Inte

rnat

ion-

al O

rgan

izat

ions

, M

inist

ry o

f Fin

ance

, U

ND

P, U

NIC

EF, IP

A Pr

ogra

m, G

IZ, U

SAID

an

d N

GO

s.

2016

-202

0D

onat

ions

52 DISASTER RISK REDUCTION STRATEGY AND PLAN OF ACTION 2016 - 2020M

easu

re /

Stra

tegi

c su

b-ob

ject

ive:

4.4

. Dev

elop

men

t of q

ualit

y st

anda

rds

such

as

cert

ifica

tion

and

ackn

owle

dgem

ent f

or d

isas

ter r

isk

man

agem

ent

with

par

ticip

atio

n of

the

priv

ate

sect

or, c

ivil

soci

ety,

org

anis

atio

ns a

nd a

ssoc

iatio

ns;

4.3.

1 Si

gnin

g ag

ree-

men

ts w

ith s

cien

-tifi

c na

tiona

l and

in

tern

atio

nal i

nsti-

tutio

ns fo

r the

pre

-ve

ntio

n of

new

risk

s in

rele

vant

fiel

ds.

# id

entifi

catio

n of

inst

itu-

tions

# nu

mbe

r of s

igne

d ag

reem

ents

SC o

f DRR

S

UN

DP,

UN

ICEF

, IP

A p

rogr

am, G

IZ,

USA

ID, J

ICA

and

N

GO

s.

2016

-202

0Ad

min

istr

ativ

e

4.3.

2. Im

plem

enta

-tio

n of

agr

eem

ents

w

ith s

cien

tific

na-

tiona

l and

inte

rna-

tiona

l ins

titut

ions

fo

r the

pre

vent

ion

of n

ew ri

sks

in re

le-

vant

fiel

ds.

# th

e nu

mbe

r of c

omm

on

initi

ativ

es

# th

e nu

mbe

r of s

take

-ho

lder

s pa

rtic

ipat

ing

in

initi

ativ

es

SC o

f DRR

SU

ND

P, U

NIC

EF, I

PA

prog

ram

, GIZ

, US-

AID

and

NG

Os.

2016

-202

0Ad

min

istr

ativ

e

Mea

sure

/ St

rate

gic

sub-

obje

ctiv

e: 4

.5. P

rom

otio

n an

d su

ppor

t of a

gree

men

ts fo

r reg

iona

l and

inte

rnat

iona

l coo

pera

tion

4.5.

1. T

he d

evel

op-

men

t of c

oope

ra-

tion

agre

emen

ts

# id

entif

ying

the

field

s fo

r su

ppor

t#

appr

oval

of a

gree

men

tsSC

of D

RRS

UN

DP,

UN

ICEF

, IPA

pr

ogra

m, G

IZ, U

S-A

ID a

nd N

GO

s.

2016

-202

0Ad

min

istr

ativ

e

4.5.

2. D

raft

ing

the

Ac

tion

Plan

s fo

r im

plem

enta

tion

of

agre

emen

ts

# id

entifi

catio

n of

par

tici-

patin

g in

stitu

tions

# Ac

tion

Plan

doc

umen

tSC

of D

RRS

UN

DP,

UN

ICEF

, IPA

pr

ogra

m, G

IZ, U

S-A

ID a

nd N

GO

s.

2016

-202

0Ad

min

istr

ativ

e

Mea

sure

/ St

rate

gic

sub-

obje

ctiv

e: 4

.6. P

rovi

sion

of q

ualit

y in

form

atio

n, a

sses

smen

t, de

velo

ping

of s

tatis

tics/

data

base

s as

wel

l as

mon

itorin

g of

tren

ds

rela

ted

to n

ew ri

sks

and

natu

ral d

isas

ters

.

4.6.

1Mon

itorin

g th

e fu

nctio

ning

of

Koso

vo S

eism

o-lo

gica

l Net

wor

k,

seis

mic

act

ivity

of

the

coun

try

as w

ell

as th

e co

llect

ion,

pr

eser

vatio

n, p

ro-

cess

ing,

ana

lysi

s an

d pu

blic

atio

n of

se

ism

olog

ical

dat

a

# nu

mbe

r of m

eetin

gs

# th

e re

port

for t

he s

up-

port

offe

red

SC o

f DRR

SM

ED a

nd IO

2016

-202

0

Mea

sure

/ St

rate

gic

sub-

obje

ctiv

e: 4

.7. P

rom

otio

n of

pro

toco

ls, e

xcha

nge

of in

form

atio

n an

d re

gion

al c

oope

ratio

n to

faci

litat

e th

e ex

chan

ge o

f cap

aci-

ties

and

the

crea

tion

of fa

cilit

ies

for e

mer

genc

y re

spon

se d

urin

g an

d af

ter d

isas

ters

.

4.7.

1. Id

entif

ying

th

e ne

eds

for c

a-pa

citie

s ex

chan

ge

betw

een

mun

icip

al-

ities

# nu

mbe

r of m

eetin

gs

with

mun

icip

aliti

es#

repo

rts

from

mee

tings

w

ith m

unic

ipal

ities

SC o

f DRR

S

MLG

A, m

unic

ipal

-iti

es, U

ND

P, N

GO

s an

d ci

vil s

ocie

ty20

16-2

020

Adm

inis

trat

ive

4.7.

2. D

raft

ing

of re

-gi

onal

pro

toco

ls to

fa

cilit

ate

exch

ange

ca

paci

ty

# nu

mbe

r of r

egio

nal p

ro-

toco

ls#

the

num

ber o

f mun

ic-

ipal

ities

that

app

rove

pr

otoc

ols

SC o

f DRR

S

MLG

A, m

unic

ipal

-iti

es, U

ND

P, N

GO

s an

d ci

vil s

ocie

ty20

16-2

020

Adm

inis

trat

ive

Tota

l46

8,50

0.01

for

th

ree

year

s


Mea

sure

/ St

rate

gic

sub-

obje

ctiv

e: 4

.4. D

evel

opm

ent o

f qua

lity

stan

dard

s su

ch a

s ce

rtifi

catio

n an

d ac

know

ledg

emen

t for

dis

aste

r ris

k m

anag

emen

t w

ith p

artic

ipat

ion

of th

e pr

ivat

e se

ctor

, civ

il so

ciet

y, o

rgan

isat

ions

and

ass

ocia

tions

;

4.3.

1 Si

gnin

g ag

ree-

men

ts w

ith s

cien

-tifi

c na

tiona

l and

in

tern

atio

nal i

nsti-

tutio

ns fo

r the

pre

-ve

ntio

n of

new

risk

s in

rele

vant

fiel

ds.

# id

entifi

catio

n of

inst

itu-

tions

# nu

mbe

r of s

igne

d ag

reem

ents

SC o

f DRR

S

UN

DP,

UN

ICEF

, IP

A p

rogr

am, G

IZ,

USA

ID, J

ICA

and

N

GO

s.

2016

-202

0Ad

min

istr

ativ

e

4.3.

2. Im

plem

enta

-tio

n of

agr

eem

ents

w

ith s

cien

tific

na-

tiona

l and

inte

rna-

tiona

l ins

titut

ions

fo

r the

pre

vent

ion

of n

ew ri

sks

in re

le-

vant

fiel

ds.

# th

e nu

mbe

r of c

omm

on

initi

ativ

es

# th

e nu

mbe

r of s

take

-ho

lder

s pa

rtic

ipat

ing

in

initi

ativ

es

SC o

f DRR

SU

ND

P, U

NIC

EF, I

PA

prog

ram

, GIZ

, US-

AID

and

NG

Os.

2016

-202

0Ad

min

istr

ativ

e

Mea

sure

/ St

rate

gic

sub-

obje

ctiv

e: 4

.5. P

rom

otio

n an

d su

ppor

t of a

gree

men

ts fo

r reg

iona

l and

inte

rnat

iona

l coo

pera

tion

4.5.

1. T

he d

evel

op-

men

t of c

oope

ra-

tion

agre

emen

ts

# id

entif

ying

the

field

s fo

r su

ppor

t#

appr

oval

of a

gree

men

tsSC

of D

RRS

UN

DP,

UN

ICEF

, IPA

pr

ogra

m, G

IZ, U

S-A

ID a

nd N

GO

s.

2016

-202

0Ad

min

istr

ativ

e

4.5.

2. D

raft

ing

the

Ac

tion

Plan

s fo

r im

plem

enta

tion

of

agre

emen

ts

# id

entifi

catio

n of

par

tici-

patin

g in

stitu

tions

# Ac

tion

Plan

doc

umen

tSC

of D

RRS

UN

DP,

UN

ICEF

, IPA

pr

ogra

m, G

IZ, U

S-A

ID a

nd N

GO

s.

2016

-202

0Ad

min

istr

ativ

e

Mea

sure

/ St

rate

gic

sub-

obje

ctiv

e: 4

.6. P

rovi

sion

of q

ualit

y in

form

atio

n, a

sses

smen

t, de

velo

ping

of s

tatis

tics/

data

base

s as

wel

l as

mon

itorin

g of

tren

ds

rela

ted

to n

ew ri

sks

and

natu

ral d

isas

ters

.

4.6.

1Mon

itorin

g th

e fu

nctio

ning

of

Koso

vo S

eism

o-lo

gica

l Net

wor

k,

seis

mic

act

ivity

of

the

coun

try

as w

ell

as th

e co

llect

ion,

pr

eser

vatio

n, p

ro-

cess

ing,

ana

lysi

s an

d pu

blic

atio

n of

se

ism

olog

ical

dat

a

# nu

mbe

r of m

eetin

gs

# th

e re

port

for t

he s

up-

port

offe

red

SC o

f DRR

SM

ED a

nd IO

2016

-202

0

Mea

sure

/ St

rate

gic

sub-

obje

ctiv

e: 4

.7. P

rom

otio

n of

pro

toco

ls, e

xcha

nge

of in

form

atio

n an

d re

gion

al c

oope

ratio

n to

faci

litat

e th

e ex

chan

ge o

f cap

aci-

ties

and

the

crea

tion

of fa

cilit

ies

for e

mer

genc

y re

spon

se d

urin

g an

d af

ter d

isas

ters

.

4.7.

1. Id

entif

ying

th

e ne

eds

for c

a-pa

citie

s ex

chan

ge

betw

een

mun

icip

al-

ities

# nu

mbe

r of m

eetin

gs

with

mun

icip

aliti

es#

repo

rts

from

mee

tings

w

ith m

unic

ipal

ities

SC o

f DRR

S

MLG

A, m

unic

ipal

-iti

es, U

ND

P, N

GO

s an

d ci

vil s

ocie

ty20

16-2

020

Adm

inis

trat

ive

4.7.

2. D

raft

ing

of re

-gi

onal

pro

toco

ls to

fa

cilit

ate

exch

ange

ca

paci

ty

# nu

mbe

r of r

egio

nal p

ro-

toco

ls#

the

num

ber o

f mun

ic-

ipal

ities

that

app

rove

pr

otoc

ols

SC o

f DRR

S

MLG

A, m

unic

ipal

-iti

es, U

ND

P, N

GO

s an

d ci

vil s

ocie

ty20

16-2

020

Adm

inis

trat

ive

Tota

l46

8,50

0.01

for

th

ree

year

s

disaster risk reduction strategy and plan of action … anglisht_1-1.pdf · disaster risk reduction...

Documents