disappointment by design mysa 2011 s anderson
TRANSCRIPT
Disappointment by Design
Developing capacity and resilience in young adolescents in a "pro-risk" school environment
Scott Anderson
Director of Students (Middle School)
Nazareth College, Noble Park North, Victoria
Risk Taking in Context – Our Teens
Want their developing young adulthood to be acknowledged
Lack judgement regarding physical risks, yet socially risk-averse
Constantly test the boundaries of their changing world
Want less boundaries but actually need more than ever
Lack meaningful opportunities to develop capacity through responsible risk taking
Lack resilience
Risk Taking in Context – Our Parents
More aware of risks and perceived risks
More protective
React to the emotions of their children but often lack the time to invest in addressing them
Fear being disliked by their children
More willing to “go to bat” for their children
Prone to “rescuing”
Risk Taking in Context – Our Schools
Increasingly responsible for managing, reducing and eliminating risk
Have parent bodies that do not hesitate to challenge
Under ever-increasing pressures to “do more”
Under ever-increasing external pressures to perform
In many communities, we are failing miserably doing much more than keeping our children vacuum-safe. They are not getting the experiences they need to grow up well. An entire generation of children from middle class homes, in downtown row houses, apartment blocks, and copycat suburbs, whose good fortune it is to have sidewalks and neighbourhoodwatch programs, crossing guards, and playground monitors, are not being provided with the opportunities they need to learn how to navigate their way through life’s challenges. We don’t intend any harm. Quite the contrary. In our mania to provide emotional life jackets around our kids, helmets and seatbelts, approved playground equipment, after-school supervision, an endless stream of evening programming, and no place to hang out but the tiled flooring of our local mall, we parents are accidentally creating a generation of youth who are not ready for life. Our children are too safe for their own good.—From Too Safe for Their Own Good
What do Responsible Risk-Taking Parents Do?
Provide capacity building experiences for their children
Let kids “have a go” even when it takes more time or the end result isn’t as good
Provide meaningful rights of passage with appropriate amounts of risk (Ungar) – “right level of danger”
Admit their mistakes
Support and guide without “rescuing”
Respond to challenges and disappointments in ways that build resilience
What do Responsible Risk-Taking Teachers Do?
Share something of who they are – risk being ‘real’.
Rely on relationship to teach and manage – not power.
Create safe classroom environments to enable student risk-taking.
Encourage trial and error
Celebrate successes
Relinquish control.
Avoid ‘rescuing’.
What do Responsible Risk-Taking Teachers Do?
Differentiate the curriculum to attempt to direct each student to the right level of challenge.
Communicate with parents about appropriate levels of challenge for students
Admit what they don’t know.
Model risk-taking by trying new things themselves
Prioritise processes over ‘correctness’ – use a range of assessment strategies
What do Responsible Risk-Taking Schools Do?
Provide parents with resources and support
Avoiding owning issues that are actually parenting issues – e.g. online behaviour outside of school
Ask students to live beyond themselves – engage in service and the community
Provide new experiences and challenges for students with the right level of ris
What do Responsible Risk-Taking Schools Do?
Know their core values and practices, and don’t apologise for them.
Address external pressures without sacrificing core values.
Be clear to parents on what they do and don’t promise.
Develop a healthy attitude to conflict and disagreement
Celebrate success