directorate: strategic people management · subject: determination and directive on the performance...
TRANSCRIPT
Directorate: Strategic People Management
Lower Parliament Street, Cape Town, 8001 Private Bag X9114, Cape Town, 8000
Tel: +27 21 467 2539 Fax: +27 21 467 2760 Employment and salary enquiries: 0861 92 33 22
Safe Schools: 0800 45 46 47 www.westerncape.gov.za
Reference: 20180212-9189
3/3/3/1/5
Enquiries: Call Centre
Strategic People Management Minute: 0002/2018
To: Deputy Directors-General; Chief Directors; Directors; Deputy Directors; Circuit
Managers; Heads: Management and Governance; Heads: District Curriculum
Support; Heads: District Learner Support; Principals and all Public Service Staff
Subject: Determination and directive on the Performance Management and
Development System for public service employees on salary level 1 to 12 other
than members of the Senior Management Service
1. The Department of Public Service and Administration (DPSA) issued DPSA Circular 5 of
2017, dated 15 September 2017, to inform departments on the changes of the
Performance Management and Development System (PMDS) as well as the attached
Determination and Directive on the PMDS for employees other than members of the
Senior Management Service (SMS) to assist departments with the implementation.
2. The Determination and Directive on the PMDS for employees other than members of
the SMS issued in terms of sections 3(1), 3(2) and 4(3) of the Public Service Act, 1994
(Act 103 of 1994), read with regulations 71 and 72 of Public Service Regulation (PSR),
2016, published in Government Gazette No. 40167 of 29 July 2016, will be effective
from 01 April 2018.
3. The management of performance should still be done in a consultative, supportive
and non-discriminatory manner to enhance organisational efficiency, effectiveness
and accountability for the use of resources and the achievement of organisational
goals. Cognisance should be taken of the following major key changes:
3.1 Each Key Result Area (KRA) should be weighted as a percentage according to the
level of importance and impact it has in the employee's job. The weighting of all the
KRAs should aggregate to 100%. Note: The weight of each KRA shall not be less than
10% and shall not exceed 30%.
3.2 Employees shall identify, discuss and agree on the Generic Assessment Factors (GAFs)
that are most relevant to their area of work. The attached GAFs shall not be weighted
or assessed independently, but must be incorporated and assessed in an integrated
manner with the KRAs. GAFs describe the competency requirements, taking into
2
consideration the knowledge, skills and attributes relevant to the employee’s work, i.e.
job knowledge, technical skills, acceptance of responsibility, quality of work, reliability,
initiative, communication, interpersonal relationships, flexibility, team work, planning
and execution, leadership, delegation and empowerment, and the management of
human and financial resources.
3.3 The conducting of mid-year performance reviews and annual performance
assessments are compulsory and must be in writing. The annual assessment shall
reflect the performance of the employee for the entire performance cycle (April to
March).
3.4 A four-point rating scale shall be used to assess the performance of employees other
than members of the SMS. A rating of "3" on the scale entails "fully effective". In terms
of this approach to performance rating, an employee who is rated "fully effective" has
fully complied with the requirements of the job.
The table below explains the four-point rating scale, categories of performance and
the associated descriptions:
Rating Category and score Description
1 Not effective
(less or equal to 66%)
Performance does not meet the expected standard
for the job. The review/assessment indicates that the
jobholder has achieved less than fully effective results
against all or almost all of the performance criteria
and indicators as specified in the Performance
Agreement (PA) and Work plan.
2 Partially effective
(67%–99%)
Performance meets some of the standards expected
for the job. The review/assessment indicates that the
jobholder has achieved less than fully effective results
(partially achieved) against more than half of the
performance criteria and indicators as specified in the
PA and Work plan.
3 Fully effective
(100%–119%)
Performance fully meets the standard expected in all
areas of the job. The review/assessment indicates that
the jobholder has achieved, as a minimum, effective
results against all of the performance criteria and
indicators as specified in the PA and Work plan.
4 Highly effective
(120%–133%)
Performance far exceeds the standard expected of a
jobholder at this level. The review/assessment
indicates that the jobholder has achieved better than
fully effective results against more than half/or in all
areas of the performance criteria and indicators as
specified in the PA and Work plan and maintained this
in all areas of responsibility throughout the
3
performance cycle.
3.5 Only whole numbers must be used in the scoring (no decimals numbers, e.g. 3,5, are
allowed).
4. It is important that the due dates as per the SPMDS calendar and planning calendar
for schools are firmly adhered to, especially the dates when the PA and six-monthly
reviews must be submitted. Employees will not benefit from receiving performance
incentives should the documents not be submitted on time.
The due dates for the 2018/2019 cycle are as follow:
Activity Due date
Conclude performance agreements 30 April 2018
Submit certificates 31 May 2018
Conclude training needs and submit certificates 31 May 2018
Conclude six-monthly reviews and submit certificates 28 September 2018
Conclude and submit final assessments scores 19 April 2019
5. Employees are discouraged from amending a PA in the last quarter of a performance
cycle (i.e. January to 31 March), unless changes to the employee’s job description,
job grade, organisational structure of the Western Cape Education Department
(WCED) or its functions or amendments to the objectives and priorities result in
significant changes to the content of the job of the employee. In such cases the
amended PA must be accompanied by a written motivation signed by the supervisor
and the head of the component.
6. If an employee is absent with permission or on precautionary suspension for a
continuous period of three months or longer, the affected employee shall be
regarded as having performed satisfactorily for that period of absence within that
applicable performance cycle (Regulation 72 (12)). Periods of prolonged absence
with permission include all types of approved leave.
7. Mechanisms for dispute resolution must include any differences which might arise out
of performance agreements, performance reviews and assessments. Any
disagreement must first be resolved internally within the
institution/unit/component/branch. If a dispute arises as contemplated in regulation
72(4) of the PSR, the Executive Authority or delegated official shall appoint a
mediator, who shall be an employee, to consider the dispute within one month after
the expiry of the due date for signing of the PA.
8. Employees who are appointed on probation are compelled to complete four
quarterly reviews and a final assessment which will be utilised to confirm their
probation appointments.
4
9. The PMDS policy of the Western Cape Government (WCG) is being amended in line
with the Determination and Directive on the PMDS.
9.1 Head Office and district office-based employees who utilise the Performance
Management Information System (PERMIS) to record PAs and conclude reviews on
are in the process of amendment. The necessary training in this regard will be
provided.
9.2 Support staff at schools will continue to follow the paper-based PA and review
process. The existing forms for the PA and individual development plan, i.e. Annexure
A and B, should still be utilised for the 2018/2019 cycle. Relevant training and training
material will be provided and further communication relating to changes to the six-
monthly and annual performance reviews will follow.
10. Kindly bring the content of this minute to the attention of all staff under your
supervision.
SIGNED: LJ ELY
DEPUTY DIRECTOR-GENERAL: CORPORATE SERVICES
DATE: 2018-03-07