direct support for rural water service delivery

12
Direct support for rural water service delivery London 31 st December 2011

Upload: irc

Post on 26-Jun-2015

927 views

Category:

Business


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Direct support for rural water service delivery

Direct support for

rural water service

delivery

London 31st December 2011

Page 2: Direct support for rural water service delivery

Support for service delivery is often the most neglected area of cost and effort

Page 3: Direct support for rural water service delivery

Why support rural water services?

• Most rural communities cannot manage all of the tasks all of the time

• Shift from ‘volunteerism’ towards more professionalised service provision

• Increasing requirement for oversight and monitoring

• New mandates for local government as ‘service authority’

3

Page 4: Direct support for rural water service delivery

What do we mean by institutional support?

Direct support to communities

‘Post-construction support’

• Data collection

• Monitoring and oversight

• Technical advice

• Administrative and organisational support

• Conflict resolution – the neutral voice

• (re-) training

• Information and links to resources

Indirect support to service authorities (local government)

• Data collation

• Monitoring and oversight

• Specialist technical advice and equipment

• Capacity building and training

• Quality control, norms and standards

• Planning and resource allocation

4

Page 5: Direct support for rural water service delivery

Indirect capacity support to local government

5

• Most commonly central ministry or national agency via deconcentrated offices:

• Uganda - Technical Support Units

• South Africa - Dept. Water Affairs

• Ghana - CWSA regional offices

• Associations of local government – Latin America ‘mancomunidades’

Page 6: Direct support for rural water service delivery

Arrangements for providing direct support

Arrangement for support

agent

Examples

Direct support by local govt.

Burkina Faso, Ghana, Mozambique and Uganda

Central govt. or parastatal

• Honduras - national utility SANAA circuit rider programme • Colombia – unit within national ministry

Associations of community providers

• Honduras – AHJASA; Colombia - AQUACOL • Brazil - Sistema Integrado de Saneamento Rural (SISAR) • USA – RCAP and NRWA; membership organisations

Sub-contracted companies or individuals

• South Africa - Support Services Agency (SSA), which can be a private company or NGO . • Uganda, Malawi - pump mechanics or area-based mechanics • Chile - regional private utilities contracted by Ministry

NGOs • Many on-going implementation programmes – ad hoc basis • El Salvador - Asociación Salvadoreña de Servicios de Agua

Page 7: Direct support for rural water service delivery

Técnico en OyM (TOM) model from Honduras

7

Technical Division Manager

Manager/coordinator Rural Water systems

Senior accountant

North 1 engineer

South 1 engineer

West 1 engineer

Central West

1 engineer

Central East

1 engineer

Atlantic 1 engineer

North 14 TOMS

South 7 TOMS

West 18 TOMS

C. West 18 TOMS

E. West 18 TOMS

Atlantic 6 TOMS

Regular support and back-up to: • Village committees Water boards • Water system operators Municipalities

CENTRAL

LEVEL

REGIONAL

LEVEL

LOCAL

LEVEL

Page 8: Direct support for rural water service delivery

Scope of TOM model from Honduras

• Support to over 4,000 rural communities = 2 m of 3.2 m rural pop.

• Each técnico has ~50 communities with average of 2 visits per year

• Data collection for SIAR – Rural Water Information System

• Established in 1995 by SANAA with financing support from USAID - sustainability?

8

Page 9: Direct support for rural water service delivery

What does direct support cost?

Source: A. Meleg (2011)

Costs of BBA SISAR based in Quixada, Ceará, Brazil

Integrated System for Rural Sanitation 12 staff members: •3 technical staff, • 7 administrative/ commercial •1 social science background •1 responsible for general services

Financing: User tariff, based on metered connections and collection of bills

Coverage: 25 and 112 systems each, representing between 15,000 and 72,000 users.

Direct Support ~ US$3.60 per person per year

Page 10: Direct support for rural water service delivery

Emerging lessons on cost of direct support

• Costs of direct support are significant – accounting for ~ 20 - 25% of all long-term expenditure

• In (lower) middle income countries ~ US$2 – 3 person/year appears to be sufficient order of magnitude

• < US$1 person/year appears too low to be effective

11

Page 11: Direct support for rural water service delivery

Planning for direct support in programming

• Who coordinates and provides long-term support to WASH service delivery?

• How is this currently financed and what are the gaps?

• Is it possible for us to contribute to such support structures?

• Can we make linkages with (local) authorities so that the projects we deliver are supported?

12

Page 12: Direct support for rural water service delivery

Further information

13

‘Arrangements and cost of providing support to rural water service providers’; IRC, 2011

www.waterservicesthatlast.org