digital text front
TRANSCRIPT
Preface
The Fibonacci sequence and the Lucas sequence are the two shining
stars in the vast array of integer sequences. This book is intended for
college undergraduate and graduate students often opt to study
Fibonacci and Lucas numbers because they find them challenging and
exciting. The book contains details about Fibonacci and Lucas
identities, its divisibility properties and also its generalization.
Suggestion for the further improvement of this book will
be highly appreciated.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
I would like to express my gratitude to many people
who gave me their comments and suggestions which influenced
the preparation of the text. I want to thank teachers and friends
for their effective cooperation and great care for preparing this
book.
CONTENTS
CHAPTER TITLE PAGE NO.
CHAPTER โ 1 FIBONACCI AND LUCAS NUMBERS 1
CHAPTER โ 2 FIBONACCI AND LUCAS IDENTITIES 7
CHAPTER โ 3 DIVISIBILITY PROPERTIES 25
CHAPTER โ 4 GENERALIZATIONS 37
REFERENCES 44
CHAPTER โ 1
FIBONACCI AND LUCAS NUMBERS
In the realm of mathematics, many concepts have applications
in multiple mathematical fields. Without these important concepts, every field of
mathematics would be seemingly disjointed and unrelated to topics from other
mathematical fields. One of these concepts was discovered by a man named
Leonardo Pisano during the early 13th century. This particular concept is known
today as the Fibonacci sequence. Since its official introduction to the world by
Leonardo Pisano, the Fibonacci sequence has become one of the most fascinating
concepts in the entire realm of mathematics through its remarkable characteristics;
its useful applications to various mathematical fields such as number theory,
discrete mathematics, and geometry; and its clear demonstration of the aesthetic
nature of God.
The Fibonacci series was derived from the solution to a problem
about rabbits. The problem is:
Suppose there are two new born rabbits, one male and the other female. Find
the number of rabbits produced in a year if
โข Each pair takes one month to become mature:
โข Each pair produces a mixed pair every month, from the second month:
โข All rabbits are immortal
Suppose, that the original pair of rabbits was born on January 1. They take a
month to become mature, so there is still only one pair on February 1. On March 1,
they are two months old and produce a new mixed pair, so total is two pair. So
continuing like this, there will be 3 pairs in April, 5 pairs in May and so on.
It is then seen that at the end of the ๐th month, all of the pairs during the
๐ โ 2 th month has given birth to a new pair of rabbits. So then, the total number
of pairs at the end of the ๐th month is the number from the ๐ โ 1 th month plus a
new pair for each pair of rabbits at the end of the ๐ โ 2 th month. In some
simpler terms, the number of pairs of rabbits at the end of ๐ months is the sum of
the numbers at the end of the two previous months.
Without using rabbits, it is said that in the Fibonacci sequence of numbers,
each number is the sum of the previous two numbers, where the first two numbers
of the sequence are 0 and 1. The numbers generated by the Fibonacci sequence are
one of the most famous examples of a recurrence relation. A recurrence relation is
a relation which uses previous values in the relation and is usually defined by some
fixed numbers in the relation, known as the initial conditions. Writing the
Fibonacci sequence as a function, it is shown that ๐น0 = 0, ๐น1=1, ๐น๐+2 = ๐น๐+1 +
๐น๐ . The recurrence is ๐น๐+2 = ๐น๐+1 + ๐น๐ and the initial conditions are ๐น0 = 0,
๐น1=1.
Then the Fibonacci numbers are 0,1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8,13,...
This yield the following recursive definition of the ๐th Fibonacci number ๐น๐ .
๐น1 = 1
๐น2 = 1
โฎ
๐น๐ = ๐น๐โ1 + ๐น๐โ2, ๐ โฅ 3
Using the formula given above where ๐น๐โ1 and ๐น๐โ2 must be calculated
before adding them together to find ๐น๐ is the most obvious method for calculating
a Fibonacci number. This method requires calculating all of the Fibonacci numbers
with indexes less than ๐ before the value of ๐น๐ can be calculated. There is a fairly
simple formula named after the French mathematician Jacques Phillipe Marie
Binet to find the value of a given Fibonacci number without performing all of the
tedious calculations. If ๐น๐ is the ๐th Fibonacci number , then
๐น๐ =1
5
1 + 5
2
๐
โ 1 โ 5
2
๐
. The โspanโ or โdegreeโ of the recursion is the difference between the
highest and lowest subscripts in the recursion ( ๐ + 1 โ ๐ โ 1 = 2 in the
Fibonacci recursion). Lucas discovered that if the degree is d, there are always d
and at most d โindependentโ sequences satisfying the same recursion (with
different starting values).
In the case where the degree is 2, like the Fibonacci numbers, the recursion can
be written as:
๐(๐ + 1) = ๐ด โ ๐(๐) + ๐ต โ ๐(๐ โ 1)
There are two independent sequences (that is, one is not a multiple of the other)
satisfying this. We can always pick one such that U(1) = 1 and U(2) = 1, and also a
second one such that U(1) = 1 and U(2) = 3 . The second sequence which is
independent of the Fibonacci sequence and starts 1, 3,... is now called the Lucas
sequence after Edouard Lucas. Why choose 2, 1, ... for the start? It is probably
because of the Binet formulas for the Fibonacci and Lucas numbers:
๐น๐ = ๐ผ๐ โ ๐ฝ๐ ๐ผ โ ๐ฝ
๐ฟ๐ = ๐ผ๐ + ๐ฝ๐
where ๐ โฅ 0, ๐ผ = (1 + 5)/2 , and ๐ฝ = (1 โ 5)/2. Then ๐ผ and ๐ฝ are the two
solutions to ๐ฅ2 โ ๐ฅ โ 1 = 0. The fact that the coefficients of ๐ผ๐ and ๐ฝ๐ are equal
in magnitude and opposite in sign in the first formula, and equal in magnitude and
sign in the second, is probably why this is the simplest and easiest second,
independent sequence to take. The first few terms of the Lucas sequence look like
this: 2, 1, 3, 4, 7, 11, 18, 29, 47, 76, 123, ...
Lucas numbers ๐ฟ๐ are defined recursively as follows
๐ฟ1 = 1
๐ฟ2 = 3
โฎ
๐ฟ๐ = ๐ฟ๐โ1 + ๐ฟ๐โ2, ๐ โฅ 3
CHAPTER - 2
FIBONACCI AND LUCAS IDENTITIES
Both Fibonacci and Lucas numbers satisfy numerous identities that have been
discovered over the centuries. In this chapter we explore several of these
fundamental identities.
In doing so, we notice the following interesting pattern:
๐น1 = 1 = 2 โ 1 = ๐น3 โ 1
๐น1 + ๐น2 = 2 = 3 โ 1 = ๐น4 โ 1
๐น1 + ๐น2 + ๐น3 = 4 = 5 โ 1 = ๐น5 โ 1
๐น1 + ๐น2 + ๐น3 + ๐น4 = 7 = 8 โ 1 = ๐น6 โ 1
๐น1 + ๐น2 + ๐น3 + ๐น4 + ๐น5 = 12 = 13 โ 1 = ๐น7 โ 1
Following this pattern, we conjecture that
๐น๐
๐
1
= ๐น๐+2 โ 1
We shall establish the validity of this formula in two ways, but we first state it as a
theorem.
Theorem 2.1 (Lucas, 1876)
๐น๐
๐
1
= ๐น๐+2 โ 1 (2.1)
Proof:
Using the Fibonacci recurrence relation, we have:
๐น1 = ๐น3 โ ๐น2
๐น2 = ๐น4 โ ๐น3
๐น3 = ๐น5 โ ๐น4
โฎ
๐น๐โ1 = ๐น๐+1 โ ๐น๐
๐น๐ = ๐น๐+2 โ ๐น๐+1
Adding these equations, we get:
๐น๐ = ๐น๐+2 โ
๐
1
๐น2 = ๐น๐+2 โ 1
AN ALTERNATE METHOD
An alternate method of proving Identity (2.1) is to apply the Principle of
Mathematical Induction. Since ๐น1 = ๐น3 โ1, the formula works for ๐ = 1.
Now assume it is true for an arbitrary positive integer ๐ โฅ 1 :
๐น๐ = ๐น๐+2 โ 1
๐
1
Then
๐น๐
๐+1
1
= ๐น๐ +
๐
1
๐น๐+1
= (๐น๐+2 โ 1) + ๐น๐+1,by the inductive hypothesis
= (๐น๐+1 + ๐น๐+2) โ 1
= ๐น๐+3 โ 1
Thus, by Principle of Mathematical Induction, the formula is true for every
positive integer ๐.
For example,
๐น๐ =
10
1
๐น12 โ 1 = 144 โ 1 = 143
Theorem 2.2 (Lucas, 1876)
๐น2๐โ1
๐
1
= ๐น2๐ (2.2)
Proof:
Using the Fibonacci recurrence relation, we have
๐น1 = ๐น2 โ ๐น0
๐น3 = ๐น4 โ ๐น2
๐น5 = ๐น6 โ ๐น4
โซถ
๐น2๐โ3 = ๐น2๐โ2 โ ๐น2๐โ4
๐น2๐โ1 = ๐น2๐ โ ๐น2๐โ2
Adding these equations, we get
๐น2๐โ1 = ๐น2๐ โ ๐น0 =
๐
1
๐น2๐ , since ๐น0 = 0
For example,
๐น2๐โ1 = ๐น16 =
8
1
987
Corollary 2.1 (Lucas, 1876)
๐น2๐ =
๐
1
๐น2๐+1 โ 1 (2.3)
Proof:
๐น2๐ =
๐
1
๐น๐ โ
2๐
1
๐น2๐โ1
๐
1
= (๐น2๐+2 โ1) โ ๐น2๐ , by theorems 2.1 and 2.2
= (๐น2๐+2 โ ๐น2๐) โ 1
= ๐น2๐+1 โ 1 , by the Fibonacci recurrence relation
Theorem 2.3 (Cassiniโs Formula)
๐น๐โ1๐น๐+1 โ ๐น๐2 = (โ1)๐ , where ๐ โฅ 1 (2.4)
Proof:
Since ๐น0๐น2 โ ๐น12 = 0 ยท 1 โ 1 = โ1 = (โ1)1, the given statement is clearly
true when ๐ = 1.
Now we assume it is true for an arbitrary positive integer k: :
๐น๐โ1๐น๐+1 โ ๐น๐2 = (โ1)๐ . Then,
๐น๐๐น๐+2 โ ๐น๐+12 = (๐น๐+1 โ ๐น๐โ1)(๐น๐ + ๐น๐+1) โ ๐น๐+1
2
= ๐น๐๐น๐+1 + ๐น๐+12 โ ๐น๐๐น๐โ1 โ ๐น๐โ1๐น๐+1 โ ๐น๐+1
2
= ๐น๐๐น๐+1 โ ๐น๐๐น๐โ1 โ๐น๐2 โ (โ1)๐ by the inductive hypothesis
= ๐น๐๐น๐+1 โ ๐น๐ ๐น๐โ1 + ๐น๐ + (โ1)๐+1
= ๐น๐๐น๐+1 โ ๐น๐๐น๐+1 + (โ1)๐+1
= (โ1)๐+1
Thus the formula works for ๐ = ๐ + 1. So, by the Principle of Mathematical
Induction, the statement is true for every integer ๐ โฅ 1.
Corollary 2.2
Any two consecutive Fibonacci numbers are relatively prime; that is,
(๐น๐+1,๐น๐ ) = 1 for every ๐.
Proof:
Let p be a prime factor of both ๐น๐ and ๐น๐+1. Then, by Cassini's formula,
p|ยฑ1 , which is a contradiction.
Thus (๐น๐+1,๐น๐ ) = 1.
Theorem 2.4 (Lucas, 1876)
๐น๐2 = ๐น๐๐น๐+1
๐
1
Proof:
When ๐ = 1,
L. H. S = ๐น๐2
1
1
= ๐น12 = 1 = 1 ยท 1 = ๐น1 ยท ๐น2 = R. H. S
So the result is true when ๐ = 1.
Assume it is true for an arbitrary positive integer ๐ :
๐น๐2
๐
1
= ๐น๐ ๐น๐+1
Then,
๐น๐2 =
๐+1
1
๐น๐2 +
๐
1
๐น๐+12
= ๐น๐๐น๐+1 + ๐น๐+12 , by the inductive hypothesis
= ๐น๐+1 (๐น๐ + ๐น๐+1)
= ๐น๐+1๐น๐+2 , by the Fibonacci recurrence relation.
So the statement is true when ๐ = ๐ + 1.Thus it is true for every positive integer ๐.
For example,
๐น๐2 = ๐น15
15
1
๐น16 = 610 ยท 987 = 602070
Interestingly enough, identities 2.1 through 2.5 have analogous results for
Lucas number also.
Result 2.1
๐ฟ๐ =
๐
1
๐ฟ๐+2 โ 3 (2.6)
Proof:
Using the Lucas recurrence relation, we have,
๐ฟ1 = ๐ฟ3 โ ๐ฟ2
๐ฟ2 = ๐ฟ4 โ ๐ฟ3
๐ฟ3 = ๐ฟ5 โ ๐ฟ4
โซถ
๐ฟ๐โ1 = ๐ฟ๐+1 โ ๐ฟ๐
๐ฟ๐ = ๐ฟ๐+2 โ ๐ฟ๐+1
Adding these equations, we get ,
๐ฟ๐ =
๐
1
๐ฟ๐+2 โ ๐ฟ2
= ๐ฟ๐+2 โ 3
Result 2.2
๐ฟ2๐โ1 =
๐
1
๐ฟ2๐ โ 2 (2.7)
Proof:
Using the Lucas recurrence relations, we have,
๐ฟ1 = ๐ฟ2 โ ๐ฟ0
๐ฟ3 = ๐ฟ4 โ ๐ฟ2
๐ฟ5 = ๐ฟ6 โ ๐ฟ4
โซถ
๐ฟ2๐โ3 = ๐ฟ2๐โ2 โ ๐ฟ2๐โ4
๐ฟ2๐โ1 = ๐ฟ2๐ โ ๐ฟ2๐โ2
Adding these equations, we get,
๐ฟ2๐โ1 =
๐
1
๐ฟ2๐ โ ๐ฟ0
= ๐ฟ2๐ โ 2
For example,
๐ฟ2๐โ1 = 15125 = 15127 โ 2 = ๐ฟ20 โ 2
10
1
Result 2.3
๐ฟ2๐ =
๐
1
๐ฟ2๐+1 โ 1 (2.8)
Proof:
๐ฟ2๐ =
๐
1
๐ฟ๐
2๐
1
โ ๐ฟ2๐โ1
๐
1
= (๐ฟ2๐+2 โ 3) โ (๐ฟ2๐ โ 2)
= ๐ฟ2๐+2 โ ๐ฟ2๐ โ 1
= ๐ฟ2๐+1 โ 1 , by the Lucas recurrence relation.
Result 2.4
๐ฟ๐โ1๐ฟ๐+1 โ ๐ฟ๐2 = 5(โ1)๐โ1 (2.9)
Proof:
Since ๐ฟ๐๐ฟ2 โ ๐ฟ12 = 2 ห 3 โ 12
= 6 โ 1
= 5
= 5(โ1)1โ1
The given statement is clearly true when ๐ = 1. Now we assume it is true for an
arbitrary positive integer ๐, ๐ฟ๐โ1๐ฟ๐+1 โ ๐ฟ๐2 = 5(โ1)๐โ1
Then,
, ๐ฟ๐๐ฟ๐+2 โ ๐ฟ๐+12 = ๐ฟ๐+1 โ ๐ฟ๐โ1 ๐ฟ๐ + ๐ฟ๐+1 โ ๐ฟ๐+1
2
= ๐ฟ๐๐ฟ๐+1 + ๐ฟ๐+12 โ ๐ฟ๐๐ฟ๐โ1 โ ๐ฟ๐โ1๐ฟ๐+1 โ ๐ฟ๐+1
2
= ๐ฟ๐๐ฟ๐+1 โ ๐ฟ๐๐ฟ๐โ1 โ ๐ฟ๐2 โ 5 โ1 ๐โ1
= ๐ฟ๐๐ฟ๐+1 โ ๐ฟ๐ ๐ฟ๐โ1 + ๐ฟ๐ + 5(โ1)๐
= ๐ฟ๐๐ฟ๐+1 โ ๐ฟ๐๐ฟ๐+1 + 5(โ1)๐
= 5(โ1)๐
Thus the formula works for ๐ = ๐ + 1.
So, by the Principle of Mathematical Induction, the statement is true for every
integer ๐ โฅ 1.
Result 2.5
๐ฟ๐2 =
๐
1
๐ฟ๐๐ฟ๐+1 โ 2 (2.10)
Proof:
When ๐ = 1,
L. H. S = ๐ฟ๐2
1
1
= ๐ฟ12
= 1 = 1 ยท 3 โ 2
= ๐น1๐น2 โ 2
= R. H. S
So the result is true when ๐ = 1.
Assume it is true for an arbitrary positive integer ๐, ๐ฟ๐2 =
๐
1
๐ฟ๐๐ฟ๐+1 . Then,
๐ฟ๐2 =
๐+1
1
๐ฟ๐2 +
๐
1
๐ฟ๐+12
= ๐ฟ๐๐ฟ๐+1 โ 2 + ๐ฟ๐+12 , by the inductive hypothesis
= ๐ฟ๐+1 ๐ฟ๐ + ๐ฟ๐+1 โ 2
= ๐ฟ๐+1๐ฟ๐+2 โ 2 , by the Lucas recurrence relation
So the statement is true when ๐ = ๐ + 1.
Thus it is true for every positive integer ๐.
For example,
๐ฟ๐2 =
๐
1
24475 = 24477 โ 2 = 123 ยท 199 โ 2 = ๐ฟ10๐ฟ11 โ 2
Theorem 2.5
๐น๐+๐ = ๐น๐โ1๐น๐ + ๐น๐๐น๐+1
Proof:
We shall prove the theorem by induction on ๐.
For ๐ = 1, we get ๐น๐+1 = ๐น๐โ1๐น1 + ๐น๐๐น1+1 = ๐น๐โ1 + ๐น๐ which is true.
Suppose that it is true for ๐ = ๐ and ๐ = ๐ + 1,we shall prove it is also true for
๐ = ๐ + 2.
Let ๐น๐+๐ = ๐น๐โ1๐น๐ + ๐น๐๐น๐+1 and ๐น๐+(๐+1) = ๐น๐โ1๐น๐+1 + ๐น๐๐น๐+2.
Adding these two equations, we get
๐น๐+(๐+2) = ๐น๐โ1๐น๐+2 + ๐น๐๐น๐+3
Hence, ๐น๐+๐ = ๐น๐โ1๐น๐ + ๐น๐๐น๐+1.
Note:
To derive new identities, we now present an explicit formula for ๐น๐ .
Let ๐ผ and ๐ฝ be the roots of the quadratic equation ๐ฅ2 โ ๐ฅ โ 1 = 0,
so, ๐ผ = (1 + 5)/2 and ๐ฝ = (1 โ 5)/2
Then ๐ผ + ๐ฝ = 1 and ๐ผ๐ฝ = โ1
Besides, ๐ผ2 = ๐ผ (1 โ ๐ฝ) = ๐ผ โ ๐ผ๐ฝ = ๐ผ + 1
๐ผ3 = ๐ผ(๐ผ + 1) = ๐ผ2 + ๐ผ = 2๐ผ + 1
and ๐ผ4 = ๐ผ 2๐ผ + 1 = 2๐ผ2 + ๐ผ = 2(๐ผ + 1) + ๐ผ = 3๐ผ + 2
Thus we have;
๐ผ = 1๐ผ + 0
๐ผ2 = 1๐ผ + 1
๐ผ3 = 2๐ผ + 1
๐ผ4 = 3๐ผ + 2
Notice an interesting pattern emerging. The constant term and the coefficient of
๐ผ on the RHS appear to be adjacent Fibonacci numbers.
Accordingly, we have the following result.
Lemma 2.1
๐ผ๐ = ๐ผ๐น๐ + ๐น๐โ1 , where ๐ โฅ 0.
Corollary 2.3
๐ฝ๐ = ๐ฝ๐น๐ + ๐น๐โ1 , where ๐ โฅ 0.
Note:
Let ๐ข๐ = ๐ผ๐ โ ๐ฝ๐ / 5 , where ๐ โฅ 1. Then,
๐ข1 = ๐ผโ๐ฝ
5 =
5
5 = 1 and
๐ข2 = ๐ผ2โ๐ฝ2
5 =
๐ผ+๐ฝ (๐ผโ๐ฝ)
5 = 1
Suppose ๐ โฅ 3. Then,
๐ข๐โ1 + ๐ข๐โ2 = ๐ผ๐โ1โ ๐ฝ๐โ1
5 +
๐ผ๐โ2โ ๐ฝ๐โ2
5
= ๐ผ๐โ2 ๐ผ+1 โ๐ฝ๐โ2 ๐ฝ+1
5
= ๐ผ๐โ2๐ผ2โ ๐ฝ๐โ2๐ฝ2
5
= ๐ผ๐โ ๐ฝ๐
5
= ๐ข๐
Thus ๐ข๐ satisfies the Fibonacci recurrence relation and the two initial conditions.
This gives us an explicit formula for ๐น๐ : ๐น๐ = ๐ข๐
Theorem 2.6
Let ๐ผ be the positive root of the quadratic equation ๐ฅ2 โ ๐ฅ โ 1 = 0 and ๐ฝ its
negative root. Then
๐น๐ = ๐ผ๐โ๐ฝ๐
๐ผโ๐ฝ , where ๐ โฅ 1
This explicit formula for ๐น๐ is called Binetโs formula, after the French
mathematician Jacques-Phillipe-Marie Binet, who discovered it in 1843.
Corollary 2.4 (Lucas, 1876)
๐น๐+12 + ๐น๐
2 = ๐น2๐+1 (2.11)
๐น๐+12 โ ๐น๐โ1
2 = ๐น2๐ (2.12)
For example,
๐น92 + ๐น8
2 = 342 + 212 = 1156 + 441 = 1597 = ๐น17
๐น112 โ ๐น9
2 = 892 โ 342 = 7921โ1156 = 6765 = ๐น20
Corresponding to Binetโs formula for ๐น๐ , there is one for ๐ฟ๐ also.
Theorem 2.7
Let ๐ โฅ 1. Then ๐ฟ๐ = ๐ผ๐ + ๐ฝ๐
Corollary 2.5
๐น2๐ = ๐น๐๐ฟ๐ (2.13)
๐น๐โ1 + ๐น๐+1 = ๐ฟ๐ (2.14)
๐น๐+2 โ ๐น๐โ2 = ๐ฟ๐ (2.15)
๐ฟ๐โ1 + ๐ฟ๐+1 = 5๐น๐ (2.16)
For example,
๐น22 = 17711 = 89 ยท 199 = ๐น11๐ฟ11
๐น15 + ๐น17 = 610 + 1597 = 2207 = ๐ฟ16
๐น15 โ ๐น11 = 610 โ 89 = 521 = ๐ฟ13
๐ฟ12 + ๐ฟ14 = 322 + 843 = 1165 = 5 ยท 233 = 5 ยท ๐น13
Identity (2.13) implies that when ๐ โฅ 3, every Fibonacci number
๐น2๐ with an even subscript has nontrivial factors. According to identity (2.14), the
sum of any two Fibonacci numbers that are two units away is a Lucas number.
Likewise, by identity (2.15), the difference of any two Fibonacci numbers that lie
four units away is also a Lucas number.
Identity (2.13) has an interesting by-product.
Let 2๐ = 2๐ , where ๐ โฅ 1. Then,
๐น2๐ = ๐ฟ2๐โ1 ๐น2๐โ1
= ๐ฟ2๐โ1 (๐ฟ2๐โ2 ๐น2๐โ2 )
= ๐ฟ2๐โ1 ๐ฟ2๐โ2 ๐น2๐โ2
= ๐ฟ2๐โ1 ๐ฟ2๐โ2 (๐ฟ2๐โ3 ๐น2๐โ3 )
= ๐ฟ2๐โ1 ๐ฟ2๐โ2 ๐ฟ2๐โ3 ๐น2๐โ3
Continuing like this we get,
๐น2๐ = ๐ฟ2๐โ1 ๐ฟ2๐โ2 โฆโฆโฆ๐ฟ8 ๐ฟ4 ๐ฟ2 ๐ฟ1
For example,
๐น16 = ๐ฟ8๐ฟ4๐ฟ2๐ฟ1 = 47 ยท 7 ยท 3 ยท 1 = 987
Theorem 2.8
A positive integer ๐ is a Fibonacci number if and only if 5๐2 ยฑ 4 is a perfect
square.
Proof:
We have,
(โ1)๐ + ๐น๐2 = ๐น๐+1๐น๐โ1 [Cassiniโs Formula]
and ๐ฟ๐ = ๐น๐+1 + ๐น๐โ1
โด ๐ฟ๐2 โ 4 โ1 ๐ + ๐น๐
2 = ๐น๐+1 + ๐น๐โ1 2 โ 4๐น๐+1๐น๐โ1
= (๐น๐+1 โ ๐น๐โ1)2
= ๐น๐2
๐ฟ๐2 = 5๐น๐
2 +4(โ1)๐
Thus if ๐ is a Fibonacci number, then 5๐2 ยฑ 4 is a perfect square.
Conversely, let 5๐2 ยฑ 4 be a perfect square ๐2 . Then,
๐2 โ 5๐2 = ยฑ4
๐+๐ 5
2.๐โ๐ 5
2 = ยฑ1
Since ๐ and ๐ have the same parity (both odd or both even), both
(๐ + ๐ 5)/2 and (๐โ ๐ 5)/2 are integers in the extension field ๐( 5) =
{ ๐ฅ + ๐ฆ 5|๐ฅ,๐ฆ โ ๐}, where ๐ denotes the set of rational numbers. Since their
product is ยฑ1, they must be units in the field. But the only integral units in ๐( 5)
are of the form ยฑ๐ผยฑ๐ . Then,
๐+๐ 5
2 = ๐ผ๐ =
1
2 [(๐ผ๐ + ๐ฝ๐ ) + (๐ผ๐ โ ๐ฝ๐) ]
= ๐ฟ๐+๐น๐ 5
2
Thus ๐ = ๐น๐ , a Fibonacci number.
NUMBER OF DIGITS IN ๐ญ๐ AND ๐ณ๐
Binetโs formula can be successfully employed to predetermine the number of
digits in ๐น๐ and ๐ฟ๐ . We can show this by writing ๐น๐ as ๐น๐ = ๐ผ๐
5 [1 โ
๐ฝ
๐ผ ๐
]
Since |๐ฝ| < |๐ผ| , ๐ฝ ๐ผ ๐ โ 0 as ๐ โ โ. Therefore, when ๐ is sufficiently large,
๐น๐ โ ๐ผ๐
5
log ๐น๐ โ ๐ log ๐ผ โ (log 5)/2
Number of digits in ๐น๐ = 1 + characteristic of log ๐น๐ = log๐น๐
= ๐ log๐ผ โ (log 5 )/2
= ๐ log( 1 + 5 ) โ log 2 โ (log 5 )/2
For example,
The number of digits in ๐น25 is given by,
25 log 1 + 5 โ log 2 โ log 5 /2 = 4.875206004 = 5
Note that F25 = 75025 , i.e, it exactly have 5 digits which establishes the
result.
Since ๐ฟ๐ = ๐ผ๐ + ๐ฝ๐ , it follows that when ๐ is sufficiently large, ๐ฟ๐ โ ฮฑn, so that
log ๐ฟ๐ โ ๐ log ๐ผ . Thus the number of digits in ๐ฟ๐ is given by
log๐ฟ๐ = ๐ log๐ผ = ๐ [log 1 + 5 โ log 2]
For example,
The number of digits in ๐ฟ28 is given by,
28 log 1 + 5 โ log 2 = 5.851653927 = 6
Note that ๐ฟ28 = 710647, i.e, it exactly have 6 digits which establishes the result.
Theorem 2.9
A positive integer ๐ is a Lucas number if and only if 5๐2 ยฑ 20 is a
perfect square.
Proof:
Let ๐ = ๐ฟ2๐+1. Then
5๐2 + 20 = 5(๐ผ2๐+1 + ๐ฝ2๐+1)2 + 20
= 5[๐ผ4๐+2 + ๐ฝ4๐+2 + 2 ๐ผ๐ฝ)2๐+1 + 20
= 5[๐ผ4๐+2 + ๐ฝ4๐+2 โ 2(๐ผ๐ฝ)2๐+1]
= 5(๐ผ2๐+1 โ ๐ฝ2๐+1)2
= 5( 5๐น2๐+1)2 = 25๐น2๐+1 2
On the otherhand, let ๐ = ๐ฟ2๐ . Then
5๐2 โ 20 = 5(๐ผ2๐ + ๐ฝ2๐)2 โ 20 = 5[๐ผ4๐ + ๐ฝ4๐ + 2 ๐ผ๐ฝ)2๐ โ 20
= 5[๐ผ4๐ + ๐ฝ4๐ โ 2 ๐ผ๐ฝ)2๐ = 25๐น2๐ 2
Thus, if ๐ is a Lucas number, then 5๐2 ยฑ 20 is a perfect square.
Because the proof of the converse is a bit complicated, we omit it.
For example,
Let ๐ = 1364 = ๐ฟ15 . Then 5๐2 + 20 = 5 ยท 13642 + 20 = 9302500 = 30502, a
perfect square.
Let ๐ = 322 = ๐ฟ12 . Then 5๐2 โ 20 = 5 ยท 3222 โ 20 = 518400 = 7202, a
perfect square.
With Binet's formulas at hand, we can extend the definitions of ๐น๐ and ๐ฟ๐ to
negative subscripts also. If we apply the Fibonacci recurrence relation to the
negative side, we get
. . . ๐นโ4 ๐นโ3 ๐นโ2 ๐นโ1 ๐น0 ๐น1 ๐น2 ๐น3 ๐น4 . . . . . . โ3 2 โ 1 1 0 1 1 2 3 . . .
So, it appears that ๐นโ๐ = (โ1)๐+1๐น๐ ,๐ โฅ 1. To prove this, assume Binet's formula holds for negative exponents
๐นโ๐ = ๐ผโ๐โ ๐ฝโ๐
5 =
(โ๐ฝ)๐โ (โ๐ผ)๐
5 since ๐ผ๐ฝ = โ1
= (โ1)๐ (๐ฝ๐โ ๐ผ๐ )
5 =
(โ1)๐+1 (๐ผ๐โ ๐ฝ๐ )
5
= (โ1)๐+1๐น๐ (2.18)
Likewise,
๐ฟโ๐ = (โ1)๐ ๐ฟ๐ (2.19)
Thus, ๐นโ๐ = ๐น๐ if and only if ๐ is odd, and ๐ฟโ๐ = ๐ฟ๐ if and only if ๐ is even.
A formula for ๐ผโ๐ can now be derived easily.
Since ๐ผ๐ = ๐ผ ๐น๐ + ๐น๐โ1
(Lemma 2.1), it follows that
๐ผโ๐ = ๐ผ ๐นโ๐ + ๐นโ๐โ1
= ๐ผ (โ1)๐+1 ๐น๐ + (โ1)๐+2 ๐น๐+1
= (โ1)๐+1 (๐ผ ๐น๐ โ ๐น๐+1)
= ๐ผ๐น๐ โ ๐น๐+1 if ๐ is odd ๐น๐+1 โ ๐ผ ๐น๐ otherwise
(2.20)
For example,
ฮฑโ12 = F11 โ ฮฑF12 = 89 โ 144ฮฑ
Formula 2.20 can also be established by Principle of Mathematical Induction or by
showing that ๐ผ๐ ๐ผ๐น๐ โ ๐น๐+1 = โ1 ๐+1, using Binet's formula.
Likewise,
๐ฝโ๐ = ๐ฝ๐น๐ โ ๐น๐+1 if ๐ is odd๐น๐+1 โ ๐ฝ๐น๐ otherwise
(2.21)
Notice two intriguing patterns that emerge from ๐ผโ๐ :
ฮฑโ1 = 1 ยท ฮฑ โ 1
ฮฑโ2 = 2 โ 1 ยท ๐ผ
ฮฑโ3 = 2 ยท ฮฑ โ 3
ฮฑโ4 = 5 โ 3 ยท ฮฑ
ฮฑโ5 = 5 ยท ฮฑ โ 8
โฎ
They are indicated by the two crisscrossing arrows: The absolute values of the
coefficients of ๐ผ are consecutive Fibonacci numbers, and so are the absolute values
of the various constants.
The summation Formulas (2.1) through (2.3) are a special case of the generalized
summation formula, given in the next theorem. In addition, the theorem yields an
array of fascinating formulas as by-products. Its proof is a consequence of Binet's
formulas and the geometric summation formula
๐๐๐โ1
๐=0
=๐๐ โ 1
๐ โ 1 where ๐ โ 1
Theorem 2.10 (Koshy, 1998)
Let ๐ โฅ 1 and ๐ any integer. Then
๐น๐๐+๐
๐
๐=0
=
๐น๐๐+๐+๐ โ โ1 ๐ ๐น๐๐+๐ โ ๐น๐ โ โ1 ๐ ๐น๐โ๐
๐ฟ๐ โ โ1 ๐ โ 1 if ๐ < ๐
๐น๐๐+๐+๐ โ โ1 ๐ ๐น๐๐+๐ โ ๐น๐ + โ1 ๐ ๐น๐โ๐
๐ฟ๐ โ โ1 ๐ โ 1 otherwise
(2.22)
Proof:
๐น๐๐+๐ = ๐ผ๐๐+๐ โ ๐ฝ๐๐+๐
5
๐
๐=0
๐
๐=0
= 1
5 ๐ผ๐ ๐ผ๐๐ โ ๐ฝ๐ ๐ฝ๐๐
=1
5 ๐ผ๐ .
๐ผ๐๐+๐ โ 1
๐ผ๐ โ 1โ ๐ฝ๐ .
๐ฝ๐๐+๐ โ 1
๐ฝ๐ โ 1
= ๐ผ๐๐ +๐+๐ โ ๐ผ ๐ ๐ฝ๐โ 1 โ ๐ฝ๐๐ +๐+๐ โ ๐ฝ ๐ ๐ผ๐ โ 1
5 ๐ผ๐ฝ ๐ โ ๐ผ๐+๐ฝ๐ + 1
= โ๐น๐๐ +๐+๐ + (โ1)๐ ๐น๐๐ +๐ + ๐น๐+ (๐ผ๐๐ฝ ๐ โ ๐ผ ๐๐ฝ๐)/ 5
(โ1)๐ โ ๐ฟ๐+ 1
But ๐ผ๐๐ฝ๐ โ ๐ผ๐๐ฝ๐ = ๐ผ๐ฝ ๐ ๐ผ๐โ๐ โ ๐ฝ๐โ๐ if ๐ < ๐
๐ผ๐ฝ ๐ ๐ฝ๐โ๐ โ ๐ผ๐โ๐ otherwise
= โ1 ๐ 5๐น๐โ๐ if ๐ < ๐
โ1 ๐+1 5๐น๐โ๐ otherwise
โด ๐น๐๐+๐ =
๐น๐๐+๐+๐ โ โ1 ๐๐น๐๐+๐ โ ๐น๐ โ โ1 ๐๐น๐โ๐
๐ฟ๐ โ โ1 ๐ โ 1 if ๐ < ๐
๐น๐๐+๐+๐ โ โ1 ๐๐น๐๐+๐ โ ๐น๐ โ โ1 ๐๐น๐โ๐
๐ฟ๐ โ โ1 ๐ โ 1 otherwise
๐
๐=0
Letting ๐ = 0 in this formula yields the following result.
Corollary 2.6 (Koshy, 1998)
๐น๐๐ = ๐น๐๐+๐ โ (โ1)๐ ๐น๐๐ โ ๐น๐
๐ฟ๐ โ (โ1)๐ โ 1
๐
๐=1
(2.23)
CHAPTER - 3
DIVISIBILITY PROPERTIES
Theorem 3.1
๐น๐ |๐น๐๐
Proof:
We can prove this theorem by applying the Principle of Mathematical
Induction.
The given statement is clearly true when ๐ = 1.
Now assume it is true for all integers 1 through ๐, where ๐ โฅ 1.
i.e. ๐น๐ |๐น๐๐ for every ๐, where 1 โค ๐ โค ๐.
To show that ๐น๐ |๐น๐ ๐+1 , we use the identity: ๐น๐+๐ = ๐น๐โ1๐น๐ + ๐น๐๐น๐ +1
โด ๐น๐ (๐+1) = ๐น๐๐ +๐ = ๐น๐๐โ1๐น๐ + ๐น๐๐ ๐น๐+1
Since ๐น๐ |๐น๐๐ , by the induction hypothesis, it follows that ๐น๐ |๐น๐ ๐+1 .
Thus by the strong version of the Principle of Mathematical Induction,
the result is true for all integers ๐ โฅ 1.
For example,
๐น7 = 13, and ๐น28 = 317811. Since 7|28, it follows by the theorem that 13|317811.
Particularly,
๐น3 ,๐น6 ,๐น9 โฆโฆโฆ are all divisible by ๐น3
๐น4 ,๐น8 ,๐น12 โฆโฆโฆ are all divisible by ๐น4
๐น5 ,๐น10 ,๐น15 โฆโฆโฆ are all divisible by ๐น5
Theorem 3.2
If ๐น๐ |๐น๐ , then ๐|๐.
Proof:
By the division algorithm, ๐ = ๐๐ + ๐, where 0 โค ๐ < ๐. Suppose ๐น๐ |๐น๐ .
Then by theorem 1.2 and by the identity ๐น๐ = ๐น๐โ๐+1๐น๐ + ๐น๐โ๐๐น๐โ1, we get
๐น๐ |๐น๐โ๐๐น๐โ1. But ๐น๐ ,๐น๐โ1 = 1, so ๐น๐ |๐น๐โ๐ .
Similarly, ๐น๐ |๐น๐โ2๐ . Continuing like this, ๐น๐ |๐น๐โ๐๐ , i.e, ๐น๐ |๐น๐ .
This is possible unless ๐ = 0.โด ๐ = ๐๐.
Thus ๐น๐ |๐น๐ implies ๐|๐.
Corollary 3.1
๐น๐ |๐น๐ if and only if ๐|๐.
Corollary 3.2
If ๐, ๐ = 1, then ๐น๐๐น๐ |๐น๐๐ .
Proof:
By theorem 3.1, ๐น๐ |๐น๐๐ and ๐น๐ |๐น๐๐ . Therefore, ๐น๐ ,๐น๐ |๐น๐๐ .
But ๐น๐ ,๐น๐ = ๐น ๐ ,๐ = ๐น1 = 1, so ๐น๐ ,๐น๐ = ๐น๐๐น๐ . Thus ๐น๐๐น๐ |๐น๐๐ .
For example,
5,6 = 1,๐น5 = 5,๐น6 = 8, and ๐น30 = 832040. we can verify that 5 ยท 8|832040;
i.e, ๐น5๐น6|๐น30 .
Lemma 3.1
(๐น๐๐โ1 ,๐น๐) = 1.
Proof:
Let ๐ = (๐น๐๐โ1,๐น๐). Then ๐|๐น๐๐โ1 and ๐|๐น๐ . Since ๐น๐ |๐น๐๐ by
Theorem 3.1, ๐|๐น๐๐ . Thus ๐|๐น๐๐โ1 and ๐|๐น๐๐ . But (๐น๐๐โ1,๐น๐๐ ) = 1,by Corollary
2.2. Therefore ๐|1, so ๐ = 1 . Thus (๐น๐๐โ1,๐น๐) = 1.
Lemma 3.2
Let ๐ = ๐๐ + ๐. Then (๐น๐ ,๐น๐) = (๐น๐ ,๐น๐ ).
Proof:
๐น๐ ,๐น๐ = ๐น๐๐+๐ , ๐น๐
= ๐น๐๐โ1๐น๐ + ๐น๐๐๐น๐+1๐น๐ , ๐น๐ by theorem (2.5)
= ๐น๐๐โ1๐น๐ , ๐น๐
= ๐น๐ ,๐น๐ by Lemma 3.1
= ๐น๐ , ๐น๐
Theorem 3.3
๐น๐ ,๐น๐ = ๐น ๐ ,๐
Proof:
Suppose ๐ โฅ ๐. Applying the Euclidean algorithm with ๐ as the dividend
and ๐ as the divisor, we get the following sequence of equations:
๐ = ๐0๐ + ๐1 0 โค ๐1 < ๐
๐ = ๐1๐1 + ๐2 0 โค ๐2 < ๐1
๐1 = ๐2๐2 + ๐3 0 โค ๐3 < ๐2
โซถ
๐๐โ2 = ๐๐โ1๐๐โ1 + ๐๐ 0 โค ๐๐ < ๐๐โ1
๐๐โ1 = ๐๐๐๐ + 0
By Lemma 3.2, ๐น๐ ,๐น๐ = ๐น๐ ,๐น๐1 = ๐น๐1
,๐น๐2 = โฏ ยทยทยท = ๐น๐๐โ1
,๐น๐๐ .
But ๐๐ |๐๐โ1, so ๐น๐๐ |๐น๐๐โ1, by Theorem 3.1. Therefore, (๐น๐๐โ1
,๐น๐๐ ) = ๐น๐๐ . Thus
(๐น๐ ,๐น๐) = ๐น๐๐ .
But, by Euclidean algorithm, ๐๐ = (๐,๐) ; therefore, (๐น๐ ,๐น๐) = ๐น(๐ ,๐).
For example,
F16 , F24 = ๐น 16,24 = ๐น8 = 21. That is, 987, 46368 = 21
Corollary 3.3
If ๐ and ๐ are relatively prime, then so are ๐น๐ and ๐น๐ .
For example,
19, 27 = 1, so F19, F27 = 4181, 196418 = 1
Corollary 3.4
If ๐น๐ |๐น๐ , then ๐|๐.
Proof:
Suppose ๐น๐ |๐น๐ . Then ๐น๐ ,๐น๐ = ๐น๐ = ๐น(๐ ,๐), by Theorem 3.3;
โด ๐ = ๐,๐ . Thus ๐ว๐.
Corollary 3.5
There are infinitely many primes.
Proof:
Suppose there is only a finite number of primes, ๐1 ,๐2 ,โฆ,and ๐๐ .
Then consider the Fibonacci numbers ๐น๐1,๐น๐2
,โฆ,and ๐น๐๐ . Clearly, they are pair
wise relatively prime.
Since there are only ๐ primes, each of these Fibonacci numbers has exactly
one prime factor, that is, each is a prime.
This is a contradiction, since ๐น19 = 4181 = 37 ยท 113.
Thus our assumption that there are only finitely many primes is false.
In other words, thus there are infinitely many primes.
A quick look at Lucas numbers shows that every third Lucas number is even,
that is, 2|๐ฟ3๐ . This is, in fact, always true.
Theorem 3.4
๐ฟ๐ |๐น๐ if and only if 2๐|๐, where ๐ โฅ 2.
For example,
12|24, so ๐ฟ6|๐น24 ; 18|46368
Theorem 3.5
๐ฟ๐ |๐ฟ๐ if and only if ๐ = 2๐ โ 1 ๐, where ๐ โฅ 2 and ๐ โฅ 1.
For example,
Let ๐ = 3 , and ๐ = 5 ยท 3 = 15. We have ๐ฟ3 = 4 and ๐ฟ15 = 1364. Clearly,
๐ฟ3|๐ฟ15 .
Theorem 3.6 (Freeman, 1967)
1. Let ๐: ๐ = ๐น๐ :๐น๐+1. Then ๐ + ๐ ๐น๐โ1 = ๐, ๐ + โ1 ๐ ๐, ๐ ,where
๐ โฅ 2.
2. Let (๐,๐) = 1 such that ๐: ๐ = ๐:๐. Let (๐ + ๐)๐น๐โ1 = [๐, ๐] +
โ1 ๐ ๐, ๐ , where ๐ โฅ 3. Then the number of solutions of the ratio ๐:๐
equals one-half the number of positive factors of ๐น๐๐น๐โ2, one of them being
๐น๐๐น๐+1.
Proof:
1. Let ๐: ๐ = ๐น๐ :๐น๐+1.
Then, since (๐น๐ ,๐น๐+1) = 1, ๐ = ๐น๐๐ , ๐ = ๐น๐+1๐, ๐, ๐ = ๐, ๐, ๐ =
๐น๐๐น๐+1๐ for some positive integer ๐.
โด ๐ + ๐ ๐น๐โ1 = ๐น๐โ1 ๐น๐ + ๐น๐+1 ๐ = ๐น๐โ1๐น๐+2๐
= ๐น๐+1 โ ๐น๐ ๐น๐+2๐ = ๐น๐+1 ๐น๐ + ๐น๐+1 ๐ โ ๐น๐๐น๐+2๐
= ๐น๐๐น๐+1๐ + ๐น๐+12 โ ๐น๐๐น๐+2 ๐
= ๐, ๐ + โ1 ๐ ๐, ๐ by Cassiniโs
rule
2. Let ๐: ๐ = ๐:๐, where (๐ ,๐) = 1 .
Then ๐ = ๐๐, ๐ = ๐๐, (๐, ๐) = ๐ and [๐, ๐] = ๐๐๐ for some positive integer ๐.
Since (๐ + ๐) ๐น๐โ1 = [๐, ๐] + โ1 ๐ (๐, ๐), we have
๐ + ๐ ๐น๐โ1 = ๐๐ + โ1 ๐
This yields
๐ =๐๐น๐โ1 โ โ1 ๐
๐ โ ๐น๐โ1
= ๐น๐โ1 +๐น๐โ1
2 โ โ1 ๐
๐ โ ๐น๐โ1
= ๐น๐โ1 +๐น๐๐น๐โ2
๐ โ ๐น๐โ1 (3.1)
If 0 < ๐ < ๐น๐โ1, then ๐ < 0; so ๐ > ๐น๐โ1.
Since ๐ is an integer, ๐ โ ๐น๐โ1|๐น๐๐น๐โ2.
Thus Eq. (3.1) yields a value of ๐ for every positive factor of ๐น๐๐น๐โ2.
But, if ๐ = ๐ด, ๐ = ๐ต is a solution of the ratio ๐:๐, then so is ๐ = ๐ต,๐ = ๐ด.
Thus the number of distinct values of the ratio ๐:๐ equals the number of
p
positive factors of ๐น๐๐น๐โ2.
In particular, let ๐ = ๐น๐+1. Then
๐ = ๐น๐โ1 +๐น๐๐น๐โ2
๐น๐+1 โ ๐น๐โ1
= ๐น๐โ1 +๐น๐๐น๐โ2
๐น๐= ๐น๐
Thus ๐:๐ = ๐น๐ :๐น๐+1 is also a value of the ratio.
Example 3.2
1. Let ๐: ๐ = ๐น11 :๐น12 = 89: 144 , so ๐ = 11. Let ๐ = 445,๐ = 720, so
๐: ๐ = 89: 144
๐, ๐ + โ1 ๐ ๐, ๐ = 64080 โ 5 = 64075 = 445 + 720 ยท 55 = ๐ + ๐ ๐น10
2. Since (๐ + ๐)๐น10 = [๐, ๐] + โ1 11 (๐, ๐), it follows that
๐ = ๐น10 + ๐น11๐น9
๐โ๐น10
= 55 +89 ยท 34
๐ โ 55= 55 +
3026
๐ โ 55
Since 3026 = 2 ยท 17 ยท 89, 3026 has eight positive factors: 1, 2, 17, 34,89, 178, 1513 and 3026. So ๐ has eight possible values: 56, 57, 72,89, 144, 233, 1568 and 3081. Consequently, the various values of ๐:๐ are
3081: 56, 1568: 57, 233: 72, 144: 89, 89: 144, 72: 233, 57: 1568 and 56: 3081. Since one-half of them are duplicates, the four distinct values of
๐:๐ are 89: 144, 72: 233, 57: 1568 and 56: 3081, keeping the numerator to
be smaller. Notice that one of the ratios is 89: 144 = ๐น11 :๐น12, as expected.
Lemma 3.3
๐น2๐โ1 = ๐น๐+1๐ฟ๐+2 โ ๐ฟ๐๐ฟ๐+1 , ๐ โฅ 2.
Theorem 3.7
1. Let ๐: ๐ = ๐ฟ๐ : ๐ฟ๐+1. Then ๐ + ๐ ๐น๐+1 = ๐, ๐ + ๐, ๐ ๐น2๐โ1, ๐ โฅ 2.
2. Let ๐: ๐ = ๐น๐โ2:๐น๐โ1. Then ๐ + ๐ ๐น๐+1 = ๐, ๐ + ๐, ๐ ๐น2๐โ1, ๐ โฅ 3.
3. Let (๐,๐) = 1 such that ๐: ๐ = ๐:๐. If ๐ + ๐ ๐น๐+1 = ๐, ๐ + ๐, ๐ ๐น2๐โ1
where ๐ โฅ 2, then the ratios ๐:๐ are determined by the positive factors of
๐น๐+12 โ ๐น2๐โ1, one of them being ๐ฟ๐ : ๐ฟ๐+1. For ๐ โฅ 3, ๐น๐โ2:๐น๐โ1 is also a
solution.
Proof:
1. Let ๐: ๐ = ๐ฟ๐ : ๐ฟ๐+1. Since ๐ฟ๐ , ๐ฟ๐+1 = 1, ๐ = ๐๐ฟ๐ , ๐ = ๐๐ฟ๐+1, ๐, ๐ =
๐, and ๐, ๐ = ๐ฟ๐๐ฟ๐+1๐ for some positive integer ๐. Then
(๐ + ๐)๐น๐+1 = (๐ฟ๐ + ๐ฟ๐+1)๐๐น๐+1 = ๐น๐+1๐ฟ๐+2๐
= (๐น2๐โ1 + ๐ฟ๐๐ฟ๐+1)๐
= [๐, ๐] + (๐, ๐)๐น2๐โ1
as desired.
2. Suppose ๐ โถ ๐ = ๐น๐โ2:๐น๐โ1. Then = ๐๐น๐โ2, ๐ = ๐๐น๐โ1, (๐ , ๐) = ๐ , and
[๐, ๐] = ๐น๐โ1๐น๐โ2๐ for some positive integer ๐. Then
(๐, ๐)๐น๐+1 = (๐น๐โ2 + ๐น๐โ1)๐๐น๐+1 = ๐น๐๐น๐+1๐
= ๐น2๐โ1 + ๐น๐โ1๐น๐โ2 ๐
Since ๐น2๐โ1 = ๐น๐๐น๐+1 โ ๐น๐โ2๐น๐โ1
= [ ๐, ๐ ] + ( ๐ , ๐ ) ๐น2๐โ1
again as desired.
3. Let ๐ โถ ๐ = ๐ โถ ๐, where ๐ ,๐ = 1. As before, ๐ = ๐๐ , ๐ = ๐๐, ๐ , ๐ = ๐, and [ ๐ , ๐ ] = ๐๐๐ for some positive integer ๐.
Since ๐ + ๐ ๐น๐+1 = ๐, ๐ + ๐ , ๐ ๐น2๐โ1
๐ + ๐ ๐น๐+1 = ๐๐ + ๐น2๐โ1
๐ =๐๐น๐+1 โ ๐น2๐โ1
๐ โ ๐น๐+1 (3.2)
= ๐น๐+1 + ๐น๐+1
2 โ๐น2๐โ1
๐โ๐น๐โ1
Since ๐ and ๐ are positive integers, it follows that the ratio ๐:๐ is
determined by the positive factors of ๐น๐+12 โ ๐น2๐โ1. d
In particular, let ๐ = ๐น๐+1. Then by Lemma 3.3,
๐ = ๐น๐+1 + ๐น๐+1
2 โ๐น๐+1๐ฟ๐+2+๐ฟ๐๐ฟ๐+1
๐ฟ๐+1โ๐น๐+1
= ๐น๐+1 ๐ฟ๐+1โ๐ฟ๐+2 +๐ฟ๐๐ฟ๐+1
๐ฟ๐+1โ ๐น๐+1
= ๐ฟ๐๐ฟ๐+1โ๐ฟ๐๐น๐+1
๐ฟ๐+1โ๐น๐+1 = ๐ฟ๐
Thus ๐ฟ๐ : ๐ฟ๐+1 is a solution of the ratio ๐:๐. ( By symmetry, ๐ฟ๐+1: ๐ฟ๐ is also
a solution).
Unlike Theorem 3.7, not all solutions are obtained by considering the case
๐ > ๐น๐+1.. For instance, let ๐ = ๐น๐โ1.Then by Eq.(3.2).
๐ =๐น๐โ1๐น๐+1 โ ๐น2๐โ1
๐น๐โ1 โ ๐น๐+1
= ๐น๐โ1๐น๐+1โ ๐น๐๐น๐+1โ ๐น๐โ2๐น๐โ1
โ๐น๐
=โ๐น๐+1 ๐น๐โ1โ ๐น๐ + ๐น๐โ2๐น๐โ1
๐น๐
=โ๐น๐โ2๐น๐+1+ ๐น๐โ2๐น๐โ1
๐น๐
= = ๐น๐โ2(๐น๐โ1โ๐น๐+1)
๐น๐ = ๐น๐โ2
Thus ๐น๐โ2:๐น๐โ1 is also a solution of the ratio.
Example 3.3.
Let ๐ = 11. We have ๐น๐+1 = ๐น12 = 144 and ๐น2๐โ1 = ๐น21 = 10946.
1. Let ๐: ๐ = ๐ฟ๐ : ๐ฟ๐+1 = ๐ฟ11 : ๐ฟ12 = 199: 322. Let ๐ = 597 and ๐ = 966.
Then
๐, ๐ + ๐, ๐ ๐น2๐โ1 = 597, 966 + 597, 966 ยท 10946
= 192234 + 3 ยท 10946 = 225072
= 597 + 966 ยท 144
= (๐ + ๐)๐น๐+1
2. Let ๐: ๐ = ๐น๐โ2:๐น๐โ1 = ๐น9:๐น10 = 34: 55. Let ๐ = 272 and ๐ = 440.
Then ๐, ๐ + ๐, ๐ ๐น2๐โ1 = 272 ,440 + 8 ยท 10946
= 102528 = 272 + 440 ยท 144
= ๐ + ๐ ๐น๐+1
3. Let ๐: ๐ = 208: 240 = 13: 15, where ๐:๐ = 13: 15 and 15, 17 = 1.
Then ๐ = ๐น๐+1 + ๐น๐+1
2 โ๐น2๐โ1
๐โ๐น๐+1
= 144 + 1442โ10,946
๐โ144
= 144 + 9790
๐โ144
Since 9790 = 2 ยท 5 ยท 11 ยท 89, 9790 has 16 positive factors: 1, 2, 5, 10, 11,
22, 55, 89, 110, 178, 445, 890, 979, 1958, 4895 and 9790.The
corresponding ratios are 145: 9934, 146: 5039, 149: 2102, 154: 1123,
155: 1034, 166: 589, 199: 322, 233: 254, 254: 233, 322: 199, 589: 166,
1034: 155, 1123: 154, 2102: 149, 5039: 146 and 9934: 145. These yields 8
distinct ratios ๐:๐ with (๐, ๐) = 1,namely, 145:9934, 146:5039, 149:2102,
154:1123, 155:1034, 166:589, 199:322 and 233:254. Notice that 34: 55 is
also a solution. Among these ratios we find ๐ฟ11 : ๐ฟ12 = 199: 322 and
๐น9:๐น10 = 34: 55 as expected.
AN ALTERNATE FIBONACCI SEQUENCE
In 1971, Underwood Dudley and Bessie Tucker of DePauw University in Indiana
investigated a slightly altered Fibonacci sequence, defined by ๐บ๐ = ๐น๐ + โ1 ๐ ,
where ๐ โฅ 1. They made an interesting observation ,as table 2.1 shows : The
1st,3
rd,5
th,โฆentries (see the circled numbers) in the (๐บ๐ ,๐บ๐+1)-row are the 2
nd , 4
th,
6th
,โฆ. Fibonacci numbers; and the 2nd
, 4th
, 6th
,โฆ.. entries are the 3rd
, 5th , 7
th,โฆ..
Lucas numbers.
TABLE 3.1.
To establish these two results, we need the following theorem.
Theorem 3.8 (Dudley and Tucker, 1971)
(1) ๐น4๐ + 1 = ๐น2๐โ1๐ฟ2๐+1 (2) ๐น4๐ โ 1 = ๐น2๐+1๐ฟ2๐โ1
(3) ๐น4๐+1 + 1 = ๐น2๐+1๐ฟ2๐ (4) ๐น4๐+1 โ 1 = ๐น2๐๐ฟ2๐+1
(5) ๐น4๐+2 + 1 = ๐น2๐+2๐ฟ2๐ (6) ๐น4๐+2 โ 1 = ๐น2๐๐ฟ2๐+2
(7) ๐น4๐+3 + 1 = ๐น2๐+1๐ฟ2๐+2 (8) ๐น4๐+3 โ 1 = ๐น2๐+2๐ฟ2๐+1
Proof:
The proof requires the following identities:
๐น๐+๐ + ๐น๐โ๐ = ๐น๐๐ฟ๐ if ๐ is odd๐น๐๐ฟ๐ otherwise
๐น๐+๐ โ ๐น๐โ๐ = ๐น๐๐ฟ๐ if ๐ is odd ๐น๐๐ฟ๐ otherwise
Then
๐น4๐ + 1 = ๐น4๐ + ๐น2 = ๐น 2๐+1 + 2๐โ1 + ๐น 2๐+1 โ 2๐โ1
= ๐น2๐โ1๐ฟ2๐+1
and
๐น4๐+1 + 1 = ๐น4๐+1 + ๐น1 = ๐น 2๐+1 +2๐ + ๐น 2๐+1 โ2๐
= ๐น2๐+1๐ฟ2๐
The other formulas can be established similarly.
The following corollary, observed in 1971 by Hoggatt, follows easily from this
theorem.
Corollary 3.6
(1) ๐น4๐+1 + 1, ๐น4๐+2 + 1 = ๐ฟ2๐ (2) ๐น4๐+1 + 1,๐น4๐+3 + 1 = ๐น2๐+1
(3) ๐น4๐+1 โ 1, ๐น4๐+2 โ 1 = ๐น2๐ (4) ๐น4๐+1 โ 1,๐น4๐+3 โ 1 = ๐ฟ2๐+1
(5) ๐น4๐โ1 โ 1, ๐น4๐+1 + 1 = ๐น2๐ (6) ๐น4๐โ1 + 1,๐น4๐+1 + 1 = ๐ฟ2๐
(7) ๐น4๐+3 + 1, ๐น4๐ โ 1 = ๐น2๐+1 (8) ๐น4๐+3 + 1,๐น4๐+2 โ 1 = ๐น2๐
(9) ๐น4๐+4 โ 1,๐น4๐+3 โ 1 = ๐ฟ2๐+1
Although it is not yet known whether or not the Fibonacci sequence contains
infinitely many primes, this theorem establishes their finiteness in the sequences
๐น๐ + 1 and ๐น๐ โ 1 , as the next corollary shows.
Corollary 3.7
๐น๐ + 1 is composite if ๐ โฅ 4, and ๐น๐ โ 1 is composite if ๐ โฅ 7.
Proof:
When ๐ = 1, ๐น4๐+ 1 = 4 is composite. When ๐ โฅ 2, it follows from Theorem 2.9
that ๐น4๐+1 + 1, ๐น4๐+2 + 1, and ๐น4๐+3 + 1 have nontrivial factors. Thus ๐น๐ + 1 is
composite if ๐ โฅ 4. Likewise, ๐น๐ โ 1 is composite if ๐ โฅ 7.
Notice that ๐น๐ + 1 is a prime if ๐ < 4 and ๐น๐ โ 1 is a prime if ๐ < 7.
Corollary 3.8
๐บ4๐ ,๐บ4๐+1 = ๐ฟ2๐+1 , ๐บ4๐+1,๐บ4๐+3 = ๐ฟ2๐+1, and ๐บ4๐+2,๐บ4๐+3 = ๐น2๐+2
where ๐ โฅ 1
Proof:
By theorem 3.9,
๐บ4๐ ,๐บ4๐+1 = ๐น4๐+1 + 1,๐น4๐+1 โ 1
= ๐น2๐โ1๐ฟ2๐+1 ,๐น2๐๐ฟ2๐+1
= ๐ฟ2๐+1 ๐น2๐โ1,๐น2๐
= ๐ฟ2๐+1
Similarly, we can prove the other two parts.
Corollary 3.9
Let ๐ป๐ = ๐น๐ โ โ1 ๐ . Then ๐ป4๐ ,๐ป4๐+1 = ๐น2๐+1 , ๐ป4๐+1,๐ป4๐+3 = ๐น2๐+1 and
๐ป4๐+2,๐ป4๐+3 = ๐ฟ2๐+2, where ๐ โฅ 1.
CHAPTER โ 4
GENERALIZATION
We can study properties common to Fibonacci and Lucas numbers by
investigating a number sequence that satisfies the Fibonacci recurrence relation,
but with arbitrary initial conditions.
GENERALIZED FIBONACCI NUMBERS
Consider the sequence ๐บ๐ , ๐บ1 = a, ๐บ๐ = b, and ๐บ๐ = ๐บ๐โ1 + ๐บ๐โ2, ๐ โฅ 3. The
ensuing sequence
๐, ๐, ๐ + ๐,๐ + 2๐, 2๐ + 3๐, 3๐ + 5๐, . ..
is called the generalized Fibonacci sequence (GFS).
Take a close look at the coefficients of ๐ and ๐ in the various terms of this
sequence. They follow an interesting pattern: The coefficients of ๐ and ๐ are
Fibonacci numbers. In fact, we can pinpoint these two Fibonacci coefficients, as
the following theorem shows.
Theorem 4.1
Let ๐บ๐ denote the nth term of the GFS. Then ๐บ๐ = ๐๐น๐โ2 + ๐๐น๐โ1, ๐ โฅ 3.
Proof:
Since ๐บ3 = ๐ + ๐ = ๐๐น1 + ๐๐น2 , the statement is true when ๐ = 3.
Let k be an arbitrary integer โฅ 3. Assume the given statement is true for all
integers ๐, where 3 โค ๐ โค ๐: ๐บ๐ = ๐๐น๐โ2 + ๐๐น๐โ1. Then:
๐บ๐+1 = ๐บ๐ + ๐บ๐โ1
= ๐๐น๐โ2 + ๐๐น๐โ1 + ๐๐น๐โ3 + ๐๐น๐โ2
= ๐ ๐น๐โ2 + ๐น๐โ3 + ๐ ๐น๐โ1 + ๐๐น๐โ2
= ๐๐น๐โ1 + ๐๐น๐
Thus, by the principle of mathematical induction the formula holds for every
integer ๐ โฅ 3.
Notice that this theorem is in fact true for all ๐ โฅ 1.
Theorem 4.2
๐บ๐+๐
๐
๐=1
= ๐บ๐+๐+2 โ ๐บ๐+2
Proof:
By Theorem 4.1,
๐บ๐+๐
๐
๐=1
= ๐ ๐น๐+๐โ2
๐
๐=1
+ ๐ ๐น๐+๐โ1
๐
๐=1
= ๐ ๐น๐+๐ โ ๐น๐ + ๐ ๐น๐+๐+1 โ ๐น๐+1
= ๐๐น๐+๐ + ๐๐น๐+๐+1 โ ๐๐น๐ + ๐๐น๐+1
= ๐บ๐+๐+2 โ ๐บ๐+2
Theorem 4.3 (Koshy, 1998)
๐บ๐๐บ๐+1
๐
๐=1
= ๐2 ๐น๐โ22 โ ๐ฃ + ๐2 ๐น๐โ1
2 โ ๐ฃ + 1
+ ๐๐ ๐ฟ2๐โ1 + 5๐น๐โ1๐น๐ + ๐ฃ + 1 /5
where ๐ฃ = 1 if ๐ is odd 0 otherwise
Theorem 4.4 (Binet's formula).
Let ๐ = ๐ + ๐ โ ๐ ๐ฝ and ๐ = ๐ + (๐ โ ๐)๐ผ. Then
๐บ๐ =๐๐ผ๐ โ ๐๐ฝ๐
๐ผ โ ๐ฝ
Proof:
By Theorem 4.1,
๐บ๐ = ๐๐น๐โ2 + ๐๐น๐โ1
5๐บ๐ = ๐ ๐ผ๐โ2 โ ๐ฝ๐โ2 + ๐ ๐ผ๐โ1 โ ๐ฝ๐โ1
= ๐ผ๐ ๐
๐ผ2+
๐
๐ผ โ ๐ฝ๐
๐
๐ฝ2+
๐
๐ฝ
= ๐ผ๐ ๐๐ฝ2 โ ๐๐ฝ โ ๐ฝ๐ ๐๐ผ2 โ ๐๐ผ
= ๐ผ๐ ๐ + ๐ โ ๐ ๐ฝ โ ๐ฝ๐ ๐ + ๐ โ ๐ ๐ผ
โด ๐บ๐ =๐๐ผ๐ โ ๐๐ฝ๐
๐ผ โ ๐ฝ
as desired.
Notice that
๐๐ = [๐ + (๐ โ ๐)๐ฝ][๐ + (๐ โ ๐)๐ผ]
= ๐2 + (๐ โ ๐)2๐ผ๐ฝ + ๐(๐ โ ๐)(๐ผ + ๐ฝ)
= ๐2 โ (๐ โ ๐)2 + ๐(๐ โ ๐)
= ๐2 + ๐๐ โ ๐2
This constant occurs in many of the formulas for generalized Fibonacci numbers. It
is called the characteristic of the GFS. We denote it by the Greek letter ฮผ (mu):
๐ = ๐2 + ๐๐ โ ๐2
The characteristic of the Fibonacci sequence is 1, and that of the Lucas sequence is
โ5.
Theorem 4.5
๐บ๐+1๐บ๐โ1 โ ๐บ๐2 = ๐ โ1 ๐
Proof:
5 ๐บ๐+1๐บ๐โ1 โ ๐บ๐2 = ๐๐ผ๐+1 โ ๐๐ฝ๐+1 ๐๐ผ๐โ1 โ ๐๐ฝ๐โ1 โ ๐๐ผ๐ โ ๐๐ฝ๐ 2
= โ๐๐ ๐ผ๐+1๐ฝ๐โ1 + ๐ผ๐โ1๐ฝ๐+1 + 2๐๐ ๐ผ๐ฝ ๐
= โ๐ ๐ผ๐ฝ ๐โ1 ๐ผ2 + ๐ฝ2 + 2๐ ๐ผ๐ฝ ๐
= 5๐ โ1 ๐
Therefore, ๐บ๐+1๐บ๐โ1 โ ๐บ๐2 = ๐ โ1 ๐ .
In particular, ๐ฟ๐+1๐ฟ๐โ1 โ ๐ฟ๐2 = 5 โ1 ๐โ1.
Theorem 4.6
Let ๐ด๐ต๐ถ be a triangle with AC = ๐บ๐๐บ๐+3, BC=2๐บ๐+1๐บ๐+2 and AB = ๐บ2๐+3. Then
โABC is a right triangle with hypotenuse AB.
In Chapter 2, we found that the sum of any 10 consecutive Fibonacci
numbers is 11 times the seventh number in the sequence. Also, notice that the first
10 terms of the generalized Fibonacci sequence are , ๐, ๐ + ๐,๐ + 2๐, 2๐ +
3๐, 3๐ + 5๐, 5๐ + 8๐, 8๐ + 13๐, 13๐ + 21๐, and 21๐ + 34๐. Their sum is
55๐ + 88๐, which is clearly 11 times the seventh term 5๐ + 8๐. Interestingly
enough, 11 = ๐ฟ5. Thus
Gi
10
1
= ๐ฟ5 . G7
where ๐ฟ5 = (55,89 โ 1) = (๐น10 ,๐น11 โ 1)
When ๐ = 10, this sum is divisible by ๐ฟ5, as we just observed. Consequently,
let us look for a way to factor this sum. Since ๐ and ๐ are arbitrary, we look for the
common factors of ๐น๐ and ๐น๐+1 โ 1 . [Although (๐น๐ ,๐น๐+1) = 1,๐น๐ and ๐น๐+1 โ 1
need not be relatively prime.]
Table 4.1 shows a few specific values of ๐น๐ ,๐น๐+1 โ 1 , and their factorizations; we
have omitted the cases where (๐น๐ ,๐น๐+1 โ 1) = 1.
TABLE 4.1
It is apparent from the table that when n is of the form 4k + 2, (๐น๐ ,๐น๐+1 โ 1) is
a Lucas number and the various quotients are consecutive Fibonacci numbers; and
when n is of the form 4k, (๐น๐ ,๐น๐+1 โ 1) is a Fibonacci number and the various
quotients are consecutive Lucas numbers.
Next we proceed to confirm these two observations, for which we need the
following facts from Theorem 2.9:
๐น4๐+1 โ 1 = ๐ฟ2๐+1๐น2๐ and ๐น4๐+2 โ 1 = ๐ฟ2๐๐น2๐+2
Case 1. Let n be of the form 4k + 2.Then
๐บ๐
4๐+2
1
= ๐๐น4๐+2 + ๐(๐น4๐+3 โ 1)
= ๐๐ฟ2๐+1๐น2๐+1 + ๐๐ฟ2๐+1๐น2๐+2
= ๐ฟ2๐+1(๐๐น2๐+2 + ๐๐น2๐+2)
= ๐ฟ2๐+1๐บ2๐+3
Thus ๐บ๐
4๐+2
1
can be obtained by multiplying ๐บ2๐+3 with ๐ฟ2๐+1
In particular, ๐บ๐
10
1
= ๐ฟ5 .๐บ7 = 11 . ๐บ7
as observed earlier. This is an interesting case, since multiplication by 11 is
remarkably easy. Likewise,
we can compute ๐บ๐
30
1
by multiplying ๐บ17 with ๐ฟ15 = 1364
Case 2. Let n be of the form 4๐. Then
๐บ๐
4๐
1
= ๐๐น4๐ + ๐ ๐น4๐+1 โ 1
= ๐๐ฟ2๐๐น2๐ + ๐๐ฟ2๐+1๐น2๐
= ๐น2๐ ๐๐ฟ2๐ + ๐๐ฟ2๐+1
= ๐น2๐ ๐ ๐น2๐โ1 + ๐น2๐+1 + ๐ ๐น2๐ + ๐น2๐+2
= ๐น2๐ ๐๐น2๐โ1 + ๐๐น2๐ + ๐๐น2๐+1 + ๐๐น2๐+2
= ๐น2๐ ๐บ2๐+1 + ๐บ2๐+3
Thus we can realize ๐บ๐
4๐
1
by multiplying the sum ๐บ2๐+1 + ๐บ2๐+3 with ๐น2๐ .
For instance, we can obtain ๐บ๐
4๐
1
by multiplying the sum ๐บ11 + ๐บ13 with 55.
REFERENCES
1. Thomas Koshy , โFibonacci and Lucas Numbers with Applicationsโ, A
Wiley-Interscience Publication
2. Apostol T.M., โIntroduction to Analytic Number Theoryโ , Springer
International Student Edition, Narosa Publishing House (1989).
3. Burton D.M. โElementary Number Theoryโ , Tata McGraw-Hill
Edition, Sixth Edition (2006).