differentiation. prince george.2013
Post on 18-Oct-2014
308 views
DESCRIPTION
Strategies for differentiating instruction to include all students. Intermediate/Secondary.TRANSCRIPT
Differentiation Prince George Intermediate/Secondary Teachers
Feb. 26, 2013 Faye Brownlie
www.slideshare.net
Differentiated Instruction …is a process to teaching and learning for students of different abiliGes in the same class.
(NCAC – NaGonal Centre on Accessing the General Curriculum)
The intent is to maximize each student’s growth and individual success by meeGng each student where he or she is...rather than expecGng students to modify themselves for the curriculum.” (Hall, 2002)
Differentiated Instruction
Content Process
Product
Learning environment
Differentiated Instruction
An approach to teaching and learning that gives students mulGple opGons:
-‐ for taking in informaGon
-‐ for making sense of ideas
-‐ for presenGng ideas
-‐ for being evaluated on their learning
Some Key Understandings: • Access to the content • Present learning goals, learning intenGons • Focus on concepts and principles • Use flexible groups • Use on-‐going assessment (assessment FOR learning)
How is this differentiation?
– MulGple opGons in – Access to the curriculum – OpportuniGes for learning – MeeGng students where they are – Content, process, product, learning environment
The teeter totter
kids
kids curriculum
Frameworks
It’s All about Thinking (English, Humanities, Social Studies) – Brownlie & Schnellert, 2009
It’s All about Thinking (Math, Science)– Brownlie, Fullerton, Schnellert, 2011
Universal Design for Learning MulGple means: -‐to tap into background knowledge, to acGvate prior knowledge, to increase engagement and moGvaGon
-‐to acquire the informaGon and knowledge to process new ideas and informaGon
-‐to express what they know.
Rose & Meyer, 2002
Backwards Design • What important ideas and enduring understandings do you want the students to know?
• What thinking strategies will students need to demonstrate these understandings?
McTighe & Wiggins, 2001
Teaching Approach that Differentiate
• Open-‐ended teaching • Strategies: connect, process, transform & personalize
• Workshop
• Choice • Inquiry learning • Literature/informaGon circles
Differentiated Instruction
How can you find the sum of:
6 + 8
36 + 48 3.6 + 4.8
Introduction to Mitosis • Whip around – what do you remember about DNA?
• QuesGoning from 3 pictures
• AnGcipaGon guide – with partner • Read to find out and provide evidence for your answer
• Sort and predict – groups of 3
• With Ken Asano, Centennial
Before Aher
cancer duplicate cell cycle daughter cells cytokinesis nucleus interphase proteins mitosis divide replicaGon replace spindle fibres funcGon for survival separate
Thermal Energy/Plate Tectonics • Sort and predict with vocab • Utube clip – resort your words as needed • Scan the text for what else you need to know • Use the words to make a concept map
• Exit slip: how will you best remember
• With Curt Dewolff, Moody Secondary
How is this differentiation?
– MulGple opGons in – Access to the curriculum – OpportuniGes for learning – MeeGng students where they are – Content, process, product, learning environment
Information Circles • Choose your inquiry quesGon or informaGon focus
• Model how to ask quesGons from an image, within the framework of the quesGon
• Fishbowl a circle conversaGon • Other students observe for ‘what works’ • Build criteria for effecGve group behaviour
Vocabulary/terms Images
Ques3ons Key ideas
The 10 Greatest Canadian Environmentalists – Discovery Series, ScholasGc
What worked?
• Eye contact • On topic – everyone said something • No interrupGons • Everyone spoke • Prepared • No physical distracGons • Direct responses – acknowledge and linked in • Laughing and then return to task • Took turns, equally • Nodding, watching as they listened
Information Circles • Select 4-‐5 different arGcles, focused on central topic or theme.
• Present arGcles and have students choose the one they wish to read.
• Present note-‐taking page. • Student fill in all boxes EXCEPT ‘key ideas’ before meeGng in the group.
• Students meet in ‘like’ groups and discuss their arGcle, deciding together on ‘key ideas’.
• Students meet in non-‐alike groups and present their informaGon from their arGcle.
Inquiry Circles on Mesopotamia • Fishbowl of inquiry circles – Read to find what’s important and/or interesGng and defend with 2 pieces of evidence -‐ “because”
• Co-‐create criteria for effecGve group • Assign students to topic groups • Students read to choose ‘the best invenGon’ • In groups, each talks by supporGng his/her opinion with evidence
• With Sue Jackson, Minnekhada
How is this differentiation?
– MulGple opGons in – Access to the curriculum – OpportuniGes for learning – MeeGng students where they are – Content, process, product, learning environment
• 10 years aher high school, graduates who had honed their teamwork skills while sGll in high school had significantly higher earnings than those who failed to do so (Science Daily 2008).
Inquiry based teaching … • Is problem or quesGon driven • Encourages collaboraGon • Makes students into explorers and discoverers
• Requires students to think • Puts teachers in nonconvenGonal roles
– Steph Harvey and Harvey Daniels, 2009
Inquiry based teaching … • Requires explicit teaching of social skills and comprehension skills
• Is open-‐ended • Is inclusive • Can permeate a day
• Is fun
What? So What? • 2 column notes
• EssenGal quesGon: – How does where you live affect how you live?
A Midsummer Night’s Dream – Introduc7on assignment
• Partner draw • Step one: Choose a partner. One partner (partner #1) will
be drawing, the other (partner #2) will be describing an image on the screen to the partner who is drawing. Partner 1 must turn their desk toward the back wall so that their back is facing the Smart Board at the front – they cannot see the picture they are about to draw. Once the picture is up, partner two will describe the image to partner 1 as (s)he draws it. Both partners should be able to see the drawing as it is being created. Once finished, students may turn around and compare their drawings to the original.
Step two: Switch partners and repeat the above process with the picture below:
Step three: “What/So What”
Have students work again with their picture partner. They need to make a two column table labeling the columns: “What” and “So What?”
In the “What” column, students will make observaGons on what they noGce about the picture. In the “So What” column, students will explain why each observaGon is important, what it might mean, significance, and so on.
What: What do you see in the image above?
So What: What might the significance of the image be?
A garden Gardens are safe – this is probably a safe place There is a mask behind the girl
Maybe this is not a safe place; Is he a stalker? Maybe this is a forbidden love? (spying?)
The girl has flowers in her hair
Maybe he picked flowers for her She might be a fairy
The man is part donkey (he has donkey ears and a hairy face)
Maybe he had a curse put on him? Is this a magical place – it reminds (me) of Narnia Magic must be involved Maybe it has to do with his artude – “ass”
The two are looking lovingly at each other
They must be in love Maybe it is a forbidden love? It is weird that she loves him because he is part donkey Maybe she is under a love curse
Class discussion following partner work:
How is this differentiation?
– MulGple opGons in – Access to the curriculum – OpportuniGes for learning – MeeGng students where they are – Content, process, product, learning environment
Erica Foote, Princess Margaret Secondary
• If students were given the opportunity (4 Gmes per semester) to show what they know in different ways, would it not only increase their interest and effort but also increase their understanding?
English 10
• 4 wriGng assignments, 4 choice assignments – PowerPoint presentaGons, drawing, poetry, collages, creaGng their own test with answer keys, presenGng their informaGon orally or using drama to represent their thinking
• 6 students • AFL strategies – Ranked exemplars with the PS – Analyzed the exemplars to co-‐create criteria – Used the criteria for their work – Ownership – with choice
2 wriGng 2 choice assignments – demonstrate your knowledge &
understanding of various literature
Not yet %/#
Approaching Mee3ng Exceeding
WriGng (essay/paragraph)
16/2 41/5 25/3 16/2
Choice 0/0 16/2 33/4 50/6
Erica’s ReflecGons
• 100% of students reported they liked the choice and wanted to do have choices again in another semester
• 91% of students felt they did beter with choice • About 50% sGll chose some form of wriGng when given a choice, but liked the choice
• Fewer complained about the non-‐choice wriGng assignments
• Fewer assignments were handed in late