diet, microbiota and the immune system: a gut feeling about type … · diet, gut microbiota and...

23
Diet, microbiota and the immune system: A gut feeling about type 1 diabetes Dr. Eliana Mariño Monash University Melbourne, Australia

Upload: dangdat

Post on 09-Feb-2019

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Diet, microbiota and the immune system: A gut

feeling about type 1 diabetes

Dr. Eliana Mariño

Monash University

Melbourne, Australia

Diet, gut microbiota and

Western lifestyle diseases

From Maslowski and Mackay Nat. Immunol 2011

Type 1 diabetes

Asthma

Food allergies

IBD

- Salt

- Articial sweetners

- Food emuldifiers

Fatty liver

Diet and Microbiota

Gut

Obesity

T1D

Kidney

Metabolic Sindrome

Cancer

The role of dietary metabolites in inflammatory diseases

Type 1 Diabetes

• Blood sugar regulation lost

• Loss of insulin production and Hyperglyceamia

• Insulin producing beta cells destroyed

• Immune attack - autoimmune disease

• Controlled with exogenous insulin

• Diabetic complications are a major issue

Images: thnx to Pete Campbell & Tom Kay SVI Melbourne

(x400) (x400)

Insulin labelling Insulin labelling - pancreas T1D subject

Epidemiology of T1D

Australia

UK USA

China

Venezuela

Diabetic Medicine Volume 23, Issue 8, pages 857-866, 26 JUN 2006 DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01925.x

Findland Sweeden

Mexico

Diet and Inflammatory Disease

Increase in diabetes and inflammatory diseases = ↑ popularity of Western-style diets • Diet (↓ fibre ↑ fat)

Developing countries diets (↑ fibre) = ↓ inflammatory disease

• Mediterranean diet = ↓ cardiovascular disease, asthma

Gut microbiota and Short-Chain Fatty Acids (SCFAs)

• SCFAs are produced by the gut microbiota from fermentation of dietary fibre

• Most common are:

• SCFAs are absorbed across the gut epithelium • They pass through the portal vein to the liver – the primary site of

metabolism

Dietary fibre acetate

butyrate propionate

bacteria

Hypothesis

Diet alters gut microbiota and reduced production of microbial SCFAs affect immune tolerance that increase

T1D susceptibility

Aim

To study the cellular and molecular mechanisms by which diet and SCFAs influence the course of autoimmune diabetes

SCFAs protect from T1D

b

Marino et al. Fig. 2

(%

)D

iabe

tes-f

ree

0 (Clear)

1 (<25%)

2 (25-50%)

3 (50-75%)

4 (>75%)

cNOD 5 week-old NOD 15 week-old NOD diabetic HAMS-fed NOD

15 week-old

HAMSA-fed NOD 15 week-old

HAMSA-fed NOD 30 week-old

x400

HAMSB-fed NOD 15 week-old

HAMSB-fed NOD 30 week-old

5 w

ks- o

ld 1

5 wks

-old

15 w

ks-o

ld 15 w

ks-old

30

wks-

old

NP HAMS HAMSA

15 w

ks-old

30

wks-

old

HAMSB

Diab

etic

0

25

50

75

100

Age (weeks)

30wk

s-old

HAMSA+B

HAMSA #, **

HAMSB, *

HAMSA+B ##, ***

HAMS, NS

NP, NS

a Hepatic portal blood Cecal contentFeces Peripheral blood

HAM

S

HA

MSA

HAM

SB

HAM

SHAM

SA

HAM

SB

HAM

S

HAMS

A

HAMS

B0

20

40

60

80

100

Ace

tate

(m

M)

****

NS

0

20

40

60

80

100

Bu

tyra

te (

mM

) ****

NS

0

2

4

6

8

Pro

pio

na

te (

mM

)

*

NS

HAM

S

HAM

SA

HAM

SB

0

20

40

60

80

Ace

tate

(m

M)

**

NS

HAM

S

HAM

SA

HAM

SB

0

20

40

60

Bu

tyra

te (

mM

)

****

NS

HAM

S

HAM

SA

HAM

SB

0

5

10

15

20

Pro

pio

na

te (

mM

) ***

NS

HAM

S

HAM

SA

HAM

SB

0

500

1000

1500

2000

Ace

tate

(mM

)

*

NS

0

50

100

150

Bu

tyra

te (

mM

)

*

NS

0

50

100

150

200

250

Pro

pio

na

te (m

M)

NS

NS

HAM

S

HA

MSA

HAM

SB

HAM

S

HAM

SA

HAM

SB

HAM

S

HAM

SA

HAM

SB

HAM

S

HAM

SA

HAM

SB

0

100

200

300

400

Ace

tate

(mM

)

*

NS

0

5

10

15

Bu

tyra

te (

mM

)

NS

**

0

5

10

15

Pro

pio

na

te (

mM

)

*

NS

HAM

SHAM

SA

HAM

SB

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

0

20

40

60

80

100

200mm 200mm 200mm 200mm

200mm 200mm 200mm 200mm

Fre

qu

ency o

f is

let score

(%

)

b

Marino et al. Fig. 2 (%

)D

iabe

tes-f

ree

0 (Clear)

1 (<25%)

2 (25-50%)

3 (50-75%)

4 (>75%)

cNOD 5 week-old NOD 15 week-old NOD diabetic HAMS-fed NOD

15 week-old

HAMSA-fed NOD 15 week-old

HAMSA-fed NOD 30 week-old

x400

HAMSB-fed NOD 15 week-old

HAMSB-fed NOD 30 week-old

5 w

ks- o

ld 1

5 wks

-old

15 w

ks-o

ld 15 w

ks-old

30

wks-

old

NP HAMS HAMSA

15 w

ks-old

30

wks-

old

HAMSB

Diab

etic

0

25

50

75

100

Age (weeks)

30wk

s-old

HAMSA+B

HAMSA #, **

HAMSB, *

HAMSA+B ##, ***

HAMS, NS

NP, NS

a Hepatic portal blood Cecal contentFeces Peripheral blood

HAM

S

HA

MSA

HAM

SB

HAM

SHAM

SA

HAM

SB

HAM

S

HAMS

A

HAMS

B0

20

40

60

80

100

Ace

tate

(m

M)

****

NS

0

20

40

60

80

100

Bu

tyra

te (

mM

) ****

NS

0

2

4

6

8

Pro

pio

na

te (

mM

)

*

NS

HAM

S

HAM

SA

HAM

SB

0

20

40

60

80

Ace

tate

(m

M)

**

NS

HAM

S

HAM

SA

HAM

SB

0

20

40

60B

uty

rate

(m

M)

****

NS

HAM

S

HAM

SA

HAM

SB

0

5

10

15

20

Pro

pio

na

te (

mM

) ***

NS

HAM

S

HAM

SA

HAM

SB

0

500

1000

1500

2000

Ace

tate

(mM

)

*

NS

0

50

100

150

Bu

tyra

te (

mM

)

*

NS

0

50

100

150

200

250P

rop

ion

ate

(mM

)NS

NS

HAM

S

HA

MSA

HAM

SB

HAM

S

HAM

SA

HAM

SB

HAM

S

HAM

SA

HAM

SB

HAM

S

HAM

SA

HAM

SB

0

100

200

300

400

Ace

tate

(mM

)

*

NS

0

5

10

15

Bu

tyra

te (

mM

)

NS

**

0

5

10

15

Pro

pio

na

te (

mM

)

*

NS

HAM

SHAM

SA

HAM

SB

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

0

20

40

60

80

100

200mm 200mm 200mm 200mm

200mm 200mm 200mm 200mm

Fre

qu

ency o

f is

let score

(%

)

HAMSA diet increase levels of acetate In plasma from NOD mice

Protective bacteria Non-protective bacteria

Acetate markedly reduces auto-reactive effector T cell numbers in NOD8.3 mice

Diet controls peripheral Treg numbers

-

Bar

asto

c

Hig

h Fat

die

t (HFD

)

Hig

h Fib

re d

iet

HFD

/HF

HFD

/Bar

asto

c0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

CD

4+

CD

25

+F

ox

P3

+ (x

10

^6

)

Spleen: C57BL/6 mice

**, P=0.0083****, P<0.0001

*, P=0.01

Marino et al. Fig. 5

% F

oxp

3+

[ga

ted

on

CD

4+

]

a

Num

be

r o

f F

oxp3

+ T

reg

cells

(x106

)

HAMS

HAMSA

HAMSB

Gata3 Gitr

Sell (CD62L)

Gata3Gitr

Sell (CD62L)

83

1 2

5

46

HAMS HAMSB g

0 0

00

0

0

f

HAMS

HAMSB

HAMSA

****,##

****

HAMSA

NP

HAMS

HAMSB

Weeks post injections

b

Dia

be

tes-f

ree

(%

)

NS

NP

NS

10

0

5

10

15

20

**

NS

HAMS

HAMSA

HAMSBNP

0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0 *** **

0 5 10 15 200

20

40

60

80

100

##

###### #### ##

c d

e

Spleen

NP

HAM

S

Nu

mbe

r o

f F

oxp3

+ T

reg

cells

(x10

3)

PLN

**

NSNS

NP

HAM

S

HAMS

A

HAMS

B

Nu

mb

er

of F

oxp

3+

Tre

g

ce

lls (

x10

3)

*NS

NS

0

20

40

60

80

0

5

10

15

HAMS

A

HAMS

B

##

HAM

S

HAM

SA

HAM

SB

0

10

20

30

40

50

% C

D4

+F

oxP

3+

/IL-1

0+

HE

LIO

S+

***

Spleen

0

20

40

60

80

HAM

S

HAM

SA

HAM

SBNP

NP

% C

D4

+F

oxP

3+

/IL-1

0+

HE

LIO

S+

PLN

NS

NS

**

NSNS

Spleen

Exp

ressio

n (

log

2E

x)

Gata3 Sell (CD62L)GitrGapdh Foxp3

0

5

10

15

0

5

10

15

0

5

10

15

0

5

10

15

##

0

5

10

15

HAMS

B

HAM

S

HAMS

A

HAMS

B

Acety

lation

at Foxp3

lo

ci (A

U) H3K9

IgG

**

Acety

lation

at

Foxp3 lo

ci (

AU

) H4 Penta

IgG

HAM

S

HAMS

A

HAMS

B

NS

0

1

2

3

4****

NS

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.310

15

20

HDAC inhibition/

epigenetic mechanisms

Foxp3

Single cell PCR

Diet (particularly acetate) changes MHC I and co-stimulatory molecules on B cells (and DCs)

Control diet

Acetate diet

Butyrate diet

Effector T cells don’t proliferate when transferred to HAMSA fed mice

NOD8.3 TCR Tg CD8+ cells transferred to NOD on different diets

autoantigen (IGRP) recognised by transgenic TCR

Pancreatic LN

Mesenteric LN

SCFAs improve barrier function

LPS in serum IL-22 (gut homeostasis) in serum

Microbiota shaped by different diets differs markedly contributes to disease

susceptibility/protection

Mice on different diets

HAMSA

HAMSB

chow

Dramtic changes in microbiota composition

High fat

Germ free Mice on the same chow diet

Chow microbiome

HAMSA shaped microbiome

HAMSB shaped microbiome

High fat shaped microbiome

Propionate

Acetate

Butyrate

Bacteroides

Lactobacillus

Allobaculum

Anaeroplasma

Unclassified

Oscillospira

Coprococcus

Eubacterium

Clostridium

Ruminococcus

Dehalobacterium

Akkermansia

Parabacteroides

Colours (phylum)

Bacteroidetes

Firmicutes

Tenericutes

Undefined

Verrucomicrobiota

Marino et al. Fig. 7

HAMSA.FT

HAMSB.FT

NP.FT

HAMS.FT

*

0

20

40

60

80

100

(%)

Dia

be

tes-f

ree

c

5 10 15 20 25 30

Age (weeks)

Unknown

B. acidifaciens Bacteroides Bacteroidaceae

Bacteroidales PorphyromonadaceaeUnknown Parabacteroides

Unknown FamilyUnknown Unknown Genus

Unknown Family Unknown Unknown Genus Clostridiales

Lactobacillaceae

Unknown Lactobacillus

Lactobacillales

Bacteroidia Bacteroidetes

Clostridia Firmicutes

Bacilli

Unknown Family

Unknown Unknown Genus Unknown order Alphaproteobacteria Proteobacteria

AnaeroplasmataceaeUnknown Anaeroplasma Anaeroplasmatales Mollicutes

Tenericutes

NP HAMSBHAMSAHAMS

a

Fe

ca

l con

cent

ratio

n (m

M)

eHAMS

HAMSA

HAMSB

Glu

tam

ate

Glu

tam

ine

Glu

tam

ate

Glu

tam

ine

Ce

cal c

once

ntra

tion

(mM

)

HAMS. FT

HAMSA. FT

HAMSB. FT

0

50

100

150

200

500

1000

1500

Port

al h

epa

tic v

ein

me

tabolit

es (uM

)

Acetate Butyrate Propionate

**

HAMSHAMSA

HAMSB

d

NS

0

50

100

150

200

250 ***

NS

b

*****

***

0

1000

2000

3000

Acetate Butyrate Propionate

Ce

cal m

eta

bo

lite

s (

mM

)

***

*

0

50

100

150

200

Glu

tam

ate

Glu

tam

ine

SCFA acetate change abundance of Bacteroidetes phyla in NOD mice associated with T1D protection

Propionate

Acetate

Butyrate

Bacteroides

Lactobacillus

Allobaculum

Anaeroplasma

Unclassified

Oscillospira

Coprococcus

Eubacterium

Clostridium

Ruminococcus

Dehalobacterium

Akkermansia

Parabacteroides

Colours (phylum)

Bacteroidetes

Firmicutes

Tenericutes

Undefined

Verrucomicrobiota

Marino et al. Fig. 7

HAMSA.FT

HAMSB.FT

NP.FT

HAMS.FT

*

0

20

40

60

80

100

(%)

Dia

be

tes-f

ree

c

5 10 15 20 25 30

Age (weeks)

Unknown

B. acidifaciens Bacteroides Bacteroidaceae

Bacteroidales PorphyromonadaceaeUnknown Parabacteroides

Unknown FamilyUnknown Unknown Genus

Unknown Family Unknown Unknown Genus Clostridiales

Lactobacillaceae

Unknown Lactobacillus

Lactobacillales

Bacteroidia Bacteroidetes

Clostridia Firmicutes

Bacilli

Unknown Family

Unknown Unknown Genus Unknown order Alphaproteobacteria Proteobacteria

AnaeroplasmataceaeUnknown Anaeroplasma Anaeroplasmatales Mollicutes

Tenericutes

NP HAMSBHAMSAHAMS

a

Fe

ca

l con

cent

ratio

n (m

M)

eHAMS

HAMSA

HAMSB

Glu

tamate

Glu

tam

ine

Glu

tamate

Glu

tam

ine

Ce

cal c

once

ntra

tion

(mM

)

HAMS. FT

HAMSA. FT

HAMSB. FT

0

50

100

150

200

500

1000

1500

Port

al h

epa

tic v

ein

me

tabolit

es (uM

)

Acetate Butyrate Propionate

**

HAMSHAMSA

HAMSB

d

NS

0

50

100

150

200

250 ***

NS

b

*****

***

0

1000

2000

3000

Acetate Butyrate Propionate

Ce

cal m

eta

bo

lite

s (

mM

)

***

*

0

50

100

150

200

Glu

tam

ate

Glu

tam

ine

• Improvements to gut homeostasis/integrity

• Effects on Treg biology

• Effects on co-stimulatory molecules on B cells/DCs

• Decreased autoimmune T effector numbers

• Changes in gut microbiota composition

Summary of mechanisms

Summary

acetate

butyrate

propionate

Omega-3 fatty acids

Cardiovascular

Neural conditions

Type 1 diabetes

Asthma

Food allergies

IBD

Fatty liver

Western lifestyle diet Hygiene? Antibiotic use? Microbiota composition

Dysbiosis Leaky gut LPS distribution

Metabolites and disease HDAC inhibition

MAP kinases

PKC

b-arrestin2 PI3K

TAK NF-kB Inhibition of inflammatory cytokines

mTOR

Ga Gg

Gb

Cell shape/ motility

Metabolite sensing by GPCRs

Inflammasome activation

Ah

R

AR

NT

• IL-22 CYP1 enzymes

Transcription factors

Tan et al Annual Review Immunol 2017

Acknowledgements

• Prof Charles Mackay

• James Richards

• Keiran McLeod

• Yu Anne Yap