device for measuring zeta potential for flotation systems
TRANSCRIPT
Development of Device for Measuring Zeta Potential Using
Sedimentation MethodSalah Uddin
Preliminary Examination, 2009
McGill University Department of Mining and Materials Engineering
Outline
Zeta potential (ZP)Origin of surface chargeElectrical double layer and ZPImportance of ZP measurement
Sedimentation potential (SP)PrincipleCell design and instrument controlResults
Single oxidesOre
Possible explanationFuture workContribution to original knowledge
Origin of surface charge
= Si
= O
= H
– Si+ + H2O ↔ – Si – OH + H+
– O- + H2O ↔ – O – H + OH-
= M
= S
– M+ + H2O ↔ – M – OH + H+
– S- + H2O ↔ – S – H + OH-
1. Surface hydration
Origin of surface charge (cont.)
2. Reaction with H+ and OH-
Silica– Si – OH + H+ ↔ – Si+ + H2O– O – H + OH- ↔ – O- + H2O
Metalsulphide
– M – OH + H+ ↔ – M+ + H2O
– S – H + OH- ↔ – S- + H2O
Electrical double layer (EDL)
Surface-----+-
Mineral Solution
Net surface charge is negative
-
+
+
+
+ +
+
+
+
+
-
--
-
Inner bound layerDiffuse layer
-+
Inner bound layerCounter ions firmly attached
Considered to be immobile
Diffuse layerCounter ions loosely bonded
Can move by external force
Electrical double layerSpatial non-uniform distributionof counter ions
Zeta potential
Zeta potential Potential at the surface of inner layer
surface
potential, mV
distance fromsurface, nm
ψo
ζ = zeta potential= surface potential
ζ
surface of inner layer
+
0
_ψo
Zeta potential and flotation
2 4 6 8 10 12
pH
ZETA
PO
TEN
T IA
L , m
V
60
40
20
0
- 20
- 40
- 60
10-4 M NaCl
10-2 M NaCl
iep ~ pH 6.5
+ + + +
_ _ _ _
surface
surface
100
80
60
40
20
00 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
FLO
TATI
ON
REC
OV
ERY
, %
pH
iep= R-SO3
-
R-SO
3 -
+ + + + _ _ _ _
= R-NH3+
R-N
H3 +
Below iep, positively charged mineral surface attracts collector with negative reactive group
Above iep, negative mineral surface adsorbs collector with positive reactive group
ZETA
PO
TEN
TIA
L, m
V60
40
20
0
- 20
- 40
- 60
Silica, SiO2
Silica + Ca
2 4 6 8 10 12
pH- 80
ZETA
PO
TEN
TIA
L, m
V60
40
20
0
- 20
- 40
- 60
Silica, SiO2
Silica + Ca
2 4 6 8 10 12
pH- 80
iep
with CaCharge reversal
no Ca
Zeta potential and selective separation
Zeta potential Reveals insight into mechanisms of aggregation and dispersion
Zeta potential measurement
Zeta potential
Applied fieldgenerates movement
Applied force generates potential
Electrophoresis Particles move, liquid
phase stationary
Electro-osmosis Liquid phase moves, particles stationary
Sedimentation potential
Particles move, liquid phase stationary
Streaming potentialLiquid phase moves, particles stationary
Sedimentation method Can handle concentrated systemsApplicable to mixed mineral systemsPotential values can be correlated with visual observations
++
+
+
+
+
+
+
--
--
- - -
-
--
-
--
-
_
+
∑=i
iEEgrvr
Sedimentation potential: principle
h
VVE a−= 0
g
E
r )( 00 ρρφεεηλζ
−=
Volume fraction of solidCalculated from measured
resistance data using Maxwell’s model
Suspension potential difference
Measured directly
Background potential difference
Measured directly
Specific conductivityCalculated from
measured resistance dataZeta
potential
Sedimentation and zeta potential
Settling column
pH meter
pH electrode
Ag/AgCl electrode(potential difference)
Timer relay
Vacuum pump
Multimeter
Ag/AgCl electrode(resistance)
Cell design
Measurements
Instrument control and data acquisition
Interfacing VXI pnp driver and serial communication
Command format SCPI (Standard Code for Programmable Instruments)
Measurement sequence and data processing MatLab R2008a program
Sample Alumina Silica Specific surface area (cm2/cm3) 5270.40 1240.2Median size (µm) 28.14 76.23 Mean size(µm) 27.85 83.06 Variance (µm2) 53.68 1551.5S.D. (µm) 7.32 39.38 CV 26.30 47.41 Mode (µm) 28.43 72.89
Sample Alumina Silica Density 3.97 2.65
Melting point (°C) 2040 1700 Chemical analysis Al2O3 > 99.0
Na2O < 0.4 Fe2O3 < 0.03 SiO2 < 0.03
SiO2 > 99.5 TiO2 ~ 0.1 K2O ~ 0.1 CaO ~ 0.03 Fe2O3 ~ 0.03 Al2O3 ~ 0.01
Validation test samples
0.0141
0.0144
0.0147
0.015
0 5 10 15 20No. Reading
Pote
ntia
l diff
eren
ce (V
)BackgroundSuspension
Sample Silica at pH 7
Potential difference
47000
49000
51000
53000
0 5 10 15 20
No. Reading
Res
ista
nce
(ohm
) Background(polarity 1)Suspension(polarity 1)Background(polarity 2)Suspension(polarity 2)
Sample Silica at pH 7
Resistance
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
10 12 14 16 18 20 22No. Reading
Volu
me
fract
ion
(-)
silicaalumina
S
Lp R
RCC
C=
+−
= ,12/
1φ
Volume fraction of solid (solid holdup)
-80
-70
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
2 4 6 8 10 12pH
Zeta
pot
entia
l (m
V)
SP methodElectrophoresis
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
2 4 6 8 10 12pH
Zeta
pot
entia
l (m
V)
SP methodElectrophoresis
Silica
Alumina
Zeta potential vs. pH
-0.004
-0.002
0
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
2.5 3.5 4.5 5.5 6.5 7.5 8.5 9.5 10.5
pH
SP (V
)
Ore 1: visual observation vs. SP
Dispersed Partially dispersed Agglomerated
pH
Visual observation (cont.)
-0.5-0.4-0.3-0.2-0.1
00.10.20.30.40.5
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
pH
SP (m
V)
-0.6-0.5-0.4-0.3-0.2-0.1
00.10.20.30.40.5
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
pH
SP (m
V)
-0.5-0.4-0.3-0.2-0.1
00.10.20.30.40.5
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14
pH
SP (m
V)
Heavy fraction Light fraction
Middle fraction
Ore 2: gravity separated fractions
SP vs. pH of the gravity separated fraction of an oreThe polynomial shows the trend for ore itselfLight fraction, the predominating part in ore, closely follows the ore trend
Effect of Effect of CationsCations on Oxideson Oxides
-40
-20
0
20
40
pH
Z.P.
(mV) CR1 CR2 CR3
With hydrolyzable metal ions
Alone
M2+ MOH+ M(OH)2
CR: Charge reversal
ZP of oxides: cation effect
Typical for silicates
Interaction: is it Mg?
Mg2+ OH-
_+
Mg(OH)2(s)
mineral
60
40
20
0
- 20
- 40
- 60
Silica, SiO2
Silica + Mg
2 4 6 8 10 12
pH
Z.P. Mg(OH)2(s)
iep ~ pH 12.5
ZETA
PO
TEN
TIA
L, m
V
V-4
H.I Voltameter
Computer
Fixed FritMedium
Fritted Gas Dispersion Tube
Medium
Ag/Ag Cl Electrodes
Drainage Stopcocks
Teflon Quick Fit Joints
V-5
Fixed FritFine
Future work: bubble swarms
M
PM
PC
T
G
S
F E
(M) Mulitimeter, (E) Ag/AgCl electrode, (PE) pH electrode, (PM) pH meter, (P) Vacuum pump, (B) Suspension beaker, (S) Magnetic stirrer, (F) Timer relay (DPDT), (PC) Personal computer, (G) Air inlet (T)
Frit and (S) Suspension tube
Future work: bubbles and particles
Contribution to original knowledge
A fully integrated ZP device using SP method has been described and validated
Analysis of real mineral systems using this technique should result in new insights to assist design of flotation systems
Surface characterization of mixed mineral systems will be possible with this technique
Concentrated slurry, similar to real systems, can be studied
Thank You