developments in nitrogen removal by reed bed treatment ......no3- + organic carbon → no2- → n2...

51
ARM Ltd Developments in Nitrogen Removal by Reed Bed Treatment Systems 15 May 2013

Upload: others

Post on 20-Oct-2020

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • ARM Ltd

    Developments in Nitrogen Removal

    by

    Reed Bed Treatment Systems

    15 May 2013

  • The Company

    Agricultural Requisites and Mechanizations

    1947 – 1990

    Agricultural engineering,

    buildings and composting

    1990 – Present

    Reed Beds

    • 500+ constructed

    • 75% for sewage

    • 25% surface run off, leachate, process water

  • Wetland Types

    Passive Wetland Systems

    • Horizontal Flow (SSF, SF)

    • Vertical Flow (VF)

    Intensive Wetlands • Forced Bed Aeration

    • Fill and Drain TAYA System

  • Wetland Mechanisms for TN removal

    1. Primarily microbial through sequential microbially mediated

    mineralisation of organic bound nitrogen (N) to N gas.

    Ammonification (aerobic and anaerobic)

    Urea/Amino acids + H2O →2NH3 + CO2

    Nitrification (aerobic)

    NH4+ + O2 → NO2- + O2 → NO3- + H2O +energy

    Denitrification (anaerobic, anoxic)

    NO3- + organic carbon → NO2- → N2 gas↑

    All proceeding at various rates.

  • Wetland Mechanisms for TN removal (cont)

    2. Removal of N bound in solid material occurs through

    filtration and settlement - Apparent

    3. Plant and microbial biomass uptake – Apparent

    4. Accretion in silts and litter

  • Wetland Types

    Passive Wetland Systems

    • Horizontal Flow (SSF, SF)

    • Vertical Flow (VF)

    Intensive Wetlands • Forced Bed Aeration

    • Fill and Drain TAYA System

  • Horizontal Flow Reed Bed : Continuous flow

    Passive Wetland Systems

    Surface Flow

    Sub Surface Flow

  • Passive Wetland Systems

    Horizontal Flow Systems

    • Saturated

    • Low Oxygen tensions

    • Apparent Oxygen transfer rate is 7g/m2/d

    • Suited to Denitrification (carbon source needed)

    • Ammonification does occur

    • Nitrification occurs but unreliably.

  • Wetland Types

    Passive Wetland Systems

    • Horizontal Flow (SSF, SF)

    • Vertical Flow (VF)

  • Vertical Flow : Batch flow

    Passive Wetland Configurations

  • Passive Wetland Systems

    Vertical Flow Systems

    • Temporary saturation, re-aerated.

    • Relatively higher, more coinsistent Oxygen tensions than HF.

    • Apparent Oxygen transfer rate is 25g/m2/d.

    • Suited to Ammonification and Nitrification.

    • Denitrification is minimal.

  • • Ammonification

    Organic N to ammonia.

    Can be achieved in Horizontal Flow and Vertical Flow Reed Beds.

    • Nitrification

    Ammonia oxidation to Nitrate.

    which can be achieved in Vertical Flow Reed Bed.

    • Denitrification

    Nitrate reduction anoxic conditions to Nitrogen gas.

    Which can be achieved in a Horizontal Flow Reed Bed.

    • Combining Nitrification and Denitrification leads to perfect recycling by returning the

    N2 to the atmosphere from whence it came.

    Passive Combination: Vertical and horizontal

  • • Oaklands Park is a Camphill Community dedicated to looking after

    handicapped people.

    • Full scale system for 65 pe hybrid system 2 sets of VF beds followed

    by 2 sets of HF beds.

    Passive Combination: Vertical and horizontal

  • Inter-stage data (mg/l) for Oaklands Park averages of 47 samples over 2 years

    Influent Stage1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4

    VF VF HF HF

    BOD 285 57 14 15 7

    TSS 169 53 17 11 9

    NH4N 50.5 29.2 14 15.4 11.1

    Oxd.N 1.7 10.2 22.5 10 7.2

    Nitrification Denitrification

    Passive Combination: Vertical and horizontal

  • • HF can denitrify effectively if we have a carbon source.

    • VF can nitrify effectively at low ammonia levels (up to 50 - 100 mg/l – single

    pass)

    • Combination systems can achieve total N removal to secondary treatment

    level.

    • Rely on the diffusion of atmospheric oxygen into the effluent to ‘fuel’

    microbial activity.

    • Subject to vagaries of local weather.

    • Have a relatively large land take.

    • Work well if sized and designed properly.

    • Robust

    Passive Wetland Configurations

  • Wetland Types

    Passive Wetland Systems

    • Horizontal Flow (HF)

    • Vertical Flow (VF)

    Intensive Wetlands • Forced Bed AerationTM

    • Fill and Drain TAYA System

  • Passive

    Natural Systems

    Active

    Mechanical

    Treatment

    Systems

    Area Requirements MOST LEAST

    LEAST MOST Energy and O&M Needs

    Water Treatment: Natural vs Mechanical

    Intensive Treatment Systems

  • Wetland Types

    Intensive Wetlands • Forced Bed AerationTM

    • Fill and Drain TAYA System

  • Forced Bed Aeration™

  • Forced Bed AerationTM

    • A new technology for enhancing reed bed performance.

    • Tried and tested in the USA.

    • FBATM compliments existing reed bed technology.

    • Increases treatment capacity of reed beds by up to 15 times.

    • Adds flexibility to counter variability in loads.

  • Forced Bed Aeration™

    • Reduces variability in performance (counters climatic issues).

    • Reduced area required (lowers capital costs).

    • No constraints on bed dimensions or aspect ratio.

    • 1 to 2m deep.

    • Can be retrofitted into existing wetlands.

  • Standard and Forced Reed Beds 02 transfer rates

    Series1 0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    Horizontal Flow 5g/m2/d

    Vertical Flow 17-25 g/m2/d

    Forced Bed Aeration up to 160 g/m2/d

    Typical Oxygen Transfer Rates ForDifferent Reed Bed Systems

  • Passive & Mechanical Systems Power Costs

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    1.4

    1.6

    kW

    h /

    of

    wast

    ew

    ate

    r

    Active Systems Passive Systems

    FBA

    Systems

  • Wolseley Area: 72m2

    Flow 0.54 - 7 m3/d

    HRT: 3 – 37 days

    Aeration 10 hrs

  • Wolseley Bridge Ammonia Removal

    14 hrs aeration

    90% 98.9%

    10 hrs aeration

  • Balhall Area: 151m2 +31m2

    Flow 5 m3/d

    Aeration 18 hrs

  • Balhall WwTW: Single Bed, Passive, VF system

    207

    86

    55

    26 35

    26

    0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    BOD SS NH4

    Balhall Passive Performance Spot Sample Averages

    Suspended Solids, BOD, Ammonia

    Influent Effluent

  • Balhall WwTW: Two bed, Aerated, VF system

    460.6

    26.1 11.6

    144.3

    51.4

    21.2

    90.1

    13.5 1.8

    0.0

    50.0

    100.0

    150.0

    200.0

    250.0

    300.0

    350.0

    400.0

    450.0

    500.0

    Settled Reed Bed 1 Out Reed Bed 2 Out

    Balhall FBATM Performance Spot Sample Averages

    Suspended Solids, BOD, Ammonia

    BOD Suspended Solids Ammonia

  • 0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    400

    450

    500

    Sep-99 Sep-00 Sep-01 Sep-02 Sep-03 Sep-04

    TAN

    Concentr

    ati

    on [

    mg/L]

    Influent Effluent

    New Pretreatment System and

    Forced Bed Aeration ™ System

    Iron fouling

    No Aeration Startup

    Jones County Landfill: Total Ammonia (TAN)

  • Eichten Cheese CBOD Removal

    0

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    7000

    8000

    Mar-9

    8

    Mar-9

    9

    Apr-9

    9

    Apr-9

    9

    Jun-9

    9

    Jul-9

    9

    Sep-9

    9

    Dec-9

    9

    Mar-0

    0

    Jun-0

    0

    Sep-0

    0

    Dec-0

    0

    Mar-0

    1

    Jun-0

    1

    Sep-0

    1

    Dec-0

    1

    Mar-0

    2

    Jun-0

    2

    Sep-0

    2

    Dec-0

    2

    Mar-0

    3

    Jun-0

    3

    Sep-0

    3

    Dec-0

    3

    Mar-0

    4

    Jun-0

    4

    Jun-0

    5

    CB

    OD

    5 (

    mg

    /L)

    Eichten Cheese CBOD Removal

    In Out

    Intermitten

    t Aeration

    Forced Bed Aeration TM

  • Buffalo Niagara International Airport Glycol removal from surface water

    1.7 Ha, removing 4,500 kg/day

    Heathrow trials

  • Buffalo Airport De-icing Fluid Treatment

  • Buffalo Niagara International Airport

  • Intensive Wetland Systems

    Forced Bed Aeration (FBATM)

    • Increases Oxygen availability significantly.

    • Increases wetland nitrification capacity 10 fold.

    • More consistent performance, especially with beds in series.

    • Reduced area requirements, can go deeper also.

    • Denitrification options under investigation.

    • Looking for an AD digestate trial.

    • Power consumption.

  • Wetland Types

    Intensive Wetlands • Forced Bed AerationTM

    • Fill and Drain TAYA System

  • TAYA Treatment System

    • Developed from reciprocating wetland technology.

    • Engineered to maximise the efficiency of the

    microbial biomass through nutrient management

    and effective natural aeration.

    • Proprietary open channel bottom pumping design,

    maximises the use of gravity during operation, to

    minimize power consumption, maintenance and

    operational costs.

    • Complete mix is achieved and thus maximum

    dilution.

  • The design of the wetland incorporates the filling and draining

    of subsurface flow basins.

    Minimum Head

    • Pumping from the bottom

    • Open Channel arrangement

    Feed arrangement

    • Max dilution

    • Complete mix

    TAYA Treatment System

  • TAYA Treatment System

  • TAYA Effluent TAYA Influent Anaerobic Ponds Influent mg/l

    20 500 12,000 CBOD

    30 250 15,000 TSS

    40 - 100 900 900 -1,300 NH4

    300 300 300 Flow

    (m3/d)

    Lahav Kibbutz : Summary Operational Data

  • Lahav Kibbutz Piggery: Operational Data

  • Lahav Kibbutz Piggery: Operational Data

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    800

    900

    1000

    1100

    1200

    1300

    1400

    1/2/10 2/21/10 4/12/10 6/1/10 7/21/10 9/9/10 10/29/10 12/18/10 2/6/11 3/28/11 5/17/11 7/6/11 8/25/11

    Value (ppm) Lahav - TN Removal

    Influent

    Effluent

  • TAYA Treatment System

    TAYA System

    • Effective natural aeration.

    • Flexibility through process control.

    • Nitrification/Ammanox and denitrification.

    • No sludge production.

    • Small footprint even compared to FBATM.

    • AD digestate systems being installed in Italy this year.

    • Need a climate trial in the UK.

  • Helmholtz Centre for

    Environmental Research (UFZ)

    Three research campuses Leipzig, Halle, Magdeburg 1,000 employees 180 post-grads and post-docs

    Additional partners

    … and massive support from many colleagues, friends, and family

  • Fo

    to:

    Künze

    lman

    n/U

    FZ

    Septic Tank

    (primary treatment)

    Unsaturated vertical flow filters

    Saturated vertical

    flow with aeration

    Horizontal flow Fill and

    Drain

    1m deep +

    aeration

    0.25m deep 0.5m deep

    1-3mm Sand

    periodic resting

    1-3mm Sand, no

    resting

    4-8mm gravel,

    no resting

    8-16mm

    gravel,

    no resting

  • Comparative Ammonia Removal

    NH4-N

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6

    nHRT (days)

    Co

    nce

    ntr

    ati

    on

    (m

    g/L

    )

    HF 1.0m Aerated + plants

    HF 1.0m Aerated - plants

    HF 0.25m + plants

    HF 0.25m - plants

    HF 0.5m + plants

    HF 0.5m - plants

  • Comparative Nitrate Generation

    NO3-N

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6

    nHRT (days)

    Co

    nce

    ntr

    ati

    on

    (m

    g/L

    )

    HF 1.0m Aerated + plants

    HF 1.0m Aerated - plants

    HF 0.25m + plants

    HF 0.25m - plants

    HF 0.5m + plants

    HF 0.5m - plants

  • Comparative Total N removal

    Total N

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6

    nHRT (days)

    Co

    nc

    en

    tra

    tio

    n (

    mg

    /L)

    HF 1.0m Aerated + plants

    HF 1.0m Aerated - plants

    HF 0.25m + plants

    HF 0.25m - plants

    HF 0.5m + plants

    HF 0.5m - plants

  • Total N removal summary

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    Unplanted Planted Unplanted Planted Unplanted Planted Unplanted

    Horizontal Flow Aerated HF Vertical Flow FaD

    System Design

    TN

    Ma

    ss

    Re

    mo

    va

    l R

    ate

    (g/m

    2.d

    ay)

  • Summary

    • Passive Reed Bed/Constructed wetland systems can effectively

    reduce total N levels when used in combination demonstrating

    the principle of total N reduction in wetlands.

    • Intensive systems through increased oxygen transfer rates can

    achieve higher removal rates more consistently.

    • FBATM systems show significant potential for AD digestate

    treatment, though not yet proven, but looking for trials…

    • The TAYA systems has already demonstrated high level

    nitrification and denitrification and the first commercial AD

    digestate treatment installations are being installed this year

    in Italy. We are looking for UK climate trials …

  • Thank you