development of polarized xe gas target for neutron experiment

8
Journal of Physics: Conference Series OPEN ACCESS Development of polarized Xe gas target for neutron experiment at J-PARC To cite this article: K Sakai et al 2012 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 340 012037 View the article online for updates and enhancements. You may also like Theoretical modeling of the hybrid membrane-gas hydrate crystallisation process for xenon recovery M S Sergeeva, A N Petukhov, M M Trubyanov et al. - Magnetic resonance imaging with hyperpolarized agents: methods and applications Erin B Adamson, Kai D Ludwig, David G Mummy et al. - Trapping of xenon gas in closed inner spaces of carbon nanomaterials for stable gas storage under high-vacuum condition Keita Kobayashi and Hidehiro Yasuda - Recent citations An optimized microfabricated platform for the optical generation and detection of hyperpolarized 129Xe Daniel J. Kennedy et al - Development of portable polarized 3 He neutron spin filter and its application to magnetic field imaging at J-PARC K Sakai et al - This content was downloaded from IP address 177.71.18.243 on 14/01/2022 at 10:57

Upload: others

Post on 11-Feb-2022

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Journal of Physics Conference Series

OPEN ACCESS

Development of polarized Xe gas target forneutron experiment at J-PARCTo cite this article K Sakai et al 2012 J Phys Conf Ser 340 012037

View the article online for updates and enhancements

You may also likeTheoretical modeling of the hybridmembrane-gas hydrate crystallisationprocess for xenon recoveryM S Sergeeva A N Petukhov M MTrubyanov et al

-

Magnetic resonance imaging withhyperpolarized agents methods andapplicationsErin B Adamson Kai D Ludwig David GMummy et al

-

Trapping of xenon gas in closed innerspaces of carbon nanomaterials for stablegas storage under high-vacuum conditionKeita Kobayashi and Hidehiro Yasuda

-

Recent citationsAn optimized microfabricated platform forthe optical generation and detection ofhyperpolarized 129XeDaniel J Kennedy et al

-

Development of portable polarized 3Heneutron spin filter and its application tomagnetic field imaging at J-PARCK Sakai et al

-

This content was downloaded from IP address 1777118243 on 14012022 at 1057

Development of polarized Xe gas target for neutron

experiment at J-PARC

K Sakai1 T Oku1 T Shinohara1 H Kira1 M Ooi1 F Maekawa1

K Kakurai1 T Ino2 Y Arimoto2 HM Shimizu2 Y Sakaguchi3

J Suzuki3 K Ohoyama4 LJ Chang5

1JAEA Tokai Ibaraki 319-1195 Japan2KEK Tsukuba Ibaraki 305-0801 Japan3Research Center for Neutron Science and Technology Comprehensive Research Organizationfor Science and Society (CROSS) Tokai Ibaraki 319-1106 Japan4Institute for Materials Research Tohoku University Sendai Miyagi 980-8577 Japan5Department of Physics National Cheng Kung University Tainan 70101 Taiwan

E-mail kenjisakaij-parcjp

Abstract At the Materials and Life science experimental Facility (MLF) in J-PARC anexperiment of detecting a neutron polarizing ability caused by a neutron-nuclear spin correlationat a resonant peak of 129Xe is planned We evaluated measurable quantities based on a neutronoptical theorem developed a polarized Xe gas system and carried out a feasibility test of ourapparatus

1 Introduction

Recent developments of spin exchange optical pumping (SEOP) technique for polarizing noblegases have enabled to obtain the gases of 10minus2 minus 10minus1 nuclear spin polarization at pressures of10minus1 minus 100 atm [1] The polarized gases have been applied extensively in various fields Forexample the polarized Xe gas has been utilized as a probe for investigating nuclear electricdipole moment (EDM) by measuring Larmor precession precisely in a fundamental physics [2]a standard sample for nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) method in a material science and ablood flow tracer in a medical industry [3] For low energy neutron experiments the Xe gas andsolid are also expected to be utilized as high polarized targets and samples under a low magneticfield For example an NMR-modulated neutron scattering is proposed in order to study slowconformational changes in liquids by measuring a neutron scattering from the polarized Xe nucleiwhich are solved in water solutions [4] It is also interesting to measure a correlation term s middot I

of a neutron spin s and a target nuclear spin I with a high polarized Xe target for a verificationof a neutron optical theorem (NOPT) However there seem to be few experimental data on thes middot I term of Xe at the present [5] At a Materials and Life science experimental Facility (MLF)in J-PARC an experiment of detecting a neutron polarizing ability caused by the s middot I term ata resonant peak of 129Xe is planned and a polarized Xe gas target based on the SEOP has beendeveloped This paper reports on the plan and preparative status of our experiment

5th European Conference on Neutron Scattering IOP PublishingJournal of Physics Conference Series 340 (2012) 012037 doi1010881742-65963401012037

Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd 1

2 Evaluation of neutron-nuclear spin correlation based on the NOPT

According to the NOPT a propagation of low energy neutron through target material isdescribed by a forward scattering amplitude f

f = A + Bs middot I + Cs middot k + Ds middot (k times I) (1)

where s I and k denote unit vectors representing directions of a neutron spin a target nuclearspin and a incident neutron momentum respectively [6 7] The complex coefficients A B C Dare described as a function of a neutron energy En though they are considered to be constantbelow a thermal neutron energy A and B represent parity conserving (PC) amplitudes causedby strong interactions and C and D represent parity non-conserving (PNC) amplitudes causedby weak interactions In Eq (1) imaginary parts of the s middot I s middot k and s middot (k times I) terms induceneutron spin s dependent cross sections ∆σI ∆σk and ∆σktimesI relative to directions of I k andk times I while their real parts induce neutron spin rotations φI φk and φktimesI around axes of I k

and k times IObservations of the PNC amplitudes are important for study of neutron fundamental physics

The PNC effects caused by the s middot k term have been estimated about 10minus7 and verified byobserving helicity asymmetries Ak of the spin dependent cross sections ∆σk with proton-protonscatterings [8] However they have been found to be enhanced in neutron-nucleus scatteringsespecially values of Ak at p-wave resonances of 139La 131Xe and so on have reached up to10minus2 minus 10minus1 [9 10 11] These enhancements are explained by a model based on a interferencebetween the p-wave and its neighboring s-wave resonances [12] According to the model Ak

and φk are described as a function of En with a parity mixing matrix element xW and Briet-Wigner (B-W) resonance formula In particular both Ak and φk of 139La have been observedwith cold and epithermal neutrons and they were consistent with predictions deduced from themodel [11 13 14 15] The result suggests that the NOPT on the s middot k term is valid up toan epithermal neutron energy region But for verification of the NOPT based on Eq (1) itbecomes necessary to measure the quantities caused by the s middot I and s middot (k times I) terms withpolarized targets

The enhancement of the PNC effect at the p-wave resonance is considered to be useful fordetecting a time reversal non-conserving (TRNC) effect caused by the smiddot(ktimesI) term [7 16] Forrealizing to measure the TRNC effect it becomes a key technique to reduce an affect of neutronspin rotation frequency ωI and ωH caused by the s middot I term and an external magnetic field H

for holding target polarizations where ωI(= dφIdt) and ωH are known as a pseudo-magneticfrequency and a Larmor precession frequency Especially it is important to comprehend ωI as afunction of En because ωI was predicted to increase in vicinities of resonant peaks [17 18]

We attempted to evaluate measurable quantities of 129Xe(I = 12) and 131Xe(I = 32)caused by the s middot I term As the PNC effects are normally much smaller than the PC effectsEq (1) is approximately described as f asymp A + Bs middot I and ∆σI and ωI are given as

∆σI =4π

kIm(f+ minus fminus) ωI = minus

2πNI h

mnRe(f+ minus fminus) (2)

where NI and mn denote a number density of target and a neutron mass and f+(fminus) is theamplitude f with the neutron spin s parallel (anti-parallel) to the target spin I [18] It isconsidered to be difficult to estimate neutron scattering amplitudes caused by the s middot I termbecause a complete set of resonance parameters is not known in most case at least not forbound-state resonances (En lt 0) [19] But the amplitudes caused by the s middot I term at resonantpeaks with strong spin selectivity could be estimated by using Eq (2) and the B-W formula[17 18] Fig 1 represents the estimated ∆σI and ωI of 129Xe as a function of En around a96 eV s-wave resonant peak (total angular momentum J = 1) This resonance selects neutrons

5th European Conference on Neutron Scattering IOP PublishingJournal of Physics Conference Series 340 (2012) 012037 doi1010881742-65963401012037

2

Figure 1 Estimated values of (A) spin dependent cross section ∆σI and (B) spin rotation frequencyωI at 96 eV s-wave resonant peak of 129Xe

with spin s = +12 based on a conservation of an angular momentum Fig 1 was calculated byusing resonance parameters of 129Xe based on the evaluated data in ENDFB-VII0 [20] and byassuming a 129Xe gas of 1 atm pressure It predicts that ∆σI and ωI depend on En strongly andincrease at the resonant peak Especially ωI exhibits a dispersion curve as a function of En andits maximum value is 4 times 105 radsec which corresponds to a pseudo-magnetic field H

lowast asymp 22mTesla We also calculated ωI of 131Xe at a 144 eV s-wave resonant peak (J = 2) and obtainedthe maximum value of ωI asymp 1 times 107 radsec which corresponds to H

lowast asymp 57 mTesla

3 Plan to measure neutron-nuclear spin correlation at BL10 in J-PARC

Figure 2 Experimental apparatus for detecting neutron polarizing ability of 129Xe

As the first step to detect the s middot I term we will measure a neutron polarizing ability at the96 eV s-wave resonant peak of 129Xe when unpolarized neutrons transmit through a polarizedXe target It has an advantage of realizing the measurement without a neutron spin polarizerthough its predicted value is smaller than that of a spin dependent cross section asymmetryAI = (σI+ minus σIminus)(σI+ + σIminus) where σI+ and σIminus denote the cross section with s parallel andanti-parallel to I

Our experimental apparatus is schematically shown in Fig 2 Our experiment will becarried out at a neutron beam line 10 (BL10) of the MLF in J-PARC [21] Pulsed neutronbeams supplied from a spallation neutron source transmit through collimators a polarized Xe

5th European Conference on Neutron Scattering IOP PublishingJournal of Physics Conference Series 340 (2012) 012037 doi1010881742-65963401012037

3

gas target a referential metal foil and are counted by a neutron detector placed at 14 m positionapart from the source The movable collimators placed at 7 m and 128 m positions are usedfor adjusting the neutron beam size and intensity The metal foil mounted on a goniometeris used in order to compensate time fluctuations of the detector by comparing resonant peakamplitudes between the foil and 129Xe measured with the same detector A ratio Rx betweenneutron transmissions with the target polarized and unpolarized is expressed as

Rx = cosh(NxσxlxρPx) (3)

where Nx σx lx Px denote a number density cross section thickness and polarization of targetnuclei x respectively Spin dependent parameters ρ of the target become 13 of 129Xe and 1 of3He Its neutron polarization is given as Pn =

radic

1 minus Rminus2x with Rx in Eq (3)

The Xe gas target is polarized by utilizing an in-situ SEOP system developed for a polarized3He neutron spin filter at J-PARC [22 23] It is designed compactly for mounting onexperimental tables in narrow areas of beam lines It consists of a diode laser (nLight VSA-100-796 DL) driven at an output power of sim47 W an external cavity for narrowing wave lengthof laser laser light transform optics and a solenoid coil of 20 cm in diameter and 30 cm longfor holding the target polarization A Xe gas of sim1 atm is contained in a cylindrical glass cellabout 3 cm in diameter and 5 minus 10 cm long with a N2 gas and a small amount of Rb Atomicspins of Rb are polarized by a resonance absorption of a circularly polarized laser light of a 795nm wave length and Xe nuclear spins are polarized by the spin exchange with the polarized Rbatoms The cell is mounted in an oven of 10 cm in diameter and 12 cm long The oven is madeof aluminum (Al) and placed at a center of the solenoid coil A temperature inside the oven iskept to 350 minus 450 Kelvin for obtaining a Rb vapor Around the cell a pickup coil and a drivecoil are mounted for the NMR measurement by an adiabatic fast passage (AFP) method TheAFP-NMR system is very useful for evaluating and monitoring a polarization PXe of the Xe cellby periodic measurements of NMR signals during beam experiments These components of theSEOP system are set in a box of 40 times 40 times 60 cm3 size for shielding laser light

We guess that practical values of ∆RXe = 1 minus RXe in Eq (3) will be 10minus3 minus 10minus2 Actually∆RXe is estimated about 0003 with a natural Xe gas of 15 atmmiddotcm thickness and 0012 with anenriched 129Xe gas of 10 atmmiddotcm thickness if a realizable PXe sim 02 is assumed For obtainingthe Xe gas cell with a practical thickness lXe and PXe it is important to know the pressuredependence of PXe and the effect of the relaxation due to collisions between Xe atom and thecell wall which is expressed by the wall relaxation time tw [24] Time evolution of a noble gasx polarization Px(t) is described as

Px(t) = PRbγse

γse + Γw(1 minus eminus(γse+Γw)t) = Px(1 minus eminusγgrt) (4)

where PRb γse Γw and γgr denote Rb atom polarization Rb-x spin exchange rate wall relaxationrate and growth rate of Px Px represents an attainable value of Px(t) and a inverse of Γw

corresponds to tw In the case of Xe it is known that PXe decreases with increasing a Xe atompressure because of a decrement of PRb by a increment of a Rb spin destruction rate due tothe effect of RbminusXe binary collisions While for reducing the wall relaxation some papershave reported to obtain long values of tw more than 20 minutes by coating inner surfaces ofborosilicate glass cells (Pyrex) with SurfaSil [24 25] For neutron experiments however itis required to select cell materials with their neutron cross sections as small as possible Weattempted to measure tw of the cell filled with a natural Xe gas of 26 atm pressure in a sphericalquartz glass of 3 cm diameter and obtained long tw more than 50 minutes This result suggeststhat quartz glass becomes a suitable material for the polarized Xe cell

5th European Conference on Neutron Scattering IOP PublishingJournal of Physics Conference Series 340 (2012) 012037 doi1010881742-65963401012037

4

Figure 3 Time of flight (TOF) spectrum of neutrons transmitting through unpolarized Xe cell

4 Feasibility test for measuring neutron polarizing ability of 129XeAccording to the apparatus in Fig 2 we have attempted to check the compensation method oftime fluctuations by comparing resonant peak amplitudes between the Xe cell and the referentialmetal foil In the test a cylindrical quartz cell of 5 cm long filled with a natural Xe gas of 3 atmpressure a silver (Ag) foil of 10 microm thickness mounted on a goniometer and a Li glass scintillatorof 1 mm thickness were used as the cell metal foil and neutron detector Fig 3 represents a timeof flight (TOF) spectrum of neutrons transmitting through the unpolarized Xe cell It suggeststhat the Xe cell and Ag foil are suitable thickness because the both resonant peaks at 96 eV of129Xe and 52 eV of 109Ag could be distinguished with enough peak amplitudes In Fig 2 aneffective thickness lAg of the Ag foil depends on a inclination angle θ of the foil relative to theneutron beam direction and changes by rotating the goniometer We attempted to demonstratea sensitivity of our system by detecting a slight change of the ratio ∆R(θ) = 1minus rres(θ)rres(0

)as a function of θ where rres(θ) represents the amplitude ratio between the 96 eV resonantpeak of 129Xe and the 52 eV resonant peak of 109Ag In the beam test during a few hours∆R(30) = 0060 plusmn 0014 and ∆R(20) = 0013 plusmn 0011 have been obtained This preliminaryresult suggests that the sensitivity corresponding to ∆RXe = 1 minus RXe in Eq (3) reaches tosim 10minus2 in statistical errors

Figure 4 Typical NMR amplitudes (A) VXe of 129Xe and (B) VHe of 3He observed at νres =50 kHz

For monitoring the polarization of the cell during beam experiments an AFP-NMR system

5th European Conference on Neutron Scattering IOP PublishingJournal of Physics Conference Series 340 (2012) 012037 doi1010881742-65963401012037

5

has been developed [26 27] It can work inside of the Al oven in our SEOP system and detectNMR signals both of 3He and 129Xe at a same resonant frequency νres For demonstrating anability of our NMR system the measurement of PHe of a polarized 3He filter with cold neutronshas been carried out with observing NMR signal amplitudes VHe of 3He periodically Accordingto Eq (3) PHe was determined from the ratio RHe between neutron transmissions with the 3Hefilter polarized and unpolarized In the test a cylindrical glass cell of 5 cm long containing in a3He gas of 32 atm was used as the 3He filter Fig 4 represents the typical NMR amplitudes VXe

of 129Xe and VHe of 3He observed at νres =50 kHz Fig 5 represents time evolution process ofPHe deduced from RHe and VHe from a start time (t = 0) of the optical pumping By fitting theobserved values with Eq (4) macrPHe = 026 plusmn 002 was obtained from Fig 5 (A) It correspondsto VHe asymp 183 mV deduced from Fig 5 (B) While γminus1

gr = 954 plusmn 019 hours was also obtained

as a growth time of Fig 5 (B) It was consistent with the γminus1gr of Fig 5 (A) in statistical errors

We guess that the observed PHe might be small due to the lack of adjustment of the laser lighttransform optics because PHe ge 06 is obtained by using our SEOP system usually By usingthe correlation between PHe and VHe obtained from this test the polarization PXe of the Xecell can be deduced from the NMR amplitude VXe Actually we could obtain about 001 as PXe

corresponding to the amplitude VXe in Fig 4 (A)

Figure 5 Time evolutions of (A) PHe deduced from RHe and (B) VHe of NMR as a function of time tfrom start time (t = 0) of the optical pumping

5 Summary

We mentioned interest in the measurement of the s middot I term as a function of En for verificationof the NOPT and reported the experimental plan and feasibility tests for detecting the neutronpolarizing ability at the 96 eV resonant peak of 129Xe Although the statistical accuracy of∆RXe is dominated by the counting capability of our system at the present it will be achievedto sim 10minus3 by improving the detector and data acquisition system For obtaining the practicallXe and PXe we will attempt to optimize conditions of the SEOP system and prepare a Xe cellfilled with an enriched 129Xe gas of a low pressure in order to avoid a decrement of PXe withincreasing a Xe pressure For the study on the s middot I term in detail however the measurementsof AI and ωI with polarized neutron beams are indispensable Actually by using Pn = 05polarized neutron beams AI asymp 0038 is expected with a natural Xe cell of PXe = 02 and 15atmmiddotcm thickness though ∆RXe asymp 0003 is estimated with the same cell For realizing thesemeasurements developments of a polarized proton filter and a high pressure 3He filter will bedesirable as neutron spin filters at the MLF in J-PARC [28]

5th European Conference on Neutron Scattering IOP PublishingJournal of Physics Conference Series 340 (2012) 012037 doi1010881742-65963401012037

6

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the staffs of the MLF at J-PARC for their useful help and suggestions Thisresearch has been partly supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (No22604005) andthe Quantum Beam Fundamental Development Program MEXT

References

[1] B Larson et al Phys Rev A 44 (1991) 3108[2] A Yoshimi et al Phys Lett A 304 (2002) 13[3] IC Ruset et al Phys Rev Lett 96 (2006) 053002[4] AD Buckingham Chem Phys Lett 371 (2003) 517[5] VR Skoy J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol 110 (2005) 471[6] L Stodolsky Phys Lett B 172 (1986) 5[7] PK Kabir et al Phys Rev D 25 (1982) 25[8] R Balzer et al Phys Rev C 30 (1984) 1409[9] Y Masuda et al Nucl Phys A 478 (1988) 737

[10] VW Yuan et al Phys Rev A 44 (1991) 2178[11] HM Shimizu et al Nucl Phys A 552 (1993) 293[12] OP Sushkov et al JETP Lett A 32 (1980) 352[13] T Haseyama et al Phys Lett B 5341-4 (2002) 39[14] EA Kolomensky et al Phys Lett B 107 ( 1981) 272[15] B Heckel et al Phys Rev C 29 (1984) 2389[16] L Stodolsky Nucl Phys B 197 (1982) 213[17] VE Bunakov et al Phys Lett B 429 (1998) 7[18] VP Gudkov Physics Repors 212 No2 (1992) 77[19] L Koester et al Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 49 (1991) 65[20] ML Chadwick et al Nuclear Data Sheets 107 (2006) 2931 lthttpt2lanlgovdataneutron7htmlgt[21] K Oikawa et al Nuclear Instr and methods A 589 (2008) 310[22] H Kira et al Physica B 406 (2011) 2433[23] T Oku et al ldquoDevelopments of In-Situ SEOP Polarized 3He Neutron Spin Filter at J-PARCrdquo in these

proceedings[24] H Sato et al Nuclear Instr and methods A 402 (1998) 241[25] X Zeng et al Phys Lett A 96 (1983) 191[26] T Ino et al rdquoA compact SEOP 3He neutron spin filter with AFP NMRrdquo in these proceedings[27] T Ino et al Physica B 404 (2009) 2667[28] K Sakai et al Nuclear Instr and methods A 402 (1998) 244

5th European Conference on Neutron Scattering IOP PublishingJournal of Physics Conference Series 340 (2012) 012037 doi1010881742-65963401012037

7

Development of polarized Xe gas target for neutron

experiment at J-PARC

K Sakai1 T Oku1 T Shinohara1 H Kira1 M Ooi1 F Maekawa1

K Kakurai1 T Ino2 Y Arimoto2 HM Shimizu2 Y Sakaguchi3

J Suzuki3 K Ohoyama4 LJ Chang5

1JAEA Tokai Ibaraki 319-1195 Japan2KEK Tsukuba Ibaraki 305-0801 Japan3Research Center for Neutron Science and Technology Comprehensive Research Organizationfor Science and Society (CROSS) Tokai Ibaraki 319-1106 Japan4Institute for Materials Research Tohoku University Sendai Miyagi 980-8577 Japan5Department of Physics National Cheng Kung University Tainan 70101 Taiwan

E-mail kenjisakaij-parcjp

Abstract At the Materials and Life science experimental Facility (MLF) in J-PARC anexperiment of detecting a neutron polarizing ability caused by a neutron-nuclear spin correlationat a resonant peak of 129Xe is planned We evaluated measurable quantities based on a neutronoptical theorem developed a polarized Xe gas system and carried out a feasibility test of ourapparatus

1 Introduction

Recent developments of spin exchange optical pumping (SEOP) technique for polarizing noblegases have enabled to obtain the gases of 10minus2 minus 10minus1 nuclear spin polarization at pressures of10minus1 minus 100 atm [1] The polarized gases have been applied extensively in various fields Forexample the polarized Xe gas has been utilized as a probe for investigating nuclear electricdipole moment (EDM) by measuring Larmor precession precisely in a fundamental physics [2]a standard sample for nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) method in a material science and ablood flow tracer in a medical industry [3] For low energy neutron experiments the Xe gas andsolid are also expected to be utilized as high polarized targets and samples under a low magneticfield For example an NMR-modulated neutron scattering is proposed in order to study slowconformational changes in liquids by measuring a neutron scattering from the polarized Xe nucleiwhich are solved in water solutions [4] It is also interesting to measure a correlation term s middot I

of a neutron spin s and a target nuclear spin I with a high polarized Xe target for a verificationof a neutron optical theorem (NOPT) However there seem to be few experimental data on thes middot I term of Xe at the present [5] At a Materials and Life science experimental Facility (MLF)in J-PARC an experiment of detecting a neutron polarizing ability caused by the s middot I term ata resonant peak of 129Xe is planned and a polarized Xe gas target based on the SEOP has beendeveloped This paper reports on the plan and preparative status of our experiment

5th European Conference on Neutron Scattering IOP PublishingJournal of Physics Conference Series 340 (2012) 012037 doi1010881742-65963401012037

Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd 1

2 Evaluation of neutron-nuclear spin correlation based on the NOPT

According to the NOPT a propagation of low energy neutron through target material isdescribed by a forward scattering amplitude f

f = A + Bs middot I + Cs middot k + Ds middot (k times I) (1)

where s I and k denote unit vectors representing directions of a neutron spin a target nuclearspin and a incident neutron momentum respectively [6 7] The complex coefficients A B C Dare described as a function of a neutron energy En though they are considered to be constantbelow a thermal neutron energy A and B represent parity conserving (PC) amplitudes causedby strong interactions and C and D represent parity non-conserving (PNC) amplitudes causedby weak interactions In Eq (1) imaginary parts of the s middot I s middot k and s middot (k times I) terms induceneutron spin s dependent cross sections ∆σI ∆σk and ∆σktimesI relative to directions of I k andk times I while their real parts induce neutron spin rotations φI φk and φktimesI around axes of I k

and k times IObservations of the PNC amplitudes are important for study of neutron fundamental physics

The PNC effects caused by the s middot k term have been estimated about 10minus7 and verified byobserving helicity asymmetries Ak of the spin dependent cross sections ∆σk with proton-protonscatterings [8] However they have been found to be enhanced in neutron-nucleus scatteringsespecially values of Ak at p-wave resonances of 139La 131Xe and so on have reached up to10minus2 minus 10minus1 [9 10 11] These enhancements are explained by a model based on a interferencebetween the p-wave and its neighboring s-wave resonances [12] According to the model Ak

and φk are described as a function of En with a parity mixing matrix element xW and Briet-Wigner (B-W) resonance formula In particular both Ak and φk of 139La have been observedwith cold and epithermal neutrons and they were consistent with predictions deduced from themodel [11 13 14 15] The result suggests that the NOPT on the s middot k term is valid up toan epithermal neutron energy region But for verification of the NOPT based on Eq (1) itbecomes necessary to measure the quantities caused by the s middot I and s middot (k times I) terms withpolarized targets

The enhancement of the PNC effect at the p-wave resonance is considered to be useful fordetecting a time reversal non-conserving (TRNC) effect caused by the smiddot(ktimesI) term [7 16] Forrealizing to measure the TRNC effect it becomes a key technique to reduce an affect of neutronspin rotation frequency ωI and ωH caused by the s middot I term and an external magnetic field H

for holding target polarizations where ωI(= dφIdt) and ωH are known as a pseudo-magneticfrequency and a Larmor precession frequency Especially it is important to comprehend ωI as afunction of En because ωI was predicted to increase in vicinities of resonant peaks [17 18]

We attempted to evaluate measurable quantities of 129Xe(I = 12) and 131Xe(I = 32)caused by the s middot I term As the PNC effects are normally much smaller than the PC effectsEq (1) is approximately described as f asymp A + Bs middot I and ∆σI and ωI are given as

∆σI =4π

kIm(f+ minus fminus) ωI = minus

2πNI h

mnRe(f+ minus fminus) (2)

where NI and mn denote a number density of target and a neutron mass and f+(fminus) is theamplitude f with the neutron spin s parallel (anti-parallel) to the target spin I [18] It isconsidered to be difficult to estimate neutron scattering amplitudes caused by the s middot I termbecause a complete set of resonance parameters is not known in most case at least not forbound-state resonances (En lt 0) [19] But the amplitudes caused by the s middot I term at resonantpeaks with strong spin selectivity could be estimated by using Eq (2) and the B-W formula[17 18] Fig 1 represents the estimated ∆σI and ωI of 129Xe as a function of En around a96 eV s-wave resonant peak (total angular momentum J = 1) This resonance selects neutrons

5th European Conference on Neutron Scattering IOP PublishingJournal of Physics Conference Series 340 (2012) 012037 doi1010881742-65963401012037

2

Figure 1 Estimated values of (A) spin dependent cross section ∆σI and (B) spin rotation frequencyωI at 96 eV s-wave resonant peak of 129Xe

with spin s = +12 based on a conservation of an angular momentum Fig 1 was calculated byusing resonance parameters of 129Xe based on the evaluated data in ENDFB-VII0 [20] and byassuming a 129Xe gas of 1 atm pressure It predicts that ∆σI and ωI depend on En strongly andincrease at the resonant peak Especially ωI exhibits a dispersion curve as a function of En andits maximum value is 4 times 105 radsec which corresponds to a pseudo-magnetic field H

lowast asymp 22mTesla We also calculated ωI of 131Xe at a 144 eV s-wave resonant peak (J = 2) and obtainedthe maximum value of ωI asymp 1 times 107 radsec which corresponds to H

lowast asymp 57 mTesla

3 Plan to measure neutron-nuclear spin correlation at BL10 in J-PARC

Figure 2 Experimental apparatus for detecting neutron polarizing ability of 129Xe

As the first step to detect the s middot I term we will measure a neutron polarizing ability at the96 eV s-wave resonant peak of 129Xe when unpolarized neutrons transmit through a polarizedXe target It has an advantage of realizing the measurement without a neutron spin polarizerthough its predicted value is smaller than that of a spin dependent cross section asymmetryAI = (σI+ minus σIminus)(σI+ + σIminus) where σI+ and σIminus denote the cross section with s parallel andanti-parallel to I

Our experimental apparatus is schematically shown in Fig 2 Our experiment will becarried out at a neutron beam line 10 (BL10) of the MLF in J-PARC [21] Pulsed neutronbeams supplied from a spallation neutron source transmit through collimators a polarized Xe

5th European Conference on Neutron Scattering IOP PublishingJournal of Physics Conference Series 340 (2012) 012037 doi1010881742-65963401012037

3

gas target a referential metal foil and are counted by a neutron detector placed at 14 m positionapart from the source The movable collimators placed at 7 m and 128 m positions are usedfor adjusting the neutron beam size and intensity The metal foil mounted on a goniometeris used in order to compensate time fluctuations of the detector by comparing resonant peakamplitudes between the foil and 129Xe measured with the same detector A ratio Rx betweenneutron transmissions with the target polarized and unpolarized is expressed as

Rx = cosh(NxσxlxρPx) (3)

where Nx σx lx Px denote a number density cross section thickness and polarization of targetnuclei x respectively Spin dependent parameters ρ of the target become 13 of 129Xe and 1 of3He Its neutron polarization is given as Pn =

radic

1 minus Rminus2x with Rx in Eq (3)

The Xe gas target is polarized by utilizing an in-situ SEOP system developed for a polarized3He neutron spin filter at J-PARC [22 23] It is designed compactly for mounting onexperimental tables in narrow areas of beam lines It consists of a diode laser (nLight VSA-100-796 DL) driven at an output power of sim47 W an external cavity for narrowing wave lengthof laser laser light transform optics and a solenoid coil of 20 cm in diameter and 30 cm longfor holding the target polarization A Xe gas of sim1 atm is contained in a cylindrical glass cellabout 3 cm in diameter and 5 minus 10 cm long with a N2 gas and a small amount of Rb Atomicspins of Rb are polarized by a resonance absorption of a circularly polarized laser light of a 795nm wave length and Xe nuclear spins are polarized by the spin exchange with the polarized Rbatoms The cell is mounted in an oven of 10 cm in diameter and 12 cm long The oven is madeof aluminum (Al) and placed at a center of the solenoid coil A temperature inside the oven iskept to 350 minus 450 Kelvin for obtaining a Rb vapor Around the cell a pickup coil and a drivecoil are mounted for the NMR measurement by an adiabatic fast passage (AFP) method TheAFP-NMR system is very useful for evaluating and monitoring a polarization PXe of the Xe cellby periodic measurements of NMR signals during beam experiments These components of theSEOP system are set in a box of 40 times 40 times 60 cm3 size for shielding laser light

We guess that practical values of ∆RXe = 1 minus RXe in Eq (3) will be 10minus3 minus 10minus2 Actually∆RXe is estimated about 0003 with a natural Xe gas of 15 atmmiddotcm thickness and 0012 with anenriched 129Xe gas of 10 atmmiddotcm thickness if a realizable PXe sim 02 is assumed For obtainingthe Xe gas cell with a practical thickness lXe and PXe it is important to know the pressuredependence of PXe and the effect of the relaxation due to collisions between Xe atom and thecell wall which is expressed by the wall relaxation time tw [24] Time evolution of a noble gasx polarization Px(t) is described as

Px(t) = PRbγse

γse + Γw(1 minus eminus(γse+Γw)t) = Px(1 minus eminusγgrt) (4)

where PRb γse Γw and γgr denote Rb atom polarization Rb-x spin exchange rate wall relaxationrate and growth rate of Px Px represents an attainable value of Px(t) and a inverse of Γw

corresponds to tw In the case of Xe it is known that PXe decreases with increasing a Xe atompressure because of a decrement of PRb by a increment of a Rb spin destruction rate due tothe effect of RbminusXe binary collisions While for reducing the wall relaxation some papershave reported to obtain long values of tw more than 20 minutes by coating inner surfaces ofborosilicate glass cells (Pyrex) with SurfaSil [24 25] For neutron experiments however itis required to select cell materials with their neutron cross sections as small as possible Weattempted to measure tw of the cell filled with a natural Xe gas of 26 atm pressure in a sphericalquartz glass of 3 cm diameter and obtained long tw more than 50 minutes This result suggeststhat quartz glass becomes a suitable material for the polarized Xe cell

5th European Conference on Neutron Scattering IOP PublishingJournal of Physics Conference Series 340 (2012) 012037 doi1010881742-65963401012037

4

Figure 3 Time of flight (TOF) spectrum of neutrons transmitting through unpolarized Xe cell

4 Feasibility test for measuring neutron polarizing ability of 129XeAccording to the apparatus in Fig 2 we have attempted to check the compensation method oftime fluctuations by comparing resonant peak amplitudes between the Xe cell and the referentialmetal foil In the test a cylindrical quartz cell of 5 cm long filled with a natural Xe gas of 3 atmpressure a silver (Ag) foil of 10 microm thickness mounted on a goniometer and a Li glass scintillatorof 1 mm thickness were used as the cell metal foil and neutron detector Fig 3 represents a timeof flight (TOF) spectrum of neutrons transmitting through the unpolarized Xe cell It suggeststhat the Xe cell and Ag foil are suitable thickness because the both resonant peaks at 96 eV of129Xe and 52 eV of 109Ag could be distinguished with enough peak amplitudes In Fig 2 aneffective thickness lAg of the Ag foil depends on a inclination angle θ of the foil relative to theneutron beam direction and changes by rotating the goniometer We attempted to demonstratea sensitivity of our system by detecting a slight change of the ratio ∆R(θ) = 1minus rres(θ)rres(0

)as a function of θ where rres(θ) represents the amplitude ratio between the 96 eV resonantpeak of 129Xe and the 52 eV resonant peak of 109Ag In the beam test during a few hours∆R(30) = 0060 plusmn 0014 and ∆R(20) = 0013 plusmn 0011 have been obtained This preliminaryresult suggests that the sensitivity corresponding to ∆RXe = 1 minus RXe in Eq (3) reaches tosim 10minus2 in statistical errors

Figure 4 Typical NMR amplitudes (A) VXe of 129Xe and (B) VHe of 3He observed at νres =50 kHz

For monitoring the polarization of the cell during beam experiments an AFP-NMR system

5th European Conference on Neutron Scattering IOP PublishingJournal of Physics Conference Series 340 (2012) 012037 doi1010881742-65963401012037

5

has been developed [26 27] It can work inside of the Al oven in our SEOP system and detectNMR signals both of 3He and 129Xe at a same resonant frequency νres For demonstrating anability of our NMR system the measurement of PHe of a polarized 3He filter with cold neutronshas been carried out with observing NMR signal amplitudes VHe of 3He periodically Accordingto Eq (3) PHe was determined from the ratio RHe between neutron transmissions with the 3Hefilter polarized and unpolarized In the test a cylindrical glass cell of 5 cm long containing in a3He gas of 32 atm was used as the 3He filter Fig 4 represents the typical NMR amplitudes VXe

of 129Xe and VHe of 3He observed at νres =50 kHz Fig 5 represents time evolution process ofPHe deduced from RHe and VHe from a start time (t = 0) of the optical pumping By fitting theobserved values with Eq (4) macrPHe = 026 plusmn 002 was obtained from Fig 5 (A) It correspondsto VHe asymp 183 mV deduced from Fig 5 (B) While γminus1

gr = 954 plusmn 019 hours was also obtained

as a growth time of Fig 5 (B) It was consistent with the γminus1gr of Fig 5 (A) in statistical errors

We guess that the observed PHe might be small due to the lack of adjustment of the laser lighttransform optics because PHe ge 06 is obtained by using our SEOP system usually By usingthe correlation between PHe and VHe obtained from this test the polarization PXe of the Xecell can be deduced from the NMR amplitude VXe Actually we could obtain about 001 as PXe

corresponding to the amplitude VXe in Fig 4 (A)

Figure 5 Time evolutions of (A) PHe deduced from RHe and (B) VHe of NMR as a function of time tfrom start time (t = 0) of the optical pumping

5 Summary

We mentioned interest in the measurement of the s middot I term as a function of En for verificationof the NOPT and reported the experimental plan and feasibility tests for detecting the neutronpolarizing ability at the 96 eV resonant peak of 129Xe Although the statistical accuracy of∆RXe is dominated by the counting capability of our system at the present it will be achievedto sim 10minus3 by improving the detector and data acquisition system For obtaining the practicallXe and PXe we will attempt to optimize conditions of the SEOP system and prepare a Xe cellfilled with an enriched 129Xe gas of a low pressure in order to avoid a decrement of PXe withincreasing a Xe pressure For the study on the s middot I term in detail however the measurementsof AI and ωI with polarized neutron beams are indispensable Actually by using Pn = 05polarized neutron beams AI asymp 0038 is expected with a natural Xe cell of PXe = 02 and 15atmmiddotcm thickness though ∆RXe asymp 0003 is estimated with the same cell For realizing thesemeasurements developments of a polarized proton filter and a high pressure 3He filter will bedesirable as neutron spin filters at the MLF in J-PARC [28]

5th European Conference on Neutron Scattering IOP PublishingJournal of Physics Conference Series 340 (2012) 012037 doi1010881742-65963401012037

6

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the staffs of the MLF at J-PARC for their useful help and suggestions Thisresearch has been partly supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (No22604005) andthe Quantum Beam Fundamental Development Program MEXT

References

[1] B Larson et al Phys Rev A 44 (1991) 3108[2] A Yoshimi et al Phys Lett A 304 (2002) 13[3] IC Ruset et al Phys Rev Lett 96 (2006) 053002[4] AD Buckingham Chem Phys Lett 371 (2003) 517[5] VR Skoy J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol 110 (2005) 471[6] L Stodolsky Phys Lett B 172 (1986) 5[7] PK Kabir et al Phys Rev D 25 (1982) 25[8] R Balzer et al Phys Rev C 30 (1984) 1409[9] Y Masuda et al Nucl Phys A 478 (1988) 737

[10] VW Yuan et al Phys Rev A 44 (1991) 2178[11] HM Shimizu et al Nucl Phys A 552 (1993) 293[12] OP Sushkov et al JETP Lett A 32 (1980) 352[13] T Haseyama et al Phys Lett B 5341-4 (2002) 39[14] EA Kolomensky et al Phys Lett B 107 ( 1981) 272[15] B Heckel et al Phys Rev C 29 (1984) 2389[16] L Stodolsky Nucl Phys B 197 (1982) 213[17] VE Bunakov et al Phys Lett B 429 (1998) 7[18] VP Gudkov Physics Repors 212 No2 (1992) 77[19] L Koester et al Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 49 (1991) 65[20] ML Chadwick et al Nuclear Data Sheets 107 (2006) 2931 lthttpt2lanlgovdataneutron7htmlgt[21] K Oikawa et al Nuclear Instr and methods A 589 (2008) 310[22] H Kira et al Physica B 406 (2011) 2433[23] T Oku et al ldquoDevelopments of In-Situ SEOP Polarized 3He Neutron Spin Filter at J-PARCrdquo in these

proceedings[24] H Sato et al Nuclear Instr and methods A 402 (1998) 241[25] X Zeng et al Phys Lett A 96 (1983) 191[26] T Ino et al rdquoA compact SEOP 3He neutron spin filter with AFP NMRrdquo in these proceedings[27] T Ino et al Physica B 404 (2009) 2667[28] K Sakai et al Nuclear Instr and methods A 402 (1998) 244

5th European Conference on Neutron Scattering IOP PublishingJournal of Physics Conference Series 340 (2012) 012037 doi1010881742-65963401012037

7

2 Evaluation of neutron-nuclear spin correlation based on the NOPT

According to the NOPT a propagation of low energy neutron through target material isdescribed by a forward scattering amplitude f

f = A + Bs middot I + Cs middot k + Ds middot (k times I) (1)

where s I and k denote unit vectors representing directions of a neutron spin a target nuclearspin and a incident neutron momentum respectively [6 7] The complex coefficients A B C Dare described as a function of a neutron energy En though they are considered to be constantbelow a thermal neutron energy A and B represent parity conserving (PC) amplitudes causedby strong interactions and C and D represent parity non-conserving (PNC) amplitudes causedby weak interactions In Eq (1) imaginary parts of the s middot I s middot k and s middot (k times I) terms induceneutron spin s dependent cross sections ∆σI ∆σk and ∆σktimesI relative to directions of I k andk times I while their real parts induce neutron spin rotations φI φk and φktimesI around axes of I k

and k times IObservations of the PNC amplitudes are important for study of neutron fundamental physics

The PNC effects caused by the s middot k term have been estimated about 10minus7 and verified byobserving helicity asymmetries Ak of the spin dependent cross sections ∆σk with proton-protonscatterings [8] However they have been found to be enhanced in neutron-nucleus scatteringsespecially values of Ak at p-wave resonances of 139La 131Xe and so on have reached up to10minus2 minus 10minus1 [9 10 11] These enhancements are explained by a model based on a interferencebetween the p-wave and its neighboring s-wave resonances [12] According to the model Ak

and φk are described as a function of En with a parity mixing matrix element xW and Briet-Wigner (B-W) resonance formula In particular both Ak and φk of 139La have been observedwith cold and epithermal neutrons and they were consistent with predictions deduced from themodel [11 13 14 15] The result suggests that the NOPT on the s middot k term is valid up toan epithermal neutron energy region But for verification of the NOPT based on Eq (1) itbecomes necessary to measure the quantities caused by the s middot I and s middot (k times I) terms withpolarized targets

The enhancement of the PNC effect at the p-wave resonance is considered to be useful fordetecting a time reversal non-conserving (TRNC) effect caused by the smiddot(ktimesI) term [7 16] Forrealizing to measure the TRNC effect it becomes a key technique to reduce an affect of neutronspin rotation frequency ωI and ωH caused by the s middot I term and an external magnetic field H

for holding target polarizations where ωI(= dφIdt) and ωH are known as a pseudo-magneticfrequency and a Larmor precession frequency Especially it is important to comprehend ωI as afunction of En because ωI was predicted to increase in vicinities of resonant peaks [17 18]

We attempted to evaluate measurable quantities of 129Xe(I = 12) and 131Xe(I = 32)caused by the s middot I term As the PNC effects are normally much smaller than the PC effectsEq (1) is approximately described as f asymp A + Bs middot I and ∆σI and ωI are given as

∆σI =4π

kIm(f+ minus fminus) ωI = minus

2πNI h

mnRe(f+ minus fminus) (2)

where NI and mn denote a number density of target and a neutron mass and f+(fminus) is theamplitude f with the neutron spin s parallel (anti-parallel) to the target spin I [18] It isconsidered to be difficult to estimate neutron scattering amplitudes caused by the s middot I termbecause a complete set of resonance parameters is not known in most case at least not forbound-state resonances (En lt 0) [19] But the amplitudes caused by the s middot I term at resonantpeaks with strong spin selectivity could be estimated by using Eq (2) and the B-W formula[17 18] Fig 1 represents the estimated ∆σI and ωI of 129Xe as a function of En around a96 eV s-wave resonant peak (total angular momentum J = 1) This resonance selects neutrons

5th European Conference on Neutron Scattering IOP PublishingJournal of Physics Conference Series 340 (2012) 012037 doi1010881742-65963401012037

2

Figure 1 Estimated values of (A) spin dependent cross section ∆σI and (B) spin rotation frequencyωI at 96 eV s-wave resonant peak of 129Xe

with spin s = +12 based on a conservation of an angular momentum Fig 1 was calculated byusing resonance parameters of 129Xe based on the evaluated data in ENDFB-VII0 [20] and byassuming a 129Xe gas of 1 atm pressure It predicts that ∆σI and ωI depend on En strongly andincrease at the resonant peak Especially ωI exhibits a dispersion curve as a function of En andits maximum value is 4 times 105 radsec which corresponds to a pseudo-magnetic field H

lowast asymp 22mTesla We also calculated ωI of 131Xe at a 144 eV s-wave resonant peak (J = 2) and obtainedthe maximum value of ωI asymp 1 times 107 radsec which corresponds to H

lowast asymp 57 mTesla

3 Plan to measure neutron-nuclear spin correlation at BL10 in J-PARC

Figure 2 Experimental apparatus for detecting neutron polarizing ability of 129Xe

As the first step to detect the s middot I term we will measure a neutron polarizing ability at the96 eV s-wave resonant peak of 129Xe when unpolarized neutrons transmit through a polarizedXe target It has an advantage of realizing the measurement without a neutron spin polarizerthough its predicted value is smaller than that of a spin dependent cross section asymmetryAI = (σI+ minus σIminus)(σI+ + σIminus) where σI+ and σIminus denote the cross section with s parallel andanti-parallel to I

Our experimental apparatus is schematically shown in Fig 2 Our experiment will becarried out at a neutron beam line 10 (BL10) of the MLF in J-PARC [21] Pulsed neutronbeams supplied from a spallation neutron source transmit through collimators a polarized Xe

5th European Conference on Neutron Scattering IOP PublishingJournal of Physics Conference Series 340 (2012) 012037 doi1010881742-65963401012037

3

gas target a referential metal foil and are counted by a neutron detector placed at 14 m positionapart from the source The movable collimators placed at 7 m and 128 m positions are usedfor adjusting the neutron beam size and intensity The metal foil mounted on a goniometeris used in order to compensate time fluctuations of the detector by comparing resonant peakamplitudes between the foil and 129Xe measured with the same detector A ratio Rx betweenneutron transmissions with the target polarized and unpolarized is expressed as

Rx = cosh(NxσxlxρPx) (3)

where Nx σx lx Px denote a number density cross section thickness and polarization of targetnuclei x respectively Spin dependent parameters ρ of the target become 13 of 129Xe and 1 of3He Its neutron polarization is given as Pn =

radic

1 minus Rminus2x with Rx in Eq (3)

The Xe gas target is polarized by utilizing an in-situ SEOP system developed for a polarized3He neutron spin filter at J-PARC [22 23] It is designed compactly for mounting onexperimental tables in narrow areas of beam lines It consists of a diode laser (nLight VSA-100-796 DL) driven at an output power of sim47 W an external cavity for narrowing wave lengthof laser laser light transform optics and a solenoid coil of 20 cm in diameter and 30 cm longfor holding the target polarization A Xe gas of sim1 atm is contained in a cylindrical glass cellabout 3 cm in diameter and 5 minus 10 cm long with a N2 gas and a small amount of Rb Atomicspins of Rb are polarized by a resonance absorption of a circularly polarized laser light of a 795nm wave length and Xe nuclear spins are polarized by the spin exchange with the polarized Rbatoms The cell is mounted in an oven of 10 cm in diameter and 12 cm long The oven is madeof aluminum (Al) and placed at a center of the solenoid coil A temperature inside the oven iskept to 350 minus 450 Kelvin for obtaining a Rb vapor Around the cell a pickup coil and a drivecoil are mounted for the NMR measurement by an adiabatic fast passage (AFP) method TheAFP-NMR system is very useful for evaluating and monitoring a polarization PXe of the Xe cellby periodic measurements of NMR signals during beam experiments These components of theSEOP system are set in a box of 40 times 40 times 60 cm3 size for shielding laser light

We guess that practical values of ∆RXe = 1 minus RXe in Eq (3) will be 10minus3 minus 10minus2 Actually∆RXe is estimated about 0003 with a natural Xe gas of 15 atmmiddotcm thickness and 0012 with anenriched 129Xe gas of 10 atmmiddotcm thickness if a realizable PXe sim 02 is assumed For obtainingthe Xe gas cell with a practical thickness lXe and PXe it is important to know the pressuredependence of PXe and the effect of the relaxation due to collisions between Xe atom and thecell wall which is expressed by the wall relaxation time tw [24] Time evolution of a noble gasx polarization Px(t) is described as

Px(t) = PRbγse

γse + Γw(1 minus eminus(γse+Γw)t) = Px(1 minus eminusγgrt) (4)

where PRb γse Γw and γgr denote Rb atom polarization Rb-x spin exchange rate wall relaxationrate and growth rate of Px Px represents an attainable value of Px(t) and a inverse of Γw

corresponds to tw In the case of Xe it is known that PXe decreases with increasing a Xe atompressure because of a decrement of PRb by a increment of a Rb spin destruction rate due tothe effect of RbminusXe binary collisions While for reducing the wall relaxation some papershave reported to obtain long values of tw more than 20 minutes by coating inner surfaces ofborosilicate glass cells (Pyrex) with SurfaSil [24 25] For neutron experiments however itis required to select cell materials with their neutron cross sections as small as possible Weattempted to measure tw of the cell filled with a natural Xe gas of 26 atm pressure in a sphericalquartz glass of 3 cm diameter and obtained long tw more than 50 minutes This result suggeststhat quartz glass becomes a suitable material for the polarized Xe cell

5th European Conference on Neutron Scattering IOP PublishingJournal of Physics Conference Series 340 (2012) 012037 doi1010881742-65963401012037

4

Figure 3 Time of flight (TOF) spectrum of neutrons transmitting through unpolarized Xe cell

4 Feasibility test for measuring neutron polarizing ability of 129XeAccording to the apparatus in Fig 2 we have attempted to check the compensation method oftime fluctuations by comparing resonant peak amplitudes between the Xe cell and the referentialmetal foil In the test a cylindrical quartz cell of 5 cm long filled with a natural Xe gas of 3 atmpressure a silver (Ag) foil of 10 microm thickness mounted on a goniometer and a Li glass scintillatorof 1 mm thickness were used as the cell metal foil and neutron detector Fig 3 represents a timeof flight (TOF) spectrum of neutrons transmitting through the unpolarized Xe cell It suggeststhat the Xe cell and Ag foil are suitable thickness because the both resonant peaks at 96 eV of129Xe and 52 eV of 109Ag could be distinguished with enough peak amplitudes In Fig 2 aneffective thickness lAg of the Ag foil depends on a inclination angle θ of the foil relative to theneutron beam direction and changes by rotating the goniometer We attempted to demonstratea sensitivity of our system by detecting a slight change of the ratio ∆R(θ) = 1minus rres(θ)rres(0

)as a function of θ where rres(θ) represents the amplitude ratio between the 96 eV resonantpeak of 129Xe and the 52 eV resonant peak of 109Ag In the beam test during a few hours∆R(30) = 0060 plusmn 0014 and ∆R(20) = 0013 plusmn 0011 have been obtained This preliminaryresult suggests that the sensitivity corresponding to ∆RXe = 1 minus RXe in Eq (3) reaches tosim 10minus2 in statistical errors

Figure 4 Typical NMR amplitudes (A) VXe of 129Xe and (B) VHe of 3He observed at νres =50 kHz

For monitoring the polarization of the cell during beam experiments an AFP-NMR system

5th European Conference on Neutron Scattering IOP PublishingJournal of Physics Conference Series 340 (2012) 012037 doi1010881742-65963401012037

5

has been developed [26 27] It can work inside of the Al oven in our SEOP system and detectNMR signals both of 3He and 129Xe at a same resonant frequency νres For demonstrating anability of our NMR system the measurement of PHe of a polarized 3He filter with cold neutronshas been carried out with observing NMR signal amplitudes VHe of 3He periodically Accordingto Eq (3) PHe was determined from the ratio RHe between neutron transmissions with the 3Hefilter polarized and unpolarized In the test a cylindrical glass cell of 5 cm long containing in a3He gas of 32 atm was used as the 3He filter Fig 4 represents the typical NMR amplitudes VXe

of 129Xe and VHe of 3He observed at νres =50 kHz Fig 5 represents time evolution process ofPHe deduced from RHe and VHe from a start time (t = 0) of the optical pumping By fitting theobserved values with Eq (4) macrPHe = 026 plusmn 002 was obtained from Fig 5 (A) It correspondsto VHe asymp 183 mV deduced from Fig 5 (B) While γminus1

gr = 954 plusmn 019 hours was also obtained

as a growth time of Fig 5 (B) It was consistent with the γminus1gr of Fig 5 (A) in statistical errors

We guess that the observed PHe might be small due to the lack of adjustment of the laser lighttransform optics because PHe ge 06 is obtained by using our SEOP system usually By usingthe correlation between PHe and VHe obtained from this test the polarization PXe of the Xecell can be deduced from the NMR amplitude VXe Actually we could obtain about 001 as PXe

corresponding to the amplitude VXe in Fig 4 (A)

Figure 5 Time evolutions of (A) PHe deduced from RHe and (B) VHe of NMR as a function of time tfrom start time (t = 0) of the optical pumping

5 Summary

We mentioned interest in the measurement of the s middot I term as a function of En for verificationof the NOPT and reported the experimental plan and feasibility tests for detecting the neutronpolarizing ability at the 96 eV resonant peak of 129Xe Although the statistical accuracy of∆RXe is dominated by the counting capability of our system at the present it will be achievedto sim 10minus3 by improving the detector and data acquisition system For obtaining the practicallXe and PXe we will attempt to optimize conditions of the SEOP system and prepare a Xe cellfilled with an enriched 129Xe gas of a low pressure in order to avoid a decrement of PXe withincreasing a Xe pressure For the study on the s middot I term in detail however the measurementsof AI and ωI with polarized neutron beams are indispensable Actually by using Pn = 05polarized neutron beams AI asymp 0038 is expected with a natural Xe cell of PXe = 02 and 15atmmiddotcm thickness though ∆RXe asymp 0003 is estimated with the same cell For realizing thesemeasurements developments of a polarized proton filter and a high pressure 3He filter will bedesirable as neutron spin filters at the MLF in J-PARC [28]

5th European Conference on Neutron Scattering IOP PublishingJournal of Physics Conference Series 340 (2012) 012037 doi1010881742-65963401012037

6

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the staffs of the MLF at J-PARC for their useful help and suggestions Thisresearch has been partly supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (No22604005) andthe Quantum Beam Fundamental Development Program MEXT

References

[1] B Larson et al Phys Rev A 44 (1991) 3108[2] A Yoshimi et al Phys Lett A 304 (2002) 13[3] IC Ruset et al Phys Rev Lett 96 (2006) 053002[4] AD Buckingham Chem Phys Lett 371 (2003) 517[5] VR Skoy J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol 110 (2005) 471[6] L Stodolsky Phys Lett B 172 (1986) 5[7] PK Kabir et al Phys Rev D 25 (1982) 25[8] R Balzer et al Phys Rev C 30 (1984) 1409[9] Y Masuda et al Nucl Phys A 478 (1988) 737

[10] VW Yuan et al Phys Rev A 44 (1991) 2178[11] HM Shimizu et al Nucl Phys A 552 (1993) 293[12] OP Sushkov et al JETP Lett A 32 (1980) 352[13] T Haseyama et al Phys Lett B 5341-4 (2002) 39[14] EA Kolomensky et al Phys Lett B 107 ( 1981) 272[15] B Heckel et al Phys Rev C 29 (1984) 2389[16] L Stodolsky Nucl Phys B 197 (1982) 213[17] VE Bunakov et al Phys Lett B 429 (1998) 7[18] VP Gudkov Physics Repors 212 No2 (1992) 77[19] L Koester et al Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 49 (1991) 65[20] ML Chadwick et al Nuclear Data Sheets 107 (2006) 2931 lthttpt2lanlgovdataneutron7htmlgt[21] K Oikawa et al Nuclear Instr and methods A 589 (2008) 310[22] H Kira et al Physica B 406 (2011) 2433[23] T Oku et al ldquoDevelopments of In-Situ SEOP Polarized 3He Neutron Spin Filter at J-PARCrdquo in these

proceedings[24] H Sato et al Nuclear Instr and methods A 402 (1998) 241[25] X Zeng et al Phys Lett A 96 (1983) 191[26] T Ino et al rdquoA compact SEOP 3He neutron spin filter with AFP NMRrdquo in these proceedings[27] T Ino et al Physica B 404 (2009) 2667[28] K Sakai et al Nuclear Instr and methods A 402 (1998) 244

5th European Conference on Neutron Scattering IOP PublishingJournal of Physics Conference Series 340 (2012) 012037 doi1010881742-65963401012037

7

Figure 1 Estimated values of (A) spin dependent cross section ∆σI and (B) spin rotation frequencyωI at 96 eV s-wave resonant peak of 129Xe

with spin s = +12 based on a conservation of an angular momentum Fig 1 was calculated byusing resonance parameters of 129Xe based on the evaluated data in ENDFB-VII0 [20] and byassuming a 129Xe gas of 1 atm pressure It predicts that ∆σI and ωI depend on En strongly andincrease at the resonant peak Especially ωI exhibits a dispersion curve as a function of En andits maximum value is 4 times 105 radsec which corresponds to a pseudo-magnetic field H

lowast asymp 22mTesla We also calculated ωI of 131Xe at a 144 eV s-wave resonant peak (J = 2) and obtainedthe maximum value of ωI asymp 1 times 107 radsec which corresponds to H

lowast asymp 57 mTesla

3 Plan to measure neutron-nuclear spin correlation at BL10 in J-PARC

Figure 2 Experimental apparatus for detecting neutron polarizing ability of 129Xe

As the first step to detect the s middot I term we will measure a neutron polarizing ability at the96 eV s-wave resonant peak of 129Xe when unpolarized neutrons transmit through a polarizedXe target It has an advantage of realizing the measurement without a neutron spin polarizerthough its predicted value is smaller than that of a spin dependent cross section asymmetryAI = (σI+ minus σIminus)(σI+ + σIminus) where σI+ and σIminus denote the cross section with s parallel andanti-parallel to I

Our experimental apparatus is schematically shown in Fig 2 Our experiment will becarried out at a neutron beam line 10 (BL10) of the MLF in J-PARC [21] Pulsed neutronbeams supplied from a spallation neutron source transmit through collimators a polarized Xe

5th European Conference on Neutron Scattering IOP PublishingJournal of Physics Conference Series 340 (2012) 012037 doi1010881742-65963401012037

3

gas target a referential metal foil and are counted by a neutron detector placed at 14 m positionapart from the source The movable collimators placed at 7 m and 128 m positions are usedfor adjusting the neutron beam size and intensity The metal foil mounted on a goniometeris used in order to compensate time fluctuations of the detector by comparing resonant peakamplitudes between the foil and 129Xe measured with the same detector A ratio Rx betweenneutron transmissions with the target polarized and unpolarized is expressed as

Rx = cosh(NxσxlxρPx) (3)

where Nx σx lx Px denote a number density cross section thickness and polarization of targetnuclei x respectively Spin dependent parameters ρ of the target become 13 of 129Xe and 1 of3He Its neutron polarization is given as Pn =

radic

1 minus Rminus2x with Rx in Eq (3)

The Xe gas target is polarized by utilizing an in-situ SEOP system developed for a polarized3He neutron spin filter at J-PARC [22 23] It is designed compactly for mounting onexperimental tables in narrow areas of beam lines It consists of a diode laser (nLight VSA-100-796 DL) driven at an output power of sim47 W an external cavity for narrowing wave lengthof laser laser light transform optics and a solenoid coil of 20 cm in diameter and 30 cm longfor holding the target polarization A Xe gas of sim1 atm is contained in a cylindrical glass cellabout 3 cm in diameter and 5 minus 10 cm long with a N2 gas and a small amount of Rb Atomicspins of Rb are polarized by a resonance absorption of a circularly polarized laser light of a 795nm wave length and Xe nuclear spins are polarized by the spin exchange with the polarized Rbatoms The cell is mounted in an oven of 10 cm in diameter and 12 cm long The oven is madeof aluminum (Al) and placed at a center of the solenoid coil A temperature inside the oven iskept to 350 minus 450 Kelvin for obtaining a Rb vapor Around the cell a pickup coil and a drivecoil are mounted for the NMR measurement by an adiabatic fast passage (AFP) method TheAFP-NMR system is very useful for evaluating and monitoring a polarization PXe of the Xe cellby periodic measurements of NMR signals during beam experiments These components of theSEOP system are set in a box of 40 times 40 times 60 cm3 size for shielding laser light

We guess that practical values of ∆RXe = 1 minus RXe in Eq (3) will be 10minus3 minus 10minus2 Actually∆RXe is estimated about 0003 with a natural Xe gas of 15 atmmiddotcm thickness and 0012 with anenriched 129Xe gas of 10 atmmiddotcm thickness if a realizable PXe sim 02 is assumed For obtainingthe Xe gas cell with a practical thickness lXe and PXe it is important to know the pressuredependence of PXe and the effect of the relaxation due to collisions between Xe atom and thecell wall which is expressed by the wall relaxation time tw [24] Time evolution of a noble gasx polarization Px(t) is described as

Px(t) = PRbγse

γse + Γw(1 minus eminus(γse+Γw)t) = Px(1 minus eminusγgrt) (4)

where PRb γse Γw and γgr denote Rb atom polarization Rb-x spin exchange rate wall relaxationrate and growth rate of Px Px represents an attainable value of Px(t) and a inverse of Γw

corresponds to tw In the case of Xe it is known that PXe decreases with increasing a Xe atompressure because of a decrement of PRb by a increment of a Rb spin destruction rate due tothe effect of RbminusXe binary collisions While for reducing the wall relaxation some papershave reported to obtain long values of tw more than 20 minutes by coating inner surfaces ofborosilicate glass cells (Pyrex) with SurfaSil [24 25] For neutron experiments however itis required to select cell materials with their neutron cross sections as small as possible Weattempted to measure tw of the cell filled with a natural Xe gas of 26 atm pressure in a sphericalquartz glass of 3 cm diameter and obtained long tw more than 50 minutes This result suggeststhat quartz glass becomes a suitable material for the polarized Xe cell

5th European Conference on Neutron Scattering IOP PublishingJournal of Physics Conference Series 340 (2012) 012037 doi1010881742-65963401012037

4

Figure 3 Time of flight (TOF) spectrum of neutrons transmitting through unpolarized Xe cell

4 Feasibility test for measuring neutron polarizing ability of 129XeAccording to the apparatus in Fig 2 we have attempted to check the compensation method oftime fluctuations by comparing resonant peak amplitudes between the Xe cell and the referentialmetal foil In the test a cylindrical quartz cell of 5 cm long filled with a natural Xe gas of 3 atmpressure a silver (Ag) foil of 10 microm thickness mounted on a goniometer and a Li glass scintillatorof 1 mm thickness were used as the cell metal foil and neutron detector Fig 3 represents a timeof flight (TOF) spectrum of neutrons transmitting through the unpolarized Xe cell It suggeststhat the Xe cell and Ag foil are suitable thickness because the both resonant peaks at 96 eV of129Xe and 52 eV of 109Ag could be distinguished with enough peak amplitudes In Fig 2 aneffective thickness lAg of the Ag foil depends on a inclination angle θ of the foil relative to theneutron beam direction and changes by rotating the goniometer We attempted to demonstratea sensitivity of our system by detecting a slight change of the ratio ∆R(θ) = 1minus rres(θ)rres(0

)as a function of θ where rres(θ) represents the amplitude ratio between the 96 eV resonantpeak of 129Xe and the 52 eV resonant peak of 109Ag In the beam test during a few hours∆R(30) = 0060 plusmn 0014 and ∆R(20) = 0013 plusmn 0011 have been obtained This preliminaryresult suggests that the sensitivity corresponding to ∆RXe = 1 minus RXe in Eq (3) reaches tosim 10minus2 in statistical errors

Figure 4 Typical NMR amplitudes (A) VXe of 129Xe and (B) VHe of 3He observed at νres =50 kHz

For monitoring the polarization of the cell during beam experiments an AFP-NMR system

5th European Conference on Neutron Scattering IOP PublishingJournal of Physics Conference Series 340 (2012) 012037 doi1010881742-65963401012037

5

has been developed [26 27] It can work inside of the Al oven in our SEOP system and detectNMR signals both of 3He and 129Xe at a same resonant frequency νres For demonstrating anability of our NMR system the measurement of PHe of a polarized 3He filter with cold neutronshas been carried out with observing NMR signal amplitudes VHe of 3He periodically Accordingto Eq (3) PHe was determined from the ratio RHe between neutron transmissions with the 3Hefilter polarized and unpolarized In the test a cylindrical glass cell of 5 cm long containing in a3He gas of 32 atm was used as the 3He filter Fig 4 represents the typical NMR amplitudes VXe

of 129Xe and VHe of 3He observed at νres =50 kHz Fig 5 represents time evolution process ofPHe deduced from RHe and VHe from a start time (t = 0) of the optical pumping By fitting theobserved values with Eq (4) macrPHe = 026 plusmn 002 was obtained from Fig 5 (A) It correspondsto VHe asymp 183 mV deduced from Fig 5 (B) While γminus1

gr = 954 plusmn 019 hours was also obtained

as a growth time of Fig 5 (B) It was consistent with the γminus1gr of Fig 5 (A) in statistical errors

We guess that the observed PHe might be small due to the lack of adjustment of the laser lighttransform optics because PHe ge 06 is obtained by using our SEOP system usually By usingthe correlation between PHe and VHe obtained from this test the polarization PXe of the Xecell can be deduced from the NMR amplitude VXe Actually we could obtain about 001 as PXe

corresponding to the amplitude VXe in Fig 4 (A)

Figure 5 Time evolutions of (A) PHe deduced from RHe and (B) VHe of NMR as a function of time tfrom start time (t = 0) of the optical pumping

5 Summary

We mentioned interest in the measurement of the s middot I term as a function of En for verificationof the NOPT and reported the experimental plan and feasibility tests for detecting the neutronpolarizing ability at the 96 eV resonant peak of 129Xe Although the statistical accuracy of∆RXe is dominated by the counting capability of our system at the present it will be achievedto sim 10minus3 by improving the detector and data acquisition system For obtaining the practicallXe and PXe we will attempt to optimize conditions of the SEOP system and prepare a Xe cellfilled with an enriched 129Xe gas of a low pressure in order to avoid a decrement of PXe withincreasing a Xe pressure For the study on the s middot I term in detail however the measurementsof AI and ωI with polarized neutron beams are indispensable Actually by using Pn = 05polarized neutron beams AI asymp 0038 is expected with a natural Xe cell of PXe = 02 and 15atmmiddotcm thickness though ∆RXe asymp 0003 is estimated with the same cell For realizing thesemeasurements developments of a polarized proton filter and a high pressure 3He filter will bedesirable as neutron spin filters at the MLF in J-PARC [28]

5th European Conference on Neutron Scattering IOP PublishingJournal of Physics Conference Series 340 (2012) 012037 doi1010881742-65963401012037

6

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the staffs of the MLF at J-PARC for their useful help and suggestions Thisresearch has been partly supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (No22604005) andthe Quantum Beam Fundamental Development Program MEXT

References

[1] B Larson et al Phys Rev A 44 (1991) 3108[2] A Yoshimi et al Phys Lett A 304 (2002) 13[3] IC Ruset et al Phys Rev Lett 96 (2006) 053002[4] AD Buckingham Chem Phys Lett 371 (2003) 517[5] VR Skoy J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol 110 (2005) 471[6] L Stodolsky Phys Lett B 172 (1986) 5[7] PK Kabir et al Phys Rev D 25 (1982) 25[8] R Balzer et al Phys Rev C 30 (1984) 1409[9] Y Masuda et al Nucl Phys A 478 (1988) 737

[10] VW Yuan et al Phys Rev A 44 (1991) 2178[11] HM Shimizu et al Nucl Phys A 552 (1993) 293[12] OP Sushkov et al JETP Lett A 32 (1980) 352[13] T Haseyama et al Phys Lett B 5341-4 (2002) 39[14] EA Kolomensky et al Phys Lett B 107 ( 1981) 272[15] B Heckel et al Phys Rev C 29 (1984) 2389[16] L Stodolsky Nucl Phys B 197 (1982) 213[17] VE Bunakov et al Phys Lett B 429 (1998) 7[18] VP Gudkov Physics Repors 212 No2 (1992) 77[19] L Koester et al Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 49 (1991) 65[20] ML Chadwick et al Nuclear Data Sheets 107 (2006) 2931 lthttpt2lanlgovdataneutron7htmlgt[21] K Oikawa et al Nuclear Instr and methods A 589 (2008) 310[22] H Kira et al Physica B 406 (2011) 2433[23] T Oku et al ldquoDevelopments of In-Situ SEOP Polarized 3He Neutron Spin Filter at J-PARCrdquo in these

proceedings[24] H Sato et al Nuclear Instr and methods A 402 (1998) 241[25] X Zeng et al Phys Lett A 96 (1983) 191[26] T Ino et al rdquoA compact SEOP 3He neutron spin filter with AFP NMRrdquo in these proceedings[27] T Ino et al Physica B 404 (2009) 2667[28] K Sakai et al Nuclear Instr and methods A 402 (1998) 244

5th European Conference on Neutron Scattering IOP PublishingJournal of Physics Conference Series 340 (2012) 012037 doi1010881742-65963401012037

7

gas target a referential metal foil and are counted by a neutron detector placed at 14 m positionapart from the source The movable collimators placed at 7 m and 128 m positions are usedfor adjusting the neutron beam size and intensity The metal foil mounted on a goniometeris used in order to compensate time fluctuations of the detector by comparing resonant peakamplitudes between the foil and 129Xe measured with the same detector A ratio Rx betweenneutron transmissions with the target polarized and unpolarized is expressed as

Rx = cosh(NxσxlxρPx) (3)

where Nx σx lx Px denote a number density cross section thickness and polarization of targetnuclei x respectively Spin dependent parameters ρ of the target become 13 of 129Xe and 1 of3He Its neutron polarization is given as Pn =

radic

1 minus Rminus2x with Rx in Eq (3)

The Xe gas target is polarized by utilizing an in-situ SEOP system developed for a polarized3He neutron spin filter at J-PARC [22 23] It is designed compactly for mounting onexperimental tables in narrow areas of beam lines It consists of a diode laser (nLight VSA-100-796 DL) driven at an output power of sim47 W an external cavity for narrowing wave lengthof laser laser light transform optics and a solenoid coil of 20 cm in diameter and 30 cm longfor holding the target polarization A Xe gas of sim1 atm is contained in a cylindrical glass cellabout 3 cm in diameter and 5 minus 10 cm long with a N2 gas and a small amount of Rb Atomicspins of Rb are polarized by a resonance absorption of a circularly polarized laser light of a 795nm wave length and Xe nuclear spins are polarized by the spin exchange with the polarized Rbatoms The cell is mounted in an oven of 10 cm in diameter and 12 cm long The oven is madeof aluminum (Al) and placed at a center of the solenoid coil A temperature inside the oven iskept to 350 minus 450 Kelvin for obtaining a Rb vapor Around the cell a pickup coil and a drivecoil are mounted for the NMR measurement by an adiabatic fast passage (AFP) method TheAFP-NMR system is very useful for evaluating and monitoring a polarization PXe of the Xe cellby periodic measurements of NMR signals during beam experiments These components of theSEOP system are set in a box of 40 times 40 times 60 cm3 size for shielding laser light

We guess that practical values of ∆RXe = 1 minus RXe in Eq (3) will be 10minus3 minus 10minus2 Actually∆RXe is estimated about 0003 with a natural Xe gas of 15 atmmiddotcm thickness and 0012 with anenriched 129Xe gas of 10 atmmiddotcm thickness if a realizable PXe sim 02 is assumed For obtainingthe Xe gas cell with a practical thickness lXe and PXe it is important to know the pressuredependence of PXe and the effect of the relaxation due to collisions between Xe atom and thecell wall which is expressed by the wall relaxation time tw [24] Time evolution of a noble gasx polarization Px(t) is described as

Px(t) = PRbγse

γse + Γw(1 minus eminus(γse+Γw)t) = Px(1 minus eminusγgrt) (4)

where PRb γse Γw and γgr denote Rb atom polarization Rb-x spin exchange rate wall relaxationrate and growth rate of Px Px represents an attainable value of Px(t) and a inverse of Γw

corresponds to tw In the case of Xe it is known that PXe decreases with increasing a Xe atompressure because of a decrement of PRb by a increment of a Rb spin destruction rate due tothe effect of RbminusXe binary collisions While for reducing the wall relaxation some papershave reported to obtain long values of tw more than 20 minutes by coating inner surfaces ofborosilicate glass cells (Pyrex) with SurfaSil [24 25] For neutron experiments however itis required to select cell materials with their neutron cross sections as small as possible Weattempted to measure tw of the cell filled with a natural Xe gas of 26 atm pressure in a sphericalquartz glass of 3 cm diameter and obtained long tw more than 50 minutes This result suggeststhat quartz glass becomes a suitable material for the polarized Xe cell

5th European Conference on Neutron Scattering IOP PublishingJournal of Physics Conference Series 340 (2012) 012037 doi1010881742-65963401012037

4

Figure 3 Time of flight (TOF) spectrum of neutrons transmitting through unpolarized Xe cell

4 Feasibility test for measuring neutron polarizing ability of 129XeAccording to the apparatus in Fig 2 we have attempted to check the compensation method oftime fluctuations by comparing resonant peak amplitudes between the Xe cell and the referentialmetal foil In the test a cylindrical quartz cell of 5 cm long filled with a natural Xe gas of 3 atmpressure a silver (Ag) foil of 10 microm thickness mounted on a goniometer and a Li glass scintillatorof 1 mm thickness were used as the cell metal foil and neutron detector Fig 3 represents a timeof flight (TOF) spectrum of neutrons transmitting through the unpolarized Xe cell It suggeststhat the Xe cell and Ag foil are suitable thickness because the both resonant peaks at 96 eV of129Xe and 52 eV of 109Ag could be distinguished with enough peak amplitudes In Fig 2 aneffective thickness lAg of the Ag foil depends on a inclination angle θ of the foil relative to theneutron beam direction and changes by rotating the goniometer We attempted to demonstratea sensitivity of our system by detecting a slight change of the ratio ∆R(θ) = 1minus rres(θ)rres(0

)as a function of θ where rres(θ) represents the amplitude ratio between the 96 eV resonantpeak of 129Xe and the 52 eV resonant peak of 109Ag In the beam test during a few hours∆R(30) = 0060 plusmn 0014 and ∆R(20) = 0013 plusmn 0011 have been obtained This preliminaryresult suggests that the sensitivity corresponding to ∆RXe = 1 minus RXe in Eq (3) reaches tosim 10minus2 in statistical errors

Figure 4 Typical NMR amplitudes (A) VXe of 129Xe and (B) VHe of 3He observed at νres =50 kHz

For monitoring the polarization of the cell during beam experiments an AFP-NMR system

5th European Conference on Neutron Scattering IOP PublishingJournal of Physics Conference Series 340 (2012) 012037 doi1010881742-65963401012037

5

has been developed [26 27] It can work inside of the Al oven in our SEOP system and detectNMR signals both of 3He and 129Xe at a same resonant frequency νres For demonstrating anability of our NMR system the measurement of PHe of a polarized 3He filter with cold neutronshas been carried out with observing NMR signal amplitudes VHe of 3He periodically Accordingto Eq (3) PHe was determined from the ratio RHe between neutron transmissions with the 3Hefilter polarized and unpolarized In the test a cylindrical glass cell of 5 cm long containing in a3He gas of 32 atm was used as the 3He filter Fig 4 represents the typical NMR amplitudes VXe

of 129Xe and VHe of 3He observed at νres =50 kHz Fig 5 represents time evolution process ofPHe deduced from RHe and VHe from a start time (t = 0) of the optical pumping By fitting theobserved values with Eq (4) macrPHe = 026 plusmn 002 was obtained from Fig 5 (A) It correspondsto VHe asymp 183 mV deduced from Fig 5 (B) While γminus1

gr = 954 plusmn 019 hours was also obtained

as a growth time of Fig 5 (B) It was consistent with the γminus1gr of Fig 5 (A) in statistical errors

We guess that the observed PHe might be small due to the lack of adjustment of the laser lighttransform optics because PHe ge 06 is obtained by using our SEOP system usually By usingthe correlation between PHe and VHe obtained from this test the polarization PXe of the Xecell can be deduced from the NMR amplitude VXe Actually we could obtain about 001 as PXe

corresponding to the amplitude VXe in Fig 4 (A)

Figure 5 Time evolutions of (A) PHe deduced from RHe and (B) VHe of NMR as a function of time tfrom start time (t = 0) of the optical pumping

5 Summary

We mentioned interest in the measurement of the s middot I term as a function of En for verificationof the NOPT and reported the experimental plan and feasibility tests for detecting the neutronpolarizing ability at the 96 eV resonant peak of 129Xe Although the statistical accuracy of∆RXe is dominated by the counting capability of our system at the present it will be achievedto sim 10minus3 by improving the detector and data acquisition system For obtaining the practicallXe and PXe we will attempt to optimize conditions of the SEOP system and prepare a Xe cellfilled with an enriched 129Xe gas of a low pressure in order to avoid a decrement of PXe withincreasing a Xe pressure For the study on the s middot I term in detail however the measurementsof AI and ωI with polarized neutron beams are indispensable Actually by using Pn = 05polarized neutron beams AI asymp 0038 is expected with a natural Xe cell of PXe = 02 and 15atmmiddotcm thickness though ∆RXe asymp 0003 is estimated with the same cell For realizing thesemeasurements developments of a polarized proton filter and a high pressure 3He filter will bedesirable as neutron spin filters at the MLF in J-PARC [28]

5th European Conference on Neutron Scattering IOP PublishingJournal of Physics Conference Series 340 (2012) 012037 doi1010881742-65963401012037

6

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the staffs of the MLF at J-PARC for their useful help and suggestions Thisresearch has been partly supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (No22604005) andthe Quantum Beam Fundamental Development Program MEXT

References

[1] B Larson et al Phys Rev A 44 (1991) 3108[2] A Yoshimi et al Phys Lett A 304 (2002) 13[3] IC Ruset et al Phys Rev Lett 96 (2006) 053002[4] AD Buckingham Chem Phys Lett 371 (2003) 517[5] VR Skoy J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol 110 (2005) 471[6] L Stodolsky Phys Lett B 172 (1986) 5[7] PK Kabir et al Phys Rev D 25 (1982) 25[8] R Balzer et al Phys Rev C 30 (1984) 1409[9] Y Masuda et al Nucl Phys A 478 (1988) 737

[10] VW Yuan et al Phys Rev A 44 (1991) 2178[11] HM Shimizu et al Nucl Phys A 552 (1993) 293[12] OP Sushkov et al JETP Lett A 32 (1980) 352[13] T Haseyama et al Phys Lett B 5341-4 (2002) 39[14] EA Kolomensky et al Phys Lett B 107 ( 1981) 272[15] B Heckel et al Phys Rev C 29 (1984) 2389[16] L Stodolsky Nucl Phys B 197 (1982) 213[17] VE Bunakov et al Phys Lett B 429 (1998) 7[18] VP Gudkov Physics Repors 212 No2 (1992) 77[19] L Koester et al Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 49 (1991) 65[20] ML Chadwick et al Nuclear Data Sheets 107 (2006) 2931 lthttpt2lanlgovdataneutron7htmlgt[21] K Oikawa et al Nuclear Instr and methods A 589 (2008) 310[22] H Kira et al Physica B 406 (2011) 2433[23] T Oku et al ldquoDevelopments of In-Situ SEOP Polarized 3He Neutron Spin Filter at J-PARCrdquo in these

proceedings[24] H Sato et al Nuclear Instr and methods A 402 (1998) 241[25] X Zeng et al Phys Lett A 96 (1983) 191[26] T Ino et al rdquoA compact SEOP 3He neutron spin filter with AFP NMRrdquo in these proceedings[27] T Ino et al Physica B 404 (2009) 2667[28] K Sakai et al Nuclear Instr and methods A 402 (1998) 244

5th European Conference on Neutron Scattering IOP PublishingJournal of Physics Conference Series 340 (2012) 012037 doi1010881742-65963401012037

7

Figure 3 Time of flight (TOF) spectrum of neutrons transmitting through unpolarized Xe cell

4 Feasibility test for measuring neutron polarizing ability of 129XeAccording to the apparatus in Fig 2 we have attempted to check the compensation method oftime fluctuations by comparing resonant peak amplitudes between the Xe cell and the referentialmetal foil In the test a cylindrical quartz cell of 5 cm long filled with a natural Xe gas of 3 atmpressure a silver (Ag) foil of 10 microm thickness mounted on a goniometer and a Li glass scintillatorof 1 mm thickness were used as the cell metal foil and neutron detector Fig 3 represents a timeof flight (TOF) spectrum of neutrons transmitting through the unpolarized Xe cell It suggeststhat the Xe cell and Ag foil are suitable thickness because the both resonant peaks at 96 eV of129Xe and 52 eV of 109Ag could be distinguished with enough peak amplitudes In Fig 2 aneffective thickness lAg of the Ag foil depends on a inclination angle θ of the foil relative to theneutron beam direction and changes by rotating the goniometer We attempted to demonstratea sensitivity of our system by detecting a slight change of the ratio ∆R(θ) = 1minus rres(θ)rres(0

)as a function of θ where rres(θ) represents the amplitude ratio between the 96 eV resonantpeak of 129Xe and the 52 eV resonant peak of 109Ag In the beam test during a few hours∆R(30) = 0060 plusmn 0014 and ∆R(20) = 0013 plusmn 0011 have been obtained This preliminaryresult suggests that the sensitivity corresponding to ∆RXe = 1 minus RXe in Eq (3) reaches tosim 10minus2 in statistical errors

Figure 4 Typical NMR amplitudes (A) VXe of 129Xe and (B) VHe of 3He observed at νres =50 kHz

For monitoring the polarization of the cell during beam experiments an AFP-NMR system

5th European Conference on Neutron Scattering IOP PublishingJournal of Physics Conference Series 340 (2012) 012037 doi1010881742-65963401012037

5

has been developed [26 27] It can work inside of the Al oven in our SEOP system and detectNMR signals both of 3He and 129Xe at a same resonant frequency νres For demonstrating anability of our NMR system the measurement of PHe of a polarized 3He filter with cold neutronshas been carried out with observing NMR signal amplitudes VHe of 3He periodically Accordingto Eq (3) PHe was determined from the ratio RHe between neutron transmissions with the 3Hefilter polarized and unpolarized In the test a cylindrical glass cell of 5 cm long containing in a3He gas of 32 atm was used as the 3He filter Fig 4 represents the typical NMR amplitudes VXe

of 129Xe and VHe of 3He observed at νres =50 kHz Fig 5 represents time evolution process ofPHe deduced from RHe and VHe from a start time (t = 0) of the optical pumping By fitting theobserved values with Eq (4) macrPHe = 026 plusmn 002 was obtained from Fig 5 (A) It correspondsto VHe asymp 183 mV deduced from Fig 5 (B) While γminus1

gr = 954 plusmn 019 hours was also obtained

as a growth time of Fig 5 (B) It was consistent with the γminus1gr of Fig 5 (A) in statistical errors

We guess that the observed PHe might be small due to the lack of adjustment of the laser lighttransform optics because PHe ge 06 is obtained by using our SEOP system usually By usingthe correlation between PHe and VHe obtained from this test the polarization PXe of the Xecell can be deduced from the NMR amplitude VXe Actually we could obtain about 001 as PXe

corresponding to the amplitude VXe in Fig 4 (A)

Figure 5 Time evolutions of (A) PHe deduced from RHe and (B) VHe of NMR as a function of time tfrom start time (t = 0) of the optical pumping

5 Summary

We mentioned interest in the measurement of the s middot I term as a function of En for verificationof the NOPT and reported the experimental plan and feasibility tests for detecting the neutronpolarizing ability at the 96 eV resonant peak of 129Xe Although the statistical accuracy of∆RXe is dominated by the counting capability of our system at the present it will be achievedto sim 10minus3 by improving the detector and data acquisition system For obtaining the practicallXe and PXe we will attempt to optimize conditions of the SEOP system and prepare a Xe cellfilled with an enriched 129Xe gas of a low pressure in order to avoid a decrement of PXe withincreasing a Xe pressure For the study on the s middot I term in detail however the measurementsof AI and ωI with polarized neutron beams are indispensable Actually by using Pn = 05polarized neutron beams AI asymp 0038 is expected with a natural Xe cell of PXe = 02 and 15atmmiddotcm thickness though ∆RXe asymp 0003 is estimated with the same cell For realizing thesemeasurements developments of a polarized proton filter and a high pressure 3He filter will bedesirable as neutron spin filters at the MLF in J-PARC [28]

5th European Conference on Neutron Scattering IOP PublishingJournal of Physics Conference Series 340 (2012) 012037 doi1010881742-65963401012037

6

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the staffs of the MLF at J-PARC for their useful help and suggestions Thisresearch has been partly supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (No22604005) andthe Quantum Beam Fundamental Development Program MEXT

References

[1] B Larson et al Phys Rev A 44 (1991) 3108[2] A Yoshimi et al Phys Lett A 304 (2002) 13[3] IC Ruset et al Phys Rev Lett 96 (2006) 053002[4] AD Buckingham Chem Phys Lett 371 (2003) 517[5] VR Skoy J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol 110 (2005) 471[6] L Stodolsky Phys Lett B 172 (1986) 5[7] PK Kabir et al Phys Rev D 25 (1982) 25[8] R Balzer et al Phys Rev C 30 (1984) 1409[9] Y Masuda et al Nucl Phys A 478 (1988) 737

[10] VW Yuan et al Phys Rev A 44 (1991) 2178[11] HM Shimizu et al Nucl Phys A 552 (1993) 293[12] OP Sushkov et al JETP Lett A 32 (1980) 352[13] T Haseyama et al Phys Lett B 5341-4 (2002) 39[14] EA Kolomensky et al Phys Lett B 107 ( 1981) 272[15] B Heckel et al Phys Rev C 29 (1984) 2389[16] L Stodolsky Nucl Phys B 197 (1982) 213[17] VE Bunakov et al Phys Lett B 429 (1998) 7[18] VP Gudkov Physics Repors 212 No2 (1992) 77[19] L Koester et al Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 49 (1991) 65[20] ML Chadwick et al Nuclear Data Sheets 107 (2006) 2931 lthttpt2lanlgovdataneutron7htmlgt[21] K Oikawa et al Nuclear Instr and methods A 589 (2008) 310[22] H Kira et al Physica B 406 (2011) 2433[23] T Oku et al ldquoDevelopments of In-Situ SEOP Polarized 3He Neutron Spin Filter at J-PARCrdquo in these

proceedings[24] H Sato et al Nuclear Instr and methods A 402 (1998) 241[25] X Zeng et al Phys Lett A 96 (1983) 191[26] T Ino et al rdquoA compact SEOP 3He neutron spin filter with AFP NMRrdquo in these proceedings[27] T Ino et al Physica B 404 (2009) 2667[28] K Sakai et al Nuclear Instr and methods A 402 (1998) 244

5th European Conference on Neutron Scattering IOP PublishingJournal of Physics Conference Series 340 (2012) 012037 doi1010881742-65963401012037

7

has been developed [26 27] It can work inside of the Al oven in our SEOP system and detectNMR signals both of 3He and 129Xe at a same resonant frequency νres For demonstrating anability of our NMR system the measurement of PHe of a polarized 3He filter with cold neutronshas been carried out with observing NMR signal amplitudes VHe of 3He periodically Accordingto Eq (3) PHe was determined from the ratio RHe between neutron transmissions with the 3Hefilter polarized and unpolarized In the test a cylindrical glass cell of 5 cm long containing in a3He gas of 32 atm was used as the 3He filter Fig 4 represents the typical NMR amplitudes VXe

of 129Xe and VHe of 3He observed at νres =50 kHz Fig 5 represents time evolution process ofPHe deduced from RHe and VHe from a start time (t = 0) of the optical pumping By fitting theobserved values with Eq (4) macrPHe = 026 plusmn 002 was obtained from Fig 5 (A) It correspondsto VHe asymp 183 mV deduced from Fig 5 (B) While γminus1

gr = 954 plusmn 019 hours was also obtained

as a growth time of Fig 5 (B) It was consistent with the γminus1gr of Fig 5 (A) in statistical errors

We guess that the observed PHe might be small due to the lack of adjustment of the laser lighttransform optics because PHe ge 06 is obtained by using our SEOP system usually By usingthe correlation between PHe and VHe obtained from this test the polarization PXe of the Xecell can be deduced from the NMR amplitude VXe Actually we could obtain about 001 as PXe

corresponding to the amplitude VXe in Fig 4 (A)

Figure 5 Time evolutions of (A) PHe deduced from RHe and (B) VHe of NMR as a function of time tfrom start time (t = 0) of the optical pumping

5 Summary

We mentioned interest in the measurement of the s middot I term as a function of En for verificationof the NOPT and reported the experimental plan and feasibility tests for detecting the neutronpolarizing ability at the 96 eV resonant peak of 129Xe Although the statistical accuracy of∆RXe is dominated by the counting capability of our system at the present it will be achievedto sim 10minus3 by improving the detector and data acquisition system For obtaining the practicallXe and PXe we will attempt to optimize conditions of the SEOP system and prepare a Xe cellfilled with an enriched 129Xe gas of a low pressure in order to avoid a decrement of PXe withincreasing a Xe pressure For the study on the s middot I term in detail however the measurementsof AI and ωI with polarized neutron beams are indispensable Actually by using Pn = 05polarized neutron beams AI asymp 0038 is expected with a natural Xe cell of PXe = 02 and 15atmmiddotcm thickness though ∆RXe asymp 0003 is estimated with the same cell For realizing thesemeasurements developments of a polarized proton filter and a high pressure 3He filter will bedesirable as neutron spin filters at the MLF in J-PARC [28]

5th European Conference on Neutron Scattering IOP PublishingJournal of Physics Conference Series 340 (2012) 012037 doi1010881742-65963401012037

6

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the staffs of the MLF at J-PARC for their useful help and suggestions Thisresearch has been partly supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (No22604005) andthe Quantum Beam Fundamental Development Program MEXT

References

[1] B Larson et al Phys Rev A 44 (1991) 3108[2] A Yoshimi et al Phys Lett A 304 (2002) 13[3] IC Ruset et al Phys Rev Lett 96 (2006) 053002[4] AD Buckingham Chem Phys Lett 371 (2003) 517[5] VR Skoy J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol 110 (2005) 471[6] L Stodolsky Phys Lett B 172 (1986) 5[7] PK Kabir et al Phys Rev D 25 (1982) 25[8] R Balzer et al Phys Rev C 30 (1984) 1409[9] Y Masuda et al Nucl Phys A 478 (1988) 737

[10] VW Yuan et al Phys Rev A 44 (1991) 2178[11] HM Shimizu et al Nucl Phys A 552 (1993) 293[12] OP Sushkov et al JETP Lett A 32 (1980) 352[13] T Haseyama et al Phys Lett B 5341-4 (2002) 39[14] EA Kolomensky et al Phys Lett B 107 ( 1981) 272[15] B Heckel et al Phys Rev C 29 (1984) 2389[16] L Stodolsky Nucl Phys B 197 (1982) 213[17] VE Bunakov et al Phys Lett B 429 (1998) 7[18] VP Gudkov Physics Repors 212 No2 (1992) 77[19] L Koester et al Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 49 (1991) 65[20] ML Chadwick et al Nuclear Data Sheets 107 (2006) 2931 lthttpt2lanlgovdataneutron7htmlgt[21] K Oikawa et al Nuclear Instr and methods A 589 (2008) 310[22] H Kira et al Physica B 406 (2011) 2433[23] T Oku et al ldquoDevelopments of In-Situ SEOP Polarized 3He Neutron Spin Filter at J-PARCrdquo in these

proceedings[24] H Sato et al Nuclear Instr and methods A 402 (1998) 241[25] X Zeng et al Phys Lett A 96 (1983) 191[26] T Ino et al rdquoA compact SEOP 3He neutron spin filter with AFP NMRrdquo in these proceedings[27] T Ino et al Physica B 404 (2009) 2667[28] K Sakai et al Nuclear Instr and methods A 402 (1998) 244

5th European Conference on Neutron Scattering IOP PublishingJournal of Physics Conference Series 340 (2012) 012037 doi1010881742-65963401012037

7

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the staffs of the MLF at J-PARC for their useful help and suggestions Thisresearch has been partly supported by Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (No22604005) andthe Quantum Beam Fundamental Development Program MEXT

References

[1] B Larson et al Phys Rev A 44 (1991) 3108[2] A Yoshimi et al Phys Lett A 304 (2002) 13[3] IC Ruset et al Phys Rev Lett 96 (2006) 053002[4] AD Buckingham Chem Phys Lett 371 (2003) 517[5] VR Skoy J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol 110 (2005) 471[6] L Stodolsky Phys Lett B 172 (1986) 5[7] PK Kabir et al Phys Rev D 25 (1982) 25[8] R Balzer et al Phys Rev C 30 (1984) 1409[9] Y Masuda et al Nucl Phys A 478 (1988) 737

[10] VW Yuan et al Phys Rev A 44 (1991) 2178[11] HM Shimizu et al Nucl Phys A 552 (1993) 293[12] OP Sushkov et al JETP Lett A 32 (1980) 352[13] T Haseyama et al Phys Lett B 5341-4 (2002) 39[14] EA Kolomensky et al Phys Lett B 107 ( 1981) 272[15] B Heckel et al Phys Rev C 29 (1984) 2389[16] L Stodolsky Nucl Phys B 197 (1982) 213[17] VE Bunakov et al Phys Lett B 429 (1998) 7[18] VP Gudkov Physics Repors 212 No2 (1992) 77[19] L Koester et al Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 49 (1991) 65[20] ML Chadwick et al Nuclear Data Sheets 107 (2006) 2931 lthttpt2lanlgovdataneutron7htmlgt[21] K Oikawa et al Nuclear Instr and methods A 589 (2008) 310[22] H Kira et al Physica B 406 (2011) 2433[23] T Oku et al ldquoDevelopments of In-Situ SEOP Polarized 3He Neutron Spin Filter at J-PARCrdquo in these

proceedings[24] H Sato et al Nuclear Instr and methods A 402 (1998) 241[25] X Zeng et al Phys Lett A 96 (1983) 191[26] T Ino et al rdquoA compact SEOP 3He neutron spin filter with AFP NMRrdquo in these proceedings[27] T Ino et al Physica B 404 (2009) 2667[28] K Sakai et al Nuclear Instr and methods A 402 (1998) 244

5th European Conference on Neutron Scattering IOP PublishingJournal of Physics Conference Series 340 (2012) 012037 doi1010881742-65963401012037

7