development of nodular regenerative hyperplasia (nrh) with
TRANSCRIPT
383
□ CASE REPORT □
Development of Nodular Regenerative Hyperplasia (NRH)with Portal Hypertension Following the Administration
of Oxaliplatin for the Recurrence of Colon Cancer
Hiroaki Takaya, Hideto Kawaratani, Keisuke Nakanishi, Shinya Takeyama, Chie Morioka,
Masayoshi Sawai, Masahisa Toyohara, Masao Fujimoto, Hitoshi Yoshiji,
Junichi Yamao and Hiroshi Fukui
Abstract
Nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH) is associated with autoimmune and hematologic diseases and may
lead to portal hypertension. We herein report a case of NRH diagnosed based on a liver biopsy. A 63-year-
old woman developed esophageal varices and splenomegaly. She had undergone surgery for transverse colon
cancer 24 years earlier and received systemic chemotherapy (FOLFOX4 including oxaliplatin) to treat lymph
node metastasis 21 years after the operation. The present liver biopsy confirmed NRH, and, after two years,
she received endoscopic injection sclerotherapy. Oxaliplatin was suspected to be the causative agent of NRH
in this case. Therefore, physicians must consider the possibility of NRH in patients who receive chemother-
apy.
Key words: nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH), esophageal varices, oxaliplatin, colon cancer
(Intern Med 54: 383-387, 2015)(DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.54.2461)
Introduction
Nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH) was first de-
scribed by Steiner in 1959 (1). NRH of the liver is charac-
terized by innumerable small areas of focal regeneration
more or less distinctively demarcated by adjacent compres-
sive, atrophic or other degenerative and circulatory effects.
Lacking a true increase in fibrotic tissue, the lesion does not
conform to the definition of cirrhosis, which it sometimes
resembles. NRH is associated with rheumatic and hemato-
logical diseases, leading to the development of portal hyper-
tension in 4.6% of patients (2). We herein report a rare case
of NRH diagnosed based on a liver biopsy after systemic
chemotherapy for colon cancer. The patient subsequently un-
derwent endoscopic injection sclerotherapy for esophageal
varices.
Case Report
A 63-year-old woman was referred to our hospital due to
worsening of esophageal varices and enlargement of the
spleen. She had a maternal family history of diabetes melli-
tus (DM) and had smoked 20 cigarettes per day, although
she did not drink alcohol. She had undergone surgery for
transverse colon cancer approximately 24 years previously
and had been treated for DM and rheumatoid arthritis (RA)
for approximately 15 years. She received insulin, voglibose,
bucillamine and methotrexate. As she was found to have in-
guinal lymph node metastasis of colon cancer three years
earlier, she had a history of treatment with FOLFOX4 (con-
taining 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and leucovorin), having re-
ceived 37 courses of FOLFOX4 for approximately two
years. After the treatment, the inguinal lymph node metasta-
sis had healed, and she stopped the medications. Thereafter,
she experienced no recurrence of transverse colon cancer or
Third Department of Internal Medicine, Nara Medical University, Japan
Received for publication January 14, 2014; Accepted for publication June 23, 2014
Correspondence to Dr. Hideto Kawaratani, [email protected]
Intern Med 54: 383-387, 2015 DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.54.2461
384
Table. Laboratory Data on Admission
Peripheral Blood Blood urea nitrogen 13 mg/dLWhite blood cell 3,600 / L Serum creatinine 0.7 mg/dLRed blood cell 471× 104/ L Serum sodium concentration 141 mEq/LHemoglobin 12.2 g/dL Serum potassium concentration 4.2 mEq/LHematocrit 32.80% Serum calcium concentration 7.4 mg/dLPlatelet 12.7 x104/ L Fasting blood glucose 83 mg/dL
Hemoglobin A1c 4.8%Blood Coagulation Immunoreactive insulin 126 U/mLProthrombin time 12.6 secActivated partial thromboplastin time 33.7 sec Hepatitis Virus
HBs antigen negativeBlood Chemistry HBc antigen negativeC-reactive protein 1.5 mg/dL HBs antibody negativeTotal protein 6.8 g/dL HCV antibody negativeSerum albumin 4.5 g/dLAspartate aminotransferase 18 IU/L Immunological InvestigationAlanine aminotransferase 14 IU/L Anti-nuclear antibody 4 foldAlkaline phosphatase 471 IU/L Anti-liver/kidney microsome type 1 37.3 INDEX-glutamyl transpeptidase 24 IU/L Immunoglobulin A 273 mg/dL
Lactate dehydrogenase 228 IU/L Immunoglobulin M 220 mg/dLSerum total bilirubin 0.7 mg/dL Immunoglobulin G 1,118 mg/dL
Figure 1. Abdominal CT imaging of the liver performed on admission revealed a rough inner structure, central swelling and peripheral atrophy resembling liver cirrhosis.
inguinal lymph node metastasis for one year. At that time,
she had no symptoms, and her Eastern Cooperative Oncol-
ogy Group (EGOG) performance status was 0. However, the
platelet level had declined from 35.5×104/μL to 12.7×104/μL
within three years. Meanwhile, the hepatic and biliary enzy-
matic activities were almost normal [aspartate aminotrans-
ferase (AST): 18 IU/L, alanine aminotransferase (ALT): 14
IU/L, alkaline phosphatase (ALP): 471 IU/L, lactate dehy-
drogenase (LDH): 228 IU/L and γ-GTP: 24 IU/L], and HBs
antigens and HCV antibodies were negative. The titer of
anti-nuclear antibodies (ANA) was increased 4-fold, and
anti-liver/kidney microsome type 1 (LKM-1) antibodies
were positive (37.3 INDEX). In contrast, the immunoglobu-
lin levels were normal (IgA: 273 mg/dL, IgG: 1,118 mg/dL
and IgM: 220 mg/dL), and the DM and RA were well con-
trolled. The glucose level was 83 mg/dL, the HbA1c level
was 4.8% and the C-reactive protein (CRP) level was 1.5
mg/dL (Table).
Computed tomography (CT) of the liver revealed a rough
inner structure, central swelling and peripheral atrophy
(Fig. 1). The spleen had also become enlarged within two
years (Fig. 2), although the portal vein exhibited no throm-
bosis or stenosis. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD)
showed grade 2 esophageal varices (3). Since the patient
had no history of viral hepatitis, and anti-LKM-1 antibodies
were positive, a diagnosis of type 2 autoimmune hepatitis
(AIH) with liver cirrhosis was initially suspected. However,
a liver biopsy specimen demonstrated a disturbed architec-
ture with a nodular appearance in the liver parenchyma in
addition to areas of sinusoidal congestion. A regenerative
nodule was bordered by irregular small-sized hepatic trabe-
culae, with hardly any fibrous septa (Fig. 3). We therefore
diagnosed the patient as NRH with portal hypertension of
the liver. Two years after the liver biopsy, the esophageal
varices worsened (Fig. 4A, B), and the patient underwent
endoscopic injection sclerotherapy. Since then, she has expe-
rienced no further recurrence of esophageal varices
(Fig. 4C).
Discussion
It is widely known that chemotherapy-induced hepatic
toxicity (CIHT) is subclassified into non-alcoholic fatty liver
disease (NAFLD) and sinusoidal obstruction syndrome
(SOS) (4, 5). Sometimes NRH is classified as a severe form
of SOS. NRH is a rare liver disease with an etiology that is
not well understood. The pathogenesis of NRH is thought to
involve endothelial damage, which subsequently induces the
widespread obliteration of small portal veins throughout the
liver parenchyma. Initially, the present patient was suspected
of having type 2 AIH because anti-LKM-1 antibody was
positive. However, the liver biopsy specimen exhibited no
Intern Med 54: 383-387, 2015 DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.54.2461
385
Figure 2. Comparison of abdominal CT imaging findings. The size of the spleen increased over two years. (A) Two years earlier. (B) On admission.
(A) (B)
Figure 3. Histology of the liver biopsy specimen. The liver had a disturbed architecture with a nodular appearance in the liver parenchyma (arrow), characteristic of nodular regenerative hyper-plasia. Areas with sinusoidal congestion were also present. A regenerative nodule was bordered by irregular small-sized hepatic trabeculae (arrowhead). However, the liver specimen showed hardly any areas of fibrous. (A) Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) staining, ×40. (B) H&E staining, ×100. (C) Azan staining, ×40.
(A) (B)
(C)
piecemeal necrosis, plasma cell infiltration or rosette forma-
tion. Therefore, the possibility of AIH was excluded. Anti-
LKM-1 antibody is associated with thyroid disease, polyar-
thritis, collagen disease, colon cancer, vitiligo, insulin-
dependent DM, pernicious anemia and autoimmune hemo-
lytic anemia (6, 7). Some patients do not display evidence
of liver disease, although they are positive for anti-LKM-1
antibody (8). NRH is associated with autoimmune and he-
matologic diseases. For example, Wanless reported finding a
spectrum of NRH disorders among 64 cases at 2,500 autop-
sies, with an increased frequency of NRH in patients with
systemic arteritis, polymyalgia rheumatica, massive tumor
infiltration and mineral oil deposition (2). On the other
hand, Thung et al. reported a case of NRH associated with
maturity-onset DM accompanied by an elevated serum insu-
lin level and proposed that hepatotrophic hormones, such as
Intern Med 54: 383-387, 2015 DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.54.2461
386
Figure 4. Images of esophagogastroduodenoscopy. (A) EGD showed grade 2 (moderate-sized clubbed varices) esophageal varices with (B) the red color sign. (C) The varices were completely eradicated 14 months after endoscopic injection sclerotherapy.
(A) (B)
(C)
insulin and glucagon may play a role in the development of
NRH (9). Moreover, a case of NRH that developed after the
administration of neoadjuvant oxaliplatin-containing chemo-
therapy for colon cancer was reported in 2006 (10). Re-
cently, the incidence of NRH following treatment with
oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy has increased (11). Among
the administered drugs during FOLFOX4 treatment, leuco-
vorin and 5-fluorouracil are sometimes associated with the
onset of fatty liver. Furthermore, Ortiz Morales reported a
case of colon cancer in a patient who received oxaliplatin-
based systemic chemotherapy and developed bleeding
varices (12). In the present case, the patient had used oral
hypoglycemic and anti-rheumatic agents over a period of 15
years, although no changes in the liver function or spleen
size were detected. Since the spleen only became enlarged
after FOLFOX4 treatment, we suspected that the administra-
tion of oxaliplatin may induce the development of NRH.
Wanless reported that NRH includes both arterial and ar-
teriolar sclerosis and is characterized by nonspecific tissue
adaptations to a heterogeneous distribution of the blood
flow (2). In addition, a change in the sinusoid in patients
with microvascular injuries is a primary event that may re-
sult in the onset of hepatocyte hypoxia with liver dysfunc-
tion and disruption of the portal circulation (13). Oxaliplatin
potentially causes injury to endothelial cells as it stimulates
the overproduction of reactive oxygen species and depletion
of glutathione in endothelial cells followed by the unregu-
lated expression of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 and
MMP-9 (14) and the rupture of the sinusoidal barrier, with
the possible extravasation of erythrocytes in the space of
Disse and formation of perisinusoidal fibrosis. Moreover,
NRH is attributed to the development of chronic ischemia in
centrilobular zones (10); this process is thought to be due to
the effects of ischemic atrophy associated with secondary
nodular hyperplasia in regions with a favorable blood flow.
In the present case, treatment with oxaliplatin may have in-
duced a circulatory disturbance, thus leading to the develop-
ment of NRH.
It is often difficult to distinguish NRH from focal nodular
hyperplasia (FNH), alcoholic regenerative nodules and idi-
opathic portal hypertension (IPH). FNH lesions display cen-
tral scarring and thick vessels. Alcoholic regenerative nod-
ules exhibit similar characteristics, but without central scar-
ring, while IPH involves peripheral portal vein stenosis and
aberrant vessels. Meanwhile, NRH includes many regenera-
tive nodules, with areas of sinusoidal enlargement, but no fi-
brotic lesions (15). Recently, the concept of SOS was pro-
posed. SOS lesions are characterized by hepatic sinusoidal
dilatation, hepatocyte atrophy, perisinusoidal fibrosis and
nodular regenerative hyperplasia (4); NRH is part of the
SOS spectrum. In the current case, the liver histology re-
vealed many regenerative nodules with sinusoidal enlarge-
ment, although no fibrotic lesions, central scarring, periph-
eral portal vein stenosis or aberrant vessels were detected,
supporting the diagnosis of NRH. Treatment for NRH pri-
marily involves eliminating the underlying causative factors;
no other standard therapies have been established. The prog-
nosis of NRH is influenced by the development of portal
hypertension and its complications (16). Therefore, control-
ling portal hypertension provides the basis for delivering
therapeutic treatment for NRH and improving the prognosis.
However, once esophageal varices develop, they should be
treated.
The present report describes a rare case of NRH with por-
Intern Med 54: 383-387, 2015 DOI: 10.2169/internalmedicine.54.2461
387
tal hypertension that developed after oxaliplatin administra-
tion in which the patient was later treated for esophageal
varices. When portal hypertension, such as that due to
splenomegaly or the formation of esophageal varices, with-
out liver dysfunction is noted after systemic chemotherapy
with oxaliplatin, physicians should consider the possibility
of NRH with portal hypertension. Because the standard
treatment for NRH has not yet been established, new thera-
peutic strategies must be developed in the near future.
The authors state that they have no Conflict of Interest (COI).
References
1. Steiner PE. Nodular regenerative hyperplasia of the liver. Am J
Pathol 35: 943-953, 1959.
2. Wanless IR. Micronodular transformation (nodular regenerative
hyperplasia) of the liver: a report of 64 cases among 2,500 autop-
sies and a new classification of benign hepatocellular nodules. He-
patology 11: 787-797, 1990.
3. Thakeb F, Zakaria MS, Hunter M, et al. A study of the oesopha-
gus by endoscopy and radiology after sclerotherapy. In: Gastroin-
testinal Endoscopy: An Egyptian view. El-Sona El-Mohamadia,
Egypt, 1988: 51.
4. Rubbia-Brandt L, Audard V, Sartoretti P, et al. Severe hepatic si-
nusoidal obstruction associated with oxaliplatin-based chemother-
apy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 15:
460-466, 2004.
5. Fernandez FG, Ritter J, Goodwin JW, et al. Effect of steatohepati-
tis associated with irinotecan or oxaliplatin pretreatment on resec-
tability of hepatic colorectal metastases. J Am Coll Surg 200: 845-
853, 2005.
6. Smith MG, Williams R, Walker G, et al. Hepatic disorders associ-
ated with liver-kidney microsomal antibodies. Br Med J 2: 80-84,
1974.
7. Hornberg JC, Abuaf N, Bernard O, et al. Chronic active hepatitis
associated with antiliver/kidney microsome antibody type 1: a sec-
ond type of “autoimmune” hepatitis. Hepatology 7: 1333-1339,
1987.
8. Manns MP, Johnson EF, Griffin KJ, et al. Major antigen of liver
kidney microsomal autoantibodies in idiopathic autoimmune hepa-
titis is cytochrome P450db1. J Clin Invest 83: 1066-1072, 1989.
9. Thung SN, Gerber MA, Bodenheimer HC Jr. Nodular regenerative
hyperplasia of the liver in a patient with diabetes mellitus. Cancer
49: 543-546, 1982.
10. Arotçarena R, Cales V, Berthelemy P, et al. Severe sinusoidal le-
sions: a serious and overlooked complication of oxaliplatin-
containing chemotherapy? Gastroenterol Clin Biol 30: 1313-1316,
2006.
11. Wicherts DA, de Haas RJ, Sebagh M, et al. Regenerative nodular
hyperplasia of the liver related to chemotherapy: impact on out-
come of liver surgery for colorectal metastases. Ann Surg Oncol
18: 659-669, 2011.
12. Ortiz Morales CM, Arraiza Sarasa M, BenitoB oillos A, et al. Di-
rect embolization of stomal varices in portal hypertension after the
treatment of liver metastases. Radiologia 52: 556-559, 2010.
13. DeLeve LD. Hepatic microvasculature in liver injury. Semin Liver
Dis 27: 390-400, 2007.
14. Ribero D, Wang H, Donadon M, et al. Bevacizumab improves pa-
thologic response and protects against hepatic injury in patients
treated with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for colorectal liver
metastases. Cancer 15: 2761-2767, 2007.
15. Kondo F, Nagao T, Sato T, et al. Etiological analysis of focal
nodular hyperplasia of the liver, with emphasis on similar abnor-
mal vasculatures to nodular regenerative hyperplasia and idi-
opathic portal hypertension. Pathol Res Pract 194: 487-495, 1998.
16. Hartleb M, Gutkowski K, Milkiewicz P. Nodular regenerative hy-
perplasia: evolving concepts on underdiagnosed cause of portal
hypertension. World J Gastroenterol 17: 1400-1409, 2011.
Ⓒ 2015 The Japanese Society of Internal Medicine
http://www.naika.or.jp/imonline/index.html