development of an ultra-low nox integrated system for ......

29
Development of an Ultra-Low NOx Integrated System for Pulverized Coal Fired Power Plants Galen H. Richards May 16, 2002 May 16, 2002

Upload: phamdieu

Post on 17-May-2018

223 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Development of an Ultra-Low NOx Integrated System for Pulverized Coal

Fired Power Plants

Galen H. Richards

May 16, 2002May 16, 2002

DOE NOX\Technical Papers\Clearwater_3-6-02

Authors

Galen H. Richards, John L. Marion, Charles Q. Maney,

Power Plant Laboratories

ALSTOM Power, Inc.

Robert Lewis and Doug Hart

Performance Projects Businesses

ALSTOM Power, Inc.

DOE NOX\Technical Papers\Clearwater_3-6-02

Project Participants

U.S. Department of EnergyNational Energy Technology LaboratoryPittsburgh, PA

Progress Materials, Inc.Tampa, FL

Kennecott Energy Co.Gillette, WY

U.S. Power Plant LaboratoriesALSTOM Power, Inc.Windsor, CT

Performance ProjectsUtility Boilers BUALSTOM Power, Inc.Windsor, CT

Environmental Systems Utility Boilers BUALSTOM Power, Inc.Knoxville, TN

DOE NOX\Technical Papers\Clearwater_3-6-02

Project Objectives

Develop low cost, retrofit NOx control technologies to address current and anticipated, near term emissions control legislation for existing coal fired utility boilers.

Specific goals include:

– Achieve < 0.15 lb/MMBtu NOx for Eastern bituminous coals (current <0.25 lb/MMBtu)

– Achieve < 0.10 lb/MMBtu NOx for Western sub-bituminous coals (current < 0.15 lb/MMBtu)

– Total cost at least 25% less than SCR-only technology

DOE NOX\Technical Papers\Clearwater_3-6-02

Project Strategy

Build upon commercially proven TFS 2000™ technology

Integrated systems solution to further reduce boiler emissions by:

– Enhancing current system components

– Optimizing fuel and air distributions

– Adding post combustion measures (as needed)

– Incorporating advanced sensor and control technology to assist in achieving and maintaining desired boiler performance

DOE NOX\Technical Papers\Clearwater_3-6-02

TFS 2000™ Firing System

• Features Include: - Flame Front Control Coal

Nozzle Tips- Concentric Firing System

(CFS™) Nozzles- Close-Coupled Overfire Air- Multi-level Separated

Overfire Air- Dynamic™ Classifiers

DOE NOX\Technical Papers\Clearwater_3-6-02

Enhancements Under Study

Optimized Transport Air to Fuel Ratio Coal & Air Flow BalancingLNCFSTM P2 Coal Nozzle TipsVariable Velocity Overfire Air Coal Fineness ImprovementAdvanced (Neural Net Based) Control SystemCarbon Burn Out™ Bubbling Bed Char Oxidizer

DOE NOX\Technical Papers\Clearwater_3-6-02

Project Tasks

Fuels CharacterizationCFD ModelingLarge Pilot-Scale Combustion TestingEngineering & Economic Analysis

DOE NOX\Technical Papers\Clearwater_3-6-02

Fuels CharacterizationFuels Characterization

ASTM ASTM

Drop Tube Furnace SystemDrop Tube Furnace System(DTFS)(DTFS)

DOE NOX\Technical Papers\Clearwater_3-6-02

Project Fuels Characterization

0

20

40

60

80

100

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0Stoichiometry

Car

bon

in F

ly A

sh, W

eigh

t %

subbithvbmvb

subbit hvb mvbProximate

After Pulverization

VM 35.6 37.7 22.5FC 39.6 51.4 63.1FC/VM 1.1 1.4 2.8

UltimateMoisture 18.9 4.3 0.9Hydrogen 3.7 4.9 4.0Carbon 56.4 71.6 74.7Sulfur 0.4 2.5 1.4Nitrogen 0.9 1.5 1.3Oxygen 13.8 7.9 4.2Ash 5.9 7.2 13.6Total 100.0 100.0 100.0

HHV, BTU/lb 9890 13088 13109

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

subbit hvb mvb

Vol

atile

Mat

ter,

% D

ry-A

sh-F

ree

ASTM DTFS-1

DTFS

DOE NOX\Technical Papers\Clearwater_3-6-02

DTFS - Nitrogen Evolution

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00Stoichiometry

Fuel

Nitr

ogen

Evo

lutio

n, W

eigh

t %

subbithvbmvb

Subbit. & hvb coals release nitrogen more readily than mvb coal

mvb coal retains larger fraction of nitrogen in the charChar nitrogen more likely to form NOx

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

50 60 70 80 90 100 110Carbon Conversion Efficiency, Weight %

Fuel

Nitr

ogen

Evo

lutio

n, W

eigh

t %

subbithvbmvb

DOE NOX\Technical Papers\Clearwater_3-6-02

Large PilotLarge Pilot--Scale Scale Combustion TestingCombustion Testing

DOE NOX\Technical Papers\Clearwater_3-6-02

Boiler Simulation Facility (BSF)

• Large-pilot scale, utility boiler design combustion test facility

• Models hopper through economizer region

• 60 MMBtu/hr firing rate

• Coal, oil, or natural gas capable

• Tangential or wall fired operating modes

• Used for the development of ALSTOM Power’s TFS 2000™ Firing System

DOE NOX\Technical Papers\Clearwater_3-6-02

BSF Test Results - NOx

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

subbit hvb mvb

NO

x [lb

/MM

Btu

]

Baseline TFS 2000 Ultra Low NOx System Microfine

0.15 lb/MMBtu

65% -200 mesh 85% -200 mesh 85% -200 mesh96% -325 mesh

DOE NOX\Technical Papers\Clearwater_3-6-02

BSF Test Results -Carbon in Fly Ash

0

2

4

6

8

10

subbit hvb mvb

% C

arbo

n in

Fly

Ash

Baseline TFS 2000 Ultra Low NOx System Microfine

65% -200 mesh 85% -200 mesh 85% -200 mesh96% -325 mesh

DOE NOX\Technical Papers\Clearwater_3-6-02

Engineering & Economic Engineering & Economic AnalysisAnalysis

DOE NOX\Technical Papers\Clearwater_3-6-02

Scope of Analysis

3 T-Fired Utility Boilers in U.S.– Unit A: 400 MW, East Coast, Eastern Bit. compliance coal– Unit B: 500 MW, Midwest U.S., Midwestern Bit. coal

– Unit C: 330 MW, Western U.S., PRB coal

NOx Reduction Options Evaluated– Buying NOx Credits– TFS 2000™ Firing System– Ultra Low NOx Firing System– SCR– Fuel Switching to PRB– Use of Carbon Burnout Device™ (bubbling bed)

DOE NOX\Technical Papers\Clearwater_3-6-02

Scope of Analysis (cont.)

Boiler performance modeling to determine:– Net plant heat rate– Net electric output– Scope of surface modifications required

Budgetary pricing of hardware modificationsALSTOM POWER economic model

DOE NOX\Technical Papers\Clearwater_3-6-02

Economic Model Assumptions

Parameter Value UnitsDepreciable Life 15 YearsEquity 50 %Interest Rate 9 %Capacity Factor 70 %Ash Disposal Cost 10 $/tonAsh Value 5 $/tonNOx Limit 0.15 lb/106 BtuSO2 Credits 150 $/tonNOx Credits 1500 $/tonSCR Efficiency 80 %SCR Installed Cost 100 $/kw

DOE NOX\Technical Papers\Clearwater_3-6-02

Delivered Fuel Costs

2001 plant fuel costsPRB fuel switch - coal supplier estimate

$/MMBtuUnit A East. Bit. 1.83 PRB 2.10Unit B Midwest. Bit. 0.88 PRB 1.10Unit A PRB 0.50

DOE NOX\Technical Papers\Clearwater_3-6-02

Predicted NOx Emissions for Economic Study

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

Baseline BuyCredits

TFS 2000 ULN ULN +CBO

TFS2000+ PRB

ULN +PRB

SCR TFS2000+ SCR

NO

x Em

issi

ons,

lb/M

MB

tu

Unit A - 400MW, East. Bit

Unit B - 500MW, Midwest. Bit

Unit C - 330MW, PRB**

* Post NSPS Units

0.15 lb/MMBtu

DOE NOX\Technical Papers\Clearwater_3-6-02

Project Capital Cost

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

BuyCredits

TFS2000

ULN ULN +CBO

TFS2000+ PRB

ULN +PRB

SCR TFS2000+ SCR

Cap

ital C

ost,

$MU

SD

Unit A - 400MW, East. Bit

Unit B - 500MW, Midwest. Bit

Unit C - 330MW, PRB

DOE NOX\Technical Papers\Clearwater_3-6-02

Impact on Cost of Electricity

-1.5

-0.5

0.5

1.5

2.5

3.5

4.5

BuyCredits

TFS 2000 ULN ULN +CBO

TFS2000+ PRB

ULN +PRB

SCR TFS2000+ SCR

Leve

lized

Incr

ease

in C

ost o

f Ele

ctric

ity, (

mill

s/kW

h)

-2

-1

1

2

3

4

5Unit A - 400MW, East. BitUnit B - 500MW, Midwest. BitUnit C - 330MW, PRB

Note: All cases meet NOx compliance by performance or purchased credits.

↑ ↑ ↑↑ ↑

↑ ↑ ↑↑ ↑ ↑

↑ = NOx compliant by performance.

DOE NOX\Technical Papers\Clearwater_3-6-02

Impact of PRB Fuel Cost - Unit A

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

Buy Credits TFS 2000 ULN TFS2000 +PRB

ULN + PRB SCR

Leve

lized

Incr

ease

in C

OE,

(mill

s/kW

h) PRB Cost = 2.1 $/MMBtu PRB Cost = 1.83 $/MMBtu

DOE NOX\Technical Papers\Clearwater_3-6-02

Impact of NOx Credit Price - Unit A

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

Buy Credits TFS 2000 ULN TFS2000 +PRB

ULN + PRB SCR

Leve

lized

Incr

ease

in C

ost o

f Ele

ctric

ity, (

mill

s/kW

h)

$1000/ton $1500/ton $3000/ton

DOE NOX\Technical Papers\Clearwater_3-6-02

Observations from Economic Analysis

“Best” NOx reduction strategy is unit specific.Unit A - Eastern U.S.– TFS 2000™(0.22 lb/MMBtu) best for hvb coal.– Economics are sensitive to PRB fuel and NOx credit price.

Unit B - Midwestern U.S.– Ultra low NOx system (0.18 lb/MMBtu NOx) best for hvb coal.– Best NOx solution - Comb. Mods with fuel switch to PRB coal.

Unit C - Western U.S.– Ultra low NOx system (0.13 lb/MMBtu NOx) best for PRB coal.

DOE NOX\Technical Papers\Clearwater_3-6-02

ALSTOM T-Fired Low NOx Experience

Rank Fuel TypeUnit Size

MWe Status

Low NOxSystemType

EPA 3rd Qtr2001 NOxLb/MMBtu

1 PRB 600 Complete SOFA 0.102 PRB 600 Complete SOFA 0.113 PRB 600 Complete SOFA 0.114 PRB 600 Complete SOFA 0.115 PRB 600 Complete SOFA 0.126 PRB 580 Complete SOFA 0.127 PRB 325 Complete SOFA 0.138 PRB 600 Complete SOFA 0.139 PRB 600 Complete SOFA 0.1410 PRB 600 Complete SOFA 0.1411 PRB 165 Complete Ext. WB 0.14 (CS)12 PRB 165 Complete Ext. WB 0.14 (CS)13 PRB 165 Complete Ext. WB 0.14 (CS)14 PRB 165 Complete Ext. WB 0.14 (CS)15 PRB 165 Complete Ext. WB 0.14 (CS)16 PRB 165 Complete Ext. WB 0.14 (CS)17 PRB 600 Complete SOFA 0.1518 PRB 600 Complete SOFA 0.1519 PRB 520 Complete In Windbox 0.1520 PRB 200 Complete SOFA 0.16

DOE NOX\Technical Papers\Clearwater_3-6-02

Conclusions

TFS 2000™ achieves good balance of NOx reduction and unburned carbon. Ultra Low NOx Integrated System achieves up to 0.03 lb/MMBtu additional NOx reduction over TFS 2000™. 0.15 lb/MMBtu can be achieved with T-firing and PRB coals.“Best” NOx reduction strategy is unit and fuel specific.

DOE NOX\Technical Papers\Clearwater_3-6-02