development economics a practical case study

10
Development Economics a practical case study Kathleen Dunmore Jo Harrison Gary Tucker Paul Brunige

Upload: belita

Post on 09-Jan-2016

26 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Development Economics a practical case study. Kathleen Dunmore Jo Harrison Gary Tucker Paul Brunige. Changing market economics. House prices (outside London and SE) are still lower than in 2007 East Midlands region of contrasts Derbyshire Dales median house price over £200,000 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Development Economics  a practical case study

Development Economics a practical case study

Kathleen DunmoreJo HarrisonGary TuckerPaul Brunige

Page 2: Development Economics  a practical case study

Changing market economics• House prices (outside London

and SE) are still lower than in 2007

• East Midlands region of contrasts– Derbyshire Dales median

house price over £200,000– Bolsover median price under

£100,000

• Development is stalling – East Midlands 15,720

units 2007/08– 9,510 units 2011/12

DCLG table 253

Page 3: Development Economics  a practical case study

3

Lessons from previous downturns

• It takes several years for recovery to commence.

• In the 1990s house prices did not recover to their 1989 peak until 1997.

• By 1938 house prices were still below their 1931 peak.

• House prices fell in 4 of the 8 years following a downturn

1930s house price crash

-12-10-8-6-4-20246

1931 1932 1933 1934 1935 1936 1937 1938

a bumpy landing in the 1990s

-10.0

-5.0

0.0

5.0

10.0

15.0

20.0

25.0

1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997

Page 4: Development Economics  a practical case study

What is a normal market ?• Historic long term house

price trend is upwards

• Fuelled by household growth and changing patterns of economic activity – spot winner and loser locations

• But over a 6 year period price change can range from zero to house prices doubled

• Plan for what – and what price localism ?

• How often to review the plan

House price change over 6 yrs

0.00

0.50

1.00

1.50

2.00

2.50

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

1=price 6 yrs ago

Page 5: Development Economics  a practical case study

5

Residual valuation model• Gross Residual =

revenue – costs

• Nett Residual (RV) = gross residual – (S106 contributions + CIL + affordable housing)

• CIL Not negotiable• On-site S106 essential• All other requirements

negotiable ??

and now CIL

Page 6: Development Economics  a practical case study

Some sites are more equal than others

• Land values are highest in the rural areas

• And lowest in the market towns

• Two 1,000 unit SUEs are proposed on the edge of the market towns. What will their values and costs be?

South Northants 45 dph no grant

£0.00£0.50£1.00£1.50£2.00£2.50£3.00£3.50£4.00£4.50

BrackleyNorthern

Hinterland

Rural SouthWest

Central Rural Northern Rural Towcester Brackley

£m

0% 10% 15% 25% 30% 35% 40% 50%

Page 7: Development Economics  a practical case study

Negotiating a stalled site

• Understand what is viable• Be clear about what you want – and how much it costs• Try not to get into a position where there is only 1

possible site for development• Understand that very big sites have higher costs and

lower values than small sites – but location is key• Development is a risky process• There are no “right answers” - only what works for you

Page 8: Development Economics  a practical case study

Principles of viability appraisal applied to specific schemes

• Calculation– Compare revenues and costs– Arrive at a calculated residual value (RV)

• Negotiation– Agree between parties what is a reasonable RV– Identify areas of uncertainty and agree how to share

risk and reward– Set up appropriate legal mechanisms

• Outcome– Improved mutual understanding and trust

5 Year Land

Supply !!

Page 9: Development Economics  a practical case study

Radstone Fields S. Northamptonshire

• 1,000 units, greenfield location edge of market town• Essential to 5 year land supply• Target

– 40% affordable housing, – CSH level 3 – high design standards - kerb stones, street furniture– New secondary school– £1m+ town centre improvements – Total cost S106 and design £20m, infrastructure £20m

(£40,000 per dwelling)

Page 10: Development Economics  a practical case study

How it worked out

The deal• Agreed 22% AH, • S106 with phased review • All uplift in RV goes to local

authority as additional affordable housing on site or as commuted sum

• Phased review encourages early start on site

Why it worked• Willing and informed

landowner and developer• Political will• Officers actively involved in

viability appraisal – not a black box

• The right size of development with no punitive infrastructure requirements

• In the right place – would it have worked in N Northants?