development donors: who they are, what they want and how to deal with them iri seminar, may 2003
TRANSCRIPT
Types and Numbers
• Three main types of donors, providing grants for international research and development:– Bilateral– Multi-lateral– Foundations
• Approximately 50 major donors; perhaps 25-30 interested in IRI-type work
Where do donors get their funds?
• Bilateral (public)– all funds from treasury of one country
• Multilateral (public)– funds from treasuries of many members
• Foundation (private)– funds from endowments formed by companies or
rich individuals
Potential IRI Donors
• Bilateral – USAID, DfID, SIDA, CIDA, Norad, AusAID
• Multilateral – IFAD, AfDB, ADB, IADB, EU
• Foundations– Rockefeller, Packard, Toyota, Gates
Where are they? (a) Multi-lateral HQs
• AfDB moving from Abidjan to Tunis
• ADB in Manila
• IADB, WB in Washington
• IFAD in Rome
• EU in Brussels
Where are they?(b) bilateral donors
• Headquarters are in national capitals
• Field offices in the capitals of host countries
• Large bilaterals often have regional offices– e.g. Nairobi, Accra, Bangkok, Delhi, Santiago
• Multi-laterals and large foundations also have field and regional offices
What sort of people?
• Public donor personnel are civil servants -- mostly educated generalists, good at pushing paper
• Large agencies employ a few scientists and/or contract with scientists to review proposals
• Donor personnel are outward looking -- interested in other countries, other cultures, seeing development happen
More on people...
• Donor people don’t think of themselves as funding sources, but as development workers.
• Donors like to be considered partners in development projects -- with valid ideas and experience.
• Donors want to see more than dollar signs in your eyes!
Donors aren’t scientists!
• Timing: Donors think in 2 - 4 year projects
(you will have to phase longer projects)
• Output: Donors want impact, not results
(you will have to think beyond results)
• Politics: Donor work is very political
(you will have to keep up with the news)
Donor Goals
• To differing extents, all dev. donors want:– poverty alleviation– protection of the environment– food security– improved quality of and access to: education, health,
information, and communications– bio-diversity
• For specific donor goals, see web sites, annual reports
Donor interests depend on politics, national culture, history
• Scandinavians like projects on environment, gender, equity.
• US likes projects involving private sector.
• French usually strong in francophone ex-colonies; UK in anglophone ex-colonies.
• Swiss like mountain countries, like Nepal
• Dutch like drainage and water projects
Donors want impact
• Impact = measurable improvements in currently bad conditions, such as:
• increased incomes for poor families
• increased nutrition of infants and mothers
• universal access to clean drinking water
• reversal of soil degradation and erosion
• decreased incidence of infectious diseases
Donors like topics that…
• are sufficiently important to be worth doing
• are internally approved (i.e. fit within your strategic plan)
• are seen as a priority by your beneficiaries
• are “managable” (i.e. there’s a good chance you’ll achieve your objectives in the project life, with the project budget)...
They also like projects that...
• have the right balance of risks and returns
• attract strong research partners that have a comparative advantage to carry out the project
• fit with the donor’s interests and grant portfolio
• are within the donor’s budget
An Important Topic...
• An important topic for a donor is one which can make a real difference in the well-being of disadvantaged people in the countries where they work.
• The more difference, and the more people helped, the better. (Remember, some donors take the bottom line and divide by the number of beneficiaries!)
Which will they choose?
• Projects can be strategic (done in a lab or office, opening up scientific doors) or applied (implemented in the real world, applying strategic results for beneficiaries)
• Which do you think a development donor would more likely want to support and why?
Answer...
• Because donors are interest in development impact, they are likely to prefer applied research topics -- closer to the beneficiaries.
• But, donors do recognize the need for strategic research to yield results that can be applied in the real world.
So...
• If you select a strategic research topic for external donor funding, you need to show, in detail, how and when the results of your work will ultimately make people better off. [Demonstrate impact.]
Large or small?
• Project size can be defined by the budget size.
• Large and small are relative to the type of project. In ag research, roughly:small = under $150,000/3years
medium = $150,000 - $350,000/3 years
large = over $350,000/3 years
Answer...
• Donors like to make as many grants as possible to spread risks, increase linkages, get more impact. (Favors small topics)
• But, grants mean lots of paperwork, meetings, decisions -- same effort for small or large projects.
• So, it depends -- donors will not necessarily choose one or the other!
Simple or Complex?
• 1- 2 objectives
• handful of sites
• limited number of partners
• Several objectives
• several sites in many countries
• several partner groups
Which will donors like?
• A simple project is more likely to succeed:– fewer things can go wrong– easier to manage– easier to achieve outputs
• But donors like to maximize participation -- like many partners
• So donors may support either type of topic!
Imagine you are a donor, and must choose among...
• A project to find a vaccine for AIDS
• A project to build 100 schools in rural Cameroon
• A project to grow substitute crops for opium in the Golden Triangle
• A project to train scientists in how to write convincing proposals
Taking into account...
• Importance of the topic to you as donor
• Priority to beneficiaries
• Manageability
• Risks and returns
• Any other considerations…
Which do you choose? Why?
Donor Intelligence ...
• Needs gathering by as many spies as possible• Needs sharing with everyone with a need to
know• Must constantly be updated• Must be managed (RMO)• Involves managers and scientists, so become
a 007 in your field
There is no substitute for personal interaction…
• You can learn from colleagues
• Or from the web, donor profiles, annual reports, etc.
• But personal interaction is still the best way of arousing donor interest.
This means visiting donors yourself...
• When traveling to conferences, on home leave, to visit projects…
• Take an extra day or two to visit donor offices for a get-to-know-each-other visit.
• You will need to set this up in advance, take support materials, and follow up afterwards.
• DON’T ASK FOR MONEY ON THE FIRST VISIT
How to have a good first visit to a donor
• Remember you are there for information, not money
• Don’t take along draft concept notes
• Do listen more than talk
• Do treat the donor as an intelligent layperson, and a potential partner
• And read Marian’s handout first!
If you have some donor interest, from a previous visit, or in
response to an RFP…
• Design a project attractive to that donor
• Write it up as a concept note
• Get it approved internally
• Get partners on board
• Send it to a donor
Only write a full proposal
• If a donor is attracted by your concept note and asks for more details, or
• If you are responding to a competitive grants program
• A full proposal takes far more time, money and effort for you to write, and the donor to read.
If the donor likes your proposal...
• You will go into negotiations -- you need to prepare in advance
• Be ready to cut your project to suit your donors needs
• If the donor can give less than you asked for, you will need to cut your objectives
• Nothing is so frustrating than an under-funded project!
If you get a grant agreement…
Maintain good donor relations by:
– reporting regularly and honestly
– telling bad news as well as good
– encouraging donor visits to project
– sounding out possible follow-on grant well in advance