developing safe shelter structures - pure - aanmelden safe shelter structures anchors & joints...
TRANSCRIPT
Developing safe shelter structures
Gijsbers, R.; de Haas, T.C.A.
Published in:IFRC-SRU Anchoring Conference, 9-10 April 2013, Luxembourg
Published: 01/01/2013
Document VersionPublisher’s PDF, also known as Version of Record (includes final page, issue and volume numbers)
Please check the document version of this publication:
• A submitted manuscript is the author's version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. There can be important differencesbetween the submitted version and the official published version of record. People interested in the research are advised to contact theauthor for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website.• The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review.• The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers.
Link to publication
General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright ownersand it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.
• Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ?
Take down policyIf you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediatelyand investigate your claim.
Download date: 10. Jul. 2018
DEVELOPING SAFE
SHELTER STRUCTURES
Anchors & Joints
IFRC-SRU Luxembourg 10-04-2013
dr. ir. R Gijsbers
ir. TCA de Haas
Contents
1. Introduction
2. (successful) Product development
3. Engineering methods
4. Shelter development requirements
5. Structural safety: Anchoring & Joints
6. Anchoring
7. Structural joints
8. Conclusions
/ Faculty of the Built Environment PAGE 1 17-4-2013
1. Introduction
/ Faculty of the Built Environment PAGE 2 17-4-2013
Faculty of the Built Environment
• Dep. of Building Technology
• Chair of Product Development (Prof. Lichtenberg)
• Shelter research
• Ir. Tim de Haas
• Ir. Mark Cox
• Dr. ir. Roel Gijsbers
• Actively involved in humanitarian sector since 2007
Ø Symposium ‘Innovative Sheltering’ @ TU/e
Ø Start of long lasting cooperation with Netherlands Red Cross
• Research Fellow: Eelko Brouwer (NLRC)
• Evolved into cooperation with a variety
of NGO’s and organizations
1. Introduction
• System design: modularity & packaging
• Shelters
• Facilities: water & sanitation
• Infrastructure: medical, energy, re-building
• Deployment & transport
• Demonstration
/ Faculty of the Built Environment PAGE 3 17-4-2013
S(P)EEDKITS has received funding from
the European Union’s Seventh
Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement n° 284931
www.speedkits.eu
2. (successful) Product Development
Possible routes
1. Out of the blue / brainstorm
2. Trial and error
3. Experience based design
4. Evidence based design
/ Faculty of the Built Environment PAGE 4 17-4-2013
TODAY AFTER
2. (successful) Product Development
What is needed? (in chronological order)
1. Well structured process planning
2. Clear picture of the stakeholders and their demands
3. Boundary conditions
4. Lessons from the State Of The Art
5. Design Brief
/ Faculty of the Built Environment PAGE 5 17-4-2013
TODAY AFTER
6. Creativity (concept designs)
7. Engineering & calculations
8. Testing (prototypes)
9. Re-engineering & re-calculations (final design)
10. Validation (pilot project)
Start of designing g
2. (successful) Product Development
/ Faculty of the Built Environment PAGE 6 17-4-2013
Step 1 to 5 Step 6 to 10
Start of designing Start of designingggggggggg
/Shelter Research Group 17-4-2013
3. Engineering methods
1. Intuition
− Tradition
− Professional experience
2. Rules of thumb
Structural element Section and top view Profile size Span Ratio
Single layer
d [mm]
l [m]
dl
Wide profile or tube steel
100-500
6-14
20-30
Profile steel
200-1000
6-40
18-26
/Shelter Research Group 17-4-2013
3. Engineering methods
3. Basic calculations
− By ‘hand’
− Basic modeling
1. Intuition
− Tradition
− Professional experience
2. Rules of thumb
4. Detailed calculations
− (3D) Computer modeling
− Detailed insight in performance of parts
Main criteria
1.General design conditions
2.Usability
3.Logistics
4.Assembly / Construction
5.Safety
6.Health
4. Shelter development requirements
/ Faculty of the Built Environment PAGE 9 17-4-2013 PAGE 917 4 2013
5. Structural safety
5. SAFETY • Burglary / Intrusion
• Fire
− Flame retardant
− Combustibility
− Generation of smoke
• Structural
− Risk profile & Safety factors (probability of failure)
− Applied loads (wind / snow / seismic / water / …)
− Material quality
− Soil characteristics
− Foundation
− Strength
− Stability (2nd order effects)
− Stiffness
/ Faculty of the Built Environment PAGE 10 17-4-2013
Anchoring
Joints
5. Structural safety
/ Faculty of the Built Environment PAGE 11 17-4-2013
Example: Warehouse shelters (“rubb halls”)
• Unawareness of (effects of) normative loads
• Underestimation of extreme (wind) loads
• Failure due to assembly mistakes:
− Anchoring not properly driven in (hard soil)
− Only half of the anchors are applied
− Assembled on unlevel surface
− Stability bracing not (properly) placed in many cases
CRITICAL: ANCHORING AND JOINTS!!!!
6. Anchoring
/ Faculty of the Built Environment PAGE 13 17-4-2013
Anchor performance in structural safety
Resistance to:
• wind pressure / suction
• Uplift forces and horizontal forces
eddy
suction
wind
Warehouse shelter
•8m span,
•5m ridge heigth
•Wind 31 m/s
(10 min average, 10m height, 5y ref. period)
6. Anchoring
/ Faculty of the Built Environment PAGE 14 17-4-2013
Performance indicators
• Soil characteristics
(Cohesive / Non cohesive)
• Anchor size
(surface)
• Anchor length / depth / angle of
insertion
• Applicability on site? Manually?
• Number of anchors
(interdependencies when
placed closely to each other)
6. Anchoring
/ Faculty of the Built Environment PAGE 15 17-4-2013
Test of Manta Ray Ground anchor
• Sandy Clay
• MR-88 anchor at 50 cm depth (45° - 80 cm length)
• Tractor with telescopic fork lift : > 600 kg (6kN)
Driving in Pull up and fixate
6. Anchoring
/ Faculty of the Built Environment PAGE 16 17-4-2013
Example: Haiti 2 Storey Shelter
• 4 m3 concrete (9600 kg) to keep house in position
• Or apply ground anchors (similar holding capacity)
6. Anchoring
/ Faculty of the Built Environment PAGE 17 17-4-2013
Example: Collective Centre
• 4 anchors per footing (total 80 kN)
• Vertical forces:Self weight and snow (downward and outward forces)
• Horizontal forces: Wind suction (uplift) and wind pressure (inward force)
H1 = 56,8 kN
V1 = 33,4 kN
α1 = 60°
D1 = 65,9 kN H1 = 56,8 kN
V1 = 33,4 kN
α1 = 45°
D1 = 80,3 kN
downward and outward forces)
7. Joints
/ Faculty of the Built Environment PAGE 18 17-4-2013
Connection Strength & Stiffness
● Strength of joint itself
- Material quality
- Production quality
- Joint type
● Rotational capacity
- Free (hinge)
- Flexible
- Rigid
7. Joints
/ Faculty of the Built Environment PAGE 19 17-4-2013
Stability
● Excessive deformation leads to unsafe situations
● Stiff planes: bracing / rigid connections
● Stability in 3 planes: xy/yz/zx
● 2nd order effect:
● loads on already deformed structure
Rigid connections
Bracing x y
z
7. Joints
/ Faculty of the Built Environment PAGE 20 17-4-2013
• Examples:
• Collective centre: rigid connections & 100% hinges
7. Joints
/ Faculty of the Built Environment PAGE 21 17-4-2013
Innovative solutions
• Building regulations and calculation procedures for ‘uncommon’ joint
types and materials do not exist.
• Proof of equivalent performance needed:
• Strength
• Rotational capacity
Lateral force
8. Conclusions
/ Faculty of the Built Environment PAGE 22 17-4-2013
Structural performance issues for safe shelters
• Lack of appropriate structural norms and calculation methods
• National building codes are based on regular and permanent buildings
• Current standards for sheltering provide unclear information for engineers
• Undefined risk profile
• Undefined or unknown level of extreme loads to be expected
• Underestimation of loads leading to unsafe solutions
• Overestimation of loads, leading to economic disadvantage
• Unknown material quality of locally available materials
• Unknown production quality of locally produced components
• Unknown construction quality of a locally assembled (self help) shelter
• Lack of specific structural expertise in the field to judge safety and reliability of
solutions within a specific context
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF ISSUES ABOVE IS ESSENTIAL
FOR DEVELOPING SAFE SHELTER STRUCTURES
dr. ir. R Gijsbers
ir. TCA de Haas
DEVELOPING SAFE
SHELTER STRUCTURES
Thank you!
IFRC-SRU Luxembourg 10-04-2013