developing gis indicators and metrics

26
Developing GIS indicators Developing GIS indicators and metrics and metrics David Theobald Natural Resource Ecology Lab Colorado State University

Upload: unity

Post on 21-Jan-2016

42 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Developing GIS indicators and metrics. David Theobald Natural Resource Ecology Lab Colorado State University. Goals of indicator development. Develop and evaluate landscape-level indicators suitable for spatial and temporal analyses of EMAP data - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

Developing GIS indicators and metricsDeveloping GIS indicators and metrics

David TheobaldNatural Resource Ecology Lab

Colorado State University

Page 2: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

Goals of indicator developmentGoals of indicator development

Develop and evaluate landscape-level indicators suitable for spatial and temporal analyses of EMAP data

Investigate limitations of currently-available data and offer new, robust methodologies

Page 3: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

Current effortCurrent effort

1. Linkage between watershed and hydrologic networks

2. Refine surrogates with direct measures of area and discharge

3. GIS-based toolsa. RWTools for ArcViewb. Catchment delineation & discharge in

ArcGIS

Page 4: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

1. Watershed–hydrological 1. Watershed–hydrological network linkagenetwork linkage“…in every respect, the valley rules

the stream.” – Hynes 1975Indirect measures based on

hydrological properties (e.g., Strahler order, drainage density, etc.)

Page 5: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

Distance:Distance:

As the crow flies (Euclidean)

Page 6: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

Distance:Distance:

As the crow flies As the seed floats

(downstream)

Page 7: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

Distance:Distance:

As the crow flies As the seed floats As the fish swims

(down & up stream)

Page 8: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

Distance:Distance:

As the crow flies As the seed floats As the fish swims

(down & up stream) Upstream length

- mainstem (2)- arbolate (1+2+3+4)

Page 9: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

Distance:Distance:

As the crow flies As the seed floats As the fish swims Upstream length Network (dams,

fragmentation)

Page 10: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

What indicators measure What indicators measure watershed-stream linkage?watershed-stream linkage?Length of stream line– Dam alteration of flow at a downstream

gauge?

RWTools extension (ArcView v3.2)

Page 11: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

Upstream66 km

Downstream298 km

MainstemUpstream37 km

Network16 km (down)6 km (up)

Page 12: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

2. Direct measures of discharge 2. Direct measures of discharge

Surrogates developed, e.g. Strahler order: The usefulness of stream order assumes, with a sufficiently large sample, that order is proportional to stream discharge – Strahler 1957

Alternatives:- basin area- discharge

Page 13: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

Delineate reach catchmentsDelineate reach catchments

Robust method (no pre-processing)1 to 1 relationship NHD reach and

catchment“Grow” watershed from reach line

based on flow direction iteratively

Page 14: Developing GIS indicators and metrics
Page 15: Developing GIS indicators and metrics
Page 16: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

Stream dischargeStream discharge

PrecipitationD = C * P

Page 17: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

10 acft

8 acft20 acft

Page 18: Developing GIS indicators and metrics
Page 19: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

R2=0.7282

P-value=3.407e-006

Page 20: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

Stream dischargeStream discharge

Encouraging preliminary resultsAdditional factors (Infiltration, E.T.): – Geology– Land cover– Exposure

D = f(C, G, L, E)

Page 21: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

3. GIS-based tools3. GIS-based tools

Interactive query and analysis of watersheds (RWTools) (ArcView v3.2)

ArcGIS Geometric network

Page 22: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

Plans for next yearPlans for next year

Initial release of GIS tools:– RWTools for ArcGIS– Functional-based spatial weights

Page 23: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

Spatial weightsSpatial weights

11 2

3 54

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0

1 0 1 0 0

0 1 0 1 0

W =

Page 24: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

Functional weighting Functional weighting

1

1 2 3

54

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0.7 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0.7 0 0 0

0.2 0.8 0 0.2 0.8 0 0

0.1 0.2 1.0 0.1 0.2 1.0 0

W =

6 7

E.g., downstream hydrology

Page 25: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

Functional weighting Functional weighting

1

1 2 3

54

0 1 0 0 0 0 0

1 0 0 0 1 1 0

0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 1 0 0

0 1 0 1 0 1 0

0 1 0 0 1 0 1

0 0 0 0 0 1 0

W =

6 7

E.g., macroinvertebrates

Page 26: Developing GIS indicators and metrics

Plans for next yearPlans for next year

Initial release of GIS tools:Perennial/intermittent frame

problem in western USDevelopment of network

fragmentation indices