detailed project report (dpr) -...

DISTRICT WATERSHED DEVELOPMENT UNIT , GANDHINAGAR [2010-11]

DETAILED PROJECT REPORT – IWMP – 7 SAMOU PROJECT

GUJARAT STATE WATERSHED MANAGEMENT AGENCY

DETAILED PROJECT REPORT (DPR)

IWMP-2010-11

DISTRICT: GANDHINAGAR

IWMP-7

(SAMOU PROJECT)

District Watershed Development Unit, Gandhinagar



Contents Table no.1: Basic project information .........................................................................................................................................................................................................7

1.2 Need of Watershed Development Programme ...................................................................................................................................................................................8

Table no.2: Weightage of the project ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................8

Table no. 2.1 Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed ..........................................................................................................................................................9

Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area .................................................................................................................................................. 11

Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area: ...................................................................................................................................................... 13

Table no. 6: PIA .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 18

Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 19

Table no. 9: Soil type and topography ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 24

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 24

Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress) ...................................................................................................................................................................... 25

Table no. 11.3: Water logging Conditions ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 26

Table no. 12: Climatic Conditions ............................................................................................................................................................................................................ 26

Table no. 13: Physiography and relief ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 27

Table no. 14: Land Ownership Details ..................................................................................................................................................................................................... 28

Table no. 15: Agriculture .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 29

Table no. 16: Irrigation ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 29

Table no. 17: Crop details ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 30

Table no. 18: Livestock ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 31



Table no. 19: Drinking water .................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 31

Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources ........................................................................................................................................................................... 32

Table no. 21: Demographic information .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 34

Table no. 22: Literacy rate ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 35

Table no. 23: Migration details ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 35

Table no. 24: Poverty ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 36

Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets .......................................................................................................................................................................................................... 37

Table no. 27: Income ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 38

Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 39

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution) ............................................................................................................................................................... 39

Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects ............................................................................................................................................ 49

Table no.31: Details of PRA Activities conducted in the project area ................................................................................................................................................... 51

Table no. 31: Watershed Committee details ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 54

Table no. 32: SHG detail ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 59

Table no. 33: UG detail .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 60

Table no.34: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) ......................................................................................................................................... 61

4.3.2. Watershed Development Works: ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 67

Table no.35: Details of activities of preparatory phase (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) .................................................................................................................. 70

Table no.36: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ........................................................................... 71

Table no.37: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ........................................................ 74

Table no. 38: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas ........................................................................................................ 75

Table no. 39: Other activities of watershed works phase – Proposed target ....................................................................................................................................... 77



Table no.40: Details of engineering structures in watershed works* ................................................................................................................................................... 78

Table no.42: Details of allied / other activities ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 82

Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas......................................................................................................................................................... 87

Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution: ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 90

Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................... 91

Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities: .................................................................................................................................................. 92

Table no. 47: Budget at a glance for the project ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 94

Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under IWMP ........................................................................................................................................ 95

Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement ............................................................................................................................................................................. 95

Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes ...................................................................................................................................................... 96

Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects ............................................................................................................................................................ 96

Table no. 52: Employment in Project area: ............................................................................................................................................................................................. 97

Table no. 53: Details of seasonal migration from Project area .............................................................................................................................................................. 97

Table no. 54: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters) ............................................................................................................. 98

Table no. 55: Status of Drinking water .................................................................................................................................................................................................... 98

Table no. 56: Details of Kharif crop area and yield in the project areas ............................................................................................................................................... 99

Table no. 57: Area under horticulture ................................................................................................................................................................................................... 100

Table no. 58: Forest/vegetative cover .................................................................................................................................................................................................. 100

Table no. 59: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in litres, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.) ...................... 101

Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 102



CHAPTER-1

PROJECT BACKGROUND



1.1 Project Background

Samou (IWMP-7) project is located in Mansa Taluka, Gandhinagar District of Gujarat. This project is a cluster

approach of 3 mini-watershed and 5 villages. Total Geographical area of 5 villages is 4146.60 ha which has been proposed

to be treated under Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP).

The project area is near to Gandhinagar district headquarter which is about 33 km from the project villages and well

connected by Mahudi road. The project includes Five villages namely Samou, Kharna, Itadra, Kuvadra & Amarapur (G).

Ratod, Patel, Thakor, Chaudhari, Muslim, Ravad, Devi pujak and Harijan communities are the primary inhabitants of the

villages. The livelihood of these people is primarily based on agriculture, animal husbandry for rearing cattle and labor

work.

The Sabarmati River flowing in Gandhinagar divides the project area. On one side the project area covers One

villages namely Amarapur.



Table no.1: Basic project information

Sr. No.

Name of the

project

Villages Gram Panchayats

Taluka District Area of the

project

Area proposed to be treated

Total project

cost PIA

Name C2K code

1

IWMP 7 Samou

Samou 060020048 950000 Samou

Mansa Gandhinagar

1441.6 1384.5 166.14

DWDU, Gandhinagar

2 Amarapur 060020048300000 Amarapur 488.4 465.7 55.884

3 Kuvadhara 060020048 030000 Kuvadhara 420.8 397.5 47.7

4 Itadara 060020048 140000 Itadara 999.3 960.0 115.2

5 Kharna 060020048 100000 Kharna 980.1 938.9 112.668

TOTAL 4330.2 4146.6 497.592

Gandhinagar District Samou Project



1.2 Need of Watershed Development Programme

Watershed Development Programme is selected on the basis of thirteen parameter namely Poverty index,

Percentage of SC/ST, Actual wages, Percentage of small and marginal farmers, Ground water status, Moisture Index, Area

under rain fed agriculture, Drinking water situation in the area, Percentage of degraded land, Productivity potential of the

land, Continuity of another watershed that has already been developed/treated, Cluster approach for plain or for hilly

terrain. Based on these thirteen parameters, a composite ranking has been given to Watershed project as given in table

no.3.

All the parameters taken together give a cumulative score of 73.5 to the watershed.

Table no.2: Weightage of the project

Project name

Project type Weightage

IWMP 7 Samou

Others

i Ii iii iv v Vi Vii viii ix x Xi xii Xiii

7.5 3 0 5 3 0 5 5 10 10 10 15 0



Table no. 2.1 Criteria and weightage for selection of watershed

Sr. No

. Criteria

Maximum score

Ranges & scores

I Poverty index (% of poor to population)

10 Above 80 % (10) 80 to 50 % (7.5) 50 to 20 % (5) Below 20 % (2.5)

Ii % of SC/ ST population 10 More than 40 % (10) 20 to 40 % (5)

Less than 20 % (3)

Iii Actual wages

5

Actual wages are significantly lower than minimum wages (5)

Actual wages are equal to or higher than

minimum wages (0)

Iv % of small and marginal farmers

10 More than 80 % (10) 50 to 80 % (5) Less than 50

% (3)

V Ground water status 5 Over exploited (5) Critical (3)

Sub critical (2)

Safe (0)

Vi Moisture index/

DPAP/ DDP Block 15

-66.7 & below (15) DDP Block

-33.3 to -66.6 (10) DPAP Block

0 to -33.2 (0) Non DPAP/ DDP Block

Vii Area under rain-fed agriculture

15 More than 90 % (15) 80 to 90 % (10) 70 to 80% (5) Above 70

% (Reject) viii

Drinking water 10 No source (10) Problematic village

(7.5) Partially

covered (5)

Fully covered

(0) ix

Degraded land 15 High – above 20 % (15) Medium – 10 to 20 %

(10)

Low- less than 10 % of TGA

(5)

x Productivity potential of

the land 15

Lands with low production & where productivity can be

significantly enhanced with reasonable efforts (15)

Lands with moderate production & where productivity can be

enhanced with

Lands with high

production & where



reasonable efforts (10) productivity can be

marginally enhanced

with reasonable efforts (5)

xi

Contiguity to another watershed that has already

been developed/ treated 10

Contiguous to previouSr.y treated watershed & contiguity within the micro watersheds in

the project (10)

Contiguity within the micro watersheds in the project but non

contiguous to previouSr.y treated

watershed (5)

Neither contiguous to previouSr.y

treated watershed

nor contiguity within the

micro watersheds in the project (0)

xii Cluster approach in the plains (more than one

contiguous micro-watersheds in the project)

15 Above 6 micro-watersheds in

cluster (15) 4 to 6 micro watersheds

in cluster (10)

2 to 4 micro watersheds in

cluster (5)

xiii Cluster approach in the

hills (more than one contiguous micro-

watersheds in the project)

15 Above 5 micro-watersheds in

cluster (15) 3 to 5 micro watersheds

in cluster (10)

2 to 3 micro watersheds in

cluster (5)

TOTAL 150 150 90 41 2.5



Table no.3: Watershed information

Name of the project No. Of watersheds to be treated Watershed code Watershed

regime/type/order

IWMP 7 3 5F1A7a##; 5F1A7b##; 5F1A7d##

Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area

Sr. No.

Village Name

Name of the programme/scheme Sponsoring

agency Objectives of the

programme/scheme Year of

commencement

Estimated number of

beneficiaries

1 Samou

MGNREGA DRDA Employment generation 2009-10 50

INDIRA AAVAS YOJNA DRDA Provide Resident 2008-11 101

SARDAR AAVAS YOJNA DRDA Provide Resident 1990-08 70

SECTOR REFORM SCHEME WASMO Drinking Water Facility 2009-10 All Villagers

T.S.C DRDA Construction of Toilets 2011 300

2 Amarapur




PANDIT DINDAYAL AAVAS YOJNA DRDA Provide Resident 2009-10 4

AMBEDKAR AAVAS YOJNA DRDA Provide Resident 2008 5


T.S.C DRDA Construction of Toilets 2008-11 5

3 Kuvadhara MGNREGA DRDA Employment generation 2009-10 424







T.S.C DRDA Construction of Toilets 2010-11

4 Itadara






5 Kharna





AMBEDKAR AAVAS YOJNA DRDA Provide Resident 2001-05 3





Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area:

Sr. No.

Project name

Year started

Name of

villages

No. Of micro

watershed

Watershed

codes

Area under

treatment

Funding source

Nodal agency

PIA Total cost

Expenditure incurred up

to start of IWMP

% financial completion

% physical completion

- - - - - - - - - - - - - -



CHAPTER – 2

PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY



2.1. Project Implementing Agency:-

The Project Implementing Agency (PIA) is being selected by an appropriate mechanism by State Level Nodal Agency

(SR.NA). PIAs would be responsible for implementation of watershed project. These PIAs may include relevant line

departments, autonomous organizations under State/ Central Governments, Government Institutes/ Research bodies,

Intermediate Panchayat, Voluntary Organizations (VOs). The PIA of Samou Watershed project is District Watershed

Development Unit, Gandhinagar.

2.2 About District Watershed Development Unit, Gandhinagar:-

2.2.1 The organization and its objectives:

The District Watershed Development Unit, Gandhinagar is a district level nodal agency and was established on 6th

January 2010 to oversee for the smooth implementation of watershed projects in the district. The District Development

Officer (DDO) is the chairman of the DWDU. The DWDU have dedicated and experience staffs comprising one Project

Manager (deputed from Gujarat Forest Department) and multi disciplinary team of Agriculture Expert, Civil Engineer, MIS

coordinator, System Analyst, Surveyor, Computer Operator, Accountant and Community Mobilization Expert are recruited.



The DWDU, Gandhinagar office is temporarily within District Watershed Development Unit at Balvantray Mehta Panchayat

Bhavan, 2nd Floor, Near District Panchayat Office, Sector - 17. The objectives of DWDU, Gandhinagar are supervising,

planning, implementing, documenting and promoting watershed development projects and related development activities

in the district. Moreover, DWDU, Gandhinagar will work as PIA for an IWMP – 7 Samou project from the year 20010 – 11.

2.2.2 Programmers/ project running in the district:-

At present, three IWMP projects have been sanctioned by MORD, GOI, and New Delhi for Gandhinagar district. The entry

point activities of all the three IWMP projects have been identified by the respective PIAs in the district. DWDU,

Gandhinagar itself works as a PIA for all the three projects in Gandhinagar district. Apart from running three projects, total

30 Hariyali projects (IWDP) have been sanctioned and are still running since 2003-04 in the district till foreclosure in

December 2012. DWDU, Gandhinagar is also monitoring a Central Groundwater Board central government sponsored

scheme on "Artificial Recharge of Groundwater through Dug wells" in the district by organizing meeting, seminar & field

exposure for demonstration structure under I.E.C activities.



2.2.3 SWOT (Strength, Weakness, Opportunities & Threats) Analysis of the DWDU

Strength:

(1) Dedicated and experience staff

(2) Independent District Level Nodal Agency

(3) Strong linkages with national and state level institutions, agricultural universities, North Gujarat University and NGOs

for capacity building and technical guidance

(4) Scientific planning in watershed projects with the help of BISAG, Gandhinagar

(5) District level monitoring, coordination and cooperation committee

(6) Well establishment of PRIs for social audits

Weakness:

(1) Insufficient funds for complete watershed projects per hectare

(2) No permanent staff

(3) No permanent office building

Opportunities:

(1) Sustainable livelihood generation by landless and asset less



(2) Improvement of socio economic status of poor

(3) Awareness generation among the illiterates through IEC activities by usage of new ICT activities.

(4) Usage of new technologies of watershed modelling and GPS for monitoring the watershed activities.

Threats:

(1) Lack of sustainable agriculture development

(2)Lack of contribution and cooperation from local peoples

Table no. 6: PIA

Sr. No. Names of project Details of PIA

1 IWMP 7

(Samou Project)

(i) Type of organization Government

(ii) Name of organization DWDU, Gandhinagar

(iii) Designation & Address Project Manager

(iv) Telephone 02763 – 272255

(v) Fax 079 – 23247442

(vi) E-mail [email protected]

mailto:[email protected]



Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level

Sr. No

Name Age Sex Designation Qualification Experience Job assigned Monthly

remuneration

1 Mr. P C. Pathak 55 M Project Director B Sc. 32 Yrs. Project Management 54,483/-

2 Mr. R R. Maraviya 27 M Technical Expert B. Tech., MBA 2.5 Yrs. Monitoring & to assist in

project management 33,000/-

3 Mr. Bhushan Parmar 27 M Technical Expert B.Sc. Agri. MBA 2.5 Yrs Monitoring & to assist in

project management 30,800/-

3 Mr. Dhaval Raval 26 M Executive Assistant

B. Com., M. Com, MS Office,

Tally, W.C.C. 5 Yrs. Back office work 5,000/-

4 Mrs. Dipikaben Patel 33 F MDT –

Community Mobilizer

BRS, CCC 11 Yrs. SHG & Social awareness

programmes 15,000/-

5 Mrs. Mokshaben Joshi 24 F MDT –

Community Mobilizer

MSW, CCC+, Lab. Tech. Certificate

2 Yrs. SHG & Social awareness

programmes 9,000/-

6 Mr. Kiranbhai Patel 37 M MDT –

Agriculture BRS, MS Office 10 Yrs.

Agriculture activity & supervision

15,000/-

7 Mr. Satish Patel 28 M MIS Co –

ordinator MCA 6 Yrs. Maintain data cell 15,000/-

8 Ms. Swejalben Patel 28 F MDT – Accounts B. Com, Tally 6 Yrs. 4 Months.

Accounts 8,000/-



9 Mr. Mehul J. Patel 22 M MDT – DEO D.C.A. 3 Yrs. Maintain Data Cell 6,000/-

10 Patel Rajeshbhai B. 32 M WDT – Accounts M.com, M.ed 6 Yrs. Accounts 7000/-

11 Chudhari Aswainkumar R.

26 M WDT –

Agriculture MRM 6 Yrs.

Agriculture activity & supervision

8000/-

12 Chudhari Ramilaben A.

41 F WDT –

Community Mobilizer

MRS 18 Yrs. SHG & Social awareness

programmes 8000/-

13 Patel Devendra A. 26 M WDT – DEO PGDCA 3 Yrs. Maintain Data Cell 5000/-

14 Patel Mehulkumar B. 23 M Messenger 12th Pass 6 Months Back office work 3000/-



CHAPTER – 3

BASIC INFORMATION OF THE PROJECT AREA:



3.1. Geography and Geo-hydrology

Samou watershed is located in Gandhinagar district about 30 kms from district headquarters. The project area is

characterized by high temperature and moderate rainfall. The project area has Sabarmati river flowing. The project area is

4146.60 ha and is being proposed to be treated under watershed programmed. Most of the inhabitants procure drinking

water through tap water of Gram Panchayat.

3.1.1 Land use pattern

The net geographical area of IWMP-VII Samou is about 4330.2 ha and has no forest cover but sporadic vegetative

cover. About 83 % i.e., 3605 ha of land is under agricultural use out of which 4.2% i.e., 184 ha is under rain fed area. The

wasteland in the project area is around 10.3% i.e., 448 ha. Mostly the crops being taken up in the project area are Cotton,

Bajra, Tobacco, Pulses, Wheat, Paddy, Maize, Jowar and Sugarcane during Rabi & Kharif season



Table no. 8: Land use pattern

Sr. No.

Names of villages

Geographical Area of the

village Forest Area

Land under agricultural

use Rainfed area

Permanent pastures

Wasteland

Cultivable Non-cultivable

1 Samou 1441.6 0 1308.4 10.0 127.55 127.55 5.7

2 Amarapur 488.4 0 199.8 0.0 11.4 11.4 0.7

3 Kuvadhara 420.8 0 378.3 78.3 22.2 22.2 20.4

4 Itadara 999.3 0 942.7 6.4 40.0 40.0 16.5

5 Kharna 980.1 0 776.1 89.7 87.3 87.3 116.7

TOTAL 4330.2 0 3605.0 184.0 288.0 288.0 160.0

3.1.2 Soil and topography

Samou watershed project falls under North Gujarat agro climatic zone. The soil is sandy and Golralu. It retains

moisture to some extent. The soil is good for horticulture and fairly ample growth of fruit and other ornamental trees in

this area. Of the cultivated area, 60% of the area grows food crops among which Bajra, Jowar, Wheat, and Vegetable crops

are important. Cotton is the main non food (cash crop). Bajra,Jowar, Paddy and Castor are known as Kharif crops as they

are rained crops. Among them Paddy requires an additional watering at regular intervals.



Table no. 9: Soil type and topography

Sr. No.

Agro-climatic zone covers project area

Area in ha Names of the

villages

Major soil types Topography

a) Type b) Area in ha

1

North Gujarat

1441.6 Samou

Goradu

1308.4

Plain

2 488.4 Amarapur 199.8

3 420.8 Kuvadhara 378.3

4 999.3 Itadara 942.7

5 980.1 Kharna 776.1

TOTAL 4330.2 3605.0

Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition

Sr. no Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence)

1 Samou 1972/1996/2006 -

2 Amarapur 1972/1996/2007 -

3 Kuvadhara 1972/1996/2007 -

4 Itadara 1996 -

5 Kharna 1996 -



Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress)

Name of the Village Soil pH Type of Salinity (Inherent/Ingress)

Samou 7.8

Inherent

Amarapur 7.5

Kuvadhara 8.0

Itadara 7.5

Kharna 7.0

PH: Alkaline < 5.5, Normal 5.5 to 8.2, Ash > 8.2 Salinity: Normal < 1, Less Hazardous 1 to 3, Hazardous > 3

(Source: Director of Agriculture)



Table no. 11.3: Water logging Conditions

Name of the Village Reasons

Samou

Low permeability and Poor Soil Structure

Amarapur

Kuvadhara

Itadara

Kharna

Table no. 12: Climatic Conditions

Name of project Average rainfall- last 5 years

Average Temperature

Summer Winter

IWMP – 7 750 – 850 mm

Max oC Min oC Max oC Min oC

45 35 22 15



Table no. 13: Physiography and relief

Project name Elevation Sr.ope range (%) Major streams

IWMP – 7 SAMOU

81 MSL 1-1.5% Sabarmati River

3.1.3 Land and Agriculture

The land of Gandhinagar district is fertile and agriculture can be taken up in the area. The ground water depth is

around 200-300 m and runoff of the soil is not conspicuous. The temperature lies between 15-45 0C and rainfall ranges

from 750 – 850 mm.

The indiscriminate exploitation of land, water & vegetation has degraded and reduced the productivity. Ground

water has become the major source of drinking water as well as irrigation purpose due to its ubiquitous occurrence, easy

availability & reliability. Although chronologically it is fewer droughts prone compared to Saurashtra & Kutch regions.



The average land holding is about 0.17 ha. Migration ratio of farmers in the region is zero enabling them to ensure

their livelihood without much affecting the demographic profile of the village.

Table no. 14: Land Ownership Details

Sr. no

Village Total owned land HHs giving

land on lease

HHs taking land on

lease Gen OBC SC ST

1 Samou 250 973.36 75 - Nil Nil

2 Amarapur 68.80 261.40 0.5 - Nil Nil

3 Kuvadhara 185 190 0 - Nil Nil

4 Itadara 873 75 12 - Nil Nil

5 Kharna 586.91 89.5 10 - Nil Nil

TOTAL 1963.71 1589.26 97.5 - Nil Nil

Source: Baseline Survey.



Table no. 15: Agriculture

Sr. no Village Net sown area ( Ha.)

One time Two times Three times

1 Samou 1308.4 824.292 235.512

2 Amarapur 199.8 125.874 35.964

3 Kuvadhara 378.3 238.329 68.094

4 Itadara 942.7 593.901 169.686

5 Kharna 776.1 488.943 139.698

TOTAL 3605.3 2271.339 648.954

Table no. 16: Irrigation

Sr. no

Village

Source 1 : Canal ( Census Book ) Source 2 : Pond Source 3 : Well

Availability months

Net area

Gross area

Availability months

Net area

Gross area

Availability months

Net area Gross area

1 Samou Nil Nil Nil 2 4 4 Nil Nil Nil

2 Amarapur Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil

3 Kuvadhara Nil Nil Nil 2 2.1 2.1 Nil Nil Nil

4 Itadara Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil

5 Kharna Nil Nil Nil 2 3 3 Nil Nil Nil



Table no. 17: Crop details

Sr. no

Village Name

Kharif (Monsoon) Rabi (Winter) Zaid (Summer)

Crop 1 Cotton Crop 2 Wheat Crop 3 Bajara

Area Production

(Kg) Productivity

(Kg/Ha.) Area

Production (Kg)

Productivity (Kg/Ha.)

Area Production

(Kg) Productivity

(Kg/Ha.)

1 Samou

666 199800 1082 420 168000 771 200 80000 618

2 Amarapur


100 30000 398 85 42500 259 45 15300 208

3 Kuvadhara


170 57800 339 190 133000 221 30 36000 177

4 Itadara Crop 1 Cotton Crop 2 Wheat Crop 3 Bajara

250 75000 820 220 68000 535 330 118800 428

5 Kharna


185 55500 802 160 80000 523 108 75600 419



Table no. 18: Livestock

Sr. No

Village Buffalo Cow

Total Milk (Buffalo+Cow)

Goat Sheep Bullock Hen Others

No milk No Milk Lit/Day No Milk

1 Samou 3000 7500 2500 8750 16250 200 170 120 300 500 0

2 Amarapur 468 1170 70 280 1450 90 70 0 30 0 0

3 Kuvadhara 600 1500 300 400 1900 250 220 270 22 0 0

4 Itadara 600 3000 586 2930 5930 500 428 20 22 0 0

5 Kharna 917 4585 1484 11872 16457 55 55 30 40 0 0

TOTAL 5585 17755 4940 24232 41987 1095 943 440 414 500 0

Table no. 19: Drinking water

Sr. no

Village Ground water table (mt) Source of drinking water Availability in months Quality

1 Samou 228 Tube Well 12 Medium

2 Amarapur 173.78 Tube Well 12 Medium

3 Kuvadhara 210 Tube Well 12 Medium

4 Itadara 240.24 Tube Well 10 Medium

5 Kharna 210.21 Tube Well 10 Medium



Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources

S. No.

Names of project

CPR Particulars

Total Area (ha) Area owned/ In possession of

Area available for treatment (ha)

Pvt. persons Govt.

(specify deptt.)

PRI Any other

(Pl. Specify) Pvt.

Persons

Govt. (specify deptt.)

PRI Any other

(Pl. Specify)

1 Samou

Wasteland/ degraded land - - - - -

Pastures - 30.12 22.40

Orchards -

Village Woodlot -

Forest - - - - - - - -

Village Ponds/ Tanks - 260.00 - 125.39

Community Buildings - 2.5 - - - - -

Weekly Markets - - - - - - -

Permanent markets - - - - - - -

Temples/ Places of worship - - - - - - -

Others (Pl. specify) -

- - - - - -

--



3.2 Socio-Economic Profile

3.2.1 Demographic Status

Samou watershed project mainly covers Five villages namely Samou, Kharna, Itadra, Kuvadra & Amarapur(G).

which has total 4966 household with a net population (as per base-line survey) with 10746 males and 10061 females. The

sex ratio is about 685 females to 1000 males. There are about 1543 BPL families. The average family size is of five

members. The literacy rate is 65.87 percent with male literacy rate of 73.84 percent and a female literacy rate 55.04

percent.

The major castes in these villages are Patels, Thakors, Rabari, Harijan and others. Majority of population is involved in

agriculture and animal husbandry.



Table no. 21: Demographic information

Sr. no Village

Population SC ST

Total Male Female Total Male Female % Total Male Female %

1 Samou 6655 3343 3212 120 118 112 1.8 0 0 0 0

2 Amarapur 1836 1042 794 293 184 113 15.9 75 40 35 4.08

3 Kuvadara 1974 1028 946 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

4 Itadara 7617 3936 3681 500 197 177 6.56 0 0 0 0

5 Kharna 2825 1397 1428 65 78 68 2.3 15 8 7 0.75

TOTAL 20907 10746 10061 910 578 470 5.31 90 48 42 -



Table no. 22: Literacy rate

Sr. no Village Literacy

Total % Male % Female %

1 Samou 3978 60.68 2285 68.35 1693 52.70

2 Amarapur 1221 66.50 818 78.50 403 50.75

3 Kuvadara 1279 64.79 760 73.92 519 54.86

4 Itadara 5159 67.73 3016 76.62 2143 58.21

5 Kharna 1836 64.99 1056 75.59 780 54.62

TOTAL 13473 65.87 7935 73.84 5538 55.04

Table no. 23: Migration details <

Sr. no

Village Total

population

Migration Migration by months Main reason

for migration

Income during migration /

month Total Male Female Up to 3 months

3-6 months

More than 6

months

1 Samou 6655 105 80 25 105 - -

For

Employment

in Horticulture

area.

3750 - 4280 Rs.

2 Amarapur 1836 35 20 15 - 35 -

3 Kuvadhara 1974 14 8 6 -

4 10

4 Itadara 7617 0 0 0 0 0 0

5 Kharna 2825 28 15 13 18 10 -

Total 20907 182 123 59 123 49 10



Table no. 24: Poverty

Sl no Village Total

Household

BPL % of BPL HH

Total Land less HH

% of land less HH

0-16 16-20 Total

1 Samou 1945 120 205 305 15.68 945 48.58

2 Amarapur 394 61 139 200 50.76 277 70.30

3 Kuvadhara 457 103 180 283 61.92 247 54.04

4 Itadara 1480 322 238 560 37.83 345 23.31

5 Kharna 690 110 85 195 28.26 320 46.37

TOTAL 4966 716 847 1543 31.07 2134 42.97

Infrastructure facilities

Samou watershed is well connected to Gandhinagar headquarters with Mahudi roads. The villages have electricity

connection and nearly 100 per cent of households in the village have their personal electric meters. Five villages have a

primary school and for higher secondary education, the students have to go to Amrapur, Mansa, Gandhinagar & Naroda

which is about 20 kilometres away.



Table no. 25: Village infrastructure

Sr. no

Village

Pucca road

to the village (Y/N)

Schools Colleges

(Number) Post Office (Distance)

Banks (Number)

Distance from

nearest market

yard

Milk collection

centre (Number)

Milk cooperative

(Number)

Other cooperatives

/ CBIs (Number)

Any other institution

LP UP HS

1 Samou Y Y Y Y 0 1 2 15 3 1 0 0

2 Amarapur Y Y Y Y 1 1 0 15 1 1 1 0

3 Kuvadhara Y Y Y Y 0 0 0 12 1 1 1 2

4 Itadara Y Y Y Y 0 1 1 6 1 1 1 3

5 Kharna Y Y Y Y 0 1 1 3 1 1 0 0

Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets

Sr. no

Village HHs with

electricity

HHs with

safety latrines

HHs with phones HHs with vehicle HHs

with TV set

HHs with

cooking gas

HHs with Drinking

water

HHs with fridge

Land line

Mobile 2-

wheeler 4-wheeler

1 Samou 1200 700 50 500 70 40 90 400 1200 120

2 Amarapur 394 200 10 135 20 9 30 85 350 10

3 Kuvadhara 1974 0 12 420 28 4 328 80 380 32

4 Itadara 2414 1560 300 760 14 13 350 1670 2414 1560

5 Kharna 690 437 25 675 35 20 220 105 600 100

TOTAL 6672 2897 397 2490 167 86 1018 2340 4944 1822



3.3. Livelihood pattern

The villagers earn their livelihood from animal husbandry and agriculture and during lean seasons they go as daily

wage labourers at elsewhere for earning. So, the economies of these rural villages basically depend upon agriculture &

animal husbandry through dairy co-operatives. Machinery & equipments other than transport equipments, metal products

parts except machinery & equipment, non-metallic mineral products & food products are the main non agriculture

economic activities adjoining to the urban areas of the district.

Table no. 27: Income

Village Agriculture

(Lakhs ) Animal husbandry

Casual labour

Others Total

Samou 253.08 204.375 6.37 3.6 467.43

Amarapur 38 20.49 1.34 0 59.83

Kuvadhara 64.6 26.7 1.57 8.1 100.97

Itadara 95 75.765 4.23 0.6 175.60

Kharna 70.3 193.431 2.12 0.9 266.75

TOTAL 520.98 520.761 15.63 13.2 1070.57



Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR

Sr. no

Village

Benefit type 1

Benefit type 2

Benefit type 3 Total income

% sells Income % sells Income % sells Income

1 Samou

Nil 2 Amarapur

3 Kuvadhara

4 Itadara

5 Kharna

Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution)

Sr. no

Village Total

workforce Agriculture

Animal husbandry

(AH)

Agriculture + AH

Casual labor

Services Handicraft Others

1 Samou 3152 890 685 700 600 250 0 27

2 Amarapur 487 117 100 80 180 10 0 0

3 Kuvadhara 648 247 36 180 150 15 20 0

4 Itadara 2692 870 560 560 612 30 60 0

5 Kharna 1545 370 290 290 320 250 25 0

TOTAL 8524 2494 1671 1810 1862 555 105 27



Problems faced in Agriculture

1. Urbanization of existing land:

As Gandhinagar district is the capital of Gujarat state, the villages situated in and around the area are being

urbanized. Most of the agricultural land is being made into residential area and construction made for commercial purpose.

Due to this, the agricultural production is also decreasing.

2. Degradation of land by high use of fertilizers:

With high of chemical fertilizers, the fertile agricultural land is getting degraded and as a result it leads to soil pollution.

The farmers should be made aware of the use of biofertilizers instead of chemical fertilizers.

3. Traditional farming methods:

This is the factor that leads low productivity. There is lot of ignorance about the use of new farming methods and

technologies such as multiple cropping. They don’t use FYM and other input in a proper way that is why they don’t get

100% output.



4. Lack of adequate machinery:

Even today a large number of farmers use wooden ploughs and bullocks. They don’t have adequate machinery like seed

drill etc. The old machinery takes more time in tillage practices. So it leads to low productivity.

5. Lack of finances for farmers:

In Samou project area, most of farmers are marginal and small. Farmers do not have enough resources to purchase these

seed.

6. Lack of good quality seeds and fertilizers:

Good quality seed, fertilizer and pesticide are important factor in agriculture productivity. The use of good quality leads to

higher land productivity. The farmers should be made aware and must be encouraged to go for good quality seeds,

fertilizers and pesticides when necessary.



7. Lack of rural credit:

Farmers face so many problems for rural credit and it leads to low agricultural productivity. Farmers need credit mainly

for the purchase of various inputs such as seed, fertilizers, and pesticides and for repair of implements. They use long term

credit for buying land, and for investment to improve the quality of land, buying the new implements and improving

irrigation facilities.



CHAPTER – 4

WATERSHED ACTIVITIES



Watershed Activities

Watershed management as a strategy is been adapted by Government of India especially in the rain fed regions of

semi-arid tropics. These regions are characterized by low and undependable rain, low soil fertility, poor infrastructure

development, low literacy and less incidence of migration. The Inheritant low fertility of crops results in high productivity

of crops which have a very low biological efficiency.

Several studies have identified that there is a need of a systematic and scientific approach to deal with watershed

development. The common guidelines generate a fresh and flexible framework for the next generation in enhancing the

watershed developmental agro-horti based, forestry based & dairy developmental activities for livelihood interventions.

4.1. Scientific Planning

1. Cluster Approach

This envisages a broader vision of Geo-hydrological unit which involves treating a cluster of micro-watershed.

The Samou Watershed Project consists of Three micro- watersheds namely 5F1A7a##; 5F1A7b## & 5F1A7d## as



their respective codes. Further Samou watershed project is in continuation with other watershed projects namely

Isanpur Mota, Halisa & Madhavgadh Projects. This gives an element of continuation of the programme.

2. Base line Survey (Holistic Approach)

To access the impact of any watershed development programme, a detailed baseline survey has to be

conducted. This acts a benchmark for any intervention during and post implementation of any development

programme. A detailed baseline survey has been undertaken which involved household census survey, Bio-physical

survey and Village level data collection from Village Panchayat Talati –cum mantri. Household census survey

includes a detailed questionnaire which has been filled by visiting each and every house-hold in the village. This gave

in the details of the demographic profile of the village, the literacy percentage, SC/ST population, number of BPL

household, livestock population, and Net consumption rate in the village, average milk production of the cattle’s and

various schemes running and their benefits to be accrued.



Bio-physical survey has been undertaken to identify various natural resources available in the village. It

included the soil typology, various irrigation networks in the area, crop taken in the field, Cropping pattern, bio

fertilizer, fertilizer used and various sources of irrigation in the field.

3. Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA)

The past experience of watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating accountability of the 44

Stakeholders towards the programme. This has created an emphasis to include all the stakeholders’ communities

and their local and indigenous Technological Knowledge (ITK) while planning for any activity. Participatory

approach provides a new path for planning, implementing, and monitoring and post- withdrawal activities with a

complete accountability of the stakeholders. This decrease the effort of the ground staff i.e. WDT members and

involves more of villagers as implementers. Various PRA techniques like resource mapping, social mapping, and

seasonal calendars were used to understand the physical and social orientation of the village in general and in

watershed specifically. These tools put the villagers in ease than the complicated questionnaires. Various tools like

Matrix ranking, Venn diagram were used to identify various local vegetations (apt for afforestation), introduction of



economically viable plant species, Fodders crops, various active institutions and their significance in the life of the

rural farmers.

4. Use of GIS and Remote sensing for Cartographic planning

Use of various high scientific tools has been promoted extensively at various stages of watershed development.

a) Prioritization

Geographical Information System (GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various layer maps like

topographical maps, geographical map, cadastral map, thematic maps i.e., vegetation, density, & Sr.ope maps for

collecting coordinates & altitude of ware points were created. For Geo-morphological, Soil, BPL Population, SC/ST

population, Canal, Roads, Rivers, Ground water Status, Nurseries, Check dams, Boribund, Cross bund, Drinking water

situation Sr.ope percent. These were all given proper weightages according to the DoLR specification. This helped in

prioritization of various watershed areas.



b) Planning

A action plan matrix was been formulated by State Level Nodal Agency(SR.NA) taking into account various

features like the Sr.ope percent, soil Depth, Soil Texture, Soil erosion in the area for wasteland, forest land and

agricultural land.

Global positioning System (GPS) was used to identify each and every water conservation structures available in

the project area. This will be used to create a map. Contour Map of vertical interval of 1 meter at a scale of 1:8000

was used for identifying various location specific for soil and water conservation structures.

c) Hydrological modelling

Hydrology modelling technique has been used for locating drainage, stream length, flow direction, sink, and Flow

accumulation. This model overlaid over cadastral map Hel to calculate the catchment area of each structures like the

check dam etc. This has helped to remove the human error which generally occurring while calculating the

catchment area of a check dam precisely.



Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects

S. No. Scientific criteria/ inputs used Whether scientific criteria was used

(A) Planning

Cluster approach Yes

Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged? If yes, mention the name of the Institute

Baseline survey Yes

Hydro-geological survey Yes

Contour mapping Yes

Participatory Net Planning (PNP) Yes

Remote sensing data-especially soil/ crop/run-off cover Yes

Ridge to Valley treatment Yes

Online IT connectivity between

(1) Project and DRDA cell/ZP Yes

(2) DRDA and SR.NA Yes

(3) SR.NA and DoLR Yes

Availability of GIS laYrs.

1. Cadastral map Yes

2. Village boundaries Yes

3. Drainage Yes

4. Soil (Soil nutrient status) Yes



5. Land use Yes

6. Ground water status Yes

7. Watershed boundaries Yes

8. Activity Yes

Crop simulation models

Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high speed soil nutrient analysis

Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)

Weather Station Yes

(B) Inputs

1. Bio-pesticides

2. Organic manures

3. Vermicompost Yes

4. Bio-fertilizer Yes

5. Water saving devices Yes

6. Mechanized tools/ implements Yes

7. Bio-fencing

8. Nutrient budgeting Yes

9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers

Any other (please specify)



Table no.31: Details of PRA Activities conducted in the project area

Sr.

No.

Village Name

Name of the PRA Activity /

FGD Date

Number

of

people

present

Lessons learnt / Understanding of the problem/situation

1 SAMOU

Animal Husbandry Group

17/10/2011 52

Lack of the cost of food and fodder for Animal is not reliable for

Animal Husbandry

Farmer Group Law production of Agriculture Product because of deepest level of

Ground Water table

Social Group Mainly Chaudhari & Chavda Community Residing

2

AMARAPUR


08/09/2011 56

High input Cost & Low Milk Production; Requirement of Good

Quality Animal Breed

Farmer Group High Agriculture Production but High input Cost

Social Group Mainly Rathod Community; The Village have big Temple of

Amarnathdham at Gujarat Truism.

3

KUVADRA


28/09/2011 42

Lack of the cost of food and fodder for Animal is not reliable for

Animal Husbandry

Farmer Group High Agriculture Production but High input Cost

Women Group Comparative Low education

4

Animal Husbandry Group 25/10/2011 35 High input Cost & Low Milk Production; Requirement of Good




ITADRA

Farmer Group

Law production of Agriculture Product because of high use of

Pesticides Medicines. Low Quality of Agriculture Land

Social Group Mainly Momidian & Patel Community between Disputes.

5

KHARNA


12/09/2011 48

High input Cost & Low Milk Production; Requirement of Good


Farmer Group High Agriculture Production but High input Cost; No Labour

Work.

Social Group Mainly Patel & Thakor Community Residing

# Only the letter assigned, as below, needs to be typed, except for `J’, where the type may be specifically mentioned.

A. PNP and PRA B. Planning

C. Maintenance of Accounts D. Signing of cheques and making payments



E. Supervision of construction activities F. Cost Estimation

G. Verification & Measurement H. Record of labour employed

I. Social Audit J. Any other (please specify).

Institution formation in Watershed

4.2.1 Watershed Committee (WC)

It is a committee that is constituted by Gram Sabha to implement the watershed project with technical support of WDT

in the village. This committee is registered under society Registration Act 1860. The Gram sabha of the village selects

the chairman of the watershed committee with the secretary who will be a paid functionary. The Watershed

Committees were formed accordingly in the Five villages of Samou project. The watershed committee has a pivotal role

during various processes like the PRA and overall planning of various points.



Table no. 31: Watershed Committee details

Sr. No

.

Names of WCs

Date of Registration as a Society

(dd/mm/ yyyy)

NAME Designat

ion M/F

SC

ST

GEN

OBC

SF

MF

LF

Land-

less

UG

SHG

GP

Any othe

r

Educa-

tional qualif

i-cation

AGE

1 KHARNA

PATEL MAHENDRABHAI G. President M

Y

Y

KH

AR

NA

GR

AM

PA

NC

HA

YA

T

12 51

SOLANKI SHIRISHCHNDRA N.

Secretary M Y

Y

BA 24

PATEL MANEKLAL B. Member M

Y

Y

BA 63

PARMAR DEVENDRAKUMAR

Member M Y

Y

BA 45

THAKOR MANGUBEN C. Member F

Y

Y

Y

4 42

RABARI AJMALBHAI S. Member M

Y Y

10 43

PATEL RASIKLAL B. Member M

Y

Y

11 57

MAKVANA VARSANGJI P. Member M

Y Y

7 55

RAVAL SAVITABEN G. Member F

Y

Y

Y

4 47

BAROT HARSHADKUMAR R. Member M

Y Y

5 42

PARMAR CHHAGANBHAI G. Member M Y

Y

7 52

PATEL DHAHYABHAI S. Member M

Y

Y

10 58

CHAUDHARI ASHVINKUMAR

WDT M

Y

MRM 27



Sr. No.

Names of WCs


(dd/mm/ yyyy)

NAME Designation M/F SC ST GEN OBC SF MF LF Land-less

UG SHG GP Any

other

Educa-tional

qualifi-cation

AGE

2 SAMOU

CHAUDHARI BALDEVBHAI L. President M Y Y

SAM

OU

GR

AM

PA

NC

HA

YA

T

10 52

JANI DURGESHKUMAR R. Secretary M Y Y 10 43

CHAVADA LAXMANJI VILUJI Member M Y Y 10 51

CHAVADA NIRUBEN BHARATJI Member F

Y Y Y 8 43

GOHIL KAMARABEN K. Member F Y Y 10 39

THAKOR TAKHUJI MAGANJI Member M Y Y 2 56

PATEL RAJUBHAI N. Member M Y Y 10 46

CHAUDHRTI MADHABHAI P. Member M Y Y 10 56

CHAVADA BHANUJI JAVANJI Member F Y Y 9 53

CHAUDHARI MANILAL V. Member M Y SUVERY 68

MISHTRI HIMATBHAI B. Member M Y Y 10 56

THAKOR DHIRAJI SAGANJI Member M Y Y MA 36

CHAUDHARI ASHVINKUMAR R. WDT M MRM 27



Sr. No

.

Names of WCs


(dd/mm/ yyyy)

NAME Designatio

n M/F

SC

ST

GEN

OBC

SF

MF

LF

Land-less

UG

SHG

GP Any othe

r

Educational qualificatio

n

AGE

3 KUVADRA

PATEL ARVINDBHAI D. President M Y Y

KU

VA

DR

A G

RA

M P

AN

CH

AY

AT

10 49

MAKWANA MANUJI SARDARJI

Secretary M Y Y 12 59

MAKWANA CHATURSINH M. Member M Y Y BA 66

MAKWANA DHULAJI LAXMANJI

Member M Y Y 7 45

PATEL DINESHBHAI I. Member M Y Y 10 40

PATEL RANCHHODBHAI N. Member M Y Y Y 4 60

PATEL SAVITABEN R. Member F Y Y Y 5 52

MAKWANA SAKRIBEN N. Member F Y Y 58

PATEL SANTABEN JIVANDAS

Member F Y Y 5 60

MAKWANA BABUJI UDAJI Member M Y Y 12 35

MAKWANA PRADHANJI KALAJI

Member M Y Y 7 58

CHAUDHARI ASHVINKUMAR R.

WDT M Y MRM 27



Sr. No

.

Names of WCs

Date of Registratio

n as a Society

(dd/mm/ yyyy)

NAME Designatio

n M/F

SC

ST

GEN

OBC

SF

MF

LF

Land-less

UG

SHG

GP Any othe

r

Educa-tional qualifi-cation

AGE

4 AMRAPU

R

RATHOD JIVANJI DAJUJI President M Y Y

AM

RA

PU

R G

RA

M P

AN

CH

AY

AT

8 55

RATHOD BABUJI JIVAJI Secretary M Y Y 9 30

RATHOD JILUJI GOPALI Member M Y Y PTC 60

RATHOD TAKHUJI SURAJI Member M Y Y 6 60

GOHIL RAJESHBHAI SIVABHAI Member M Y Y 10 40

RAVAL AMRUTBHAI C. Member M Y Y 7 45

RATHOD JEMIBEN PARBATJI Member F Y Y Y 6 43

DABHAI KAILASHBEN T. Member F Y Y Y 8 41

RATHOD SURENDRASINH P. Member M Y Y 12 42

RATHOD RAJUJI FATAJI Member M Y Y 2 48

RATHOD JIGNESHKUMAR N. Member M Y Y TY 21

CHAUDHARI ASHVINKUMAR R. WDT M Y MRM 27



Sr.. No

.

Names of WCs

Date of Registratio

n as a Society

(dd/mm/ yyyy)

NAME Designatio

n M/F

SC

ST

GEN

OBC

SF

MF

LF

Land-less

UG

SHG

GP Any othe

r

Educational qualifi-

cation

AGE

5 ITADR

A

GOSWAMI PARVATIBEN D. President F

Y Y

ITA

DR

A G

RA

M P

AN

CH

AY

AT

PTC 61

PATEL CHHANABHAI H. Secretary M

Y

Y

12 57

CHAUHAN SOHARABBHAI R. Member M

Y

Y

3 41

PATEL DINESHBHAI KANJIBHAI

Member M

Y

Y

10 41

GOSWAMI BACHUGARI K. Member M

Y

Y

7 63

PRAJAPATI SAVATIBEN R. Member F

Y

Y

5 45

PATEL SAROJBEN VIKRAMBHAI

Member F

Y

Y

7 45

VAGHELA VIHAJI PRATAPJI Member M

Y

Y

10 42

RAVAL ARJANBHAI SOMABHAI

Member M

Y

Y

3 60

BALIM SALIMMIYA F. Member M

Y

Y

10 39

PARMAR KISHOBHAI KESABHAI

Member M Y

Y

9 27

CHAUDHARI ASHVINKUMAR R.

WDT M

Y

MRM 27



Table no. 32: SHG detail

Sr. No.

Village Name

Total no. of registered SHGs No. of members No. of SC/ST in each

category No. of BPL in each

category With only Men

With only

Women

With both

Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

1 SAMOU 3 8 0 11

(i) Landless 0 55 55 0 0 0 0 22 22 (ii) SF 33 32 65 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 0 5 0 5 33 87 120 0 0 0 0 22 22

2 AMRAPUR 0 4 0 4

(i) Landless 0 27 27 0 0 0 0 50 50

(ii) SF 0 23 23 0 0 0 0 0 0 (iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 0 7 0 7 0 50 50 0 0 0 0 50 50

3 KUVADRA 0 3 0 3

(i) Landless 0 38 38 0 0 0 0 38 38 (ii) SF 0 16 16 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 0 7 0 7 0 54 54 0 0 0 0 38 47

4 ITADRA 0 6 0 6

(i) Landless 0 115 115 0 21 21 0 103 103 (ii) SF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 0 6 0 6 0 115 115 0 21 21 0 103 103

5 KHARNA 0 5 0 5

(i) Landless 0 48 48 0 4 4 0 30 30 (ii) SF 0 25 25 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 0 5 0 5 0 73 73 0 4 4 0 30 30



Table no. 33: UG detail

Sr. No.

Village Name

Total no. of UGs No. of members No. of SC/ST in each

category No. of BPL in each

category

Men Women Both Total Categories M F Total M F Total M F Total

01 SAMOU 9 0 0 9

(i) Landless 20 0 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 (ii) SF 36 0 36 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 9 0 0 9 56 0 56 0 0 0 0 0 0

2 AMRAPUR 5 0 0 5

(i) Landless 5 0 5 5 0 5 10 0 10

(ii) SF 30 0 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 (iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 5 0 0 5 35 0 35 5 0 5 10 0 10

3 KUVADRA 4 0 0 4

(i) Landless 4 0 4 0 0 0 13 0 13 (ii) SF 24 0 24 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 4 0 0 4 28 0 28 0 0 0 13 0 13

4 ITADRA 5 0 0 5

(i) Landless 8 0 8 5 0 5 7 0 7 (ii) SF 32 0 32 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 5 0 0 5 40 0 40 5 0 5 7 0 7

5 KHARNA 8 0

0 8

(i) Landless 6 0 6 5 0 5 11 0 11 (ii) SF 74 0 74 0 0 0 0 0 0

(iii) MF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (iv) LF 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total 8 0 0 8 82 0 82 5 0 5 11 0 11



Table no.34: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)

Sr. No.

Names of

Villages

Amount earmarked

for EPA Entry Point Activities planned

Estimated cost

Expected outcome

1 Samou 6.64

Drinking Water Supply Pipieline at Kashipura to ChavadaVas

0.84 Drinking

Water Facility

Compound Wall Repairing at Village Primary School 1.00 Better School

Fencing

Pipe Line for Roof rain Water Harvesting Structure 0.10 Drinking

Water Facility

Roof Rain Water Harvesting Structure(High School) 1.45 Drinking

Water Facility

Wire Fencing of Common Fodder Farm 3.25 Protection

from Animal Grazing



2 Amrapur 2.23 Gabion Structure 2.22 Ravine

Reclamation

3 Kuvadra 1.90

Wire Fencing at Compound of Gaucher (Gam-Tal) 1.20 Protection

from Animal Grazing

Afforestation with Wire Fencing 0.70 Afforestation

4 Itadra

4.60

Constructing of Protection Wall 1.12 Protection from Pond Overflow

Drinking Water supply Pipeline 3.48 Drinking

Water Facility

5 Kharna 4.50

Protection Wall ( Village Pond ) 2.21 Protection from Pond Overflow

Wire Fencing in Gauchar 2.29 Protection

from Animal Grazing



34.1 Estimation of Constructing of Protaction wall at village:- Kharana

Name of Work :- Constructing of Protaction wall at village:- Kharana

MEASUREMENT

item No.1 No. L B D Qty Per Excavation for foundation up to 1.5m depth including sorting out and stacking of useful materials and disposing excavated stuff up to 50m lead (b) Dense or hard soil

16 1.2 1.20 23.04

Side wall

2 5 1.0 1.20 12.00

Total 35.04 cmt

Say 35.04 cmt

item No.2 Providing and laying cement concret 1:5:10 (1 cement : 5 fine sand : 10 hand broken stone aggregate 40mm nominal size) and curing complete excluding cost of from work in (a) foundation and plinth.

16 1.2 0.15 2.88

2 5 1.0 0.15 1.50

Total 4.38

Say 4.38 cmt

item No.3

Providing and laying cement concret 1:2:4 (1 cement : 2 coarse sand : 4 graded stone aggregate 20mm nominal size) and caring complete excluding cost of from work in (a) foundation and plinth/wall cape..

up to G.L.

16.0 1.00 1.35 21.60 cmt

16.0 0.73 1.60 18.56 cmt

16.0 0.45 0.10 0.72 cmt

side wall up to G.L.

2 5.0 1.00 0.80 8.00 cmt

2 5.0 0.73 1.40 10.15 cmt



Dedaction

6.0 5.50 0.55 18.15 cmt

Total 40.88 cmt

Say 40.88 cmt

item No.4 Providing Thermo Mechanically Treated bars (TMT bar) reinforcement for R.C.C. work including bending, binding and plasing in position complete up to floor two level

6 NO

Total kg

Say 430.00 kg

item No.5 Providing Formwork of ordinary timber planking so as to give a rough finish including centering shuttering and propping etc. height of propping and shentering below supporting floor to ceiling not Exceeding 4.0mt and removal of the same for in situ reinforced concrete and plain concrete work in (C) Vertical face such as walls thickness )partitions.

16.00 5.05

80.800

2 0.73

2.40 3.480

2 5.00 3.00

30.000

2 0.73

2.40 3.480

Total 117.76 smt

Say 117.76 smt

item No.6

Providing cement plaster 20mm thick in C.M. (1:3) to stone masonary after racking out joints 20mm deep including smooth finising etc complete.

up to G.L.

2 16.0

1.4 44.80 Smt

16.0

0.10 1.60 Smt

2 5.0

1.40 14.00 Smt

Total 60.40 Smt

Say 60.40 Smt



item No.7

Back fillling with Selected earth from out side borrow area or from excavated usefull material including watering, ramming consolidation etc with pneumatic templing and lead upto 1.0 Km. and all lift etc.completed.

up to G.L.

20.0 6.00 0.35 42.00 cmt

Total 42.00 cmt

Say 42.00 cmt

item No.8

Cleaning the slop of dam within the dam boudary by removing the bushes, shrubs, girth and smoll trees including depositin the material as and where directed up to 50mt lead and all lift etc. complete.

50

50 Smt

item No.9 Providing and fixing marble name plate of approved size (03X30X2.5cm) inclu. Engraving letters as directed

1.00 1.000

Total 1.00 no



Figure – 8, Photographs of EPA in Samou project : Write name of Activities in Photographs



4.3.2. Watershed Development Works:

Watershed development works are to be done during second phase of watershed project. A multi-tier ridge to valley

sequence approach should be approached towards implementation of watershed development projects. A net budget of 50

percent is allotted for this work.

Ridge Area Treatment Plans:

It is very important to treat the ridge as this is where the major water resources originate. This involves mainly hilly and

forest region in Vasana watershed. For the ridge area treatment of Vasana watershed following structure are been

Proposed after interaction among Gram Sabha, watershed committee, Range Forest Officer (RFO), Project Manager and

other field staff of project.

1. Check dam

2. Gully plug

3. Stone bunding

4. Farm bunding



1. Check dams

Check Dam is a structure constructed using cement and concrete across the river of comparatively wider water

channel. This structure is preferred where the height of both the banks of river is considerably high and the width of river

channel or stream is less.

Advantages of check dams

The advantages of check dams are that they store surface water for use both during and after the monsoon. They

help in ground water recharge of the area. Recharge of water helps in raising the water table in the area. Availability of

water ensures the increase of agricultural yield by multi-cropping

2. Gully plug

A small gully bund like this one Prevents a new Gully being formed in the middle of the farm, thus preventing erosion

from the beginning itself. Such bunds would make two parts of one field, thus making it difficult to plough, but some

farmers are ready to do it.



3. Stone Bunding

After filling the Staggered Contour Contour Trenches, the excess water flows out in the form of little streams. To stop

these streams, the obstruction walls of the length equal to the width of the streams are made with the help of stones. Such

walls are created at an interval of 200 to 300 meters along the channels of the streams. These walls are known as Stone

bunding

After filling the Staggered Contour Contour Trenches, the excess water flows out in the form of little streams. To stop

these streams, the obstruction walls of the length equal to the width of the streams are made with the help of stones. Such

walls are created at an interval of 200 to 300 meters along the channels of the streams. These walls are known as Stone

bunding.

4. Percolation tank

Percolation Tank is the arrangement in which the retaining walls of clay are made and a dam (waste weir) is

constructed using cement concrete. This tank is preferred at the site where two to three rain water streams meet. The

outlet is also planned so that excess water overflows out of it. The Storage Tank is a good basin for water storage.



Table no.35: Details of activities of preparatory phase (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)

Sr. No.

Name of villages

Initiation of village

level institution

Capacity building

IEC activities

Baseline survey

Hydro-geological

survey

Identifying technical support agencies

Any other (EPA)

Estimated Cost (Rs. in lakh)

1 Samou 0.83 6.64 0.83 0.75 0.75 0.02 6.65 16.61

2 Amrapur 0.28 2.23 0.28 0.25 0.25 0.01 2.24 5.59

3 Kuvadra 0.24 1.91 0.24 0.21 0.21 0.00 1.91 4.77

4 Itadra 0.58 4.61 0.58 0.52 0.52 0.01 4.61 11.52

5 Kharna 0.56 4.50 0.56 0.51 0.51 0.01 4.51 11.27

TOTAL 2.49 19.89 2.49 2.24 2.24 0.05 19.90 49.76 #One of the following may be entered in columns: Completed (ii) in progress (iii) just started (iv) not started



Table no.36: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

Sr. No.

Village name Type of structures

Proposed target

Augmentation/ repair of existing structures

Construction of new structures Total target

No.

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

No.

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

1 Samou

Khet Talavadi 1 1 0.44 1 0.44

Causeway 3 - - 8.40 3 - 8.40

New Pond 11 35.59 11 35.59

Pond Deeping 5 15.59 5 15.59

Protection wall

(Pond) 1 0.65 1 0.65

Total 5 15.59 16 1 - 47.18 21 47.18



Sr. No.


Proposed target



No. Area to be irrigated

(ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

No. Area to be irrigated

(ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

Area to be irrigated

(ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

2 Amrapur

New Pond 3 9.18 3 9.18

Check Dam 3 11.10 3 11.10

Earthen Dam 2 1.82 2 1.82

Stone Masnory With Cement Plastor

3 3.42 3 3.42

Total 8 25.52 11 25.52

Sr. No.


Proposed target



No.

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

No.

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

3

Kuvadra

Pond Deeping 2 6.88 2 6.88

New Pond 2 6.94 2 6.94

Earthen Dam 1 1.80 1 1.80



Total 2 6.88 3 8.74 5 15.62

Sr. No.


Proposed target



No.

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

No.

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

4 Itadra Pond Deeping 2 7.80 4 15.60 23.40

Total 2 7.80 4 15.60 23.40

Sr. No.


Proposed target Augmentation/ repair of existing

structures Construction of new structures Total target

No.

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

No.

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

Area to be

irrigated (ha)

Storage capacity

Estimated cost

5 Kharna Pond Deeping 7 20.64 7 20.64 New Pond 8 28.00 8 28.00

Check dam 1 3.73 1 3.73 Causway 1 3.60 1 3.60

Total 7 20.64 10 35.33 17 55.97



Table no.37: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)

S. No.

Name of Villages Type of structures

Proposed target Augmentation/ repair of existing

recharging structures Construction of new recharging

structures Total target

No. Area to be

irrigated (ha) Estimated

cost No.

Area to be irrigated (ha)

Estimated cost

Area to be irrigated (ha)

Estimated cost

Samou

Recharge Bore

Nil

- - 4 10.40 10.40

Roof Rain Water Havesting Str.

- - 1 0.76 0.76

Total for the village 0 0 5 11.16 11.16

2 Amrapur Nil

Nil

- - - - - - -

- - - - - - -

- - - - - - -

Total for the village 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

3 Kuvadra Nil

Nil

- - - - - - -

- - - - - - -

- - - - - - -


4 Itadra

Recharge Bore

Nil

- - 2 - 4.20 4.20

Roof Rain Water Havesting Str.

- - 14 - 12.60 12.60

Total for the village 14 15.40 15.40

5 Kharna Nil

Nil

- - - - - - -

- - - - - - -


Total for the Project 0 0 25 31.10 31.10



Table no. 38: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas

Sr. No.

Names of Villages

Major activities of the SHGs

Name of activity No. of SHGs involved Average annual income

from activity per SHG

1 Samou

Chilly & Coriander Jeera Processing Unit With Cabin 1

Turmeric Processing Unit With Cabin 1

Disposable Dish & Glass Making 2

Fodder Bank 1

Wheat Grading Machine 2

Rotavater 1

Castor Thresher 1

Wheat, Bajra & Juvar Thrshar 1

Repair Machine ((Juvar Cutting) 1

2 Amrapur


Fodder Bank 1

Disposable Dish & Glass Making 1

Rotavator 1



3 Kuvadra


Fodder Bank 1

Rotavator 1

4 Itadra

Nursery ( Forestry) 1

Nursery ( Vegetable) 1


Floor Mill 1

Rotavator 1


Fodder Bank 2

5 Kharna



Neem Seed Processing Unit 2

Rotavator 1

Fodder Bank 1



Table no. 39: Other activities of watershed works phase – Proposed target

Sr. No.

Name of villages

Ridge area

treatment

Drainage line

treatment

Nursery raising

Land development

Crop demonstrations

Pasture development

Fishery development

Non-conventional

energy


Total Estimated cost (Rs. In lakhs)

(a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b) (a) (b)

1 Samou - - 2 2.68 2 1.20 7 12.20 1 1.50 - - - - - - - - 17.58

2 Amrapur - - - - - - 1 1.20 1 1.50 - - - - - - - - 2.7

3 Kuvadra - - - - - - 30 7.20 2 3.90 - - - - - - - - 11.1

4 Itadra - - - - - - 53 16.98 1 1.50 - - - - - - - - 18.48

5 Kharna - - 2 1.40 - - 8 5.72 1 1.50 - - - - - - 8.62

(a) Quantity in MKS system has to be entered (b) Cost incurred (Rs. in lakhs)



Table no.40: Details of engineering structures in watershed works*

Sr. No.

Village Name

Name of structures

Type of treatment Type of land Executing

agency Target

(i) Ridge area (R)

(ii) Drainage

line (D)

(iii) Land dev.

(L)

(i) Pri-vate

(ii) Community

(iii) Others

(pl. specify)

(i) UG (ii)SHG

(iii) Others (pl. specify)

No. of units (No./ cu.m./ rmt)

Estimated cost (Rs. in lakh)

Expected month & year of

completion (mm/yyyy) M W O T

Farm Banding L C DWDU 1 2.10

1 Samou

Pond Inlet Str. L C DWDU 2 2.45 2012-2016

Farm Outlet L P DWDU 1 0.15 2012-2016

Radi for Soil Conservation L C DWDU 3 3.60 2012-2016

Protection Wall (Pond) L P DWDU 1 0.65 2012-2016

Drainage Line Correction D C DWDU 2 2.68 2012-2016

Recharge Bore D C DWDU 4 10.40 2012-2016

Khet Talavdi P DWDU 1 0.44 2012-2016

Nala Plug C DWDU 1 0.12 2012-2016

Causway C DWDU 3 8.40 2012-2016



Pond Deeping C DWDU 5 15.59 2012-2016

New Pond C DWDU 11 35.59 2012-2016

Roof Rain Water Harvesting Str.

P DWDU 1 0.76 2012-2016

2 Amrapur

Pond Inlet Str. L C DWDU 2 4.56 2012-2016

Earthen Dam L C DWDU 2 1.82 2012-2016

New Pond C DWDU 3 9.18 2012-2016

Check Dam C DWDU 3 11.10 2012-2016

3 Kuvadra

Land Levelling L C DWDU 38 9.12 2012-2016

Earthan Dam L C DWDU 1 1.80 2012-2016

Pond Deeping DWDU 2 6.88 2012-2016

New Pond DWDU 2 6.94 2012-2016

4 Itadara

Recharge Bore D C DWDU 2 4.60 2012-2016

Land Levelling D C DWDU 47 11.28 2012-2016



Radi for Soil Conservation D C DWDU 1 1.00 2012-2016

Pond Deeping D C DWDU 6 23.40 2012-2016

Roof Rain Water Harvesting Str.

14 12.60

Stone Piching Work 2 5.93

5 Kharna

Land Levelling D C DWDU 8 1.92 2012-2016

Causway D C DWDU 1 3.60 2012-2016

Pond Inlet Str. DWDU 5 9.00

Pond Outlet DWDU 3 6.84

Drainage Line Correction D C DWDU 2 1.40 2012-2016

Check Dam D C DWDU 1 3.73 2012-2016

Pond Deeping DWDU 7 20.64

New Pond DWDU 8 28.00

TOTAL DWDU 2012-2016

(M – Materials, W- wages, O- others, T – Total)



Table no.41: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works

S. No.

Name of village

Name of structure/ work

Type of treatment Type of land Executing

agency Target

(i) Ridg

e area (R)

(ii) Drainage

line (D)

(iii) Land

dev. (L)

(i) Private

(ii) Community

(iii) Others

(pl. specify)

(i) UG (ii)SHG

(iii) Others (pl.

specify)

Area (ha)

No. of plants

Estimated cost

(Rs. in lakh)

Expected month & year of completion (mm/ yyyy)

1 Samou

Afforestation ( With Wire Fencing, Site

Clearing & Land Levelling

L C Gauchar 21.66 7.80 2012-2016

2 Amrapura

Afforestation ( With Wire Fencing, Site

Clearing & Land Levelling)

L C

Gauchar 9.41 1.20 2012-2016

3 Kuvadra

Afforestation( With Wire Fencing, Site


L C

Gauchar 3.22 3.90 2012-2016

4 Itadra



L C

Gauchar 3.13 5.70 2012-2016

5 Kharna



L C

Gauchar 9.78 3.80 2012-2016



Table no.42: Details of allied / other activities

S. No.

Name of village Name of activity

Type of land Executing agency Target

(i) Private (ii)

Community

(iii) Others (pl.

specify)

(i) UG (ii)SHG

(iii) Others (pl. specify)

Estimated cost

(Rs. in lakh)

Expected month & year of completion

(mm/yyyy)

1 Samou

Chilly & Coriander Jeera Processing Unit with Cabin

P - - SHG 1.50 2016

Turmeric Processing Unit with Cabin P - - SHG 1.50 2016 Disposable Dish & Glass Making P - - SHG 1.00 2016 Disposable Dish & Glass Making P - - SHG 1.00 2016 Fodder Bank P - - SHG 2.00 2016 Wheat Grading Machine P - - SHG 1.50 2016 Wheat Grading Machine P - - SHG 1.50 2016 Rotator P - - SHG 0.90 2016 Castor Thresher P - - SHG 1.00 2016 Wheat, Bajra & Juvar Thrshar P - - SHG 2.00 2016 Repair Machine (Juvar Cutting) P - - SHG 1.00 2016 Kitchen garden kit P - - B.P.L & LL 0.20 2016 Crop Demonstration plot with Drip Irrigation

P - - SMALL FARMER 1.50 2017

Fertilizer pump set P - - SMALL FARMER 4.00 2017 Green Manure P - - SMALL FARMER 1.50 2017

Animal Health Camp - C - All 1.20

Vaccination Camp - C - All 1.20

Grass Cutter - - - BPL/APL/LL/SF 1.50

Cotton Picker - - - SMALL FARMER 1.80



Wheat Sev Making Machine - - - B.P.L & LL 0.25

Tailoring Machine - - - B.P.L 0.07

Masonry Kit - - - B.P.L & LL

0.20

Electric kit - - - B.P.L & LL

0.32

Plumber kit - - - B.P.L & LL

0.12

Carpenter kit - - - B.P.L & LL

0.10

Vegetable Cart with cooling Facility

- - - B.P.L & LL

1.20

Black Smith kit - - - B.P.L & LL

0.80

Ice dish (Gola)Making Machine with Handcart

- - - B.P.L & LL

0.10

Cycle Repairing kit with Cabin - - - B.P.L & LL

0.20

Camel Cart - - - B.P.L & LL

0.35

2 Amarapur


P - - SHG 1.62 2016

Fodder Bank P - - SHG 1.50 2016 Disposable Dish & Glass Making P - - SHG 1.00 2016 Rotator P - - SHG 0.90 2016 Kitchen garden kit P - - B.P.L & LL 0.08 2016 Crop Demonstration plot with Drip Irrigation


Green Manure P - - SMALL FARMER 0.45 2017





Grass Cutter - - - BPL/APL/LL/SF 0.45


Ice Dish(gola) Making Machine with HandLari

- - - B.P.L & LL 0.11

Vegetable Cart with Cooling Facility

- - - B.P.L & LL 0.40

3 Kuvadra


P - - SHG 1.80 2016

Fodder Bank P - - SHG 1.59 2016 Rotator P - - SHG 0.90 2016 Kitchen garden kit P B.P.L & LL 0.24 Green Manure P - - SMALL FARMER 0.99 2017 Grass Cutter - - - BPL/APL/LL/SF 078 Cotton Picker - - - SMALL FARMER 0.10



Masonry Kit - - - BPL/APL/LL/SF 0.10 Plumber Kit - - - BPL/APL/LL/SF 0.06 Carpenter Kit - - - BPL/APL/LL/SF 0.10

4 Itadra

Nursery ( Forestry ) P - - SHG 0.50 Nursery ( Vegetable) P - - SHG 0.70 Wheat Grading Machine - - - SHG 1.73 Wheat Grading Machine - - - SHG 1.73 Floor Mill - - - SHG 0.90 Rotator P - - SHG 0.90 2016




P - - SHG 1.50 2016

Fodder Bank P - - SHG 1.20 2016 Fodder Bank P - - SHG 1.20 2016 Kitchen garden kit P B.P.L & LL 0.19 Crop Demonstration plot with Drip Irrigation


Fertilizer pump set P - - SMALL FARMER 3.00 2017

Green Manure P - - SMALL FARMER 1.50 2017 Animal Health Camp - C - All 1.20 Vaccination Camp - C - All 1.20 Grass Cutter - - - BPL/APL/LL/SF 1.50 Cotton Picker - - - SMALL FARMER 0.25 Tailoring Machine - - - B.P.L 0.03 Wheat Sev Making Machine - - - B.P.L & LL 0.20 Mesonery Kit - - - B.P.L & LL 0.32 Electric Kit - - - B.P.L & LL 0.12 Plumber Kit - - - B.P.L & LL 0.10 Vegetable Cart With Cooling Facility

0.40

5

Kharna


P - - SHG 1.00 2016

Wheat Grading Machine - - - SHG 1.70

Wheat Grading Machine - - - SHG 1.70

Neem Seed Processing Unit P - - SHG 1.67

Neem Seed Processing Unit P - - SHG 1.67

Rotator P - - SHG 0.90 2016 Fooder Bank P - - SHG 1.50

Kitchen garden kit P B.P.L & LL 0.10

Crop Demonstration plot with Drip Irrigation




Fertilizer pump set P - - SMALL FARMER 1.00 2017

Green Manure P - - SMALL FARMER 0.75 2017 Animal Health Camp - C - All 1.20 Vaccination Camp - C - All 1.20 Grass Cutter - - - BPL/APL/LL/SF 0.75


Tailoring Machine - - - B.P.L 0.07

Wheat Sev Making Machine - - - B.P.L & LL 0.30

Mesonery Kit - - - B.P.L & LL 0.20

Electric Kit - - - B.P.L & LL 0.32

Plumber Kit - - - B.P.L & LL 0.12

Carpenter Kit - - - B.P.L & LL 0.10

Vegetable Cart with Cooling Facility

- - - B.P.L & LL 1.20

Black Smith Kit - - - B.P.L & LL 0.80

Ice Dish(gola) Making Machine with HandLari

- - - B.P.L & LL 0.10

Cycle Repairing kit with Cabin - - - B.P.L & LL

0.20

Camel Cart - - - B.P.L & LL

0.35



Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas

Sr. No.

Name(s) of the villages

CPR particulars

Activity proposed

Target

Target area under the activity (ha)

Estimated expenditure (Rs.)

Expected no. of beneficiaries

1 Samou

Gauchar Land A forestation 21.66 7.80

Whole Village

Village Pond Pond Deeping / New

Pond 53.42

51.18

Village Pond Recharge Bore 5.02 10.40

Gauchar Land Land Levelling 2.2 2.30

2 Amrapur Gauchar Land A forestation 9.41

1.20


Pond 10.26

9.18

3 Kuvadra Gauchar Land A forestation 3.22

3.90


Pond 10.81

13.81

4 Itadra

Gauchar Land A forestation 3.13 5.70


Pond 3.25

23.40

Village Pond Recharge Bore 0.40 4.60

Village Pond Stone Piching 0.40 5.93

5 Kharna Gauchar Land A forestation 9.78

3.80


Pond 37.90

48.64



Capacity Building:-

Capacity Building is the process of assisting the group or individuals to identify and address issues and gain

the insights, knowledge and experience needed to solve problems expeditiously for sustainable livelihood of groups or

individuals substantially. There is a realization in the development sector that there is a need to appraise the success of

development interventions by going beyond the conventional development targets and measures of success (e.g. in the

form of commodities, goods and services) to take into account improvements to human potential. Capacity building of

stakeholders is also increasingly viewed as an important factor in developmental projects that involve participation of

stakeholders at all levels for effective implementation of projects.

Scope of capacity building:-

Income Generation Activities

o Stitching

o Food Processing

o Post Harvest management practices



Fodder development and Management

Afforestation

Gram Vatika

Crop Information

Meteorological Information

Alternative Land Use Plan

Improved and Scientific agriculture practices

Scientific technique of Soil and Moisture conservation

Information Dishemination on Audio/Video

Dairy Development and Management

Rural Craft



Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution:

Sr. No.

Name of the Training Institute

Full Address with contact no., website &

e-mail

Type of Institute#

Area(s) of speciali-zation$

Accredita-tion details

Trainings

Reference Year

No. of trainings assigned

No. of trainees

to be trained

1 Krishi Vigyan

Kendra Randheja, Gandhinagar

Research Institute

Agriculture/ Horticulture/

Animal Husbandry

Govt. 2012-14 2 29

2 Development

Support Centre Ahmedabad NGO Capacity building

Society Registration

Act 2011-14 18 450

3 BISAG Gandhinagar Space

application Remote sensing Govt. 2011-14 2 22

4 Dantiwada Agriculture University,

Dantiwada University Agriculture and

Allied fields Govt. 2012-14 2 120

# Central govt. Dept./ State govt. Dept./ Autonomous Body/ Research Institutes/ Universities/ Others (pl. specify) $ Capacity Building/ Agriculture/ Horticulture/ Animal Husbandry/ Pisciculture/ Remote Sensing/ Water conservation/ Ground water/ Forestry/

livelihoods/ entrepreneurship development/ others (pl. specify)



Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan:

Sr. No. State Project Stakeholders Total no. of

persons No. of persons to be trained

No. of training programmes

Estimated cost

1 Gujarat

PIA 2 2 1 4800

WDTs 6 6 15 124800

UGs 92 92 3 532422

SHGs 460 460 5 1883700

WCs 56 56 6 84000

GPs 5 5 1 10500

Community 10 10 2 3876

Others (Pl. specify) - - - -

TOTAL 621 621 31 2717940



Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities:

S. No. Activity Executing agency Estimated expenditure (Rs.

In Lacs)

Outcome

(may quantify, wherever possible)

1 Video shows DWDU, Gandhinagar 0.8715

Awareness about watershed programmes

2 Pamphlets and posters DWDU, Gandhinagar 0.249

3 Bitshutro DWDU, Gandhinagar 0.6225

4 Banners and hoardings DWDU, Gandhinagar 0.747

TOTAL 2.49 (* Detailed budgeting has to be done at the PIA level)



CHAPTER - 5

BUDGET



Table no. 47: Budget at a glance for the project

Sr. No. Budget component Cost requirement 1 Administrative costs 49.7592 2 Monitoring 4.97592 3 Evaluation 4.97592 4 Entry Point activity 19.90368 5 Institution and Capacity Building 24.8796 6 Detailed Project Report 4.97592 7 Watershed Development Works 278.65152 8 Livelihood activities for asset less 44.78328

9 Production systems and micro-enterprises 49.7592

10 Consolidation phase 14.92776 TOTAL 497.592



Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under IWMP

S. No.

Village

Activity

EPA Institution

and CB DPR

Watershed Development

Work

Livelihood for Asset

less

Production System and

Micro enterprises

Consolidation Total

1 Samou 6.645 8.307 1.661 93.038 14.952 16.614 4.984 146.201 2 Amrapura 2.235 2.794 0.558 31.295 5.029 5.588 1.676 49.175 3 Kuvadra 1.908 2.385 0.477 26.712 4.293 4.77 1.431 41.976 4 Itadra 4.608 5.76 1.152 64.512 10.368 11.52 3.456 101.376 5 Kharna 4.506 5.633 1.126 63.094 10.14 11.126 3.38 99.005

Total 19.902 24.879 4.974 278.651 44.782 49.618 14.927 437.733

Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement

Sr. No.

Village Total cost requirement

Total funds available under IWMP

Gap in funds requirement

1 Samou 106.488 93.038 13.45 2 Amrapura 36.295 31.295 5 3 Kuvadra 50.502 26.712 23.79 4 Itadra 64.512 64.512 0 5 Kharna 63.094 63.094 0

Total 320.891 278.651 42.24



Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes

S. No.

Village Activity to be

carried out

Fund made available to IWMP due to

convergence (Rs. in lakh)

Scheme with which

convergence took place

Reference no. of activity/ task/

structure in DPR

Level at which decision for convergence was

taken

1 Samou - - - - -

2 Amrapura - - - - -

3 Kuvadra - - - - -

4 Itadra - - - - -

5 Kharna - - - - -

Total - - - - -

Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects

S. No.

Name of Private Sector

Partner Agency

Type of agreement signed Financial

contribution

Partnership Interventions

Expected Outcomes

Comments

a)MoU b)Contract c) Any

other (pl. specify)

IWMP Private sector

- - - - - - - -



OUTCOMES

Table no. 52: Employment in Project area:

S. NO.

Names of Villages

Wage employment Self employment

No. of mandays No. of beneficiaries No. of beneficiaries

SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total SC ST Others Women Total

1 Samou 204 0 1368 465 1572 16 0 105 36 121 0 0 120 87 120

2 Amrapura 297 0 1988 676 2285 23 0 153 52 176 0 0 50 50 50

3 Kuvadra 349 0 2333 793 2681 27 0 179 61 206 0 0 54 54 54

4 Itadra 292 0 1955 665 2247 22 0 150 51 173 21 0 94 115 115

5 Kharna 441 0 2950 1003 3391 34 0 227 77 261 4 0 69 73 73

TOTAL 1583 0 10593 3602 12176 122 0 815 277 937 25 0 387 379 412

Table no. 53: Details of seasonal migration from Project area

Sr. No. Names of villages No. of persons migrating No. of days per year of migration

Pre-project Expected post

project Pre-project

Expected post project

1 Samou 105 35

90 - 120 60-90

2 Amrapura 35 12

3 Kuvadra 14 5

4 Itadra 0 0

5 Kharna 28 9



Table no. 54: Details of average ground water table depth in the project areas (in meters)

S. No. Names of Villages Sources Pre-Project level Expected Increase/decrease

(Post- Project)

1 Samou Bore wells

200 to 300 Met 175 to 225 Met

2 Amrapura Bore wells

3 Kuvadra Bore wells

4 Itadra Bore wells

5 Kharna Bore wells

Table no. 55: Status of Drinking water

S. No. Names of Villages

Availability of drinking water

Quality of drinking water Comments

(no. of months in a year)

Pre-project Expected Post project Pre-project Expected Post-project

1 Samou

200 to 300 Met 175 to 225 Met Potable Potable -

2 Amrapura

3 Kuvadra

4 Itadra

5 Kharna



Table no. 56: Details of Kharif crop area and yield in the project areas

Name of village Name of crops

Pre-project Expected Post-project

Area Average Yield (Qtl) per ha.

Area Average Yield per ha (qtl)

(ha) (ha)

Samou

Kharif 666 1998 719.28 2237.76

Rabi 420 1680 483 1948.8

Zaid 200 800 220 896

Village total 1286 4478 1422.3 5082.56

Amrapur Kharif 100 10 108 11.2

Rabi 185 425 212.75 493

Zaid 45 153 49.5 171.36

Village total 330 588 370.25 675.56

Kuvadra Kharif 170 1.7 183.6 1.904

Rabi 90 1330 103.5 1542.8

Zaid 30 360 33 403.2

Village total 290 1691.7 320.1 1947.904

Itadra Kharif 250 2.5 270 2.8

Rabi 220 680 253 788.8

Zaid 330 1188 363 1330.56

Village total 800 1870.5 886 2122.16

Kharna Kharif 185 1.85 199.8 2.072

Rabi 160 800 184 928

Zaid 108 756 118.8 846.72

Village total 453 1557.9 502.6 1776.792



Project total 3159 10186.1 3501.2 11604.976

Table no. 57: Area under horticulture

S. No. Name of Village Existing area under horticulture (ha) Area under horticulture proposed to be covered

through IWMP

1 Samou 3 -

2 Amrapur 5 -

3 Kuvadra 1 -

4 Itadra 2 -

5 Kharna 0.5 -

Table no. 58: Forest/vegetative cover

S. No. Name of Village Existing area under tree cover (ha) Area under tree cover proposed

1 Samou 1 -

2 Amrapur 0.5 -

3 Kuvadra 0 -



4 Itadra 0 -

5 Kharna 1 -

Table no. 59: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in litres, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.)

S. No. Name of Village

Type of Animal

Pre-Project Expected Post-project

Remarks No.

Yield (litres)

Income No. Yield Income

1 Samou Milch-

animals 5500 16250 487.50 6160 19337.5 546

2 Amrapur Milch-

animals 538 1450 43.50 602.56 1725.5 48.72

3 Kuvadra Milch-

animals 900 1900 57.00 1008 2261 63.84

4 Itadra Milch-

animals 1186 5930 177.90 1328.32 7056.7 199.248

5 Kharna Milch-

animals 2401 16457 493.71 2689.12 19583.8 552.955

TOTAL 10525 41987 1259.61 11788 49965 1410.8



Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages S. No. Project Type of Marketing Facility Pre-project (no.) During the project (no.) Post-project (no.)

Backward linkages

Seed certification

Seed supply system

Fertilizer supply system

Pesticide supply system

Credit institutions

Water supply

Extension services

Nurseries

Tools/machinery suppliers

Price Support system

Labour


Forward linkages

Harvesting/threshing machinery

Storage (including cold storage)

Road network

Transport facilities

Markets / Mandis

Agro and other Industries

Milk and other collection centres

Labour


detailed project report (dpr) -...

Documents