designing rpd 321

Upload: al-carloz

Post on 06-Apr-2018

271 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    1/50

    SDS321

    McCrackens Removable Partial Prosthodontics.

    Chapter 10 & 19

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    2/50

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    3/50

    Our objective should be the perpetual preservation of what remains

    rather than the meticulous restoration of what is missing.

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    4/50

    Preserving what remains

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    5/50

    Designing RPD

    On the basis of information gathered from the clinical examination

    and the analysis of the study casts,

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    6/50

    Designing RPD

    the components of an RPD framework are so

    selectedthat the resulting design is estheticallypleasant and is least harmfulto the remaining tissues.

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    7/50

    As a result of the examination and diagnosis, thedesign of an RPD must originate on the diagnostic

    castso that all the mouth preparation are carried outwith a specific design in mind. This could beinfluenced by the following factors,

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    8/50

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    9/50

    Factors influencing the RPD Design

    1. One arch is to be restored or both

    a. Orientation of the occlusal plane.

    b. Space available for restoring missing teeth.

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    10/50

    Factors influencing the RPD Design

    c. Occlusal relationship of the remaining teeth.

    d. Arch integrity and tooth morphology.

    Overlay rest

    Over-denture

    Long rest

    Over-denture

    Vertical space

    Retentive area

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    11/50

    Factors influencing the RPD Design

    2. Remaining abutment support / periodontal health / need for splintingor future additions.

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    12/50

    Factors influencing the RPD Design

    3. Tooth or Tooth & tissue supported prosthesis.

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    13/50

    Factors influencing the RPD Design

    4. Need for abutment modification clasp design.

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    14/50

    Factors influencing the RPD Design

    5. Type of major connector indicated e.g., a torus.6. Materials to be used for framework, bases, & teeth.

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    15/50

    Factors influencing the RPD Design

    7. Patients past experience, i.e., patients inability to accept

    lingual bar or palatal bar major connector.

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    16/50

    Factors influencing the RPD Design

    8. Replacing a single tooth or anterior teeth RPD or FPD.

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    17/50

    Difference between two types of RPDs

    Tooth Supported Tooth & tissue Supported

    class III & IV class I & II

    1. Support Abutment teeth Combination of abutment teeth

    and soft tissues.

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    18/50

    Difference between two types of RPDs

    Tooth Supported Tooth & tissue Supported

    class III & IV class I & II2. Impression Anatomic form Anatomic and functional forms

    (altered cast technique).

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    19/50

    Difference between two types of RPDs

    Tooth Supported Tooth & tissue Supported

    class III & IV class I & II

    3. Indirect No denture rotation Needed to resist any denture base

    Retention hence, not needed lifting away from the tissues.

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    20/50

    Difference between two types of RPDs

    Tooth Supported Tooth & tissue Supported

    class III & IV class I & II

    4. Base type Metal base no future Acrylic base future reline is

    reline is required. anticipated due to bone loss.

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    21/50

    Difference between two types of RPDs

    Tooth Supported Tooth & tissue Supported

    class III & IV class I & II

    5. Clasp design Circlet/Embrasure/Ring Stress release design RPI /

    No stress release RPC, - wrought wire clasp.

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    22/50

    Components of an RPD Framework

    (Review)

    Circumferential Clasps

    Circlet / conventional / C clasp

    Embrasure claspReverse action / Hairpin clasp

    Ring clasp

    Multiple clasp

    Half & half clasp

    Combination clasp

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    23/50

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    24/50

    Components of an RPD Framework

    (Review)

    Infra Bulge or Bar type Clasps

    1. T bar

    2. Y bar

    3. L bar

    4. I bar

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    25/50

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    26/50

    system

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    27/50

    Factors for the Choice of a Direct Retainer

    1. The type of an RPD:

    a. tooth supported:- any type of clasp can be used.

    b. tooth-tissue supported:- stress releasing (I bar) is used.

    2. The location of the undercut on the abutment tooth in relation tothe saddle area (circlet / ring / hairpin).

    3. The periodontal health of abutment (cast / wrought clasp).

    4. The size of an abutment tooth (cast / wrought clasp).

    5. The presence of a tissue undercut combination clasp.

    6. Esthetic considerations I bar clasp in the distal undercut orcirclet clasp in the mesial undercut on anterior abutment.

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    28/50

    Components of an RPD Framework

    (Review)Maxillary Major Connectors

    1. Single Palatal Bar

    2. Single Palatal Strap3. U shaped Palatal Connector

    4. Anterior & Posterior Palatal Straps / Bars

    5. Palatal Plate

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    29/50

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    30/50

    Factors for the Choice of a Maxillary

    Major ConnectorThe rigidity and location in relation to the gingivae and the

    vibrating line posteriorly is critical.

    1. Its design depends on the number and location of the saddleareas and emerges finally after connecting them together, e.g.,modified palatal strap or anterior posterior palatal straps majorconnectors.

    2. Single palatal bar and U shaped connectors are seldom used.

    The later design may be used in the presence of a large palataltorus.

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    31/50

    Components of an RPD Framework(Review)

    Mandibular Major Connectors

    1. Lingual Bar2. Lingual Plate

    2b.Interrupted Lingual Plate

    3. Double Lingual Bar

    4. Labial Bar

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    32/50

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    33/50

    Factors for the Choice of a Mandibular

    Major Connector

    It must be rigid and properly located in relation to thegingivae and movable oral tissues.

    1. Depth of anterior lingual sulcus (8 mm or less).

    2. Periodontal health of the anterior teeth (bar or plate).

    3. Class I edentulous arch may necessitate lingual plate

    for additional resistance to horizontal rotation.

    4. Anterior spacing (interrupted plate or Continuous bar).

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    34/50

    Components of an RPD Framework

    (Review)

    Posterior Rest Seats

    1. Occlusal rest.

    2. Long occlusal rest.

    3. Embrasure rest.

    4. Onlay/overlay rest.

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    35/50

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    36/50

    Components of an RPD Framework

    (Review)

    Anterior rest seats

    1. Cingulum / inverted V rest.2. Ledge rest.

    3. Ball rest.

    4. Incisal rest.

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    37/50

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    38/50

    Selection of a Denture Base

    Types:

    1. Metal base (class III & IV).

    2. Acrylic resin base (class I & II)

    The single important factor in the design of a saddle area andfor the choice of a denture base material is the anticipated need forfuture reline.As class I & II RPDs may require future reline of thesaddle areas (to compensate for the bone loss due to the rotationalmovement occurring under occlusal load), an acrylic resin denture

    base in indicated.

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    39/50

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    40/50

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    41/50

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    42/50

    Step by Step Procedure to Design

    As a start, guiding planes should be marked on the proximalsurfaces of the abutment teeth adjacent to the saddle areas, accordingto the selected path of insertion.

    Step 1: Plan Tooth Support

    For bounded saddles, place the

    prepared rest seats on the occlusal,

    cingulum, or incisal surfaces of the

    abutment teeth, near the edentulous

    areas.

    For distal extension saddleareas,the rest seats are placed on the mesial

    side of the abutment, i.e., away from the saddle areas.

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    43/50

    Step by Step Procedure to Design

    Step 2: Design & Locate the Connectors.The final shape and form of the palatal major connector

    develops after connecting the tooth supported and tooth-tissuesupported units of the arch together.

    The choice of a mandibular major

    connector, however, depends on thedepth of the anterior lingual sulcus.

    The minor connectors will then be

    placed to connect other parts of the

    RPD (rests, retainers, artificial

    teeth, etc..) to the major connector.

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    44/50

    Step by Step Procedure to Design

    Step 3: Plan Retention:Ideally, a direct retainer should be placed on either side of the

    saddle area.Its location on the tooth is dependent on the presence ofa suitable undercut0.01.A bracing or

    reciprocal arm should also be included.

    For a distal extension saddle, an I-bar

    retainer is preferred, as a part of RPI.

    This design should also include an

    indirect retainer to minimize rotation

    of the denture base away from thetissues.

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    45/50

    Step by Step Procedure to Design

    Step 4: Connect retainers to the support units:Supra-bulge clasp is connected to the occlusal rest or the

    guiding plate.Infra bulge clasp is connected to the mesh work minorconnector in the denture base.

    Step 5: Outline and join the saddle areas(denture base)to these selected or

    drawn components of the RPD

    framework.

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    46/50

    Designing Mandibular Framework

    Check List Locate Guide planes POI.

    Plan Support.

    Select the major connector.

    Place the minor connectors forocclusal rests, clasps, artificial

    teeth. Plan retention (direct & Indirect).

    Connect the retainers to theframework components.

    Outline and connect the saddleareas to the major connector.

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    47/50

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    48/50

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    49/50

  • 8/3/2019 Designing RPD 321

    50/50