design of the 1903 wright flyer replica madras institue of technology chennai - 44

37
DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44

Upload: benjamin-griffin

Post on 04-Jan-2016

220 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44

DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER

REPLICA

MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGYCHENNAI - 44

Page 2: DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44

WEIGHT ESTIMATION

Elements Quantity Weight (N) Structure 7.3 Engine 1 5 Propeller 2 1 Landing gear 3 2.25 Servo motors 3 0.58 Radio Controls All 0.212 Fuel 0.3 litres 2.36 Mounting + belt 3 Fuel tank 2 0.6 Misc. 2.5

TOTAL WEIGHT 24.802 N

Page 3: DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44

AERODYNAMIC DESIGN

Page 4: DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44

Lift Calculation

As the t/c ratio of the airfoil is less than 0.05 the classical theory of thin airfoils can be employed, by using this theory all the parameters other than drag is forecasted .

CL Vs Alpha curve for inviscid flow

-1.5

-1

-0.5

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

-15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 25

Alpha

CL

Page 5: DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44

Drag Polar

Induced Drag EstimationAR for a biplane = 4 b/cSpan = 5 feetChord length = 12 inchesAR = 20Gap = 9 inches

CDi = 1/(AR)*(1+)CL2

CDi = 0.11136 CL 2

profile

Profile Drag Calculation CD wet /Cf = 1+ 1.5 (t/c)3/2 +7 (t/c)3

CDp/Cf = 60 (t/c CL/5)4

The drag polar of our model isCD = 0.1303 + 0.1277CL

2

Page 6: DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44

Wing warp

Page 7: DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44

Rolling moment for Both wings = 0.56 (k/c) sin (l+ k cos )2

Where c is the chord of the wing is the angle of warp from the undisturbed

configuration k is the length of wing warp

Page 8: DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44

POWER PLANT SELECTION

Page 9: DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44

Power available

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

velocity

po

we

r

1500

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

1000

5500

6000

Page 10: DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44

specifications

From drag calculations the power required 0.25 bHp

Diameter of the propeller ( 2-blade propeller)10 inches

The diameter is determined from the thrust to be produced.

The ground clearance was also taken into account while determining the diameter of the propeller.

Page 11: DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44

STRUCTURAL DESIGN

Page 12: DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44

WING FRONT SPAR

The bending moment about X axis (Mx) = 14.96 Nm

The formula used, Mxc =(Mx-(My*Ixy/Iyy)) /( 1-Ixy²/ (Ixx*Iyy)) =36.65 Nm

Myc =(My-(Mx*Ixy/Ixx)) / (1-Ixy²/ (Ixx*Iyy)) = -108.04

Nm

The maximum stress on the front spar σz = 32 MPa

The maximum allowable bending stress for spruce wood = 41 MPa

Page 13: DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44

WING REAR SPAR

The maximum stress on the rear spar σz = 40 MPa The maximum allowable bending stress for spruce wood = 41 MPa

Page 14: DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44

ELEVATOR AND RUDDER SPARS

ELEVATOR FRONT SPAR REAR SPAR

RUDDER SPAR

Page 15: DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44

Design of truss members

Though the diameter of the truss members are different, for fabrication simplicity all the members are designed with diameter 5 mm.

Page 16: DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44

PROPELLER SHAFT DESIGN

The formula used to calculate the diameter of the shaft

Me = (M +√(M²+T²)) / 2 = 0.15306 Nm

Te = √(M²+T²) = 0.7938 Nm

Maximum bending strength of the balsa wood σb = 1.18934*10^7 N/m

τ = 2482113 N/m²

Dmoment =7.15 mm

Dtorque =7.95 mm

Therefore the required diameter for the propeller shafts = 8 mm

Page 17: DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44

MATERIALS TO BE USED

S.NO COMPONENT MATERIAL

1 WING SPARS SPRUCE

2 OTHER STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS

BALSA

3 SKIN REYNOLDS PLASTIC

4 FUEL TANK PLASTIC

Page 18: DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44

PERFORMANCE CALCULATION

Page 19: DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44

INTRODUCTION

The performance design covers the five major calculations which are listed below

Steady level flight performance

Climb performance

Range & Endurance

Take – Off & Landing

Turn Performance

Page 20: DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44

LEVEL FLIGHT PERFORMANCE

Cruising Velocity = 4.7 m/sStalling Velocity = 2.35 m/s (CLmax = 2.04)VminD = 2.64 m/sDmin = 2.423 m/sPmin = 6.09 WVminP = 2.06 m/s

Range = 1.616 km (for cruise condition)

Endurance = 5 minutes 54 seconds

Page 21: DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44

CLIMB PERFORMANCE

R/C = Excess Power / WeightExcess Power = Power Available – Power RequiredMaximum rate of climb occurs at 6 m/s

VelocityPower

AvailablePower

RequiredExcess Power

R/C maxAngle of Climb

m/s W W W m/s degree

2 8 6.108897 1.891103 0.075644 2.167557

3 12 7.83886 4.16114 0.166446 3.180502

4 30 13.4841 16.5159 0.660636 9.50645

5 60 22.52976 37.47024 1.49881 17.44327

6 90 36.55183 53.44817 2.137927 20.87438

7 90 60.97091 29.02909 1.161164 9.548366

8 91 90.17925 0.820751 0.03283 0.235128

Page 22: DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44

EXCESS POWER

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

2 4 6 8

VELOCITY m/s

PO

WE

R W

POWERAVAILABLE

POWERREQUIRED

Page 23: DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44

Take – Off

The take-off is curved up into 3 phasesThey are ground run, transition and initial climb upto 2 m and the same is repeated for landingGround run

Vavg = 0.7 VLO (lift off velocity)

= 0.84 Vstall

r = 0.1 for grass landVLO = 2.82 m/sCLLO= 0.8 CLmax

Ground Run = 6.3 mGround Run in transition = 2.1 mGround Run in climb = 4.48 mTotal take off distance = 12.88 m

GroundRun

Transition Climb

Page 24: DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44

Landing & Turning performance

Landing distance total = 17.11 mMinimum turn radius = 0.4 m Corresponding time taken = 1.15 secondsV-n diagram is a plot between the velocity and load factor ( n = L/W)It gives the structural limit (max) of the aircraft and the highest and lowest possible velocity that can be reached by the aircraftThe maximum load factor = 275/25 = 11

Page 25: DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44

V-n DIAGRAM

From the v-n diagram it is clear that n is maximum for the velocity of 8 m/s and the maximum velocity can be 35.75 m/s for the n value less than 11

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35

Velocity

n

stall limit

Structural limit

Max velocity

Page 26: DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44

STABILITY ANALYSIS

Page 27: DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44

LONGITUDINAL STATIC STABILITY

Page 28: DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44

DIRECTIONAL STATIC STABILITY

Page 29: DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44

CROSS COUPLING EFFECT

Increment in Rolling moment due to pitch rate(constant for different pitch rates)

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

(deg)

Incr

emen

tal R

olli

ng

mo

men

t co

-eff

icie

nt

CR

Page 30: DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44

Change in yaw co-efficient for different pitch rates (in rad/s)At cruising velocity of 4 m/s

0

0.0005

0.001

0.0015

0.002

0.0025

0.003

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

Wing warp deflection angle (deg)

In

cre

men

tal

Ya

w c

o-e

ffic

ien

t C

N

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

1.1

1.2

1.3

1.4

1.5

1.5708

Page 31: DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44

COST ESTIMATION

Item Cost 4 channel radio control (with transmitter, receiver, 4- servos, Connectors etc.) 15000 Engine (0.25 bhp) 4000 Balsa Wood 2500 propellers 700 Fabrication cost 1000 Skin, belt, pulley, wires, LG etc. 1500 Total 24 700

Page 32: DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44

RADIO CONTROL COMPONENTS

Engine throttle is controlled by servo motor.Four channel receiver set with 4 servo motors and connectors are used.The R/C unit weighs about 0.75 N.The R/C unit is placed just below the wing so that it reduces the bending moment caused by the lift.

Page 33: DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44

POSITION OF SERVOS

Page 34: DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44

POSITION OF RECEIVER

Page 35: DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44

PROBLEMS

We are amateur designersBut we are confident that we can overcome this problem after taking part in this workshopSince the stability of the aircraft is at a high risk we feel that flying the aircraft safely would require a lot of training

Page 36: DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44
Page 37: DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44