design lab present a ion

8

Click here to load reader

Upload: hari-prasad

Post on 24-Oct-2014

13 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Design Lab Present a Ion

A Amith Reddy (AE09B032) Ch Deepak (AE09b034) S Hari Prasad (AE09B036) Jackson Joseph (AE09b037) Yogesh Jethani (AE09B038)

GROUP 6 :

Page 2: Design Lab Present a Ion

Home

Previous

Next

Help

MISSION AND FIRST WEIGHT ESTIMATE

MISSION Design a strategic bomber conceptually.

PRIMARY DESIGN CRITERIA Important parameters :

Range (8000 Kms – 10000 Kms) Service ceiling (8000 m) Maximum speed (1000 kms)

FIRST WEIGHT ESTIMATE Approach : First weight estimate based on historical data

π‘Šπ‘œ = π‘Šπ‘π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘€ + π‘Šπ‘π‘Žπ‘¦π‘™π‘œπ‘Žπ‘‘

+ π‘Šπ‘“π‘’π‘’π‘™ + π‘Šπ‘’π‘šπ‘π‘‘π‘¦

π‘Šπ‘œ = π‘Šπ‘π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘€ + π‘Šπ‘π‘Žπ‘¦π‘™π‘œπ‘Žπ‘‘ + (π‘Šπ‘“/π‘Šπ‘œ)π‘Šπ‘œ + (π‘Šπ‘’/π‘Šπ‘œ)π‘Šπ‘œ

Page 3: Design Lab Present a Ion

Home

Previous

Next

Help

Graphs plotted from historical data

a) π‘Šπ‘“/π‘Šπ‘œ 𝑣𝑠 π‘Šπ‘œ b) π‘Šπ‘’/π‘Šπ‘œ

𝑣𝑠 π‘Šπ‘œ c) π‘…π‘Žπ‘›π‘”π‘’ 𝑣𝑠 π‘Šπ‘œ d) π‘†π‘’π‘Ÿπ‘£π‘–π‘π‘’ 𝑐𝑒𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑣𝑠 π‘Šπ‘œ e) π‘€π‘Žπ‘₯π‘–π‘šπ‘’π‘š 𝑆𝑝𝑒𝑒𝑑 𝑣𝑠 π‘Š0

Analytical optimization process gives π‘Š0. Using above π‘Š0 and graphs β€˜a’ and β€˜b’ we can get π‘Šπ‘“ and π‘Šπ‘’ . Calculated values :

Page 4: Design Lab Present a Ion

Home

Previous

Next

Help

MISSION PROFILE AND SECOND WEIGHT ESTIMATE

MISSION PROFILE

(30 mins)

Page 5: Design Lab Present a Ion

Home

Previous

Next

Help

Weight loss due to bomb dropping is excluded, because bombs should be carried back if not used.

EMPTY WEIGHT FRACTION β€’ Empty weight fraction can be estimated Using curve fit

equation given below

β€’ 𝑾𝒆

π‘ΎπŸŽ= π‘¨π‘ΎπŸŽ

𝒄 𝑲𝒗𝒔 --------------(1)

β€’ Kvs is variable sweep constant which in this case is 1 as we didn’t opt for any variable sweep.

β€’ For a bomber aircraft ,A and C values are 0.93 and - 0.07 respectively.

Page 6: Design Lab Present a Ion

Home

Previous

Next

Help

FUEL FRACTION ESTIMATION

ENGINE SPECIFICATIONS : Since the aircraft is subsonic high bypass turbofan is selected for its high efficiency in this velocity range.

Specific fuel consumption : Cruise:0.5 Loiter:0.4

TAKEOFF, CLIMB AND LANDING : Weight fractions of Takeoff, climb and landing are independent of the type of aircraft Historical mission segment weight fractions:

Warm up and takeoff 0.970

Climb 0.985

Landing 0.995

Page 7: Design Lab Present a Ion

Home

Previous

Next

Help

CRUISE : The cruise mission segment can be found out from the range equation which is

π‘Šπ‘–

π‘Šπ‘–βˆ’1= exp βˆ’

𝑅𝐢

𝑉(𝐿

𝐷)

LOITER : The loitering weight ratios are found out using the

endurance equation

π‘Šπ‘–

π‘Šπ‘–βˆ’1= exp βˆ’

𝐸𝐢

(𝐿

𝐷)

From historical data wetted aspect ratio is 1.2, with wetted aspect ratio (L/D)max=15.4 and (L/D) = 0.866*(L/D)max . CRUISE SPEED : Cruise speed is found using historical data Plotted graphs from historical data

a. cruise speed vs. range b. cruise speed vs. service ceiling c. cruise speed vs. total take-off weight

with optimization similar to the previous one, cruise speed is found to be about 600 kmph.

Page 8: Design Lab Present a Ion

Home

Previous

Next

Help

SECOND WEIGHT ESTIMATE

Using calculated values for (L/D)max and C, we get π‘Š3

π‘Š2 and

π‘Š4

π‘Š3 .

Taking the aircraft weight at the end as W6, we have

π‘Š6

π‘Š0=

π‘Š6

π‘Š4

π‘Š4

π‘Š3

π‘Š3

π‘Š2

π‘Š2

π‘Š1

π‘Š1

π‘Š0 and

π‘Šπ‘“

π‘Š0= 1.06 βˆ— 1 βˆ’

π‘Š6

π‘Š0 .

Now iteration is performed using the relation π‘Š0 =π‘Šπ‘π‘Ÿπ‘’π‘€+π‘Šπ‘π‘Žπ‘¦π‘™π‘œπ‘Žπ‘‘

1βˆ’ π‘Šπ‘“

π‘Š0 βˆ’

π‘Šπ‘’π‘Š0

and equation π‘Šπ‘’/π‘Š0 = 0.93π‘Š0

βˆ’ 0.07 From the iterative processes

π‘Ύπ’†π’Žπ’‘π’•π’š 37200

𝑾𝒐(second estimate) 88880