design for reliability - quality reliabilty conference 2013

18
Joel Mandel Oct,2013 Design for Reliability : A guide for Civilian Companies (Something you can take home with you at the end of the day)

Upload: joel-mandel

Post on 13-Jun-2015

260 views

Category:

Technology


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Design for Reliability - Quality Reliabilty Conference 2013

Joel Mandel Oct,2013

Design for Reliability :A guide for Civilian Companies

(Something you can take home with you at the end of the day)

Page 2: Design for Reliability - Quality Reliabilty Conference 2013

The ability of a system or component to perform its required functions under stated conditions for a specified period of time(IEEE)

Reliability

Quality

Definitions

A degree of grade or excellence or worth

Page 3: Design for Reliability - Quality Reliabilty Conference 2013

Key to Success

$Reliability

The objective of every reliability engineer is to produce a reliable project plan

The Objective of every company is to make money

The objective of every Reliability Manger is to produce a reliability plan that gives maximum reliability at minimal cost

Page 4: Design for Reliability - Quality Reliabilty Conference 2013

Reliability Engineering

Project Life Cycle

IDEA

R & D Production

Reliability Engineering

Final

Product

Dolly 2

Operation /Useful

Dolly Family

Dolly 1A

Prototype

System ReliabilityAvailability

MTBF

MTTR

FMECATAAF/RGTFTA

Thermal Analysis/Demo

HALTThermalMapping

Qual testingTAAF/RG

High Accelerated Stress testing

ESS-Vibration

ESS- Temperature

Component analysisTemperature analysisLocation analysis

FRACAS

Page 5: Design for Reliability - Quality Reliabilty Conference 2013

Design or Predict

Reliability Prediction MIL STD 217British Telecom HRD4/5Telecordia/Belcore SiemensCnert

Which way to go?

Design for Reliability

Page 6: Design for Reliability - Quality Reliabilty Conference 2013

Problems with Reliability PredictionThe assumptions/models are sometimes wrong. The design can be less than perfect, Production is not flawless Not every failure of every part will cause the equipment to

fail, The database is likely to be at least 15 years out-of-date.

None of this matters much, if the predictions are used to

compare different topologies or approaches rather than to establish an

absolute figure for reliability. This is what predictions were originally designed for.

In otherwords reliability prediction is useless by itself especially for new companies and new concepts .

EUROPEAN POWER SUPPLY MANUFACTURERS ASSOCIATION 2005 ( at www.epsma.org )

Page 7: Design for Reliability - Quality Reliabilty Conference 2013

Comparison of Reliability Models

Page 8: Design for Reliability - Quality Reliabilty Conference 2013

Component Specification ( BOM) / Reliability- Temperature ParetoThe most dominant parameter for component reliability is temperature. Rank components

according to failure rate try to improve failure rate by improving specification ,analyze cost versus

benefit.

Component Placement analysis The component placement should take into accountPower dissipating components should be in a good location for cooling. Surrounding these high dissipating components should be components which can with stand the increase temperature surrounding the high dissipating component

Thermal Mapping Thorough thermal mapping of all components as per prior paragraphs at worst case maximum and safety conditions . This process optimizes cost/temperature through testing many scenarios (for example for fan cooling number of fans location temperature, noise).

Design & Prototype Stage

Page 9: Design for Reliability - Quality Reliabilty Conference 2013

Halt

How far is our theoretical design from real capabilities?

Page 10: Design for Reliability - Quality Reliabilty Conference 2013

HALT Margin Discovery

Stress

UpperDestruct

Limit

LowerDestruct

Limit

UpperOperating

Limit

LowerOperating

LimitProductSpecs

Margin Margin

OperatingOperating

Destruct Margin Destruct Margin

Page 11: Design for Reliability - Quality Reliabilty Conference 2013

Halt

Temp-High Low

Temp Rapid Cycling

Vibration

Combines testing

Power

High Accelerated Life Testing

Page 12: Design for Reliability - Quality Reliabilty Conference 2013

4%4%

6%18%

40%28%

Temperature

Vibration

Humidity

Sand & Dust

Brine

Other

Environmental FailuresRelationship between environmental factors and failure at Hughes Aircraft

Source: ESPEC Technology Report, 1996

Page 13: Design for Reliability - Quality Reliabilty Conference 2013

Four Corner Voltage Temperature Halt Test

Page 14: Design for Reliability - Quality Reliabilty Conference 2013

14

Qualification Testing

Understanding what environmental conditions

product experiences is vital in designing qualification testing.

Page 15: Design for Reliability - Quality Reliabilty Conference 2013

Qualification- Environmental Test Tailoring

Page 16: Design for Reliability - Quality Reliabilty Conference 2013

Transportation

Page 17: Design for Reliability - Quality Reliabilty Conference 2013

Failure Reporting and Corrective Action System

FRACAS

Page 18: Design for Reliability - Quality Reliabilty Conference 2013

Joel Mandel- ConsultantTel: 0547743272ashrey-quality.blogspot.co.il/il.linkedin.com/pub/joel-mandel/14/148/446/www.slideshare.net/CCond007skype:[email protected]

Thank you