department of rural development presentation to ad-hoc task force at 11 am on 21.3.2012 iift, new...

DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENTDEVELOPMENT

Presentation to Ad-hoc Task Force Presentation to Ad-hoc Task Force

at 11 am on 21.3.2012 IIFT, New Delhi.at 11 am on 21.3.2012 IIFT, New Delhi.

1

SECTION 1 Brief description and

background of Department of Rural DevelopmentSECTION 2 RFD of the Department for the

year 2011-12 – experiences and lessons learnt. What worked and

what did not ?

SECTION 3 Overview of the strategy and strategic plan of the department.

SECTION 4 Status of relevant discussions with Planning Commission

(including with Working Groups)

SECTION 5 RFD of the Departmentfor the year 2012-13

OUTLINE OF PRESENTATION

2

SECTION 1

Brief description and background of Department of Rural Development

3

Our Vision

Sustainable and inclusive growth of rural India

Our MissionSustainable and inclusive growth of rural India through a multi-pronged strategy for eradication of poverty by increasing livelihood opportunities, providing social safety net and developing infrastructure for socio-economic growth and improvement of quality of life in rural India

4

Programmes of Rural Development…

…aim at Universal Coverage

…are Demand Driven

…are aimed at increasing sustainability

…have built in Transparency and Accountability

…follow Participatory Approach

…aim at Empowerment of the Poor

5

PROGRAMMES

LIVELIHOODS:• Enhancing and improving livelihood security by providing

minimum 100 days of guaranteed wage employment in every financial year to every household. (MGNREGA)

• Providing livelihood opportunities to BPL households.(SGSY/NRLM)

INFRASTRUCTURE:• All-weather rural connectivity to unconnected rural habitations

and up gradation of existing roads.(PMGSY)• Providing basic housing and homestead to BPL households.

(IAY)• Providing urban amenities in rapidly urbanizing rural areas and

improve the quality of life.(PURA)

SOCIAL SECURITY:• Providing Social assistance to the elderly, widow and disabled

persons.(NSAP)

6

SGSY/NRLM/ DRDA

Div.

MGNREGA Div.

SECRETARY (RURAL DEVELOPMENT) SHRI S. Vijay Kumar

1. RH Div. 2. NSAP Div. 3. OL Div.

1. ADMIN. Div. 2. RFD/Sevottam3. International

Coop. Div.4. PC Div. 5. IEC Div.6. GC/TRG/Parl. Div7. IT Div.

1. RC Div.2. Vig. Div.3. DG, NRRDA

1. MON. Div. 2.NLM 3.V& MC

1. MON./EVALUATION 2. NE Div. 3. P&P Div.

Minister of Rural Development Shri Jairam

Ramesh

Chief Economic

Adviser

Joint Secretary

(RL) (Rural

Livelihoods)

Joint Secretary (SA) (Social

Assistance)

Joint Secretary

(RE-I) (Rural

Employment)

Adviser (Statistics)

Joint Secretary

(RC) & CVO (Rural

Connectivity)

MOS(RD-SA) Shri Sisir

Adhikari

MOS(RD-PJ) Shri Pradeep

Jain

MOS(RD-AS) Ms. Agatha

Sangma

AS & FA

Chief Controller of Accounts

Finance/Budget Divisions of

DRD/DLR & Min. of PR & Min.

of DWS

Joint Secretary (A & C)

(Administration & Coordination)

DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT

MGNREGA/PURA Div.

Joint Secretary

(RE-II) (Rural

Employment)

Economic Adviser

7

RESPONSIBILITY CENTRES

8

Department of Rural Development- Formulates policies and programmes - Releases funds

State Governments- Facilitates implementation- Monitors Programmes

District Administration- Prepares district perspective plans- Implements the programmes

Panchayati Raj Institutions- Plans at the grass root level- Selects works/beneficiaries and implements

Implementation Mechanism

INDIA• 35 States/UTs

• 625 Districts

• 6484 Blocks

• 2.5 lakh Village Panchayats

• 15 lakh Rural Habitations

9

Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, 2005

10

Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act, 2005

An Act to provide for the enhancement

of livelihood security of the households in rural areas of the country by providing at least

100 days of legally guaranteed wage employment in

every financial year to every household

whose adults volunteer to do unskilled manual work

11

Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Act (MGNREGA)

Primary:Supplement employment opportunities in rural areas

Auxiliary: Create sustainable livelihoods through regeneration of natural resource base – land, water, forests (“Green Jobs”)

Process outcomes: Strengthen grass root democratic processes

12

Impact of MGNREGA

Employment provided to Employment provided to 41m Households 41m Households (upto Jan. 12) (upto Jan. 12) Increase in Wage IncomeIncrease in Wage IncomeReduction in Distress MigrationReduction in Distress MigrationEnhanced Food SecurityEnhanced Food Security

Higher Land Productivity Higher Land Productivity Increase in Wage RatesIncrease in Wage RatesEqual Wages for Men and WomenEqual Wages for Men and WomenImprovement in Wage Negotiation PowerImprovement in Wage Negotiation Power

Financial Inclusion, 100Financial Inclusion, 100 million million institutional accountsinstitutional accountsInsurance of Wage EarnersInsurance of Wage Earners Major Safety NetMajor Safety NetAnnual Budget Annual Budget Rs 31000 croresRs 31000 crores

13

Supplementing Employment Opportunities

2009-102010-11 2011-12

(till Jan., 12)

Employment Provided

5.26 crore households

5.49 crore households

4.10 crores households

Persondays Generated

Rs. 283.59 croreRs. 257.15 crore Rs. 140.29

crores

Women 48% Women 49% Women 49%

Persondays per household

54 days 47 days 34 days

Average wage per personday

Rs. 90 Rs. 100 Rs.117

Earning per household per year (average)

Rs. 4860 Rs. 4700 Rs. 3978

Total Expenditure

Rs. 37905.23 cr Rs. 35377.27 cr Rs. 26800 cr.

Works taken up

46.17 lakh 50.99 lakh 66.06 lakh 14

NRLM (Aajeevika)

15

Promoting sustainable livelihoods SGSY now restructured as National Rural Livelihood Mission

(Aajeevika)

16

Enhancing Sustainable LivelihoodsSwaranjayanti Gram Swarozgar Yojana (SGSY) now restructured as National Rural Livelihood Mission

(Aajeevika) Key Features•Social Mobilisation and Institution Building•Financial Inclusion•Livelihoods promotion•Social Development•Convergence

17

•Support to primary level federations•Linkage with departments•Auditing of groups•Anchoring community cadre

•Training to SHGs•Financial and Livelihood Services•Access to public services and entitlements

•Savings•Internal Lending•Accessing Credit from Banks

Secondary Level Federations

Primary level federation - 10-20

SHGs (relaxation in difficult areas)

SHGs one member from each household, preferably a

woman, organized into a

S.H.G. To cover 7crore rural

poor households

Social Mobilization and Institution BuildingInstitutional Architecture

18

• Access to credit is key to come out of poverty

• Out of Rs.100,000 per family required, around 90% has to come from financial institutions.

• Strategic partnerships with banking sector, NABARD and co-operative banks.

• Promoting financial intermediation by mature S.H.G federations

• Interest subsidy on loans to S.H.Gs

• Micro insurance to cover life, health and assets

Financial Inclusion

19

• Coping with vulnerabilities – debt bondage, food insecurity, migration, health shocks

• Strengthening existing livelihoods – agriculture, livestock, forestry and non-timber forest produce

Livelihoods Enhancement

20

Self employment - Entrepreneurship development among local youth to generate in-situ employment. Targeting 60 lakhs micro-entrepreneurs by 2017

Skilled wage employment - opportunities for youth in growing sectors of the economy – targeting 1.0 crore youth by 2017

Livelihoods Enhancement (contd…)

21

Empowerment

22

Outcomes of SGSY/Ajeevika (since inception)(as on Jan., 2012)

Investment on SGSY/Ajeevika : Rs. 44420 crore on both credit and subsidy

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

Assisted Assisted SHGs Formed Beneficiaries Women

Series1

(42.87 Lakhs)(4.29 million)

174.79 lakhs(17.48 million)

(105.91 lakhs(10.59 million)

23

Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY)

24

Rural Connectivity Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana (PMGSY)

Provision of all-weather road connectivity to all the eligible habitations in core network with population of 500 persons or more in plain areas and 250 persons or more for Hill States, Tribal (Schedule-V), Desert Areas (identified in DDP) and 78 selected Tribal and Backward districts under Integrated Action Plan (IAP). Upgradation of selected eligible roads though it is not central to the programme.100% financing by Central Govt.Maintenance by States.Quality assurance mechanism.

25

National Highways2%

State Highwaysand Major District

Roads14%

Rural Roads84%

•Total length of road network in India : 32 Lakh km

•National Highways: 65,600 Km (2%)

•State Highways &

Major District Roads : 4,32,000 Km (14%)

•Rural Roads : 27 Lakh Km (84%)

•80 % of Rural Roads unsurfaced

•3.42 Lakh habitations (39%) out of 8.88 Lakh rural habitations lacked all-weather connectivity in the year 2000.

Status of Road Network in India

26

PMGSY - Current Implementation Status

Activity Total EligibleProjects

SanctionedCompleted upto Jan. 2012

Habitations (in Nos.)

Net 1,58,8491,14,433

(72%)

82,019Eligible (52.%)

Sanctioned (72%)

New Connectivity (km.)

3,65,094 2,55,835(70%)

2,04,285Eligible (56.%)

Sanctioned (80%)

Upgradation(km.)

3,68,0001,63,991

(45%)

1,36,972Eligible (37.22%)Sanctioned (84%)

B- Financial Progress

Value of project cleared

Funds Released

Expenditure

Rs. 1,26,657 Cr. Rs.96,952 Cr. (77%)

Rs.88,931Cr.(92 %)

A. Physical Progress

27

Transforming Rural Lives

Increased access to market, health and education Investment of One Million Rupees enables 165 poor people to move above poverty line

Source : IFPRI, Research Report 110, 1999 28

Indira Awaas Yojana (IAY)

29


Financial assistance is provided to rural BPL houseless households• Unit assistance Revised w.e.f. 1.4.2010- Rs. 45,000 for new construction in plain areas- Rs. 48,500 for new construction in hilly areas and IAP Districts and 78 LWE affected districts.-In addition, Rs. 20,000 available as credit under DRI at interest of 4% per annum.• Allocation to States/Districts -to States on the basis of 75:25 weightage to housing shortage and poverty ratio respectively.-To districts on the basis of 75:25 weightage to housing shortage and rural SC/ST population respectively.

30


• Earmarking of Funds-Sanctions in the name of women or jointly.-60% funds for SC/STs.-15% for minorities.-3% for persons with disability.• Selection of Beneficiary- From Permanent IAY Waitlist based on BPL list of 2002.- There are separate lists for SC/ST & others.- Lists are displayed publicly.

31

National Social Assistance Programmes (NSAP)

32

National Social Assistance Programmes (NSAP)

NSAP at present consists of the following schemes exclusively for Below Poverty Line (BPL) persons/households:

- Pension schemes for Old, Widow and Disabled

-National Family Benefit Scheme (NFBS) for households on the death of the primary breadwinner.

33

Pension Schemes under NSAP

Old age pension under Indira Gandhi National Old Age Pension Scheme (IGNOAPS)

- All BPL persons of 60 years or higher - 196.96 lakh persons have been benefitted so far.

Widow Pension under Indira Gandhi National Widow Pension Scheme (IGNWPS)

- All BPL widows of 40-59 years- 36.11 lakh widows have been benefitted so far

Disability Pension under Indira Gandhi National Disability Pension Scheme(IGNDPS) - All BPL persons with severe/ multiple disability of 18-59

years- 7.70 lakh disabled persons have been benefitted.

Budget to be enhanced from Rs 6158 Cr in 2011-12 toRs 9434.76. Cr (projected requirement) in 2012-13 34

SECTION 2: RFD 2011-12 :- Experience and Lessons learnt, What worked and What

did not ?• Third RFD of the Department.• Total 10 Objectives (including 3 mandatory objectives were taken up with 46

Actions to be attained through 74 Success Indicators. • Overall achievements – 90% + expected

MGNREGA• Experience and Lessons learnt, what worked:- The indicator % of rural households provided employment against demand in the RFD is

the appropriate success indicator of the programme.• What did not work:- Persondays generated and fund utilised were fixed as success indicators. However,

MGNREGA is a demand driven programme and the pesondays generated and fund utilised do not reflect the success of the programme. The programme by providing employment guarantee to the rural households has led to increase in wages in agriculture and other sectors and consequently household incomes. The demand for MGNREGA work is also closely linked to good monsoons and availability of other employment options. Therefore these indicators were not appropriate and have been removed. Other outcome indicators have been added.

35

Contd…

SGSY (NRLM)• What worked? The efforts of the Ministry in providing continuous technical assistance to the

states in setting up of the State missions, and, preparation of their annual action plans.

• What did not work? The proposition that all S.H.Gs to be supported under credit cum subsidy component should pursue common economic activity. This has now been changed to ’promoting diversified livelihoods of individual members’. The group becomes a solidarity unit and not a ‘common production unit’.

• What worked, but was not part of the RFD last year? Large scale proof of concept for sustainable and viable livelihoods of the poor

around key sectors – agriculture. This is being reflected in the RFD of 2012-13. We are also increasing the sectors to include – forest produce, livestock and fisheries

36

Contd...

PMGSY What worked and what did not• “Number of Inspections” as an indicator did not work, since

the objective is to improve quality, therefore a new indicator, “percentage of ongoing/completed roads graded satisfactory” being taken for 2012-13.

• Instead of “length of roads constructed ” a better indicator of “Number of habitations connected” being taken for 2012-13.

37

Contd...

IAYExperiences & Lessons learnt

• States/Implementing Agencies need to be taken on board for the success of Results-Framework Document because actual execution of the programmes is in their hands.

What Worked– The agreed objectives, success indicators and the target to

measure progress clearly indicated in RFD have made it easier to understand how to effectively implement and monitor the scheme.

What did not work– Non-inclusion of Management Information System (MIS) to

monitor the programmes to have comprehensive data input about programme implementation.

38

Contd...

PURA Experience and Lessons learnt, what worked and What not ?

• Since PURA is being tried out on pilot basis, proper assessment of the time needed to complete the processes involved could not be done. This rendered the timelines unrealistic.

NSAP – Experiences & Lessons learnt • Key improvement – better coverage of eligible beneficiaries.

39

Section 3: Overview of the Strategy and Strategic

Plan of the DepartmentMGNREGA• Focusing on labour intensive land development works on community

lands and land belonging to marginalized sections.• Use of ICT to improve delivery of services and enhance transparency and

accountability.

SGSY (NRLM)• Emphasis on setting up of dedicated state missions, staffed with quality

human resources, continuous capacity building of the missions and state developing their own poverty reduction action plans.

• Phasing strategy to ensure capacities are built at all levels and scaling up happens in a seamless organic manner

• Establishing large scale proof of concepts in all critical components, to draw lessons for scaling up – resource blocks, primary sector livelihoods, financial inclusion pilots, self employment pilots, social inclusion pilots, etc. 40

Contd…

41

Contd…

IAY•Ensure adequate and affordable housing for all and facilitate development of sustainable and inclusive habitats in rural areas by expanding Government support, promoting community participation, self-help and public-private partnership within the framework of Panchayati Raj.•Provide access to land, finance, basic amenities and technical support for the construction of the houses.•Creation of web based knowledge network of appropriate technology for specific region/areas of the country for IAY houses with an aim to create a knowledge repository.•Set up Resources Centres at Centre for handling technical, financial & research needs for Rural Housing Habitats and set up similar Centres at States.

42

Contd…

PURA• PPP mode to achieve efficient implementation of Rural

Infrastructure projects and high standards of service delivery.• Convergence of several schemes and simultaneous

implementation in a project mode.

NSAP• To build a database of beneficiaries with Unique ID number• Open accounts in Banks for all beneficiaries as far as possible.• Disbursement of benefits under NSAP through transaction

based NSAP-MIS.

43

Section 4Discussion with Planning Commission

(including Working Groups) MGNREGA-The working group has recommended strengthening the institutional arrangement at all levels for better implementation of MGNREGA. This includes cluster level teams in high expenditure Blocks. The working group has also accorded priority to capacity building efforts. These recommendations will help in achieving the RFD indicators in 2012-13. -Use of modern technology including ICT for timely disbursement of benefits.

44

SGSY (NRLM)• Emphasis on capacity building of State, district and Sub—district

Mission units. • Placement linked skill development to be a major initiative in 12th

Plan • Sustainable livelihoods initiatives in agriculture, forest produce (non-

timber), livestock, fisheries, etc. • Financial inclusion to be major thrust area for savings and credit• Special initiatives for social inclusion of weaker sections and

vulnerable categories.

45

Contd…

Contd…

PMGSY:• Working Group has recommended striking of balance between maintenance and

creation of assets.• Working Group has recommended more emphasis on providing connectivity to IAP

Districts.• Working Group has recommended intensification of efforts to use marginal/local

materials in road construction.IAY (Rural Housing):• Working Group has recommended enhancement in unit assistance for the construction

of houses . • Provision for capacity building and man-power strengthening to make MIS successful

recommended.• New ways to implement new financial instruments/bankable schemes to be

investigated.• Provision of technical training and technical support to the ground level officials

and beneficiaries respectively.

46

Contd…

PURA The working group has recommended a larger role for the State

Governments in the appraisal and approval of PURA projects and also conversion of the scheme into a centrally sponsored scheme. This will enhance the commitment of the States to the scheme.

The working group has also recommended establishment of adequate institutional arrangement for project implementation. These recommendations will help in achieving the RFD indicators in 2012-13.

NSAP• No working group

47

RFD 2012-13

Inter se priorities among key objectives, success indicators and targets

Table 1- Result-Framework Document (RFD) Table 2- Trend Value for Success Indicators

48

Section 2 Table 1 – Result Framework Document

Objective Weight Actions Success Indicators

Weight Target Value (100%)

Objective 1 15 1.1 % of households provided employment against demanded employment under MGNREGS

% of rural households

2.00 98

1.2 Person days generated under MGNREGS (women)

% of persondays (women) generated

2.00 33

49

Contd…



Objective 1 15 1.3 Approval of State Labour Budget for 2012-13

Approval of Labour budget of States

2.00 28

1.4 Review by Central Employment Guarantee Council

No. of meetings held

2.00 2

1.5 Regional Review meetings in 6 Regions.

No. of meetings 1.00 12

1.6 Monitoring of MGNREGA process and quality of works

No. of district for NLM visit

1.00 100

50

Contd…



Objective 1 15 1.7 MIS reporting of expenditure

% of expenditure reported on MIS

2.00 90

1.8 Capacity building for enhancing effectiveness of Gram Sabha

No. of Gram Panchayat for training

1.00 100

1.9 Pilot e-FMS solution in States

Number of States initiated e-FMS

1.00 6

1.10 Pilot social audit in States

Number of States piloted social audit.

1.00 20

51

Contd…

Objective Weight Actions Success Indicators Weight Target Value (100%)

Objective 2 15 2.1 State Missions for NRLM Implementation

Number of new State missions set up

1.00 7

2.2 District Programme Management Unit set up for NRLM Implementation

No. of new District Programme Management Unit Set up

1.00 58

2.3 Block Programme Management Unit set up for NRLM implementation

No. of new Block Programme Management Unit Set up

1.00 144

2.4 Formation of Self Help Groups (SHGs)

No. of SHGs formed (in lakhs)

2.00 2.88

52

Contd…



Objective 2 15 2.5 Capacity Building and Training of beneficiaries

Number beneficiaries provided training (in lakhs)

2.00 5.47

2.6 Provision of economic support (credit and Subsidy) to SHGs for livelihood promotion

Number of SHGs assisted (in lakhs)

2.00 1.74

2.7 Promoting Sustainable Livelihoods- large sized proof of concepts

No of key livelihood sectors where proof of concepts has been established

1.00 2

53

Contd…



Objective 2 15 2.8 Sustainable livelihoods Pilots - families benefited

No of beneficiaries intervened by livelihood interventions (in lakhs)

2.00 9.60

2.9 Sanction of Placement linked skill development projects through private sector participation

Number of beneficiaries trained and placed (in lakhs)

2.00 3.84

2.10 Number of micro enterprises created through RSETI and partnership organisations

Number of beneficiaries trained (in lakhs)

1.00 0.96

54

Contd…



Objective 3 15 3.1 Habitations – Habitations to be connected

Connection of habitations

4.00 4,000

3.2 Satisfactory Quality of roads under construction.

% of “satisfactory grading”

2.00 70

3.3 Satisfactory Quality of roads completed.


2.00 75

3.4 Data Entry on OMMAS reg. road length sanctioned.

% of data entry on OMMAS

1.00 90

55

Contd…


Objective 3 15 3.5 Data Entry on OMMAS reg. value of projects sanctioned


1.00 90

3.6 Data Entry on OMMAS reg. habitations sanctioned


1.00 90

3.7 Maintenance Funds credited

Funds credited (%) 1.00 80

3.8 Maintenance Funds expenditure

Expenditure (% of deposit)

1.00 60

3.9 Regional Review Meetings

No. of review meetings

1.00 12

3.10 Improving the capacity of NRRDA

Implementation of McKinsey Report

1.00 9

56

Contd…



Objective 4 15 4.1 Develop MIS architecture

Active convergence with States

3.00 18

4.2 Fulfilment of physical target for the year

Construction of houses

6.00 17.30

4.3 Focus on weaker sections

No. of houses (in lakhs)

3.00 10.38

4.4 Monitoring of performance of States

Effective Monitoring by way of monthly meetings of coordinating offices, quarterly meetings of Secretaries and annual meetings of PDs, DRDAs etc.

3.00 10

57

Contd…



Objective 5 10 5.1 Scrutiny of proposals for release of funds

Release of funds to the States (in lakhs)

2.00 9434.76

5.2 Identification of eligible beneficiaries for Pension Schemes for the aged, widows and the disabled

Coverage of beneficiaries vis-à-vis the estimated number (in lakhs)

3.00 315

5.3 Identification of eligible households for assistance under NFBS.

Coverage of eligible households vis-à-vis the estimated numbers (in lakhs)

3.00 3.43

58

Contd….



Objective 5 10 5.4 Placing the database of pensioners in the public domain under MIS

Uploading of pensisoners database vis-à-vis the physical coverage (in lakhs)

2.00 170

Objective 6 5 6.1 Rolling out of remaining 7 pilot projects of PURA

Approval of DPRs and release of funds to DRDAs

0.5 31.10.12

6.2 Execution of State support agreement and concession agreement

Signing of Agreements

0.5 30.11.12

59

Contd…


Objective 6 5 6.3 Commencement of activities

Inventorisation of assets, procurement of land, release of grant instalment, financial closure and dissemination of project documents

0.5 31.12.12

6.4 Selected private developers to provide urban amenities in PURA clusters, drinking water and sewage treatment, construction of village streets, drainage, solid waste management, skill development of rural BPL youths etc.

Approval of DPRs and release of funds to DRDAs

0.5 31.10.12

60

Contd…



Objective 6 5 6.5 Revision of PURA guidelines based on learning so far in the pilot phase

Incorporating modifications in consultations with connected Ministries for effective implementation

0.5 31.12.15

6.6 Calling for Expression of Interest (EOI) for the next set of pilot projects

After revising the guidelines, finalization and advertising of EOI document.

0.5 31.10.12

6.7 Evaluation of EOIs and short listing to select capable Private developers

Scrutiny of EOIs received and shortlisting

1.00 30.9.12

61

Contd…



Objective 6 5 6.8 Calling for Request for proposals (RFP) from short listed private developers

Finalization of RFP document and its publication in newspapers

1.00 30.11.12

Objective 7 5 7.1 Improving service delivery of NIRD

Implementation of recommendation of Committee

2.00 30.11.12

7.2 Organisation of Training Courses

Number of Trainings conducted

2.00 23,000

7.3 Organisation of five national Colloquia of SIRDs and ETCs

April, 12, June, 12, August 12, Nov., 12 and Jan., 13

1.00 5

62

Contd…



Objective 8 5 8.1 Finalization / Preparation of final reform proposal

Preparation of Detailed target oriented action plan for implementation

3.00 April, 12

8.2 Implementation of Action Plan

Engaging Implementation agent

2.00 June, 12

63

Section 3 Table 2 – Trend value for Success Indicators

Objective Weight Actions Unit Actual Value for FY 10-11

Actual Value for FY 11-12 (prov.)

Target value for 12-13

Objective 1 15 1.1 % of households provided employment against demanded employment under MGNREGS

% 99 99 99

1.2 Person days generated under MGNREGS (women)

% 48 49 33

64

Contd…




Objective 1 15 1.3 Approval of State Labour Budget for 2012-13

Nos. 28 28 28

1.4 Review by Central Employment Guarantee Council

Nos. 3 2 3

1.5 Regional Review meetings in 6 Regions.

Nos. 2 1 12

65

Contd…




Objective 1 15 1.6 Monitoring of MGNREGA process and quality of works

Nos. - - 100

1.7 MIS reporting of expenditure

% - 85 90

1.8 Capacity building for enhancing effectriveness of Gram Sabha

Nos. of GP

- - 100

66

Contd…




Objective 1 15 1.9 Pilot e-FMS solution in States

Nos. - - 6

1.10 Pilot social audit in States

Nos. - - 5

Objective 2 15 2.1 State Missions for NRLM Implementation

Number of new State missions set up

- 20 8

67

Contd…




Objective 2 15 2.2 District Programme Management Unit set up for NRLM Implementation

No. of new District Programme Management Unit Set up

- - 60

2.3 Block Programme Management Unit set up for NRLM implementation

No. of new Block Programme Management Unit Set up

- - 150

2.4 Formation of Self Help Groups (SHGs)

No. of SHGs formed (in lakhs)

2.85 3.00 3.00

68

Contd…




Objective 2 15 2.5 Capacity Building and Training of beneficiaries

Number beneficiaries provided training (in lakhs)

27.45 19.00 5.70

2.6 Provision of economic support (credit and Subsidy) to SHGs for livelihood promotion

Number of SHGs assisted (in lakhs)

3.86 2.00 1.78

2.7 Promoting Sustainable Livelihoods- large sized proof of concepts

No of key livelihood sectors where proof of concepts has been established

- - 3.00

69

Contd…




Objective 2 15 2.8 Sustainable livelihoods Pilots - families benefited

No of beneficiaries intervened by livelihood interventions (in lakhs)

- - 10.00

2.9 Sanction of Placement linked skill development projects through private sector participation

Number of beneficiaries trained and placed (in lakhs)

0.85 3.75 4.00

2.10 Number of micro enterprises created through RSETI and partnership organisations

Number of beneficiaries trained (in lakhs)

- - 1.00

70

Contd…




Objective 3 15 3.1 Habitations – Habitations to be connected

Nos 7584 4000 4000

3.2 Satisfactory Quality of roads under construction.


- - 70

3.3 Satisfactory Quality of roads completed.


- - 75

71

Contd…




Objective 3 15 3.4 Data Entry on OMMAS reg. road length sanctioned.


70 80 80

3.5 Data Entry on OMMAS reg. value of projects sanctioned


- 60 80

72

Contd….




Objective 3 15 3.6 Data Entry on OMMAS reg. habitations sanctioned


- - 80

3.7 Maintenance Funds credited

Funds credited (%)

- - 70

3.8 Maintenance Funds expenditure

Expenditure (% of deposit)

- - 50

73

Contd…




Objective 3 15 3.9 Regional Review Meetings

No. of review meetings

- - 12

3.10 Improving the capacity of NRRDA

Implementation of McKinsey Report

- - 9

74

Contd…




Objective 4 15 4.1 Develop MIS architecture

No. of States

- - 18

4.2 Fulfilment of physical target for the year

Nos. of houses (In lakhs)

29.09 27.26 17.30

4.3 Focus on weaker sections

-do- 17.45 16.87 10.38

4.4 Monitoring of performance of States

No. of meetings

10 10 10

75

Contd…




Objective 5 10 5.1 Scrutiny of proposals for release of funds

Rs. in crores

5110 6658 9434.76

5.2 Identification of eligible beneficiaries for Pension Schemes for the aged, widows and the disabled

No. in lakhs

215 226 315

76

Contd…




Objective 5 10 5.3 Identification of eligible households for assistance under NFBS.

No. in lakhs

2.05 3.43 3.43

5.4 Placing the database of pensioners in the public domain under MIS.

No. in lakhs

164 170 170

77

Contd…




Objective 6 5 6.1 Rolling out of remaining 7 pilot projects of PURA

Time period

- - 31.10.12

6.2 Execution of State support agreement and concession agreement

- - 30.11.12

78

Contd…




Objective 6 5 6.3 Commencement of activities

Time period

- - 31.12.12

6.4 Selected private developers to provide urban amenities in PURA clusters, drinking water and sewage treatment, construction of village streets, drainage, solid waste management, skill development of rural BPL youths etc.

- - -

79

Contd…




Objective 6 6 6.5 Revision of PURA guidelines based on learning so far in the pilot phase

Time period

- - 31.5.12

6.6 Calling for Expression of Interest (EOI) for the next set of pilot projects

- - 31.7.12

80

Contd…




Objective 6 6.7 Evaluation of EOIs and short listing to select capable Private developers

Time period

- - 30.9.12

6.8 Calling for Request for proposals (RFP) from short listed private developers

- - 30.11.12

81

Contd…




Objective 7 5 7.1 Improving service delivery of NIRD

Time period

- - 30.11.12

7.2 Organisation of Training Courses

Nos. 41030 13144 23000

7.3 Organisation of five national Colloquia of SIRDs and ETCs

Nos. 2 5 5

82

Contd….




Objective 8 5 8.1 Finalization / Preparation of final reform proposal

Time period

- - April, 12

8.2 Implementation of Action Plan

Nos. June, 2012

83

Description of Success indicators and measurement methodology

Schemes of DoRD are Centrally Sponsored Schemes that are implemented through:-

(i) State Governments (ii) Autonomous societies under State Governments(iii) District Rural Development Agencies (DRDAs).

Role of Union Government (DoRD):(i) Issue guidelines of schemes/ programmes.(ii) Provide financial assistance.(iii) Periodically monitor progress of the secheme.(iv)Evaluate the impact of the schemes.

The various success indicators have been prescribed accordingly.

84


MGNREGAI. Wage income provided per household.II. Coverage of marginalized groups

• Percentage of SC participation.• Percentage of ST participation• Percentage of women participation.

SGSY: 1. No. of new District Programme Management Unit Set up

2. No. of new Block Programme Management Unit Set up3. No. of SHGs formed4. No. of beneficiaries provided training 5. No. of SHGs assisted6. No of key livelihood sectors where proof of concepts has been

established7. No of beneficiaries intervened by livelihood interventions8. Number of beneficiaries trained and placed9. Number of beneficiaries trained and placed

10. No. of beneficiaries trained85


PMGSY(i) Financial support provided to State Governments to

construct rural roads.(ii) State Governments responsible to execute projects(iii) Projects of State Governments sanctioned by Ministry after examining their DPRs. (iv) Progress periodically reviewed through reports review meetings, field visits etc.(v) Success indicators are:-(a) Length of new roads(b) Amount of fund released.(c) Inspections done by National/State Quality Monitors.

86



I. This Centrally Sponsored Scheme is implemented :(i) By DRDAs at District Level(ii) By PRIs at Gram Panchayat level.II. Central Government releases funds and monitor

progressIII. Release of funds dependent on submission of complete proposals by DRDAs for 2nd Installment.IV. Success indicators are:-(i) Amount of funds released.(ii) Number of Houses sanctioned and constructed

87


PURA

(i) Success indicators for 2012-13:-

Achievement of performance standards incorporated in the Concession Agreement – as certified by the

Independent Engineer.

National Social Assistance Programme (NSAP)

I. All Schemes of NSAP are for poverty alleviation.II. Funds to be released and number of beneficiaries

generally specified.III. Process of identification of eligible beneficiaries under IGNWPS and IGNDPS underway.IV. Monitoring done through review meetings indicated

under various schemes.

88

Specific performance requirement from other Departments

1. State Government/UTs must submit complete proposals well in time. 2. Support of M/o Finance and Planning Commission

required for budget outlays.MGNREGA:-

(i) Demands of PRIs to be projected timely. (ii) Mechanism of convergence of various programmes

should be positively exploited.SGSY/NRLM

• State Government/UTs must submit complete proposals well in time.

• Support of M/o Finance and Planning Commission required for budget outlays.

• Support of Public Sector Banks required under SGSY/NRLM for provision of credit for SHG members and federations.

89

Specific performance requirement from other Departments

PMGSY:-(i) State agencies must implement programmes meticulously.(ii) Timely provision of budgets and mobilization of assistance

from external agencies to be done meticulously. IAY :-

(i) State/ UTs must submit timely proposal for release of funds.(ii) They must timely release funds to beneficiaries and assist

them logistically. (iii) Agencies to monitor constructions of houses in stipulated

time.(iv) Public Sector Banks to provide loan to beneficiaries under

Differential Rate of Interest (DRI) Scheme with minimal required documentation.

PURA:-(i) Signing of State support Agreement for PURA(ii) Sponsoring the PURA proposals for Public-Private Partnership

with private parties; signing of Concession Agreement for PURA.

90

Outcome/Impact of the Ministry/DepartmentSection 6 : Outcome/Impact of Department/Ministry

Outcome /Impact of Department /Ministry

Jointly responsible for influencing this outcome/impact with the following organization(s)/departments/ministries

Success Indicator Unit 2010-2011

2011-2012

2012-2013

2013-2014

2014-2015

Enhance livelihood security of households in rural areas

State Governments, Ministry of Finance, Planning Commission

1.1 Credit mobilised for women SHGs1.2 Total Wage Expenditure1.3 Wage Income per household

Rs. In crore

-do-

Rs.

12622

25579

4865

-

25686

4675

-

16368

3996

-

-

-

-

-

-Improved all-weather rural road connectivity

-do- 2.1 Length of rural roads constructed in Kms.

Number 45,109 29,700 24,400 27,000 32,000

2.2 Length of rural roads upgraded in Kms.

Enhanced basic housing to BPL households in rural areas

-do- Increase in coverage of rural households

% 93.36 47.25 90 90 90

Improved social assistance to the elderly, widow and disabled persons

-do- Increase in beneficiaries

% 105% (215)

100% (226)

100%(315)

100% (315)

100% (315)

91

department of rural development presentation to ad-hoc task force at 11 am on 21.3.2012 iift, new...

Documents

rural areasauxiliary

rural developmentsection

lakh rural habitations

unconnected rural habitations

urbanizing rural areas

allweather rural connectivity

background of department

wage ratesequal wage