department of related services
DESCRIPTION
Department of Related Services. OPENING MEETING 2014-2015. DSD Related Services Department Point of Contact. Adapted PE – Bradie Ormond Audiology – Jocelyn Taylor Hearing Specialists – Bradie Ormond Interpreting Services – Cheryl Orme Speech Language Pathologists – Cheryl Orme - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Department of
Related ServicesOPENING MEETING 2014-2015
DSD Related Services Department Point of Contact
• Adapted PE – Bradie Ormond• Audiology – Jocelyn Taylor• Hearing Specialists – Bradie Ormond• Interpreting Services – Cheryl Orme• Speech Language Pathologists – Cheryl Orme• Occupational Therapists and COTA – Jocelyn Taylor• Physical Therapists – Cheryl Orme• Psychologists – Bradie Ormond • Vision Specialists – Jocelyn Taylor
District and Department Goals
Davis School District: Learning FirstDepartment of Special Education:• Graduation Rates• Student Proficiency
Department of Related Services• Student Learning Outcomes (measures of proficiency for groups) • Standards-Based IEP and Service Delivery (condition portion of the IEP)
What Process Did We Use? 4DX | From X to Y by ___
4
Principles of 4DX
• Focus• Leverage• Engagement• Accountability
KEEPA
KEEP A COMPELLINGSCOREBOARD
FOCUS ON WIGS
ACT ON LEAD
MEASURES
CADENCE OF ACCOUNTABILITY
5
DSD SPED Wildly Important Goals (WIGS)
6
LAG VERSUS LEAD MEASURES
LAG• By the time you get the data, the result
has already happened: they are always lagging.
• Formula: From X to Y by when.• The whirlwind is full of lag measures.
• MEASURES THE GOAL
LEAD• Foretell the result• Teams can make a lead measure
happen without a significant dependence on another team.
• PREDICTIVE• INFLUENCEABLE
7
STND 5
Ascending
A 70
71.6
73.3
79.9
79.9
80
81.6
C 85
Y 85
85
88.3
88.3
89.9
90
Median 91.6
92.4
93.3
93.3
95
95
95.8
96.6
98.3
98.3
98.3
98.3
100
100
100
Total 2594
N 29
Mean 89.4
Mode 98.3
Median 91.6
WCA1 WCA2 Test
Ascending Ascending Asending
0 0 Y 64
0 Y 40 68
C 40 C 70 72
Y 50 70 80
50 70 C 84
70 70 84
80 80 84
80 80 84
80 80 84
80 80 88
A 90 80 88
90 80 88
90 80 88
90 80 A 92Median 90 A 90
Median 92
90 90 92
90 90 92
90 90 92
90 90 96
90 90 96
90 100 96
100 100 96
100 100 96
100 100 96
100 100 96
100 100 100
` 100 100 100
100 100 100
100 100 100
Total232
0 Total240
0 Total258
8
N 29 N 29 N 29
Mean 80.0 Mean 82.8 Mean 89.2
Mode 90Mode 100 Mode 96
Median 90
Median 90
Median 92
Autopsy Whole Class Data DisplayStandard 5
Student AStudent CStudent Y
• Homework
• Weekly Common Assessment 1-2
(formative)
• Test (summative)
8
Concept Analysis and Homework / Assessment Comparison
*SWD Lesson 6 (odds) Homework Lesson 7 Homework *WCA 2Fractional Parts Lines,
Segments, and Rays
Linear Measure
Summary
A 80% 60% 90%C 86.6% 83.3% 70%Y 80% 90.4% 40%
mean 88.6% 90.4% 82.8%median 93.3% 93.3% 90%mode 100% 96.6% 100%
Green font= at or above measure of central tendency (MCT)Red font = below MCT
*WCA=Weekly Common Assessment
*SWD=Student with a Disability
Autopsy
9
Tracking Lead Measure Data
LAG MEASURE• Measures the goal• Measures a result
LEAD MEASURE• Predictive – measures something that
leads to the goal.• Influenceable – something we can
influence
Inference Questions Teach students to find more evidence.
DSD Overall Graduation Rate 2013 All Students 87.57%, Students with Disabilities 57.31%
• Bountiful HS 64%• Clearfield HS 70%• Davis HS 67%• Layton HS 55%• Mountain HS 50%
• Northridge HS 55.32%• Syracuse HS 64%• Viewmont HS 56%• Woods Cross HS 35%
Math Proficiencyof Students with Disabilities in
DSDGrade
3-810
Percent Proficient
37%14%
Elementary ELA Proficiency – CRTStudents with Disabilities
Grade Concept with lowest reported student proficiency1 Reading Informational Text 55.56%2 Reading Literature 75%3 Learn new words by relating them to known words and/or
concepts 62.11%4 Revise by elaborating and clarifying a written draft 70.92%5 Prepare to write by gathering / organizing information / ideas
(pre-writing) 68.57%6 Revise by elaborating and clarifying a written draft 56.80%
Elementary Math Proficiency – CRT – SWDGrade Concept with lowest reported student proficiency1 Measurement and data 80.00%2 Geometry 75.00%3 Recognize perimeter and distinguish between linear & area
measure 64.91%4 Measurement and data 72.12%5 Use equivalent fractions as a strategy to add and subtract
fractions 57.14%6 Solve real-world/mathematical problems involving area,
surface area/volume 36.27%Geometry 36.27%
Secondary ELA Proficiency – CRT – SWDGrade Concept with lowest reported student proficiency7 Seek & give information using the process of inquiry 53.03%
Use of inquiry to formulate questions & engage in gathering information 53.03%
8 Use process of inquiry to focus thinking to understanding an idea/concept 51.28%
9 Recognize perimeter and distinguish between linear & area measure 64.91%
10 Revise/edit ideas, organization, voice, word choice, sentences, fluency/convention 49.36%Write information and literary text 49.36%
11 Use the process of inquiry to draw conclusions 50.38%
Secondary Math Proficiency – CRT – SWDGrade Concept with lowest reported student proficiency7 Apply the properties of proportionality to different units of
measurements 45.38%8 Use algebraic, spatial/logical reasoning to solve geom/measurement
problems 40.92%9 Represent & compute fluently with complex numbers 75.00%
Use percentiles & measures of variability to analyze data 75.00%10 Simplify polynomials and the quotient of monomials 24.42%11 Factor Polynomials w/common monomial & factor simple quadratic
expressions 40.00%12 Describe spatial relationships using coordinate geometry 50.00%
Law Conference Update
• IDEA – 10 years in without major revisions• Dynamic Learning Maps (DLM) & Essential Elements (EE)• Evaluation … do not delay for RTI• Medical Information and diagnoses • RTI and MTSS• Placement versus location• E-mail cautions
Medical Diagnosis and 504/IDEA Eligibility
• When you receive a medical history during an evaluation:1. Don’t reject a medical diagnoses, unless there is contrary medical data 2. “Whether the student is IDEA-eligible requires more than a diagnosis or
medical opinion.” Look at evaluation and eligibility criterion, gather data through formal and informal assessments and determine eligibility as an IEP team.
• Document, document, document!• Receipt of reports form outside agencies• Team consideration of the reports• Items adopted by the team and rationale for rejected items
Administrators Boot CampThe Basics of Special Education
• Top Four Acronyms: IDEA, IEP, FAPE, LRE• Eligibility for Special Education Services (3 prongs): The team determines
1. If the child is “a child with a disability”2. If the disability affects academic and functional performance3. If the child is in need of special education and related services
• Eligibility for Related Services (2 sub-prongs)1. The student must be eligible to receive special education services2. The student must require related services to benefit from special education services
• PLAAFP is the most important section of the IEP. • Caution: Special Education is not a tutoring or mentoring service.
Basic Procedures
• On Track Registration• Mileage• Time Management Report• Housekeeping Items• Evaluate Davis
• Sign in to Evaluate Davis • Self-Assessment • Create goals (Consider RS Department
goals SLO & SB)
• Reminder for Friday: Special Education Department Opening Meeting (3 venues)
Professional Day Make Up
SEP Comp time Make UP
Planned Absence Schedule
Time Management Report(Time Card)
Time Management Report Explanation
Forms
Commitments
• Us to You• You to Us• For and behalf of students with disabilities